(28 days)
The 360CAS is indicated for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified.
The 360CAS Knee is indicated for the following surgical procedures:
- · Any form of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
- · For conditions of the knee joint in which the use of computer assisted surgery may be appropriate
The 360CAS Hip is indicated for the following surgical procedures:
· Any form of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) e.g., open or minimally invasive, where a posterior or anterior approach is used
· For conditions of the hip joint in which the use of computer assisted surgery may be appropriate
The 360 Computer Assisted Surgery (360CAS) is a stereotaxic surgical navigation system for orthopaedic surgical procedures. The 360CAS is intended to be used as a planning and intraoperative quidance system with any manufacturers implant in open or percutaneous orthopaedic surgical procedures. The 360CAS uses optical tracking technology that allows surgeons to map subject's morphology, navigate surgical instruments and implants and assess state of the joint throughout the surgery. The system consists of 360CAS navigation software, which consists of two modules: 360CAS Knee and 360CAS Hip, surgical instruments, spatial tracking components and a navigation cart. 360CAS Knee is a 360CAS navigation software for knee replacement surgery. 360CAS Hip is a 360CAS navigation software for hip replacement surgery. The navigation software interfaces with the optical trackers which are attached to navigation instruments (e.g., pointer, bone fixator(s)).
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them, based on the provided FDA 510(k) summary:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| System Accuracy (Translational Error) | < ±2 mm |
| System Accuracy (Rotational Error) | < ±1° |
| Electrical Safety | Complied with IEC 60601-1-2:2014 |
| Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) | Complied with IEC 60601-1-2:2014 |
| Software Verification & Validation | Successfully completed (software considered "MAJOR" level of concern) |
| Functionality | All functional requirements fulfilled |
| System Integration & Compatibility | All system components (application, computer, accessories) are compatible |
| Risk Control Measures Effectiveness | Safety testing verified effectiveness of all risk controls |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document indicates that "Sawbones mimicking patient's anatomy" were used for system accuracy testing and clinical workflow verification. However, the specific sample size (i.e., number of Sawbones or tests conducted) is not explicitly provided.
- Data Provenance: The tests were conducted using Sawbones, which are synthetic bone models, rather than actual patient data or cadavers. This suggests a bench-top testing environment, and thus the data is not tied to a specific country of origin in the same way clinical data would be. The testing is prospective in the sense that the device's performance was evaluated against a predefined protocol using these models.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
The document does not specify the number of experts used to establish ground truth or their qualifications for the bench performance testing.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
The document does not describe any adjudication method for the test set. Given that the testing involved Sawbones and objective measurements against known accuracy standards, a formal adjudication process involving multiple human reviewers might not have been deemed necessary in the same way it would be for subjective clinical assessments.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. The device (360CAS Knee and 360CAS Hip) is a computer-assisted surgical navigation system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that would typically involve human readers interpreting images. Therefore, the concept of "human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance" does not directly apply to this device's reported evaluation. No effect size is mentioned.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Yes, the performance testing described appears to be a standalone (algorithm only) evaluation. The "System accuracy testing verifying the specified accuracy" and the "functional testing" assess the device's ability to perform its core functions and meet accuracy specifications independently of a human surgeon's real-time subjective assessment or intervention during the measurement process. The context is measuring the device's inherent accuracy and functionality.
7. The type of ground truth used
The ground truth used for performance testing was based on:
- Standardized test procedures and known measurements: For the ASTM accuracy testing (ASTM F2554-18 and ASTM F2554-22).
- Engineered precision/known values: For the "System accuracy testing verifying the specified accuracy of ±2mm and ±1º using Sawbones." This implies that the 'true' or target measurements on the Sawbones were precisely known or set.
8. The sample size for the training set
The document does not provide information on a "training set" as this device is a navigation system and not a machine learning or AI-based diagnostic algorithm that typically undergoes a distinct training phase with a labeled dataset. While software verification and validation were conducted, these generally involve testing the implemented code against requirements, rather than training a model.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
As there is no mention of a training set in the context of machine learning, there is no information on how its ground truth would have been established. The device instead relies on established mechanical and optical principles for navigation.
{0}------------------------------------------------
January 27, 2023
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Kico Knee Innovation Company Pty Limited Danyon Munro Head of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Suite 3, Building 1, 20 Bridge Street, Pymble NSW Sydney, New South Wales 2073 Australia
Re: K223927
Trade/Device Name: 360CAS Knee, 360CAS Hip Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLO Dated: December 30, 2022 Received: December 30, 2022
Dear Danyon Munro:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Jesse Muir-S
For: Shumaya Ali, M.P.H. Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative, Repair and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K223927
Device Name 360CAS Knee and 360CAS Hip
Indications for Use (Describe)
The 360CAS is indicated for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified.
The 360CAS Knee is indicated for the following surgical procedures:
- · Any form of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
- · For conditions of the knee joint in which the use of computer assisted surgery may be appropriate
The 360CAS Hip is indicated for the following surgical procedures:
· Any form of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) e.g., open or minimally invasive, where a posterior or anterior approach is used
· For conditions of the hip joint in which the use of computer assisted surgery may be appropriate
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image is a logo for "360 Med Care". The logo features the number "360" in a bold, sans-serif font, with the words "MED CARE" in a smaller font size underneath. The logo also includes a circular design element that wraps around the number "360". The circular design is made up of a combination of gray and blue dots, with a gray arrow at the top of the circle.
4. 510(k) Summary - K223927
4.1 INTRODUCTION
A 510(k) summary has been prepared in accordance with:
- The requirements of 21 CFR 807.92 Content and Format of a 510(k) ● Summary,
- . Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)] issued 28-Jul-2014,
- . Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: The Special 510(k) Program issued 13-Sep-2019.
- . Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration: Bundling Multiple Devices or Multiple Indications in a Single Submission issued 22-Jun-2007, and
- . Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: Refuse to Accept Policy for 510(k)s issued 13-Sep-2019.
4.2 510(K) Summary
4.2.1 Applicant Details
| Name: | Kico Knee Innovation Company PtyLimited |
|---|---|
| Address: | Suite 3, Building 1, 20 Bridge Street |
| Pymble, New South Wales 2073 | |
| Australia | |
| Contact Person /Prepared By: | Danyon Munro |
| Head of Regulatory Affairs and Head ofQuality Assurance | |
| +61 435 677 481 (phone) | |
| danyon.munro@360med.care |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Date Prepared:
December 30, 2022
4.2.2 Device Details and Substantial Equivalence Claim
| Device Common Name: | Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument | |
|---|---|---|
| Device Trade Name: | 360CAS Knee | 360CAS Hip |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 882.4560 | |
| Regulation Name: | Stereotaxic Instrument | |
| Regulatory Class: | II | |
| Panel | Orthopedic | |
| Classification ProductCode | OLO | |
| Predicate Devices | 360CAS Knee(K213380) | 360CAS Hip(K213380) |
Device Description 4.2.3
The 360 Computer Assisted Surgery (360CAS) is a stereotaxic surgical navigation system for orthopaedic surgical procedures. The 360CAS is intended to be used as a planning and intraoperative quidance system with any manufacturers implant in open or percutaneous orthopaedic surgical procedures. The 360CAS uses optical tracking technology that allows surgeons to map subject's morphology, navigate surgical instruments and implants and assess state of the joint throughout the surgery. The system consists of 360CAS navigation software, which consists of two modules: 360CAS Knee and 360CAS Hip, surgical instruments, spatial tracking components and a navigation cart. 360CAS Knee is a 360CAS navigation software for knee replacement surgery. 360CAS Hip is a 360CAS navigation software for hip replacement surgery. The navigation software interfaces with the optical trackers which are attached to navigation instruments (e.g., pointer, bone fixator(s)).
The subject device is predicated on submission (K213380). The modification driving the subject device submission relates to the change of the spatial tracking component sub-system. The previously cleared device incorporated a tracking camera manufactured by Metria Innovation Inc., whereas the subject device will utilise a tracking camera manufactured by Atracsys LLC.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows a navigation system for medical procedures. The system includes a navigation camera, navigation software, trackers, and a navigation cart. The navigation camera is used to track the position of the trackers, which are attached to the patient's body. The navigation software uses this information to create a 3D model of the patient's anatomy, which the surgeon can use to guide the procedure.
Figure 4-1 - 360CAS Navigation System (Metria)
Image /page/5/Figure/3 description: The image shows a navigation system for medical procedures. On the left is a navigation cart with a navigation camera and software. On the right is a model of a pelvis with trackers attached to it.
Figure 4-2 - 360CAS Navigation System (Atracsys)
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows two panels related to medical imaging. The left panel, titled "Register Femur," displays a 3D model of a femur with several points marked, along with a checklist of anatomical features such as "Hip Centre," "Femoral Centre," and "Medial Epicondyle." The right panel, titled "Cup Orientation," presents two views of a pelvis model, accompanied by measurements for "Inclination" and "Anteversion," with values of 40 degrees and 20 degrees, respectively. The interface includes buttons for actions like "Transfer," "Revert," "Confirm," and "Delete."
Figure 4-3 - 360CAS Knee Software
Figure 4-4 – 360CAS Hip Software
4.2.4 Indications for Use for 360CAS
The Indications for Use for 360CAS remains unchanged from the cleared device. It has been included below for clarity.
The 360CAS is intended to be used as a planning and intraoperative guidance system to enable open or percutaneous image quided surgical procedures.
The 360CAS is indicated for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the pelvis, femur, or tibia, can be identified.
The 360CAS Knee is indicated for the following surgical procedures:
- Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).
- · For conditions of the knee joint in which the use of computer assisted surgery may be appropriate.
The 360CAS Hip is indicated for the following surgical procedures:
- · Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) e.g., open or minimally invasive, where a posterior or anterior approach is used.
• For conditions of the hip joint in which the use of computer assisted surgery may be appropriate.
4.2.5 Performance Data
The following performance data was provided in support of substantial equivalence decision:
Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Testing
{7}------------------------------------------------
Electrical safety and EMC testing were conducted on the subject device in accordance with the following standards:
- IEC 60601-1-2:2014 Medical electrical equipment Part 1-2: General . requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests (FDA Recognition #: 19-8)
Software Verification and Validation Testing
Software verification and validation testing were conducted, and summary information was provided as recommended by:
- Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: . Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices issued 11-May-2005
- . Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: Offthe-Shelf Use in Medical Devices issued 27-Sep-2019
The 360CAS Navigation Software was considered as a "MAJOR" level of concern.
Performance Testing - Bench
The following design verification and validation activities have been performed to ensure the correct functionality of the system as it has been specified:
- ASTM accuracy testing verifying the accuracy performance of the ● spatial tracking technology using the standardized test procedure according to ASTM F2554-18 and ASTM F2554-22.
- . System accuracy testing verifying the specified accuracy of ±2mm and ±1º using Sawbones mimicking patient's anatomy.
- . Clinical workflow verifying that all system components (application, computer platform and accessories) are compatible. Complete knee and hip arthroplasty procedures were simulated using Sawbones mimicking the patient's anatomy.
- . Functional testing to ensure that all functional requirements are fulfilled.
- . Safety testing verifying the effectiveness of all risk controls determined in the device risk analysis.
This strategy ensures the verification of the accuracy, system integration, software algorithms, system functionality, and correct implementation of the risk control measures. All tests have been successfully completed.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Animal Study
No animal studies were performed to support substantial equivalence.
Clinical Studies
No clinical studies were performed to support substantial equivalence.
Comparison with the Predicates 4.2.6
Substantial Equivalence Rationale - 360CAS Knee
The 360CAS Knee is considered substantially equivalent to the previously cleared 360CAS Knee regarding clinical, technical, and biological characteristics. The 360CAS Knee and the previously cleared 360CAS Knee are both intended to be used as planning and intraoperative guidance systems to enable open and percutaneous surgical procedures. Both systems are indicated for knee conditions where the use of CAS is appropriate (e.g., TKA) and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified. The 360CAS Knee and the previously cleared 360CAS Knee are intended to be used by trained orthopedic surgeons and operators in an equivalent fashion, following equivalent registration and navigation workflows. Both systems comprise equivalent components (computer platform, navigation software, instruments, tracking components) to achieve the same purpose. The 360CAS Knee and previously cleared 360CAS Knee both require AC power to power the computer, monitor and camera. Both systems use optical tracking technology where a tracker is sensed by a camera to compute spatial information. Surgical navigation in both systems is enabled through the same software platform developed by Kico Knee Innovation Company Pty Limited. The 360CAS Knee and the previously cleared 360CAS Knee are measuring devices with identical accuracy of ±2 mm and ±1º. Therefore, it is concluded that the 360CAS Knee is substantially equivalent to the previously cleared 360CAS Knee.
| Characteristic | 360CAS Knee(Subject Device) | 360CAS Knee(Predicate Device) |
|---|---|---|
| Trade Name: | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | 360CAS Knee |
| 510(k)Submitter: | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Kico Knee InnovationCompany Pty Limited |
| Characteristic | 360CAS Knee(Subject Device) | 360CAS Knee(Predicate Device) |
| 510(k) Number: | Under Review | K213380 |
| Regulation Number: | Unchanged from previous submission. | 882.4560 - Stereotaxic Instrument |
| Product Code: | Unchanged from previous submission. | OLO |
| Product Class: | Unchanged from previous submission. | II |
| Indicationsfor Use | Unchanged from previous submission. | The 360CAS is intended to be used as a planning and intraoperative guidance system to enable open or percutaneous image guided surgical procedures.The 360CAS is indicated for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified.The 360CAS Knee is indicated for the following surgical procedures:Any form of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)For conditions of the knee joint in which the use of computer assisted surgery may be appropriate |
| Anatomy | Unchanged from previous submission. | Knee |
| Patient Population | Unchanged from previous submission. | Patients with medical conditions where use of |
| Characteristic | 360CAS Knee(Subject Device) | 360CAS Knee(Predicate Device) |
| computer-assisted surgerymay be appropriate. | ||
| End-Users | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Trained orthopaedic surgeonand system operators |
| ClinicalWorkflow | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Clinical workflow testingverifying that all systemcomponents are compatible.Complete total kneearthroplasty procedures aresimulated using Sawbonesmimicking the patient'sanatomy and cadaverlaboratory. |
| Main SystemComponents | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Computer PlatformNavigation Cart360CAS Navigation Software- 360CAS KneeSurgical InstrumentsSpatial Tracking Components |
| EnergySource | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Computer - AC Power |
| TrackingTechnology | Passive Optical trackingtechnologyRetroreflective markersplaced in a specifiedconfiguration. | Passive optical trackingtechnology. |
| ImageDisplay | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Monitor |
| SystemAccuracy | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | The system enables thedetermination of themechanical axes of the lowerlimb as well as cut andcomponent alignment with amean translational error of < |
| Characteristic | 360CAS Knee(Subject Device) | 360CAS Knee(Predicate Device) |
| $\pm$ 2 mm and a mean rotationalerror of $< \pm$ 1°. | ||
| Software | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | 360CAS Navigation Software- 360CAS Knee |
| Patient /InstrumentTrackers | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Patient/Instrument Trackers• Femur Tracker• Tibia Tracker• Resection Guide ToolPointer• Pointer |
| PatientTrackerFixation | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Bone Fixator |
| NavigatedManualInstruments | • Resection Guide Tool• Cut block | • Resection Guide Tool |
pg. 6
{9}------------------------------------------------
{10}------------------------------------------------
{11}------------------------------------------------
Substantial Equivalence Rationale - 360CAS Hip
The 360CAS Hip is considered substantially equivalent to the previously cleared 360CAS Hip regarding clinical, technical and biological characteristics. The 360CAS Hip and the previously cleared 360CAS Hip are both intended to be used as planning and intraoperative quidance systems to enable open and percutaneous surgical procedures. Both systems are indicated for hip conditions where the use of CAS is appropriate (e.g., THA) and reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified. The 360CAS Hip and the previously cleared 360CAS Hip are
{12}------------------------------------------------
intended to be used by trained orthopaedic surgeons and operators in an equivalent fashion, following equivalent registration and navigation workflows. Both systems comprise equivalent components (computer platform, navigation software, instruments, tracking components) to achieve the same purpose. The 360CAS Hip and the previously cleared 360CAS Hip both require AC power to power the computer, monitor and camera. Both systems use optical tracking technology where a tracker is sensed by a camera to compute spatial information. Surgical navigation in both systems is enabled through the same software platform developed by Kico Knee Innovation Company Pty Limited. The 360CAS Hip and the previously cleared 360CAS Hip are measuring devices with accuracy of mean translational error of <±2 mm and mean rotational error of <±1°. Therefore, it is concluded that the 360CAS Hip is substantially equivalent to the previously cleared 360CAS Hip.
| Characteristic | 360CAS Hip(Subject device) | 360CAS Hip(Predicate device) |
|---|---|---|
| Trade Name: | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | 360CAS Hip |
| 510(k)Submitter: | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Kico Knee Innovation CompanyPty Limited |
| 510(k)Number: | Under Review | K213380 |
| RegulationNumber: | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | 882.4560 - StereotaxicInstrument |
| Product Code: | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | OLO |
| Product Class: | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | II |
| Indicationsfor Use | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | The 360CAS is intended to beused as a planning andintraoperative guidance systemto enable open or percutaneousimage guided surgicalprocedures.The 360CAS is indicated forpatients undergoing orthopaedic |
| Characteristic | 360CAS Hip(Subject device) | 360CAS Hip(Predicate device) |
| surgery and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified.The 360CAS Hip is indicated for the following surgical procedures:Any form of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) e.g., open or minimally invasive, where a posterior or anterior approach is usedFor conditions of the hip joint in which the use of computer assisted surgery may be appropriate | ||
| Anatomy | Unchanged from previous submission. | Hip |
| PatientPopulation | Unchanged from previous submission. | Patients with conditions of the hip-joint where use of computer-assisted surgery may be appropriate. |
| End-Users | Unchanged from previous submission. | Trained orthopaedic surgeons and system operators |
| ClinicalWorkflow | Unchanged from previous submission. | Clinical workflow testing verifying that all system components are compatible. Complete total hip arthroplasty procedures are simulated using Sawbones mimicking the patient's anatomy and cadaver laboratory. |
| Main Systemcomponents | Unchanged from previous submission. | Computer PlatformNavigation Cart360CAS Navigation Software |
| Characteristic | 360CAS Hip(Subject device) | 360CAS Hip(Predicate device) |
| 360CAS Hip Surgical Instruments Spatial Tracking Components | ||
| EnergySource | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Computer - AC Power |
| TrackingTechnology | Passive Optical trackingtechnologyRetroreflective markers placedin a specified configuration. | Passive optical trackingtechnology. |
| ImageDisplay | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Monitor |
| SystemAccuracy | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | The system enables thedetermination of the mechanicalaxes of the lower limb as well ascut and component alignmentwith a mean translational errorof < ±2 mm and a meanrotational error of < ±1°. |
| Software | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | 360CAS Navigation Software• 360CAS Hip |
| Patient /InstrumentTrackers | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Patient/Instrument Trackers Pelvis Tracker Femur Tracker Tracker Universal Grip Pointer Pointer |
| PatientTrackerFixation | Unchanged from previoussubmission. | Bone Fixator |
{13}------------------------------------------------
{14}------------------------------------------------
{15}------------------------------------------------
Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
Based on the comparison of intended use and technological characteristics, each of the 360CAS Knee and 360CAS Hip are similar to the previous 360CAS Knee and 360CAS Hip predicate devices. The hardware and software verification and validation testing demonstrate that the subject devices meet their performance specifications and will perform as intended in the specified use conditions and that any differences between the subject devices and predicate devices do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness. Therefore, the subject devices, 360CAS Knee and 360CAS Hip, can be found substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
§ 882.4560 Stereotaxic instrument.
(a)
Identification. A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).