(164 days)
PainFreeze II Medium Stream and Mist Spray are vapocoolants (skin refrigerants) intended for topical op skin. intact mucous membranes (oral cavity, nasal passageways and the lips) and minor open wounds. PainFreeze II's skin refrigerant controls pain associated with injections (venipuncture, IV starts, cosmetic procedures), minor surgical (lancing boils, incisions, drainage of small abscesses, and sutures), and the temporary relief of minor sports injuries (sprains, bruising, cuts and abrasions).
The Subject Device consists of a chemical blend of 60% HFO-1233zd (Trans-1-chloro-3.3.3- trifluoropropene) and 40% HFO-1234ze (trans- 1.3.3.3-tetrafluoroprop-1- ene) that produces a cooling effect upon contact with the skin, intact mucous membranes, and minor open wounds. The product is delivered in the form of an aerosol in either a mist or stream spray. The device's delivery system controls the amount of chemical blend that is dispensed, the mist spray configuration produces very fine droplets that cools at the points of contact. The stream spray configuration produces a pinpoint stream that contacts the skin surface at a specific single location. Upon contact with the skin, the product begins to evaporate immediately as it contacts the skin. The low evaporation rate of the product's chemical blend is what creates the coldness. The Subject Device is non- flammable and has a lower global warming potential than the predicate and provides equivalent performance.
The Subject Device is topically sprayed onto the skin. It creates a cooling effect on the surface of the application site by the immediate evaporation of the product from the skin surface.
With both product configurations, the evaporation creates the cold sensation. As the distance from the target surface is increased, the dispersion of the droplets in both the mist and stream is increased. Increasing the surface area of contact and decreasing the size of the droplets increases the evaporation rate. The increase in evaporation rate correlates to an increase in the cooling effect.
The chemical blend is incorporated in pressurized canisters, which will be offered in two (2) volumes 35 and 115 ml. The canister consists of a high-pressure canister, valve, and actuator.
The provided document is an FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification clearance letter for a medical device called "PainFreeze II," which is a vapocoolant (skin refrigerant). This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than proving enhanced clinical effectiveness or accuracy via a traditional clinical trial or performance study typical for diagnostic/AI devices.
Therefore, the document does not contain the kind of detailed information requested about acceptance criteria, study design for proving device performance, sample sizes for test/training sets, expert qualifications, or multi-reader multi-case studies that would be present for a diagnostic device or an AI/ML algorithm. The "performance" being assessed here is primarily related to safety, physical characteristics, and equivalence to a predicate, not diagnostic accuracy or clinical outcome improvement.
Based on the provided text, here's what can be extracted and what is not available:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
The document describes non-clinical testing performed to demonstrate that the device is similar to its predicate and meets safety/performance requirements. The "criteria" are implied by the successful meeting of test requirements for each evaluation.
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Temperature exiting canister similar to Predicate | Evaluation demonstrated the temperature exiting from the canister is similar to the Predicate. |
| Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1 (for compromised skin, <24h): - Cytotoxicity - Sensitization - Irritation - Acute Systemic Toxicity - Material Mediated Pyrogenicity | All test criteria were successfully met for each evaluation. |
| Stability for stated shelf-life limits (24 months): - Visual Inspection - Total Delivery - Pressure - Spray Rate - Leakage/Weight Loss - Microbiological | Test criteria were met at each assessment interval, which demonstrated the Subject Device's stability. |
| Non-flammable | Non-flammable (listed as a similarity to predicate) |
| Mechanism has positive shut-off release | Mechanism has positive shut-off release (listed as a similarity to predicate) |
2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified. The document refers to "evaluations" and "assessments" without quantification of the number of units or tests performed.
- Data Provenance: Not specified. These are laboratory-based non-clinical tests.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
This information is not applicable and not provided. The ground truth for this device's "performance" is based on physical and chemical testing standards and comparison to a predicate, not expert consensus on diagnostic interpretations.
4. Adjudication method for the test set:
Not applicable and not provided. Similarly to point 3, there's no diagnostic component requiring adjudication.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
Not applicable. This device is a vapocoolant, not a diagnostic AI system or a device intended to assist human readers. Therefore, no MRMC study was conducted. The document explicitly states "Clinical Testing: Not Applicable."
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
Not applicable. This is a physical device, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used:
The ground truth used for demonstrating the device's characteristics relies on:
- Physical and chemical measurements (e.g., temperature exiting canister, pressure, spray rate, leakage, boiling point).
- Standardized biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993-1).
- Comparison to the characteristics of the legally marketed predicate device.
8. The sample size for the training set:
Not applicable. This is a physical device, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a "training set."
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
Not applicable. See point 8.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
February 12, 2024
Nuance Medical, LLC Neal Hartman Regulatory Affairs/Quality Assurance 5931 Sea Lion Place, Suite 113 Carlsbad, California 92010
Re: K232674
Trade/Device Name: PainFreeze II Regulatory Class: Unclassified Product Code: MLY Dated: August 31, 2023 Received: September 1, 2023
Dear Neal Hartman:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Lauren E. Woodard -S
for Amber Ballard, PhD Assistant Director DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Rehabilitation Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K232674
Device Name PainFreeze II
Indications for Use (Describe)
PamFreeze II Medium Stream and Mist Spray are vapocoolants (skin refrigerants) intended for topical op skin. intact mucous membranes (oral cavity, nasal passageways and the lips) and minor open wounds. PainFreeze II's skin refrigerant controls pain associated with injections (venipuncture, IV starts, cosmetic procedures), minor surgical (lancing boils, incisions, drainage of small abscesses, and sutures), and the temporary relief of minor sports injuries (sprains, bruising, cuts and abrasions).
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Nuance Medical. The word "NUANCE" is written in large, bold, dark blue letters. Below it, the word "MEDICAL" is written in smaller, orange letters. The logo is framed by thin orange lines on the left and right sides.
K232674 - 510(K) SUMMARY
Submitter Information
| Company Name: | Nuance Medical, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Company Address: | 5931 Sea Lion Place, Suite 113Carlsbad, CA 92010 |
| Company Phone: | (760) 585-9548 |
| Company Facsimile: | (760) 235-4572 |
| Contact Person: | Neal HartmanRegulatory Affairs/Quality Assurancenealenhartman@gmail.com |
| Date: | January 29, 2024 |
Device Identification
| Device Trade Name: | PainFreeze II |
|---|---|
| Common Name: | Cold Spray (Skin Refrigerant) |
| Models: | #1830 - Mist Stray, 115ml#1831 - Medium Stream, 115ml#1832 - -Mist Spray, 35ml#1833 - Medium Stream, 35ml |
| Classification Name(s): | Vapocoolant Device |
| Regulation(s): | Unclassified |
| Device Class: | Unclassified |
| Product Code(s): | MLY |
ldentification of Predicate Devices
The System Device is substantially equivalent to the following device:
| Device Name | Classification Name/Regulation | ProductCode | 510(K)Number | ClearanceDate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain Freeze | Vapocoolant Device/ Unclassified | MLY | K162218 | 11/22/2016 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Common Name: Cold Spray – 245fa (1.1.1.3.3-Pentafluorpropane) and 134a (1.1.1.2-Tetrafluoroethane)
Device Description
The Subject Device consists of a chemical blend of 60% HFO-1233zd (Trans-1-chloro-3.3.3- trifluoropropene) and 40% HFO-1234ze (trans- 1.3.3.3-tetrafluoroprop-1- ene) that produces a cooling effect upon contact with the skin, intact mucous membranes, and minor open wounds. The product is delivered in the form of an aerosol in either a mist or stream spray. The device's delivery system controls the amount of chemical blend that is dispensed, the mist spray configuration produces very fine droplets that cools at the points of contact. The stream spray configuration produces a pinpoint stream that contacts the skin surface at a specific single location. Upon contact with the skin, the product begins to evaporate immediately as it contacts the skin. The low evaporation rate of the product's chemical blend is what creates the coldness. The Subject Device is non- flammable and has a lower global warming potential than the predicate and provides equivalent performance.
The Subject Device is topically sprayed onto the skin. It creates a cooling effect on the surface of the application site by the immediate evaporation of the product from the skin surface.
With both product configurations, the evaporation creates the cold sensation. As the distance from the target surface is increased, the dispersion of the droplets in both the mist and stream is increased. Increasing the surface area of contact and decreasing the size of the droplets increases the evaporation rate. The increase in evaporation rate correlates to an increase in the cooling effect.
The chemical blend is incorporated in pressurized canisters, which will be offered in two (2) volumes 35 and 115 ml. The canister consists of a high-pressure canister, valve, and actuator.
Indications for Use
PainFreeze II Medium Stream and Mist Spray are vapocoolants (skin refrigerants) intended for topical application to skin, intact mucous membranes (oral cavity, nasal passageways and the lips) and minor open wounds. PainFreeze II's skin refrigerant controls pain associated with iniections (venipuncture, IV starts, cosmetic procedures). minor surgical (lancing boils, incisions, drainage of small abscesses, and sutures), and the temporary relief of minor sports injuries (sprains, bruising, cuts and abrasions).
| Table 10.1: Comparison Table - Subject & Predicate Devices | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ComparisonFeature | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Similarities/Differences | |
| Device name | PainFreeze II | PainFreeze | ||
| Manufacturer | Nuance Medical, Inc. | Nuance Medical, Inc. | ||
| Indications for Use | PainFreeze II Medium Streamand Mist Spray arevapocoolants (skinrefrigerants) intended fortopical application to skin, | Pain Freeze Mist Spray andMedium Stream Spray arevapocoolants (skin refrigerants)intended for topical applicationto skin, intact mucous | Same with the exceptionof removing thestatement "Pain FreezeMedium Stream Sprayis also intended for the | |
| Table 10.1: Comparison Table – Subject & Predicate Devices | ||||
| ComparisonFeature | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Similarities/Differences | |
| intact mucous membranes(oral cavity, nasalpassageways, and the lips)and minor open wounds.PainFreeze II's skin refrigerantcontrols pain associated withinjections (venipuncture, IVstarts, cosmetic procedures),minor surgical (lancing boils,incisions, drainage of smallabscesses, and sutures), andthe temporary relief of minorsports injuries (sprains,bruising, cuts and abrasions). | membranes (oral cavity, nasalpassageways, and the lips) andminor open wounds. PainFreeze controls pain associatedwith injections (venipuncture, IVstarts, cosmetic procedures),minor surgical procedures (suchas lancing boils, incisions,drainage of small abscessesand sutures) and the temporaryrelief of minor sports injuries(sprains, bruising, cuts andabrasions). Pain FreezeMedium Stream Spray is alsointended for the management ofmyofascial pain, restrictedmotion and muscle tension. | management ofmyofascial pain,restricted motion andmuscle tension." Thisdoes not impact thesafety and efficacy ofthe device. | ||
| ProductConfigurations | Mist sprayMedium stream spray | Mist sprayMedium stream spray | Same | |
| ChemicalComposition | HFO-1233zd (Trans-1-chloro-3,3,3- trifluoropropene) 60%and HFO-1234ze (trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1- ene)40% | 1,1,1,3,3-Pentafluoropropane(HFC-245fa) 95% and 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a)5% | The formation of thedevice is different.Information incorporatedin the submissionsdemonstrates theformulation is safe andeffective. | |
| Container Size | 35ml, 115ml | 103.5ml | Volume offered differs,however there is noimpact on safety orefficacy | |
| Target Populations | Adults | Not Publicly Available | Safety and efficacy are notimpacted. | |
| Patient Contact | Skin | Skin | Same | |
| Energy Delivery | Thermal energy via refrigerantspray | Thermal energy via refrigerantspray | Same | |
| VapocoolantDischarge Method | Handheld spray containers.Button on actuator is pressed. | Depress the Actuator Button torelease the vapocoolant | Same | |
| Boiling Point | $-3.0±3°C$ | Not Publicly Available | A comparisonevaluation wasconducted, which thetemperature exiting thecanister is similar to thepredicate. Safety andefficacy are notimpacted. | |
| Mechanism ofAction & OperatingPrinciple | Cooling by application ofrefrigerant; Dispensing valveon canister is depressed torelease the refrigerant. | Depress the Actuator Button torelease the vapocoolant | Same | |
| Flammability | Non-flammable | Non-flammable | Same | |
| Mechanical Safety | Mechanism has positive shut-off release | Mechanism has positive shut-offrelease | Same | |
| Shelf-Life | 24 months | Not Publicly Available | Shelf-life may differ;however, stability testingis conducted, whichdemonstrates no impactto safety and efficacy. | |
| Storage &Transportation | Not to exceed 49°C | Not Publicly Available | Storage conditions mayvary; however,restrictions areindicated on the productlabeling. |
Summary of Technological Characteristics
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
Non-Clinical Testing
Assessments were performed that includes the following:
- Temperature Comparison - Evaluation demonstrated the temperature exiting from the canister is similar to the Predicate.
- Biocompatibility Evaluations were conducted per ISO 10993-1 Biological . evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process for devices in contact with compromised skin and a limited exposure (<24 hours). Evaluations included:
- Cytotoxicity O
- Sensitization O
- Irritation O
- o Acute Systemic Toxicity
- Material Mediated Pyrogenicity o
All test criteria were successfully met for each evaluation.
- Stability The following evaluations were conducted at various assessment ● intervals up to the stated shelf-life limits:
- o Visual Inspection
- Total Delivery O
- Pressure O
- Spray Rate o
- o Leakage/Weight Loss
- o Microbiological
Test criteria were met at each assessment interval, which demonstrated the Subject Device's stability.
Results of the evaluations demonstrate that the Subject Device met the safety and performance requirements as it relates to its indication for use and the Predicate.
Clinical Testing
Not Applicable
Conclusions
The results of the evaluation demonstrate that the Subject Device is substantially equivalent to the Predicate.
N/A