(364 days)
Mirus™ Circular Stapler has application throughout the alimentary tract for end to end, end to side and side to side anastomoses.
Mirus™ Linear Cutter and Reload have application in gastrointestinal, gynecologic, thoracic, and pediatric surgery for transection, resection, and/or creation of anastomoses.
Mirus™ Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler has application throughout the anal canal to perform surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.
Mirus™ Linear Stapler and Reload has applications in abdominal, gynecological, pediatric and thoracic surgical procedures for resection or transection of tissue and creation of anastomosis, including occlusion of the left atrial appendage in open procedures.
The Mirus™ Circular Stapler are sterile, single use devices that simultaneously staple and cut tissue to create an anastomosis. The devices deliver double staggered concentric rows of staples on the outside of the cut line. The circular stapler is available in diameter of the staple line from 24mm, 25mm, 26mm, 29mm, 32mm or 34mm stapler. The device has a detachable anvil that allows the surgeon to place the anvil in the desired location. Mirus™ Circular Stapler is preloaded with Staples.
Mirus™ Linear Cutter stapler and the Reload have two groups of staple lines in the target area, both of which are composed of a double row of titanium staples interlaced with each other and automatically cut the tissues between the two groups of staple lines when suturing. There are three suturing lengths of 60mm, 80mm and 100mm. The cartridge/ reload for Mirus™ Linear Cutter are supplied separately.
Mirus™ Hemorrhoids Circular Stapler is a set of instruments that places a circular row of titanium staples (double staggered) while simultaneously resecting a segment of compressed soft tissue. The set is commonly used in the Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH). The set is also used for other applications where circular or semicircular stapling of anorectal tissue is desired. The Mirus™ Hemorrhoid circular stapler is preloaded with staples.
Mirus™ Linear Stapler places a double staggered row of titanium Staples. They are available in 30mm, 45mm, 60mm and 90mm staple line length. The cartridge/ reload for Mirus™ Linear stapler are supplied separately
This FDA 510(k) clearance document outlines the substantial equivalence of the "Mirus Family of Surgical Staplers" to predicate devices, thus it doesn't contain a detailed clinical study with specific acceptance criteria and performance metrics typically found for AI/ML devices.
However, based on the provided text, we can infer the types of acceptance criteria used for this medical device (surgical staplers) and the nature of the "study" (preclinical performance testing) that demonstrates these criteria are met.
Here's an analysis structured per your request, with the understanding that specific numerical performance metrics are not given for acceptance criteria in this document, but rather a qualitative assessment of equivalence.
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Criteria (Inferred from document) | Reported Device Performance (as stated in document) |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Performance | - Visual Appearance (absence of defects) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicates. |
| - Dimensional Measurement (conformance to specifications) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicates. | |
| - Open Staple Height (conformance to specifications) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicates. | |
| - Closed Staple Height (conformance to specifications) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicates. | |
| - Staple Formation Test (proper staple crimping) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicates. | |
| - Staple Line Integrity and Staple Formation (adequate sealing/closure) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicates. | |
| - Pressure Resistance Test (withstand internal pressure) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicates. | |
| - Force to Fire (ease of operation) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicates. | |
| Biocompatibility | Absence of adverse biological reactions (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, hemolysis, genotoxicity, subchronic systemic toxicity, implantation effects) | All identified tests were performed and met the requirements outlined in ISO 10993-1 and FDA guidance. |
| Sterilization | Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10^-6 | Validated as per ISO 11135 using an overkill (half-cycle) method. EtO residuals met ISO 10993-7. |
| Packaging & Shelf Life | - Package integrity throughout shelf life | Validated as per ISO 11607. |
| - Shelf life validity | Validated as per ICH Q1A (R2) & ISO 11607. | |
| - Performance of aged samples | Performance testing on aged samples demonstrated continued satisfactory operation. | |
| - Ability to withstand transportation stresses | Transportation Study as per ASTM D 999 & ASTM D 5276 was conducted. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document does not specify exact sample sizes for each performance test. It states "Simulated use testing was performed utilizing each device of the Mirus™ family of surgical staplers," implying that representative samples of each stapler type were tested.
- Test Set Sample Size: Not explicitly stated numerically for each test. Implied to be representative samples of each of the four device types (Circular, Linear Cutter, Hemorrhoidal Circular, Linear Stapler).
- Data Provenance: Preclinical / bench testing data generated by the manufacturer (M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited). The document does not specify country of origin for the test data generation itself, but the manufacturer is based in Gujarat, India. This generally implies retrospective testing performed to support the 510(k) submission.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This type of information is not applicable to this document. The "ground truth" for mechanical device performance tests is based on objective measurements against engineering specifications and international standards (e.g., staple height measurements, force measurements, chemical analyses for biocompatibility). It does not involve human expert interpretation in the same way an AI/ML diagnostic device would.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
This is not applicable as it refers to a consensus method for expert review, which is not relevant for preclinical mechanical performance and biocompatibility testing of this nature. All tests were conducted against pre-defined, objective criteria in relevant standards.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This is not applicable. This document describes the clearance of surgical staplers, which are mechanical medical devices, not AI/ML-assisted diagnostic tools. Therefore, MRMC studies and "human readers" interpreting AI output are not relevant.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This is not applicable as the device is a mechanical surgical stapler, not an algorithm or AI product.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The "ground truth" for the preclinical performance tests is established by:
- Engineering specifications for dimensional, force, and staple formation characteristics.
- International standards (e.g., ISO 10993 series for biocompatibility, ISO 11135 for sterilization, ISO 11607 for packaging) which define acceptable limits and testing methodologies.
8. The sample size for the training set
This is not applicable. As a mechanical device, there is no "training set" in the context of machine learning. The device is manufactured based on design specifications.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This is not applicable for the same reason as above. There is no training set for this type of device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
February 5, 2021
M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited Umesh Sharma General Manager, Ouality Assurance/Regulatory Affairs Third Floor, E1-E3, Meril Park Survey No. 135/2/B & 174/2, Muktanand Marg Chala, Vapi - 396191 Gujarat, India
Re: K200320
Trade/Device Name: Mirus Circular Stapler, Mirus Linear Cutter and Reload, Mirus Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler, Mirus Linear Stapler and Reload
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4750 Regulation Name: Implantable Staple Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GDW Dated: January 2, 2021 Received: January 7, 2021
Dear Umesh Sharma:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrl/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance)and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
For
Cindy Chowdhury, Ph.D., M.B.A. Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K200320
Device Name
Mirus™ Circular Stapler, Mirus™ Linear Cutter and Reload, Mirus™ Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler and Reload.
Indications for Use (Describe)
Mirus™ Circular Stapler has application throughout the alimentary tract for end to side and side to side anastomoses.
Mirus™ Linear Cutter and Reload have application in gastrointestinal, gynecologic, thoracic, and pediatric surgery for transection, resection, and/or creation of anastomoses.
Mirus™ Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler has application throughout the anal to perform surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.
Mirus™ Linear Stapler and Reload has applications in abdominal, gynecological, pediatric and thoracic surgical procedures for resection or transection of tissue and creation of anastomosis, including occlusion of the left atrial appendage in open procedures.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|---|---|
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the word "Meril" in a sans-serif font. The word is white and is set against a blue background. There is a yellow dot above the "i" in "Meril", which is slightly offset to the right.
l. Submitter
M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited Third Floor, E1 - E3, Meril Park, Survey No. 135/2/B & 174/2, Muktanand Marg, Chala, Vapi – 396191 Gujarat, India.
Tel. No: +91-260-3052100, Fax: +91-260-3052125 Contact Person: Umesh Sharma E-mail: umesh.sharma@merillife.com Web site: www.merillife.com
Date Prepared: February 5th, 2021
II. Device
| Trade Name | Mirus™ Family of Surgical Staplers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| • Mirus™ Circular Stapler | ||||
| • Mirus™ Linear Cutter and Reload | ||||
| • Mirus™ Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler | ||||
| • Mirus™ Linear Stapler and Reload | ||||
| Panel | General and Plastic Surgery | |||
| Common/ Usual Name | Reload | Stapler | ||
| Classification Name | Implantable Staple | Stapler, surgical | ||
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 878.4750 | 21 CFR 878.4800 | ||
| Classification | Class II | Class I | ||
| Product Code | GDW | GAG |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the word "Meril" in white font against a blue background. The "i" in Meril has a yellow dot above it. The font is sans-serif and appears to be modern and clean. The overall design is simple and professional.
III. Predicate Device
| Subject device | Predicate device | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Trade Name | Manufacturer | 510 (K) No. | |
| Mirus™ Circular Stapler | Single Use Circular Stapler | ||
| Mirus™ Linear Cutter and Reload | Single Patient Use Linear Cutter and Reload | Golden Stapler Surgical Co., Ltd. | K162707 |
| Mirus™ Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler | Single Use Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler | ||
| Mirus™ Linear Stapler and Reload | Single Patient Use Linear Stapler and Reload |
IV. Device Description
1. The Mirus™ Circular Stapler
The Mirus™ Circular Stapler are sterile, single use devices that simultaneously staple and cut tissue to create an anastomosis. The devices deliver double staggered concentric rows of staples on the outside of the cut line. The circular stapler is available in diameter of the staple line from 24mm, 25mm, 26mm, 29mm, 32mm or 34mm stapler. The device has a detachable anvil that allows the surgeon to place the anvil in the desired location. Mirus™ Circular Stapler is preloaded with Staples.
2. Mirus™ Linear Cutter and reload
Mirus™ Linear Cutter stapler and the Reload have two groups of staple lines in the target area, both of which are composed of a double row of titanium staples interlaced with each other and automatically cut the tissues between the two groups of staple lines when suturing. There are three suturing lengths of 60mm, 80mm and 100mm. The cartridge/ reload for Mirus™ Linear Cutter are supplied separately.
{5}------------------------------------------------
3. Mirus™ Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler
Mirus™ Hemorrhoids Circular Stapler is a set of instruments that places a circular row of titanium staples (double staggered) while simultaneously resecting a segment of compressed soft tissue. The set is commonly used in the Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH). The set is also used for other applications where circular or semicircular stapling of anorectal tissue is desired. The Mirus™ Hemorrhoid circular stapler is preloaded with staples.
4. Mirus™ Linear Stapler and reload
Mirus™ Linear Stapler places a double staggered row of titanium Staples. They are available in 30mm, 45mm, 60mm and 90mm staple line length. The cartridge/ reload for Mirus™ Linear stapler are supplied separately
V. Intended Use
-
- Mirus™ Circular Stapler has application throughout the alimentary tract for end to end, end to side and side to side anastomoses.
-
- Mirus™ Linear Cutter and Reload have application in gastrointestinal, gynecologic, thoracic, and pediatric surgery for transection, resection, and/or creation of anastomoses.
-
- Mirus™ Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler has application throughout the anal canal to perform surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.
-
- Mirus™ Linear Stapler and Reload has applications in abdominal, gynecological, pediatric and thoracic surgical procedures for resection or transection of tissue and creation of anastomosis, including occlusion of the left atrial appendage in open procedures.
{6}------------------------------------------------
VI. Substantial Equivalence
The Mirus™ family of Surgical Staplers is substantially equivalent to marketed predicate devices with respect to intended use and technological characteristics. The Mirus™ family of Surgical Staplers operates on the same principle as predicate devices. The results demonstrated that the subject devices are as safe and as effective as the predicates.
-
- Intended Use
-
- Principle of Operation
-
- Product design
-
- Sterilization
-
- Packaging
-
- Safety Mechanism
-
- Biocompatibility
VII. Preclinical Data
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
Performance Tests
Simulated use testing was performed utilizing each device of the Mirus™ family of surgical staplers. The following testing demonstrated that subject devices substantially equivalent to the predicates.
- . Visual Inspection
- . Dimensional Measurement
- Open Staple Height
- Closed Staple Height
- Staple Formation Test
- Staple Line Integrity and Staple Formation ●
- Pressure Resistance Test
- Force to fire ●
{7}------------------------------------------------
Biocompatibility
The biocompatibility evaluation for Mirus™ Family of Surgical Staplers was conducted in accordance with FDA Biocompatibility Guidance Document "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" June 2016 and International Standards ISO 10993-1 "Biological evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" as recognized by FDA.
Based on attachment A (Table A.1) of the FDA guidance, following tests were identified and performed
- In vitro cytotoxicity test .
- Skin sensitization test .
- Intracutaneous reactivity test .
- . Acute systemic toxicity test
- Material mediated pyrogen test ●
- Hemolysis test .
- Genotoxicity test .
- Subchronic systemic toxicity test .
- . Intramuscular implantation test
Sterilisation
Mirus™ Family of Surgical Staplers are sterilized by Ethylene Oxide (EtO). The Ethylene oxide sterilization process is validated as per ISO 11135. The method used for ethylene oxide sterilization was overkill (half-cycle approach) method in a fixed chamber. Ethylene oxide residuals were tested and met ISO 10993-7 requirements.
The sterilization processes have demonstrated a sterility assurance level of 10-6
{8}------------------------------------------------
Packaging & Shelf life
The Following packaging and shelf life study was conducted to ensure package integrity throughout the shelf life.
- Packaging validation as per ISO 11607 .
- . Shelf life validation as per ICH Q1A (R2) & ISO 11607
- . Performance testing on aged sample (Stability testing).
- . Transportation Study as per ASTM D 999 & ASTM D 5276
Conclusion VIII.
Mirus™ family of surgical staplers is substantially equivalent to currently marketed devices and presents no substantial differences in design, intended use, function and technological characteristics to predicate device.
The performance, biocompatibility, sterilization, packaging and shelf life study conducted on Mirus™ family of surgical staplers demonstrated its safety and performance as predicate device.
Hence, Mirus™ family of surgical staplers will perform as intended in the specified use conditions.
§ 878.4750 Implantable staple.
(a)
Identification. An implantable staple is a staple-like device intended to connect internal tissues to aid healing. It is not absorbable.(b)
Classification. Class II.