(17 days)
Not Found
No
The document describes standard software functionalities for radiation therapy QA, including dose calculation, measurement analysis, and log analysis. There is no mention of AI, ML, or related concepts in the provided text.
No
The device is a software application intended for patient quality assurance activities for radiation therapy treatment delivery systems, not for directly treating or diagnosing patients.
No
The myQA iON product focuses on quality assurance for radiation therapy treatment delivery systems and patient treatment plans, ensuring the accuracy and safety of the radiation delivery rather than diagnosing a medical condition in a patient.
Yes
The device description explicitly states it is a "server-based software application" and details its functions as a "software toolbox" for quality assurance activities. While it interfaces with hardware systems (Treatment Planning System, Treatment Delivery System, external measurement devices), the device itself is described solely as software. The performance studies also focus on software and system-level testing, not hardware validation.
Based on the provided information, the myQA iON device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is to perform patient quality assurance activities for radiation therapy treatment delivery systems. This involves verifying the treatment plan and delivery, which are processes related to the treatment itself, not the diagnosis of a disease or condition using in vitro methods.
- Device Description: The device is a software application that interfaces with treatment planning systems, oncology information systems, treatment delivery systems, and external measurement devices. It focuses on dose calculation, measurement analysis, and machine log analysis – all related to the radiation therapy process.
- Lack of In Vitro Activities: There is no mention of the device being used to examine specimens derived from the human body (like blood, tissue, urine, etc.) outside of the body to obtain information for diagnostic purposes.
IVD devices are specifically designed to perform tests on biological samples to diagnose, monitor, or screen for diseases or conditions. The myQA iON device's function is centered around ensuring the accuracy and safety of radiation therapy delivery, which is a treatment modality.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The intended use of the myQA iON product is to perform patient quality assurance activities for radiation therapy treatment delivery systems. myQA iON is a software toolbox allowing the Medical Physicist to perform quality assurance activities before and after the patient treatment fractions for all patients undergoing radiation therapy.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
LHN, IYI
Device Description
The myQA iON product is a server-based software application for performing patient quality assurance for radiation therapy. In its full scope, the product delivers means for the verification of:
The patient treatment plan prior to the first treatment fraction by
Using an independent dose algorithm to compute a dose map based on the patient treatment plan;
Performing measurements using external measurement devices and analyzing the results;
Performing machine log analysis during a treatment dry run session and reconstructing the delivered dose.
The patient treatment delivery by
Performing machine log analysis and reconstructing the reconstructed dose for each treatment fraction.
In its full scope, the product interfaces with the Treatment Planning System, the Oncology Information System, the treatment delivery System and the external measurement device.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
The product is designed to be used by trained radiation oncology health professionals only.
The typical users of myQA iON are the certified Medical Physicists and technicians/dosimetrists in the radiation therapy department. The users are skilled and trained to practice patient QA activities in a clinical environment.
The typical environment of use for myQA iON is the radiation therapy center. However, as myQA iON is a web application, the environment of use can vary depending on the location of the user.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
IBA Dosimetry performed system and software level tests to assess the performance of the myQA iON product. The following tests have been provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
Risk Analysis Testing verifying the implementation of the identified hazard mitigation;
Software Testing verifying the correct software implementation;
Physics Testing verifying the correct behavior of the physics algorithms;
Integration Testing verifying the correct integration of the different software components;
System Testing verifying the correct implementation of the clinical workflow;
Beta Testing validating the usability of the software.
The subject of this premarket submission, the IBA Dosimetry myQA iON product, did not require clinical testing to support substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 892.5050 Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system.
(a)
Identification. A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II. When intended for use as a quality control system, the film dosimetry system (film scanning system) included as an accessory to the device described in paragraph (a) of this section, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
0
July 17, 2020
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left side of the image, there is a symbol that represents the Department of Health & Human Services-USA. To the right of the symbol, there is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. Next to the blue square, the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" are written in blue.
IBA Dosimetry GmbH % Mr. Dave Yungvirt CEO, Official Correspondent Third Party Review Group, LLC 25 Independence Blvd. WARREN NJ 07059
Re: K201798
Trade/Device Name: myQA iON Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5050 Regulation Name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LHN, IYE Dated: June 28, 2020 Received: June 30, 2020
Dear Mr. Yungvirt:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
1
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
For
Thalia T. Mills, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image is a logo for an organization called "Iba". The logo is white and is set against a green background. The logo features a stylized lowercase "Iba" with a curved line above the "I" that resembles a swoosh or a stylized leaf. The overall design is simple and modern.
- Indication for Use Statement
3
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2020 See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K201798
Device Name myQA iON
Indications for Use (Describe)
The intended use of the myQA iON product is to perform patient quality assurance activities for radiation therapy treatment delivery systems. myQA iON is a software toolbox allowing the Medical Physicist to perform quality assurance activities before and after the patient treatment fractions for all patients undergoing radiation therapy.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
---|
------------------------------------------------- |
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
---|---|---|
-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the
time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete
and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (7/17)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
4
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image features a logo set against a solid green background. The logo consists of the lowercase letters 'lba' in a stylized, cursive font, stacked vertically. Above the 'l' is a curved, swooping line that extends to the left, with a small circle positioned at its end, resembling a stylized person or a design element. The overall design is clean and modern, with the white logo providing a strong contrast against the green background.
5. 510(k) Summary of 510(k) Statement
5
510(k) Summary
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92 the following summary of information is provided: K201798 Date: January 17th, 2019
1. 510(k) Holder:
Company: IBA Dosimetry GmbH Attention: Andreas Suchi, Executive Director QRS Adresse: Bahnhofstrasse 5, 90592 Schwarzenbruck – Germany Phone: +49 9128 607943 Fax : +49 9128 607-10 Email : Andreas.Suchi@iba-group.com
2. Device
Trade Name | myQA iON |
---|---|
Common Name | Patient Quality Assurance Software |
Classification Name | Medical Charged -Particle Therapy Systems |
Classification regulation | 21 CFR § 892.5050 |
Classification Code | Main Product Code: LHN, Second Product Code: IYI |
3. Predicate Device
The myQA iON product for Patient quality assurance in radiation therapy is substantially equivalent to the cleared product Mobius Medical Systems, Mobius3D (K153014). The intended uses are the same as well as the technological characteristics.
4. Device Description
The myQA iON product is a server-based software application for performing patient quality assurance for radiation therapy. In its full scope, the product delivers means for the verification of:
- . The patient treatment plan prior to the first treatment fraction by
- . Using an independent dose algorithm to compute a dose map based on the patient treatment plan;
6
- . Performing measurements using external measurement devices and analyzing the results;
- . Performing machine log analysis during a treatment dry run session and reconstructing the delivered dose.
- The patient treatment delivery by
- Performing machine log analysis and reconstructing the delivered dose . for each treatment fraction.
In its full scope, the product interfaces with the Treatment Planning System, the Oncology Information System, the treatment delivery System and the external measurement device.
5. Intended Use
The intended use of the myQA iON product is to perform patient quality assurance activities for radiation therapy treatment delivery systems. myQA iON is a software toolbox allowing the Medical Physicist to perform quality assurance activities before and after the patient treatment fractions for all patients undergoing radiation therapy.
6. Non-Intended Use
The product is not intended to be a treatment planning system, nor is it intended to have direct or indirect contact with patients.
7. Intended User
The product is designed to be used by trained radiation oncology health professionals only.
The typical users of myQA iON are the certified Medical Physicists and technicians/dosimetrists in the radiation therapy department. The users are skilled and trained to practice patient QA activities in a clinical environment.
8. Summary of Technological Characteristics compared to the predicate device
The myQA iON and the Mobius3D (K153014 - predicate device) products are identical in terms of intended use, principles of operation and clinical performance. The difference between both systems is the type of radiation therapy they are used for.
7
The following table gives a high-level overview of the technical characteristics
Characteristics | myQA iON | Mobius3D | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
DICOM handling | |||
-manual import | |||
-automatic import | |||
-export | Yes | Yes | The export is not needed to fulfill |
the intended use of myQA iON | |||
Yes | Yes | ||
Yes | Yes | ||
No | Yes | ||
Independent dose calculation | Yes | Yes | |
Analysis of external | |||
measurements of radiation | |||
fields | Yes | Yes | myQA iON provides a wider panel |
of analysis tools based on the | |||
physical measurements of | |||
radiation fields through the | |||
analysis of manually uploaded | |||
machine log files and manually | |||
uploaded MatriXX measurement | |||
files (MatriXX, FDA listing Number | |||
D032576, IBA Dosimetry GmbH). | |||
Gamma analysis | Yes | Yes | |
Patient QA report generation | Yes | Yes | |
Server based | Yes | Yes | myQA iON can be accessed via |
web-browser from any computer | |||
connected to the (private) | |||
network | |||
Email notification | No | Yes | not required to fulfill myQA iON |
intended use | |||
Evaluation settings | |||
modification | Yes | Yes | |
Plan approval | Yes | Yes | |
PDF export of patient QA | |||
report | Yes | Yes |
The differences between the products in the table above do not influence the safety and effectiveness of the myQA iON device nor does it prevent it from fulfilling its intended use.
The difference between myQA iON and the Mobius3D devices lies in the area of application. While both are designed to perform patient quality assurances tasks for radiation therapy, the Mobius3D focuses on radio-therapy whereas the myQA iON focuses on proton therapy.
We believe that in the present case, this difference is neglectable to prove substantial equivalence. Indeed, the clinical workflows are identical for both proton and radio-therapy patient quality assurance. In both cases, the treatment plan is created in DICOM format on the treatment planning system and exported to the quality assurance platform. The platform then computes an independent dose using a Monte Carlo dose engine and allows the user to complement the analysis by using machine irradiation log and ion chamber measurements at the isocenter.
8
9. Environment of Use
The typical environment of use for myQA iON is the radiation therapy center. However, as myQA iON is a web application, the environment of use can vary depending on the location of the user.
10. Summary of Non-Clinical Test
IBA Dosimetry performed system and software level tests to assess the performance of the myQA iON product. The following tests have been provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
- . Risk Analysis Testing verifying the implementation of the identified hazard mitigation;
- . Software Testing verifying the correct software implementation;
- . Physics Testing verifying the correct behavior of the physics algorithms;
- Integration Testing verifying the correct integration of the different software components;
- . System Testing verifying the correct implementation of the clinical workflow;
- . Beta Testing validating the usability of the software.
11. Summary of Clinical Test
The subject of this premarket submission, the IBA Dosimetry myQA iON product, did not require clinical testing to support substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
12. Conclusion
The verification and validation activities ensure that the IBA Dosimetry myQA iON product provides substantial equivalence in terms of safety, effectiveness and performance to the predicate device.