(117 days)
Not Found
No
The summary does not mention AI, ML, or any related terms, and the description of performance studies focuses on compliance with standards and validation testing, not AI/ML model performance metrics.
No
The device is described as a "mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system" used for "radiological guidance and visualization" during procedures. Its purpose is to provide images for diagnosis and real-time guidance, not to directly treat a condition.
Yes
The device description explicitly states, "The proposed Zenition 90 is a mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system."
No
The device description clearly states it is a "mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system" comprising a "C-arm stand and a Mobile View Station (MVS)," indicating it includes significant hardware components beyond just software.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is for "radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures." This describes a device used on the patient's body to produce images, not a device used to examine specimens from the body (like blood, urine, or tissue) in a laboratory setting.
- Device Description: The device is a "mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system." This is a medical imaging device, not a diagnostic test performed on biological samples.
- Input Imaging Modality: The input is "X-ray," which is a form of radiation used for imaging the internal structures of the body. IVDs typically analyze biological or chemical properties of specimens.
- Anatomical Site: While not explicitly stated, the listed applications (Orthopedic, Neuro, Abdominal, Vascular, Thoracic, Cardiac) clearly indicate the device is used to image various parts of the human body.
- Lack of IVD characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples, reagents, or laboratory procedures, which are hallmarks of IVD devices.
In summary, the device described is a medical imaging system used for visualizing internal structures of the body, which falls under the category of medical devices, but not specifically In Vitro Diagnostics.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The device is used for radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures on all patients. The device is to be used in health care facilities both inside and outside the operating room, sterile as well as non-sterile environment in a variety of procedures.
Applications:
- Orthopedic
- Neuro
- Abdominal
- Vascular
- Thoracic
- Cardiac
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
OWB, JAA, OXO
Device Description
The proposed Zenition 90 is a mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system. It is designed for medical use in healthcare facilities where X-ray imaging is needed. The system comprises of two main components: the C-arm stand and a Mobile View Station (MVS).
Mentions image processing
Yes
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
X-ray
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
all patients
Intended User / Care Setting
health care professionals who have full understanding of the safety information and emergency procedures as well as the capabilities and functions of the device.
The device is to be used in health care facilities both inside and outside the operating room, sterile as well as non-sterile environment in a variety of procedures.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Non-clinical performance testing has been performed on the proposed Zenition 90 and it demonstrates compliance with the following International and FDA-recognized consensus standards and FDA guidance document:
- IEC 60601-1, Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance (Edition 3.2 2020-08). FDA/CDRH recognition number 19-49.
- ANSI AAMI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012 C1:2009/(R)2012 and A2:2010/(R)2012 ● (Consolidated Text) FDA/CDRH recognition number 19-4
- o IEC 60601-2-43 - Particular requirements for the safety of X-Ray equipment for interventional procedures (Edition 2.2, 2019). FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-329.
- IEC 60601-2-54, Medical Electrical Equipment- Part 2-54: Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety and Essential Performance of X-Ray Equipment for Radiography and Radioscopy (Edition 1.2 2018). FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-317.
- IEC 60601-1-2. Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safetv and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and tests (Edition 4.1 2020). FDA/CDRH recognition number 19-36.
- . IEC 60601-1-3, Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-3: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance.-Collateral Standard: Radiation Protection in Diagnostic X-Ray Equipment. (Edition 2.1 2013). FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-269
- IEC 60601-1-6, Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-6: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance- Collateral Standard: Usability (Edition 3.1 2013). FDA/CDRH recognition number 5-89.
- IEC 62304 Medical device software Software life cycle processes (Edition 1.1, 2015). ● FDA/CDRH recognition number 13-79.
- . ISO 14971 Medical devices - Application of risk management to medical devices (Edition 3.0, corrected version, 2019). FDA/CDRH recognition number 5-125.
- . IEC 62366-1 Medical devices - Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices (Edition 1.1 2020-06 CONSOLIDATED VERSION). FDA/CDRH recognition number 5-129
- Pediatric information for x-ray imaging device premarket notifications, Nov 28, 2017 (document number 1771)
- o Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions, June 14, 2023 (document number GUI00000337)
- Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices, Feb 03, 2016 ● (document number (1757)
- Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions, September 27, 2023 (document number GUI00001825)
- Radio frequency wireless technology in medical devices- Guidance for Industry and Food and ● Drug Administration Staff, Aug 14, 2013 (document number 1618).
- Guidance for the Submission of 510(k)s for Solid State X-ray Imaging Devices: Guidance for ● Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff, Sep 01, 2016 (document number 644)
Non-clinical validation testing has been performed to cover the intended use, commercial claims, service, user needs, effectiveness of safety measures, instructions for use, and usability testing with representative intended users. The Subject device Zenition 90 meets the acceptance criteria and is adequate for its intended use.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 892.1650 Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. An image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system is a device intended to visualize anatomical structures by converting a pattern of x-radiation into a visible image through electronic amplification. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). An anthrogram tray or radiology dental tray intended for use with an image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9. In addition, when intended as an accessory to the device described in paragraph (a) of this section, the fluoroscopic compression device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
May 22, 2024
Philips Medical Systems Nederlands B.V. % Rahul Kumar Sinha Regulatory Approbation Officer Veenpluis 6 Best. NB 5684 PC NETHERLANDS
Re: K240224
Trade/Device Name: Zenition 90 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1650 Regulation Name: Image-Intensified Fluoroscopic X-Ray System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OWB, JAA, OXO Dated: January 25, 2024 Received: April 22, 2024
Dear Rahul Kumar Sinha:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
1
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Lu Jiang
Lu Jiang, Ph.D. Assistant Director Diagnostic X-Ray Systems Team DHT8B: Division of Radiologic Imaging Devices and Electronic Products OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
2
Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K240224
Device Name
Zenition 90
Indications for Use (Describe)
The device is used for radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures on all patients. The device is to be used in health care facilities both inside and outside the operating room, sterile as well as non-sterile environment in a variety of procedures. Applications:
- · Orthopedic
- · Neuro
- Abdominal
- · Vascular
- · Thoracic
- · Cardiac
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
PHILIPS - IGT Systems 510(k) Number: K240224
510 (k) Summary
The 510(k) Summary is given in the below pages.
4
510(k) Summary
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is prepared in accordance with 21 CFR §807.92.
Date Prepared | January 25, 2024 | |
---|---|---|
Manufacturer: | Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. | |
Veenpluis 6 | ||
5684 PC Best | ||
The Netherlands | ||
Establishment Registration Number: 3003768277 | ||
Primary | ||
Contact | ||
Person: | Rahul Kumar Sinha | |
Regulatory Approbation Officer | ||
Phone: +91 9940259360 | ||
E-mail: rahulkumar.sinha@philips.com | ||
Secondary | ||
Contact | ||
Person: | Neena Sonavane | |
Regulatory Affairs Leader | ||
Phone: +91-8446020023 | ||
E-mail: neena.sonavane@philips.com | ||
Device: | Trade Name: | Zenition 90 |
Classification Name: | Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system | |
Classification Regulation: | 21CFR §892.1650 | |
Classification Panel: | 90-Radiology | |
Device Class: | Class II | |
Primary Product Code: | OWB | |
Secondary Product Code: | JAA, OXO | |
Primary | ||
Predicate | ||
Device: | Trade Name: | Zenition 70 |
Manufacturer: | Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. | |
510(k) Clearance: | K212813 | |
Classification Name: | Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system | |
Classification Regulation: | 21CFR §892.1650 | |
Classification Panel: | 90-Radiology | |
Device Class: | Class II | |
Product Code: | OWB; JAA; OXO |
5
Device The proposed Zenition 90 is a mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system. It is designed for description: medical use in healthcare facilities where X-ray imaging is needed. The system comprises of two main components: the C-arm stand and a Mobile View Station (MVS).
The proposed Zenition 90 is used for radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, Indications for interventional and surgical procedures on all patients. The device is to be used in health care facilities Use: both inside and outside the operating room, sterile as well as non-sterile environment in a variety of procedures.
Applications:
- Orthopedic
- . Neuro
- Abdominal ●
- Vascular ●
- Thoracic
- . Cardiac
The proposed Zenition 90 demonstrates substantial equivalence with predicate Zenition 70 in terms of intended use. and do not raise questions of safety and effectiveness.
| Table 1. Indications for use comparison of the proposed Zenition 90 versus the currently
marketed and predicate device, Zenition 70 | ||
---|---|---|
Predicate Device Zenition 70 | Proposed Zenition 90 | Conclusion |
Indications for Use | ||
The Zenition 70 device is | ||
intended to be used and | ||
operated by: adequately | ||
trained, qualified and | ||
authorized health care | ||
professionals who have full | ||
understanding of the safety | ||
information and emergency | ||
procedures as well as the | ||
capabilities and functions of the | ||
device. |
The device is used for
radiological guidance and
visualization during diagnostic,
interventional and surgical
procedures on all patients,
except neonates (birth to one
month), within the limits of the
device. The device is to be used
in health care facilities both
inside and outside the operating
room, sterile as well as non-
sterile environment in a variety
of procedures.
Applications:
● Orthopedic
● Neuro
● Abdominal | The device is used for
radiological guidance and
visualization during diagnostic,
interventional and surgical
procedures on all patients. The
device is to be used in health care
facilities both inside and outside
the operating room, sterile as well
as non-sterile environment in a
variety of procedures.
Applications:
● Orthopedic
● Neuro
● Abdominal
● Vascular
● Thoracic
● Cardiac | Substantially Equivalent
SE analysis:
Same
The proposed Zenition 90 is
used for all patients including
neonates (birth to one month).
The safety and effectiveness is
in line with FDA guidance
"Pediatric information for x-
ray imaging device premarket
notifications"
Therefore, proposed Zenition
90 demonstrates substantial
equivalence with predicate
Zenition 70 in terms of
intended use and is safe and
effective. |
6
• Vascular | ||
---|---|---|
• Thoracic | ||
• Cardiac |
Fundamental Scientific Technology:
The proposed Zenition 90 employs the same basic construction and fundamental scientific technology as the currently marketed and predicate Zenition 70. The technology used in the development of the major components of the proposed Zenition 90, which includes X-ray generator, X-ray tube housing assembly, and Image detection system is similar to the currently marketed and predicate Zenition 70.
Table 2 shows that the proposed Zenition 90 is considered substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate, Zenition 70 in terms of major components and technological characteristics.
7
| Component
/feature | Currently market
Zenition 70 | Proposed Zenition
90 | Conclusion |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| C-arm
motions and
brakes | Manual | Motorized | The c-arm movements are motorized in
Zenition 90 as against manual in Zenition 70.
The Zenition 70 system provide manual brake
levers to release and lock the brakes while
Zenition 90 system uses electromagnetic
brakes to release or lock the c-arm axis to
simplify the workflow.
Motorized movement and the electromagnetic
brakes are an added advantage in Zenition 90
compared to the equivalent devices Zenition
70.
Zenition 90 introduces motorized movement in
3 axis (angulation, rotation, and longitudinal)
that are manual in Zenition 70.
Conclusion:
Similar and substantially equivalent |
| X-ray
Generator | -Peak output power:
15 kW | -Peak output power:
15kW/25kW | The kV range of proposed Zenition 90 is the
same as compared to the predicate Zenition 70.
The maximum mA of the Zenition 90 (15kW)
is the same compared to the Zenition 70.
While in Zenition 90 we also have a 25kW
version, where higher mA is possible.
Make of Generators are different in both the
devices however, the technology, energy
source and output are similar.
This change does not impact the safety and
effectiveness of the device. Thus,
demonstrating substantial equivalence.
Conclusion:
Similar and substantially equivalent |
| X-ray tube | -Rotating Anode
(Model: RTM 780
H (Type RO-0306) | - Rotating Anode
(Model: RTM 780 H
(Type RO-0306) | The design and characteristics of X-ray tube of
subject device Zenition 90 and the predicate
device Zenition 70 are the same and from same
supplier.
Conclusion:
Same and substantially equivalent |
| | -Focal spot: dual
(0.3 & 0.6)
-Target angle: 10° | Focal spot: dual (0.3
& 0.6)
Target angle: 10° | |
| | -Anode heat
content: 225kJ | Anode heat content:
225kJ | |
| | -Maximum anode
cooling rate: 550W | Maximum anode
cooling rate: 550W | |
| | -Nominal anode
input power: 15kW | -Nominal anode input
power: 15kW | |
| | | -Nominal anode input
power: 25kW | |
| Monoblock | | | The Monoblock is the combination of x-ray
tube, transformer, cooling oil and oil pump. |
| Oil
circulation | Active oil
circulation with AC
Pump | Active oil circulation
with DC Pump | The proposed device Zenition 90 has similar
heat performance compared to the predicate |
| Monoblock
heat content | Monoblock heat
content: 1350kJ | Monoblock heat
content: 1350kJ | device Zenition 70. There are no technological
significant difference in the safety and clinical
performance of the devices. |
| Safety
mechanisms | Safety mechanisms:
Thermal Switch | Safety mechanisms:
Thermal Switch | Proposed device Zenition 90 uses DC oil pump
while the predicate Zenition 70 uses AC oil |
| Inherent
filtration | filtration | filtration | pump. DC Pump in Zenition 90 helps for better
Oil circulation with lower power consumption
which results in lower energy losses. |
| Fluoro time | fluoro time: 296W
for 60mins | fluoro time: 296W
for 60mins | Both the devices Zenition 70 and Zenition 90
use the same safety mechanism of thermal
switch to address undesirable overheating
scenarios. |
| | | | Conclusion:
Same and substantially equivalent |
| Flat Panel
Detector /
Image
Intensifier | | | The subject device Zenition 90 uses the same
flat panel detector which has been previously
cleared in predicate device Zenition 70
(K212813) and sourced from the same
supplier. |
| - Frame rate | Frame rate: 30fps | Frame rate: 30fps | |
| - Zoom
modes | Zoom modes:
Overview mode + 2
zoom modes | Zoom modes:
Overview mode + 2
zoom modes | |
| - Detector
size ( x/y) | -Detector size (x/y):
207mm x 207mm
(square) | Detector size (x/y):
207mm x 207mm
(square) | |
| | - Detector size (x/y):
301mm x 301mm
(square) | Detector size (x/y):
301mm x 301mm
(square) | |
| - Pixel pitch
- Image
matrix | pixel pitch: 154 $\mu$ m
Image matrix:
1344x1344
DQE: 77% | pixel pitch: 154 $\mu$ m
Image matrix:
1344x1344
DQE: 77% | |
| - "Detector
quantum
efficiency
(DQE) | Pixel pitch: 154 $\mu$ m | Pixel pitch: 154 $\mu$ m | |
| | Image matrix:
1000x1000
DQE: 77% | Image matrix:
1000x1000
DQE: 77% | Conclusion:
Same and substantially equivalent |
| Imaging
Processing | Xres-3 | Xres-3 | The predicate device Zenition 70 and the
proposed device Zenition 90 both use the same |
| | | | Conclusion: |
| | | | Same and substantially equivalent |
| Anti Scatter
Grid | Removable grid
(square) | Removable grid
(square) | The proposed Zenition 90 has same as of
predicate Zenition 70 |
| | Transmission: 70% | Transmission: 70% | Conclusion:
Same and substantially equivalent |
| Radiation
safety
features | Collimation | Collimation | Both the proposed device Zenition 90 and the
predicate device Zenition 70 share the same
radiation safety features. |
| | Anti-scatter grid | Anti-scatter grid | |
| | Fluoroscopy modes | Fluoroscopy modes | |
| | Pulsed fluoroscopy | Pulsed fluoroscopy | |
| | Recording and
storing fluoroscopic
runs | Recording and
storing fluoroscopic
runs | |
| | Last image hold | Last image hold | Conclusion:
Same and substantially equivalent |
| | Real-time dose
monitoring | Real-time dose
monitoring | |
| Beam
Limiting
Device
(Collimator) | Square (but round in
zooming and
rotation) | Square (but round in
zooming and
rotation) | The proposed Zenition 90 system uses the same
collimator as is in predicate device Zenition 70.
Conclusion:
Same and substantially equivalent |
| Geometry | Hammerhead design
Length : 206 x 82 x
162 cm | New design stand
Size: 206 x 82 x 162
cm | The proposed Zenition 90 new stand design
comes with lower C-arm operating forces,
provision to mount additional User Interface
monitor. This helps in maneuverability and
ease of use. |
| | Weight: 332 Kg | Weight:
400 kg (Motorized)
375 Kg (Non-
motorized) | The Proposed Zenition 90 stand brings higher
weight (400 kg) due to motorization in
comparison with Zenition 70 (Conclusion:
Similar and substantially equivalent. |
| Injector
interface | Manual Injection
possible. User can
manually add X-ray
delay from an
injector device | Integrated injector
interface where user
can add needed X-ray
delay based on
Injection volume.
Manual Injection is
also possible. | Manual Injector is always possible in both the
systems the proposed Zenition 90 as well as the
equivalent device Zenition 70. In addition to
manual injector, Zenition 90 has provision to
connect an external injector, so the user can add
X-ray start delay time based on injection
volume. Hence, clinically, no change is
introduced in the workflow by using integrated
Injector interface.
Thus, there is no significant difference in the
safety and effectiveness of the devices
Conclusion:
Similar and substantially equivalent. |
8
9
10
11
Based on the information provided above, the Zenition 90 is considered substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate Zenition 70 in terms of fundamental scientific technology.
Summary of Non-Clinical Performance Data:
Non-clinical performance testing has been performed on the proposed Zenition 90 and it demonstrates compliance with the following International and FDA-recognized consensus standards and FDA guidance document:
- IEC 60601-1, Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance (Edition 3.2 2020-08). FDA/CDRH recognition number 19-49.
- ANSI AAMI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012 C1:2009/(R)2012 and A2:2010/(R)2012 ● (Consolidated Text) FDA/CDRH recognition number 19-4
- o IEC 60601-2-43 - Particular requirements for the safety of X-Ray equipment for interventional procedures (Edition 2.2, 2019). FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-329.
- IEC 60601-2-54, Medical Electrical Equipment- Part 2-54: Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety and Essential Performance of X-Ray Equipment for Radiography and Radioscopy (Edition 1.2 2018). FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-317.
- IEC 60601-1-2. Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safetv and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and tests (Edition 4.1 2020). FDA/CDRH recognition number 19-36.
- . IEC 60601-1-3, Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-3: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance.-Collateral Standard: Radiation Protection in Diagnostic X-Ray Equipment. (Edition 2.1 2013). FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-269
- IEC 60601-1-6, Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-6: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance- Collateral Standard: Usability (Edition 3.1 2013). FDA/CDRH recognition number 5-89.
- IEC 62304 Medical device software Software life cycle processes (Edition 1.1, 2015). ● FDA/CDRH recognition number 13-79.
12
- . ISO 14971 Medical devices - Application of risk management to medical devices (Edition 3.0, corrected version, 2019). FDA/CDRH recognition number 5-125.
- . IEC 62366-1 Medical devices - Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices (Edition 1.1 2020-06 CONSOLIDATED VERSION). FDA/CDRH recognition number 5-129
- Pediatric information for x-ray imaging device premarket notifications, Nov 28, 2017 (document number 1771)
- o Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions, June 14, 2023 (document number GUI00000337)
- Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices, Feb 03, 2016 ● (document number (1757)
- Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions, September 27, 2023 (document number GUI00001825)
- Radio frequency wireless technology in medical devices- Guidance for Industry and Food and ● Drug Administration Staff, Aug 14, 2013 (document number 1618).
- Guidance for the Submission of 510(k)s for Solid State X-ray Imaging Devices: Guidance for ● Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff, Sep 01, 2016 (document number 644)
Non-clinical validation testing has been performed to cover the intended use, commercial claims, service, user needs, effectiveness of safety measures, instructions for use, and usability testing with representative intended users. The Subject device Zenition 90 meets the acceptance criteria and is adequate for its intended use.
Substantial The Zenition 90 is substantial equivalent to the currently marketed predicate device Zenition 70 Equivalence (K212813), in terms of indications for use, fundamental scientific technology, safety and effectiveness. Conclusion: