(505 days)
No
The device description and performance studies focus on mechanical properties, sterilization, and biocompatibility, with no mention of AI or ML.
No.
The device acts as a sterile tamper-evident cap for IV syringes to indicate access and restrict removal of the Luer Lock Cap; it does not directly treat or diagnose a disease or condition.
No
This device is described as a "Tamper Evident Cap" for IV syringes, designed to indicate if the syringe has been accessed. Its intended use is to provide a sterile, tamper-evident seal, not to diagnose any medical condition or disease.
No
The device description clearly outlines physical components (polystyrene outer sleeve, polypropylene tip cap, breakaway ring) and a sterilization method (Ethylene Oxide), indicating it is a physical medical device, not software-only.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is "as a sterile tamper evident cap for IV syringes." This describes a physical barrier and indicator of tampering for a medical device (syringes), not a device used to examine specimens derived from the human body to provide information for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of disease.
- Device Description: The description details the physical components and mechanism of the cap. It does not mention any reagents, assays, or analysis of biological samples.
- Lack of IVD Indicators: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples, detecting analytes, or providing diagnostic information.
- Performance Studies: The performance studies focus on physical properties (ISO standards for connectors) and biocompatibility, not analytical performance related to biological samples.
IVD devices are specifically designed to perform tests on samples like blood, urine, tissue, etc., to provide information about a person's health status. This device serves a different purpose related to the integrity and sterility of a syringe.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
Tamper Evident Caps (Sterile) are indicated for use as a sterile tamper evident cap for IV syringes.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
FMF
Device Description
The International Medical Industries, Inc. Tamper Evident Cap consists of a polystyrene outer sleeve and bottom cover and a polypropylene tip cap held in place by a breakaway ring integrated into the sleeve. Evidence of access to the Luer lock cap is achieved by physically breaking the connection and removing the polystyrene outer sleeve exposing the Luer lock cap. Removal of the Luer Lock Cap is restricted by the presence of the sleeve. The restrictive sleeve and cap are available in multiple colors (cosmetic purposes only) in individual blister packs and trays of 10. The Luer Lock Caps are provided sterile to the end user. The sterilization method used is Ethylene Oxide.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Non-Clinical Performance Data: The testing was conducted as part of the Design Control process for the TEC product family to keep current with the latest ISO standard, 80369. For this product line, the applicable standards are ISO 80369-7:2016, "Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications – Part 7 Connectors for intravascular or hypodermic applications", and ISO 80369-20:2015 "Common test methods". The acceptance criteria stipulated in the design verification protocol for the TEC product family, which was based on ISO 80369-7:2016 and ISO 80369-20:2015 have been met. TEC passes ISO 80369 testing and associated standards and is therefore considered verified. Additionally, the Tamper Evident Caps have undergone a complete set of biocompatibility testing: ASTM Hemolysis Study Extract Method [(ASTM) F756-17 ISO 10993-4:2017, ISO 10993-12:2021], Cytotoxicity Study Using the ISO Elution Method [ISO 10993-5:2009, ISO 10993-12:2021, ISO 10993-1:2018], Infrared Spectroscopy [ISO 10993-18:2020 / A1:2022], ISO Acute Systemic Toxicity Study [ISO 10993-1:2018, ISO 10993-11:2017], ISO Guinea Pig Maximization Sensitization Test [ISO 10993-10:2021], ISO Intracutaneous Irritation Study - Extract [ISO 10993-23:2021], Microscopic Particle Count Test [USP 788], Particulate Analysis - Device - Light Obscuration Method [USP 788], USP Rabbit Pyrogen Study Material Mediated [ISO 10993-11:2017]. Tamper Evident Caps have undergone nonclinical testing to support their substantial equivalence to the predicate device. Tamper Evident Caps have passed the required testing. Material differences between the subject device and the predicate device are the same as our company's cleared reference device K193192. There are no additional safety or effectiveness differences between the subject and the predicate devices. Therefore, the Tamper Evident Caps are substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device K861276.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 880.5860 Piston syringe.
(a)
Identification. A piston syringe is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of a calibrated hollow barrel and a movable plunger. At one end of the barrel there is a male connector (nozzle) for fitting the female connector (hub) of a hypodermic single lumen needle. The device is used to inject fluids into, or withdraw fluids from, the body.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left and features a stylized human figure. The FDA logo is on the right and includes the FDA acronym in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
September 4, 2024
International Medical Industries, Inc. David Meily VP of Regulatory Affairs and Quality 2981 Gateway Drive Pompano Beach, Florida 33069
Re: K231095
Trade/Device Name: Tamper Evident Cap Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5860 Regulation Name: Piston Syringe Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FMF Dated: August 2, 2024 Received: August 5, 2024
Dear David Meily:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
1
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shruti N. Mistry -S
Shruti Mistry Assistant Director Division of Drug Delivery and General Hospital Devices, and Human Factors Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn, General Hospital, and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K231095
Device Name Tamper Evident Cap
Indications for Use (Describe) Tamper Evident Caps (Sterile) are indicated for use as a sterile tamper evident cap for IV syringes.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for IMI. The logo consists of a blue square with white curved lines inside, followed by the letters "IMI" in black. The "I"s are simple vertical lines, and the "M" is a pointed shape.
510(k) Summary Tamper Evident Caps K231095
1. Submission Sponsor
International Medical Industries, Inc. 2981 Gateway Drive. Pompano Beach FL, 33069 USA Contact: David Meily Title: VP Quality & Regulatory Affairs
2. Submission Correspondent
Not applicable
Date Prepared 3.
30 August 2024
4. Device Identification
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | Tamper Evident Cap |
|---|---|
| Common/Usual Name: | syringe, piston |
| Classification Name: | syringe, piston |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 880.5860 |
| Product Code: | FMF |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Classification Panel: | General Hospital |
5. Legally Marketed Predicate Device(s)
| Predicate Device: | Tamper Evident Cap |
|---|---|
| 510(k) Number: | K861276 |
| Common/Usual Name: | syringe, piston |
| Classification Name: | syringe, piston |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 880.5860 |
| Product Code: | FMF |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Classification Panel: | General Hospital |
4
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for IMI. The logo consists of a blue square with three curved white lines inside, followed by the letters "IMI" in black. A small "R" in a circle is located to the upper right of the last "I".
Indication for Use Statement 6.
Tamper Evident Caps (Sterile) are indicated for use as a sterile tamper evident cap for IV syringes.
Device Description 7.
The International Medical Industries, Inc. Tamper Evident Cap consists of a polystyrene outer sleeve and bottom cover and a polypropylene tip cap held in place by a breakaway ring integrated into the sleeve. Evidence of access to the Luer lock cap is achieved by physically breaking the connection and removing the polystyrene outer sleeve exposing the Luer lock cap. Removal of the Luer Lock Cap is restricted by the presence of the sleeve. The restrictive sleeve and cap are available in multiple colors (cosmetic purposes only) in individual blister packs and trays of 10. The Luer Lock Caps are provided sterile to the end user. The sterilization method used is Ethylene Oxide.
Substantial Equivalence Discussion 8.
| Parameter | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Substantial Equivalence
Determination |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) | K230195 | K861276 | N/A |
| Company Name | International Medical
Industries, Inc. | International Medical
Industries, Inc. | N/A |
| Status | Pending 510(k) review | Commercially
available | N/A |
| Indications for Use | Tamper Evident Caps
(Sterile) are indicated
for use as a sterile
tamper evident cap
for IV syringes. | Tamper Evident Caps
(Sterile) are indicated
for use as a sterile
tamper evident cap
for IV syringes. | Same as Predicate Device |
| Classification | Class II | Class II | Same as Predicate Device |
| Regulation Number | 880.5860 | 880.5860 | Same as Predicate Device |
| Product Code | FMF | FMF | Same as Predicate Device |
| Number of Uses | Single use, Rx only | Single use, Rx only | Same as Predicate Device |
| Material (sleeve
and bottom cap) | Polystyrene | Polystyrene | Same as Predicate Device |
| Material (tip cap) | ExxonMobil™
PP9074MED
Polypropylene
Random Copolymer | LyondellBasell Pro-fax
6523 Polypropylene
Homopolymer | Subject Device differs from
Predicate Device, but same
as Reference Device
(K193192). Overall, no
impact on Safety and
Equivalence |
| Biocompatibility | Limited | Limited | Same as Predicate Device |
| Sterilization Method | Ethylene Oxide | Ethylene Oxide | Same as Predicate Device |
| Shelf Life / Expiration | 3 years | 3 years | Same as Predicate Device |
| Electrical, chemical,
thermal, radiation safety,
anatomical site, energy
used/delivered | Not applicable | Not applicable | N/A |
| Applicable Test Standards | ISO 80369-7 | ISO 80369-7 | Same as Predicate Device |
5
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for IMI. The logo consists of a blue square with three curved white lines inside, followed by the letters IMI in black. There is a registered trademark symbol to the right of the last I.
| Parameter | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Substantial Equivalence
Determination |
|-------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Visual Comparison | Image: Blue cylindrical device | Image: Clear cylindrical device | Same as Predicate Device |
A comparison of the Subject Device (K230195) to the currently marketed Predicate Device (K861276) indicates the following similarities:
- Intended Use / Indications for use .
- Operating Principle
- Mechanism of action
- . Performance
- Shelf Life
- . Sterilization process and requirements
- Packaging configuration and materials
- . Material for the Sleeve and Bottom Cap
When compared to the Predicate Device (K861276), the Tamper Evident Caps (K230195), the Subject Device, has the following difference:
- Material used for Tip Cap [(Subject Device: ExxonMobil™ PP9074MED Polypropylene Random Copolymer) and (Predicate Device: LyondellBasell Pro-fax 6523 Polypropylene Homopolymer)
The material difference is addressed through the comparison to the Reference Device , the Tamper Evident Cap (K193192), which utilizes the same material as the Subject Device.
The safety and effectiveness of the TEC Subject Device are supported by the testing rationale and data provided, materials information, and comparison of design characteristics as found in the comparison table above. The testing provided supports the substantial equivalence of the Tamper Evident Cap Subject Device proposed material from that of the Predicate Device and poses no new questions of safety and effectiveness, including shelf life, when compared to the predicate device. No new hazards or risks were identified as a result of the material change. The Subject Device's material remains biocompatible as evidenced in the testing.
Non-Clinical Performance Data 9.
The testing was conducted as part of the Design Control process for the TEC product family to keep current with the latest ISO standard, 80369. For this product line, the applicable standards are ISO 80369-7:2016, "Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications – Part 7 Connectors for intravascular or hypodermic applications", and ISO 80369-20:2015 "Common test methods".
6
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for IMI. On the left side of the logo is a blue square with three curved white lines inside. To the right of the square are the letters "IMI" in black. A circled "R" is in the upper right corner of the logo.
The acceptance criteria stipulated in the design verification protocol for the TEC product family, which was based on ISO 80369-7:2016 and ISO 80369-20:2015 have been met. TEC passes ISO 80369 testing and associated standards and is therefore considered verified.
Additionally, the Tamper Evident Caps have undergone a complete set of biocompatibility testing:
- ASTM Hemolysis Study Extract Method [(ASTM) F756-17 ISO 10993-4:2017, ISO 10993-● 12:2021]
- . Cytotoxicity Study Using the ISO Elution Method [ISO 10993-5:2009, ISO 10993-12:2021, ISO 10993-1:2018]
- Infrared Spectroscopy [ISO 10993-18:2020 / A1:2022]
- . ISO Acute Systemic Toxicity Study [ISO 10993-1:2018, ISO 10993-11:2017]
- ISO Guinea Pig Maximization Sensitization Test [ISO 10993-10:2021]
- ISO Intracutaneous Irritation Study - Extract [ISO 10993-23:2021]
- . Microscopic Particle Count Test [USP 788]
- Particulate Analysis - Device - Light Obscuration Method [USP 788]
- . USP Rabbit Pyrogen Study Material Mediated [ISO 10993-11:2017]
Tamper Evident Caps have undergone nonclinical testing to support their substantial equivalence to the predicate device. Tamper Evident Caps have passed the required testing. Material differences between the subject device and the predicate device are the same as our company's cleared reference device K193192. There are no additional safety or effectiveness differences between the subject and the predicate devices. Therefore, the Tamper Evident Caps are substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device K861276.
10. Clinical Performance Data
There was no human clinical testing required to support the medical device as the indications for use are equivalent to the predicate device.
11. Conclusion
In summary, the Tamper Evident Cap (K231095) is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, Tamper Evident Caps cleared through K861276, in that it has the same intended use, Indications for Use, and sterilization method, and it meets the same test standard (ISO 80369-7). Where there are differences in materials used in the tip cap for the subject device versus the predicate device, the materials used for the subject device are the same as our company's cleared reference device K193192. Overall, the Tamper Evident Cap (K231095) does not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness when compared to the predicate device, and the data presented supports a determination of Substantial Equivalence.