K Number
K243013
Device Name
LIAISON PLEX Gram-Negative Blood Culture Assay
Date Cleared
2025-04-18

(203 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
866.3365
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP Authorized
Intended Use
The LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay, performed using the automated, sample‐to‐result LIAISON PLEX® System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram‐negative pathogens and/or selected genetic determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture bottles. LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system which contain gram‐negative bacteria as determined by Gram stain. The LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay detects and identifies the following: Resistance Markers: - CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M) - IMP (blaIMP) - KPC (blaKPC) - NDM (blaNDM) - OXA (blaOXA) - VIM (blaVIM) - MCR - SME (blaSME) Gram Negative Genera and Species: - Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae - Acinetobacter baumannii - Acinetobacter spp. - Citrobacter spp. - Enterobacter spp. (1) - Escherichia coli (2) - Haemophilus influenzae - Klebsiella oxytoca - Klebsiella pneumoniae - Klebsiella variicola - Morganella morganii - Neisseria meningitidis - Proteus spp. - Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Pseudomonas spp. - Salmonella spp. - Serratia marcescens - Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (1) Due to reclassification, Klebsiella aerogenes will be reported Enterobacter spp. (2) LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay will not distinguish between Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. (S. dysenteriae, S. boydii, S. flexneri and S. sonnei) LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to carbapenems (blaCTX‐M, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA48‐like, blaVIM, blaSME) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial‐resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In addition, the panel includes an assay for the detection of the mobilized genetic determinant MCR, an emerging marker of public health importance. The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of resistance to ß‐lactams and colistin exist. LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is not intended to monitor treatment of these infections. Sub‐culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing.
Device Description
The LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay is an automated test for the detection and identification of nucleic acid from gram‐negative bacteria in a positive blood culture media sample. The BCN Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system, and which contain gram‐negative bacteria, as determined by a Gram stain. The LIAISON PLEX® System is a fully automated, bench‐top "sample‐to‐answer" device that performs sample preparation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microarray‐based hybridization for the detection of target‐specific nucleic acids. The test reagents are supplied as a single, disposable test cartridge. PCR is not performed on the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, as it is a non‐amplified, direct detection test performed on the LIAISON PLEX® System.
More Information

No.

The device automates molecular diagnostic testing (PCR and microarray hybridization) for pathogen detection and antibiotic resistance markers. There is no indication of any AI models being used for data analysis, interpretation, or decision-making beyond the direct output of the molecular assays and rule-based interpretation.

No
This device is an in vitro diagnostic test designed to identify gram-negative pathogens and antimicrobial resistance markers in positive blood cultures, aiding in diagnosis, but it does not directly provide therapy or treatment.

Yes

The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states that the device is "a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test" and is "indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI)."

No

The device is a system that includes an automated, bench-top "sample-to-answer" hardware component (LIAISON PLEX® System) that performs physical steps (sample preparation, PCR, microarray-based hybridization) with disposable test cartridges. This is not a software-only medical device.

Yes
The intended use explicitly states "qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test".

N/A

Intended Use / Indications for Use

The LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay, performed using the automated, sample‐to‐result LIAISON PLEX® System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram‐negative pathogens and/or selected genetic determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture bottles. LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system which contain gram‐negative bacteria as determined by Gram stain.

The LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay detects and identifies the following:

Resistance Markers:

  • CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M)
  • IMP (blaIMP)
  • KPC (blaKPC)
  • NDM (blaNDM)
  • OXA (blaOXA)
  • VIM (blaVIM)
  • MCR
  • SME (blaSME)

Gram Negative Genera and Species:

  • Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae
  • Acinetobacter baumannii
  • Acinetobacter spp.
  • Citrobacter spp.
  • Enterobacter spp. (1)
  • Escherichia coli (2)
  • Haemophilus influenzae
  • Klebsiella oxytoca
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae
  • Klebsiella variicola
  • Morganella morganii
  • Neisseria meningitidis
  • Proteus spp.
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • Pseudomonas spp.
  • Salmonella spp.
  • Serratia marcescens
  • Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

(1) Due to reclassification, Klebsiella aerogenes will be reported Enterobacter spp.
(2) LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay will not distinguish between Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. (S. dysenteriae, S. boydii, S. flexneri and S. sonnei)

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to carbapenems (blaCTX‐M, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA48‐like, blaVIM, blaSME) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial‐resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In addition, the panel includes an assay for the detection of the mobilized genetic determinant MCR, an emerging marker of public health importance. The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of resistance to ß‐lactams and colistin exist.

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is not intended to monitor treatment of these infections. Sub‐culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing.

Product codes

PEN

Device Description

The LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay is an automated test for the detection and identification of nucleic acid from gram‐negative bacteria in a positive blood culture media sample. The BCN Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system, and which contain gram‐negative bacteria, as determined by a Gram stain.

The LIAISON PLEX® System is a fully automated, bench‐top "sample‐to‐answer" device that performs sample preparation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microarray‐based hybridization for the detection of target‐specific nucleic acids. The test reagents are supplied as a single, disposable test cartridge. PCR is not performed on the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, as it is a non‐amplified, direct detection test performed on the LIAISON PLEX® System.

Mentions image processing

Not Found

Mentions AI, DNN, or ML

Not Found

Input Imaging Modality

Not Found

Anatomical Site

Bloodstream

Indicated Patient Age Range

Not Found

Intended User / Care Setting

Prescription use only. For in vitro diagnostic use only.

Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

Not Found

Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

A total of 381 unique prospectively collected specimens that met the pre‐determined inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Clinical runs and re‐runs using the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay were tested on the LIAISON PLEX® System by trained operators at four clinical sites. For targets that exhibited low prevalence rates in the prospective study, the prospective specimen set was supplemented with 231 pre‐selected left‐over, de‐identified specimens sourced from seven vendors in the United States and one site in Italy. The pre‐selected specimens were identified by Standard of Care (SoC) testing and confirmed as positive by VITEK 2 and/or PCR followed by bi‐directional sequencing (BDS) according to the reference method algorithm prior to enrollment in the study. To minimize bias, pre‐selected specimens were tested across the five sites in a randomized, blinded manner along with negative specimens.

Out of the 381 specimens enrolled in the prospective arm of the study, 30 prospective specimens were excluded from the analysis (one (1) duplicate patient enrollment, and 29 with incomplete reference testing results due to mixed growth, insufficient growth, or no growth).

Contrived specimens were tested to supplement the positive clinical specimens in the prospective and pre‐selected study cohorts for all targets. A total of 746 specimens were contrived, blinded, randomized, and tested along with negative specimens at four testing sites during April 2024– August 2024.

The LIASON PLEX® BCN Assay results were compared to culture followed by automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2, PCR followed by BDS, or a combination according to the algorithm described in Table 19 below.

Table 19 – Reference Method Algorithm

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay TargetComparator Method
Acinetobacter spp.Culture followed by Automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2
Citrobacter spp.
Enterobacter spp.
Enterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae
Escherichia coli^(1)
Haemophilus influenzae
Morganella morganii
Neisseria meningitidisCulture followed by Automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2
Proteus spp.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas spp.
Salmonella spp.
Serratia marcescens
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Acinetobacter baumanniiCulture followed by Automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2 with positive confirmation of the clinical isolate by PCR/BDS
Klebsiella oxytoca
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Klebsiella variicola
CTX-M (blaCTX-M)PCR followed by bi-directional sequencing
IMP (blaIMP)
KPC (blaKPC)
NDM (blaNDM)
OXA (blaOXA)
VIM (blaVIM)
MCR
SME

^(1)The LIAISION PLEX® BCN Assay is not designed to distinguish between Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. (S. dysenteriae, S. boydii, S. flexneri, and S. sonnei).

Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)

Clinical Study:
A multi‐site clinical study established the diagnostic accuracy of the LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay for the detection and identification of pathogenic gram‐negative organisms in positive blood culture. The clinical performance of the LIAISON® PLEX BCN Assay was evaluated using clinical specimens prospectively collected between March 2024 and July 2024 from four geographically diverse clinical sites within the United States. The clinical study utilized remnant, de‐identified blood culture specimens collected from patients exhibiting clinical signs and symptoms of bloodstream infection, evidenced by positive identification by a continuous monitoring blood culture system.

Sample Size:

  • Prospective specimens: 351 (after exclusions)
  • Pre-selected specimens: 231
  • Contrived specimens: 746

Key Results:
Combined Prospective and Pre-Selected Data:

  • For most pathogen targets and resistance markers, Sensitivity/PPA was >= 90% (often 100%) and Specificity/NPA was >= 99% (often 100%).
  • Noteworthy lower sensitivity: Acinetobacter spp. (60% prospective, 94.3% pre-selected, 90% combined), Neisseria meningitidis (33.3% pre-selected and combined).
  • Some targets (e.g., IMP, VIM, MCR, SME) either had no positive cases in the prospective or pre-selected samples, or had very few, resulting in N/A or wide confidence intervals for sensitivity.

Contrived Data Set:

  • For all bacterial identifications and resistance marker genes, Sensitivity/PPA was 100% (except for Haemophilus influenzae which was 0/0 and 0%).
  • Specificity/NPA was also consistently high, generally 99.5% or 100%.

Overall acceptance criteria were met:

  • The assay shall achieve a target Sensitivity/Positive Percent Agreement of ≥90% for all targets except Klebsiella oxytoca and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia which shall achieve ≥85%.
  • The Specificity/Negative Percent Agreement for each target should be established at a level of ≥95%.
  • Failure rate shall be ≤10%.

Analytical Performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:

  • Site-to-site Reproducibility: 99.9% overall reproducibility.
  • Within-Laboratory Precision/Repeatability: 99.8% reproducibility.
    b. Linearity/Assay Reportable Range: Not applicable (qualitative assay).
    c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
    • Specimen Stability: Stable for up to 72 hours (3 days) at 2-8°C or 15-30°C.
    • Device Stability: Stable for at least 3 months at 15-30°C. Open-box stability up to 8 hours.
    • Fresh vs. Frozen Specimen Stability: 100% positivity for target positive samples at both growth durations and all freeze-thaw conditions. 0% positivity for negative blood.
      d. Growth and Detection Study: 100% positivity for target positive samples and 0% positivity when tested with negative blood.
      e. Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity):
    • Lab testing: 100% positivity for 245 of 246 on-panel organisms.
    • Predicted (in silico) reactivity: High predicted inclusivity (>=99% or 100%) for most targets based on sequence homology.
      f. Analytical Specificity (Exclusivity):
    • Cross-Reactivity (Lab Testing): 11 cross-reactive species out of 113 off-panel species tested.
    • In Silico Cross-Reactivity: Various predicted cross-reactivities with other bacteria and species based on sequence analysis.
      g. Interference:
    • Competitive Inhibition / Co-Infection and Microbial Interference: 100% target detection for all ten on-panel organisms in the presence of other on-panel strains and off-panel microbes.
    • Interfering Substances: 100% positivity for targets in presence of common interfering substances.
    • Carry-Over/Cross Contamination: 100% agreement between expected and observed results, indicating no cross-contamination or carry-over.

Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)

See Section "Summary of Performance Studies" above for detailed values.

  • Sensitivity/Positive Percent Agreement (PPA)
  • Specificity/Negative Percent Agreement (NPA)

Predicate Device(s)

K132843 VERIGENE Blood Culture Gram‐Negative (BC‐GN) Nucleic Acid Test

Reference Device(s)

Not Found

Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information

Not Found

§ 866.3365 Multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures.

(a)
Identification. A multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures is a qualitative in vitro device intended to simultaneously detect and identify microorganism nucleic acids from blood cultures that test positive by Gram stain or other microbiological stains. The device detects specific nucleic acid sequences for microorganism identification as well as for antimicrobial resistance. This device aids in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections when used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. However, the device does not replace traditional methods for culture and susceptibility testing.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's guideline document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guideline: Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay for Identification of Microorganisms and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures.” For availability of the guideline document, see § 866.1(e).

U.S. Food & Drug Administration 510(k) Clearance Letter

Page 1

U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov

Doc ID # 04017.07.05

April 18, 2025

Luminex Corporation
Sheri Calderon
Senior Regulatory Affairs Associate
4088 Commercial Avenue
Northbrook, Illinois 60062

Re: K243013
Trade/Device Name: LIAISON PLEX Gram-Negative Blood Culture Assay
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3365
Regulation Name: Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay For Identification Of Microorganisms And Resistance Markers From Positive Blood Cultures
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: PEN, NSU
Dated: March 21, 2025
Received: March 21, 2025

Dear Sheri Calderon:

We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Page 2

K243013 - Sheri Calderon Page 2

Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).

Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.

All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-

Page 3

K243013 - Sheri Calderon Page 3

assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Noel J. Gerald -S

Noel J. Gerald, Ph.D.
Deputy Division Director
Division of Microbiology Devices
OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

Page 4

FORM FDA 3881 (8/23) Page 1 of 2

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration

Indications for Use

Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.

510(k) Number (if known): K243013

Device Name: LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Negative Blood Culture Assay

Indications for Use (Describe)

The LIAISON PLEX® Gram-Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay, performed using the automated, sample-to-result LIAISON PLEX® System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram-negative pathogens and/or selected genetic determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture bottles. LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system which contain gram-negative bacteria as determined by Gram stain.

The LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay detects and identifies the following:

Resistance Markers:

  • CTX-M (blaCTX-M)
  • IMP (blaIMP)
  • KPC (blaKPC)
  • NDM (blaNDM)
  • OXA (blaOXA)
  • VIM (blaVIM)
  • MCR
  • SME (blaSME)

Gram Negative Genera and Species:

  • Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae
  • Acinetobacter baumannii
  • Acinetobacter spp.
  • Citrobacter spp.
  • Enterobacter spp. (1)
  • Escherichia coli (2)
  • Haemophilus influenzae
  • Klebsiella oxytoca
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae
  • Klebsiella variicola
  • Morganella morganii
  • Neisseria meningitidis
  • Proteus spp.
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • Pseudomonas spp.
  • Salmonella spp.
  • Serratia marcescens
  • Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

(1) Due to reclassification, Klebsiella aerogenes will be reported Enterobacter spp.
(2) LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay will not distinguish between Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. (S. dysenteriae, S. boydii, S. flexneri and S. sonnei)

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to

Page 5

FORM FDA 3881 (8/23) Page 2 of 2

carbapenems (blaCTX-M, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA48-like, blaVIM, blaSME) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial-resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In addition, the panel includes an assay for the detection of the mobilized genetic determinant MCR, an emerging marker of public health importance. The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of resistance to ß-lactams and colistin exist.

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is not intended to monitor treatment of these infections. Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

Page 6

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 1 of 47

510(k) Summary

This Summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.

Preparation date: 16 April 2025

A. 510(k) Number:

K243013

B. Purpose for Submission:

Traditional 510(k), New Device

C. Measurand:

Nucleic acid sequences for the following organisms: Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella variicola, Morganella morganii, Neisseria meningitidis, Proteus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas spp., Salmonella spp., Serratia marcescens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Nucleic acid sequences for the following resistance markers: CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M), IMP (blaIMP), KPC (blaKPC), NDM (blaNDM), OXA (blaOXA), VIM (blaVIM), MCR, and SME (blaSME).

D. Type of Test:

Qualitative Multiplexed Direct Detection Hybridization Assay

E. Applicant:

Sheri Calderon, Luminex Corporation
4088 Commercial Avenue
Northbrook, IL 60062
(847) 400‐9000

F. Proprietary and Established Names:

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay

G. Regulatory Information:

Product CodeClassificationRegulation SectionPanel
PENII21 CFR 866.3365 – Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay for Identification of Microorganisms and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures83 (Microbiology)

Page 7

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 2 of 47

H. Intended Use:

1. Intended use(s):

The LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay, performed using the automated, sample‐to‐result LIAISON PLEX® System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram‐negative pathogens and/or selected genetic determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture bottles. LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system which contain gram‐negative bacteria as determined by Gram stain.

The LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay detects and identifies the following:

Resistance MarkersGram Negative Genera and Species
CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M)Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae
IMP (blaIMP)Acinetobacter baumannii
KPC (blaKPC)Acinetobacter spp.
NDM (blaNDM)Citrobacter spp.
OXA (blaOXA)Enterobacter spp.¹
VIM (blaVIM)Escherichia coli²
MCRHaemophilus influenzae
SME (blaSME)Klebsiella oxytoca
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Klebsiella variicola
Morganella morganii
Neisseria meningitidis
Proteus spp.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas spp.
Salmonella spp.
Serratia marcescens
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

¹ Due to reclassification, Klebsiella aerogenes will be reported Enterobacter spp.
² LIAISON PLEX BCN Assay will not distinguish between Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. (S. dysenteriae, S. boydii, S. flexneri and S. sonnei)

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to carbapenems (blaCTX‐M, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA48‐like, blaVIM, blaSME) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial‐resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In addition, the panel includes an assay for the detection of the mobilized genetic determinant MCR, an emerging marker of public health importance. The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of resistance to ß‐lactams and colistin exist.

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory

Page 8

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 3 of 47

findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is not intended to monitor treatment of these infections. Sub‐culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing.

2. Indication(s) for use:

Same as intended use.

3. Special conditions for use statement(s):

For prescription use only.
For in vitro diagnostic use only.

4. Special instrument requirements:

For use with LIAISON PLEX® Systems.

I. Device Description:

The LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay is an automated test for the detection and identification of nucleic acid from gram‐negative bacteria in a positive blood culture media sample. The BCN Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system, and which contain gram‐negative bacteria, as determined by a Gram stain.

The LIAISON PLEX® System is a fully automated, bench‐top "sample‐to‐answer" device that performs sample preparation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microarray‐based hybridization for the detection of target‐specific nucleic acids. The test reagents are supplied as a single, disposable test cartridge. PCR is not performed on the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, as it is a non‐amplified, direct detection test performed on the LIAISON PLEX® System.

J. Substantial Equivalence Information:

1. Predicate device name(s):

VERIGENE Blood Culture Gram‐Negative (BC‐GN) Nucleic Acid Test

2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):

K132843

3. Comparison with predicate:

The following tables compare the LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay to the VERIGENE Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BC‐GN) Nucleic Acid Test.

Page 9

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 4 of 47

Comparison to Predicate Device

Predicate Device: K132843 VERIGENE Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BC‐GN) Nucleic Acid Test, K132843Candidate Device: K243013 LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay
Product CodePENPEN
Regulation Number21 CFR 866.336521 CFR 866.3365
Organism DetectedOrganisms: Acinetobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Proteus spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Resistance Markers: CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M), KPC (blaKPC), NDM (blaNDM), VIM (blaVIM), IMP (blaIMP), and OXA (blaOXA) | Organisms: Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella variicola, Morganella morganii, Neisseria meningitidis, Proteus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas spp., Salmonella spp., Serratia marcescens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Resistance markers: CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M), IMP (blaIMP), KPC (blaKPC), NDM (blaNDM), OXA (blaOXA), VIM (blaVIM), MCR, and SME (blaSME). |
| Measurand | Nucleic acid from Organisms detected | Same |
| Intended Use | The Verigene® Gram Negative Blood Culture Nucleic Acid Test (BC‐GN), performed using the sample‐to‐result Verigene System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram‐negative bacteria and resistance markers. BC‐GN is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram‐negative bacteria as determined by gram stain.

BC‐GN detects and identifies the following:
Bacterial Genera and Species
Acinetobacter spp.
Citrobacter spp.
Enterobacter spp.
Proteus spp.
Escherichia coli¹
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Klebsiella oxytoca
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Resistance Markers
CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M)
KPC (blaKPC)
NDM (blaNDM)
VIM (blaVIM)
IMP (blaIMP) | The LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay, performed using the automated, sample‐to‐result LIAISON PLEX® System, is a qualitative multiplexed in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection and identification of selected gram‐negative pathogens and/or selected genetic determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture bottles. BCN is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram‐negative bacteria as determined by Gram stain.

The BCN Assay detects and identifies the following:
Gram Negative Genera and Species
Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae
Acinetobacter baumannii
Acinetobacter spp.
Citrobacter spp.
Enterobacter spp.¹
Escherichia coli²
Haemophilus influenzae
Klebsiella oxytoca
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Klebsiella variicola |

Page 10

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 5 of 47

Predicate Device: K132843 VERIGENE Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BC‐GN) Nucleic Acid Test, K132843Candidate Device: K243013 LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay
OXA (blaOXA)

¹BC‐GN will not distinguish Escherichia coli from Shigella spp. (S. dysenteriae, S. flexneri, S. boydii, and S. sonnei)

BC‐GN is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections; however, it is not used to monitor these infections. Sub‐culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by BC‐GN, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by BC‐GN, for association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing. | Morganella morganii
Neisseria meningitidis
Proteus spp.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas spp.
Salmonella spp.
Serratia marcescens
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Resistance Markers
CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M)
IMP (blaIMP)
KPC (blaKPC)
NDM (blaNDM)
OXA (blaOXA)
VIM (blaVIM)
MCR
SME (blaSME)

¹ Due to reclassification, Klebsiella aerogenes will be reported Enterobacter spp.
² LIAISON PLEX BCN will not distinguish between Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. (S. dysenteriae, S. boydii, S. flexneri and S. sonnei)

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay contains targets for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to carbapenems (blaCTX‐M, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA48‐like, blaVIM, blaSME) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial‐resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. In addition, the panel includes an assay for the detection of the mobilized genetic determinant MCR, an emerging marker of public health importance. The antimicrobial resistance gene or marker detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease. Negative results for these select antimicrobial resistance gene and marker assays do not indicate susceptibility, as multiple mechanisms of resistance to ß‐lactams and colistin exist.

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is indicated for use in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to aid in the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is not intended to monitor treatment of these infections. |

Page 11

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
Confidential & Restricted 510(k) Summary Page 6 of 47

Predicate Device: K132843 VERIGENE Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BC‐GN) Nucleic Acid Test, K132843Candidate Device: K243013 LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay
Sub‐culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for identification of organisms not detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, to detect mixed infections that may not be detected by LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay, for association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism, or for epidemiological typing.
Automated System (Sample to Answer)AutomatedSame
InstrumentationVERIGENELIAISON PLEX
Sample TypesPositive Blood CultureSame

Page 12

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 7 of 47

K. Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:

  • Class II Special Controls Guideline: Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay for Identification of Microorganisms and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures (May 2015)
  • Electronic Submission Template for Medical Device 510(k) Submissions ‐ Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (October 2, 2023).
  • Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions ‐ Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (June 14, 2023).
  • Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions ‐ Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (September 23, 2023).
  • Statistical Guidance on Reporting Results from Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Tests ‐ Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff (March 13, 2007).
  • CLSI. User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance; Approved Guideline ‐ Second Edition. CLSI document EP12‐A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.
  • CLSI. Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline. CLSI document EP25‐A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2009.
  • ISO 14971:2019 Medical devices ‐ Application of risk management to medical devices
  • IEC 62366‐1:2015 +A1:2020 Medical devices ‐ Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices
  • ISO 62304:2006 Medical device software ‐ Software life‐cycle processes
  • ISO 15223‐1:2021: Medical Devices ‐ Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labeling and information to be supplied ‐ Part 1: General requirements
  • IEC 61010‐1 Ed. 3.1 2017‐01: Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control, and laboratory use ‐ Part 1: General requirements
  • EN 61010‐2‐101:2002/IEC 61010‐2‐101:2015: Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control and laboratory use ‐ Part 2‐101: Particular requirements for in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical equipment.
  • IEC 60601‐1‐2:2014 (Edition 4.0): Medical electrical equipment ‐ Part 1‐2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance ‐ Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances ‐ Requirements and tests
  • ISO 13485:2016/EN ISO 13485:2016; Medical devices ‐ Quality Management System ‐ Requirements for regulatory purposes
  • ISO 20916:2019; In vitro diagnostic medical devices. Clinical performance studies using specimens from human subjects. Good study practice
  • EN ISO 18113‐1:2011; In vitro diagnostic medical devices ‐ Information supplied by the manufacturer (labeling). Terms, definition and general requirements
  • EN ISO 18113‐2:2011; In vitro diagnostic medical devices ‐ Information supplied by the manufacturer (labeling) – Part 2: In vitro diagnostic reagents for professional use

Page 13

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 8 of 47

  • EN ISO 18113‐3:2011; In vitro diagnostic medical devices ‐ Information supplied by the manufacturer (labeling) – Part 3: In vitro diagnostic instruments for professional use
  • EN ISO 23640:2015; In vitro diagnostic medical devices ‐ Evaluation of stability of in vitro diagnostic reagents
  • IEC 61326‐1:2012; Electrical equipment for measurement control and laboratory use ‐ EMC requirements ‐ Part 1: General requirements
  • EN 61326‐2‐6:2006/IEC 61326‐2‐6:2012; Electrical equipment for measurement control and laboratory use ‐ EMC requirements ‐ Part 2‐6: Particular requirements ‐ In vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical equipment

L. Test Principle:

The LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay is performed directly on blood culture media using blood culture bottles identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system, and which contain gram‐negative bacteria, as determined by a Gram stain. The system consists of an instrument and a single‐use, disposable test cartridge. The user loads an aliquot of the sample into the sample port of the LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Cartridge. Next, the user sets up the sample order on the LIAISON PLEX® System by first entering the sample information or scanning the barcode ID located on the sample tube, then scanning the barcode ID located on the test cartridge. Last, the user inserts the test cartridge into the processing module to initiate the test. The LIAISON PLEX® System identifies the assay being run and automatically initiates the proper testing protocol to process the sample, analyze the data, and generate test results.

The LIAISON PLEX® System automates the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay sample analysis through the following steps: a) Sample Preparation: Nucleic acid extraction via mechanical and chemical cell lysis and magnetic bead‐based nucleic acid isolation; b) Hybridization: Extracted nucleic acid hybridize to target‐specific capture DNA on a microarray format, and target‐specific mediator and gold nanoparticle probe hybridize to captured nucleic acids; c) Signal Analysis: Gold nanoparticle probes bound specifically to target‐containing spots in the microarray are silver‐enhanced, and light scatter from the spots is measured and further analyzed to determine the presence (Detected) or absence (Not Detected) of a target.

M. Performance Characteristics:

1. Analytical performance:

a. Precision/Reproducibility:

Site‐to‐site Reproducibility

Site‐to‐site reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay was evaluated by testing LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay cartridges with a reproducibility panel, blinded to operators, consisting of eight blood culture samples; six representative on‐panel organisms

Page 14

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 9 of 47

(Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, Escherichia coli, and Serratia marcescens) individually cultured at ring positivity and eight hours after ring positivity, one negative sample contrived with an off‐panel organism (Staphylococcus aureus), and one negative blood culture matrix (NBM) sample. Each sample of the blinded reproducibility panel was tested in triplicate for each sample type by two operators at three sites, two external and one internal, for five non‐consecutive testing days. The call agreement results (%) are presented in Table 1, which demonstrated 100% call accuracy for ring positive, ring positive plus 8 hours, and negative blood matrix samples, and 99.4% call accuracy for the contrived negative sample (Staphylococcus aureus). Overall, results of site‐to‐site reproducibility evaluation demonstrated 99.9% reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay.

Table 1. LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Site‐to‐Site Reproducibility Results Summary

Organism IDReportable TargetsSample TypeCall Agreement (%) with Expected ResultsOverall95% C.I.
Site 1Site 2Site 3Overall (All Sites)
Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter baumannii | Acinetobacter spp.Ring Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Klebsiella pneumoniaeEnterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | Klebsiella pneumoniaeRing Positive100% (30/30)100% (31/31)100% (30/30)100% (91/91)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Haemophilus influenzaeHaemophilus influenzaeRing Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Neisseria meningitidisNeisseria meningitidisRing Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Escherichia coliEnterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | Escherichia coliRing Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Serratia marcescensEnterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae |Serratia marcescensRing Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%

Page 15

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 10 of 47

Organism IDReportable TargetsSample TypeCall Agreement (%) with Expected ResultsOverall95% C.I.
Site 1Site 2Site 3Overall (All Sites)
Staphylococcus aureusNoneRing Positive + 8 HR98.3% (59/60)100% (60/60)100% (60/60)99.4% (179/180)96.9% ‐ 99.9%
No Target (Negative Blood Matrix)NoneRing Negative100% (60/60)100% (60/60)100% (60/60)100% (180/180)97.9% ‐ 100%

Resistance Markers

OrganismTargetSample TypeCall Agreement (%) with Expected ResultsOverall95% C.I.
Site 1Site 2Site 3Overall (All Sites)
Acinetobacter baumanniiOXARing Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Klebsiella pneumoniaeKPCRing Positive100% (30/30)100% (31/31)100% (30/30)100% (91/91)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Escherichia coliMCRRing Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Serratia marcescensSMERing Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%

Overall Agreement (All Targets / Sample Types) | 99.8% (479/480) | 100% (481/481) | 100% (480/480) | 99.9% (1440/1441) |
Overall (All Sites) 95% Confidence Interval | | | | 99.6% ‐ 100% |

Precision/Repeatability

Within laboratory (operator‐to‐operator) precision/repeatability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay was evaluated based on the results generated by two operators testing site‐to‐site reproducibility samples at ring positivity and at 8 hours plus ring positivity, contrived negative, and negative blood culture samples. Within laboratory precision/repeatability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay was 99.8%, and results are summarized in Table 2.

Page 16

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 11 of 47

Organism IDReportable TargetsSample TypeCall Agreement (%) with Expected ResultsOverall95% C.I.
Site 1Site 2Site 3Overall (All Sites)
Staphylococcus aureusNoneRing Positive + 8 HR98.3% (59/60)100% (60/60)100% (60/60)99.4% (179/180)96.9% ‐ 99.9%
No Target (Negative Blood Matrix)NoneRing Negative100% (60/60)100% (60/60)100% (60/60)100% (180/180)97.9% ‐ 100%

Resistance Markers

Ring Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Acinetobacter baumanniiOXARing Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive100% (30/30)100% (31/31)100% (30/30)100% (91/91)95.9% ‐ 100%
Klebsiella pneumoniaeKPCRing Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Escherichia coliMCRRing Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Ring Positive100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%
Serratia marcescensSMERing Positive + 8 HR100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (30/30)100% (90/90)95.9% ‐ 100%

Overall Agreement (All Targets / Sample Types) | 99.8% (479/480) | 100% (481/481) | 100% (480/480) | 99.9% (1440/1441) |
Overall (All Sites) 95% Confidence Interval | | | | 99.6% ‐ 100% |

Precision/Repeatability

Within laboratory (operator‐to‐operator) precision/repeatability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay was evaluated based on the results generated by two operators testing site‐to‐site reproducibility samples at ring positivity and at 8 hours plus ring positivity, contrived negative, and negative blood culture samples. Within laboratory precision/repeatability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay was 99.8%, and results are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Within‐Laboratory Precision/Repeatability Results Summary

OrganismTarget TypeAgreement with Expected Results
Operator 1
Acinetobacter baumanniiRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Klebsiella pneumoniaeRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Haemophilus influenzaeRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Neisseria meningitidisRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Escherichia coliRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Serratia marcescensRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Staphylococcus aureusOff‐panel Negative100% 30/30
No Target (Negative Blood Matrix)Off‐panel Negative100% 30/30

Page 17

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 12 of 47

Table 2. LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Within‐Laboratory Precision/Repeatability Results Summary

OrganismTarget TypeAgreement with Expected Results
Operator 1
Acinetobacter baumanniiRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Klebsiella pneumoniaeRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Haemophilus influenzaeRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Neisseria meningitidisRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Escherichia coliRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Serratia marcescensRing Positive100% 15/15
Ring Positive +8 Hours100% 15/15
Staphylococcus aureusOff‐panel Negative100% 30/30
No Target (Negative Blood Matrix)Off‐panel Negative100% 30/30

b. Linearity/assay reportable range:

Not applicable. The LIAISON® PLEX Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay is a qualitative assay.

c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):

Controls

Several controls are built into the assay and system to ensure identification of processing

Page 18

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 13 of 47

errors and to establish validity of test results.

Internal Controls

Each LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay cartridge includes internal controls to ensure performance of sample preparation and detection. The internal extraction control is present in the lysis tube when the sample is added. Sample preparation is initiated and the extraction control assesses extraction, nucleic acid recovery, and detection. Finally, addition of a post‐extraction hybridization control serves as an indicator of successful hybridization. Internal control results are reported as Pass or Fail on the printed reports (see Table 3 for detailed explanations of each control result). Internal controls must generate a signal above threshold in each internal reaction for the system to report a valid test result.

Table 3. Interpretation of Controls on the LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Report

Internal ControlResultExplanationSuggested Action
PassTest was completed and internal controls were successful, indicating that valid results were generated.Review and report results
FailOne or more internal control failed.Repeat test with a new cartridge

External Controls

Positive and negative external controls should be tested with each new lot or shipment of reagents, or monthly, (whichever occurs first), or in accordance with updated local, regional, state, and/or federal guidelines. Verified negative blood matrix can be used as the negative control. Previously characterized positive samples or verified negative blood matrix spiked with well characterized organisms may be used as the external positive control. External controls should be used in accordance with laboratory protocols and in accordance with local, state, and federal accrediting organizations, as applicable.

Stability

Specimen Stability

Performance of the LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay was assessed using specimens tested in a fresh state (at bottle/ring positive and at bottle/ring positive + 8 hours) and after exposure to various storage conditions. Conditions tested included refrigerated storage (2° to 8°C) and room temperature storage (15°C to 30°C) to span the typical "fresh specimen" storage conditions across multiple time points. Positive specimens containing four target organisms representing a total of eight gram‐negative targets and select resistance markers were tested as well as negative blood matrix control specimen containing no target organisms. All positives tested yielded 100% positivity across all time‐points and storage conditions tested. The negative sample demonstrated 0% positivity across all time‐points and storage conditions tested. The results demonstrated that specimens may be stored under the following temperature conditions

Page 19

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 14 of 47

without impacting the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN cartridge:

  • Up to 72 hours (3 days) at Refrigerated (2‐8°C) or Room Temperature (15‐30°C) storage conditions.

Device Stability

A shelf‐life study was conducted to evaluate the real‐time stability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay at the recommended storage conditions of room temperature (15°C – 30°C). Real‐time stability was assessed using seven Positive Control panels which interrogate all reportable targets in the assay, and one Negative Control which consisted of negative blood matrix. Results of real‐time stability demonstrated the LIAISON PLEX BCN® Assay is stable for at least 3 months when stored at 15°C – 30°C. Shelf‐life will be extended based upon results of on‐going stability testing.

An open box stability study was performed to evaluate the stability of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay cartridges at room temperature once removed from their foil pouch. Testing was performed shortly after kits were manufactured and will be repeated at the end of the product shelf‐life. Non‐aged (Tinitial) cartridges were tested at 0 hours (T0), 2 hours (T2), and 9 hours (T9) after removal from their pouch. Each time point included testing of seven Positive Control panels which interrogate all reportable targets in the assay, and one Negative Control which consisted of negative blood matrix. Results of open‐box stability indicate the cartridges are stable for up to eight hours after cartridges are removed from their foil pouches and stored at room temperature.

Fresh vs. Frozen Specimen Stability

A fresh vs. frozen specimen stability study was performed to evaluate the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® Blood Culture Negative (BCN) Assay across specimens that have been prepared "fresh" (at two growth durations referred to as Bottle/Ring Positive and Bottle/Ring Positive + 8 hours) and subjected to a range of freeze/thaw (F/T) cycles as well as those experiencing a prolonged storage in frozen conditions. The study was performed using four representative organisms detected by the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay cultured in blood culture bottles. Performance testing using negative blood matrix served as a control test during the study. Material was tested under 5 different conditions – Initial Testing: Fresh, 1st Freeze‐thaw, 2nd Freeze‐thaw; 1‐Month Testing: 1st Freeze‐thaw and 2nd Freeze‐thaw. Material was frozen for a minimum of 8 hours in between each freeze‐thaw cycle. In the 1‐Month testing, material was frozen for at least 34 days prior to the 1st freeze‐thaw. A total of 455 replicates were included in this study. The results demonstrated 100% positivity for target positive samples at both growth durations and all freeze‐thaw conditions. The negative blood demonstrated 0% positivity of all reportable targets for the assay at all freeze‐thaw conditions.

d. Growth and Detection Study

The Growth and Detection study was performed to evaluate detection of species / targets listed in Table 4 in blood cultures. For the evaluation, 15 organisms representing all 26 reportable targets were tested at Ring Positive and Ring Positive + 8 hours. Concentrations

Page 20

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 15 of 47

for both conditions are outlined in Table 4. One negative blood bottle was also grown for at least five days in an automated blood culture system until it was flagged as "negative" and was also tested on the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay.

A minimum of three Bottle/Ring Positive and three Bottle/Ring Positive +8 Hour bottles from each BCN organism were tested in triplicate and one negative blood bottle was tested in triplicate on the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay. The LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay results, presented in Table 4 and Table 5, demonstrated 100% positivity for target positive samples and 0% positivity when tested with negative blood.

Table 4 – Growth and Detection Summary – Positive Samples

Species TestedTargets TestedAt Positivity8 Hours After Positivity
Per Bottle (CFU/mL)Mean (CFU/mL)Positive Agreement /Total (% Detected)Per Bottle (CFU/mL)Mean (CFU/mL)Positive Agreement /Total (% Detected)
Acinetobacter baumannii [OXA] IHMA 128307Acinetobacter baumannii | Acinetobacter spp. | OXA2.13E+082.06E+089/9 (100%)2.09E+081.63E+089/9 (100%)
2.18E+081.06E+08
1.86E+081.75E+08
Citrobacter freundii [VIM] IHMA 549813Citrobacter spp. | Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | VIM9.63E+081.28E+099/9 (100%)1.76E+091.87E+099/9 (100%)
1.49E+092.16E+09
1.39E+091.68E+09
Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 35030Enterobacter spp. | Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae1.46E+091.58E+099/9 (100%)1.68E+092.04E+099/9 (100%)
1.61E+092.07E+09
1.68E+092.36E+09
Escherichia coli [MCR] NCTC 13846Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | Escherichia coli | MCR1.70E+091.87E+099/9 (100%)1.45E+091.65E+099/9 (100%)
1.96E+091.83E+09
1.95E+091.66E+09
Klebsiella oxytoca [CTX‐M] IHMA 683079CTX‐M | Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | Klebsiella oxytoca4.53E+089.69E+089/9 (100%)5.3E+083.41E+089/9 (100%)
1.48E+092.9E+08
9.73E+082.04E+08
Klebsiella pneumoniae [KPC] IHMA 629630Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | KPC | Klebsiella pneumoniae1.33E+091.56E+099/9 (100%)1.55E+091.58E+099/9 (100%)
1.66E+091.61E+09
1.69E+091.59E+09
Klebsiella variicola ATCC BAA‐830Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | Klebsiella variicola1.66E+091.75E+099/9 (100%)2.00E+092.06E+099/9 (100%)
1.82E+092.13E+09
1.78E+092.05E+09
Salmonella ent ent Enteritidis ATCC 13076Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | Salmonella spp.4.90E+072.56E+089/9 (100%)1.88E+091.85E+099/9 (100%)
1.38E+082.06E+09
5.80E+081.61E+09
SerratiaEnterobacteriaceae /1.55E+082.38E+089/91.82E+091.47E+0912/12¹

Page 21

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 16 of 47

Species TestedTargets TestedAt Positivity8 Hours After Positivity
Per Bottle (CFU/mL)Mean (CFU/mL)Positive Agreement /Total (% Detected)Per Bottle (CFU/mL)Mean (CFU/mL)Positive Agreement /Total (% Detected)
marcescens [SME] NCTC 13920Morganellaceae | SME | Serratia marcescens3.27E+08(100%)1.39E+09(100%)
2.32E+081.19E+09
Morganella morganii [NDM] IHMA 605873Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | Morganella morganii | NDM1.77E+091.68E+099/9 (100%)2.75E+092.71E+099/9 (100%)
1.76E+092.65E+09
1.52E+092.74E+09
Pseudomonas aeruginosa [IMP] IHMA 576602IMP | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Pseudomonas spp.8.97E+087.99E+089/9 (100%)1.33E+091.26E+099/9 (100%)
7.30E+081.14E+09
7.70E+081.30E+09
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ATCC 13636Stenotrophomonas maltophilia3.83E+084.48E+089/9 (100%)1.23E+091.00E+099/9 (100%)
5.23E+089.47E+08
4.37E+088.27E+08
Proteus mirabilis ATCC 12453Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | Proteus spp.2.14E+092.26E+099/9 (100%)2.28E+092.12E+099/9 (100%)
2.35E+091.80E+09
2.30E+092.28E+09
Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 9007Haemophilus influenzae2.12E+092.13E+099/9 (100%)1.37E+091.70E+099/9 (100%)
2.32E+092.42E+09
1.96E+091.32E+09
Neisseria meningitidis ATCC 43744Neisseria meningitidis2.39E+081.88E+089/9 (100%)1.43E+082.87E+089/9 (100%)
2.36E+084.10E+08
8.93E+073.07E+08¹

¹ One OXA false positive was observed in initial testing. An additional set of replicates was tested resulting in 12 total replicates.

Table 5 – Growth and Detection Summary – Negative Samples

Species TestedTargets TestedPer Bottle (CFU/mL)Mean (CFU/mL)Targets Detected/Total (% Detected)
Negative BloodNone0.00E+000.00E+000/3 (0%)

e. Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity)

The analytical reactivity study was performed to evaluate the inclusivity of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay through laboratory testing of multiple strains representing "on‐panel" reportable target bacteria or bacterial species. All on‐panel organisms (n = 246) were

Page 22

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 17 of 47

tested in triplicate. One hundred percent (100%) positivity was noted for all targets including expected resistance marker calls for 245 of the 246 on‐panel organisms. A summary of organism results is listed in Table 6 and a summary of resistance marker results is listed in Table 7. Of the 246 on‐panel organisms tested, 17 organisms generated additional target calls that align with known cross‐reactivity based on in silico analysis, or design features. Additionally, one on‐panel organism (S. proteamaculans) only generated the known cross‐reactivity target call, not the expected target call. The 18 cross‐reactive organisms are highlighted in Table 8.

Table 6: LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity) Summary by Organism

Reportable Target (Family)Reportable Target (Genus)Reportable Target (Species)OrganismNumber of strainsPositivity
N/AAcinetobacter spp.N/AAcinetobacter guillouiae1100%
Acinetobacter radioresistens2100%
Acinetobacter baylyi1100%
Acinetobacter bereziniae1100%
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus1100%
Acinetobacter haemolyticus1100%
Acinetobacter indicus1100%
Acinetobacter johnsonii1100%
Acinetobacter junii1100%
Acinetobacter lwoffii1100%
Acinetobacter nosocomialis1100%
Acinetobacter pittii1100%
Acinetobacter schindleri1100%
Acinetobacter ursingii1100%
Acinetobacter spp.Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter baumannii5100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeCitrobacter spp.N/ACitrobacter amalonaticus2100%
Citrobacter braakii2100%
Citrobacter farmeri1100%
Citrobacter freundii4100%
Citrobacter gillenii1100%
Citrobacter koseri5100%
Citrobacter murliniae1100%
Citrobacter rodentium1100%
Citrobacter sedlakii1100%
Citrobacter werkmanii1100%
Citrobacter youngae1100%
EnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacterN/AEnterobacter cloacae10100%

Page 23

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 18 of 47

Reportable Target (Family)Reportable Target (Genus)Reportable Target (Species)OrganismNumber of strainsPositivity
/ Morganellaceaespp.Enterobacter aerogenes5100%
Enterobacter amnigenus1100%
Enterobacter asburiae1100%
Enterobacter bugandensis1100%
Enterobacter cancerogenus1100%
Enterobacter hormaechei2100%
Enterobacter ludwigii1100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeN/AEscherichia coliEscherichia coli21100%
Shigella boydii2100%
Shigella dysenteriae2100%
Shigella flexneri2100%
Shigella sonnei2100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeN/AKlebsiella oxytocaKlebsiella oxytoca5100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeN/AKlebsiella pneumoniaeKlebsiella pneumoniae26100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeN/AKlebsiella variicolaKlebsiella variicola5100%
N/AN/AHaemophilus influenzaeHaemophilus influenzae6100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeN/AMorganella morganiiMorganella morganii5100%
N/AN/ANeisseria meningitidisNeisseria meningitidis10100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeProteus spp.N/AProteus hauseri1100%
Proteus mirabilis5100%
Proteus myxofaciens1100%
Proteus penneri1100%
Proteus vulgaris2100%
N/APseudomonas spp.N/APseudomonas alcaligenes1100%
Pseudomonas chlororaphis1100%
Pseudomonas fluorescens1100%
Pseudomonas luteola1100%
Pseudomonas mendocina1100%
Pseudomonas monteilii1100%
Pseudomonas mosselii1100%
Pseudomonas1100%

Page 24

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 19 of 47

Reportable Target (Family)Reportable Target (Genus)Reportable Target (Species)OrganismNumber of strainsPositivity
mucidolens
Pseudomonas oryzihabitans1100%
Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes1100%
Pseudomonas putida1100%
Pseudomonas resinovorans1100%
Pseudomonas stutzeri1100%
Pseudomonas veronii1100%
Pseudomonas spp.Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas aeruginosa4100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeSalmonella spp.N/ASalmonella bongori1100%
Salmonella enterica12100%
Salmonella enterica subsp. arizonae1100%
Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae1100%
Salmonella enterica subsp. houtenae1100%
Salmonella enterica subsp. indica1100%
N/AN/AStenotrophomonas maltophiliaStenotrophomonas maltophilia5100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeN/ASerratia marcescensSerratia marcescens6100%
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeN/AN/ACedecea davisae2100%^
Cedecea lapagei1100%^
Cedecea neteri1100%
Cronobacter muytjensii1100%
Cronobacter sakazakii2100%
Enteric group 1371100%
Escherichia albertii1100%^
Escherichia fergusonii1100%
Escherichia hermanii1100%
Edwardsiella tarda1100%
Hafnia alvei1100%
Kluyvera ascorbata1100%^
Kluyvera cryocrescens1100%
Kluyvera georgiana1100%
Kluyvera intermedia1100%
Leclercia adecarboxylata1100%^

Page 25

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 20 of 47

Reportable Target (Family)Reportable Target (Genus)Reportable Target (Species)OrganismNumber of strainsPositivity
Lelliottia nimipressuralis1100%^
Pantoea agglomerans1100%
Plesiomonas shigelloides1100%
Pluralibacter gergoviae1100%
Providencia acalifaciens1100%
Providencia heimbachae1100%
Providencia rettigeri1100%^
Providencia stuartii1100%^
Rahnella aquatillis1100%
Raoultella ornithinolytica1100%^
Raoultella planticola1100%^
Raoultella terrigena1100%^
Serratia plymuthica1100%
Serratia grimesii1100%^
Xenorhabdus bovienii1100%^
Xenorhabdus poinarii1100%
Yersinia enterocolitica1100%
Yokenella regensburgei1100%
Serratia ficaria1100%^
Serratia fonticola1100%^
Serratia liquefaciens1100%^
Serratia proteamaculans10%^
Serratia rubidaea1100%^

^ See Table 8. Known Cross‐Reactive Organisms

Table 7: LIAISON PLEX BCN Assay Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity) Resistance Marker Summary

Reportable Target (Resistance Marker)Organism# of strains% Detected
CTX‐MCitrobacter freundii1100%
Enterobacter cloacae5100%
Escherichia coli14100%
Klebsiella oxytoca2100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae16100%
Kluyvera ascorbata1100%
Kluyvera georgiana1100%
Morganella morganii1100%
Salmonella enterica1100%
IMPEscherichia coli1100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae2100%
Proteus mirabilis1100%
Pseudomonas aeruginosa1100%

Page 26

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 21 of 47

Reportable Target (Resistance Marker)Organism# of strains% Detected
KPCCitrobacter freundii2100%
Enterobacter cloacae1100%
Enterobacter hormaechei1100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae3100%
Morganella morganii1100%
MCREnterobacter cloacae2100%
Escherichia coli5100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae4100%
Salmonella enterica2100%
NDMEnterobacter cloacae1100%
Escherichia coli4100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae1100%
Morganella morganii1100%
OXAAcinetobacter baumannii5100%
Acinetobacter radioresistens2100%
Acinetobacter indicus1100%
Escherichia coli2100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae5100%
SMESerratia marcescens6100%
VIMEnterobacter cloacae1100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae2100%
Pseudomonas aeruginosa3100%

Table 8: LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay Known Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity) Cross Reactive Organisms

Cross‐Reactive OrganismStrain IDExpected TargetAdditional Target DETECTEDNumber Detected
Cedecea davisaeATCC 33431Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeKlebsiella oxytoca1/3
Cedecea lapageiATCC 43028Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeKlebsiella oxytoca1/3
Escherichia albertiiATCC 46494Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeEscherichia coli2/3
Kluyvera ascorbataATCC 33433Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae | CTX‐MKlebsiella oxytoca3/3
Leclercia adecarboxylataATCC 23216Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeEnterobacter spp.3/3
Lelliottia nimipressuralisATCC 9912Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeEnterobacter spp.3/3
Providencia rettigeriATCC 9250Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeProteus spp.1/3
Providencia stuartiiUTMB GN‐403Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeProteus spp.1/3

Page 27

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 22 of 47

Cross‐Reactive OrganismStrain IDExpected TargetAdditional Target DETECTEDNumber Detected
Raoultella ornithinolyticaATCC 31898Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeKlebsiella oxytoca3/3
Raoultella planticolaATCC 33531Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeKlebsiella oxytoca3/3
Raoultella terrigenaATCC 33257Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeCitrobacter spp.3/3
Serratia ficariaATCC 33105Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeSerratia marcescens3/3
Serratia fonticolaATCC 29844Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeSerratia marcescens3/3
Serratia grimesiiATCC 14461Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeProteus spp.2/3
Serratia liquefaciensATCC 27592Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeSerratia marcescens3/3
Serratia proteamaculansATCC 35475Enterobacteriaceae/ Morganellaceae#Serratia marcescens3/3
Serratia rubidaeaATCC 27593Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeSerratia marcescens3/3
Xenorhabdus bovieniiATCC 35271Enterobacteriaceae/ MorganellaceaeProteus spp.2/3

Expected Target not detected.

Predicted (in silico) Reactivity (Inclusivity) Results

For all targets, in silico inclusivity analysis was performed using sequences available in the GenBank and WGS (whole genome shotgun) databases from February to April 2024. Alignments of the signal fragment for each target were generated using MAFFT (version 7.490). For all targets, the inclusivity analysis involved assessing the percent homology of each oligo sequence to its binding region on each target sequence retrieved from the public databases. The predicted inclusivity based on sequence homology is the percentage of sequences with at least 90% oligo identity. In determining oligo identity, the highest percent identity of each oligo in the same component was assessed and then the lowest percent identity of the two components (capture and mediator probes) is used to characterize the inclusivity of the sequence. In silico analysis results are summarized below in Table 9.

Table 9 – In silico Analysis Results

Reportable TargetInclusive Organism/TargetTotal # Sequences in Alignment# Sequences with Percent Oligo Identity ≥ 90%Predicted Inclusivity Percentage (%)
Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter baumannii14561450100
Acinetobacter spp. ᵃAcinetobacter spp.44514445100
Citrobacter spp. ᵇCitrobacter freundii440440100
Citrobacter koseri42542299
other Citrobacter species10651065100

Page 28

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 23 of 47

Reportable TargetInclusive Organism/TargetTotal # Sequences in Alignment# Sequences with Percent Oligo Identity ≥ 90%Predicted Inclusivity Percentage (%)
Enterobacter spp. ᶜEnterobacter cloacae266266100
Klebsiella / Enterobacter aerogenes10831083100
other Enterobacter species37953777100
Enterobacteriaceae / MorganellaceaeEnterobacteriaceae2852428442100
Morganellaceae3829371597
Escherichia coliEscherichia coli50835067100
Shigella boydii711711100
Shigella dysenteriae277277100
Shigella flexneri246246100
Shigella sonnei10611061100
Haemophilus influenzaeHaemophilus influenzae236236100
Klebsiella oxytoca ᵈKlebsiella oxytoca species complex2117210599
Klebsiella pneumoniaeKlebsiella pneumoniae6163613199
Klebsiella variicolaKlebsiella variicola10610599
Morganella morganiiMorganella morganii728728100
Neisseria meningitidisNeisseria meningitidis179179100
Proteus spp. ᵉProteus spp.48448199
Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas aeruginosa13411341100
Pseudomonas spp. ᶠPseudomonas spp.64806473100
Salmonella spp.Salmonella bongori122122100
Salmonella enterica420420100
Salmonella enterica subsp. arizonae1414100
Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae2121100
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica21642162100
Salmonella enterica subsp. houtenae77100
Salmonella enterica subsp. salamae2626100
Salmonella enterica subsp. VII22100
Serratia marcescensSerratia marcescens262262100
Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaStenotrophomonas maltophilia410408100
CTX‐M ᵍCTX‐M1218712146100
IMP ʰIMP14481441100
KPC ⁱKPC40324031100
MCR ʲMCR‐116951695100
MCR‐23232100
MCR‐3211210100
NDM ᵏNDM54265420100
OXA ˡOXA‐23 family17211718100
OXA‐24/40/143 family403403100
OXA‐48 family19681962100
OXA‐58 family425425100

Page 29

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 24 of 47

Reportable TargetInclusive Organism/TargetTotal # Sequences in Alignment# Sequences with Percent Oligo Identity ≥ 90%Predicted Inclusivity Percentage (%)
SME ᵐSME18918899
VIM ⁿVIM14381438100

ᵃ Includes sequences for 86 Acinetobacter species.
ᵇ Includes sequences for 17 Citrobacter species.
ᶜ Includes sequences for 22 Enterobacter species.
ᵈ Includes sequences for 6 members of the Klebsiella oxytoca species complex (KoSC).
ᵉ Includes sequences for 11 Proteus species.
ᶠ Includes sequences for 282 Pseudomonas species.
ᵍ Includes sequences for CTX‐M‐1 to CTX‐M‐269; not all types have sequences available.
ʰ Includes sequences for IMP‐1 to IMP‐102; not all types have sequences available.
ⁱ Includes sequences for KPC‐1 to KPC‐208; not all types have sequences available.
ʲ Includes sequences for MCR‐1.1 to MCR1.37, MCR‐2.1 and MCR‐2.8, and MCR‐3.1 to MCR‐3.42; not all types have sequences available.
ᵏ Includes sequences for NDM‐1 to NDM‐61; not all types have sequences available.
ˡ Includes sequences for OXA‐23 family, OXA‐24/40/143 family, OXA‐48 family and OXA‐58 family; not all types have sequences available.
ᵐ Includes sequences for SME‐1 to SME‐5; not all types have sequences available.
ⁿ Includes sequences for VIM‐1 to VIM‐86; not all types have sequences available.

f. Analytical Specificity (Exclusivity)

Cross‐Reactivity

The analytical specificity study was performed to evaluate cross‐reactivity of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay through testing "off‐panel" organisms, including both those phylogenetically related to the on‐panel organisms and organisms likely to be present in typical blood culture samples. Out of the 113 off‐panel species tested in triplicate, 17 species generated positive results. Summary results for all 113 species are listed in Table 10a. Of those 17 species that generated positive results, 11 species were cross‐reactive and those cross‐reactive calls are listed in Table 10b.

Table 10a: LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay Analytical Specificity (Cross‐Reactivity) Summary

OrganismPositivityOrganismPositivity
Gram Positive
Abitrophia defectiva0%Leuconostoc carnosum0%
Aerococcus viridans0%Leuconostoc mesenteroids0%
Arcanobacterium bernardiae0%Listeria grayi0%
Arcanobacterium haemolyticum0%Listeria innocua0%
Bacillus cereus0%Listeria ivanovii0%
Bacillus licheniformins0%Listeria welshimeri0%
Bacillus subtilis0%Micrococcus luteus0%
Bacillus thuringiensis0%Micrococcus lylae0%
Corynebacterium amycolatum0%Pediococcus acidilactici0%
Corynebacterium diphtheriae0%Pediococcus pentosaceus0%

Page 30

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 25 of 47

OrganismPositivityOrganismPositivity
Corynebacterium pseudodiptheriticum0%Peptostreptococcus anaerobius0%
Corynebacterium striatum0%Planococcus citreus0%
Cutibacterium acnes0%Planococcus kocurii0%
Cutibacterium avidum0%Rothia dentocariosa0%
Propionibacterium freudenreichii0%Rothia (Stomatococcus) mucilaginosa0%
Enterococcus avium0%Staphylococcus capitis0%
Enterococcus casseliflavis, VRE, vanC0%Staphylococcus caprae0%
Enterocococcus dispar0%Staphylococcus cohnii0%
Enterococcus durans0%Staphylococcus haemolyticus0%
Enterococcus flavescens0%Staphylococcus hominis0%
Enterococcus gallinarum, vanC0%Staphylococcus intermedius0%
Enterococcus hirae0%Staphylococcus lugdunensis0%
Enterococcus mundtii0%Streptococcus agalactiae0%
Enterococcus raffinosus0%Streptococcus anginosus0%
Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae0%Streptococcus bovis0%
Kocuria kristinae0%Streptococcus constellatus0%
Kytococcus sedentarius, Met R0%Streptococcus equinus0%
Lactobacillus acidophilus0%Streptococcus mitis0%
Lactobacillus crispatus0%Streptococcus pneumoniae0%
Lactobacillus rhamnosus0%Streptococcus pyogenes0%
Corynebacterium frankenforstense0%
Gram Negative
Aggregatibacter aphrophilus0%Fusobacterium nucleatum0%
Bacteroides fragilis0%Haemophilus haemolyticus0%
Brevundimonas diminuta0%Herbaspirillum huttiense0%
Burkholderia cepacia0%Kingella kingae0%
Capnocytophaga ochracea0%Moraxella catarrhalis0%
Cardiobacterium hominis0%Neisseria lactamica0%
Comamonas testosteroni0%Neisseria mucosa0%
Delftia acidovorans0%Neisseria sicca0%
Eikenella corrodens0%Parabacteroides distasonis0%
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica0%Pasteurella aerogenes0%
Fusobacterium necrophorum0%Prevotella bivia0%
Aeromonas hydrophila0%Klebsiella quasivariicola100%
Haemophilus parainfluenzae0%Providencia rustigiani100%
Haemophilus parahaemolyticus33%Providencia vermicola100%
Enterobacter kobei100%Pseudomonas paraeruginosa100%
Haemophilus aegyptius100%Serratia entomophila100%
Klebsiella grimontii100%Serratia nevei100%
Klebsiella huaxiensis100%Serratia odorifera100%
Klebsiella michiganensis100%Serratia quinivorans100%
Klebsiella quasipneumoniae100%Serratia ureilytica100%
Lelliottia amnigena100%

Page 31

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 26 of 47

OrganismPositivityOrganismPositivity
Yeast/Fungi
Aspergillus fumigatus0%Candida tropicalis0%
Candida albicans0%Cryptococcus neoformans0%
Candida famata0%Kluyveromyces lactis0%
Candida glabrata0%Saccharomyces cerevisiae0%
Candida krusei0%Schizosaccharomyces pombe0%
Candida parapsilosis0%

Table 10b: LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay Cross‐Reactive Organisms Summary

OrganismPositivityResults
Not Reported to Cause Bloodstream Infections
Inclusive Cross‐reacting
Lelliottia amnigena100%Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae Enterobacter spp.
Pseudomonas paraeruginosa100%Pseudomonas spp. Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Serratia nevei100%Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae Serratia marcescens
Serratia entomophila100%Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae Serratia marcescens
Serratia ureilytica100%Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae Serratia marcescens
Klebsiella quasivariicola100%Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae Klebsiella pneumoniae
Rare/Not Primarily Associated with Bloodstream Infections
Inclusive Cross‐reacting
Haemophilus aegyptius100%None Haemophilus influenzae
Klebsiella michiganensis100%Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae Klebsiella oxytoca
Rare/Opportunistic with Some Documented Bloodstream Infection Cases
Inclusive Cross‐reacting
Klebsiella grimontii100%Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae Klebsiella oxytoca
Klebsiella quasipneumoniae100%Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae Klebsiella pneumoniae
Haemophilus parahaemolyticus33%None Enterobacteriaceae /Morganellaceae

In Silico Cross‐Reactivity

In silico exclusivity assessment of the oligo sequences incorporated in the assay designs was performed against on‐panel and off‐panel organisms listed in Table 11. Based on the analysis of sequences available in the GenBank nucleotide database as of June 7, 2024, the following potential cross‐reactivity is predicted:

  • Acinetobacter baumannii oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Acinetobacter pittii and Klebsiella pneumoniae.
  • Some strains of Escherichia species (E. albertii, E. coli, E. fergusonii, E. marmotae), Raoultella terrigena and Shigella species (S. boydii, S. dysenteriae, S. flexneri, S. sonnei) are predicted to produce false positive Citrobacter spp. results.
  • Enterobacter spp. oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Klebsiella huaxiensis, Leclercia adecarboxylata and Lelliottia species (Lelliottia amnigena, Lelliottia nimipressuralis).
  • Some strains of Aeromonas hydrophila, Aggregatibacter aphrophilus, Corynebacterium frankenforstense, Haemophilus parahaemolyticus, Haemophilus parainfluenzae and

Page 32

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 27 of 47

Pseudomonas wenzhouensis are predicted to produce false positive Enterobacteriaceae / Morganellaceae results.

  • Escherichia coli oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Escherichia albertii and Escherichia marmotae.
  • Haemophilus influenzae oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Haemophilus aegyptius.
  • Some strains of Cedecea species (C. davisae, C. lapagei, C. neteri), Enterobacter species (E. kobei, E. mori), Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species (K. aerogenes, K. electrica, K. grimontii, K. huaxiensis, K. michiganensis, K. pasteurii, K. pneumoniae, K. variicola), Kluyvera species (K. ascorbate, K. cryocrescens), Raoultella species (R. ornithinolytica, R. planticola) and unspecified Superficieibacter species are predicted to produce false positive Klebsiella oxytoca results.
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Enterobacteriaceae bacterium and Klebsiella species (K. africana, K. grimontii, K. quasipneumoniae, K. quasivariicola, K. variicola).
  • Some strains of Cronobacter muytjensii, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae are predicted to produce false positive Klebsiella variicola results.
  • Some strains of Arsenophonus species (A. apicola, A. endosymbiont, A. nasoniae), Haemophilus parahaemolyticus, Leclercia adecarboxylata, Morganella psychrotolerans, Providencia species (P. hangzhouensis, P. heimbachae, P. huaxiensis, P. manganoxydans, P. rettgeri, P. rustigianii, P. stuartii, P. vermicola), Serratia species (S. grimesii, S. proteamaculans, S. quinivorans) and Xenorhabdus species (X. bovienii, X. budapestensis, X. griffiniae, X. hominickii, X. poinarii) are predicted to produce false positive Proteus spp. results.
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Pseudomonas paraeruginosa and Pseudomonas fluorescens.
  • Salmonella spp. oligo designs are predicted to detect one strain of Enterobacteriaceae bacterium.
  • Some strains of Serratia species (S. bockelmannii, S. entomophila, S. ficaria, S. fonticola, S. grimesii, S. inhibens, S. liquefaciens, S. nematodiphila, S. nevei, S. odorifera, S. proteamaculans, S. quinivorans, S. rhizosphaerae, S. rubidaea, S. surfactantfaciens, S. symbiotica, S. ureilytica) are predicted to produce false positive Serratia marcescens results.
  • Stenotrophomonas maltophilia oligo designs are predicted to detect some strains of Enterobacter cloacae and other Stenotrophomonas species (S. acidaminiphila, S. nitritireducens, S. rhizophila).
  • Some strains of Serratia liquefaciens are predicted to produce false positive Serratia marcescens and CTX‐M results.
  • Some strains of Serratia liquefaciens and Serratia nevei are predicted to produce false positive Serratia marcescens and IMP results.
  • Some strains of Serratia nevei are predicted to produce false positive Serratia marcescens and OXA results.

Table 11. Potential Cross‐Reactive Organisms assessed in the In Silico Exclusivity Analysis

On‐Panel OrganismsOff‐Panel Organisms
Gram‐Positive BacteriaGram‐Negative BacteriaResistance MarkersYeasts / Viruses / Parasites
Acinetobacter baumanniiActinomyces israeliiActinobacillus hominisAmpCAspergillus flavus
Acinetobacter spp.Actinomyces naeslundiiActinobacillus ureaeCMYAspergillus fumigatus
Citrobacter spp.Actinomyces odontolyticusAeromonas caviaemecAAspergillus niger
Enterobacter spp.Aerococcus sanguinicolaAeromonas hydrophilamecCAspergillus terreus

Page 33

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 28 of 47

On‐Panel OrganismsOff‐Panel Organisms
Gram‐Positive BacteriaGram‐Negative BacteriaResistance MarkersYeasts / Viruses / Parasites
EnterobacteriaceaeAerococcus urinaeAeromonas sobriaompK36Blastomyces dermatitidis
Escherichia coli / Shigella spp.Aerococcus viridansAggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitansRAHNCandida albicans
Haemophilus influenzaeArcanobacterium bernardiaeAggregatibacter aphrophilusSHVCandida auris
Klebsiella oxytocaArcanobacterium haemolyticumBacteroides caccaeSPMCandida dubliniensis
Klebsiella pneumoniaeArthrobacter psychrolactophilusBacteroides fragilisTEMCandida duobushaemulonii
Klebsiella variicolaBacillus spp.Bacteroides ovatusvanACandida famata
Morganella morganiiBrochothrix thermosphactaBacteroides thetaiotaomicronvanBCandida glabrata
MorganellaceaeCarnobacterium divergensBacteroides uniformisvanCCandida guilliermondii
Neisseria meningitidisCarnobacterium maltaromaticumBacteroides vulgatusvanDCandida haemulonii
Proteus spp.Cellulomonas turbataBacteroides xylanisolvensvanMCandida inconspicua
Pseudomonas aeruginosaCellulosimicrobium cellulansBordetella bronchisepticaCandida kefyr
Pseudomonas spp.Clostridioides difficileBordetella parapertussisCandida krusei
Salmonella spp.Clostridium bifermentansBordetella pertussisCandida lipolytica
Serratia marcescensClostridium clostridioformeBrevundimonas diminutaCandida lusitaniae
Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaClostridium perfringensBrevundimonas vesicularisCandida metapsilosis
CTX‐MClostridium ramosum (Thomasclavelia ramosa)Burkholderia cepaciaCandida multis‐gemmis
IMPClostridium septicumBurkholderia malleiCandida nivariensis
KPCClostridium tertiumBurkholderia multivoransCandida norvegensis
MCR (MCR‐1, MCR‐2, MCR‐3)Clostridium tetaniBurkholderia pseudomalleiCandida orthopsilosis
NDMCorynebacterium spp.Campylobacter hominisCandida parapsilosis
OXACutibacterium acnesCapnocytophaga ochraceaCandida sojae
SMECutibacterium avidumCardiobacterium hominisCandida tropicalis
VIMCutibacterium granulosumChlamydia trachomatisCandida viswanathii
Enterococcus aviumChlamydophila pneumoniaeCoccidioides immitis
Enterococcus casseliflavusChromobacterium violaceumCoccidioides posadasii

Page 34

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 29 of 47

On‐Panel OrganismsOff‐Panel Organisms
Gram‐Positive BacteriaGram‐Negative BacteriaResistance MarkersYeasts / Viruses / Parasites
Enterococcus cecorumComamonas testosteroniCryptococcus amylolentus
Enterococcus disparDelftia acidovoransCryptococcus gattii
Enterococcus duransEikenella corrodensCryptococcus neoformans
Enterococcus faecalisElizabethkingia meningosepticaCryptococcus uniguttulatus
Enterococcus faeciumFusobacterium necrophorumCutaneotrichosporon curvatum
Enterococcus flavescensFusobacterium nucleatumCyberlindnera fabianii
Enterococcus gallinarumHaemophilus aegyptiusGeotrichum capitatum (Magnusiomyces capitatus)
Enterococcus hiraeHaemophilus ducreyiHistoplasma capsulatum
Enterococcus mundtiiHaemophilus haemolyticusKluyveromyces lactis
Enterococcus raffinosusHaemophilus parahaemolyticusKodamaea ohmeri
Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiaeHaemophilus parainfluenzaeLodderomyces elongisporus
Finegoldia magnaHaemophilus parasuisMagnusiomyces capitatus
Gemella haemolysansHaemophilus quentiniMillerozyma farinosa
Gemella morbillorumHaemophilus sputorumNaganishia albida
Granulicatella adiacensHerbaspirillum huttiensePapiliotrema laurentii
Granulicatella elegansKingella denitrificansPenicillium chrysogenum
Kocuria kristinaeKingella kingaeRhodotorula mucilaginosa
Kocuria rhizophilaKingella negevensisSaccharomyces cerevisiae
Kytococcus sedentariusKingella oralisSchizosaccharomyces pombe
Lactobacillus acidophilusLegionella pneumophilaTalaromyces marneffei
Lactobacillus crispatusLeptospira interrogansTrichosporon asahii
Lactobacillus rhamnosusMoraxella catarrhalisWickerhamomyces anomalus
Lactococcus garvieaeMoraxella osloensisBK Virus
Lactococcus lactisMycobacterium tuberculosisChikungunya Virus

Page 35

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 30 of 47

On‐Panel OrganismsOff‐Panel Organisms
Gram‐Positive BacteriaGram‐Negative BacteriaResistance MarkersYeasts / Viruses / Parasites
Leuconostoc carnosumNeisseria gonorrhoeaeCytomegalovirus
Leuconostoc citreumNeisseria lactamicaDengue Virus
Leuconostoc mesenteroidesNeisseria mucosaEnterovirus
Listeria spp.Neisseria siccaEpstein Barr Virus
Macrococcus caseolyticusParabacteroides distasonisHepatitis A virus
Micrococcus luteusParabacteroides merdaeHepatitis B virus
Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC)Pasteurella aerogenesHepatitis C virus
Mycobacterium fortuitumPasteurella canisHuman alphaherpesvirus 1
Mycobacterium mucogenicumPasteurella multocidaHuman alphaherpesvirus 2
Mycoplasma hominisPasteurella stomatisHuman betaherpesvirus 6
Mycoplasma pneumoniaePrevotella biviaHuman betaherpesvirus 7
Nocardia farcinicaPrevotella buccaeHuman Immunodeficiency Virus
Parvimonas micraPrevotella denticolaJC Virus
Pediococcus acidilacticiPrevotella melaninogenicaMeasles Virus
Pediococcus pentosaceusPrevotella oralisMumps Virus
Peptostreptococcus anaerobiusPsychrobacter cryohalolentisParvovirus B19
Planococcus citreusPsychrobacter immobilisRubella Virus
Planococcus kocuriiRalstonia mannitolilyticaVaricella Zoster Virus
Propionibacterium freudenreichiiRalstonia pickettiiWest Nile Virus
Propionibacterium propionicum (Arachnia propionica)Serratia spp.Zika Virus
Rhodococcus equiStenotrophomonas acidaminiphilaPlasmodium falciparum
Rothia dentocariosaStenotrophomonas nitritireducensTrypanosoma cruzi
Rothia mucilaginosaStenotrophomonas rhizophila
Sarcina ventriculiTreponema pallidum
Solibacillus silvestrisVeillonella parvula
Staphylococcus spp.Vibrio alginolyticus

Page 36

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 31 of 47

On‐Panel OrganismsOff‐Panel Organisms
Gram‐Positive BacteriaGram‐Negative BacteriaResistance MarkersYeasts / Viruses / Parasites
Streptococcus spp.Vibrio parahaemolyticus
Ureaplasma parvumVibrio vulnificus
Ureaplasma urealyticum
Vagococcus fluvialis
Weissella paramesenteroides

g. Interference

Competitive Inhibition / Co‐Infection and Microbial Interference

The competitive inhibition and microbial interference study was executed to evaluate the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay detection of on‐panel organisms in the presence of highly concentrated, potentially interfering microbes (off‐panel) and potential co‐infections with highly concentrated on‐panel organisms.

To evaluate competitive inhibition, a set of ten representative on‐panel strains were tested to assess dual target detection when combined in a pair‐wise fashion with the same on‐panel strains, as listed in Table 12. The ten on‐panel pair‐wise strain mixtures were each tested in triplicate as a low concentration (ring positive) – high concentration (ring positive + 8 hours) combination. The on‐panel organisms were chosen to be representative of clinically relevant poly‐microbial infections in blood stream pathogens.

To assess microbial interference, seven off‐panel microbes were combined in pairs with the same ten representative on‐panel strains for assay evaluation, as listed in Table 13. These specific organisms were chosen as they are potentially interfering micro‐organisms that are commonly found in sites of blood stream infections that may be present in positive blood culture samples but are not expected to be detected by the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay. Off‐panel microbe pair testing with on‐panel strains was performed in triplicate in high‐low concentration combinations, respectively.

As can be observed in Tables 12 and 13, 100% target detection was achieved for all ten on‐panel organisms, both in the presence of on‐panel strains and in the presence of off‐panel microbes.

Table 12: LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay Competitive Inhibition Summary

On‐Panel High Concentration TargetPositivityOn‐Panel Low Concentration TargetPositivity
Acinetobacter baumannii100%Citrobacter freundii100%
100%Enterobacter cloacae100%
100%Escherichia coli100%
100%Haemophilus influenzae100%
100%Klebsiella oxytoca100%

Page 37

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 32 of 47

On‐Panel High Concentration TargetPositivityOn‐Panel Low Concentration TargetPositivity
100%Klebsiella pneumoniae100%
100%Neisseria meningitidis100%
100%Proteus mirabilis100%
100%Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%
Citrobacter freundii100%Acinetobacter baumannii100%
100%Enterobacter cloacae100%
100%Escherichia coli100%
100%Haemophilus influenzae100%
100%Klebsiella oxytoca100%
100%Klebsiella pneumoniae100%
100%Neisseria meningitidis100%
100%Proteus mirabilis100%
100%Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%
Enterobacter cloacae100%Acinetobacter baumannii100%
100%Citrobacter freundii100%
100%Escherichia coli100%
100%Haemophilus influenzae100%
100%Klebsiella oxytoca100%
100%Klebsiella pneumoniae100%
100%Neisseria meningitidis100%
100%Proteus mirabilis100%
100%Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%
Escherichia coli100%Acinetobacter baumannii100%
100%Citrobacter freundii100%
100%Enterobacter cloacae100%
100%Haemophilus influenzae100%
100%Klebsiella oxytoca100%
100%Klebsiella pneumoniae100%
100%Neisseria meningitidis100%
100%Proteus mirabilis100%
100%Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%
Haemophilus influenzae100%Acinetobacter baumannii100%
100%Citrobacter freundii100%
100%Enterobacter cloacae100%
100%Escherichia coli100%
100%Klebsiella oxytoca100%
100%Klebsiella pneumoniae100%
100%Neisseria meningitidis100%
100%Proteus mirabilis100%
100%Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%
Klebsiella oxytoca100%Acinetobacter baumannii100%
100%Citrobacter freundii100%

Page 38

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 33 of 47

On‐Panel High Concentration TargetPositivityOn‐Panel Low Concentration TargetPositivity
100%Enterobacter cloacae100%
100%Escherichia coli100%
100%Haemophilus influenzae100%
100%Klebsiella pneumoniae100%
100%Neisseria meningitidis100%
100%Proteus mirabilis100%
100%Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae100%Acinetobacter baumannii100%
100%Citrobacter freundii100%
100%Enterobacter cloacae100%
100%Escherichia coli100%
100%Haemophilus influenzae100%
100%Klebsiella oxytoca100%
100%Neisseria meningitidis100%
100%Proteus mirabilis100%
100%Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%
Neisseria meningitidis100%Acinetobacter baumannii100%
100%Citrobacter freundii100%
100%Enterobacter cloacae100%
100%Escherichia coli100%
100%Haemophilus influenzae100%
100%Klebsiella oxytoca100%
100%Klebsiella pneumoniae100%
100%Proteus mirabilis100%
100%Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%
Proteus mirabilis100%Acinetobacter baumannii100%
100%Citrobacter freundii100%
100%Enterobacter cloacae100%
100%Escherichia coli100%
100%Haemophilus influenzae100%
100%Klebsiella oxytoca100%
100%Klebsiella pneumoniae100%
100%Neisseria meningitidis100%
100%Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%
Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%Acinetobacter baumannii100%
100%Citrobacter freundii100%
100%Enterobacter cloacae100%
100%Escherichia coli100%
100%Haemophilus influenzae100%
100%Klebsiella oxytoca100%
100%Klebsiella pneumoniae100%
100%Neisseria meningitidis100%

Page 39

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 34 of 47

On‐Panel High Concentration TargetPositivityOn‐Panel Low Concentration TargetPositivity
100%Proteus mirabilis100%

Table 13: LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay Microbial Interference Summary

On‐Panel Low Concentration TargetPositivityOff‐Panel High Concentration TargetPositivity
Acinetobacter baumannii100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%
Citrobacter freundii100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%
Enterobacter cloacae100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%
Escherichia coli100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%
Haemophilus influenzae100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%

Page 40

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 35 of 47

On‐Panel Low Concentration TargetPositivityOff‐Panel High Concentration TargetPositivity
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%
Klebsiella oxytoca100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%
Klebsiella pneumoniae100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%
Neisseria meningitidis100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%
Proteus mirabilis100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%
Pseudomonas aeruginosa100%Bacillus cereus0%
100%Clostridium perfringens0%
100%Corynebacterium striatum0%
100%Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes0%
100%Staphylococcus aureus0%
100%Staphylococcus epidermidis0%
100%Streptococcus mitis0%

Interfering Substances

The interfering substances study was performed to evaluate the performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay in the presence of non‐microbial (endogenous and exogenous) interfering substances which may be present in blood culture specimens. A set of four representative "on‐panel" organisms were tested to assess effectiveness of target detection in the presence of six interfering substances. Each interfering substance was tested across five replicates. In addition, a negative control (five replicates) was tested alongside the positive specimens to assess impact of the same interfering agents in specimens containing no target; additionally, a positive control (specimen without interfering substances) for all four targets was also tested to assess for detection capabilities.

All four targets demonstrated 100% positivity in the presence of all six interfering substances, and 0% target detection was observed in the negative control sample in the presence of the same interfering substances (Table 14). Additionally, 100% target detection was observed for the positive control for each target.

Table 14: LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay Interfering Substances Summary

Interfering SubstanceInterfering Substance ConcentrationTargetPositivity
N/AN/AAcinetobacter baumannii100%
Escherichia coli100%
Haemophilus influenzae100%
Neisseria meningitidis100%
Unconjugated Bilirubin20 mg/dLAcinetobacter baumannii100%
Escherichia coli100%
Haemophilus influenzae100%
Neisseria meningitidis100%
Negative Control0%
Conjugated Bilirubin20 mg/dLAcinetobacter baumannii100%
Escherichia coli100%
Haemophilus influenzae100%
Neisseria meningitidis100%
Negative Control0%
Hemoglobin14 g/LAcinetobacter baumannii100%
Escherichia coli100%
Haemophilus influenzae100%
Neisseria meningitidis100%
Negative Control0%
Intralipid3000 mg/dLAcinetobacter baumannii100%
Escherichia coli100%
Haemophilus influenzae100%
Neisseria meningitidis100%
Negative Control0%

Page 41

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 36 of 47

Interfering SubstanceInterfering Substance ConcentrationTargetPositivity
γ‐globulin6 g/dLAcinetobacter baumannii100%
Escherichia coli100%
Haemophilus influenzae100%
Neisseria meningitidis100%
Negative Control0%
Sodium polyanetholsulfonate (SPS)0.25% w/vAcinetobacter baumannii100%
Escherichia coli100%
Haemophilus influenzae100%
Neisseria meningitidis100%
Negative Control0%

Carry‐Over/Cross Contamination

This study was performed to evaluate the risk of carry‐over and cross contamination occurring during normal use of the device when highly concentrated positive specimens are processed alongside negative specimens. Two operators tested 30 high concentration positive samples consisting of Morganella morganii at a final concentration of 2.74E+09 CFU/mL and 30 negative samples consisting of Negative Blood Matrix. This concentration of Morganella morganii was selected as the representative analyte for the high positive control since it was the highest concentration material from the LIAISON PLEX® Growth and Detection study Ring Positive + 8 hours growths, thus representing the most challenging scenario for potential cross contamination. Testing was performed on one LIAISON PLEX® instrument containing 6 blades/modules over the course of four days. The samples were loaded into cartridges alternating between positive and negative samples (checkerboard fashion), six specimens at a time using sample prep trays. The results, presented in Table 15, demonstrate 100% agreement between expected and observed results, indicating that no cross contamination occurred within runs and no carry‐over was observed across runs.

Table 15. Overall Results

Overall Percent Agreement between Expected and Observed Results100%
Morganella morganii Positivity in High Positive Control Replicates100%
Morganella morganii Positivity in Negative Control Replicates0%

h. Assay Cut‐off

The specific assay parameters for the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay are considered confidential and proprietary.

Page 42

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 37 of 47

2. Comparison Studies:

a. Method comparison with predicate device:

Refer to Section 3 Clinical Performance.

b. Matrix Comparison: Testing of Blood Culture Bottle Types / Matrix Equivalency

The performance of LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay was evaluated across 12 different types of commercially available blood culture media bottles using representative on‐panel BCN targets with resistance markers, off‐panel (gram‐positive) LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay targets, and negative blood matrix (NBM). The results, presented in Table 16, demonstrate that all 12 bottle types are compatible with the LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay. A total of 650 independent blood culture bottles were evaluated, which included 506 gram‐negative bottle cultures, 120 gram‐positive bottle cultures, and 24 negative blood matrix bottles; see Table 16, final row. The effectiveness of bioMerieux BACT/ALERT® FA Plus blood culture bottle – was established through blood culture growth required for all other analytical studies, such as growth and detection and analytical reactivity/inclusivity verification testing, and was not included in testing performed for the media equivalency study.

Table 16: LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay Media Equivalency/ Universal Blood Culture Bottle Result Summary

Manufacturer SystemBlood Culture Bottle ManufacturerBlood Culture Bottle TypeNumber of Inoculated BottlesNegative Blood Matrix^b (Negative Detection)
Gram‐Negative Bacteria (Positive Detection)Gram‐positive Bacteria (Negative Detection)
Biomerieux BACT/ALERT® 3D SystemBiomerieux BACT/ALERT®BACT/ALERT® SA (Aerobic)21/2110/102/2
BACT/ALERT® SN (Anaerobic)58/5810/102/2
BACT/ALERT® FN Plus (Anaerobic)21/2110/102/2
BACT/ALERT® PF Plus (Pediatric)63/6310/102/2
N/A^aBecton Dickinson^a BACTEC™BACTEC™ Standard21/2110/102/2
BACTEC™ Plus (Aerobic)21/2110/102/2
BACTEC™ Standard (Anaerobic)50/5010/102/2
BACTEC™ Plus (Anaerobic)58/5810/102/2
BACTEC™ Peds Plus (Pediatric)63/6310/102/2
BACTEC™ Lytic (Anaerobic)20/2010/102/2
N/A^aThermo Scientific^a VersaTREK™REDOX™ 1 EZ Draw™ (Aerobic)60/6010/102/2

Page 43

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 38 of 47

Manufacturer SystemBlood Culture Bottle ManufacturerBlood Culture Bottle TypeNumber of Inoculated BottlesNegative Blood Matrix^b (Negative Detection)
Gram‐Negative Bacteria (Positive Detection)Gram‐positive Bacteria (Negative Detection)
REDOX™ 2 EZ Draw™ (Anaerobic)50/5010/102/2
Number of Expected Calls/Total Number of Independent Blood Bottles506/506 (100%)120/120 (100%)24/24 (100%)
650/650 (100%)

^a For gram‐negative blood culture preparation, BACTEC™ and VersaTREK™ systems were not available and corresponding media bottles were placed in a standard laboratory incubator with a shaker for growth. For gram‐positive blood culture growth, only VersaTREK™ bottles needed to be placed in a standard laboratory incubator with a shaker in lieu of VersaTREK™ system; BACT/ALERT ® and BACTEC™ blood bottles were grown using corresponding automated blood culture systems up to bottle ring positivity.

^b Negative Blood Matrix (NBM) was tested using two independent blood inoculations per bottle type and each NBM sample was tested in replicates of three (total six replicates per bottle type) per study design; 72 total runs from 24 total bottle inoculations.

The average concentrations of each organism grown in 12 different types of media bottles are shown in Table 17; representing the approximate concentrations obtained from a mono‐bacterial blood culture used in this testing.

Table 17: Concentration of Blood Cultures in Different Media Bottles Used in Testing

Gram‐Negative (On‐panel) Organism*Expected ResultStrain IDAverage Positive Blood Culture Concentration (CFU/mL)
Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter spp., Acinetobacter baumanii, OXAIHMA 1283073.03E+08
Acinetobacter lwoffiiAcinetobacter spp.ATCC 153092.05E+08
Citrobacter freundiiEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Citrobacter spp., VIMIHMA 5498131.03E+09
Citrobacter amalonaticusEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Citrobacter spp.ATCC 254059.87E+09
Enterobacter cloacaeEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Enterobacter spp.ATCC 350301.16E+09
Enterobacter aerogenesEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Enterobacter spp.ATCC 350299.50E+09
Proteus mirabilisEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Proteus spp.ATCC 124536.64E+08
Proteus vulgarisEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Proteus spp.ATCC 299054.54E+08
Salmonella bongoriEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Salmonella spp.ATCC 439751.42E+09

Page 44

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 39 of 47

Gram‐Negative (On‐panel) Organism*Expected ResultStrain IDAverage Positive Blood Culture Concentration (CFU/mL)
Salmonella enterica subsp. arizonaeEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Salmonella spp.ATCC 133141.67E+09
Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, IMPIHMA 5766024.88E+08
Pseudomonas mendocinaPseudomonas spp.ATCC 254115.24E+08
Klebsiella oxytocaEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Klebsiella oxytoca, CTX‐MIHMA 6830797.29E+08
Klebsiella pneumoniaeEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, KPCIHMA 6296306.61E+08
Klebsiella variicolaEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Klebsiella variicolaClinical Isolate V05121.28E+09
Escherichia coliEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Escherichia coli, MCRNCTC 138461.17E+09
Serratia marcescensEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Serratia marcescens, SMEIHMA 16422091.34E+09
Morganella morganiiEnterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae, Morganella morganii, NDMIHMA 6058731.28E+09
Haemophilus influenzaeHaemophilus influenzaeATCC 90076.70E+08
Neisseria meningitidisNeisseria meningitidisATCC 437443.07E+08
Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaStenotrophomonas maltophiliaATCC 7002694.18E+08
Gram‐Positive (Off‐panel) Organism*Expected ResultStrain IDAverage Positive Blood Culture Concentration (CFU/mL)
Enterococcus faecalisNo Target DetectedATCC 515757.51E+08
Enterococcus faeciumNo Target DetectedATCC 7002214.12E+08
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)No Target DetectedATCC BAA‐23122.07E+08
Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE)No Target DetectedATCC 359842.26E+08
Streptococcus agalactiaeNo Target DetectedATCC 123867.50E+08
Streptococcus constellatusNo Target DetectedATCC 278235.25E+08
Bacillus subtilisNo Target DetectedATCC 196598.50E+07
Bacillus cereus^aNo Target DetectedATCC 107024.4E+08
Corynebacterium diphtheriaeNo Target DetectedATCC 270103.74E+08
Corynebacterium striatumNo Target DetectedATCC 437353.48E+08
Listeria monocytogenesNo Target DetectedATCC 153137.58E+08

^a Concentration of Bacillus cereus representing single blood bottle culture in VersaTREK™ REDOX™2 EZ Draw™ Media.

*Genus and species taxonomies are ever evolving based on the latest research. The strain ID is a unique identifier that will not be changed by the supplier. Therefore, the strain ID assigned by the supplier should be the reference

Page 45

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 40 of 47

used for that material. The genus and species should be for reference purposes only.

3. Clinical Performance:

A multi‐site clinical study established the diagnostic accuracy of the LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture (BCN) Assay for the detection and identification of pathogenic gram‐negative organisms in positive blood culture. The clinical performance of the LIAISON® PLEX BCN Assay was evaluated using clinical specimens prospectively collected between March 2024 and July 2024 from four geographically diverse clinical sites within the United States. The clinical study utilized remnant, de‐identified blood culture specimens collected from patients exhibiting clinical signs and symptoms of bloodstream infection, evidenced by positive identification by a continuous monitoring blood culture system.

A total of 381 unique prospectively collected specimens that met the pre‐determined inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Clinical runs and re‐runs using the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay were tested on the LIAISON PLEX® System by trained operators at four clinical sites. For targets that exhibited low prevalence rates in the prospective study, the prospective specimen set was supplemented with 231 pre‐selected left‐over, de‐identified specimens sourced from seven vendors in the United States and one site in Italy. The pre‐selected specimens were identified by Standard of Care (SoC) testing and confirmed as positive by VITEK 2 and/or PCR followed by bi‐directional sequencing (BDS) according to the reference method algorithm prior to enrollment in the study. To minimize bias, pre‐selected specimens were tested across the five sites in a randomized, blinded manner along with negative specimens.

Out of the 381 specimens enrolled in the prospective arm of the study, 30 prospective specimens were excluded from the analysis (one (1) duplicate patient enrollment, and 29 with incomplete reference testing results due to mixed growth, insufficient growth, or no growth).

Contrived specimens were tested to supplement the positive clinical specimens in the prospective and pre‐selected study cohorts for all targets. A total of 746 specimens were contrived, blinded, randomized, and tested along with negative specimens at four testing sites during April 2024– August 2024.

Table 18 provides a summary of the general demographic information of the 351 prospectively collected and 231 pre‐selected specimens that were included in the study analysis.

Table 18: LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay Summary of the General Demographic Information

Prospective (N =351)Pre‐selected (N=231)
# Specimens (%)# Specimens (%)
Gender
Male181 (51.6%)136 (58.9%)
Female170 (48.4%)91 (39.4%)
Gender Unknown0 (0.0%)4 (1.7%)
Total351 (100.0%)231 (100.0%)
Age (years)
0‐110 (2.8%)13 (5.6%)
>1‐53 (0.9%)2 (0.9%)
>5‐2110 (2.8%)4 (1.7%)

Page 46

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 41 of 47

Prospective (N =351)Pre‐selected (N=231)
# Specimens (%)# Specimens (%)
>21‐65142 (40.5%)90 (39.0%)
>65181 (51.6%)107 (46.3%)
Age Unknown5 (1.4%)15 (6.5%)
Total351 (100.0%)351 (100.0%)
Subject Status
Emergency Room68 (19.4%)2 (0.9%)
Hospitalized262 (74.6%)18 (7.8%)
Long‐Term Care2 (0.6%)0 (0.0%)
Outpatient1 (0.3%)0 (0.0%)
Status Unknown18 (5.1%)211 (91.3%)
Total351 (100.0%)231 (100.0%)
Blood Culture Bottle Type
BD BACTEC Lytic Anaerobic65(18.5%)8 (3.5%)
BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic61(17.4%)20 (8.7%)
BD BACTEC Standard Aerobic19(5.4%)89 (38.5%)
BacT/ALERT FA Plus72(20.5%)29 (12.6%)
BacT/ALERT FN Plus77(21.9%)‐ 26 (11.3%)
BacT/ALERT PF Plus3 (0.9%)0 (0.0%)
BacT/ALERT SA Standard Aerobic22(6.3%)0 (0.0%)
BacT/ALERT SN Standard Anaerobic16(4.6%)0 (0.0%)
BD BACTEC Plus Anaerobic1 (0.3%)0 (0.0%)
BD BACTEC Peds Plus10 (2.8%)1 (0.4%)
BD BACTEC (Unknown Aerobic)0 (0.0%)5 (2.2%)
BD BACTEC (Unknown Anaerobic)0 (0.0%)3 (1.3%)
BD BACTEC (Unknown)0 (0.0%)15 (6.5%)
Unknown Aerobic0 (0.0%)4 (1.7%)
Unknown Anaerobic0 (0.0%)1 (0.4%)
Bottle Type Unknown0 (0.0%)30 (13.0%)
Total351 (100.0%)231 (100.0%)

The LIASON PLEX® BCN Assay results were compared to culture followed by automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2, PCR followed by BDS, or a combination according to the algorithm described in Table 19 below.

Table 19 – Reference Method Algorithm

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay TargetComparator Method
Acinetobacter spp.Culture followed by Automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2
Citrobacter spp.
Enterobacter spp.
Enterobacteriaceae/Morganellaceae
Escherichia coli^(1)
Haemophilus influenzae
Morganella morganii

Page 47

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 42 of 47

LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay TargetComparator Method
Neisseria meningitidisCulture followed by Automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2
Proteus spp.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas spp.
Salmonella spp.
Serratia marcescens
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Acinetobacter baumanniiCulture followed by Automated microbiological/biochemical identification using VITEK 2 with positive confirmation of the clinical isolate by PCR/BDS
Klebsiella oxytoca
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Klebsiella variicola
CTX-M (blaCTX-M)PCR followed by bi-directional sequencing
IMP (blaIMP)
KPC (blaKPC)
NDM (blaNDM)
OXA (blaOXA)
VIM (blaVIM)
MCR
SME

^(1)The LIAISION PLEX® BCN Assay is not designed to distinguish between Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. (S. dysenteriae, S. boydii, S. flexneri, and S. sonnei).

Of the 582 clinical specimens collectively included in the prospective and pre‐selected study analysis (Arms 1 and 2 combined), 556 samples (95.5%) generated valid LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay results (i.e., Detected or Not Detected) on the first attempt. There were 26 specimens (4.5%) with an invalid result on the initial run. Of the 26 specimens retested, 24 (4.1%) specimens generated valid BCN results after a single retest for a final testing success rate of 99.7% (580/582).

For each target in the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay Panel, the diagnostic performance of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay was determined using Sensitivity/PPA and Specificity/NPA, along with the associated 95% confidence intervals, (95% CI as compared to the reference method). The results of the combined prospective and pre‐selected specimen analysis are summarized in Table 20.

Table 20 – Sensitivity/PPA and Specificity/NPA of Combined Prospective and Pre‐Selected Data Set

Pathogen TargetSensitivity/PPASpecificity/NPA
TP / (TP+FN)Sensitivity/ PPA (%)95% CITN / (TN+FP)Specificity/N PA (%)95% CI
Bacteria
Acinetobacter baumannii
Prospective0/0N/AN/A350/350100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected30/3196.8%83.8% ‐ 99.4%199/199100%98.1% ‐ 100%
Combined30/3196.8%83.8% ‐ 99.4%549/549100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Acinetobacter spp.
Prospective3/560%23.1% ‐ 88.2%345/345100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected33/3594.3%81.4% ‐ 98.4%195/195100%98.1% ‐ 100%
Combined36/40¹90%76.9% ‐ 96%540/540100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Citrobacter spp.
Prospective6/6100%61% ‐ 100%344/344100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected23/2495.8%79.8% ‐ 99.3%206/206100%98.2% ‐ 100%
Combined29/3096.7%83.3% ‐ 99.4%550/550100%99.3% ‐ 100%

Page 48

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 43 of 47

Pathogen TargetSensitivity/PPASpecificity/NPA
TP / (TP+FN)Sensitivity/ PPA (%)95% CITN / (TN+FP)Specificity/N PA (%)95% CI
Enterobacter spp.
Prospective20/20100%83.9% ‐ 100%330/330100%98.8% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected9/1090%59.6% ‐ 98.2%220/220100%98.3% ‐ 100%
Combined29/3096.7%83.3% ‐ 99.4%550/550100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Enterobacteriaceae/ Morganellaceae
Prospective305/30699.7%98.2% ‐ 99.9%44/44100%92% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected123/123100%97% ‐ 100%106/10799.1%94.9% ‐ 99.8%
Combined428/42999.8%98.7% ‐ 100%150/15199.3%96.3% ‐ 99.9%
Escherichia coli
Prospective178/17999.4%96.9% ‐ 99.9%169/17198.8%95.8% ‐ 99.7%
Pre‐selected1/1100%20.7% ‐ 100%229/229100%98.4% ‐ 100%
Combined179/18099.4%96.9% ‐ 99.9%398/400²99.5%98.2% ‐ 99.9%
Haemophilus influenzae
Prospective8/8100%67.6% ‐ 100%342/342100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected24/24100%86.2% ‐ 100%206/206100%98.2% ‐ 100%
Combined32/32100%89.3% ‐ 100%548/548100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Klebsiella oxytoca
Prospective9/9100%70.1% ‐ 100%340/34199.7%98.4% ‐ 99.9%
Pre‐selected26/2796.3%81.7% ‐ 99.3%203/203100%98.1% ‐ 100%
Combined35/3697.2%85.8% ‐ 99.5%543/544³99.8%99% ‐ 100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Prospective44/4597.8%88.4% ‐ 99.6%304/30599.7%98.2% ‐ 99.9%
Pre‐selected1/1100%20.7% ‐ 100%227/22999.1%96.9% ‐ 99.8%
Combined45/4697.8%88.7% ‐ 99.6%531/534⁴99.4%98.4% ‐ 99.8%
Klebsiella variicola
Prospective8/8100%67.6% ‐ 100%341/341100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected4/4100%51% ‐ 100%197/197100%98.1% ‐ 100%
Combined12/12100%75.8% ‐ 100%538/538100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Morganella morganii
Prospective3/3100%43.9% ‐ 100%347/347100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected5/5100%56.6% ‐ 100%225/225100%98.3% ‐ 100%
Combined8/8100%67.6% ‐ 100%572/572100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Neisseria meningitidis
Prospective0/0N/AN/A350/350100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected1/333.3%6.1% ‐ 79.2%227/227100%98.3% ‐ 100%
Combined1/3⁵33.3%6.1% ‐ 79.2%577/577100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Proteus spp.
Prospective23/23100%85.7% ‐ 100%327/327100%98.8% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected14/14100%78.5% ‐ 100%216/216100%98.3% ‐ 100%
Combined37/37100%90.6% ‐ 100%543/543100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Prospective28/2996.6%82.8% ‐ 99.4%321/321100%98.8% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected6/6100%61% ‐ 100%224/224100%98.3% ‐ 100%
Combined34/3597.1%85.5% ‐ 99.5%545/545100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Pseudomonas spp.
Prospective29/3096.7%83.3% ‐ 99.4%320/320100%98.8% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected7/7100%64.6% ‐ 100%223/223100%98.3% ‐ 100%
Combined36/3797.3%86.2% ‐ 99.5%543/543100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Salmonella spp.
Prospective1/1100%20.7% ‐ 100%349/349100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected16/16100%80.6% ‐ 100%214/214100%98.2% ‐ 100%
Combined17/17100%81.6% ‐ 100%563/563100%99.3% ‐ 100%
Serratia marcescens
Prospective9/9100%70.1% ‐ 100%340/34199.7%98.4% ‐ 99.9%
Pre‐selected20/20100%83.9% ‐ 100%209/21099.5%97.4% ‐ 99.9%

Page 49

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 44 of 47

Pathogen TargetSensitivity/PPASpecificity/NPA
TP / (TP+FN)Sensitivity/ PPA (%)95% CITN / (TN+FP)Specificity/N PA (%)95% CI
Combined29/29100%88.3% ‐ 100%549/55199.6%98.7% ‐ 99.9%
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Prospective1/1100%20.7% ‐ 100%349/349100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected10/10100%72.2% ‐ 100%219/22099.5%97.5% ‐ 99.9%
Combined11/11100%74.1% ‐ 100%568/56999.8%99% ‐ 100%
Resistance Marker Genes⁶
CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M)
Prospective40/4197.6%87.4% ‐ 99.6%295/29799.3%97.6% ‐ 99.8%
Pre‐selected5/5100%56.6% ‐ 100%169/169100%97.8% ‐ 100%
Combined45/4697.8%88.7% ‐ 99.6%464/46699.6%98.4% ‐ 99.9%
IMP (blaIMP)
Prospective0/0N/AN/A338/338100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected0/0N/AN/A174/174100%97.8% ‐ 100%
Combined0/0N/AN/A512/512100%99.3% ‐ 100%
KPC (blaKPC)
Prospective1/1100%20.7% ‐ 100%336/336100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected0/0N/AN/A164/164100%97.7% ‐ 100%
Combined1/1100%20.7% ‐ 100%500/500100%99.2% ‐ 100%
NDM (blaNDM)
Prospective0/0N/AN/A338/338100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected1/1100%20.7% ‐ 100%173/173100%97.8% ‐ 100%
Combined1/1100%20.7% ‐ 100%511/511100%99.3% ‐ 100%
OXA (blaOXA)
Prospective0/0N/AN/A332/33798.5%96.6% ‐ 99.4%
Pre‐selected26/26100%87.1% ‐ 100%137/13899.3%96% ‐ 99.9%
Combined26/26100%87.1% ‐ 100%469/47598.7%97.3% ‐ 99.4%
VIM (blaVIM)
Prospective0/0N/AN/A338/338100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected0/0N/AN/A174/174100%97.8% ‐ 100%
Combined0/0N/AN/A512/512100%99.3% ‐ 100%
MCR
Prospective0/0N/AN/A334/334100%98.9% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected0/0N/AN/A131/131100%97.2% ‐ 100%
Combined0/0N/AN/A465/465100%99.2% ‐ 100%
SME
Prospective0/0N/AN/A10/10100%72.2% ‐ 100%
Pre‐selected0/0N/AN/A21/21100%84.5% ‐ 100%
Combined0/0N/AN/A31/31100%89% ‐ 100%

¹Clinical isolates from 2/4 Acinetobacter spp. false negative specimens were negative for Acinetobacter spp. by BDS.
²The clinical isolate from 1/2 Escherichia coli false positive specimens was positive for Escherichia coli by BDS.
³The Klebsiella oxytoca false positive specimen was positive for Klebsiella oxytoca by Standard of Care.
⁴Two of the three (2/3) Klebsiella pneumoniae false positive specimens were positive for Klebsiella pnuemoniae by Standard of Care.
⁵Both Neisseria meningitidis false negative specimens were positive by another FDA-cleared molecular assay.
⁶The LIAISON PLEX® BCN assay will report the presence or absence of resistance markers only if an applicable organism is also detected, therefore the total number of evaluable samples for each resistance marker is dependent on the number of applicable organisms enrolled.

Out of the 746 specimens included in the contrived study analysis, 717 specimens (96.1%) generated valid LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay results (i.e., Detected or Not Detected) on the first attempt. There were 29 specimens (3.9%) with an invalid result on the initial run. Of the 29 specimens retested, 28 (3.8%) specimens generated a valid result after a single retest for a final

Page 50

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 45 of 47

testing success rate of 99.9% (745/746).

The performance (Sensitivity/PPA and Specificity/NPA) of the LIAISION PLEX® BCN Assay for contrived specimens is presented separately in Table 21.

Table 21 – Sensitivity/PPA and Specificity/NPA for the Contrived Data Set

Pathogen TargetSensitivity/PPASpecificity/NPA
AnalyteTP / (TP+FN)Sensitivity/ PPA (%)95% CITN / (TN+FP)Specificity/NPA (%)95% CI
Bacterial Identification
Acinetobacter baumannii25/25100%86.7% ‐ 100%720/720100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Acinetobacter spp.45/45100%92.1% ‐ 100%700/700100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Citrobacter spp.32/32100%89.3% ‐ 100%713/713100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Enterobacter spp.54/54100%93.4% ‐ 100%691/691100%99.4% ‐ 100%
Enterobacteriaceae/ Morganellaceae460/460100%99.2% ‐ 100%284/28599.6%98% ‐ 99.9%
Escherichia coli41/41100%91.4% ‐ 100%704/704100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Haemophilus influenzae0/00%0% ‐ 0%745/745100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Klebsiella oxytoca20/20100%83.9% ‐ 100%725/725100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Klebsiella pneumoniae46/46100%92.3% ‐ 100%698/69999.9%99.2% ‐ 100%
Klebsiella variicola50/50100%92.9% ‐ 100%695/695100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Morganella morganii62/62100%94.2% ‐ 100%683/683100%99.4% ‐ 100%
Neisseria meningitidis50/50100%92.9% ‐ 100%695/695100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Proteus spp.30/30100%88.6% ‐ 100%715/715100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Pseudomonas aeruginosa35/3697.2%85.8% ‐ 99.5%709/709100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Pseudomonas spp.57/5898.3%90.9% ‐ 99.7%687/687100%99.4% ‐ 100%
Salmonella spp.70/70100%94.8% ‐ 100%675/675100%99.4% ‐ 100%
Serratia marcescens55/55100%93.5% ‐ 100%690/690100%99.4% ‐ 100%
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia49/49100%92.7% ‐ 100%696/696100%99.5% ‐ 100%
Resistance Marker Genes¹
CTX‐M (blaCTX‐M)105/105100%96.5% ‐ 100%305/30699.7%98.2% ‐ 99.9%
IMP (blaIMP)54/54100%93.4% ‐ 100%357/357100%98.9% ‐ 100%
KPC (blaKPC)61/61100%94.1% ‐ 100%350/350100%98.9% ‐ 100%
NDM (blaNDM)67/67100%94.6% ‐ 100%344/344100%98.9% ‐ 100%
OXA (blaOXA)35/35100%90.1% ‐ 100%375/37699.7%98.5% ‐ 100%
VIM (blaVIM)50/50100%92.9% ‐ 100%361/361100%98.9% ‐ 100%
MCR50/50100%92.9% ‐ 100%326/326100%98.8% ‐ 100%
SME50/50100%92.9% ‐ 100%5/5100%56.6% ‐ 100%

¹The LIAISON PLEX® BCN assay will report the presence or absence of resistance markers only if an applicable organism is also detected, therefore the total number of evaluable samples for each resistance marker is dependent on the number of applicable organisms enrolled.

Page 51

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 46 of 47

The pre‐defined acceptance criteria for the clinical study were:

  • The assay shall achieve a target Sensitivity/Positive Percent Agreement of ≥90% for all targets except Klebsiella oxytoca and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia which shall achieve ≥85%.
  • The Specificity/Negative Percent Agreement for each target should be established at a level of ≥95%.
  • Failure rate shall be ≤10%.

Acceptance Criteria are based on Prospective, Pre‐selected, and Contrived sets combined.

As all predefined acceptance criteria were met, the study results demonstrate that the diagnostic accuracy of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is acceptable for the safe and effective detection and identification of gram‐negative pathogens from blood culture media identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram‐negative organism as determined by Gram stain from patients exhibiting clinical signs and symptoms of bloodstream infection.

N. Proposed Labeling:

The labeling provided in the submission satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR 809.10.

O. Conclusion:

The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.

Page 52

LIAISON PLEX® Gram‐Negative Blood Culture Assay Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary Page 47 of 47

The pre‐defined acceptance criteria for the clinical study were:

  • The assay shall achieve a target Sensitivity/Positive Percent Agreement of ≥90% for all targets except Klebsiella oxytoca and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia which shall achieve ≥85%.
  • The Specificity/Negative Percent Agreement for each target should be established at a level of ≥95%.
  • Failure rate shall be ≤10%.

Acceptance Criteria are based on Prospective, Pre‐selected, and Contrived sets combined.

As all predefined acceptance criteria were met, the study results demonstrate that the diagnostic accuracy of the LIAISON PLEX® BCN Assay is acceptable for the safe and effective detection and identification of gram‐negative pathogens from blood culture media identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram‐negative organism as determined by Gram stain from patients exhibiting clinical signs and symptoms of bloodstream infection.

N. Proposed Labeling:

The labeling provided in the submission satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR 809.10.

O. Conclusion:

The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.