(30 days)
SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card is competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Oxycodone, Secobarbital, Buprenorphine, Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine, Phencyclidine, Methadone, Nortriptyline d-Propoxyphene and 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in human urine at the cutoff concentrations listed. The test may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS or LC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. The tests are intended for over-the-counter use.
SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup is competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Marijuana, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Oxycodone, Secobarbital, Buprenorphine, Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine, Phencyclidine, Methadone, Nortriptyline d-Propoxyphene and 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in human urine at the cutoff concentrations listed. The test may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Nortriptyline, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS or LC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. The tests are intended for over-the-counter use.
The SAFECARE® Dip Card Tests and SAFECARE® Cup Tests are immunochromatographic assays that use a lateral flow system for the qualitative detection of Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Cocaine, Cannabinoids, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Secobarbital, Methadone, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Oxycodone, Buprenorphine, Phencyclidine, Nortriptyline, Propoxyphen and 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (target analytes) in human urine. The products are single-use in vitro diagnostic devices, which come in the formats of Dip Cards or Cups. Each test kit contains a Test Device (in one of the two formats), a package insert and a urine cup for sample collection. Each test device is sealed with a desiccant in an aluminum pouch.
The provided text describes the performance characteristics of the SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card and SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup. The document details analytical performance (precision, linearity, stability, interference, specificity, effect of specific gravity and pH) and comparison studies (method comparison and lay-user study).
Here's a breakdown of the requested information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria for each analytical performance characteristic are implicitly defined by the successful results reported in the study. The study aims to demonstrate that the device performs as expected according to its intended use and analytical specifications.
-
Precision:
- Acceptance Criteria for -100% to -25% Cut-off: All samples should test negative.
- Acceptance Criteria for +25% to +100% Cut-off: All samples should test positive.
- Acceptance Criteria for Cut-off (nominal concentration): Approximately 50% positive and 50% negative results (reflecting the nature of the cut-off).
- Reported Device Performance (for 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine as an example):
- Dip Card (Lot 1, 2, 3):
- -100% Cut-off to -25% Cut-off: 50-/0+ (All negative)
- +25% Cut-off to +100% Cut-off: 50+/0- (All positive)
- Cut-off: 24-/26+, 25-/25+, 26-/24+ (Split between positive and negative, as expected)
- Cup (Lot 1, 2, 3):
- -100% Cut-off to -25% Cut-off: 50-/0+ (All negative)
- +25% Cut-off to +100% Cut-off: 50+/0- (All positive)
- Cut-off: 27-/23+, 24-/26+, 26-/24+ (Split between positive and negative, as expected)
- Dip Card (Lot 1, 2, 3):
-
Interference:
- Acceptance Criteria: No interference from common physiological or pathological substances at specified concentrations.
- Reported Device Performance: No interference observed for a comprehensive list of compounds at 100ug/mL (except albumin at 100mg/dL and ethanol at 1% volume).
-
Specificity (Cross-Reactivity):
- Acceptance Criteria: Related compounds should either not cross-react or cross-react at concentrations significantly higher than the cut-off, as defined by medical relevance.
- Reported Device Performance (for 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine as an example):
- Methadone: Positive at 300000 ng/mL (0.1% cross-reactivity)
- EMDP: Positive at 300000 ng/mL (0.1% cross-reactivity)
- Doxylamine, Disopyramide, LAAM HCl, Alpha Methadol: Positive at >100,000 ng/mL (<0.3% cross-reactivity)
-
Effect of Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH:
- Acceptance Criteria: Reliable results (positive above cut-off, negative below cut-off) across a specified range of specific gravity and pH.
- Reported Device Performance: All samples at and above +25% Cut-Off were positive, and all samples at and below -25% Cut-Off were negative, for specific gravity from 1.000 to 1.035 and pH 4 to 9.
-
Method Comparison Study (Clinical Samples):
- Acceptance Criteria: High agreement (minimal discordant results) between the device results and LC/MS (Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry) results, especially for samples near the cut-off.
- Reported Device Performance (for 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine as an example):
- Dip Card: High concordance with LC/MS, with few discordant results (e.g., Viewer A: 1 false positive at 291 ng/mL; Viewer B: 1 false negative at 309 ng/mL).
- Cup: High concordance with LC/MS, with few discordant results (e.g., Viewer A: 1 false positive at 285 ng/mL; Viewer B: 1 false negative at 372 ng/mL).
-
Lay-user Study:
- Acceptance Criteria: High percentage of correct results for samples well below and well above the cut-off, and reasonable performance for samples near the cut-off, when interpreted by lay users. Ease of understanding instructions.
- Reported Device Performance (for specific drugs like Amphetamine (AMP), Cocaine (COC), THC, BAR, BZO, MET, MTD, MDMA, OXY, OPI, BUP, PCP, TCA, PPX, EDDP as examples):
- For samples at -100% to -50% Cut-off and +50% to +75% Cut-off: 100% correct results across all drugs.
- For samples at -25% Cut-off: generally 90-95% correct negative results (some false positives).
- For samples at +25% Cut-off: generally 85-95% correct positive results (some false negatives).
- All lay users indicated the device instructions were easy to follow (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level 7).
2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and the Data Provenance
- Precision Study: For each drug and concentration, two runs per day for 25 days per device (Dip Card and Cup), implying a total of 50 tests per concentration per lot. With 3 lots, this is 150 tests per concentration per format. There were 9 concentrations tested. So 150*9 = 1350 tests per drug per format.
- Interference Study: Not explicitly stated, but tests were performed on "three batches of each device" for various interfering substances spiked into drug-free and drug-spiked urine samples.
- Specificity Study: Not explicitly stated how many tests per compound, but "three batches of each device" were used.
- Effect of Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH Study: "three lots of each device" were used for samples spiked with target drugs at +/- 25% Cut-Off levels across the range of specific gravity and pH.
- Method Comparison Study: 80 "unaltered clinical samples" for each drug (40 negative and 40 positive relative to cut-off). This was conducted "in-house." The provenance of the clinical samples is not specified beyond being "clinical samples."
- Lay-user Study: 310 lay persons for each device format. The samples were prepared by spiking drugs into "drug free-pooled urine specimens." The concentrations were confirmed by LC/MS. Thus, the samples were prepared and not naturally occurring clinical samples.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts
- For the Precision, Interference, Specificity, and Effect of Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH Studies: The ground truth was established by precise laboratory preparation of samples where drug concentrations were known and confirmed by LC/MS. There were no human experts classifying these samples for ground truth.
- For the Method Comparison Study: The ground truth was established by LC/MS results. LC/MS is a highly accurate and definitive analytical method. The text does not mention human experts establishing ground truth for these samples; it was based on the objective chemical analysis. The "three laboratory assistants" were operators performing the device tests, not establishing ground truth.
- For the Lay-user Study: The ground truth was the known drug concentration of the prepared urine samples, confirmed by LC/MS.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Precision, Interference, Specificity, and Effect of Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH Studies: No human adjudication was mentioned as the ground truth was based on precisely prepared samples with known concentrations.
- Method Comparison Study: The device results were compared directly to LC/MS results. There was no adjudication mentioned involving human experts to reconcile discrepancies between device and LC/MS. Discrepancies were simply reported as "discordant results."
- Lay-user Study: Comparisons were made against the known LC/MS confirmed concentrations of the prepared samples. No human adjudication was mentioned.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. This device is a rapid diagnostic test (lateral flow immunoassay) for drug detection, where the "reading" is a visual interpretation of lines by a user (or laboratory assistant in the method comparison study). It does not appear to involve AI or sophisticated image analysis where human readers would be "assisted" by AI. The "lay-user study" involved multiple readers (310 lay persons), but it was designed to assess the ease of use and accuracy of the device itself by untrained individuals, not to compare human performance with and without AI assistance.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done
- This device is a lateral flow immunoassay intended for visual interpretation. It does not have an "algorithm only" component in the sense of a software-based AI system. Its performance inherently involves a "human-in-the-loop" to view and interpret the test lines.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- The primary ground truth used throughout the studies (precision, interference, specificity, method comparison, and lay-user study) was LC/MS (Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry), which is a definitive analytical method for confirming drug concentrations in urine samples. For analytical studies, ground truth was also established by careful preparation of samples with known drug concentrations.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
- This document describes performance studies for an immunochromatographic assay, which is a chemical/biological test, not a machine learning or AI model. Therefore, there is no "training set" in the context of AI model development. The assays are "trained" during their manufacturing and chemical formulation processes to react at specific cut-off levels.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- As stated above, this device is not an AI/ML product and thus does not have a "training set" with ground truth in that context. The "training" of the assay refers to its inherent chemical design to react to certain drug concentrations, which relies on established analytical chemistry principles and known drug properties.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" and "ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
May 27, 2020
Safecare Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. % Joe Shia Manager LSI International 504 E Diamond Ave., Suite I Gaithersburg, MD 20877
Re: K201120
Trade/Device Name: SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.3100 Regulation Name: Amphetamine Test System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NFT, NFW, NFY, NGG, NGI, NFV, NGL, PTH, NGM, PTG, QAW, QBF Dated: April 23, 2020 Received: April 27, 2020
Dear Joe Shia:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Marianela Perez-Torres, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K201120
Device Name
SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup
Indications for Use (Describe)
SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card is competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Oxycodone, Secobarbital, Buprenorphine, Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine, Phencyclidine, Methadone, Nortriptyline d-Propoxyphene and 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug(Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine | 1000 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine | 300 ng/mL |
| Marijuana | 50 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine | 1000 ng/mL |
| Morphine | 2000 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone | 100 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital | 300 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine | 10 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine | 500 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine | 25 ng/mL |
| Methadone | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline | 1000 ng/mL |
| d-Propoxyphene | 300 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine | 300 ng/mL |
Configuration of SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card can consist of any combination of the above listed drug analytes.
The test may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS or LC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. The tests are intended for over-the-counter use.
SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup is competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Marijuana, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Oxycodone, Secobarbital, Buprenorphine, Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine, Phencyclidine, Methadone, Nortriptyline d-Propoxyphene and 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug(Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine | 1000 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam | 300 ng/mL |
| FORM FDA 3881 (7/17) | Page 1 of 2 |
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Cocaine | 300 ng/mL | |
|---|---|---|
| Marijuana | 50 ng/mL | |
| Methamphetamine | 1000 ng/mL | |
| Morphine | 2000 ng/mL | |
| Oxycodone | 100 ng/mL | |
| Secobarbital | 300 ng/mL | |
| Buprenorphine | 10 ng/mL | |
| Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine | 500 ng/mL | |
| Phencyclidine | 25 ng/mL | |
| Methadone | 300 ng/mL | |
| Nortriptyline | 1000 ng/mL | |
| d-Propoxyphene | 300 ng/mL | |
| 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine | 300 ng/mL |
Configuration of SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup can consist of any combination of the above listed drug analytes.
The test may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Nortriptyline, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS or LC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method.
The tests are intended for over-the-counter use.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) SUMMARY
510(k) Number: K201120
- May 27, 2020 1. Date: Safecare Biotech (Hangzhou) Co. Ltd. 2. Submitter: 18 Haishu Road, Yuhang District Hangzhou, China 3. Contact person: Joe Shia LSI International Inc. 504E Diamond Ave., Suite I
- Email: shiajl@yahoo.com SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card 4. Device Name: SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup
Gaithersburg, MD 20877 Telephone: 240-505-7880
Classification:
Class 2
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
|---|---|---|---|
| NFTAmphetamine | II | 21 CFR § 862.3100, Amphetamine Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| NFWCannabinoids | II | 21 CFR § 862.3870, Cannabinoids Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| NFYCocaine | II | 21 CFR § 862.3250, Cocaine and Cocaine Metabolites Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| NGGMethamphetamine | II | 21 CFR § 862.3610, Methamphetamine Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| NGIMorphine | II | 21 CFR § 862.3640, Morphine Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| NFVOxazepam | II | 21 CFR § 862.3170, Benzodiazepine Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| NGLOxycodone | II | 21 CFR § 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| PTHSecobarbital | II | 21 CFR § 862.3150, Barbiturate Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| NGLBuprenorphine | II | 21 CFR § 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| NGGMethylenedioxy-methamphetamine | II | 21 CFR § 862.3610, Methamphetamine Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| NGMPhencyclidine | unclassified | Enzyme Immunoassay Phencyclidine | Toxicology (91) |
| PTGMethadone | II | 21 CFR § 862.3620, Methadone Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| QAWNortriptyline | II | 21 CFR, 862.3910 Tricyclic Antidepressant Drugs Test System | Toxicology (91) |
| QBFPropoxyphene | II | 21 CFR, 862.3700 Propoxyphene Test System | Toxicology (91) |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTG2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine | II | 21 CFR § 862.3620, Methadone Test System | Toxicology(91) |
-
- Predicate Device
The SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card and SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup (K182654)
- Predicate Device
-
- Intended Use
SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card is competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Cocaine, Marijuana, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Oxycodone, Secobarbital, Buprenorphine, Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine, Phencyclidine, Methadone, Nortriptyline d-Propoxyphene and 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
- Intended Use
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine | 1000 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine | 300 ng/mL |
| Marijuana | 50 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine | 1000 ng/mL |
| Morphine | 2000 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone | 100 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital | 300 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine | 10 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine | 500 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine | 25 ng/mL |
| Methadone | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline | 1000 ng/mL |
| d-Propoxyphene | 300 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine | 300 ng/mL |
Configuration of SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Dip Card can consist of any combination of the above listed drug analytes.
The test may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Nortriptyline, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS or LC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. The tests are intended for over-the-counter use.
SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup is competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Cocaine, Marijuana, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Oxycodone, Secobarbital, Buprenorphine, Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine, Phencyclidine, Methadone, Nortriptyline d
{6}------------------------------------------------
Propoxyphene and 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine | 1000 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine | 300 ng/mL |
| Marijuana | 50 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine | 1000 ng/mL |
| Morphine | 2000 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone | 100 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital | 300 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine | 10 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine | 500 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine | 25 ng/mL |
| Methadone | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline | 1000 ng/mL |
| d-Propoxyphene | 300 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine | 300 ng/mL |
Configuration of SAFECARE® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup can consist of any combination of the above listed drug analytes.
The test may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine. Nortriptyline, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be exercised with any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary result is positive. The test provides only preliminary test results. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. GC/MS or LC/MS is the preferred confirmatory method. The tests are intended for over-the-counter use.
7. Device Description
The SAFECARE® Dip Card Tests and SAFECARE® Cup Tests are immunochromatographic assays that use a lateral flow system for the qualitative detection of Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Cocaine, Cannabinoids, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Secobarbital, Methadone, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Oxycodone, Buprenorphine, Phencyclidine, Nortriptyline, Propoxyphen and 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (target analytes) in human urine. The products are single-use in vitro diagnostic devices, which come in the formats of Dip Cards or Cups. Each test kit contains a Test Device (in one of the two formats), a package insert and a urine cup for sample collection. Each test device is sealed with a desiccant in an aluminum pouch.
8. Substantial Equivalence Information
A summary comparison of features of the SAFECARE® Dip Card Tests and SAFECARE® Cup Tests and the predicate devices is provided in following tables.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Table 1: Features Comparison of SAFECARE® Dip Card Tests and the Predicate Device
| Item | Device | Predicate - K182654 |
|---|---|---|
| Indication(s)for Use | For the qualitative determination of drugs ofabuse in human urine. | Same (but the number ofdrugs detected isdifferent) |
| Similarities | ||
| Methodology | Competitive binding, lateral flowimmunochromatographic assays based onthe principle of antigen antibodyimmunochemistry. | Same |
| Type of Test | Qualitative | Same |
| Specimen Type | Human Urine | Same |
| Intended Use | For over-the-counter | Same |
| Configurations | Dip Card | Same |
| Differences | ||
| Calibrator and Cut-OffValues | Amphetamine (AMP): 1,000 ng/mlOxazepam (BZO):300 ng/mlCocaine (COC): 300 ng/ml11-Nor-△9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-9-COOH(THC):50 ng/mlMethamphetamine (MET): 1,000 ng/mlMorphine (OPI): 2000ng/mlSecobarbital (BAR): 300 ng/mlMethadone (MTD): 300 ng/mlMethylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA): 500 ng/mlOxycodone (OXY): 100 ng/mlBuprenorphine (BUP): 10 ng/mlPhencyclidine (PCP): 25 ng/mlNortriptyline (TCA): 1000 ng/mlPropoxyphene (PPX): 300 ng/ml2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP): 300 ng/mL | Same as candidate devicewith exclusion of 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine(EDDP): 300 ng/mL |
Table 2: Features Comparison of SAFECARE® Cup Tests and the Predicate Devices
| Item | Device | Predicate - K182654 |
|---|---|---|
| Indication(s)for Use | For the qualitative determination ofdrugs of abuse in human urine. | Same (but the number ofdrugs detected is different) |
| Similarities |
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Methodology | Competitive binding, lateral flowimmunochromatographic assays based onthe principle of antigen antibodyimmunochemistry. | Same |
|---|---|---|
| Type of Test | Qualitative | Same |
| Specimen Type | Human Urine | Same |
| Intended Use | For over-the-counter | Same |
| Configurations | Cup | Cup |
| Differences | ||
| Calibrator and Cut-OffValues | Amphetamine (AMP): 1,000 ng/mlOxazepam (BZO):300 ng/mlCocaine (COC): 300 ng/ml11-Nor-△9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-9-COOH(THC):50 ng/mlMethamphetamine (MET): 1,000 ng/mlMorphine (OPI): 2000ng/mLSecobarbital (BAR): 300 ng/mlMethadone (MTD): 300 ng/mlMethylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA): 500 ng/mlOxycodone (OXY): 100 ng/mlBuprenorphine (BUP): 10 ng/mlPhencyclidine (PCP): 25 ng/mlNortriptyline (TCA): 1000 ng/ml | Same as candidate devicewith exclusion of 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine(EDDP): 300 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX): 300 ng/ml2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP): 300ng/mL |
9. Test Principle
The SAFECARE® Dip Card Tests, and SAFECARE® Cup Tests are rapid tests for the qualitative detection of Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Cocaine, Cannabinoids, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Secobarbital, Methadone, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Oxycodone, Buprenorphine, Phencyclidine, Nortriptyline, Propoxyphen and 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3diphenylpyrrolidine in urine samples. The tests are lateral flow chromatographic immunoassays. During testing, a urine specimen migrates upward by capillary action. If target drugs present in the urine specimen are below the cut-off concentration, it will not saturate the binding sites of its specific monoclonal mouse antibody coated on the particles. The antibody-coated particles will then be captured by immobilized drug-conjugate and a visible colored line will show up in the test line region. The colored line will not form in the test line region if the target drug level exceeds its cutoff-concentration because it will saturate all the binding sites of the antibody
{9}------------------------------------------------
coated on the particles. A band should form in the control region of the devices regardless of the presence of drug or metabolite in the sample to indicate that the tests have been performed properly.
-
- Performance Characteristics
-
- Analytical Performance
- a. Precision
Precision studies were carried out for samples with concentrations of -100% cut off, -75% cut off. -50% cut off. -25% cut off. cut off. +25% cut off. +50% cut off. +75% cut off and +100% cut off. These samples were prepared by spiking drug in negative samples. Each drug concentration was confirmed by LC/MS. All sample aliquots were blindly labeled by the person who prepared the samples and didn't take part in the sample testing. For each concentration, tests were performed two runs per day for 25 days per device in a randomized order. The results obtained are summarized in the following tables for 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine. Please refer to K182654 for precision data for Methylenedioxy-Methamphetamine, Oxycodone, Buprenorphine, Phencyclidine, Nortriptyline and Propoxyphene, and to K181968 for precision data for Oxazepam, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Secobarbital and Methadone, and to K153646 for precision data for Amphetamine, Cocaine, and Cannabinoids.
| Dip Card | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ResultsLot Number | -100% Cut-off | -75% Cut-off | -50% Cut-off | -25% Cut-off | Cut-off | Cut-off +25% | Cut-off +50% | Cut-off +75% | Cut-off +100% |
| Lot 1 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 24-/26+ | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 2 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 25-/25+ | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 3 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 26-/24+ | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine
| Cup | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results | |||||||||
| LotNumber | -100%Cut-off | -75%Cut-off | -50%Cut-off | -25%Cut-off | Cut-off | Cut-off+25% | Cut-off+50% | Cut-off+75% | Cut-off+100% |
| Lot 1 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 27-/23+ | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 2 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 24-/26+ | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
| Lot 3 | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 26-/24+ | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- | 50+/0- |
The cut-off value of 300 ng/mL for 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine is verified.
b. Linearity
Not applicable.
-
c. Stability
The devices are stable at 4-30 ℃ for 24 months based on the accelerated stability study at 50 °C and real time stability studies at 4°C and 30 °C. -
d. Interference
Potential interfering substances found in human urine of physiological or pathological conditions were added to drug-free urine and target drugs urine with concentrations at 25% below and 25% above Cut-Off levels. These urine samples were tested using three batches of each device. Compounds that showed no interference at a concentration
{10}------------------------------------------------
of 100ug/mL. with the exception of albumin with no interference at a concentration of 100mg/dL and ethanol at 1% volume, are summarized in the following tables. There were no differences observed between the SAFECARE® Cup and Dip Card formats.
| Acetominophen (4-Acetamidophenol) | Ecgonine methyl ester | D,L-Octopamine |
|---|---|---|
| Acetophenetidin | Erythromycin | Oxalic acid |
| N-Acetylprocainamide | ẞ-Estradiol | Oxolinic acid |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | Ethanol (1% vol) | Oxymetazoline |
| Albumin (100mg/dL) | Fenoprofen | Papaverine |
| Aminopyrine | Furosemide | Penicillin-G |
| Amoxicillin | Gentisic acid | Perphenazine |
| Ampicillin | Hemoglobin | Phenelzine |
| Apomorphine | Hydralazine | Prednisone |
| Ascorbic acid | Hydrochlorothiazide | DL-Propranolol |
| Aspartame | Hydrocortisone | D-Pseudoephedrine |
| Atropine | O-Hydroxyhippuric acid | Quinine |
| Benzilic acid | 3-Hydroxytyramine | Ranitidine |
| Benzoic acid | Ibuprofen | Salicylic acid |
| Bilirubin | D,L-Isoproterenol | Serotonin (5- Hydroxytyramine) |
| Chloralhydrate | Isoxsuprine | Sulfamethazine |
| Chloramphenicol | Ketamine | Sulindac |
| Chlorothiazide | Ketoprofen | Tetrahydrocortisone, 3-acetate |
| Chlorpromazine | Labetalol | Tetrahydrocortisone 3-(β-Dglucuronide) |
| Cholesterol | Loperamide | Tetrahydrozoline |
| Clonidine | Meperidine | Thiamine |
| Cortisone | Meprobamate | Thioridazine |
| (-) Cotinine | Methoxyphenamine | Triamterene |
| Creatinine | Nalidixic acid | DL-Tyrosine |
| Deoxycorticosterone | Naloxone | Trifluoperazine |
| Dextromethorphan | Naltrexone | Trimethoprim |
| Diclofenac | Naproxen | D,L-Tryptophan |
| Diflunisal | Niacinamide | Tyramine |
| Digoxin | Nifedipine | Uric acid |
| Diphenhydramine | Norethindrone | Verapamil |
| Disopyramide | Noscapine | Zomepirac |
e. Specificity
To test specificity, drug metabolites and other structure related compounds that are likely to cross-react in urine samples were tested using three batches of each device. The lowest concentration that caused a positive result for each compound are listed below for 2-ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine. The rest of the data were in K182654 for for Methylenedioxy-Methamphetamine, Oxycodone, reported Buprenorphine, Phencyclidine, Nortriptyline and Propoxyphene, and K181968 for Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Cocaine, Cannabinoids, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Secobarbital and Methadone. There were no differences observed between the SAFECARE® Cup and Dip Card formats.
| Compounds | ResultPositive at(ng/ml) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Methadone | 300000 | 0.1% |
{11}------------------------------------------------
| EMDP | 300000 | 0.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Doxylamine | >100,000 | <0.3% |
| Disopyramide | >100,000 | <0.3% |
| LAAM (Levo-alpha-acetylmethadol) HCl | >100,000 | <0.3% |
| Alpha Methadol | >100,000 | <0.3% |
f. Effect of Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH
To investigate the effect of urine specific gravity and urine pH, urine samples, with 1.000 to 1.035 specific gravity or urine samples with pH 4 to 9 were spiked with target drugs at 25% below and 25% above Cut-Off levels. These samples were tested using three lots of each device. Results were all positive for samples at and above +25% Cut-Off and all negative for samples at and below -25% Cut-Off. There were no differences observed between the SAFECARE® Cup and Dip Card formats.
2. Comparison Studies
Method comparison studies for the SAFECARE® Dip Card Tests and the SAFECARE® Cup Tests were performed in-house with three laboratory assistants for each device. Operators ran 80 (40 negative and 40 positive) unaltered clinical samples for each drug. The samples were blind labeled and compared to LC/MS results are presented in the tables below for 2ethylidene-1, 5-dimethyl-3, 3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP). The rest data were reported in K182654 for Methylenedioxy-Methamphetamine, Oxycodone, Buprenorphine, Phencyclidine, Nortriptyline and Propoxyphene, and in K181968 for Amphetamine, Oxazepam, Cocaine, Cannabinoids, Methamphetamine, Morphine, Secobarbital and Methadone.
| DipCard | Negative | LowNegative byLC/MS(less than-50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between-50% andcutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ViewerA | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 10 | 19 | 0 | 0 | |
| ViewerB | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 0 | |
| ViewerC | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
EDDP
Discordant Results
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | Dip Card Viewer Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | CM2632 | 291 | Positive |
| Viewer B | CM9474 | 309 | Negative |
{12}------------------------------------------------
| Cup | Negative | LowNegative byLC/MS(less than-50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between-50% andcutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 10 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Viewer | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 0 |
| Viewer | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | CupViewer Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | CM1684 | 285 | Positive |
| Viewer B | CM2850 | 372 | Negative |
Lay-user study:
A lay user study was performed at three intended user sites with 310 lay persons for each device format. The lay users had diverse educational and professional backgrounds and ranged in age from 18 to > 50 years. Urine samples were prepared at the following concentrations; negative, +/-75%, +/-50%, +/-25% of the cutoff by spiking drugs into drug free-pooled urine specimens. The concentrations of the samples were confirmed by LC/MS. Each sample was aliquoted into individual containers and blind-labeled. Each participant was provided with the package insert, 1 blind labeled sample and a device. Each device was tested. Typical results are shown below.
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS (ng/mL) | Lay person Results | No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | The percentageof correct results(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 | ||
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 253 | 0 | 20 | 100 | ||
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 496 | 0 | 170 | 100 | ||
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 753 | 2 | 18 | 90 | ||
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 1249 | 17 | 3 | 85 | ||
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 1498 | 40 | 0 | 100 | ||
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 1758 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
{13}------------------------------------------------
COC:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentageof correctresults (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 76 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 147 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 226 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 372 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 449 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 524 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
THC:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | of correct results(%) | |||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 12 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 24 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 36 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 63 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 75 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 88 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
BAR:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentageof correct results(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 76 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 147 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 225 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 374 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 449 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 524 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
{14}------------------------------------------------
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentageof correct results(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 76 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 147 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 227 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 374 | 19 | 1 | 95 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 450 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 526 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
BZO:
MET:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | of correct results(%) | |||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 248 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 497 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 749 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 1251 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 1499 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 1754 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
MTD:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | of correct results(%) | |||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 76 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 147 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 223 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 374 | 17 | 3 | 85 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 450 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 526 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
{15}------------------------------------------------
| % of Cutoff | Number of samples | Drug Concentration by LC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentage of correct results (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Positive | No. of Negative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 501 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 999 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 1501 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 2499 | 19 | 1 | 95 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 2999 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 3501 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
MDMA:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentageof correct results(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 126 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 248 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 375 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 624 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 748 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 877 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
OXY:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentageof correct results(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 25 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 48 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 74 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 126 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 150 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 176 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
OPI:
{16}------------------------------------------------
BUP:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentageof correct results(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 5 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 8 | 2 | 18 | 90 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 13 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 15 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 18 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
PCP:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentageof correct results(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 6 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 12 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 19 | 2 | 18 | 90 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 32 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 37 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 43 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
TCA:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentageof correct results(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 250 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 497 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 750 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 1249 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 1500 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 1749 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
{17}------------------------------------------------
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentageof correct results(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | ||||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 76 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 148 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 223 | 3 | 17 | 85 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 374 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 448 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 525 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
PPX:
EDDP:
| % of Cutoff | Number ofsamples | DrugConcentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | Lay person Results | The percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. ofPositive | No. ofNegative | of correct results(%) | |||
| -100% Cutoff | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -75% Cutoff | 20 | 76 | 0 | 20 | 100 |
| -50% Cutoff | 170 | 152 | 0 | 170 | 100 |
| -25% Cutoff | 20 | 226 | 1 | 19 | 95 |
| +25% Cutoff | 20 | 375 | 18 | 2 | 90 |
| +50% Cutoff | 40 | 452 | 40 | 0 | 100 |
| +75% Cutoff | 20 | 526 | 20 | 0 | 100 |
Lay-users were also given surveys on the ease of understanding the package insert instructions. All lay users indicated that the device instructions can be easily followed. A Flesch-Kincaid reading analysis was performed on each package insert and the scores revealed a reading Grade Level of 7.
-
- Clinical Studies
Not applicable.
- Clinical Studies
11. Conclusion
Based on the test principle and acceptable performance characteristics including precision, cut-off, interference, specificity, method comparison, and lay-user studies of the devices, it's concluded that the SAFECARE® Dip Card Tests and SAFECARE® Cup Tests are substantially equivalent to the predicate.
§ 862.3100 Amphetamine test system.
(a)
Identification. An amphetamine test system is a device intended to measure amphetamine, a central nervous system stimulating drug, in plasma and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of amphetamine use or overdose and in monitoring levels of amphetamine to ensure appropriate therapy.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). An amphetamine test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (e.g., programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).