(30 days)
The Endoskeleton™ TA Interbody System devices including those with macro-, micro- and nano-roughened surface textured features are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD, defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis, and/or spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1 whose condition requires the use of interbody fusion. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment with the devices. The Endoskeleton™ TA Interbody System implants can also be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with multilevel degenerative scolosis and sagittal deformity. The device is to be used with supplemental fixation cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s).
Endoskeleton™ TA Interbody System is indicated to be used with autograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof.
The Endoskeleton™ TAS Interbody System device including those with macro-, micro- and nano-roughened surface textured features are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD, defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiosraphic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis, and/or spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1 whose condition requires the use of interbody fusion. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment with the devices. The device is a standalone system intended to be used with the bone screws provided and requires no additional supplementary fixation. The Endoskeleton™ TAS Interbody System implants can also be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with multilevel degenerative scoliosis and sagittal deformity. However, when used in these patients at multiple levels and for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis at one or two adjacent levels, the Endoskeleton™ TAS Interbody System must be used with a supplemental internal spinal fixation system (e.g., pedicle screw system) cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine in addition to the integrated screws. The device is indicated to be used with autograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof.
The Endoskeleton™ TAS Hyperlordotic Interbody System (>16°) devices including those with macro-, micro- and nanoroughened surface textured features are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with DDD, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and/or spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1 whose condition requires the use of interbody fusion. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved levels. Implants can also be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with multilevel degenerative scoliosis and sagittal deformity. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment with the devices. The device is indicated to be used with autograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof. The Endoskeleton™ TAS Hyperlordotic Interbody System must be used with a posterior supplemental internal spinal fixation cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine.
The Endoskeleton™ TC Interbody System devices including those with macro-, micro- and nano-roughened surface textured features are indicated for use for anterior cervical interbody fusion in skeletally mature patients with cervical disc degeneration and/or cervical spinal instability, as confirmed by imaging studies (radiographs, CT, MRI), that results in radiculopathy, myelopathy, and/or pain at multiple contiguous levels from C2 to T1. The Endoskeleton™ TC Interbody System is indicated to be used with supplemental fixation cleared by the FDA for use in the cervical spine and autograft bone, allograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof.
The Endoskeleton™ TCS Interbody System devices including those with macro-, micro- and nano-roughened surface textured features are intended for use for anterior cervical interbody fusion in skeletally mature patients with cervical disc degeneration and/or instability, as confirmed by imaging studies(tadiographs, CT, MRI), that results in radiculopathy, myelopathy, and/or pain at multiple contiguous levels from C2 to T1. The device is indicated to be used with autograft bone, allograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof. The device is a stand-alone system when used with Endosketon™ TCS Interbody System integrated screws. When used without the integrated screws, the Endoskeleton™ TCS Interbody System requires additional supplemental fixation cleared by the FDA for the cervical spine.
The Endoskeleton™ TL Hyperlordotic Interbody System (≥16) devices with macro-, micro- and nano-roughened surface textured features are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD, defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis, and/or spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1 whose condition requires the use of interbody fusion. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved levels. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment with the Endoskeleton™ TL Hyperlordotic Interbody System. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved levels may be treated with the device. The Endoskeleton™ TL Hyperloric Interbody System implants can also be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with multilevel degenerative scoliosis and sagittal deformity. The Interbody Device is indicated to be used with autograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof. The Endoskeleton™ TL Hyperlordotic Interbody System must be used with an integrated lateral plate and additionally must be used with posterior supplemental internal spinal fixation cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine.
The Endoskeleton™ TL Interbody System devices including those with macro-, micro- and nano-roughened surface textured features are indicated for use in spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD, defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis, and/or spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1 whose condition requires the use of interbody fusion. Patients should have received 6 months of non- operative treatment with the devices. The device must be used with supplemental fixation cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved levels. The Endoskeleton™ TL Interbody System implants can also be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with multilevel degenerative scoliosis and sagittal deformity. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved levels may be treated with the device. It is indicated to be used with autograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof.
The Endoskeleton™ TO Interbody System devices including those with macro-, micro- and nano-roughened surface textured features are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD, defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis, and/or spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1 whose condition requires the use of interbody fusion. Patients should have received 6 months of nonoperative treatment with the devices. The device must be used with supplemental fixation cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. The Endosketon™ TO Interbody System implants can also be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with multilevel degenerative scoliosis and sagittal deformity. The device is indicated to be used with autograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof.
The Endoskeleton™ TT Interbody System devices including those with macro-, micro- and nano-roughened surface textured features are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD, defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis, and/or spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1 whose condition requires the use of interbody fusion. Patients should have received 6 months of nonoperative treatment with the devices. The device must be used with supplemental fixation cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine. These patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. The Endoskeleton™ TT Interbody System implants can also be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with multilevel degenerative scoliosis and sagittal deformity. It is indicated to be used with autograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof.
The Endoskeleton™ Interbody System implants are available in a variety of sizes and designed with a large hollow region in the center to house autograft bone, allograft bone comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone, demineralized allograft with bone marrow aspirate, or a combination thereof. The design incorporates "windows" through the implant to permit visualization of the graft material and, over time, formation of new bone. Devices incorporate Titan Surface Technologies™, where superior and inferior surfaces include either Chemtex™ or nanoLOCK™ surface treatment (MMN™) designed to improve fixation to adjacent bone. nanoLOCK™ surface technology (MMN™) provides a microscopic roughened surface with nanoscale features. The nanoLOCK™ Surface Technology is specifically engineered to have nano textured features at a nanometer (10°) level, which have demonstrated the ability to elicit an endogenous cellular and biochemical response attributed to these nanotextured features in vitro. The nanoLOCK™ surface technology demonstrates the elements to be considered a nanotechnology as outlined in the FDA nanotechnology guidance document. New bone formation through the implant is intended to provide long-term structural support and fusion at the implanted disc space. Implants are composed of ASTM F136 Ti 6Al-4V ELI titanium alloy and are provided either sterile or non-sterile. The Endoskeleton™ TL Hyp. implants are composed of ASTM F3001 Ti 6Al-4V ELI titanium alloy and are provided sterile.
The Endoskeleton™ TAS & TAS Hyp. and Endoskeleton™ TCS Interbody systems include integrated fixation screws for stabilizing the implants when placed in the interbody space. Screws are composed of ASTM F136 Ti 6Al-4V ELI titanium alloy and are provided either sterile or nonsterile.
This document is a 510(k) premarket notification from the FDA for a medical device called the Endoskeleton™ Interbody System. It's a clearance letter, not a study report. Therefore, it does not contain the detailed acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the way you've outlined.
The FDA 510(k) process is primarily focused on demonstrating "substantial equivalence" to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than proving safety and effectiveness through new clinical trials against predefined acceptance criteria like a PMA (Premarket Approval) application would.
Here's what can be extracted from the document based on your request, and where information is inherently missing due to the nature of a 510(k) clearance:
1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
This information is not provided in the document. The document states "no new mechanical testing was required for this Submission" because "There is no change to the Endoskeleton™ Interbody System product families' design, manufacturing, materials, nor intended use." This implies that performance has been demonstrated through substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than new testing against defined criteria for this specific submission.
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
No new test set or data provenance is detailed. The substantial equivalence argument relies on the prior clearance of predicate devices.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):
This information is not applicable/provided as no new test set requiring expert ground truth establishment is described.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
This information is not applicable/provided.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
This information is not applicable/provided. The device is an intervertebral body fusion system, not an AI diagnostic tool.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:
This information is not applicable/provided. This is a physical implant device, not a standalone algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):
This information is not applicable/provided for this 510(k). The regulatory clearance is based on substantial equivalence to predicate devices, which would have had their own "ground truth" (e.g., clinical outcomes, mechanical testing) established during their initial approval/clearance.
8. The sample size for the training set:
This information is not applicable/provided as this is a physical medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
This information is not applicable/provided as this is a physical medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm.
Summary of what the document does provide regarding performance and equivalence:
-
Mechanical Testing: According to the document, "no new mechanical testing was required for this Submission" because there were no changes to the product families' design, manufacturing, materials, or intended use. This means its mechanical performance is considered substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
-
Biocompatibility: The implants are made from materials (ASTM F136 Ti 6Al-4V ELI titanium alloy and ASTM F3001 Ti 6Al-4V ELI titanium alloy) that have "a long history of safe and effective use identical to predicate devices and biocompatibility testing is not required."
-
Substantial Equivalence: The primary "proof" of meeting acceptance criteria for this 510(k) is the demonstration of substantial equivalence to three predicate devices:
- EIT Cellular Titanium® Cages- K201605 (S.E. 07/15/2020)
- Endoskeleton™ Interbody Systems- K192018 (S.E. 08/13/2019)
- NuVasive Interbody Systems K203201 (S.E. 01/12/2021)
The substantial equivalence is based on having the same intended use, fundamental scientific technology, material, sizing, and sterilization method as the predicate devices. Modifications described include identification of nanoLOCK™ Surface Technology and expansion/modification of indications based on the cleared indications of the predicate devices.
In conclusion, this document is a regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence, not a detailed study report demonstrating performance against specific acceptance criteria for a new device.
§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.
(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.