K Number
K222847
Date Cleared
2023-05-04

(225 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.5470
Panel
Dental
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Ceramic Brackets Orthometric are intended for use in orthodontic treatment. The brackets are affixed to teeth so that pressure can be exerted on the teeth.

Device Description

The Orthometric's Ceramic Brackets are composed of different designs of brackets that are made of Aluminum Oxide. The ceramic brackets are ICERAM, ICERAM-P, and ICE CLEAR.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for "Ceramic Brackets Orthometric". It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than defining and proving acceptance criteria for a new AI/ML device. Therefore, the requested information elements related to AI/ML device performance, such as sample sizes for test and training sets, number of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and how ground truth was established, are not applicable or available in this document.

However, I can extract information related to the performance tests conducted to demonstrate equivalence for this non-AI medical device.

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document does not explicitly state numerical acceptance criteria in a table format. Instead, it describes performance tests carried out to prove the technical equivalence to the predicate device. The comparison table (Table 5.1) focuses on equivalence of characteristics rather than specific performance metrics and acceptance thresholds.

Based on the text: "Performance tests were carried out to prove the technical equivalence between the Orthometric's Ceramic Brackets and the predicate Clarity Advanced Ceramic Brackets (K102803)."

And the findings:

  • "The data demonstrates the similarity of the dimensional characteristics when compared."
  • "The results of adhesion strength tests demonstrate that both products had similar behavior, showing equivalence, both in the measurement of the external force necessary for detachment and in the shear stress."
  • "The Orthometric's Ceramic Brackets demonstrated similarity in the friction resistance test."

A summary table for performance could be constructed as follows, with the understanding that "acceptance criteria" here is implicitly "demonstrate similarity/equivalence to the predicate":

Performance CharacteristicAcceptance Criteria (Implicit)Reported Device Performance (Orthometric Ceramic Brackets)
Dimensional CharacteristicsDemonstrate similarity to predicateData demonstrates similarity when compared to predicate.
Adhesion StrengthDemonstrate similar behavior to predicateSimilar behavior to predicate in external force for detachment and shear stress.
Friction ResistanceDemonstrate similarity to predicateDemonstrated similarity in the friction resistance test compared to predicate.
BiocompatibilityMeet applicable requirement of ISO 10993Meets the applicable requirement of ISO 10993.

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance

The document does not specify the exact sample sizes used for the performance tests (dimensional characteristics, adhesion strength, friction resistance). It also does not mention data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) for these non-clinical engineering tests.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device requiring expert-established ground truth for a test set. This document describes material and mechanical property equivalence.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device requiring adjudication.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML medical device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML medical device.

7. The type of ground truth used

Not applicable in the context of expert-derived ground truth for an AI/ML device. For this device, "ground truth" would refer to established physical and material properties (e.g., actual dimensions measured by instruments, measured forces, biological reactions to materials as per ISO standards).

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health and Human Services logo. To the right of that is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.

May 4, 2023

Orthometric - Industria e Comercio de Produtos Medicos % Tatiana Botura Regulatory Affairs Specialist PR Servicos Regulatorios Administrativos Ltda Rua Alice Aem Saadi, 855/ 2402 Ribeirao Preto, SP 14096570 Brazil

Re: K222847

Trade/Device Name: Ceramic Brackets Orthometric Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5470 Regulation Name: Orthodontic Plastic Bracket Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NJM Dated: February 2, 2023 Received: February 3, 2023

Dear Tatiana Botura:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's

{1}------------------------------------------------

requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Bobak Shirmohammadi -S

For Michael E. Adjodha, M. ChE., CQIA Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120

Expiration Date: 06/30/2023

See PRA Statement below.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known)

K222847

Device Name Ceramic Brackets Orthometric

Indications for Use (Describe)

Ceramic Brackets Orthometric are intended for use in orthodontic treatment. The brackets are affixed to teeth so that pressure can be exerted on the teeth.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the
time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete
and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services

Food and Drug Administration

Office of Chief Information Officer

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff

PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

510 (K) Summary

K222847

ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION

SponsorOrthometric – Indústria e Comércio de produtosmédicos e odontológicos LTDARua Irineu Martins, 280 – Distrito de Lacio –Marília, SP – Brazil
Contact Person and PreparerTatiana Jabor Botura and Bruno MilhociRegulatory Affairs SpecialistPassarini Regulatory AffairsE-mail: tatiana@passarini.com.brTelephone + 55 (16) 3421 8488
Date Prepared04/13/2023

DEVICE NAME AND CLASSIFICATION

Trade NameCeramic Brackets Orthometric
Common NameOrthodontic Ceramic Brackets
Regulation Number21 CFR 872.5470
Regulatory ClassII
Product CodeNJM
Classification PanelDental
PREDICATE DEVICE INFORMATION
Predicate DeviceK102803 – ClarityTM Advanced Ceramic Brackets
3M Unitek Corp (Primary predicate)

{4}------------------------------------------------

Indications for use:

Ceramic Brackets Orthometric are intended for use in orthodontic treatment. The brackets are affixed to teeth so that pressure can be exerted on the teeth.

Subject Device Description

The Orthometric's Ceramic Brackets are composed of different designs of brackets that are made of Aluminum Oxide. The ceramic brackets are ICERAM, ICERAM-P, and ICE CLEAR.

Substantial Equivalence

As is shown in the equivalence comparison between the subject device and predicate devices, they are equivalent in the product code, regulation number, and common name. The subject and predicate device have the same indications for use. All of them are indicated for the orthodontic movement of teeth. It is used temporarily and is removed after orthodontic treatment has been completed. The subject device and the predicate K102803 have a color identification system indicating along the axis line a color ink dot. As well as the predicate, the subject device is delivered non-sterile to the end user and is intended to be used once by a single patient.

Like its predicate, the subject devices are manufactured from Aluminum Oxide (ceramic) material, which has a well-documented history of biocompatibility within the oral environment, meeting de requirement of ISO 10993. The subject device is equivalent to the predicate in Polycrystalline material composition.

The subject device and its predicate device incorporate equivalent torques, angulations, and slot sizes. Furthermore, the subject device and the K102803 have bases designed to provide maximum adhesion to the tooth while allowing easy and complete removal when necessary. Ceramic Brackets Orthometric and Clarity Advanced (K102803) have a ceramic bracket body with rounded contours and a low profile, twin design, providing more efficient movement mechanics with reduced friction.

As well as the Clarity Advanced, the subject device has different prescriptions, with and without hooks.

510(k) Summary

{5}------------------------------------------------

Performance tests were carried out to prove the technical equivalence between the Orthometric's Ceramic Brackets and the predicate Clarity Advanced Ceramic Brackets (K102803). The data demonstrates the similarity of the dimensional characteristics when compared. The results of adhesion strength tests demonstrate that both products had similar behavior, showing equivalence, both in the measurement of the external force necessary for detachment and in the shear stress. The Orthometric's Ceramic Brackets demonstrated similarity in the friction resistance test.

Subject DevicePrimary Predicate device
ContentsCeramic BracketsOrthometricOrthometric Indústria eComércio de ProdutosMédicos eOdontológicos LTDAClarity™ AdvancedCeramic Brackets –K1028033M Unitek CorpEquivalentDiscussion
Product codeNJMNJMEquivalent
Common NameOrthodontic CeramicBracketsOrthodontic CeramicBracketsEquivalent
RegulationNumber21 CFR 872.547021 CFR 872.5470Equivalent
Indications foruseCeramic BracketsOrthometric areintended for use inorthodontic treatment.The brackets are affixedto teeth so that pressurecan be exerted on theteeth.Clarity™ AdvancedCerâmicas Brackets areintended for use inorthodontic treatment.The brackets are affixed toteeth so that pressure canbe exerted on the teeth.Equivalent
TargetPopulationPatients in need of teethalignment correctionPatients in need of teethalignment correctionEquivalent
Single-useYESYESEquivalent
Non-sterileYESYESEquivalent
MaterialAluminum OxideAluminum OxideEquivalent
BiocompatibilityMeets the applicablerequirement of ISO10993Meets the applicablerequirement of ISO 10993Equivalent
MaxillaryAngulation0 to 110 to 11Equivalent
MaxillaryTorque (°)-22 to 18-22 to 22Equivalent
Slot Size0.022''0.022''Equivalent
Bracket DesignDifferent prescriptions,with and without hooks;Different prescriptions,with and without hooks;Equivalent
IndicationSystemColored-dotColored-dotEquivalent

Table 5.1: Substantial equivalence comparison

{6}------------------------------------------------

Non-Clinical Performance Data:

Ceramic Brackets Orthometric was tested following these standards:

  • ISO 27020:2010 Dentistry – Brackets and tubes for use in Orthodontics;
  • ISO 10993-1:2020 Biological evaluation of medical devices Evaluation and testing within a risk management process;
  • . ISO 10993-5:2009- Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity;
  • . ISO 10993-10:2010 -Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization;
  • . ISO 10993-23:2021 – Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 23: Tests for irritation;

Clinical performance Data:

No clinical data were included in this submission.

Conclusion:

The documentation submitted in this premarket notification demonstrates that the Ceramic Brackets have comparable features and performance and, therefore, are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.

§ 872.5470 Orthodontic plastic bracket.

(a)
Identification. An orthodontic plastic bracket is a plastic device intended to be bonded to a tooth to apply pressure to a tooth from a flexible orthodontic wire to alter its position.(b)
Classification. Class II.