(37 days)
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2- ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Marijuana in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Marijuana (THC) | 50 ng/mL |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel offers any combinations from 1 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for OTC use.
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1.5-dimenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug | Calibrator | Cut-off (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | D-Amphetamine | 1,000 or 500 |
| Barbiturates (BAR) | Secobarbital | 300 |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | Buprenorphine | 10 |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | Oxazepam | 300 |
| Cocaine (COC) | Benzoylecgonine | 300 or 150 |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine | 300 |
| Ecstasy (MDMA) | D,L- Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine | 500 |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | D-Methamphetamine | 1,000 or 500 |
| Morphine (MOP/OPI) | Morphine | 2,000 or 300 |
| Methadone (MTD) | Methadone | 300 |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | Oxycodone | 100 |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | Phencyclidine | 25 |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | Propoxyphene | 300 |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | Nortriptyline | 1,000 |
| Marijuana (THC) | 11-nor-Δ9-THC-9 COOH | 50 |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx offers any combinations from 1 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for prescription use.
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
The BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel and BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx are rapid, single-use in vitro diagnostic devices. Each test kit contains a test device in one pouch. One pouch contains a test BioSieve™ Panel and two desiccants, and a package insert. The BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel is intended for over-the-counter use and the BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx is intended for prescription use.
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel
This document describes the acceptance criteria and the studies performed to demonstrate that the BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel meets these criteria.
1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The core acceptance criterion for the BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel, as derived from the provided precision studies, is the accurate qualitative detection of drugs at various concentrations relative to the defined cutoff level. Specifically, the device is expected to:
- Consistently report Negative (no drug detected) for samples with drug concentrations at or below -25% of the cutoff level (e.g., -100% cutoff, -75% cutoff, -50% cutoff, -25% cutoff).
- Consistently report Positive (drug detected) for samples with drug concentrations at or above +25% of the cutoff level (e.g., +25% cutoff, +50% cutoff, +75% cutoff, +100% cutoff).
- Demonstrate a balanced distribution of Positive and Negative results around the cutoff level (e.g., approximately 50% positive and 50% negative).
The reported device performance, based on the precision studies for each drug, generally aligns with these criteria. For concentrations at or below -25% of the cutoff, almost all results were negative (e.g., 50-/0+ indicating 50 negative and 0 positive). For concentrations at or above +25% of the cutoff, almost all results were positive (e.g., 0-/50+ indicating 0 negative and 50 positive). At the cutoff concentration, the results showed a mix of positive and negative, reflecting the expected performance of a qualitative assay near its detection threshold (e.g., 23-/27+, 26-/24+, etc.).
Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (Example for BUP 10, PCP 25, THC 50, OXY 100)
| Concentration by LC/MS (relative to cutoff) | Acceptance Criteria for Qualitative Result | Reported Performance (Example: BUP 10) | Reported Performance (Example: PCP 25) | Reported Performance (Example: THC 50) | Reported Performance (Example: OXY 100) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -100% cutoff | Negative | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| -75% cutoff | Negative | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| -50% cutoff | Negative | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| -25% cutoff | Negative | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Cutoff | Mixed (approx. 50% Pos / 50% Neg) | 26-/24+ (Avg. across lots) | 24-/26+ (Avg. across lots) | 26-/24+ (Avg. across lots) | 25-/25+ (Avg. across lots) |
| +25% cutoff | Positive | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ |
| +50% cutoff | Positive | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ |
| +75% cutoff | Positive | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ |
| +100% cutoff | Positive | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ |
Note: The table above provides a representative sample. The full document lists extensive data for each drug, demonstrating similar performance.
2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The primary analytical performance test (Precision Study) used a substantial sample size. For each drug, tests were performed over 25 days, with two runs per day, using three different lots of test panels. This means for each concentration level tested per drug (e.g., -100% cutoff, -50% cutoff, cutoff, +50% cutoff, +100% cutoff), there were 25 days * 2 runs * 3 lots = 150 individual tests.
The method comparison studies utilized 80 unaltered urine samples for each drug, divided into 40 negative and 40 positive. These samples were run by three different operators.
The lay-user study included a total of 280 participants.
- Configuration 1: 64 males and 76 females (140 participants)
- Configuration 2: 67 males and 73 females (140 participants)
For each drug and each concentration level in the lay-user study, there were 20 test results. Given there are 7 concentration levels per drug, this amounts to 140 results per drug per configuration.
Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin for the data. However, the studies were performed by VivaChek Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. located in Hangzhou, China, suggesting the data was collected there. The studies appear to be retrospective as they involve prepared samples or collected unaltered urine samples that were then tested.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
The ground truth for the analytical performance and method comparison studies was established using LC/MS (Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry) or LC/MS/MS. LC/MS is a highly accurate and widely accepted gold-standard analytical method for confirming drug concentrations in urine.
The document does not specify the "number of experts" or their "qualifications" in the context of establishing LC/MS ground truth, as LC/MS is an instrumental method that provides objective quantitative results. The operation and interpretation of LC/MS data typically rely on trained laboratory personnel with expertise in analytical chemistry, but their specific "qualifications" (e.g., years of experience) are not detailed in this submission.
For the lay-user study, the ground truth was also established by spiking known concentrations of drugs into drug-free urine, confirming these concentrations via LC/MS or LC/MS/MS.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
For the analytical performance (precision) studies, the raw results for each concentration level are presented (e.g., 26-/24+). This implies no specific "adjudication method" beyond the direct comparison of the device's qualitative result (positive/negative) against the quantitative LC/MS ground truth. The acceptance criteria for the cutoff concentration already imply a mixed outcome is expected.
For the method comparison study, discordant results are explicitly listed with the LC/MS result compared against the device's result by each operator. This indicates a direct comparison to the LC/MS ground truth rather than an adjudication process between device results.
For the lay-user study, the "agreement (%)" is calculated based on how often the lay user's interpretation of the device result matched the expected result based on the spiked concentration (and confirmed by LC/MS). Again, this is a direct comparison to established ground truth, not an adjudication of human interpretations.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done in the traditional sense of comparing human readers with and without AI assistance, as this device (BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel) is a lateral flow immunochromatographic assay, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool for image or data interpretation.
The studies involve:
- Analytical performance: Device-to-LC/MS comparison.
- Method comparison: Three operators reading the device and comparing to LC/MS. This is a multi-reader study, but comparing the device's output to a gold standard, not assessing the improvement of human readers with AI assistance.
- Lay-user study: Multiple lay users interpreting the device results based on provided instructions. This evaluates the ease of use and interpretability for the intended over-the-counter audience, not the effectiveness of AI assistance.
Therefore, an "effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance" is not applicable to this device or the studies presented.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
Given that the BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel is a physical, lateral flow immunochromatographic assay, it inherently requires a human-in-the-loop to visually interpret the test lines. It is not an "algorithm only" device. Therefore, a standalone (algorithm only) performance study was not done and is not applicable. The precision, comparison, and lay-user studies all involve human observation and interpretation of the visual reaction.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The primary type of ground truth used across all analytical studies (precision, specificity, interference, method comparison, and lay-user studies) is analytical confirmation by LC/MS (Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry) or LC/MS/MS. This a quantitative chemical method considered a gold standard for drug detection and concentration measurement.
For the precision studies, various concentrations of each drug were "spiking target drug in drug-free urine samples" and "confirmed by LC/MS."
For the method comparison studies, "unaltered urine samples were blind labeled and compared to LC/MS results."
For the lay-user study, samples were "spiked with drug(s) into drug free-pooled urine specimens. The concentrations of the samples were confirmed by LC/MS or LC/MS."
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not explicitly mention a "training set" in the context of machine learning or algorithm development. This device is a biochemical immunoassay, not an AI/ML-based diagnostic. Therefore, there is no separate "training set" as understood in a computational context.
The studies described are for verification and validation of the device's analytical performance.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As there is no "training set" for an AI/ML algorithm for this device, this question is not applicable. The chemical and biological principles of the immunoassay define its detection capabilities, rather than a learned model from a training set.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains two logos. On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. On the right is the FDA logo, which includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
VivaChek Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. % Joe Shia LSI International 504 E Diamond Ave., Suite I Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877
Re: K233062
Trade/Device Name: BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel: BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx Regulation Number: 21 CFR 21 CFR 862.3100 Regulation Name: Amphetamine test system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NFT, NFY, NGL, PTH, NFV, PTG, NGG, LCM, QBF, QAW, NFW Dated: September 21, 2023 Received: September 26, 2023
Dear Joe Shia:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safetyreporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely, Joseph A. Digitally signed by Joseph
Kotarek -S
Date: 2023.11.02 14:50:57 Kotarek -S Joseph Kotarek, Ph.D. Branch Chief Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K233062
Device Name
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel
Indications for Use (Describe)
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2- ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Marijuana in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Marijuana (THC) | 50 ng/mL |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel offers any combinations from 1 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for OTC use.
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
_ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K233062
Device Name
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx
Indications for Use (Describe)
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1.5-dimenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug | Calibrator | Cut-off (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | D-Amphetamine | 1,000 or 500 |
| Barbiturates (BAR) | Secobarbital | 300 |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | Buprenorphine | 10 |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | Oxazepam | 300 |
| Cocaine (COC) | Benzoylecgonine | 300 or 150 |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine | 300 |
| Ecstasy (MDMA) | D,L- Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine | 500 |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | D-Methamphetamine | 1,000 or 500 |
| Morphine (MOP/OPI) | Morphine | 2,000 or 300 |
| Methadone (MTD) | Methadone | 300 |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | Oxycodone | 100 |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | Phencyclidine | 25 |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | Propoxyphene | 300 |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | Nortriptyline | 1,000 |
| Marijuana (THC) | 11-nor-Δ9-THC-9 COOH | 50 |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx offers any combinations from 1 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for prescription use.
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) SUMMARY
K233062
| 1 | Date | October 25, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Submitter | VivaChek Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.Level 2, Block 2, 146 East Chaofeng Rd.Hangzhou, China |
| 3 | Contact Person | Joe ShiaLSI International Inc.504 East Diamond Ave., Suite HGaithersburg, MD 20877Telephone: 240-505-7880Fax: 301-916-6213Email: shiajl@yahoo.com |
- BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel 4 Device Name BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx
- 5 Classification Class II
| Class II | ||
|---|---|---|
| Product CodeTarget Drug | Regulation Section | Panel |
| NFTAmphetamine (AMP) | 862.3100, Amphetamine Test System | Toxicology |
| NGLBuprenorphine (BUP) | 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology |
| PTHSecobarbital (BAR) | 862.3150, Barbiturate Test System | Toxicology |
| NFVOxazepam (BZO) | 862.3170,Benzodiazepine Test System | Toxicology |
| NFYCocaine (COC) | 862.3250, Cocaine Test System | Toxicology |
| PTG2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine(EDDP) | 862.3620, Methadone Test System | Toxicology |
| NGGMethamphetamine(MET) | 862.3610,Methamphetamine Test System | Toxicology |
| NGGMethylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 862.3610,Methamphetamine Test System | Toxicology |
| NGL | 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Morphine (MOP/OPI) | ||
|---|---|---|
| PTGMethadone (MTD) | 862.3620, Methadone Test System | Toxicology |
| NGLOxycodone (OXY) | 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology |
| LCMPhencyclidine (PCP) | Unclassified | Toxicology |
| QBFPropoxyphene (PPX) | 862.3700 Propoxyphene testsystem. | Toxicology |
| QAWNortriptyline (TCA) | 862.3910 Tricyclic antidepressantdrugs test system | Toxicology |
| NFWCannabinoids (THC 50) | 862.3870, Cannabinoids TestSystem | Toxicology |
6. Predicate Device K202567
Wondfo T-Dip® Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel
7. Intended Use
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2- ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Marijuana in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Marijuana (THC) | 50 ng/mL |
|---|---|
| ----------------- | ---------- |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel offers any combinations from 1 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for OTC use.
The test may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Nortriptyline, Propoxyphene and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternative chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2- ethylidene-1.5-dimethyl-3.3diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug | Calibrator | Cut-off (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | D-Amphetamine | 1,000 or 500 |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | Secobarbital | 300 |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | Buprenorphine | 10 |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | Oxazepam | 300 |
| Cocaine (COC ) | Benzoylecgonine | 300 or 150 |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine | 300 |
| Ecstasy (MDMA) | D,L- Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine | 500 |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | D-Methamphetamine | 1,000 or 500 |
| Morphine (MOP/OPI ) | Morphine | 2,000 or 300 |
| Methadone (MTD) | Methadone | 300 |
| Oxycodone (OXY ) | Oxycodone | 100 |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | Phencyclidine | 25 |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | Propoxyphene | 300 |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | Nortriptyline | 1,000 |
| Marijuana (THC ) | 11-nor-Δ9-THC-9 COOH | 50 |
{9}------------------------------------------------
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx offers any combinations from 1 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for prescription use.
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Nortriptyline, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
Device Description 8.
The BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel and BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx are rapid, single-use in vitro diagnostic devices. Each test kit contains a test device in one pouch. One pouch contains a test BioSieve™ Panel and two desiccants, and a package insert. The BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel is intended for over-the-counter use and the BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx is intended for prescription use.
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate(K202567) |
|---|---|---|
| Indication(s) foruse | For the qualitative determination of Amphetamine,Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine,Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine,Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine,Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine. | Same |
| Methodology | Competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographicassay based on antigen-antibody reaction | Same |
| Type of Test | Qualitative | Same |
| Specimen Type | Human urine | Same |
| Target Drugand Cut OffValues | Target Drug | Cutoff (ng/mL) |
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 or 500 | |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 | |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 | |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 | |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 or 150 | |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 | |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 or 500 | |
Substantial Equivalence Information 9.
{10}------------------------------------------------
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 or 300 | |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 | |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 | |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 | |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 | |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 | |
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) | 50 | |
| Configurations | Test Panel | Panel |
| Intended Use | Prescription Use and over-the-counter use | Prescription Use and over-the-counter use |
10. Test Principle
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel and BioSieve™M Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx are rapid tests for the qualitative detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital. Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in urine samples. They are lateral flow chromatographic immunoassay. When urine sample is added to the Panel device, urine is absorbed into the test strip and migrates upwards by capillary action. If the concentration of target drug presented in the urine sample is below the cutoff level, the target drug will not saturate the binding sites of its specific monoclonal antibody-coated particles. The antibody-coated particles will then be captured by immobilized drug-conjugate and a visible colored band will be formed on the test line region. If the concentration of target is beyond the cutoff level, the target drug will saturate the binding sites of its specific monoclonal antibody-particles, thus the antibody-coated particles will not be captured by immobilized drug-conjugate hence no colored band will be formed on the test line region.
A band should be formed on the control line region regardless of the presence of target drug or metabolite in the sample to indicate that the tests have been performed properly.
11. Performance Characteristics
-
- Analytical Performance
- Precision a.
Precision studies were carried out for samples with concentrations of -100% cut off, - 50% cut off, -25% cut off, cutoff, +25% cut off, +75% cut off, +75% cut off and +100% cut off. Samples with concentration of -100% cutoff were drug-free urines samples. Other samples were prepared by spiking target drug in drug-free urine samples. Each drug concentration was confirmed by LC/MS. For each concentration, tests were performed two runs per day for 25 days using three lots of test Panels. The results obtained are summarized in the following tables:
{11}------------------------------------------------
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel BUP 10
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.0 | 17.1 | 13.6 | 11.8 | 10.2 | 6.9 | 5.4 | 2.7 | 0 | |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel PCP 25
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot Number | 52.1 | 43.1 | 37.3 | 29.4 | 25.2 | 17.7 | 12.2 | 6.5 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel THC 50
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL) | 96.5 | 84.3 | 75.7 | 60.1 | 52.5 | 35.9 | 24.1 | 12.1 | 0 |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel OXY 100
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200.3 | 177.1 | 158.9 | 131.7 | 108.5 | 78.0 | 51.6 | 27.6 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{12}------------------------------------------------
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel BAR 300
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 588.4 | 525.8 | 457.6 | 383.8 | 301.6 | 228.3 | 157.1 | 80.2 | 0 | |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel BZO 300
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 596.1 | 536.5 | 470.4 | 370.3 | 290.4 | 219.8 | 157.3 | 78.5 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel EDDP 300
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS(ng/mL) | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| 646.2 | 545.3 | 455.1 | 371.0 | 290.7 | 229.5 | 148.8 | 77.0 | 0 | |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 28-/22+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel MTD 300
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 620.5 | 547.0 | 469.9 | 380.9 | 328.6 | 240.2 | 143.9 | 71.4 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{13}------------------------------------------------
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel MOP 300
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS(ng/mL) | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| Lot Number | 622.4 | 530.2 | 468.8 | 381.8 | 322.8 | 220.8 | 159.0 | 75.4 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel PPX 300
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL) | 622.3 | 562.7 | 451.3 | 383.3 | 297.7 | 218.3 | 152.5 | 75.8 | 0 |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 28-/22+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel COC 150
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 298.2 | 246.1 | 237.0 | 193.6 | 157.7 | 106.5 | 76.2 | 36.0 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel MDMA 500
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| 1048.5 | 861.5 | 740.8 | 614.9 | 522.8 | 342.0 | 250.6 | 128.4 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{14}------------------------------------------------
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel TCA 1000
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2175.2 | 1841.2 | 1597.5 | 1261.6 | 1081.5 | 708.2 | 493.1 | 251.5 | 0 | ||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel AMP 500
| Concentration | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| by LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 1011.8 | 846.4 | 772.7 | 646.8 | 544.3 | 357.6 | 225.0 | 120.9 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel MET 500
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1072.7 | 873.9 | 731.7 | 633.1 | 477.8 | 386.1 | 249.2 | 122.5 | 0 | |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel OPI 2000
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4208.2 | 3672.9 | 3119.0 | 2590.5 | 2050.0 | 1460.4 | 1007.5 | 493.0 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{15}------------------------------------------------
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel COC 300
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 610.6 | 558.5 | 461.6 | 373.4 | 329.9 | 235.6 | 156.7 | 74.5 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel AMP 1000
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 1933.3 | 1805.2 | 1562.7 | 1262.0 | 1051.1 | 812.0 | 540.9 | 271.9 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel MET 1000
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 1954.6 | 1824.2 | 1593.1 | 1304.9 | 1003.4 | 736.7 | 464.8 | 251.1 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
The following cutoff values are verified:
| Target Drug | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
{16}------------------------------------------------
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
|---|---|
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) | 50 ng/mL |
b. Linearity
Not applicable
c. Stability
The devices are stable at 2-30°C for 24 months based on real time stability studies at 2°C and 30°C.
d. Interference
Potential interfering substances were added to drug-free urine sample and samples with target drugs of -25% cutoff and +25% cutoff level.
Compounds that show no interference at a concentration of 100µg/mL are summarized in the following table.
| Acetaminophen | Effexor | Nikethamide |
|---|---|---|
| Acetophenetidin | Enalapril Maleate | Nimodipine |
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | Epinephrine Hydrochloride | Nitroglycerin |
| Acyclovir | Erythromycin | Norethindrone |
| Afrin | Esomeprazole Magnesium | O-Hydroxyhippuric Acid |
| Albumin (100mg/dL) | ß-Estradiol | Olanzapine |
| Aminophylline | Ethanol (1%) | Omeprazole |
| Aminopyrine | Fenofibrate | Ondansetran |
| Amiodarone Hydrochloride | Fenoprofen | Oxalic Acid |
| Amlodipine Mesylate | Fentanyl Citrate | Oxolinic Acid |
| Amoxicillin | Fluoxetine Hydrochloride | Oxymetazoline |
| Ampicillin | Fluvoxamine | Paliperidone |
| Apomorphine | Furosemide | Pantoprazole |
| Aripiprazole | Gabapentin | Papaverine |
| Aspartame | Gentisic Acid | Paroxetine Hydrochloride |
| Atomoxetine | Glibenclamide | Penfluridol |
| Atorvastatin Calcium | Gliclazide | Penicillin-G |
| Atropine | Glipizide | PenicillinV Potassium |
| Benzilic Acid | Glucose | Phenelzine |
| Benzoic Acid | Haloperidol | Pioglitazone Hydrochloride |
| Bilirubin | Hemoglobin | Piracetam |
| Bupropion | Hydrochlorothiazide | Pravastatin Sodium |
| Captopril | Hydrocortisone | Prednisone |
| Carbamazepine | 3-Hydroxytyramine | Promethazine |
| Cefradine | Ibuprofen | Propylthiouracil |
| Cephalexin | Isosorbide Dinitrate | Quetiapine Fumarate |
| Chloral Hydrate | Isoxsuprine | Quinine |
| Chloramphenicol | Ketamine | Ranitidine |
| Chlorothiazide | Ketoconazole | Rifampicin |
| chlorpheniramine | Ketoprofen | Risperidone |
| Cholesterol | Kratom powder | Salicylic Acid |
| Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride | Labetalol | Serotonin |
| Citalopram | Lamotrigine | Sertraline Hydrochloride |
| Clarithromycin | Levofloxacin Hydrochloride | Sildenafil Citrate |
| Clonidine | Levonorgestrel | Simvastatin |
| Clopidogrel Hydrogen Sulphate | Levothyroxine Sodium | Sodium Valproate |
| Clozapine | Lidocaine Hydrochloride | Spironolactone |
| Conjugated Estrogens | Lisinopril | Sulfamethazine |
| Cortisone | Lithium Carbonate | Sulindac |
| (-) Cotinine | Liverite | Tetracycline |
| Creatinine | Loperamide | Tetrahydrocortisone 3- (β-D glucuronide) |
| D-Pseudoephedrine | Loratadine | Tetrahydrocortsone 3 -acetate |
| D,L-Octopamine | Magnesium | Tetrahydrozoline |
| D,L-Propranolol | Meperidine | Thiamine |
| D,L-Tyrosine | Meprobamate | Thioridazine |
| Deoxy- corticosterone | Metoprolol Tartrate | Topiramate |
| Dextromethorphan | Mifepristone | Tramadol Hydrochloride |
| Diclofenac | Minocycline | Trazodone Hydrochloride |
| Dicyclomine | Mirtazapine | Triamterene |
| Diflunisal | Montelukast Sodium | Trifluoperazine |
| Digoxin | Mosapride Citrate | Trimethoprim |
| Diphenhydramine | N-Acetylprocain-amide | Uric Acid |
| Dirithromycin | Nalidixic Acid | Valproate |
| Domperidone | Naproxen | Verapamil |
| Doxylamine | Niacinamide | Vitamin B2 |
| Duloxetine | Nifedipine | Vitamin C |
| Ecgonine Methyl Ester |
{17}------------------------------------------------
{18}------------------------------------------------
- Specificity e.
To test the specificity, drug metabolites and other components that are likely to cross-react in urine samples were spiked into drug-free urine. These urine samples were tested using three lots of each device.
Percent cross-reactivity, provided in the below table, was calculated as the cutoff concentration divided by the concentration of analyte tested that yielded a positive result, multiplied by 100; compounds that did not yield a positive result at the highest concentration tested have relative cross reactivity results represented by a dash in the table below:
| BUP 10 (Buprenorphine,Cutoff=10 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Buprenorphine -3-D-Glucuronide | 15 | 66.67% |
| Norbuprenorphine | 20 | 50% |
| Norbuprenorphine-3-D-Glucuronide | 200 | 5% |
| Morphine | >100000 | - |
| Oxymorphone | >100000 | - |
| Hydromorphone | >100000 | - |
| PCP (Phencyclidine)(Phencyclidine,Cutoff=25 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| 4-Hydroxyphencyclidine | 12500 | 0.2% |
| THC 50(11-nor-Δ9-THC-9-COOH,Cutoff=50 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| (-)-11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-THC | 50 | 100% |
| 11-nor-Δ8-THC-9-COOH | 50 | 100% |
| 11-nor-Δ9-THC-carboxy glucuronide | 100 | 50% |
| Cannabidiol | 100,000 | -- |
| Cannabinol | 100,000 | -- |
| Δ8- Tetrahydrocannabinol | 15,000 | 0.3% |
| Δ9- Tetrahydrocannabinol | 15,000 | 0.3% |
| 11-hydroxy-Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol | 5,000 | 1% |
| OXY 100(Oxycodone, Cutoff=100 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Dihydrocodeine | 20,000 | 0.5% |
| Hydrocodone | 80 | 125% |
{19}------------------------------------------------
| Oxymorphone | 1,000 | 10% |
|---|---|---|
| Codeine | 100,000 | -- |
| Hydromorphone | 36,000 | 0.28% |
| Morphine | 100,000 | -- |
| Acetylmorphine | 100,000 | -- |
| Buprenorphine | 100,000 | -- |
| Ethylmorphine | 100,000 | -- |
| Thebaine | 100,000 | -- |
| COC 150(Benzoylecgonine, Cutoff=150 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Cocaine | 375 | 40% |
| Cocaethylene | 6,250 | 2.4% |
| Ecgonine | 16,000 | 0.9% |
| Ecgonine methyl ester | 100,000 | -- |
| Norcocaine | 100,000 | -- |
| BAR 300(Secobarbital, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Amobarbital | 300 | 100% |
| Alphenol | 600 | 50% |
| Aprobarbital | 200 | 150% |
| Butabarbital | 100 | 300% |
| Butethal | 200 | 150% |
| Butalbital | 2,000 | 15% |
| Cyclopentobarbital | 400 | 75% |
| Pentobarbital | 200 | 150% |
| Phenobarbital | 200 | 150% |
| BZO 300(Oxazepam, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Alprazolam | 190 | 157.9% |
| a-Hydroxyalprazolam | 300 | 100% |
| Bromazepam | 500 | 60% |
| Chlordiazepoxide | 1,500 | 20% |
| Clobazam | 110 | 272.7% |
| Clonazepam | 100,000 | -- |
| Clorazepate dipotassium | 300 | 100% |
| Delorazepam | 100,000 | -- |
{20}------------------------------------------------
| Desalkylflurazepam | 200 | 150% |
|---|---|---|
| Diazepam | 190 | 157.9% |
| Estazolam | 5,000 | 6% |
| Flunitrazepam | 400 | 75% |
| Midazolam | 2,200 | 13.6% |
| Nitrazepam | 200 | 150% |
| Norchlordiazepoxide | 800 | 37.5% |
| Nordiazepam | 150 | 200% |
| Temazepam | 100 | 300% |
| Triazolam | 6,000 | 5% |
| Demoxepam | 2,000 | 15% |
| Flurazepam | 100,000 | -- |
| D,L-Lorazepam | 75,000 | 0.4% |
| EDDP 300(2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Cutoff = 300 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Methadone | >100000 | - |
| EMDP | >100000 | - |
| Doxylamine | >100000 | - |
| Disopyramide | >100000 | - |
| LAAM (Levo-alpha-acetylmethadol) HCl | >100000 | - |
| Alpha Methadol | >100000 | - |
| MTD 300(Methadone, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Doxylamine | >100000 | - |
| EDDP | >100000 | - |
| EMDP | >100000 | - |
| LAAM | >100000 | - |
| Alpha Methadol | >100000 | - |
| MOP 300(Morphine, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Normorphine | 300 | 100% |
| Codeine | 300 | 100% |
| s-Monoacetylmorphine | 300 | 100% |
| Ethyl Morphine | 200 | 150% |
| Heroin | 300 | 100% |
| Hydrocodone | 700 | 42.9% |
{21}------------------------------------------------
| Hydromorphone | 200 | 150% |
|---|---|---|
| Morphinie-3-β-d-glucuronide | 1,000 | 30% |
| Oxycodone | 100,000 | -- |
| Oxymorphone | 100,000 | -- |
| Thebaine | 20,000 | 1.5% |
| Levorphanol | 10,000 | 3% |
| 6-Monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) | 300 | 100% |
| Norcodeine | 6,250 | 4.8% |
| Procaine | 100,000 | -- |
| PPX 300(d-Propoxyphene, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| d-Norpropoxyphene | 300 | 100% |
| MDMA 500(3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine HCl,Cutoff=500ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine HCl (MDA) | 4,000 | 12.5% |
| 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE) | 400 | 125% |
| d-methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d-amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| AMP (Amphetamine) (Amphetamine,Cutoff=500ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| l-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| dl- Amphetamine | 1,500 | 33.3% |
| (+/-) 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | 500 | 100% |
| Phentermine | 6,000 | 8.3% |
| Hydroxyamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| (+/-) 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE) | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | >100000 | - |
| β-Phenylethylamine | >100000 | - |
| Tyramine | >100000 | - |
| p-Hydroxynorephedrine | >100000 | - |
{22}------------------------------------------------
| Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | - |
|---|---|---|
| (+)Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | - |
| p-Hydroxyamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d/l-Norephedrine | >100000 | - |
| Benzphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| l-Epinephrine | >100000 | - |
| d/l-Epinephrine | >100000 | - |
| Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| MET 500(D(+)-Methamphetamine, Cutoff=500ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxy-n-ethylamphetamine(MDE) | 12,500 | 4% |
| D/L-Methamphetamine | 500 | 100% |
| p-Hydroxymethamphetamine | 15,000 | 3.3% |
| D-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| L-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| Chloroquine | 50,000 | 1% |
| (+/-)-Ephedrine | 100,000 | -- |
| (-)-Methamphetamine | 65,000 | 0.8% |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | 4,000 | 12.5% |
| β-Phenylethylamine | 25,000 | 2% |
| Trimethobenzamide | 10,000 | 5% |
| d,l-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| Mephentermine | 25,000 | 2% |
| (1R,2S)-(-)-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| 1-phenylephrine | >100000 | - |
| L-Methamphetamine | 65,000 | 0.8% |
| TCA 1000(Nortriptyline, Cutoff=1000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Nordoxepine | 1,000 | 100% |
| Trimipramine | 3,000 | 33.3% |
| Amitriptyline | 450 | 222.2% |
| Promazine | 1,500 | 66.7% |
| Desipramine | 200 | 500% |
{23}------------------------------------------------
| Imipramine | 80 | 1250% |
|---|---|---|
| Clomipramine | 1,200 | 83.3% |
| Doxepin | 2,000 | 50% |
| Maprotiline | 2,000 | 50% |
| Promethazine | >100,000 | -- |
| Cyclobenzaprine | 800 | 125% |
| Norclomipramine | 12,500 | 8% |
| COC 300(Benzoylecgonine, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Cocaine | 780 | 38.5% |
| Cocaethylene | 12,500 | 2.4% |
| Ecgonine | 32,000 | 0.9% |
| Ecgonine methyl ester | >100000 | - |
| Norcocaine | >100000 | - |
| AMP 1000(d-Amphetamine, Cutoff=1000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| l-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| dl- Amphetamine | 3,000 | 33.3% |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | 1,000 | 100%, |
| Phentermine | 6,000 | 16.7% |
| Hydroxyamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine(MDE) | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | >100000 | - |
| β-Phenylethylamine | >100000 | - |
| Tyramine | >100000 | - |
| p-Hydroxynorephedrine | >100000 | - |
| Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | - |
| (±)Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | - |
| p-Hydroxyamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d/l-Norephedrine | >100000 | - |
| Benzphetamine | >100000 | - |
| 1-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| l-Epinephrine | >100000 | - |
| d/l-Epinephrine | >100000 | - |
{24}------------------------------------------------
| Company of Children Company of Children Company Company Comments of Children Comments of Children Comments of Children Comments of Children Comments of Children Comments of CEphedrine | >100000 | |
|---|---|---|
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | -- |
| MET 1000(D(+)-Methamphetamine, Cutoff=1000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxy-n-ethylamphetamine(MDE) | 25,000 | 4% |
| D/L-Methamphetamine | 1,000 | 100% |
| p-Hydroxymethamphetamine | 30,000 | 3.3% |
| D-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| L-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| Chloroquine | 50,000 | 2% |
| (+/-)-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| (-)-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | 8,000 | 12.5% |
| β-Phenylethylamine | 50,000 | 2% |
| Trimethobenzamide | 20,000 | 5% |
| d,l-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| Mephetermine | 50,000 | 2% |
| (1R,2S)-(-)-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| L-phenylephrine | >100000 | - |
| L-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| OPI 2000(Morphine, Cutoff=2000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Normorphine | 50,000 | 4% |
| Codeine | 2,000 | 100% |
| s-Monoacetylmorphine | 2,000 | 100% |
| Ethyl Morphine | 1,500 | 133.3% |
| Heroin | 2,000 | 100% |
| Hydrocodone | 12,500 | 16% |
| Hydromorphone | 3,500 | 57.1% |
| Morphinie-3-β-d-glucuronide | 2,000 | 100% |
| Oxycodone | 25,000 | 8% |
| Oxymorphone | 25,000 | 8% |
| Thebaine | 50,000 | 4% |
| Levorphanol | 75,000 | 2.7% |
| 6-Monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) | 2,000 | 100% |
{25}------------------------------------------------
| Norcodeine | 12,500 | 16% |
|---|---|---|
| Procaine | >100,000 | -- |
f. Effect of Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH
To investigate the effect of urine specific gravity, urine samples with specific gravity from 1.000 to 1.035 were spiked with target drugs at +25% cutoff and -25% cutoff levels. Three Operators tested each sample using test devices from three different lots. The results were all positive for samples at +25% cutoff and all negative for samples at -25% cutoff, indicating that urine specific gravity between 1.000 and 1.035 has no effect on the accuracy and precision of the test device.
To investigate the effect of urine pH, urine samples with pH value from 4 to 9 were spiked with target drugs at +25% cutoff and -25% cutoff levels. Three Operators tested each sample using test devices from three different lots. The results were all positive for samples at +25% cutoff and all negative for samples at -25% cutoff, indicating that urine pH value between 4.0 and 9.0 has no effect on the accuracy and precision of the test device.
-
g. Reading Time Study
Reading time studies were performed for drug free urine samples and urine samples spiked with drug concentrations of -50% cutoff, -25% cutoff, +25% cutoff and +50% cutoff. It demonstrated that test results can be read from 5 to 10 minutes. -
Comparison Studies 2.
The method comparison studies for BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel were performed inhouse with three operators.
Operators ran 80 (40 negative and 40 positive) unaltered urine samples were blind labeled and compared to LC/MS results. The results are presented in the table below:
For BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel:
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 12 | 16 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 12 | 18 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
AMP 500
{26}------------------------------------------------
| Negative | 10 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -- | ---------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | --- | --- |
Discordant Results for AMP 500:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | AMP132 | 385.9 | + |
| Operator A | AMP136 | 499.0 | + |
| Operator C | AMP028 | 477.4 | + |
BUP 10
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for BUP 10:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | BUP010 | 11.3 | - |
| Operator A | BUP029 | 10.2 | - |
| Operator B | BUP029 | 10.2 | - |
| Operator C | BUP029 | 10.2 | - |
| Operator A | BUP070 | 9.9 | + |
| Operator B | BUP052 | 9.5 | + |
| Operator B | BUP070 | 9.9 | + |
| Operator C | BUP058 | 9.8 | + |
| Operator C | BUP070 | 9.9 | + |
BAR 300
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
{27}------------------------------------------------
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 1 | 0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for BAR 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | BAR017 | 300.9 | - |
| Operator A | BAR011 | 303.8 | - |
| Operator A | BAR033 | 312.2 | - |
| Operator B | BAR017 | 300.9 | - |
| Operator C | BAR017 | 300.9 | - |
| Operator C | BAR011 | 303.8 | - |
| Operator A | BAR054 | 285.0 | + |
| Operator C | BAR054 | 285.0 | + |
BZO 300
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 23 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 23 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 23 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for BZO 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | BZO018 | 303.6 | - |
| Operator B | BZO058 | 307.2 | - |
| Operator C | BZO018 | 303.6 | - |
| Operator C | BZO058 | 307.2 | - |
COC 150
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS(less than -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS | HighPositive byLC/MS(greaterthan +50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -------------------- | -- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
{28}------------------------------------------------
| (Between -50% and theCutoff) | (Between thecutoff and+50%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for COC 150:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | COC046 | 144.8 | + |
| Operator B | COC146 | 148.9 | + |
| Operator C | COC046 | 144.8 | + |
| Operator C | COC146 | 148.9 | + |
| Operator B | COC128 | 162.8 | - |
| Operator C | COC128 | 162.8 | - |
EDDP 300
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50% and theCutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for EDDP 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | EDDP069 | 288.4 | + |
| Operator B | EDDP069 | 288.4 | + |
| Operator B | EDDP075 | 290.6 | + |
| Operator C | EDDP075 | 290.6 | + |
| Operator A | EDDP010 | 318.6 | - |
| Operator A | EDDP061 | 318.5 | - |
| Operator C | EDDP010 | 318.6 | - |
{29}------------------------------------------------
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MET 500:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | MET062 | 519.5 | - |
| Operator A | MET102 | 521.1 | - |
| Operator B | MET102 | 521.1 | - |
| Operator C | MET062 | 519.5 | - |
MDMA 500
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MDMA 500:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | MDMA026 | 488.3 | + |
| Operator A | MDMA060 | 492.0 | + |
| Operator B | MDMA060 | 492.0 | + |
| Operator C | MDMA026 | 488.3 | + |
| Operator C | MDMA060 | 492.0 | + |
MOP 300
{30}------------------------------------------------
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | ||||||
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 15 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 22 | |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 22 | |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MOP 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | MOP057 | 293.2 | + |
| Operator B | MOP150 | 282.8 | + |
| Operator B | MOP057 | 293.2 | + |
| Operator C | MOP057 | 293.2 | + |
| Operator C | MOP150 | 282.8 | + |
| Operator A | MOP114 | 315.6 | - |
MTD 300
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MTD 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | MTD022 | 298.2 | + |
| Operator A | MTD049 | 289.2 | + |
| Operator B | MTD022 | 298.2 | + |
| Operator C | MTD049 | 289.2 | + |
| Operator A | MTD003 | 309.1 | - |
{31}------------------------------------------------
| Operator A | MTD045 | 301.7 | - |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | MTD045 | 301.7 | - |
OXY 100
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 15 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 15 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for OXY 100:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | OXY012 | 96.3 | + |
| Operator A | OXY071 | 95.2 | + |
| Operator B | OXY071 | 95.2 | + |
| Operator C | OXY012 | 96.3 | + |
| Operator B | OXY002 | 101.4 | - |
| Operator C | OXY002 | 101.4 | - |
| Operator C | OXY006 | 111.0 | - |
РСР 25
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | ||||
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 18 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 18 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for PCP 25:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | PCP003 | 22.4 | + |
{32}------------------------------------------------
| Operator A | PCP034 | 20.2 | + |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | PCP060 | 22.7 | + |
| Operator C | PCP003 | 22.4 | + |
| Operator C | PCP034 | 20.2 | + |
| Operator A | PCP012 | 29.2 | - |
| Operator A | PCP023 | 25.5 | - |
| Operator B | PCP023 | 25.5 | - |
| Operator C | PCP012 | 29.2 | - |
PPX 300
| BioSieveTMPanel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for PPX 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | PPX024 | 292.5 | + |
| Operator A | PPX029 | 291.4 | + |
| Operator B | PPX029 | 291.4 | + |
| Operator C | PPX024 | 292.5 | + |
| Operator C | PPX029 | 291.4 | + |
| Operator A | PPX043 | 300.7 | - |
| Operator A | PPX053 | 300.8 | - |
| Operator B | PPX043 | 300.7 | - |
| Operator B | PPX053 | 300.8 | - |
| Operator C | PPX043 | 300.7 | - |
TCA 1000
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 22 |
{33}------------------------------------------------
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for TCA 1000:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | TCA043 | 969.0 | + |
| Operator B | TCA005 | 991.3 | + |
| Operator C | TCA005 | 991.3 | + |
| Operator C | TCA043 | 969.0 | + |
| Operator A | TCA010 | 1015.1 | - |
| Operator A | TCA052 | 1015.9 | - |
| Operator B | TCA052 | 1015.9 | - |
| Operator C | TCA010 | 1015.1 | - |
THC 50
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for THC 50:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | THC014 | 47.8 | + |
| Operator A | THC054 | 46.8 | + |
| Operator B | THC054 | 46.8 | + |
| Operator C | THC014 | 47.8 | + |
| Operator A | THC062 | 50.9 | - |
| Operator A | THC069 | 53.5 | - |
| Operator B | THC069 | 53.5 | - |
| Operator B | THC076 | 53.9 | - |
| Operator C | THC036 | 50.5 | - |
{34}------------------------------------------------
| Operator C | THC062 | 50.9 | - |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMP 1000 |
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for AMP 1000:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator C | AMP116 | 998.8 | + |
| Operator A | AMP095 | 1035.1 | - |
| Operator A | AMP102 | 1048.4 | - |
| Operator B | AMP102 | 1048.4 | - |
| Operator C | AMP102 | 1048.4 | - |
COC 300
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 23 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 23 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 15 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 23 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for COC 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | COC028 | 296.4 | + |
| Operator A | COC143 | 283.8 | + |
| Operator B | COC028 | 296.4 | + |
{35}------------------------------------------------
| Operator C | COC028 | 296.4 | + |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator C | COC143 | 283.8 | + |
| Operator A | COC138 | 318.7 | - |
| Operator B | COC033 | 317.7 | - |
| Operator B | COC138 | 318.7 | - |
MET 1000
| BioSieveTMPanel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 19 |
| Negative | 10 | 13 | 17 | 1 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19 |
| Negative | 10 | 13 | 17 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 19 |
| Negative | 10 | 13 | 17 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MET 1000:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | MET123 | 1049.5 | - |
| Operator B | MET123 | 1049.5 | - |
| Operator B | MET138 | 1068.2 | - |
| Operator C | MET138 | 1068.2 | - |
OPI 2000
| BioSieve™Panel | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and +50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for OPI 2000:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | MOP076 | 1943.3 | + |
{36}------------------------------------------------
| Operator A | MOP089 | 2070.0 | - |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | MOP139 | 2105.7 | - |
| Operator C | MOP125 | 2156.7 | - |
Lay-user study:
A lay user study was performed using urine samples prepared at the following concentrations; -100%, +/-75%, +/-50%, +/-25% of the cutoff by spiking drug(s) into drug free-pooled urine specimens. The concentrations of the samples were confirmed by LC/MS or LC/MS. Each sample was aliquoted into individual containers and blind-labeled. A total of 280 participants with diverse educational and professional backgrounds aged 20 years and older were recruited from three sites. Sixty-four males and 76 females tested BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Configuration 1 (including AMP 500, MET 500, MOP 300, COC 150); 67 male and 73 females tested BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Configuration 2 (including AMP 1000, MET 1000, MOP 2000 (OPI), COC 300). Each participant was provided one package insert, one blind labeled test solution, and one test device. The results are summarized below:
Lay-User Study Results for BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Configuration 1 (including AMP 500, MET 500, MOP 300, COC 150):
| Concentration | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assay | Results | -100%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -25%cutoff | +25%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +75%cutoff |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| AMP | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| BUP | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| BAR | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| BZO | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| COC | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| EDDP | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| MDMA | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| MET | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| MOP | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| MTD | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| OXY | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| PCP | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| PPX | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| TCA | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| THC | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 90 | 100 | 100 | |
| Assay | Results | Concentration | ||||||
| -100% cutoff | -75% cutoff | -50% cutoff | -25% cutoff | +25% cutoff | +50% cutoff | +75% cutoff | ||
| AMP | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| BUP | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| BAR | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| BZO | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| COC | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| EDDP | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| MDMA | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| MET | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| OPI | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| MTD | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| OXY | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| PCP | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| PPX | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
| TCA | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| THC | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Agreement (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
{37}------------------------------------------------
{38}------------------------------------------------
Lay-User Study Results for BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Configuration 2 (AMP 1000, MET 1000, MOP 2000 (OPI), COC 300):
{39}------------------------------------------------
Participants were given surveys on the ease of understanding the instruction for use. All participants indicated that the device instruction is easy to understand and follow. A Flesch-Kincaid reading analysis was performed on each package insert and the scores revealed a reading Grade Level of 7.
12. Conclusion
Based on the test principle and performance characteristics of the device including precision, cut-off, interference, specificity, method comparison and lay-user studies of the devices, it's concluded that BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel and BioSieve™ Multi-Drug Urine Test Panel Rx are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
§ 862.3100 Amphetamine test system.
(a)
Identification. An amphetamine test system is a device intended to measure amphetamine, a central nervous system stimulating drug, in plasma and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of amphetamine use or overdose and in monitoring levels of amphetamine to ensure appropriate therapy.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). An amphetamine test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (e.g., programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).