(171 days)
The FCT iStream system is indicated to acquire axial volumes of the whole body including the head. Images can be acquired in axial, helical, or dynamic modes. The FCT iStream system can also be used for interventional needle guidance. Volume datasets acquired by an FCT iStream system can be post-processed in the FCT iStream system to provide additional information. Post-processing capabilities of the FCT iStream software include multi-planar reconstruction (MPR), and volume rendering. Volume datasets acquired by an FCT iStream system can be transferred to external devices via a DICOM standard interface.
The Low Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Option for the FCT iStream system is indicated for using low dose CT for lung cancer screening. The screening must be conducted with the established program criteria and protocols that have been approved and published by a governmental body, a professional medical society, and/or FUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation.
The FCT iStream is a multi-slice computed tomography system that uses x-ray data to produce cross-sectional images of the body at various angles. The FCT iStream X-ray source is designed to enable the continuous emission of fan-beam Xrays, and the solid state detector unit is positioned opposite the X-ray source to measure the intensity distribution of the X-rays. The total number of detector channels is 888 channels x 64 rows, and all of the rows are used as 64-slice portions. The collected data is then reconstructed into cross-sectional images by a high-speed reconstruction sub-system. The images are displayed on a Computer Workstation, stored, printed, and archived as required. The workstation is based on current PC technology using the Windows™ operating system. The FCT iStream system consists of a Gantry, Operator's Workstation, Patient Table, High-Frequency X-ray Generator, and accessories.
This appears to be a 510(k) premarket notification summary for a Computed Tomography (CT) system (FCT iStream Phase 1) seeking substantial equivalence to a predicate device (SCENARIA View 4.2). The document primarily focuses on demonstrating the new device's equivalence to an existing one, rather than presenting a detailed study proving novel performance in terms of AI assistance or diagnostic improvement.
Therefore, many of the specific details requested in your prompt (e.g., number of experts for ground truth, MRMC study, effect size of AI assistance, stand-alone performance, training set details) are not typically found or required in a 510(k) submission for a CT scanner that is not inherently an AI/CADe device. The focus here is on the physical and performance characteristics of the CT scanner itself being comparable to a legally marketed predicate.
However, I can extract the relevant information regarding acceptance criteria and performance as presented in this document, inferring the study approach from the context of a 510(k) for a CT system.
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for FCT iStream Phase 1
Since this is a 510(k) for a CT system based on substantial equivalence, the "acceptance criteria" are implicitly and explicitly tied to demonstrating that the FCT iStream Phase 1 performs comparably to its predicate device (SCENARIA View 4.2) and adheres to relevant international standards. The "study" proving this largely involves bench testing against specified parameters and compliance with standards.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document states that the FCT iStream Phase 1 has "equivalent basic performance as the predicate device" and that "the system performance is similar to the predicate device." Instead of specific numerical acceptance criteria for each item, the document lists tested parameters and confirms compliance or equivalence.
| Parameter/Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Implied by 510(k) Substantial Equivalence and Standards) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| General Performance | Performance comparable to the predicate device (SCENARIA View 4.2), meeting intended use for whole-body CT imaging, including low-dose lung cancer screening. | "The system performance is similar to the predicate device." "Evaluations were conducted for IntelliODM, iTilt and for features that were removed from the subject device to the predicate device... The evaluation results confirm the performance characteristics of FCT iStream are comparable to the predicate device and support our conclusion that the subject system is substantially equivalent." |
| Dose Profile | Meets conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g) and IEC61223-3-5 requirements. | "We confirmed that the items (Dose Profile... CT dose index) which we tested met the conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g)." |
| Noise | Meets conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g) and IEC61223-3-5 requirements. | "We confirmed that the items (...Noise...) which we tested met the conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g)." |
| Mean CT Number and Uniformity | Meets conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g) and IEC61223-3-5 requirements. | "We confirmed that the items (...Mean CT number and Uniformity...) which we tested met the conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g)." |
| Spatial Resolution | Meets conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g) and IEC61223-3-5 requirements. | "We confirmed that the items (...Spatial Resolution...) which we tested met the conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g)." |
| Tomographic Section Thickness and Sensitivity Profile | Meets conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g) and IEC61223-3-5 requirements. | "We confirmed that the items (...Tomographic Section Thickness and Sensitivity Profile...) which we tested met the conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g)." |
| Tomographic Plane Location | Meets conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g) and IEC61223-3-5 requirements. | "We confirmed that the items (...Tomographic Plane Location...) which we tested met the conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g)." |
| CT Dose Index | Meets conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g) and IEC61223-3-5 requirements. | "We confirmed that the items (...CT dose index) which we tested met the conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g)." |
| Gantry Tilt Mechanism | Equivalence in function to predicate device (achieved through iTilt software function). | "This gantry does not have a tilt mechanism compared to the predicate device. If it is necessary to take a tilted image, it will use the iTilt function to create an equivalent MPR image. So it will not affect the effectiveness of the system." |
| IntelliODM Feature | Effective reduction of X-ray exposure to the patient's head / sensitive organs, comparable to the predicate. | "IntelliODM is a feature that uses IntelliEC technology to reduce X-ray exposure from the patient's head, reducing direct radiation dose to sensitive organs." (Implicitly, it performs as intended for safety and comparable to predicate's dose control) |
| Safety and Electrical Standards | Compliance with AAMI ANSI ES60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-3, IEC 60601-2-44, IEC 62304, NEMA XR 25. | "This device complies with all applicable requirements for... CT dose index.""In addition, the FCT iStream Phase 1 is in conformance with the applicable parts of the following standards..." (all listed standards are confirmed). |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: The document does not specify a "sample size" in terms of patient cases for clinical evaluation, because the performance testing was primarily bench testing (phantom studies) rather than a clinical study with patient data.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable as the "study" was bench testing. If patient data was used, its origin (country, retrospective/prospective) would be relevant.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
- Not applicable. For a CT system's core performance evaluation in a 510(k), ground truth is established through physical measurements using phantoms and established metrology standards (e.g., IEC61223-3-5), not by medical experts interpreting images.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Not applicable, as there was no expert interpretation or adjudication of patient images mentioned in the context of this 510(k) performance testing.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done as described. This submission is for a general CT system, not an AI/CADe device. The document does not report any AI-assisted human reader performance improvements.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- Not applicable for a standalone diagnostic algorithm. This device is a CT scanner, which generates images for human interpretation. While it contains software (e.g., iTilt, IntelliODM), the performance discussed is of the imaging system itself, not a diagnostic algorithm meant to perform diagnosis or detection independently.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- The ground truth for the performance testing was established through physical phantom measurements and engineering specifications as outlined in the referenced IEC and NEMA standards (e.g., IEC61223-3-5, NEMA XR 25). For example, spatial resolution might be measured using a line pair phantom, noise using a water-equivalent phantom, and CT numbers using specific material inserts.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not applicable. This document describes the validation of a CT scanner's performance for 510(k) clearance, not the development or training of a machine learning or AI algorithm in the typical sense that would require a "training set" of clinical data. While the device contains software, the "training set" concept is not relevant to this type of regulatory submission for a CT system.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not applicable. As a training set for an AI/ML algorithm is not described, the method for establishing its ground truth is also not.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
April 26, 2024
FUJIFILM Healthcare Americas Corporation % Chaitrali Kulkarni Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist 81 Hartwell Avenue Suite 300 LEXINGTON, MA 02421
Re: K233583
Trade/Device Name: FCT iSTREAM Phase 1 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750 Regulation Name: Computed Tomography X-Ray System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JAK Dated: April 1, 2024 Received: April 1, 2024
Dear Chaitrali Kulkarni:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Lu Jiang
Lu Jiang, Ph.D. Assistant Director Diagnostic X-Ray Systems Team DHT8B: Division of Radiological Imaging Devices and Electronic Products OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K233583
Device Name FCT iStream Phase 1
Indications for Use (Describe)
The FCT iStream system is indicated to acquire axial volumes of the whole body including the head. Images can be acquired in axial, helical, or dynamic modes. The FCT iStream system can also be used for interventional needle guidance. Volume datasets acquired by an FCT iStream system can be post-processed in the FCT iStream system to provide additional information. Post-processing capabilities of the FCT iStream software include multi-planar reconstruction (MPR), and volume rendering. Volume datasets acquired by an FCT iStream system can be transferred to external devices via a DICOM standard interface.
The Low Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Option for the FCT iStream system is indicated for using low dose CT for lung cancer screening. The screening must be conducted with the established program criteria and protocols that have been approved and published by a governmental body, a professional medical society, and/or FUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
Submitter Information
| Submitter: | FUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation2-1, Shintoyofuta, Kashiwa-Shi,Chiba, JP 277-0804 |
|---|---|
| Contact: | Chaitrali Kulkarni, Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Telephone number: | (704)-517-4886 |
| E-mail: | chaitrali.kulkarni@fujifilm.com |
| Date: | January 22, 2024 |
Subject Device Name
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | FCT iStream Phase 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 892.1750 | |
| Regulation Name: | Computed tomography x-ray system | |
| Product Code | JAK, System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed | |
| Class | II | |
| Panel | Radiology |
Predicate Device Name
| Predicate Device(s): | SCENARIA View 4.2 (K231574) |
|---|---|
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 892.1750 |
| Regulation Name: | Computed tomography x-ray system |
| Product Code | JAK, System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed |
| Class | II |
| Panel | Radiology |
Indications for Use
The FCT iStream system is indicated to acquire axial volumes of the whole body including the head. Images can be acquired in axial, helical, or dynamic modes. The FCT iStream system can also be used for interventional needle guidance. Volume datasets acquired by an FCT iStream system can be post-processed in the FCT iStream system to provide additional information. Post-processing capabilities of the FCT iStream software include multi-planar reconstruction (MPR), and volume rendering, Volume datasets acquired by an FCT iStream system can be transferred to external devices via a DICOM standard interface.
The Low Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Option for the FCT iStream system is indicated for using low dose CT for lung cancer screening must be conducted with the established program criteria and protocols that have been approved and published by a governmental body, a professional medical society, and/or FUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Device Description
Function
The FCT iStream is a multi-slice computed tomography system that uses x-ray data to produce cross-sectional images of the body at various angles.
Scientific Concepts
The FCT iStream X-ray source is designed to enable the continuous emission of fan-beam Xrays, and the solid state detector unit is positioned opposite the X-ray source to measure the intensity distribution of the X-rays. The total number of detector channels is 888 channels x 64 rows, and all of the rows are used as 64-slice portions. Note that the magnification factor of the X-ray system is 1.77 and that the width of the opening of each channel in the center of the measuring area is 0.6 mm. These factors, along with the focal spot size, affect spatial resolution.
The collected data is then reconstructed into cross-sectional images by a high-speed reconstruction sub-system. The images are displayed on a Computer Workstation, stored, printed, and archived as required. The workstation is based on current PC technology using the Windows™ operating system.
Physical and Performance Characteristics
The FCT iStream system consists of a Gantry, Operator's Workstation, Patient Table, High-Frequency X-ray Generator, and accessories. The system performance is similar to the predicate device.
Performance Comparison
Evaluations were conducted for IntelliODM, iTilt and for features that were removed from the subject device to the predicate device (see table below).
Removed Features
| 1 | Gantry tilt mechanism |
|---|---|
| 2 | Shuttle Scan and Helical Shuttle Scan |
| 3 | Adaptive Filter function (a part of Image analysis function) |
| 4 | Segmentation function (a part of Image analysis function) |
| 5 | Retouch function (a part of Image analysis function) |
| 6 | Image Analysis on external PC |
| 7 | Motion corrected reconstruction (Cardio Still Shot) |
| 8 | Assist in patient positioning using camera (AutoPositioning) |
The evaluation results confirm the performance characteristics of FCT iStream are comparable to the predicate device and support our conclusion that the subject system is substantially equivalent.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the Fujifilm logo. The logo is in black text, with the letters "FUJIFILM" in a bold, sans-serif font. There is a red square above the "I" in Fujifilm. The logo is simple and modern.
Value from Innovation Device Technological Characteristics
A summary of the differences is listed in the following table.
| Systems | FCT iStream Phase 1Subject Device | SCENARIA View 4.2 (K231574)Predicate Device | ITEM | OVERALL RATIONALE ANALYSIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical characteristics | Image: FCT iStream Phase 1 | Image: SCENARIA View 4.2 | Gantry | Different specifications do not constitute a new intended use. There are no significant changesin technological characteristics. The gantry and detector design were based on the sametechnology as the predicate device. |
| Gantry | The specifications of the device are different, the minimum scan time of this device is not asshort as the predicate device. This change does not affect overall technological characteristicscompared to the predicate device.This gantry does not have a tilt mechanism compared to the predicate device. If it is necessaryto take a tilted image, it will use the iTilt function to create an equivalent MPR image. So it willnot affect the effectiveness of the system. Also, this does not affect the safety of this devicecompared to the predicate device.The specifications of the device are different, the size and the weight of the gantry of thisdevice are different from the predicate device. However, as the device weighs less and has asmaller footprint than the predicate device, we judge that these changes do not impact theintended use.The monitor in the center of the gantry is for display only. Since the information required for theintended use of the device is displayed. | Detector | Different specifications do not constitute a new intended use. There are no significant changesin technological characteristics. The gantry and detector design were based on the sametechnology as the predicate device. | |
| Detector | There are no differences between the two systems. | X-ray Tube | These subsystems have the same level of general effectiveness as the predicate device basedon the performance test results. For safety, these items are controlled and tested according tosame regulations and/or standards as the predicate device. | |
| X-ray Tube | The X-ray tube of this device is different from the predicate device only in heat capacity. The X-raytube focal spot and general performance characteristics are the same as the predicate device. | X-ray Generator | This item conforms to IEC 60601-2-44:2009+A1:2012+A2:2016 requirements for CT systemsand has the same level of general effectiveness as the predicate device based on theperformance test results. For safety, this item is controlled and tested according to sameregulations and/or standards as the predicate device. | |
| X-ray Generator | The specifications of the device are different, to match the performance specifications of thisdevice and conforms to IEC 60601-2-44:2009+A1:2012+A2:2016 requirements for CT systems.The kVp and mA output of the device is comparable to the predicate device. | Patient Table | Different specifications do not constitute a new intended use. There are no significant changesin technological characteristics. The table travel and weight capacity characteristics aregenerally equivalent to the predicate device. For safety, this item is controlled and testedaccording to same regulations and/or standards as the predicate device. | |
| Patient Table | The specifications of the device are different, the size and the weight of the table of this device aredifferent from the predicate device. However, as the device weighs less and has a smallerfootprint than the predicate device, we judge that these changes do not impact the intended use. | Operator's console | Operator's console has a slight difference in capacity of the predicate device, but the maximumnumber of storage images remains the same. For safety, this item is controlled and testedaccording to same regulations and/or standards as the predicate device. | |
| Operator's console | Operator's console has a slight difference in SSD capacity of the predicate device, but themaximum number of storage images remains the same. | Scanning, Reconstruction | Different specifications do not constitute a new intended use. There are no significant changesin technological characteristics. The design criteria for these elements were set to allowcomparable performance to the predicate device. The performance of these sub-systems doesnot substantially affect the effectivity and safety as compared to the predicate device. | |
| Scanning, Reconstruction | The iTilt function uses MPR technology to create a tilt image immediately after scanning. Thisfunction uses the same technology as the existing MPR function, and does not affect overalltechnological characteristics compared to the predicate device. | Performance | There are no substantial differences in this category based on the performance test results. | |
| Performance | There is a difference in the Low-contrast mm at % ≤ 4 rads. | Dose Controls | Different specifications do not constitute a new intended use. There are no significant changesin technological characteristics. For safety, these items are controlled and tested according tosame regulations and/or standards as the predicate device. | |
| Dose Controls | While this device is not equipped with a small bow-tie filter, the normal bow-tie filter providesgenerally equivalent performance to the predicate device and does not substantially impact theeffectivity and safety of this device.Intelli IPV is no change in the algorithm, but the heat capacity is reduced from 7.5MHU to 6MHU,so the effect will be different. However, this does not impact the effectivity and safety of this deviceas compared to the predicate device. | Features | Different specifications do not constitute a new intended use. There are no significant changesin technological characteristics and the feature set of the device is generally equivalent to thepredicate device. | |
| Features | IntelliODM is a feature that uses IntelliEC technology to reduce X-ray exposure from the patient'shead, reducing direct radiation dose to sensitive organs. |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Value from Innovation
Therefore, based on a thorough analysis and comparison of subject device and the predicate device, the technological characteristics do not impact safety and effectiveness.
Substantial Equivalence
A summary decision was based on a thorough analysis and comparison of the functions, scientific concepts, physical and performance characteristics, performance comparison and technoloqical characteristics.
Therefore, based on a thorough analysis and comparison of the functions, scientific concepts, physical and performance characteristics, performance comparison and technological characteristics, the proposed FCT iStream Phase1 is considered substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate device (SCENARIA View 4.2 (K231574)) in terms of design features, fundamental scientific technology, indications for use, and safety and effectiveness.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the Fujifilm logo. The logo is in black, except for a small red square with a white diagonal line in the middle. The text "FUJIFILM" is written in a bold, sans-serif font.
Value from Innovation
Summary of Non-Clinical Testing
This device complies with all applicable requirements for Dose Profile, Noise, Mean CT number and Uniformity, Spatial Resolution, Tomographic Section Thickness and Sensitivity Profile, Tomographic Plane Location, and CT dose index.
In addition. the FCT iStream Phase 1 is in conformance with the applicable parts of the following standards:
-
AAMI ANSI ES60601-1:2005/(R) 2012 and A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 and . A2:2010/(R)2012
Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance (IEC 60601-1:2005, MOD) -
IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.0 .
Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility - Requirements and tests -
IEC 60601-1-3 Edition 2.1 . Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-3: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray equipment
-
. IEC 60601-2-44 Edition 3.2
Medical electrical equipment Part 2-44: particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of x-ray equipment for computed tomography.
-
. IEC 62304 Edition 1.1
Medical device software - Software life cycle processes -
. NEMA XR 25 Computed Tomography Dose Check
Summary of Performance Testing
| Testing Type | Rationale Analysis |
|---|---|
| Performance Testing - Bench | We generated bench data based on IEC61223-3-5. We confirmed that the items (DoseProfile, Spatial Resolution, Noise, Mean CT number and Uniformity, Tomographic SectionThickness and Sensitivity Profile, Tomographic Plane Location, CT dose index) which wetested met the conditions of 21 CFR 1020.33(c) or (g). This shows that FCT iStream Phase 1has equivalent basic performance as the predicate device, SCENARIA View 4.2. |
| Performance Testing - Clinical | N/A |
Conclusions
FUJIFILM believes that, based on the information included in the submission, FCT iStream Phase 1 subject device is substantially equivalent with respect to hardware, base elements of the software, safety, effectiveness, and functionality to the SCENARIA View 4.2 (K231574).
§ 892.1750 Computed tomography x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. A computed tomography x-ray system is a diagnostic x-ray system intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axial plane taken at different angles. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II.