AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System is indicated for use in knee arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1) Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis; 2) Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis; 3) Correction of functional deformity; 4) Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. The EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System implants are for cemented use only.

GUARDIAN™ Limb Salvage Hip Components: Indicated for use in total hip arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved hip function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1) non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusio acetabuli. and painful hip dysplasia; 2) inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis; 3) correction of functional deformity; 4) revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and, 5) treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. Limb salvage system is also indicated for procedures where radical resection and replacement of the proximal, distal and/ or total femur is required with the following conditions: 1) patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the hip that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment; 2) surgical intervention for severe trauma, revision hip arthroplasties, and/or Oncology indications. 3) metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors)

The GUARDIANTM Limb Salvage Knee Components: Indicated for cemented use in knee arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved knee function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1) noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, or avascular necrosis; 2) inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis; 3) correction of functional deformity; 4) revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and 5) treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. Limb salvage system is also indicated for procedures where radical resection and replacement of the proximal tibia is required with the following conditions: 1) patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the knee that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment: 2) surgical intervention for severe trauma, revision knee arthroplasties, and/or Oncology indications. 3) metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors)

The DCW Modular Distal Femoral System is primarily indicated for procedures in which a variable resection length prosthesis is necessary to accommodate the condition of the femur, e.g. bone loss/removal in disease-related knee arthroplasty or a distally fractured femur. It is also indicated for revious total knee replacement where the femoral prosthesis has loosened, broken, or requires surgical removal for another medical reason. These indications are intended to provide relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients.

Limb salvage surgery is indicated for cemented procedures where radical resection and replacement of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia is required with the following conditions: 1. patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the knee that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment; 2. surgical intervention for severe trauma. revision knee arthroplasties, and/or oncology indications. 3. metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors)

The EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System is indicated for use in knee arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1. noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis; 2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis; 3. correction of functional deformity: 4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. The EVOLUTION® Total Knee System nonporous components are for cemented use only. The EVOLUTION® Total Knee System porous components are for use without bone cement.

The ADVANCE® Total Knee System components are indicated for use in total knee arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved knee function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1) noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, or avascular necrosis; 2) inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis; 3) correction of functional deformity: 4) revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and 5) treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. The ADVANCE® Total Knee System is for single use. The Advance Total Knee System porous components are for use without bone cement. The Advance Total Knee System non-porous components are for use with bone cement.

The Whiteside Condylar II™ Total Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis or traumatic arthritis, with or without moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities. The prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The device is intended for cemented use only.

The Whiteside ORTHOLOC™ Posterior Stabilized Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities, where posterior cruciate ligaments are inadequate, absent or unable to be preserved intraoperatively. The prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis where the cruciate ligaments are absent ligaments are intact. The device is intended for cemented use only.

The Whiteside ORTHOLOC® M.A. Total Knee System is indicated for use in conjunction with the metal tibial base of the Whiteside ORTHOLOC® II Total Knee System for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental or tricompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The device is intended for cemented use only.

The AXIOM ACL Retaining Tibial Tray and Tibial Insert are used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the tibial plateau of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. AXIOM ACL Retaining Tibial Tray and Tibial Insert are for cemented use only.

The A/P Curved Tibial Insert is used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the femoral condyles, tibial plateau and patella articulating surface of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. The A/P Curved Tibial Insert is intended for cemented application only.

The Second Generation Knee System is used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the femoral condyles, tibial plateau and patella articulating surface of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. The Second Generation Knee System is intended for cemented application only.

The Whiteside ORTHOLOC® Modular Posterior Stabilized Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities, where the posterior cruciate ligaments are inadequate, absent or unable to be preserved intraoperatively. This prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis. where the cruciate ligaments are absent. This device is intended for cemented use only.

The Modular Femoral Component and Constrained Tibial insert are used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the femoral condyles, tibial plateau and patella articulating surface of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. Additional indications specific to the Modular Femoral Component and Constrained Tibial Insert include use in patients with anterior/posterior, varus/valgus, and rotational joint instability resulting from inadequate or absent cruciate and collateral ligaments, or who's knee can not be stabilized by usual soft tissue management. This device is intended for single use in a cemented application only.

The ORTHOLOC® Tibial Plastic Insert, as part the ORTHOLOC® Total Knee System, is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The system is also indicated for revision of failed prosthesis where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intended for cemented use only.

Total knee arthroplasty has been proved effective in reducing pain and in restoring functional knee motion. Such surgical procedures have been used in the management of: painful disabling bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, theumatic arthritis; posttraumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy, moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities. The device may also be indicated in the salvage of previously failed surgical attempts. This device is intended for cemented use only.

The ORTHOLOC® ADVANTIM™ Posterior Stabilized Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities where the posterior cruciate ligaments are inadequate, absent or unable to be preserved intraoperatively. This prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis, where the cruciate ligaments are absent.

The ULTRACK™ Total Knee System is intended for bicompartmental replacement of the knee joint for reduction of pain or increased function for the following conditions: 1) Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, or avascular necrosis; 2) Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis; 3) Correction of functional deformity: 4) Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and 5) Treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. This device is intended for cemented use only.

Device Description

The subject devices include the following affected components: Tibial spacers manufactured from UHMWPE; Tibial hinge base with stop pins manufactured from UHMWPE, titanium alloy, and cobalt chromium alloys; Hinge bushings manufactured from UHMWPE; Tibial inserts manufactured from UHMWPE with locking screws and posts manufactured from titanium alloy, cobalt chromium tungsten allov, and cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy; Femoral axial pins manufactured from combination UHMWPE and cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy and combination high density polyethylene (HDPE) and cobalt chromium alloy; Yoke extension stops manufactured from UHMWPE; Patellae manufactured from UHMWPE and cobalt chromium tungsten alloy. The subject materials conform to the following standards: GUR 1050 UHMWPE conforming to ASTM F648; GUR 1020 UHMWPE conforming to ASTM F648; High-density polyethylene; Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium Extra Low Interstitial Alloy conforming to ASTM F136; Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy conforming to ASTM F75; Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy conforming to ASTM F799; GUR 1020 5 MRad Cross-linked Polyethylene conforming to ASTM F648; Cobalt-20Chromium-15Tungsten-10Nickel Alloy conforming to ASTM F90.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text is a compilation of FDA 510(k) clearance letters and summaries for various knee and limb salvage systems manufactured by MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. These documents primarily address administrative changes related to sterilization suppliers and parameters and assert substantial equivalence to previously cleared devices.

Crucially, the documents explicitly state that "No bench testing, animal testing, or clinical testing was performed to support this submission" ([28]D, [37]D) and "Clinical data were not submitted or relied on for a determination of substantial equivalence" ([29]E, [37]E).

Therefore, based solely on the provided text, it's not possible to describe acceptance criteria or a study that "proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in the traditional sense of a clinical or performance study for a newly designed medical device.

The "study" referenced in these documents is limited to:

  • Validation of sterilization parameters (Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Validation Report) according to ISO standards (ISO 11135:2014, ISO/TS 21387, and ISO 10993-7:2008) to demonstrate the new supplier can achieve a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶.
  • Biocompatibility assessment of the materials, concluding no impact on biological safety due to the change in sterilization supplier/parameters.

The acceptance criteria here are related to the maintenance of sterility and biocompatibility following a change in the manufacturing process (specifically, the sterilization supplier and parameters) for devices that have already established substantial equivalence through previous 510(k) submissions.

Given this context, I will address the questions to the best of my ability based on the information provided, explicitly stating where information is "Not Applicable" or "Not Provided" due to the nature of this particular 510(k) submission (change in sterilization process for already cleared devices, not a new device performance study).


Acceptance Criteria and Study for Sterilization Process Change (based on the provided document)

The core "study" described in the provided text is the validation of a change in Ethylene Oxide (EO) sterilization supplier and parameters for a range of existing knee and limb salvage system implants. The device performance being "proven" here is the continued sterility and biocompatibility of these devices after this change, asserting they remain as safe and effective as their predicate devices.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Acceptance Criteria (for Sterilization Process Change)Reported Device Performance (from "Conclusion")
Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ Maintained"The subject sterilization process underwent sterilization per standards ISO 11135:2014, ISO/TS 21387, and ISO 10993-7:2008 to demonstrate the new sterilization supplier can sterilize the subject devices to a Sterility Assurance level of 10⁻⁶. The sterilization shows that the new subject process is capable of achieving the same sterility performance compared to the predicate process." ([28]D, [37]D)
Biocompatibility Unaffected"Furthermore, biocompatibility assessment of the subject materials determined material properties and device characteristics are unaffected by the subject modification." ([28]D, [37]D) "The impact of the subject change on device materials and subsequent biocompatibility of finished devices was assessed, and it was determined that there was no impact to biological safety of implant materials." ([29]F, [37]F)
Design, Safety, or Effectiveness Unchanged"Validations concluded that the ethylene oxide sterilization change in supplier and parameters does not affect the design, safety, or effectiveness of the subject devices. The subject devices are as safe, as effective, and perform the same as the legally marketed predicate devices cited in this 510(k). The indications for use, intended patient population, design features, and fundamental scientific technology of the subject device are identical to the predicate devices." ([29]G, [38]G)

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

  • Sample Size for Test Set: The document does not specify the exact sample size (number of devices) used for the sterilization validation or biocompatibility assessment. It states that the "subject sterilization process underwent sterilization" and that "biocompatibility assessment... was assessed" ([28]D, [37]D). Regulatory requirements for sterilization validation (e.g., ISO 11135) dictate specific sample sizes for sterility testing (e.g., bioburden, sterility tests). However, these specific numbers are not provided in this summary.
  • Data Provenance: The data comes from internal validation studies conducted by MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. (or their contracted sterilization supplier) to support the change. The country of origin for the data is not explicitly stated, but MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. is based in Arlington, Tennessee, USA ([24] Submitted by, [30] Submitted by). The studies are prospective in the sense that they were conducted specifically to validate the new sterilization process before seeking 510(k) clearance for the change.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

  • Not Applicable in this context. This 510(k) submission is about validating a manufacturing process change (sterilization), not evaluating clinical performance or diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, there is no "ground truth" established by clinical experts for a test set in the sense of image interpretation or medical diagnosis. The "ground truth" for sterilization is defined by established international standards (ISO series) for achieving a specific SAL, and for biocompatibility, by biological safety assessments.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

  • Not Applicable. As no clinical or diagnostic test set requiring expert interpretation or consensus was performed, no adjudication method was used. The assessment relied on adherence to scientific and engineering standards for sterilization and material biocompatibility.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

  • No MRMC study was done. The device type (knee and limb salvage system implants) is a physical implant, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

  • Not Applicable. The devices are physical implants, not algorithms.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

  • The "ground truth" for this submission revolves around compliance with established international standards for sterilization and biocompatibility:
    • Sterilization: The ground truth is the achievement of a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ as defined by ISO 11135:2014 and ISO/TS 21387.
    • Biocompatibility: The ground truth is the absence of adverse biological reactions as demonstrated by assessment against ISO 10993-7:2008 and other relevant biocompatibility standards, ensuring material properties and device characteristics are unaffected.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

  • Not Applicable. This submission is not for a new device development involving a "training set" for an algorithm. The "training" in this context refers to manufacturing process validation.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

  • Not Applicable. As above, no training set for an algorithm exists here. The "ground truth" for the overall device's safety and effectiveness was previously established by the predicate devices which had undergone their own respective regulatory clearances, covering aspects like design, materials, and clinical performance (if applicable). This 510(k) only addresses the impact of a change in sterilization supplier on these already established devices.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: on the left, there is a symbol representing the Department of Health & Human Services - USA, and on the right, there is the text "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue. The word "FDA" is in a larger, bolder font, while "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" is in a slightly smaller font, and "ADMINISTRATION" is in an even smaller font below.

June 28, 2024

MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. Ryan Ross Sr. Regulatory Manager 5677 Airline Road Arlington, Tennessee 38002

Re: K240043

Trade/Device Name: EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System;GUARDIAN™ limb Salvage System;DCW Modular Distal Femoral System;REPIPHYSIS™ Limb Salvage System;EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System; EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee Svstem: EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive CS Insert: EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive PS Tibial Insert; EVOLUTION® MP CS/CR Porous Femur/EVOLUTION® Adaptive CS and PS Inserts: EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System: ADVANCE® Double High Insert; ADVANCE® A-CLASS® Tibial Insert; ADVANCE® Knee System; ADVANCE® Ultra-Congruent Tibial Insert; ADVANCED® Revision Product Line Extension; ADVANCE® Total Knee System-Patella: ADVANCE® Tibial Component: Whiteside Condylar II Total Knee Prosthesis; Whiteside ORTHOLOC™; Whiteside ORTHOLOC® M.A. Total Knee System; AXIOM® Total Knee Syst/ACL Retain Tibial Tray/Insert; AXIOM® Total Knee System, A/P Curved Tibial Insert; Second GENERATION KNEE SYSTEM; Whiteside ORTHOLOC® Modular Post. Stab. Knee System; AXIOM® Total Knee System; Thick Tibial Insert; Insall-Burstein II; ORTHOLOC® ADVANTIM® PS LSI Tibial Insert; ULTRACK Total Knee System. Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3510 Regulation Name: Knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KRO, MBH, JWH, HRY, HSX

Dear Ryan Ross:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is sending this letter to notify you of an administrative change for your device cleared on April 1, 2024. Specifically, FDA is updating this SE Letter because FDA inadvertently indicated that the SE determination also included review and clearance of a predetermined change control plan (PCCP). However, your 510(k) submission did not include a PCCP, so FDA is providing this administrative correction. Please see the attached revised clearance letter.

Please note that the 510(k) submission was not re-reviewed. For questions regarding this letter please contact Lixin Liu, OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices, 301-796-3480, Lixin.Liu(@fda.hhs.gov.

{1}------------------------------------------------

Sincerely,

Image /page/1/Picture/3 description: The image contains the name "Lixin Liu-S" in a large, bold, sans-serif font. The text is black against a white background. The letters are evenly spaced and easily readable.

Lixin Liu, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

{2}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters 'FDA' in a blue square, followed by the words 'U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION' in blue text.

June 28, 2024

MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. Ryan Ross Sr. Regulatory Manager 5677 Airline Road Arlington. Tennessee 38002

Re: K240043

Trade/Device Name: EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System: GUARDIAN™ limb Salvage System: DCW Modular Distal Femoral System;REPIPHYSIS™ Limb Salvage System;EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System; EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System; EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive CS Insert; EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive PS Tibial Insert; EVOLUTION® MP CS/CR Porous Femur/EVOLUTION® Adaptive CS and PS Inserts; EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System; ADVANCE® Double High Insert; ADVANCE® A-CLASS® Tibial Insert; ADVANCE® Knee System; ADVANCE® Ultra-Congruent Tibial Insert; ADVANCED® Revision Product Line Extension; ADVANCE® Total Knee System-Patella; ADVANCE® Tibial Component; Whiteside Condylar II Total Knee Prosthesis: Whiteside ORTHOLOC™: Whiteside ORTHOLOC® M.A. Total Knee System; AXIOM® Total Knee Syst/ACL Retain Tibial Tray/Insert; AXIOM® Total Knee System. A/P Curved Tibial Insert: Second GENERATION KNEE SYSTEM; Whiteside ORTHOLOC® Modular Post. Stab. Knee System; AXIOM® Total Knee System: Thick Tibial Insert: Insall-Burstein II: ORTHOLOC® ADVANTIM® PS LSI Tibial Insert; ULTRACK Total Knee System. Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3510 Regulation Name: Knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KRO, MBH, JWH, HRY, HSX Dated: January 5, 2024 Received: January 5, 2024

Dear Ryan Ross:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is sending this letter to notify you of an administrative change for your device cleared on April 1, 2024.

We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the

{3}------------------------------------------------

provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrb/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).

Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical

{4}------------------------------------------------

devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE(@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Lixin Liu -S

Lixin Liu, PhD Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{5}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System

Indications for Use (Describe)

The EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System is indicated for use in knee arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

  1. Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis; 2) Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;

  2. Correction of functional deformity:

  3. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

The EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System implants are for cemented use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
-------------------------------------------------

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{6}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

GUARDIAN™ Limb Salvage System

Indications for Use (Describe)

GUARDIAN™ Limb Salvage Hip Components:

Indicated for use in total hip arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved hip function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

  1. non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusio acetabuli. and painful hip dysplasia;

  2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis;

  3. correction of functional deformity;

  4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and,

  5. treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

Limb salvage system is also indicated for procedures where radical resection and replacement of the proximal, distal and/ or total femur is required with the following conditions:

  1. patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the hip that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment;

  2. surgical intervention for severe trauma, revision hip arthroplasties, and/or Oncology indications.

  3. metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors)

The GUARDIANTM Limb Salvage Knee Components:

Indicated for cemented use in knee arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved knee function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

  1. noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, or avascular necrosis;
    1. inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;
    1. correction of functional deformity;
    1. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and
  1. treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

Limb salvage system is also indicated for procedures where radical resection and replacement of the proximal tibia is required with the following conditions:

  1. patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the knee that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment:

  2. surgical intervention for severe trauma, revision knee arthroplasties, and/or Oncology indications.

  3. metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors)

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

{7}------------------------------------------------

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{8}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name DCW MODULAR DISTAL FEMORAL SYSTEM

Indications for Use (Describe)

The DCW Modular Distal Femoral System is primarily indicated for procedures in which a variable resection length prosthesis is necessary to accommodate the condition of the femur, e.g. bone loss/removal in disease-related knee arthroplasty or a distally fractured femur. It is also indicated for revious total knee replacement where the femoral prosthesis has loosened, broken, or requires surgical removal for another medical reason. These indications are intended to provide relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{9}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name REPIPHYSIS™ Limb Salvage System

Indications for Use (Describe)

Limb salvage surgery is indicated for cemented procedures where radical resection and replacement of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia is required with the following conditions:

  1. patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the knee that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment;

  2. surgical intervention for severe trauma. revision knee arthroplasties, and/or oncology indications.

  3. metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors)

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{10}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System, EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive CS Insert, EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive PS Tibial Insert, EVOLUTION® MP CS/CR Porous Femur/EVOLUTION® Adaptive CS and PS Inserts, EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System

Indications for Use (Describe)

The EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System is indicated for use in knee arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

  1. noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis;

  2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;

  3. correction of functional deformity:

  4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

The EVOLUTION® Total Knee System nonporous components are for cemented use only. The EVOLUTION® Total Knee System porous components are for use without bone cement.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{11}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

ADVANCE® Double High Insert, ADVANCE® A-CLASS Tibial Insert, ADVANCE® Knee System, ADVANCE® Ultra-Congruent Tibial Insert, ADVANCED® Revision Product Line Extension, ADVANCE® Total Knee System-Patella, ADVANCE® Tibial Component

Indications for Use (Describe)

The ADVANCE® Total Knee System components are indicated for use in total knee arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved knee function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

  1. noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, or avascular necrosis;

  2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;

  3. correction of functional deformity:

  4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and

  5. treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

The ADVANCE® Total Knee System is for single use. The Advance Total Knee System porous components are for use without bone cement. The Advance Total Knee System non-porous components are for use with bone cement.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
-------------------------------------------------

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{12}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

Whiteside Condylar II Total Knee Prosthesis

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Whiteside Condylar II™ Total Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis or traumatic arthritis, with or without moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities. The prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The device is intended for cemented use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{13}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name Whiteside ORTHOLOC

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Whiteside ORTHOLOC™ Posterior Stabilized Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities, where posterior cruciate ligaments are inadequate, absent or unable to be preserved intraoperatively. The prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis where the cruciate ligaments are absent ligaments are intact. The device is intended for cemented use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{14}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

Whiteside ORTHOLOC M.A. Total Knee System

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Whiteside ORTHOLOC® M.A. Total Knee System is indicated for use in conjunction with the metal tibial base of the Whiteside ORTHOLOC® II Total Knee System for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental or tricompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The device is intended for cemented use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{15}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

AXIOM Total Knee Syst/ACL Retain Tibial Tray/Insert

Indications for Use (Describe)

The AXIOM ACL Retaining Tibial Tray and Tibial Insert are used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the tibial plateau of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. AXIOM ACL Retaining Tibial Tray and Tibial Insert are for cemented use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{16}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

AXIOM Total Knee System, A/P Curved Tibial Insert

Indications for Use (Describe)

The A/P Curved Tibial Insert is used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the femoral condyles, tibial plateau and patella articulating surface of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. The A/P Curved Tibial Insert is intended for cemented application only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{17}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

Second Generation Knee System

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Second Generation Knee System is used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the femoral condyles, tibial plateau and patella articulating surface of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. The Second Generation Knee System is intended for cemented application only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{18}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name

Whiteside ORTHOLOC Modular Post. Stab. Knee System

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Whiteside ORTHOLOC® Modular Posterior Stabilized Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities, where the posterior cruciate ligaments are inadequate, absent or unable to be preserved intraoperatively. This prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis. where the cruciate ligaments are absent. This device is intended for cemented use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{19}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name AXIOM Total Knee System

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Modular Femoral Component and Constrained Tibial insert are used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the femoral condyles, tibial plateau and patella articulating surface of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. Additional indications specific to the Modular Femoral Component and Constrained Tibial Insert include use in patients with anterior/posterior, varus/valgus, and rotational joint instability resulting from inadequate or absent cruciate and collateral ligaments, or who's knee can not be stabilized by usual soft tissue management. This device is intended for single use in a cemented application only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{20}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name Thick Tibial Insert

Indications for Use (Describe)

The ORTHOLOC® Tibial Plastic Insert, as part the ORTHOLOC® Total Knee System, is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The system is also indicated for revision of failed prosthesis where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intended for cemented use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{21}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name Insall-Burstein II

Indications for Use (Describe)

Total knee arthroplasty has been proved effective in reducing pain and in restoring functional knee motion. Such surgical procedures have been used in the management of: painful disabling bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, theumatic arthritis; posttraumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy, moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities. The device may also be indicated in the salvage of previously failed surgical attempts. This device is intended for cemented use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{22}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name ORTHOLOC ADVANTIM PS LSI Tibial Insert

Indications for Use (Describe)

The ORTHOLOC® ADVANTIM™ Posterior Stabilized Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities where the posterior cruciate ligaments are inadequate, absent or unable to be preserved intraoperatively. This prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis, where the cruciate ligaments are absent.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{23}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Number (if known) K240043

Device Name ULTRACK Total Knee System

Indications for Use (Describe)

The ULTRACK™ Total Knee System is intended for bicompartmental replacement of the knee joint for reduction of pain or increased function for the following conditions:

  1. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, or avascular necrosis;

  2. Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;

  3. Correction of functional deformity:

  4. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and

  5. Treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

This device is intended for cemented use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

{24}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness

Submitted by:MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.5677 Airline Rd, Arlington TN, 38002USAPhone: 866-872-0211Fax: 855-446-2247
Date:March 29, 2024
Contact Person:Ryan Ross, Sr. Manager, Regulatory Affairs
Proprietary Name:EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee SystemGUARDIAN™ Limb Salvage SystemDCW Modular Distal Femoral SystemREPIPHYSIS™ Limb Salvage System
Common Name:Hinge Knee SystemLimb Salvage System
Classification Name andReference:21 CFR 888.3510 – Knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrainedcemented prosthesisClass II
Primary Product Code andPanel Code:Orthopedics/87/ KRO
Primary Predicate Device:EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System (K230563)
Additional Predicates:GUARDIAN™ Limb Salvage System (K013035)DCW Modular Distal Femoral System (K910596)REPIPHYSIS™ Limb Salvage System (K021489)

{25}------------------------------------------------

DEVICE INFORMATION

The purpose of this bundled submission is to notify of a change in ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization supplier taking place, affecting all MicroPort Orthopedics UHMWPE and combination metal/UHMWPE knee system implants. The subject devices consist of multiple devices across multiple systems. The subject devices are identical to the predicate devices in all aspects, and the only change is to the sterilization supplier and sterilization parameters. The subject devices included in this Traditional 510(k) Premarket Notification have been bundled in accordance with "Bundling Multiple Indications in a Single Submission; Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff" issued on June 22, 2007. Per assessment of the guidance document, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. has determined the devices bundled in this submission are appropriate as the supporting data are similar, one review division/group is involved, and the devices or indications for use are similar. All subject devices included in this submission are similar devices that undergo the same sterilization process, are affected by the same supplier and parameter changes, and the change is supported by similar validations and assessments.

A. Intended Use/Indications for Use Statement

Device Name: EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System Indications:

The EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System is indicated for use in knee arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

    1. Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis;
    1. Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;
    1. Correction of functional deformity;
    1. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

The EVOLUTION® Hinge Knee System implants are for cemented use only.

Device Name: GUARDIAN™ Limb Salvage System

Indications:

GUARDIAN™ Limb Salvage Hip Components:

Indicated for use in total hip arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved hip function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

    1. non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusio acetabuli, and painful hip dysplasia;
    1. inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis;
    1. correction of functional deformity;
    1. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and,
    1. treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

{26}------------------------------------------------

Limb salvage system is also indicated for procedures where radical resection and replacement of the proximal, distal and/or total femur is required with the following conditions:

    1. patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the hip that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment;
    1. surgical intervention for severe trauma, revision hip arthroplasties, and/or Oncology indications.
    1. metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors)

The GUARDIAN™ Limb Salvage Knee Components:

Indicated for cemented use in knee arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved knee function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

    1. noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis;
    1. inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;
    1. correction of functional deformity;
    1. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and
    1. treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

Limb salvage system is also indicated for procedures where radical resection and replacement of the proximal tibia is required with the following conditions:

    1. patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the knee that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment;
    1. surgical intervention for severe trauma, revision knee arthroplasties, and/or Oncology indications.
    1. metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors)

Device Name: DCW Modular Distal Femoral System

The DCW Modular Distal Femoral System is primarily indicated for procedures in Indications: which a variable resection length prosthesis is necessary to accommodate the condition of the femur, e.g. bone loss/removal in disease-related knee arthroplasty or a distally fractured femur. It is also indicated for revision of a previous total knee replacement where the femoral prosthesis has loosened, broken, or requires surgical removal for another medical reason. These indications are intended to provide relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients.

Device Name: REPIPHYSIS™ Limb Salvage System Indications:

Limb salvage surgery is indicated for cemented procedures where radical resection and replacement of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia is required with the following conditions:

{27}------------------------------------------------

    1. patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the knee that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment;
    1. surgical intervention for severe trauma. revision knee arthroplasties, and/or oncology indications.
    1. metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors)

B. Device Description

The subject devices include the following affected components:

  • . Tibial spacers manufactured from UHMWPE
  • Tibial hinge base with stop pins manufactured from UHMWPE, titanium alloy, and cobalt chromium alloys
  • Hinge bushings manufactured from UHMWPE
  • Tibial inserts manufactured from UHMWPE with locking screws and posts manufactured . from titanium alloy, cobalt chromium tungsten allov, and cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy
  • . Femoral axial pins manufactured from combination UHMWPE and cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy and combination high density polyethylene (HDPE) and cobalt chromium alloy
  • . Yoke extension stops manufactured from UHMWPE

The subject materials conform to the following standards:

  • . GUR 1050 UHMWPE conforming to ASTM F648
  • GUR 1020 UHMWPE conforming to ASTM F648
  • High-density polyethylene
  • Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium Extra Low Interstitial Alloy conforming to ASTM F136
  • Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy conforming to ASTM F75
  • Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy conforming to ASTM F799

C. Substantial Equivalence Information

The design features and materials of the subject devices are substantially equivalent to those of the predicate devices. The indications for use and intended patient populations are identical to the predicate devices. The fundamental scientific technology of the subject devices has not changed relative to the predicate devices. The only changes are to ethylene oxide sterilization parameters, and the changes were validated and determined to not have an effect on the safety or effectiveness of the devices.

{28}------------------------------------------------

D. Nonclinical Testing

No bench testing, animal testing, or clinical testing was performed to support this submission. The subject sterilization process underwent sterilization per standards ISO 11135:2014, ISO/TS 21387, and ISO 10993-7:2008 to demonstrate the new sterilization supplier can sterilize the subject devices to a Sterility Assurance level of 10 °. The sterilization shows that the new subject process is capable of achieving the same sterility performance compared to the predicate process. Furthermore, biocompatibility assessment of the subject materials determined material properties and device characteristics are unaffected by the subject modification. The sterilization type and sterility assurance level are not affected by the change and remain identical. The current EO sterilization supplier and the new EO supplier use similar parameters in their EO sterilization cycles, and a comparison of the parameters can be found in the Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Validation Report.

E. Clinical Testing

Clinical data were not submitted or relied on for a determination of substantial equivalence.

F. Biocompatibility

The subject devices are identical in materials and processing to the predicate devices, with the exception of the subject change. The impact of the subject change on device materials and subsequent biocompatibility of finished devices was assessed, and it was determined that there was no impact to biological safety of implant materials.

{29}------------------------------------------------

G. Conclusion

Validations concluded that the ethylene oxide sterilization change in supplier and parameters does not affect the design, safety, or effectiveness of the subject devices. The subject devices are as safe, as effective, and perform the same as the legally marketed predicate devices cited in this 510(k). The indications for use, intended patient population, design features, and fundamental scientific technology of the subject device are identical to the predicate devices. The safety and effectiveness of the subject devices are adequately supported by the substantial equivalence information, materials information, and analysis data provided within this premarket notification submission. Therefore, the subject devices are considered substantially equivalent to the cited predicate devices.

{30}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness

Submitted by:MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.
5677 Airline Rd, Arlington TN, 38002
USA
Phone: 866-872-0211
Fax: 855-446-2247
Date:March 29, 2024
Contact Person:Ryan Ross, Sr. Manager, Regulatory Affairs
Proprietary Name:EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System
EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System
EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive CS Insert
EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive PS Tibial Insert
EVOLUTION® MP CS/CR Porous Femur/EVOLUTION® Adaptive CS and PSInserts
EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System
ADVANCE® Double High Insert
ADVANCE® A-CLASS® Tibial Insert
ADVANCE® Knee System
ADVANCE® Ultra-Congruent Tibial Insert
ADVANCED® Revision Product Line Extension
ADVANCE® Total Knee System-Patella
ADVANCE® Tibial Component
Whiteside Condylar II Total Knee Prosthesis
Whiteside ORTHOLOC™
Whiteside ORTHOLOC® M.A. Total Knee System
AXIOM® Total Knee Syst/ACL Retain Tibial Tray/Inser
AXIOM® Total Knee System, A/P Curved Tibial Insert
Second GENERATION KNEE SYSTEM
Whiteside ORTHOLOC® Modular Post. Stab. Knee System
AXIOM® Total Knee System
Thick Tibial Insert
Insall-Burstein II
ORTHOLOC® ADVANTIM® PS LSI Tibial Insert
ULTRACK Total Knee System

{31}------------------------------------------------

Common Name:Tibial Insert, Total Knee System, Patella, Cementless FemoralComponent, Cementless Knee Systems, Cemented Revision KneeSystems, Metal Femoral Component; All Polyethylene Tibial andPatellar Components, Metal-backed Tibial Component, Total KneeRevision Replacement Implant
Classification Name andReference:21 CFR 888.3565 – Knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymerporous-coated uncemented prosthesisClass II
Primary Product Code andPanel Code:Orthopedics/87/ MBH
Secondary Product Code:Orthopedics/87/ JWH, HRY, HSX
Primary Predicate Device:EVOLUTION® MP CS/CR Porous Femur/EVOLUTION® Adaptive CS andPS Inserts (K140735)
Additional Predicates:EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System (K093552)EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System (K102380)EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive CS Insert (K113325)EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive PS Tibial Insert (K131679)EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System (K171389)ADVANCE® Double High Insert (K033890)ADVANCE® A-CLASS® Tibial Insert (K081479)ADVANCE® Knee System (K972626)ADVANCE® Ultra-Congruent Tibial Insert (K972770)ADVANCED® Revision Product Line Extension (K990030)ADVANCE® Total Knee System-Patella (K122218)ADVANCE® Tibial Component (K960617)Whiteside Condylar II Total Knee Prosthesis (K861715)Whiteside ORTHOLOC™ (K864070)Whiteside ORTHOLOC® M.A. Total Knee System (K893252)AXIOM® Total Knee Syst/ACL Retain Tibial Tray/Inser (K926334)AXIOM® Total Knee System, A/P Curved Tibial Insert (K912894)Second GENERATION KNEE SYSTEM (K894334)Whiteside ORTHOLOC® Modular Post. Stab. Knee System (K901992)AXIOM® Total Knee System (K932677)Thick Tibial Insert (K933289)

{32}------------------------------------------------

Insall-Burstein II (K935080) ORTHOLOC® ADVANTIM® PS LSI Tibial Insert (K940235) ULTRACK Total Knee System (K953439)

DEVICE INFORMATION

The purpose of this bundled submission is to notify of a change in ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization supplier taking place, affecting all MicroPort Orthopedics UHMWPE and combination metal/UHMWPE knee system implants. The subject devices consist of multiple systems. The subject devices are identical to the predicate devices in all aspects, and the only change is to the sterilization supplier and sterilization parameters. The subject devices included in this Traditional 510(k) Premarket Notification have been bundled in accordance with "Bundling Multiple Indications in a Single Submission; Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff" issued on June 22, 2007. Per assessment of the guidance document, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. has determined the devices bundled in this submission are appropriate as the supporting data are similar, one review division/group is involved, and the devices or indications for use are similar. All subject devices included in this submission are similar devices that undergo the same sterilization process, are affected by the same supplier and parameter changes, and the change is supported by similar validations and assessments.

A. Intended Use/Indications for Use Statement

Device Name: EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System, EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive CS Insert, EVOLUTION® MP Adaptive PS Tibial Insert, EVOLUTION® MP CS/CR Porous Femur/EVOLUTION® Adaptive CS and PS Inserts, EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System

Indications: The EVOLUTION® MP Total Knee System is indicated for use in knee arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

  1. noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis;

  2. inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;

  3. correction of functional deformity;

  4. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

The EVOLUTION® Total Knee System nonporous components are for cemented use only. The EVOLUTION® Total Knee System porous components are for use without bone cement.

Device Name: ADVANCE® Double High Insert, ADVANCE® A-CLASS Tibial Insert, ADVANCE® Knee System, ADVANCE® Ultra-Congruent Tibial Insert, ADVANCED® Revision Product Line Extension, ADVANCE® Total Knee System-Patella, ADVANCE® Tibial Component

{33}------------------------------------------------

Indications: The ADVANCE® Total Knee System components are indicated for use in total knee arthroplasty for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved knee function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

  1. noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis;
    1. inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;
    1. correction of functional deformity;
    1. revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and
    1. treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

The ADVANCE® Total Knee System is for single use. The Advance Total Knee System porous components are for use without bone cement. The Advance Total Knee System non-porous components are for use with bone cement.

Device Name: Whiteside Condylar II Total Knee Prosthesis

Indications: The Whiteside Condylar II™ Total Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis or traumatic arthritis, with or without moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities. The prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The device is intended for cemented use only.

Device Name: Whiteside ORTHOLOC

Indications: The Whiteside ORTHOLOC™ Posterior Stabilized Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis or rheumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities, where posterior cruciate ligaments are inadequate, absent or unable to be preserved intraoperatively. The prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis where the cruciate ligaments are absent but the collateral ligaments are intact. The device is intended for cemented use only.

Device Name: Whiteside ORTHOLOC M.A. Total Knee System

Indications: The Whiteside ORTHOLOC® M.A. Total Knee System is indicated for use in conjunction with the metal tibial base of the Whiteside ORTHOLOC® II Total Knee System for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental or tricompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities where the

{34}------------------------------------------------

posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The device is intended for cemented use only.

Device Name: AXIOM Total Knee Syst/ACL Retain Tibial Tray/Insert

Indications: The AXIOM ACL Retaining Tibial Tray and Tibial Insert are used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the tibial plateau of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. AXIOM ACL Retaining Tibial Tray and Tibial Insert are for cemented use only.

Device Name: AXIOM Total Knee System, A/P Curved Tibial Insert

Indications: The A/P Curved Tibial Insert is used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the femoral condyles, tibial plateau and patella articulating surface of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. The A/P Curved Tibial Insert is intended for cemented application only.

Device Name: Second Generation Knee System

Indications: The Second Generation Knee System is used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the femoral condyles, tibial plateau and patella articulating surface of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. The Second Generation Knee System is intended for cemented application only.

Device Name: Whiteside ORTHOLOC Modular Post. Stab. Knee System

Indications: The Whiteside ORTHOLOC® Modular Posterior Stabilized Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities, where the posterior cruciate ligaments are inadequate, absent or unable to be preserved intraoperatively. This prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis, where the cruciate ligaments are absent. This device is intended for cemented use only.

Device Name: AXIOM Total Knee System

Indications: The Modular Femoral Component and Constrained Tibial insert are used in total knee arthroplasty for replacement of the femoral condyles, tibial plateau and patella articulating

{35}------------------------------------------------

surface of the knee joint due to degenerative bone disease, trauma, moderate deformity, or complications from failed prostheses. Additional indications specific to the Modular Femoral Component and Constrained Tibial Insert include use in patients with anterior/posterior, varus/valgus, and rotational joint instability resulting from inadequate or absent cruciate and collateral ligaments, or who's knee can not be stabilized by usual soft tissue management. This device is intended for single use in a cemented application only.

Device Name: Thick Tibial Insert

Indications: The ORTHOLOC® Tibial Plastic Insert, as part the ORTHOLOC® Total Knee System, is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. The system is also indicated for revision of failed prosthesis where the posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments are intact. This device is intended for cemented use only.

Device Name: Insall-Burstein II

Indications: Total knee arthroplasty has been proved effective in reducing or relieving pain and in restoring functional knee motion. Such surgical procedures have been used in the management of: painful disabling bicompartmental joint disease secondary to· osteoarthritis, rheumatoid, or traumatic arthritis; posttraumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy, moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities. The device may also be indicated in the salvage of previously failed surgical attempts. This device is intended for cemented use only.

Device Name: ORTHOLOC ADVANTIM PS LSI Tibial Insert

Indications: The ORTHOLOC® ADVANTIM™ Posterior Stabilized Knee System is indicated for relief of pain and restoration of knee function in skeletally mature patients with bicompartmental or tricompartmental joint disease secondary to osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, with or without valgus, varus, or flexion deformities where the posterior cruciate ligaments are inadequate, absent or unable to be preserved intraoperatively. This prosthesis is also indicated for revision of a failed prosthesis, where the cruciate ligaments are absent.

Device Name: ULTRACK™ Total Knee System

{36}------------------------------------------------

Indications: The ULTRACK™ Total Knee System is intended for bicompartmental or tricompartmental replacement of the knee joint for reduction of pain or increased function for the following conditions:

  1. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis;
    1. Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis;
    1. Correction of functional deformity;
    1. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and
    1. Treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

This device is intended for cemented use only.

B. Device Description

The subject devices include the following affected components:

  • . Tibial inserts manufactured from UHMWPE with locking screws and posts manufactured from titanium alloy, cobalt chromium tungsten alloy, and cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy
  • Patellae manufactured from UHMWPE and cobalt chromium tungsten alloy

The subject materials conform to the following standards:

  • GUR 1050 UHMWPE conforming to ASTM F648
  • GUR 1020 UHMWPE conforming to ASTM F648
  • GUR 1020 5 MRad Cross-linked Polyethylene conforming to ASTM F648
  • . Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium Extra Low Interstitial Alloy conforming to ASTM F136
  • . Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy conforming to ASTM F799
  • . Cobalt-20Chromium-15Tungsten-10Nickel Alloy conforming to ASTM F90

{37}------------------------------------------------

C. Substantial Equivalence Information

The design features and materials of the subject devices are substantially equivalent to those of the predicate devices. The indications for use and intended patient populations are identical to the predicate devices. The fundamental scientific technology of the subject devices has not changed relative to the predicate devices. The only changes are to ethylene oxide sterilization parameters, and the changes were validated and determined to not have an effect on the safety or effectiveness of the devices.

D. Nonclinical Testing

No bench testing, animal testing, or clinical testing was performed to support this submission. The subject sterilization process underwent sterilization per standards ISO 11135:2014, ISO/TS 21387, and ISO 10993-7:2008 to demonstrate the new sterilization supplier can sterilize the subject devices to a Sterility Assurance level of 10 °. The sterilization shows that the new subject process is capable of achieving the same sterility performance compared to the predicate process. Furthermore, biocompatibility assessment of the subject materials determined material properties and device characteristics are unaffected by the subject modification. The sterilization type and sterility assurance level are not affected by the change and remain identical. The current EO sterilization supplier and the new EO supplier use similar parameters in their EO sterilization cycles, and a comparison of the parameters can be found in the Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Validation Report.

E. Clinical Testing

Clinical data were not submitted or relied on for a determination of substantial equivalence.

F. Biocompatibility

The subject devices are identical in materials and processing to the predicate devices, with the exception of the subject change. The impact of the subject change on device materials and subsequent biocompatibility of finished devices was assessed, and it was determined that there was no impact to biological safety of implant materials.

G. Conclusion

Validations concluded that the ethylene oxide sterilization change in supplier and parameters does not affect the design, safety, or effectiveness of the subject devices. The subject devices are as safe, as effective, and perform the same as the legally marketed predicate devices cited in this 510(k). The indications for use, intended patient population, design features, and fundamental scientific technology of the subject device are identical to the predicate devices. The safety and effectiveness of the subject devices are adequately supported by the substantial equivalence information, materials information, and analysis data provided within this premarket notification submission. Therefore, the subject devices are considered substantially equivalent to the cited predicate devices.

§ 888.3510 Knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis.

(a)
Identification. A knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace part of a knee joint. The device limits translation or rotation in one or more planes and has components that are linked together or affined. This generic type of device includes prostheses composed of a ball-and-socket joint located between a stemmed femoral and a stemmed tibial component and a runner and track joint between each pair of femoral and tibial condyles. The ball-and-socket joint is composed of a ball at the head of a column rising from the stemmed tibial component. The ball, the column, the tibial plateau, and the stem for fixation of the tibial component are made of an alloy, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum. The ball of the tibial component is held within the socket of the femoral component by the femoral component's flat outer surface. The flat outer surface of the tibial component abuts both a reciprocal flat surface within the cavity of the femoral component and flanges on the femoral component designed to prevent distal displacement. The stem of the femoral component is made of an alloy, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, but the socket of the component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. The femoral component has metallic runners which align with the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tracks that press-fit into the metallic tibial component. The generic class also includes devices whose upper and lower components are linked with a solid bolt passing through a journal bearing of greater radius, permitting some rotation in the transverse plane, a minimal arc of abduction/adduction. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).(b)
Classification. Class II.