(231 days)
The MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer is an automated, immunoassay analyzer designed to perform in vitro diagnostic tests on clinical specimens.
The MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D is an in vitro chemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantitative determination of 25-OH Vitamin D (25-OH VD) in human serum and plasma using the MAGLUMI series Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer, and the assay is used for an aid in assessment of vitamin D sufficiency.
MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer:
The MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer is a fully automated instrument system designed to perform in vitro diagnostic tests on clinical specimens. The system utilizes chemiluminescent technology and uses pre-packaged reagent packs for qualitative or quantitative analysis of the analytes in human samples. The analyzer performs automatic sample pipetting, reagent loading, incubation, washing, measurements, and result calculations.
MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D assay:
MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D kit consists of the following reagents:
Magnetic Microbeads- coated with anti-25-OH VD antibody in PBS buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Calibrator Low- A low concentration of 25-OH VD antigen in Carbonate buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Calibrator High- A high concentration of 25-OH VD antigen in Carbonate buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Buffer- Acidic buffer ABEI Label- ABEI labeled with anti-25-OH VD antibody (~0.500 ug/mL) in PBS buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Control 1- A low concentration of 25-OH VD antigen in Carbonate buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Control 2- A high concentration of 25-OH VD antigen in Carbonate buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%).
The provided text describes the performance characteristics of the MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D assay and MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer as part of a 510(k) summary for FDA clearance. The information focuses on analytical performance rather than clinical validation with human-in-the-loop studies.
Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not explicitly present a table of predefined acceptance criteria. Instead, it reports the analytical performance of the device, which implicitly demonstrates that the device meets some internal or expected performance metrics for an in vitro diagnostic device. The performance data is presented in the "11. Performance Characteristics" section.
Here's an approximation of an acceptance criteria table based on the reported performance, assuming the reported values are the achieved performance that meets internal criteria for release:
| Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit from Reported Performance) | Reported Device Performance (MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D) |
|---|---|---|
| Precision | Calibrator Low (N=240) | |
| Repeatability (%CV) | ≤ 3.86% | 3.86% |
| Within Instrument Total (%CV) | ≤ 7.53% | 7.53% |
| Reproducibility (%CV) | ≤ 8.07% | 8.07% |
| Calibrator High (N=240) | ||
| Repeatability (%CV) | ≤ 1.58% | 1.58% |
| Within Instrument Total (%CV) | ≤ 2.73% | 2.73% |
| Reproducibility (%CV) | ≤ 2.76% | 2.76% |
| (Similar detail for Controls and Serum Pools as reported in the text) | (Specific values for each level and component) | (Specific values for each level and component) |
| Linearity | Correlation coefficient R² ≥ 0.9974 (for 1.8-195.0 ng/mL) | R² = 0.9974 |
| Relationship: Observed ≈ 1.0016 (Expected) - 0.4938 | Observed = 1.0016 (Expected) - 0.4938 | |
| Stability (Real-time) | Stable for 18 months at 2-8°C | 18 months @ 2-8°C |
| Detection Limit | ||
| Limit of Blank (LOB) | ≤ 0.95 ng/mL | 0.95 ng/mL |
| Limit of Detection (LOD) | ≤ 1.4 ng/mL | 1.4 ng/mL |
| Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) | ≤ 2.289 ng/mL (CV ≤ 20%) | 2.289 ng/mL |
| Interference | No significant interference (recovery ± 10% of initial value) at tested concentrations for: | Achieved for all tested substances at specified concentrations. |
| Cross-reactants | (Specific % cross-reactivity for listed substances) | Reported for 25-OH Vitamin D2, D3, etc. |
| Endogenous substances | (Specific highest concentrations for bilirubin, hemoglobin, etc.) | Reported for bilirubin, hemoglobin, etc. |
| Common drugs & substances | (Specific highest concentrations for Cefoxitin, Biotin, etc.) | Reported for Cefoxitin, Biotin, etc. |
| HAMA, RF, Total protein | (Specific highest concentrations for HAMA, RF, Total protein) | Reported for HAMA, RF, Total protein |
| Method Comparison | Passing-Bablok with predicate: Slope near 1, Intercept near 0, R near 1 | y=0.989x+0.249, R=0.997 |
| Matrix Comparison | Passing-Bablok for serum vs. plasma: Slope near 1, Intercept near 0, R² near 1 | y=0.977x-0.0256, R²=0.9938 |
| Reference Range | Established | 7.4 - 45.1 ng/mL |
2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
-
Precision Study:
- Sample Size: 240 measurements per material (two controls, two calibrators, one spiked patient serum pool, three native patient sample pools) across three instruments. Each measurement was taken in duplicate, with 2 runs per day over 20 days.
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but common practice for IVD analytical studies focuses on sample types and analytical conditions, not patient demographics or geo-location beyond what's relevant to endogenous interferents. The samples include "patient serum pool" and "native serum pool," implying human biological samples.
-
Linearity Study:
- Sample Size: Eleven linearity samples, each measured in quadruplicate on 3 lots of reagent.
- Data Provenance: Samples prepared by blending "a low serum sample pool and a high serum sample pool," implying human serum. No country of origin specified.
-
Detection Limit Study:
- LOB: 60 measurements of 25-OH Vitamin D depleted serum samples using 3 different lots of reagents over 3 days.
- LOD: Four levels of low samples, each measured in 60 replicates over 3 days per sample using 3 lots of reagents.
- LOQ: Six low serum samples, in five replicates per run, one run per day, over 3 days, using 3 lots of reagents.
- Data Provenance: "Serum samples," "low serum samples," implying human serum. No country of origin specified.
-
Interference Study:
- Sample Size: Three base serum samples (10, 50, 100 ng/mL 25-OH VD) for endogenous substances and common drugs; human serum samples for HAMA, RF, total protein.
- Data Provenance: "Human serum pools" and "human serum samples." No country of origin specified.
-
Method Comparison Study:
- Sample Size: 329 native, single donor patient serum samples (121 male, 208 female, age 7 to 98 years).
- Data Provenance: "Human serum samples." No country of origin specified explicitly, but this is typically retrospective collection of de-identified clinical samples.
-
Reference Range Study:
- Sample Size: 312 serum samples from normal, apparently healthy adult (21 years and older) individuals (181 males, 131 females).
- Data Provenance: Samples collected from three regions (Central, Southeast and Northeast) in the US. This specifies the country of origin (USA) and regional distribution. This would be considered retrospective.
-
Matrix Comparison Study:
- Sample Size: 78 serum/plasma pairs from the same donor.
- Data Provenance: "Samples drawn into serum and plasma collection tubes," "from the same donor." No country of origin specified.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This document describes an In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) device, specifically a quantitative immunoassay. For such devices, "ground truth" is typically established by:
- Reference methods (e.g., LC-MS/MS for Vitamin D, which is considered a gold standard).
- Master Lot/Calibrator values.
- Comparison to a legally marketed predicate device (as done in the "Comparison Studies" section).
There is no mention of human experts (like radiologists) establishing ground truth for individual samples in this context. The "ground truth" in this analytical study is the quantitative concentration of 25-OH Vitamin D as determined by reference materials, calibrators, or the established predicate method.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used in clinical studies involving qualitative or semi-quantitative assessments (e.g., image-based diagnosis) where multiple human readers interpret data, and discrepancies need to be resolved. This document pertains to the analytical performance of a quantitative immunoassay analyzer, where the output is a numerical concentration.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is an automated immunoassay analyzer for a quantitative biomarker (25-OH Vitamin D). It is not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that aids human readers in interpreting complex data like medical images. Therefore, an MRMC study or AI assistance is not relevant to its stated purpose or performance evaluation.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
The device is inherently a "standalone" system in an analytical sense. The MAGLUMI X3 analyzer and the MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D assay perform the quantitative determination automatically. The performance characteristics (precision, linearity, detection limit, interference, method comparison) are all tests of the algorithm's performance (i.e., the instrument and reagent system) without human interpretation affecting the result generation process itself. Clinical interpretation of the numerical results (e.g., patient has vitamin D deficiency based on the number) happens downstream by a clinician, but the device performance itself is standalone.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
For the analytical performance:
- Precision, Linearity, Detection Limit, Interference: Ground truth is established by the known concentrations of controls, calibrators, spiked samples, and highly characterized depleted/low concentration samples. The "truth" is the intended/expected concentration as determined by a highly accurate measurement or formulation.
- Method Comparison: The predicate device, MAGLUMI 2000 25-OH Vitamin D assay manufactured by SNIBE, served as the comparative "truth" or reference. The study measures agreement between the new device and the predicate. It states "Comparison of the MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D assay (y) with the predicate device, MAGLUMI 2000 25-OH Vitamin D assay (x)."
- Reference Range: Established from empirically tested healthy individuals.
8. The sample size for the training set
This document describes the validation of an immunoassay kit and analyzer, not a machine learning or AI model that requires a "training set" in the computational sense. The "training" for such a system refers to the development and optimization of the chemical reagents, assay protocol, and instrument calibration algorithms by the manufacturer during product development, prior to the validation studies described here. The document does not provide details on the sample sizes or data used during this internal "training" or development phase.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
As noted above, "training set" is not applicable in the context of a traditional immunoassay system validation as described here. The "ground truth" for the development and optimization of the assay would typically involve:
- Certified Reference Materials (CRMs): Substances with accurately known concentrations of the analyte, often traceable to international standards.
- Internal Reference Materials: Carefully prepared and validated in-house samples.
- Established Reference Methods: Highly accurate and precise methods (e.g., LC-MS/MS) used to characterize samples during development.
- Cross-validation with existing, well-characterized methods/platforms.
These elements guide the chemical formulation, antibody selection, and instrument parameter setting during the development phase.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. Underneath the square are the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
April 12, 2024
Shenzhen New Industries Biomedical Engineering Co., Ltd % Joe Shia Director LSI International Inc 504 East Diamond Ave., Suite H Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877
Re: K232587
Trade/Device Name: MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D, MAGLUMI X3 Fully auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1825 Regulation Name: Vitamin D Test System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MRG, JJE Dated: February 25, 2024 Received: February 26, 2024
Dear Joe Shia:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Paula V. Caposino -S
Paula Caposino, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K232587
Device Name MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer
Indications for Use (Describe)
The MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer is an automated, immunoassay analyzer designed to perform in vitro diagnostic tests on clinical specimens.
The MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D is an in vitro chemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantitative determination of 25-OH Vitamin D (25-OH VD) in human serum and plasma using the MAGLUMI series Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer, and the assay is used for an aid in assessment of vitamin D sufficiency.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
|---|
| ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) SUMMARY
K232587
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the
requirements of 21 CFR 807.92
-
- Date: April 11, 2024
-
- Submitter: Shenzhen New Industries Biomedical Engineering Co., Ltd. No.23, Jinxiu East Road, Pingshan District, 518122 Shenzhen, P.R. China
- Joe Shia 3. Contact person: LSI International Inc. 504 East Diamond Ave., Suite H Gaithersburg, MD 20877 Telephone: 240-505-7880 Email:shiajl(@yahoo.com
- MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D 4. Device Name: MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer
| Classification: | Class II (assay) and Class I (instrument) |
|---|---|
| ----------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| Product Code | CFR # | Product Name |
|---|---|---|
| MRG | 862.1825 | Vitamin D Test System |
| JJE | 862.2160 | Analyzer, Chemistry (Photometric, Discrete), For Clinical Use |
-
- Device Description:
MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer:
- Device Description:
The MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer is a fully automated instrument system designed to perform in vitro diagnostic tests on clinical specimens. The system utilizes chemiluminescent technology and uses pre-packaged reagent packs for qualitative or quantitative analysis of the analytes in human samples. The analyzer performs automatic sample pipetting, reagent loading, incubation, washing, measurements, and result calculations.
MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D assay:
MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D kit consists of the following reagents:
{4}------------------------------------------------
Magnetic Microbeads- coated with anti-25-OH VD antibody in PBS buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Calibrator Low- A low concentration of 25-OH VD antigen in Carbonate buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Calibrator High- A high concentration of 25-OH VD antigen in Carbonate buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Buffer- Acidic buffer ABEI Label- ABEI labeled with anti-25-OH VD antibody (~0.500 ug/mL) in PBS buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Control 1- A low concentration of 25-OH VD antigen in Carbonate buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%). Control 2- A high concentration of 25-OH VD antigen in Carbonate buffer, NaN3 (<0.1%).
-
- Intended Use:
The MAGLUMI X3 Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer is an automated, immunoassay analyzer designed to perform in vitro diagnostic tests on clinical specimens.
- Intended Use:
The MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D is an in vitro chemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantitative determination of 25-OH Vitamin D (25-OH VD) in human serum and plasma using the MAGLUMI series Fully-auto chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer, and the assay is used for an aid in assessment of vitamin D sufficiency.
-
- Standard/Guidance Documents
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP5-A3 – Evaluation of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: Approved Guideline-Third Edition.
- Standard/Guidance Documents
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP6-A - Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A statistical approach; Approved guideline
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP17-A2: Evaluation of detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP7-A2 - Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP9-A3 - Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline-Third Edition.
-
- Substantial Equivalence Information
Instrument Similarities and Differences
| Item | Predicate Device | Candidate Device |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use/Indication for Use | Automated, immunoassay analyzer designedto perform in vitro diagnostic tests on clinicalspecimens | Same |
| Principles of AssayOperation | Chemiluminescence using magnetic-particle solidphase and chemiluminescent label | Same |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Type of System | Random Access, Batch, STAT | Same |
|---|---|---|
| Throughput Rate | Up to 180 tests/hr | Up to 200 tests/hr |
| Optical System | PMT used in photon counting mode | Same |
| Sample Container | Sample cups or primary tubes may be used | Same |
| Dispense System | Automated pipetting of samples using precision syringe | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Serum and Plasma |
| Sample Volume | 5 to 200 µl | 10 to 200 µl |
| Reagent Volume | 10 to 200 µl | 10 to 450 µl |
Assay Similarities and Differences
| Item | Predicate Device | Candidate Device |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use/Indication forUse | For the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The measurement of25-OH Vitamin D is to be used in theassessment of vitamin D sufficiency. | Same |
| Specimen | Serum | Serum and K2 EDTA Plasma |
| Measurement | Quantitative | Same |
| Calibration | 2 point | Same |
| Calibrator | Calibrator Low and Calibrator High | Same |
| Automated | Yes | Same |
| Captureantibody | Magnetic microbeads coated with 25-OHVitamin D monoclonal antibody | Same |
| Test principle | Two-step Competitive chemiluminescenceimmunoassay (CLIA) | Sandwich chemiluminescenceimmunoassay (CLIA) |
| Measuringrange | 5.371-143 ng/ml | 5.371-150 ng/ml |
| Detection | ABEI-labeled 25-OH Vitamin D antigen | ABEI-labeled 25-OH Vitamin Dantibody |
| Sample size | 100 μL | 10 μL |
{6}------------------------------------------------
10. Test Principle
The 25-OH Vitamin D assay is a sandwich chemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantitative determination of total 25-OH vitamin D in human serum and plasma.
The sample, magnetic microbeads coated with anti-25-0H VD antibody and buffer are mixed thoroughly, incubating and performing a wash cycle after a precipitation in a magnetic field. ABEI labeled with another anti-25-OH VD antibody are then added, reacting to form sandwich complexes and incubating. After precipitation in a magnetic field, decant the supernatant, and then perform another wash cycle. Subsequently, the Starter 1+2 are added to initiate a chemiluminescent reaction. The light signal is measured by a photomultiplier as relative light units (RLUs), which is proportional to the concentration of 25-OH VD present in the sample.
11. Performance Characteristics
-
- Analytical Performance
- a. Precision
The precision was determined using the CLSI EP5-A3 protocol as a guide. The study was conducted on three different instruments with two controls, two calibrators, one spiked patient serum pool and three native patient sample pools. The data was collected over 20 days in duplicate with 2 runs per day with a total of 80 samples analyzed per level on each instrument. The results (in ng/mL) obtained are summarized in the following table:
| Sample | N | Mean(ng/mL) | Repeatability | Between-Run | Between-Day | Total(within instrument) | Reproducibility(across instruments) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | |||
| Calibrator Low | 240 | 6.986 | 0.270 | 3.86 | 0.214 | 3.06 | 0.398 | 5.70 | 0.526 | 7.53 | 0.564 | 8.07 |
| Calibrator High | 240 | 97.698 | 1.543 | 1.58 | 1.976 | 2.02 | 0.923 | 0.94 | 2.672 | 2.73 | 2.692 | 2.76 |
| Control 1 | 240 | 19.962 | 0.512 | 2.56 | 0.706 | 3.54 | 0.956 | 4.79 | 1.294 | 6.48 | 1.306 | 6.54 |
| Control 2 | 240 | 50.181 | 1.405 | 2.80 | 1.150 | 2.29 | 1.398 | 2.79 | 2.292 | 4.57 | 2.292 | 4.57 |
| Spiked serum pool | 240 | 130.310 | 0.770 | 0.59 | 2.024 | 1.55 | 0.508 | 0.39 | 2.224 | 1.71 | 2.305 | 1.77 |
| Native Serum Pool 1 | 240 | 30.084 | 1.027 | 3.41 | 0.626 | 2.08 | 1.294 | 4.30 | 1.766 | 5.87 | 1.766 | 5.87 |
| Native Serum Pool 2 | 240 | 8.376 | 0.469 | 5.60 | 0.251 | 3.00 | 0.299 | 3.57 | 0.610 | 7.28 | 0.610 | 7.28 |
| Native Serum Pool 3 | 240 | 100.082 | 1.022 | 1.02 | 2.128 | 2.13 | 0.517 | 0.52 | 2.417 | 2.42 | 2.417 | 2.41 |
b. Linearity
The linearity of the MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D method was determined following the CLSI EP6-A procedure. Eleven levels of linearity samples were prepared by blending a low serum sample pool and a high serum sample pool to span the whole measuring range with 25-OH Vitamin D concentrations from 1.8 to 195.0 ng/mL. Each sample was measured in quadruple on 3 lots of reagent. Linearity was evaluated using
{7}------------------------------------------------
regression analysis based on CLSI EP6-A.
The assays are linear between 1.8 and 195.0 ng/mL with the following relationship: Observed = 1.0016 (Expected) - 0.4938, R2 = 0.9974
-
Stability c.
Real time stability study showed that both controls and reagent kits are stable for 18 months at 2-8°C. -
d. Detection Limit
Detection limit studies were performed following CLSI EP17-A2 guidelines.
The limit of blank (LOB) is the 95th percentile value from 60 measurements of 25-OH Vitamin D depleted serum samples using 3 different lots of 25-OH Vitamin D reagents over 3 days. The LOB corresponds to the concentration below which analyte-free samples are found with a probability of 95% and was determined to be 0.95 ng/mL.
The limit of detection (LOD) is determined based on the LOB and the standard deviation of low concentration samples. The LOD corresponds to the lowest analyte concentration which can be detected. Four level of low samples were measured in 60 replicates over 3 days per sample using 3 lots of reagents. LOD was determined to be 1.4 ng/mL.
The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was determined by measuring six low serum samples, in five replicates per run, one run per day, over 3 days, using 3 lots of reagents. LOQ is defined as the lowest analyte concentration that can be reproducibly measured with an intermediate precision CV of ≤ 20% and was determined to be 2.289 ng/mL.
- Interference e.
A cross reactivity study was performed using three base serum samples containing total 25-OH VD 10 ng/mL, 50 ng/mL and 100 ng/mL respectively. These samples were spiked with various cross reactants and measured for these solutions using 3 lots of reagents. The following table shows cross reactivity of potential cross reactant.
| Cross Reactant | %Cross-reactivity |
|---|---|
| 25-OH Vitamin D2 | 100.41% |
| 25-OH Vitamin D3 | 98.17% |
| Vitamin D2 | -0.33% |
| Vitamin D3 | 0.18% |
| 1,25-(OH)2-Vitamin D3 | 0.19% |
| 1,25-(OH)2-Vitamin D2 | 0.03% |
| 3-epi-25OH D3 | 0.46% |
{8}------------------------------------------------
The effect of endogenous substances were evaluated using human serum pools. For each substance, three serum samples containing 10, 50 and 100 ng/mL concentration of 25-OH Vitamin D were analyzed, the highest concentration of interferents were listed below at which no significant interference was observed.
| Potential Interferent | Highest concentration tested at which nosignificant interference is observed (mg/dL) |
|---|---|
| Conjugated bilirubin | 60 |
| Unconjugated bilirubin | 42.5 |
| Hemoglobin | 250 |
| triglyceride | 500 |
| Uric acid | 20 |
| Cholesterol | 300 |
The effect of common drugs and interference substances were evaluated using human serum pools. For each substance, three serum samples containing 10, 50 and 100ng/mL concentration of 25-OH Vitamin D were analyzed. The substances and the highest concentration tested which did not cause significant interference are listed below.
| Potential Interferent | Highest concentration tested at which no significant interference is observed (mg/dL) |
|---|---|
| Cefoxitin | 340 |
| Levodopa | 3.25 |
| Metronidazole | 12.3 |
| Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) | 16.95 |
| Acetaminophen | 15.6 |
| Biotin | 5 |
| Cyclosporine | 0.6 |
| Rifampicin | 6.5 |
| Doxycycline | 3.2 |
| Theophylline | 11.4 |
The effect of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA), rheumatoid factor (RF) and human serum total protein was evaluated using human serum samples. Each potential interferent was added to 25-OH Vitamin D human serum samples and tested using 3 lots of reagents. For all substances tested, no significant interference was defined as recovery ± 10% of initial value. The potential interferents and the highest concentration tested which did not cause significant interference are listed below.
| Potential Interferent | Highest concentration tested at which no |
|---|---|
| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
{9}------------------------------------------------
| significant interference is observed | |
|---|---|
| HAMA | 401 ng/mL |
| RF | 1745 IU/mL |
| Total protein | 6.25 g/dL |
2. Comparison Studies
A method comparison study was performed with 329 human serum samples with concentrations ranging from 5.933 to 142.1 ng/mL. In the study, 329 native, single donor patient (121 male, 208 female, age 7 to 98 years) serum samples were tested on the candidate devices and the comparator method. The comparison of the MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D assay (y) with the predicate device, MAGLUMI 2000 25-OH Vitamin D assay (x), produced the following
Passing-Bablok: y=0.989x+0.249, R=0.997
-
- Expected values/Reference range:
A total of 312 serum samples from normal, apparently healthy adult (21 years and older) individuals were tested according to the procedure in CLSI EP28-A3c. The expected normal range is 7.4 - 45.1 ng/mL based on the central 95% of the frequency distribution.
- Expected values/Reference range:
The 312 samples were collected from three regions (Central, Southeast and Northeast) in the US, including 181 males and 131 females. The whole samples met following season distribution:
| Season | Spring | Summer | Autumn | Winter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples size | 109 | 78 | 28 | 97 |
| Percentage | 35% | 25% | 9% | 31% |
-
- Matrix Comparison:
A matrix comparison study was conducted by comparing values obtained from samples drawn into serum and plasma collection tubes. The result of the serum sample was compared with the result of each plasma sample from the same donor. Total 78 serum/plasma pairs were tested. The results show the following:
- Matrix Comparison:
Passing-Bablok: y=0.977x-0.0256, R2=0.9938
-
- Clinical Studies:
Not applicable.
- Clinical Studies:
12. Conclusion
Based on the test principle and acceptable performance characteristics including precision, interference, specificity and method comparison of the device, it is concluded that the MAGLUMI 25-OH Vitamin D is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
§ 862.1825 Vitamin D test system.
(a)
Identification. A vitamin D test system is a device intended for use in clinical laboratories for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) and other hydroxylated metabolites of vitamin D in serum or plasma to be used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). Vitamin D test systems must comply with the following special controls:(1) Labeling in conformance with 21 CFR 809.10 and
(2) Compliance with existing standards of the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.