(448 days)
KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are manually operated instruments indicated for cutting or biting bone during surgery involving the skull or spinal column in patients two years of age or older.
The KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are manual, reusable, stainless-steel instruments. They are provided non-sterile and must be cleaned and sterilized by the end user before use. Validated methods are provided in the instructions for use that accompany each device. The instruments are available coated or uncoated in a variety of styles, with options for a range of cutting angles, shaft lengths and profiles, jaw widths, and handle designs. Additionally, the KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs can have a push button opening mechanism to allow separation of the long shafts allowing for improved cleaning and sterilization.
This document is a 510(k) Summary for the KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs, a manual surgical instrument. It describes the device, its intended use, and the testing performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information provided:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" with numerical targets in the conventional sense for medical device performance. Instead, the performance testing section describes the types of tests conducted and uses phrases like "No corrosion detected," "Smooth cuts achieved, pass," and "Comparable to reference device" as outcomes.
Based on the "Performance Testing - Non-clinical" section, here's a table summarizing the tests and results, which serve as the implicit acceptance criteria and reported performance:
| Test Name | Test Description | Implicit Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Testing | |||
| Autoclave Test | Test to verify corrosion resistance during autoclaving. | No corrosion detected after autoclaving. | No corrosion detected |
| Boiling Test | Test to verify corrosion resistance of instruments. | No corrosion detected after boiling. | No corrosion detected |
| Copper Sulfate Test | Test to verify corrosion resistance of instruments. | No corrosion detected after Copper Sulfate test. | No corrosion detected |
| Thermal Test | Test to verify thermal resistance of instruments. | No corrosion detected after thermal testing. | No corrosion detected |
| Cut Quality | Compare cut quality. | Achieve smooth cuts comparable to the reference device. | Smooth cuts achieved, pass |
| Comparative Functional Testing | |||
| Spring Force | Compare spring force. | Spring force comparable to the reference device. | Comparable to reference device |
| Cut Force | Compare cut force. | Cut force comparable to the reference device. | Comparable to reference device |
| Push Button Force | Compare push button force. | Push button force comparable to the reference device. | Comparable to reference device |
| Biocompatibility Testing | |||
| Biocompatibility | Evaluated in accordance with ISO 10993. | Meet biocompatibility endpoints (chemical characterization, cytotoxicity, sensitization, etc.). | KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are biocompatible. |
| Sterilization Testing | |||
| Steam Sterilization | Validations based on AAMI ANSI ISO 17665-1. | Achieve a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ using biological indicator overkill method. | All test method acceptance criteria were met. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size for Test Set: The document does not specify the exact number of KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs or individual components tested for the non-clinical performance and functional tests. It mentions "Comparative testing was completed versus the reference device," implying a sample of both the subject device and the reference device was used, but quantities are not provided.
- Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin for the data or whether the studies were retrospective or prospective. Given that it's a 510(k) submission for a new device, the performance testing would typically be prospective, conducted by the manufacturer (KLS-Martin L.P. is based in Jacksonville, Florida, USA).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
This type of information is not applicable to this device's performance testing. The KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are mechanical surgical instruments. "Ground truth" established by experts (like radiologists reading images) is relevant for diagnostic AI/software devices. For mechanical devices, performance is assessed through objective physical and chemical tests rather than expert interpretation.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Adjudication methods (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) are typically used in studies involving subjective assessment by multiple readers or experts to resolve discrepancies, particularly in diagnostic contexts. Since the performance testing for these rongeurs involved objective physical and chemical tests, an adjudication method for a "test set" is not applicable.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. MRMC studies are specific to evaluating diagnostic performance, often with AI assistance compared to human-only performance. This device is a manual surgical instrument, not an AI or diagnostic tool.
6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study Was Done
No, a standalone study was not done. This question is also typically relevant for AI/software devices that can operate without human intervention. The KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are manually operated instruments; they do not have an algorithm or standalone operating mode.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
As elaborated in point 3, the concept of "ground truth" as derived from expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data is not applicable here. The performance data is the ground truth based on objective measurements and observations from the physical and chemical tests (e.g., presence/absence of corrosion, measurement of force, observation of cut quality).
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This device is a mechanical instrument, not an AI/software device that requires a "training set" in the machine learning sense.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable. As stated in point 8, there is no training set for this type of device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue, with the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue as well. The FDA is a federal agency responsible for regulating and supervising the safety of food, drugs, and other products.
June 3, 2022
KLS-Martin L.P. Susan Leander Regulatory Affairs Project Supervisor 11201 Saint Johns Industrial Parkway South Jacksonville, Florida 32246
Re: K210741
Trade/Device Name: KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4840 Regulation Name: Manual Rongeur Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HAE Dated: May 2, 2022 Received: May 3, 2022
Dear Susan Leander:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Adam D. Pierce, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K210741
Device Name KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs
Indications for Use (Describe)
KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are manually operated instruments indicated for cutting or biting bone during surgery involving the skull or spinal column in patients two years of age or older.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
| 510(k) Summary K210741 | |
|---|---|
| Submitter: | KLS-Martin L.P. 11201 Saint Johns Industrial Pkwy S Jacksonville, FL 32246 |
| Contact Person: | Susan Leander Regulatory Affairs Project Supervisor Phone: 800-625-1557 Email: susan.leander@klsmartinusa.com |
| Alternate Correspondent: | Melissa Bachorski Assistant Director, RA/QMS Phone: 800-625-1557 Email: regaffairs@klsmartin.com |
| Date Prepared: | May 31, 2022 |
| Trade Name: | KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs |
| Common Name: | Manual Rongeur |
| Classification Name: | Manual Rongeur (21 CFR 882.4840) |
| Regulatory Class: | II |
| Product Code: | HAE |
| Predicate Device: | K-2 Medical GmbH & Co. KG (K150468) Laminectomy Rongeurs, Kerrison Rongeurs, IVD Rongeurs |
| Reference Device: | INSTRUMED INTERNATIONAL, INC.(K081651) Instrumed Rongeur |
Device Description
The KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are manual, reusable, stainless-steel instruments. They are provided non-sterile and must be cleaned and sterilized by the end user before use. Validated methods are provided in the instructions for use that accompany each device. The instruments are available coated or uncoated in a variety of styles, with options for a range of cutting angles, shaft lengths and profiles, jaw widths, and handle designs. Additionally, the KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs can have a push button opening mechanism to allow separation of the long shafts allowing for improved cleaning and sterilization.
Indications for Use
The KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are manually operated instruments indicated for cutting or biting bone during surgery involving the skull or spinal column in patients two years of age and older.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Technological Characteristics & Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The subject device, KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs, is comparable in materials, design, composition, and function to the predicate device. K150468. The only differences are in some of the options available, such as cutting angles and shaft lengths. The subject device has jaw widths ranging from 1 mm to 6 mm, which is the same as the predicate device. The subject devices have cutting angles that are equivalent to those of the predicate and reference devices. Cutting angles range from 30° to 90° and can angle up or down. The selection of cutting angles allow for greater accessibility to the surgical site. Shaft lengths range from 6 to 15 inches for the predicate device and from 15 to 30 cm (~6 to ~12 inches) for the subject device. Rongeurs are multipurpose instruments that can be used in a variety of applications to cut and bite bone for access to underlying tissue. All of these options are surgeon's preference and do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness of the instruments.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs(K210741) | K2 Medical(K150468)Laminectomy Rongeurs, KerrisonRongeurs, IVD Rongeurs | Medline (Instrumed) Rongeurs(K081651) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject Device | Primary Predicate | Reference Device | |
| Indications for Use | The KLS Martin NeuroRongeurs are manually operatedinstruments indicated for cuttingor biting bone during surgeryinvolving the skull or spinalcolumn in patients two years ofage or older. | Laminectomy Rongeurs, KerrisonRongeurs and IVD Rongeurs aremanually operated instruments indicatedfor cutting or biting bone during surgeryinvolving the skull or spinal column inpatients two years of age or older. | The intended use of Instrumed Rongeuris to access, cut and bite soft tissue andbone during surgery involving the spinalcolumn. |
| Contraindications | No known contraindications | None specified. | None specified. |
| Rx or OTC | Rx | Rx | Rx |
| Single Use orReusable | Reusable | Same | Same |
| Opening mechanism | Push button | Same | Same |
| Classification | 21 CFR 882.4840Class II | 21 CFR 882.4840Class II | 21 CFR 882.4840Class II |
| Product Code | HAE | HAE | HAE |
| Material | Stainless steel1.4021/X20Cr13/AISI 420A1.4305/X8CrNiS18-9/AISI 3031.4310 /X10CrNi18-8/AISI 301TiAlN coating (Solid Black option)Gold plating | Stainless Steel AISI 420 ATitanium acc. ASTM F136/ ISO 5832-3 severalsurface coatings:anthracite, gold, blacksilicone coated handle | Not stated. |
| Cleaning | Must be cleaned following avalidated method before each use | Same | Same |
| KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs(K210741) | K2 Medical(K150468)Laminectomy Rongeurs, KerrisonRongeurs, IVDRongeurs | Medline (Instrumed) Rongeurs(K081651) | |
| Subject Device | Primary Predicate | Reference Device | |
| Sterilization | Non-sterileMust be sterilized following avalidated method before each use | Same | Same |
| Anatomical Sites | Spine & cranium | Same | Spine |
| Use Environment | Sterile OR | Same | Same |
| User | Professional users: Theinstruments may be used onlyby surgical specialists.Reprocessing must be performedaccordingly by trained and qualifiedpersonnel of the reprocessing unitfor medical devices. | Same | Same |
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
Performance Testing - Non-clinical
Performance Testing
KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs were evaluated for corrosion and heat resistance. Comparative testing was completed versus the reference device, the Medline (Instrumed) Rongeurs (K081651).
Performance Testing
| Test Name | Test Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Autoclave Test | Test to verify corrosion resistanceduring autoclaving. | No corrosion detected |
| Boiling Test | Test to verify corrosionresistance of instruments. | No corrosion detected |
| Copper Sulfate Test | Test to verify corrosionresistance of instruments. | No corrosion detected |
| Thermal Test | Test to verify thermalresistance of instruments. | No corrosion detected |
| Cut Quality | Compare cut quality | Smooth cuts achieved, pass |
Comparative Functional Testing
| Test Name | Test Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Spring Force | Compare spring force | Comparable to reference device |
| Cut Force | Compare cut force | Comparable to reference device |
| Push Button Force | Compare push button force | Comparable to reference device |
Biocompatibility Testing
Biocompatibility endpoints were evaluated in accordance with ISO 10993. Biocompatibility testing for chemical characterization of leachables, cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, material mediated pyrogenicity and hemocompatibility. Test results indicate that the KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are biocompatible.
Sterilization Testing
Steam sterilization validations were performed using the dynamic-air-removal cycle in accordance with AAMI ANSI ISO 17665-1 to a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10° using the biological indicator (BI) overkill method. All test method acceptance criteria were met.
Performance Testing - Clinical
Clinical testing was not necessary for the substantial equivalence determination.
Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are comparable in materials, design, composition, and function to the predicate and reference devices, K150468, K2 Medical Laminectomy Rongeurs, Kerrison Rongeurs, IVD Rongeurs and K081651, Medline (Instrumed) Rongeurs. They have the same intended use, same fundamental principles of operation, and same technological features as the predicate device. The KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
§ 882.4840 Manual rongeur.
(a)
Identification. A manual rongeur is a manually operated instrument used for cutting or biting bone during surgery involving the skull or spinal column.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).