(113 days)
The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is a standalone anterior cervical interbody fusion device indicated for skeletally mature patients with cervical disc disease at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage implants are to be used with either autogenous bone graff and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and implanted via an open, anterior approach. The Cages of the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage must be used with the two internal fixation screws provided. The Cages with ≥ 20° lordosis must be used with an additional supplemental fixation system that has been cleared by the FDA for use in the cervical spine, in addition to the two integrated fixation screws provided.
This cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.
The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is product for cervical spinal column stability. The implants of the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage consist of the Cages manufactured through additive manufacturing (ASTM F3001) and the machined Variable screws and Locking plates (ASTM F136). The Locking plate consists of a Blocking plate and a Locking screw and is an additional device for the anti-backout of the Variable screw. This optional implant can help users who feel uncomfortable with the primary self-locking mechanism or when rescue screws are utilized. The Cages and Variable screws are provided in a variety of sizes to accommodate each patient's individual clinical case. The Cages are designed to be used with either autogenous bone graft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. The Cages of the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage are provided as a sterile pack. The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is implanted by using the instruments manufactured from stainless steel material that conform to ASTM F899.
The provided text describes the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage, an intervertebral body fusion device. However, it does not contain information about acceptance criteria and device performance in the context of a clinical study or a study involving human readers and AI. The document primarily focuses on regulatory approval (510(k) clearance) based on substantial equivalence to predicate devices, supported by bench testing.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:
- A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
- Sample size used for the test set and data provenance
- Number of experts used to establish ground truth and their qualifications
- Adjudication method
- Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study results or effect size
- Standalone (algorithm-only) performance
- Type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
- Sample size for the training set
- How ground truth for the training set was established
The provided text only details the mechanical (bench) testing performed for the device. Here's what can be extracted regarding the bench testing:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document states: "The mechanical performance of UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage falls within the acceptance criteria which have been established from the predicate devices." and "The testing meets all acceptance criteria and verifies that performance of the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and reference devices."
However, the specific numerical acceptance criteria or the reported device performance metrics (e.g., specific load values, displacement, cycles to failure) are not provided in the text. It only lists the types of tests performed.
| Test Type | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Static compression test (ASTM F2077) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Static torsion test (ASTM F2077) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Static compression shear test (ASTM F2077) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Dynamic compression test (ASTM F2077) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Dynamic torsion test (ASTM F2077) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Dynamic compression shear test (ASTM F2077) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Subsidence test (ASTM F2267) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Axial pullout test (ASTM F543) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Torsional properties test (ASTM F543) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Driving Torque test (ASTM F543) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Locking band strength test (ASTM F04-25-02-02, ASTM F543) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Locking plate strength test (ASTM F04-25-02-02, ASTM F543) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
| Torsional strength test for Locking screw (ASTM F543) | "Falls within acceptance criteria established from predicate devices" (specific criteria not provided) | Not provided |
The remaining points (2-9) are not applicable as the document describes a bench testing study for a physical medical device (intervertebral cage) and not a study involving AI, human readers, or a test/training set of data for diagnostic purposes.
{0}------------------------------------------------
April 19, 2024
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left and features a stylized image of a human figure. The FDA logo is on the right and features the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
Innosys Co., Ltd. Chae-Hyeon Kim Regulatory Affairs Specialist 20, Sandan-ro 76beon-gil(Rd) Uijeongbu-si. Gyeonggi-do 11781 South Korea
Re: K234119
Trade/Device Name: UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OVE Dated: March 28, 2024 Received: March 28, 2024
Dear Chae-Hyeon Kim:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Katherine D. Kavlock -S
for
Brent Showalter, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
Device Name
UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage
Indications for Use (Describe)
The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is a standalone anterior cervical interbody fusion device indicated for skeletally mature patients with cervical disc disease at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage implants are to be used with either autogenous bone graff and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and implanted via an open, anterior approach. The Cages of the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage must be used with the two internal fixation screws provided. The Cages with ≥ 20° lordosis must be used with an additional supplemental fixation system that has been cleared by the FDA for use in the cervical spine, in addition to the two integrated fixation screws provided.
This cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
| Manufacturer: | Innosys Co., Ltd.20, Sandan-ro 76beon-gil(Rd), Uijeongbu-si, Gyeonggi-do,11781, Korea |
|---|---|
| Sponsor: | Innosys Co., Ltd.20, Sandan-ro 76beon-gil(Rd), Uijeongbu-si, Gyeonggi-do,11781, Korea |
| Sponsor Contact: | Chae-Hyeon Kim, Regulatory Affairs Specialist+82 31 860 6836ch.kim@inno-sys.net |
| Date Prepared: | March 28, 2024 |
| Device Trade Name: | UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage |
| Classification Name: | Intervertebral Fusion Device with Bone Graft, Cervical, per 21 CFR 888.3080 |
| Common Name: | Intervertebral Body Fusion Device, IBF Device |
| Product Code: | OVE |
| Predicate Devices: | UniSpace™ SA Cervical Cage (K213791) |
| Reference Device: | Aspiron™ S ACP System (K220147)Velofix™ SA Cervical Cage (K172424) |
Description of Device:
The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is product for cervical spinal column stability. The implants of the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage consist of the Cages manufactured through additive manufacturing (ASTM F3001) and the machined Variable screws and Locking plates (ASTM F136). The Locking plate consists of a Blocking plate and a Locking screw and is an additional device for the anti-backout of the Variable screw. This optional implant can help users who feel uncomfortable with the primary self-locking mechanism or when rescue screws are utilized. The Cages and Variable screws are provided in a variety of sizes to accommodate each
Image /page/3/Picture/6 description: The image shows the logo for Innosys. The word "innosys" is written in a bold, sans-serif font. The "inno" part of the word is in blue, while the "sys" part is in orange. The logo is simple and modern.
{4}------------------------------------------------
patient's individual clinical case. The Cages are designed to be used with either autogenous bone graft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. The Cages of the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage are provided as a sterile pack. The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is implanted by using the instruments manufactured from stainless steel material that conform to ASTM F899.
Indications For Use:
The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is a standalone anterior cervical interbody fusion device indicated for skeletally mature patients with cervical disc disease at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage implants are to be used with either autogenous bone graft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and implanted via an open, anterior approach. The Cages of the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage must be used with the two internal fixation screws provided. The Cages with ≥ 20° lordosis must be used with an additional supplemental fixation system that has been cleared by the FDA for use in the cervical spine, in addition to the two integrated fixation screws provided. This cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.
Substantial Equivalence:
UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is substantially equivalent to UniSpace™ SA Cervical Cage (K213791) in design, material, mechanical performance, function and intended use.
The mechanical performance of UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Caqe falls within the acceptance criteria which have been established from the predicate devices.
1. Comparison Technological Characteristics
The predicate and proposed devices have similar intended use and basic fundamental scientific technology and share the following similarities;
- The same indications for use
- The similar design features
- The same materials
- The equivalent mechanical performance
Image /page/4/Picture/14 description: The image shows the logo for Innosys. The word "innosys" is written in a sans-serif font. The "inno" portion of the word is in blue, while the "sys" portion is in orange. There is a small blue circle above the "i" in "inno."
{5}------------------------------------------------
2. Performance Testing
The UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage was tested in a non-clinical setting (bench testing) to assess that no new safety and effectiveness issues were raised with this device. The testing meets all acceptance criteria and verifies that performance of the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and reference devices.
The following tests were performed:
-
- UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage
- (1) Static compression test according to ASTM F2077
- (2) Static torsion test according to ASTM F2077
- (3) Static compression shear to ASTM F2077
- (4) Dynamic compression test to ASTM F2077
- (5) Dynamic torsion test to ASTM F2077
- (6) Dynamic compression shear to ASTM F2077
- (7) Subsidence test to ASTM F2267
- (8) Axial pullout test to ASTM F543
- (9) Torsional properties test to ASTM F543
- (10) Driving Torque test to ASTM F543
- (11) Locking band strength test to ASTM F04-25-02-02, ASTM F543
- (12) Locking plate strength test to ASTM F04-25-02-02, ASTM F543
- (13) Torsional strength test for Locking screw to ASTM F543
3. Conclusion
The data and information provided in this submission support the conclusion that the UniSpace® Stand-Alone C Cage is substantially equivalent to its predicate devices with respect to indications for use and technological characteristics.
Image /page/5/Picture/20 description: The image shows the logo for "innosys". The word "innosys" is written in a sans-serif font, with the "inno" part in blue and the "sys" part in orange. The "o" in "inno" is slightly larger and positioned above the rest of the word.
§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.
(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.