K Number
K203793
Date Cleared
2022-02-14

(413 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
870.1220
Panel
CV
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter can be used in the evaluation of a variety of cardiac arrhythmias from endocardial and intravascular sites.

Device Description

The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter are biocompatible, flexible, radiopaque electrophysiology catheters that are available in a variety of diameters, lengths, curve shapes, and electrode number and spacing configurations, with a high-torque shaft with an array of platinum iridium alloy electrodes at the distal tip that can be used for recording electrical signals. The catheter is designed to facilitate the electrophysiological mapping of the heart.

The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter consist of a handle, a shaft and a steerable diagnostic tip. The catheter is introduced through the sheath and into the femoral vein, from the inferior vena cava into the heart and coronary sinus. The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter are available in 6F in various curves, including B, D, Y, and R curves.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called the "RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter". This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, primarily through bench testing, biocompatibility testing, and comparisons of technical characteristics.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not explicitly list acceptance criteria for each test in a separate column. Instead, for most tests, it states "All test samples met the acceptance criteria," indicating that the criteria were satisfied. The performance results are qualitative; for a few tests, comparative statements are made relative to the reference device.

Here's a compilation of the tests and their reported performance:

TestAcceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
Corrosion ResistanceNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Particulate Matter EvaluationNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria and is equivalent to the Reference Device.
Radiopacity DetectabilityNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Signal AcquisitionNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
UsabilityNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria. The performance of the Subject Device is better or equivalent to the Reference Device.
Electrical SafetyNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Visual Inspection (Bench Testing)Not explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Dimensional VerificationNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Simulated UseNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Connection Plug ForceNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Tip Fatigue ToleranceNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Shaft Fatigue ToleranceNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Flexural Fatigue ToleranceNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Torsional ForceNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Electrode Conductor ResistanceNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria.
Buckling ForceNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria. The buckling force of the Subject Device is less than or equal to the Reference Device.
Peak Tensile ForceNot explicitly stated, implied "met criteria"All test samples met the acceptance criteria. The peak tensile force of the Subject Device was compared to the Reference Device.
Torque StrengthData comparison, not a pass/fail criterionThe average number of 360° rotations when permanent mechanical deformation occurs was recorded for the Subject Device and Reference Device. The torque strength of the Subject device is compared to the Reference Device for reference only.
Packaging Integrity (Distribution Sim.)ASTM D4169-16All test samples met the acceptance criteria per ASTM D4169-16.
Packaging Integrity (Visual Insp.)ASTM F1886/F1886M-16All test samples met the acceptance criteria per ASTM F1886/F1886M-16.
Packaging Integrity (Bubble Leak)ASTM F2096-11All test samples met the acceptance criteria per ASTM F2096-11.
Packaging Integrity (Tray Seal Strength)F88/F88M-15All test samples met the acceptance criteria per F88/F88M-15.
CytotoxicityNon-cytotoxic (ISO 10993-5)Non-cytotoxic
SensitizationNon-sensitizer (ISO 10993-10)Non-sensitizer
Intracutaneous ReactivityNon-irritant (ISO 10993-10)Non-irritant
Acute Systemic ToxicityNon-Toxic (ISO 10993-11)Non-Toxic
Systemic Toxicity (Pyrogenicity)Non-Pyrogenic (ISO 10993-11)Non-Pyrogenic
Hemocompatibility (Hemolysis)Non-Hemolytic (ISO 10993-4)Non-Hemolytic
Hemocompatibility (Thrombogenicity)Passed (ISO 10993-4)Passed
Hemocompatibility (Complement Act.)Non-Activator (ISO 10993-4)Non-Activator
Hemocompatibility (PTT)Passed (ISO 10993-4)Passed
Shelf Life (Accelerated Aging)Meets design specification at 1 yearAll acceptance criteria met; device performs as intended to Design Specification.
Sterilization (SAL)SAL of 10^-6Achieved a SAL of 10^-6.
EO and ECH ResidualsBelow limits specified in ISO 10993-7Below the limits specified in ISO 10993-7.
Bacterial Endotoxin Levels

§ 870.1220 Electrode recording catheter or electrode recording probe.

(a)
Identification. An electrode recording catheter or an electrode recording probe is a device used to detect an intracardiac electrocardiogram, or to detect cardiac output or left-to-right heart shunts. The device may be unipolar or multipolar for electrocardiogram detection, or may be a platinum-tipped catheter which senses the presence of a special indicator for cardiac output or left-to-right heart shunt determinations.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).