(84 days)
The VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator is indicated for use in procedures where access to the left atrium via the transseptal technique is desired
The subject device is comprised of the following components, which are single-use and supplied sterile to the user:
- One Dilator
- One J-tipped Guidewire
The subject VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator represents modifications made to the legally marketed ExpanSure™ Large Access Transseptal Dilator (K201288) (comprising a dilator and J-tipped Guidewire).
The VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator is designed for safe and easy catheterization and angiography of specific heart chambers and locations. The dilator provides torque control and is flexible. The dilator features a tapered tip and a shaft that can be reshaped manually. The echogenic shaft and tip and radiopaque tip maximize visualization of the dilator during manipulation.
The dilator can be used with separately cleared compatible introducer/access sheaths such as WATCHMAN™ Access sheaths. The dilator provides support and helps guide separately cleared compatible transseptal wires to the atrial septum for puncture. The dilator subsequently dilates the atrial septal defect to enable larger diameter devices to cross the septum.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called the VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator. It describes the device's characteristics, its comparison to a predicate device, and the non-clinical performance testing conducted to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly list quantitative acceptance criteria in a table format alongside specific device performance values. Instead, it states that the device "met all test requirements as specified by applicable standards and test protocols" for various tests. The acceptance criteria are implicitly defined by compliance with specified ISO standards and "Baylis self-enforced requirements."
A summary based on the provided text would look like this:
| Test Category | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Testing | Compliance with ISO 11070:2014/Amd.1:2018 and Baylis self-enforced requirements for specific mechanical properties. | Met all test requirements. |
| Torque Transmission | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Torque Withstand | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Hub-Shaft Tensile | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Flexural Rigidity | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Shapeability | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Curve Retention | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Tip to Tip Cap Cantilever and Tensile | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Clamshell Tensile | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Clamshell Cantilever | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| General Physical Testing | Compliance with ISO 11070:2014/Amd.1:2018, ISO 80369-7, and Baylis self-enforced requirements. | Met all test requirements. |
| Luer Tests | (Defined by standards/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Air and Liquid Leakage Tests | (Defined by standards/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Corrosion Test | (Defined by standard/internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| System Verification Testing | Compliance with Baylis self-enforced requirements for compatibility and snap force. | Met all test requirements. |
| Compatibility Test | (Defined by internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Snap Force Test | (Defined by internal protocol) | Met all test requirements. |
| Biocompatibility Verification | Compliance with ISO 10993-1:2020 and September 4, 2020 FDA guidance document. | Performed through adoption of biological data from predicate and reference devices. |
| Sterilization Verification | Compliance with ISO 11135:2014 and ISO 10993-7:2008/Cor.1:2009; SAL of 10-6. | Met all test requirements. Sterilization with Ethylene Oxide achieved SAL of 10-6. |
| Pyrogen Testing | Compliance with ANSI/AAMI ST72:2011/(R)2016 and FDA guidance, meeting FDA and USP pyrogen limit specifications. | Met current FDA and USP pyrogen limit specifications. |
| Packaging Verification | Compliance with ISO 11607-1:2020 for integrity, seal strength, and sterile barrier integrity over shelf life. | Met all test requirements over proposed intended shelf life. |
| Benchtop Validation | Compliance with 11070:2014/Amd.1:2018 and Baylis self-enforced requirements for performance during intended use. | Met all test requirements. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document does not specify the sample sizes used for any of the non-clinical performance tests (mechanical, physical, system verification, biocompatibility, sterilization, pyrogen, packaging, benchtop).
The data provenance is from non-clinical performance testing conducted by Baylis Medical Company Inc. It is not patient or human data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This question is not applicable to this document. The studies described are non-clinical performance tests on the device itself, not studies involving human interpretation or clinical data where "ground truth" would be established by medical experts for diagnostic or treatment purposes.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This question is not applicable. Adjudication methods are typically employed in clinical studies involving human assessments (e.g., radiology reads) to resolve discrepancies among experts. The studies here are objective engineering and laboratory tests.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This question is not applicable. The document describes the 510(k) submission for a physical medical device (Transseptal Dilator), not an AI/software device that assists human readers with interpretation. No MRMC study was conducted or mentioned.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This question is not applicable. The device is a physical dilator, not an algorithm or AI system.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
This question is not applicable in the sense of clinical "ground truth." For the non-clinical tests, the "ground truth" is established by the specified ISO standards and internal Baylis requirements/protocols, which define the expected performance characteristics of the device.
8. The sample size for the training set
This question is not applicable. There is no "training set" as this is a physical medical device, not an AI or machine learning model.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This question is not applicable. As there is no training set for an AI model, the concept of establishing ground truth for it does not apply.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
May 9, 2022
Baylis Medical Company Inc. May Tsai Director of Regulatory Affairs 5825 Explorer Dr. Mississauga, Ontario L4W 5P6 Canada
Re: K220414
Trade/Device Name: VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1310 Regulation Name: Vessel Dilator For Percutaneous Catheterization Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DRE Dated: April 11, 2022 Received: April 13, 2022
Dear May Tsai:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Rachel Neubrander Assistant Director DHT2B: Division of Circulatory Support, Structural and Vascular Devices OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K220414
Device Name
VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator
Indications for Use (Describe)
The VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator is indicated for use in procedures where access to the left atrium via the transseptal technique is desired
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- | -- |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
13. 510(K) SUMMARY (K220414)
Submitter Information
| A. Company Name: | Baylis Medical Company Inc. |
|---|---|
| B. Company Address: | 5825 Explorer DriveMississauga, Ontario L4W 5P6Canada |
| C. Company Phone: | (905) 602-4875 |
| D. Contact Person: | May TsaiDirector, Regulatory Affairs |
| E. Date Summary Prepared: | 21-April-2022 |
Device Identification
| A. Device Trade Name: | VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator |
|---|---|
| B. Device Common Name: | Dilator, Vessel, For Percutaneous Catheterization |
| C. Classification Name: | CFR, 870.1310 - Dilator, Vessel, ForPercutaneous Catheterization |
| D. Product Code: | DRE |
| E. Device Class: | Class II |
Identification of Legally Marketed Device
| Predicate Device | Manufacturer | 510(k) | Indications for Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| ExpanSure™ LargeAccess TransseptalDilator | Baylis MedicalCompany Inc. | K201288 | The ExpanSure Large AccessTransseptal Dilator is indicated foruse in procedures where access tothe left atrium via thetransseptal technique is desired. |
Table 13.1: Predicate Device
{4}------------------------------------------------
This 510(k) is also citing the legally marketed VersaCross Transseptal Sheath, dilator component (VCD) (K183655) and Portage System, Portage Knot Pusher component (K161878) as reference devices to support material modifications in the subject device.
Indications for Use
The VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator is indicated for use in procedures where access to the left atrium via the transseptal technique is desired.
Device Description
The subject device is comprised of the following components, which are single-use and supplied sterile to the user:
- One Dilator
- One J-tipped Guidewire
The subject VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator represents modifications made to the legally marketed ExpanSure™ Large Access Transseptal Dilator (K201288) (comprising a dilator and J-tipped Guidewire).
The VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator is designed for safe and easy catheterization and angiography of specific heart chambers and locations. The dilator provides torque control and is flexible. The dilator features a tapered tip and a shaft that can be reshaped manually. The echogenic shaft and tip and radiopaque tip maximize visualization of the dilator during manipulation.
The dilator can be used with separately cleared compatible introducer/access sheaths such as WATCHMAN™ Access sheaths. The dilator provides support and helps guide separately cleared compatible transseptal wires to the atrial septum for puncture. The dilator subsequently dilates the atrial septal defect to enable larger diameter devices to cross the septum. It is used in catheterization procedures primarily by Electrophysiologists and Interventional Cardiologists. Procedures using the devices are performed in fully equipped catheter labs with imaging equipment, including fluoroscopy and echocardiography under sterile technique.
Comparison to Predicate Device
The intended use and indications for use of the of the VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator remains unchanged from the ExpanSure™ Large Access Transseptal Dilator (K201288).
The subject and predicate devices also share the same fundamental scientific technology, including principles of operation and mechanism of action.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Differences in technological characteristics between the subject and predicate devices do not raise new or different questions of safety and effectiveness (Table 13.2). The results of verification and validation testing provide reasonable assurance of substantial equivalence of the VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator with the predicate device.
| Characteristic | Subject Device Compared toPredicate ExpanSure™ LargeAccess TransseptalDilator (K201288) |
|---|---|
| Intended Use | Identical |
| Indications for Use | Identical |
| Fundamental scientific technology | Identical |
| Operating principles | Identical |
| Mechanism of action | Identical |
| Technological characteristics(Materials, dimensions, design) | Similar |
| Packaging configuration | Identical |
| Sterilization method | Identical |
Table 13.2: Comparison of Subject and Predicate Device
Performance Testing
Non-clinical performance testing was completed for the subject device to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness for its intended use and to support substantial equivalence to the predicate device. The followinq verification and validation activities were completed to support the device modifications:
Mechanical Testing
Mechanical verification was conducted for the subject device to verify with the compliance ISO 11070:2014/Amd.1:2018 and Baylis self-enforced requirements. The following mechanical tests were performed:
- Torque Transmission
- Torque Withstand
- . Hub-Shaft Tensile
- Flexural Rigidity
- . Shapeability
- Curve Retention .
- Tip to Tip Cap Cantilever and Tensile .
- Clamshell Tensile ●
- . Clamshell Cantilever
{6}------------------------------------------------
General Physical Testing
General physical verification was conducted for the subject device to verify compliance with the applicable requirements of ISO 11070:2014/Amd.1:2018, ISO 80369-7, and Baylis self-enforced requirements. The following general physical tests were performed:
- . Luer Tests
- Air and Liquid Leakage Tests •
- . Corrosion Test
System Verification Testing
System verification tests were conducted for the subject device to verify the compatibility with compatible quidewires, introducer and accessory sheaths as well as to verify the force required to snap and unsnap the subject device and the compatible accessory sheath based on Baylis selfenforced requirements.
- . Compatibility Test
- Snap Force Test
Biocompatibility Verification
Biological safety was evaluated for the subject device to verify compliance with the current applicable requirements of ISO 10993-1:2020 and the September 4, 2020 FDA quidance document, Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process." Biocompatibility verification of the subject device was performed through adoption of biological data from Baylis Medical Company Inc.'s legally marketed devices; the predicate device ExpanSure Large Access Transseptal Dilator (K201288), reference devices VersaCross® Transseptal Sheath, dilator component (VCD) (K183655) and Portage Knot Pusher (component of legally marketed Portage System (K161878)).
Sterilization Verification
Sterilization and residual limit verification were evaluated for the subject device to verify compliance with the current applicable requirements of ISO 11135:2014 and ISO 10993-7:2008/Cor.1:2009. Sterilization was performed with Ethylene Oxide to a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6.
Pyrogen Testing
The subject device is supplied non-pyrogenic. Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) testing was evaluated using the Kinetic Chromogenic method, as per ANSI/AAMI ST72:2011/(R)2016 and the FDA guidance document, "Guidance for Industry – Pyrogens and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and
{7}------------------------------------------------
Answers," to verify the subject device meets current FDA and USP pyrogen limit specifications.
Packaging Verification
Ship testing was evaluated to verify the integrity of the subject device packaging through the rigors of shipping and handling as well as storage over time. The seal strength and sterile barrier integrity was also evaluated to verify compliance with the current applicable requirements of ISO 11607-1:2020 over the proposed intended shelf life of the subject device.
Benchtop Validation
Customer requirements were validated through benchtop validation activities. Benchtop validation testing was performed to validate the performance of the subject device during normal intended use as per current applicable requirements of 11070:2014/Amd.1:2018 and Baylis self-enforced requirements.
The VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator met all test requirements as specified by applicable standards and test protocols. The verification and validation activities demonstrated the subject device meets its intended use and is as safe, as effective, and performs in a manner that is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Conclusions
The subject and predicate devices share the same indications for use, intended use, and fundamental scientific technology, including principles of operation and mechanism of action. Differences in technological characteristics between the subject and predicate devices do not raise new or different questions of safety and effectiveness. The results of verification and validation activities support substantial equivalence of the VersaCross Connect™ Transseptal Dilator to the predicate device.
§ 870.1340 Catheter introducer.
(a)
Identification. A catheter introducer is a sheath used to facilitate placing a catheter through the skin into a vein or artery.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).