K Number
K202850
Date Cleared
2021-02-09

(134 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
870.3300
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil is indicated for arterial and venous embolization in the peripheral vasculature.

Device Description

The Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil is an embolization coil that consists of a platinum embolization coil attached to a composite delivery pusher, and a hand-held Instant Detacher (I.D.) which, when activated, detaches the coil from the delivery pusher tip. The Instant Detacher is an accessory sold separately and was most recently cleared in K162704. The Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil is supplied sterile and is intended for single-use only.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil. This document pertains to a medical device (an embolization coil) and does not describe a study involving an AI/Machine Learning device or a diagnostic device. Therefore, many of the requested categories, such as "Adjudication method," "MRMC comparative effectiveness study," "Standalone performance," "Training set," and "Ground truth for training set," are not applicable to this submission.

The document primarily focuses on demonstrating the substantial equivalence of the new device (Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil) to a legally marketed predicate device (Concerto Detachable Coil System) through a series of bench tests and leveraging existing data from the predicate. The "acceptance criteria" are implicitly the passing results of these non-clinical tests.

Here's the information that can be extracted and how it relates to the request:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The acceptance criteria are generally "Pass" for each test, indicating that the device met the specified performance requirements. The document does not provide specific numerical criteria for each test beyond stating they "meet specification."

Test NameAcceptance Criteria (Implicit)Reported Device Performance
Friction in CatheterMeet specificationPass
Coil Force Transfer RatioMeet specificationPass
Pusher LengthMeet specificationPass
Coil Visual InspectionNo damage, kinks, 1st loop fullPass
Friction in SheathMeet specificationPass
FatigueRe-sheathed/deployed 6+ times without breaking/detachingPass
PP TensileMeet specificationPass
Kink resistanceTrack through 0.027" catheter without kinkingPass
DetachmentMust detach when attemptedPass
Tip BucklingMeet min/max specificationsPass
Tinius OlsenMeet specificationPass
Loop DeformationMeet specificationPass
Anchor Flow RateMeet specificationPass
1st Loop OD MeasurementMeet specification based on sizePass
Flow OcclusionMeet specification in vessel modelPass
Primary Wind OD MeasurementMeet specificationPass
Coil LengthMeet specification based on modelPass
Pusher ElongationMeet specificationPass
Pusher Skive TensileMeet specificationPass
Primary wind weld tensile strengthMeet specificationPass
Couple Tube TensileMeet specificationPass
Shield Coil TensileMeet specificationPass
Detachment (time)Less than 5sPass
Detachment (back-up method)Manually detachable by back-up methodPass
Fiber Amount CountingMeet specification based on modelPass
Fiber Pull Out ForceMeet specificationPass
Distribution SimulationMaintain integrity with packaging through shippingPass

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

  • Sample Size: The document does not explicitly state the specific number of coils or test replicates used for each bench test conducted on the Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil. It states that "A subset of design verification testing was conducted."
  • Data Provenance: The tests were "non-clinical bench testing." The document mentions "clinically relevant tortuosity model of the splenic and gastroduodenal arteries" which implies in-vitro testing. It also states that "GLP acute animal data was also leveraged from the predicate device," indicating some previous animal study data was used, but not for the subject device's new testing.
  • Retrospective or Prospective: The testing performed for this submission would be considered prospective for the subject device, as it was specifically done for this 510(k) submission.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications:

Not applicable. This is a medical device submission based on physical and mechanical performance testing, not a diagnostic device requiring expert interpretation for ground truth.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

Not applicable. No expert adjudication process is described as it's not a diagnostic study.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done:

No, this was not an MRMC comparative effectiveness study. It is a 510(k) submission for a non-diagnostic medical device.

6. If a Standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

Not applicable. This is a medical device, not an algorithm. The performance evaluation is based on mechanical and physical characteristics.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:

The "ground truth" for the non-clinical performance tests is the defined engineering and material specifications for the device. For example, a coil's length must meet a certain specification, or its detachment time must be below a certain threshold. There's no "ground truth" derived from patient outcomes or expert consensus in the typical sense for a diagnostic device. Biocompatibility was evaluated against ISO 10993 standards.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:

Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established:

Not applicable.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, and then the word "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font below.

February 9, 2021

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. d/b/a ev3 Neurovascular Rita De Rama Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 9775 Toledo Way Irvine, California 92618

Re: K202850

Trade/Device Name: Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.3300 Regulation Name: Vascular Embolization Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KRD, Dated: September 25, 2020 Received: September 28, 2020

Dear Rita De Rama:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part

{1}------------------------------------------------

801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Finn Donaldson Assistant Director DHT2C: Division of Coronary and Peripheral Intervention Devices OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K202850

Device Name Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil is indicated for arterial and venous embolization in the peripheral vasculature.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summary K202850

510(k) Owner:Micro Therapeutics, Inc. d/b/a ev3 Neurovascular9775 Toledo WayIrvine, CA 92618Establishment Registration: 2029214
Contact Person(s):Rita De RamaSr. Specialist, Regulatory AffairsTelephone: (949) 383-7061Email: rita.r.derama@medtronic.com
Date SummaryPrepared:February 4, 2021
Trade Name ofDevice:Concerto VersaTM Detachable Coil
Device ClassificationName:Vascular Device for Promoting Embolization
FDA Review Panel:Cardiovascular
Classification ProductCode:KRD
Regulation Number:870.3300
RegulationDescription:Vascular embolization device
Device Classification:Class II
Predicate Device:Concerto Detachable Coil SystemK090046

Device Description

The Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil is an embolization coil that consists of a platinum embolization coil attached to a composite delivery pusher, and a hand-held Instant Detacher (I.D.) which, when activated, detaches the coil from the delivery pusher tip. The Instant Detacher is an accessory sold separately and was most recently cleared in K162704. The Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil is supplied sterile and is intended for single-use only.

Indication for Use Statement

The Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil is indicated for arterial and venous embolization in the peripheral vasculature.

Device Comparison

The Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil is a design modification adding larger sizes, with coil loop diameters of 3-32mm and lengths of 5-65cm. The intention is to expand the Concerto Detachable Coil System family by adding thirty-two new model numbers to the currently cleared Concerto product portfolio (predicate device). These new model numbers are a line extension of the predicate device and come in a 3D platinum configuration enlaced with Nylon fibers. The first

{4}------------------------------------------------

loop of the 3mm - 14mm models are oversized to perform vessel embolization, while the first loop of 16mm - 32mm models are undersized to perform saccular embolization. The subject Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil and the predicate Concerto™ Detachable Coil System have many of the same technological characteristics. A comparison of the subject device and the predicate is provided below.

Technological Characteristics Comparison Table
Design FeaturePredicate Device:Concerto Detachable CoilSystem (K090046)Subject Device:Concerto Versa™Detachable Coil
Indication for Use (IFU)StatementThe Concerto Detachable CoilSystem is indicated for arterial andvenous embolizations in theperipheral vasculature.The Concerto Versa™Detachable Coil is indicated forarterial and venousembolization in the peripheralvasculature.
Dimensions
Device Size RangeConcerto Nylon Helix:2-10mm – Loop OD1-30cm - LengthConcerto PGLA Helix:2 -20mm Loop OD1-50cm - LengthConcerto PGLA 3D:2-18mm Loop OD2-40cm - Length3-32mm Loop OD5-65cm Length
Coil ShapeHelical & 3D3D
Coil Wire OD (inches)2-3mm: 0.0015''4-6mm: 0.0020''7-10mm: 0.00225''12-20mm: 0.00275''3-6mm: 0.0025''7-9mm: 0.00275''10-32mm: 0.0035''
Fiber OD/Length0.001''/2.0mm0.0015''/3.5mm
Distance between two fibers2mmModels CV-3-5 and CV-4-5:≥3mmOther Models: ≥4mm
Delivery System (Pusher)
Delivery SystemPusher: Composite HypotubeStainless Steel with PTFE outerjacket and liner & PET & Pt/Walignment markerSame
Delivery Wire/Pusher Length188cmSame
Technological Characteristics Comparison Table
Design FeaturePredicate Device:Concerto Detachable CoilSystem (K090046)Subject Device:Concerto Versa™Detachable Coil
Delivery Wire/Pusher DistalOD0.0142"Same
Delivery Wire/PusherProximal OD0.0140"0.0200"
Introducer SheathID/OD/LengthID: 0.047cmOD: 0.077cmLength: 120cmID: 0.071cmOD: 0.107cmLength: 130cm
Materials - Permanent Patient Contacting (Implant)
Implant Coil WirePt (92%)/ W (8%)Same
Coil Shell/Cap ShellPt (92%)/ W (8%)Stainless Steel 316L
Stretch Resistant MemberPolypropyleneSame
FiberPGLA or Nylon 6Nylon 6
Detach SubassemblyStainless Steel 316LSame
Accessories/Product Compatibility
Catheter CompatibilityNylon:2mm to 4mm, minimum microcatheter inside diameter is 0.0165"5mm to 10mm, minimum microcatheter inside diameter is 0.021"PGLA:12mm and above, minimum microcatheter inside diameter is 0.021"The Concerto Versa™Detachable Coil should only bedelivered through a deliverycatheter (either micro catheteror diagnostic catheter) with aminimum inner diameter of0.027" and a maximum innerdiameter of 0.041".
Method of Coil DetachmentInstant Detacher - Retraction ofrelease cord from distal orifice ofimplant delivery pusherSame
Sterilization
MethodEthylene Oxide (EO)Same
Stability
Shelf life3 yearsSame
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
CompatibilityMR ConditionalSame

{5}------------------------------------------------

K202850 Page 3 of 6

{6}------------------------------------------------

Biocompatibility

Based on minor changes in the subject device, cytotoxicity testing was conducted on the Concerto Versa ™ Detachable Coil per ISO 10993-5: 2009 and passed. All other biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993-1:2009 was leveraged for the Concerto Versa ™ Detachable Coil, as based on the predicate device described below:

TestTest MethodResults
Biocompatibility
SensitizationISO Guinea Pig Maximization SensitizationTestPass
IrritationISO Intracutaneous Reactivity TestPass
Acute Systemic ToxicityISO Acute Systemic Injection TestPass
PyrogenicityMaterials Mediated PyrogenPass
Sub-Chronic/ Sub-Acute ToxicitySub-Acute /Sub-Chronic ToxicityPass
GenotoxicityBacterial Reverse Mutation (Ames Assay)Pass
In Vitro Mouse LymphomaPass
ImplantationIntramuscular Implantation (13 wk)Pass
Intramuscular Implantation (1 wk)Pass
IntramuscularImplantation (4 wk)Pass
Hemocompatibility
Complement Activation (SC5b-9)Pass
In-Vivo Thrombogenicity Assay (Porcine, 4-hr)Pass
Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT)Pass
Platelet & Leukocyte Count (P&L)Pass
Hemolysis Assay (Direct Contact and ExtractMethod)Pass

Performance Data

Non-clinical bench testing was performed and leveraged to evaluate the performance of the Concerto Versa ™ Detachable Coil. A subset of design verification testing was conducted based on the FDA Guidance for Vascular and Neurovascular Embolization Devices to evaluate the physical and mechanical properties of the subject device and demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate. The following tests were performed shown in the table below, and all passed. Verification and validation testing was performed using a clinically relevant tortuosity model of the splenic and gastroduodenal arteries. All other bench testing was leveraged, as based on the similarities with the predicate device. GLP acute animal data was also leveraged from the predicate device.

Additionally, the following clinically relevant endpoints were addressed as follows:

  • Device migration, occlusion effectiveness and recanalization were evaluated through ● design verification testing with passing results, which are similar to the predicate device.
  • Acute complications were addressed based upon the materials, delivery of the device to the target location and clinical applications which are similar to that of the predicate device.
  • Local foreign-body reaction was addressed through the product specifications requiring the device to be biocompatible per ISO10993-1 and to be provided sterile.

{7}------------------------------------------------

K202850

Page 5 of 6

TestSpecificationResults
Friction in CatheterFriction force shall meet specification when delivered in a clinicallyrelevant model with a catheter.Pass
Coil Force Transfer RatioForce transfer of delivery system and implant meet specificationwhen delivered into a catheter.Pass
Pusher LengthThe delivery system (pusher) length measurement shall meetspecification.Pass
Coil Visual InspectionThe coil shall have no damage and kinks.The 1st loop shall be a full loop.Pass
Friction in SheathFriction force shall meet specification when delivered through asheath.Pass
FatigueThe coil shall be able to be re-sheathed and re-deployed in aclinically relevant model with a catheter 6 times minimum, withoutbreaking or prematurely detaching.Pass
PP TensileStretch resistance tensile strength must meet specification.Pass
Kink resistanceThe distal end of 27cm pusher shall be able to track through a 0.027"catheter that is wrapped around a 3.8mm pin gage without kinking.Pass
DetachmentThe coil must detach when detachment is attempted.Pass
Tip BucklingTip buckling force shall meet minimum and maximumspecifications.Pass
Tinius OlsenThe distal 25cm of the pusher shall meet specification whendeflected 60° in a Tinius-Olsen with a 1/8" span, at roomtemperature.Pass
Loop DeformationThe loop deformation force shall meet specifications.Pass
Anchor Flow RateAnchor flow rate shall meet specifications based on size vesselmodel size and coil size.Pass
1st Loop ODMeasurement1st Loop OD must meet specifications based on size.Pass
Flow OcclusionFor each size coil: The reduction flow of specified coil shall meetspecification in the appropriate vessel model.Pass
Primary Wind ODMeasurementPrimary wind OD shall meet specification.Pass
Coil LengthCoil length shall meet specification based on coil model.Pass
Pusher ElongationElongation force on the pusher to cause release cord actuation mustmeet specification.Pass
Pusher Skive TensileTensile strength of pusher must meet specification.Pass
TestSpecificationResults
Primary wind weldtensile strengthPrimary implant weld tensile strengths must meet specification.Pass
Couple Tube TensileCoupler Weld tensile strength must meet specification.Pass
Shield Coil TensileShield Coil weld tensile strength shall meet specification.Pass
DetachmentDetachment times will be less than 5s.Pass
DetachmentThe coil should be able to be manually detached by the back-upmethod at the secondary detachment break location.Pass
Fiber Amount CountingFiber amount shall meet specification based on coil model.Pass
Fiber Pull Out ForceFiber pull out force shall meet specification.Pass
Distribution SimulationDevice shall keep integrity with packaging throughout shipping.Pass

{8}------------------------------------------------

K202850

Page 6 of 6

Conclusion:

The subject Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil and Instant Detacher is substantially equivalent to the predicate Concerto Detachable Coil System. There is no change to the Indication for Use (IFU) Statement for the subject device in comparison to the predicate device. The subject and the predicate devices differ slightly in regard to minor technological characteristics, while maintaining the same fundamental scientific technology. The information provided in this submission supports a determination of substantial equivalence for the subject Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coil and Instant Detacher.

§ 870.3300 Vascular embolization device.

(a)
Identification. A vascular embolization device is an intravascular implant intended to control hemorrhaging due to aneurysms, certain types of tumors (e.g., nephroma, hepatoma, uterine fibroids), and arteriovenous malformations. This does not include cyanoacrylates and other embolic agents, which act by polymerization or precipitation. Embolization devices used in neurovascular applications are also not included in this classification, see § 882.5950 of this chapter.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls.) The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Vascular and Neurovascular Embolization Devices.” For availability of this guidance document, see § 870.1(e).