(129 days)
Not Found
No
The device description and performance studies focus on mechanical properties and biocompatibility of bone plates and screws, with no mention of AI or ML.
Yes
The device is indicated for "fixation of long bone fractures," which is a form of medical treatment.
No
Explanation: The EVOS Large Fragment Plating System is indicated for fixation of long bone fractures. This is a therapeutic function, not a diagnostic one. Diagnostic devices are used to identify or detect a disease or condition.
No
The device description explicitly states it is comprised of physical components like plates and screws, which are hardware.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is for the "fixation of long bone fractures" in adult patients. This is a surgical procedure performed directly on the patient's body.
- Device Description: The device is a "Large Fragment Plating System" comprised of plates and screws. These are implants used to stabilize bone fractures.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: IVD devices are used to examine specimens (like blood, urine, or tissue) taken from the human body to provide information about a physiological state, health, or disease. This device does not perform any such analysis of specimens.
- Performance Studies: The performance studies described (FEA, bending, torque, pull-out, MRI compatibility, packaging, endotoxin, biocompatibility) are all related to the mechanical and biological properties of an implantable device, not the analytical performance of an IVD.
Therefore, the EVOS Large Fragment Plating System is a surgical implant, not an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The EVOS Large Fragment Plating System is indicated for adult patients. It is indicated for fixation of long bone fractures.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
HRS, HWC, NDG
Device Description
Subject of this premarket notification is the EVOS Large Fragment Plating System. The proposed devices incorporate design features similar to those currently incorporated on previously cleared Smith & Nephew bone plate and screw systems. Like their previously cleared counterparts, the proposed plates feature a screw-to-plate locking feature that permits their use with the proposed and compatibility designed locking and non-locking screws described in this premarket notification. It is comprised of a variety of locking and non-locking 4.5mm straight plates, 3.5mm and 4.5mm anatomical plates as well as previously cleared 3.5mm locking and non-locking screws and new 4.5mm locking and non-locking screws, 5.7mm cannulated locking screws, 6.5mm locking and nonlocking screws, and 6.7mm high-torque (osteopenia) screws.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
long bone
Indicated Patient Age Range
adult patients
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
- Finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted on the proposed plate designs to determine the worst case plates for further mechanical testing. Plates were separated into groups for evaluation based upon similar designs or anatomical application.
- Bending performance was evaluated through static or cantilever bend testing or construct fatigue testing for the worst case plate designs identified through FEA. Results of the testing determined that the subject plates performed similar or superior to the predicate plates tested, when evaluated under the same conditions.
- Static cantilever bending and fatigue performance of the locking mechanism for the 4.5mm screws were evaluated at a fixed angle through the threaded locking mechanism and variable angle locking holes and the results met the acceptance criteria in that they were similar or superior (higher) than the predicates.
- Torque to failure testing for the proposed 4.5mm bone screws as the worst case was conducted following the guidelines of ASTM F543. The acceptance criterion was met in that the static torsional performance of the EVOS screws was found to be similar to the static torsional performance of a previously cleared predicate device.
- Axial pull-out testing was conducted on the proposed 4.5mm, 5.7mm, 6.5mm and 6.7mm screws following the guidelines of ASTM F543. The acceptance criterion was met in that the subject screws that were tested showed similar or superior (higher) pull-out strength compared to the predicates or met the performance criteria from FDA Guidance for Orthopedic Non-Spinal Metallic Bone Screws and Washers – Performance Criteria for Safety and Performance Based Pathway.
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility testing was conducted as per the FDA's guidance "Establishing Safety and Compatibility of Passive Implants in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment", December 11, 2014.
- Packaging verification testing was conducted for the proposed packaging configurations and the results of this testing demonstrated that the product will not be damaged during shipment and will adequately maintain sterility post shipment.
- Bacterial endotoxin testing was completed and met the acceptable endotoxin limits as stated in the FDA Guidance, "Submission and Review of Sterility Information in Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions for Devices Labeled as Sterile," "Pyrogen and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers," and ANSI/AAMI ST72.
- EVOS Large Fragment Fracture Plating System Biocompatibility Testing
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
K033669, K162078, K061352, K072818, K092015, K993106
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 888.3030 Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories.
(a)
Identification. Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
November 16, 2020
Smith & Nephew, Inc. Thomas Fearnley Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1450 E Brooks Rd Memphis, Tennessee 38116
Re: K201918
Trade/Device Name: EVOS Large Fragment Plating System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/Multiple Component Metallic Bone Fixation Appliances And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HRS. HWC. NDG Dated: September 1, 2020 Received: September 2, 2020
Dear Thomas Fearnley:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
1
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shumaya Ali, M.P.H. Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative, Repair and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K201918
Device Name EVOS Large Fragment Plating System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The EVOS Large Fragment Plating System is indicated for adult patients. It is indicated for fixation of long bone fractures.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
---|
Commercial Use (e.g., Sales, Rentals) |
Personal Use (e.g., Recreation) |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
We are smith&nephew
| Submitted by: | Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Orthopaedic Division
1450 East Brooks Road
Memphis, Tennessee 38116 |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date of Summary: | June 19, 2020 |
| Name of Device: | EVOS Large Fragment Plating System |
| Common Name: | Bone Plates |
| Device Classification Name and
Reference: | 21 CFR 888.3030 Single/multiple component metallic bone
fixation appliances and accessories |
| | 21 CFR 888.3040 Smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation
fastener |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Panel Code: | Orthopaedics/87 |
| Product Code: | HRS, HWC, NDG |
Predicates
| Manufacturer | Description | Submission
Number | Clearance Date |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------|
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Smith & Nephew Locking Bone Plate System (PERI-LOC) Primary Predicate | K033669 | December 10, 2003 |
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. | EVOS Small Fragment Plating System Straight Plates and Screws | K162078 | November 18, 2016 |
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. | PERI-LOC Periarticular Locked Plating System for the Upper Extremity | K061352 | June 8, 2006 |
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. | PERI-LOC Proximal Femur Locking Bone Plates, Bone Screws and Cable Accessories | K072818 | November 19, 2007 |
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. | PERI-LOC Periarticular Locked Plating System for Lower & Upper Extremity | K092015 | July 30, 2009 |
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Smith & Nephew Bone Plate System (TC-100) | K993106 | December 09, 1999 |
4
Device Description
Subject of this premarket notification is the EVOS Large Fragment Plating System. The proposed devices incorporate design features similar to those currently incorporated on previously cleared Smith & Nephew bone plate and screw systems. Like their previously cleared counterparts, the proposed plates feature a screw-to-plate locking feature that permits their use with the proposed and compatibility designed locking and non-locking screws described in this premarket notification. It is comprised of a variety of locking and non-locking 4.5mm straight plates, 3.5mm and 4.5mm anatomical plates as well as previously cleared 3.5mm locking and non-locking screws and new 4.5mm locking and non-locking screws, 5.7mm cannulated locking screws, 6.5mm locking and nonlocking screws, and 6.7mm high-torque (osteopenia) screws.
Indications for Use
The EVOS Large Fragment Plating System is indicated for adult patients. It is indicated for fixation of long bone fractures.
Technological Characteristics
Device comparisons described in this premarket notification demonstrated that the proposed devices are substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicates with respect to intended use, indications, and performance characteristics. The subject devices include locking and non-locking plates. Screw holes in the locking plates can either be threaded holes or variable angle holes and the non-locking plates have non-threaded holes. The subject screws feature a hex drive and are similar to existing Smith & Nephew predicate screws with respect to threadform and major and minor diameter.
Summary of Pre-Clinical Testing
- Finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted on the proposed plate designs to determine the . worst case plates for further mechanical testing. Plates were separated into groups for evaluation based upon similar designs or anatomical application.
- . Bending performance was evaluated through static or cantilever bend testing or construct fatigue testing for the worst case plate designs identified through FEA. Results of the testing determined that the subject plates performed similar or superior to the predicate plates tested, when evaluated under the same conditions.
- Static cantilever bending and fatigue performance of the locking mechanism for the 4.5mm . screws were evaluated at a fixed angle through the threaded locking mechanism and variable angle locking holes and the results met the acceptance criteria in that they were similar or superior (higher) than the predicates.
- Torque to failure testing for the proposed 4.5mm bone screws as the worst case was conducted following the guidelines of ASTM F543. The acceptance criterion was met in that the static torsional performance of the EVOS screws was found to be similar to the static torsional performance of a previously cleared predicate device.
- Axial pull-out testing was conducted on the proposed 4.5mm, 5.7mm, 6.5mm and 6.7mm ● screws following the guidelines of ASTM F543. The acceptance criterion was met in that the subject screws that were tested showed similar or superior (higher) pull-out strength compared to the predicates or met the performance criteria from FDA Guidance for Orthopedic Non-Spinal Metallic Bone Screws and Washers – Performance Criteria for Safety and Performance Based Pathway.
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility testing was conducted as per the FDA's guidance "Establishing Safety and Compatibility of Passive Implants in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment", December 11, 2014.
5
- . Packaging verification testing was conducted for the proposed packaging configurations and the results of this testing demonstrated that the product will not be damaged during shipment and will adequately maintain sterility post shipment.
- Bacterial endotoxin testing was completed and met the acceptable endotoxin limits as stated . in the FDA Guidance, "Submission and Review of Sterility Information in Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions for Devices Labeled as Sterile," "Pyrogen and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers," and ANSI/AAMI ST72.
- EVOS Large Fragment Fracture Plating System Biocompatibility Testing ●
Conclusion
This Traditional 510(k) premarket notification is being submitted to request clearance for the EVOS Large Fracture Plating System. Based on similarities to the predicate plating systems and a review of the mechanical testing performed, the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.