(261 days)
TaiChiA, is a Medical Linear Accelerator intended to provide stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation treatment is indicated.
TaiChiA Medical Linear Accelerator, has been designed to deliver radiation treatment in accordance with a prescribed plan. This system utilizes kV image guidance technology (IGRT) to deliver photon based radiation therapy treatments, using an integrated rotating linear accelerator system. TaiChiA is a single energy medical linear accelerator designed to deliver Image Guided Radiation Therapy and Radiosurgery, using 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT techniques. It consists of the accelerator and patient support within a radiation shielded treatment room and a control console in the control room.
The provided text does not contain explicit acceptance criteria and device performance in a table format, nor does it detail a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria using statistical measures (sensitivity, specificity, etc.) typically associated with AI/ML performance. The document describes a medical linear accelerator (TaiChiA) and compares its specifications to predicate and reference devices in tables, asserting substantial equivalence. It confirms various verification and validation tests were performed (electrical safety, EMC, bench tests, hardware/software) to show compliance with relevant standards and specifications.
However, based on the provided text, I can extract and infer information about the device's specifications and the type of testing performed for its regulatory clearance.
Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided document:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not provide a formal table of "acceptance criteria" against which specific "device performance" metrics (like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity for an AI component) are reported. Instead, it presents detailed comparative tables of the TaiChiA's specifications against a predicate device (Varian Halcyon, K181032) and a reference device (Varian TrueBeam, K171733). The "acceptance criteria" here are implicitly the demonstrated equivalence or comparable performance to these legally marketed devices across various physical and functional attributes. The "reported device performance" is the TaiChiA's specifications as listed in these comparison tables.
Below is a summary of key comparative specifications. These essentially serve as the "performance" metrics evaluated for substantial equivalence.
| Attribute/Feature | Predicate Device (Varian Halcyon, K181032) | Proposed Device (TaiChiA Medical Linear Accelerator) | Reference Device (TrueBeam, K171733) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beam Specification | |||
| Beam energy (MV) | 6MV, FFF | 6MV, FFF | 6/8/10/15/18/20MV (FF), 6/10MV (FFF). (TaiChiA 6MV FFF) |
| Maximum dose rate (cGy/min) | Up to 800 | Up to 1400 | Up to 1400 (6MV FFF) |
| Maximum treatment field (cm) | 28x28 | 40x40 | 40x40 |
| Dmax (cm) | 1.3 +/- 0.2 | 1.5 +/- 0.2 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Percentage dose at 10 cm depth (%) | 63.0 +/- 1.0 | 65.0 +/- 2.0 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Off axis intensity (%) | 79.0 +/- 2.0 | 76.0 +/- 2.0 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Symmetry (%) | <= 2.0 | <= 3.0 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Dosimetry Specifications | |||
| Dose output vs. Total MU requested | 1.0% or 1.0 MU whichever is greater | 2% | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Dose output constancy vs gantry angle (%) | +/- 1.0 | +/- 1.0 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Dose Monitoring System Proportionality | Not explicitly listed in Halcyon comparison | Not explicitly listed in Halcyon comparison | +/- 1% |
| Geometric Specifications | |||
| Gantry rotation range (degrees) | +/- 185 | No limit (continuous rotation) | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Collimator rotation range (degrees) | +/- 90 | +/- 90 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Source to axis distance (cm) | 100 | 100 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Radiation isocenter size (mm) | <= 0.90 | <= 1.0 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Gantry maximum rotational speed (RPM) | Up to 4.0 | Up to 1.0 | Up to 1.0 |
| Collimator maximum rotation speed (RPM) | Up to 2.5 | Up to 1.0 | Up to 1.0 |
| Beam Shaping Specifications | |||
| Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) | Two layers opposed leaf banks | Single layer opposed leaf banks | Single layer opposed leaf banks |
| Maximum leaf speed (cm/sec) | Up to 5.0 | Up to 2.5 | Up to 2.5 |
| Number of MLC leaves | 114 (in two layers) | 120 | 120 |
| Leaf resolution at isoplane (cm) | 1.0 | 0.5 and 1.0 | 0.5 and 1.0 |
| Average leaf transmission (%) | <= 0.01 | <= 1.0 | <= 2.0 |
| Couch Specifications | |||
| Shift positioning accuracy (cm) | <= 0.05 | <= 0.05 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| Imaging Specifications | |||
| Imaging beam | MV | kV | kV |
| Imaging field of view (cm) | 28.0 x 28.0 | phi 25.0 (head), phi 44.5 (body) | phi 25.0 (head), phi 46.0 (body) |
| Image and treatment coincidence (cm) | <= 0.1 | <= 0.1 | Not explicitly listed in TrueBeam comparison |
| CBCT acquisition mode (pixels/degrees) | 256x256 / 200 | 512x512 / 200 (head) or 360 (body) | 512x512 / 200 (head) or 360 (body) |
| Dose per orthogonality imaging acquisition | 2 or 4MU (MV-MV) | <0.1cGy (kV-kV) | <0.1cGy (kV-kV) |
| Dose per CBCT acquisition | 5 or 10 (cGy) | <1.0cGy | <1.4cGy |
The study described is essentially the collection of various tests and comparisons to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices, thus meeting regulatory acceptance for market clearance.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document discusses "bench tests" and "hardware and software verification and validation testing" according to various international standards (IEC, ISO). However, it does not specify sample sizes for these tests in terms of patient data or a specific number of testing scenarios. The nature of these tests are for device performance and safety, not for diagnostic accuracy on a clinical dataset. The data provenance is not specified beyond the device being manufactured by "OUR UNITED CORPORATION" in Xi'an, China. It appears to be device-level testing rather than clinical study data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This information is not provided. The tests described are engineering and regulatory compliance tests, not clinical performance evaluations requiring expert-established ground truth on patient data.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This information is not provided as the described tests do not involve human adjudication of clinical outcomes or images.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. The device is a medical linear accelerator for radiation therapy, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
This refers to a standalone performance of an AI algorithm. The device, TaiChiA, is a physical medical linear accelerator, not an AI algorithm for image analysis or diagnosis. Therefore, this question is not applicable in this context. The document describes traditional device verification and validation.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
For the described bench tests, electrical safety, EMC, and hardware/software verification, the "ground truth" would be the specifications and requirements defined by the relevant international standards (e.g., IEC 60601 series, IEC 61217, ISO 13485) and the device's design specifications. There's no mention of clinical ground truth (like pathology or outcomes data) as this is not a diagnostic device evaluated for disease detection.
8. The sample size for the training set
This information is not provided and would not be relevant for a physical medical device like a linear accelerator in the context of its regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence. This question typically applies to AI/ML software.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This information is not provided and is not applicable for the type of device and regulatory submission described.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Our United Corporation % Qi Liu Regulatory Affairs Engineer 3rd Floor, Unit 1, Block 28 ShouChuang International Business Center, NO.66 Xi'an. Shaan xi 710018 CHINA
August 7, 2020
Re: K193207
Trade/Device Name: TaiChiA Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5050 Regulation Name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: IYE Dated: July 5, 2020 Received: July 10, 2020
Dear Qi Liu:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
For
Thalia T. Mills, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K193207
Device Name TaiChiA
Indications for Use (Describe)
TaiChiA, is a Medical Linear Accelerator intended to provide stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors,and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation treatment is indicated.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable):
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
|---|
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Premarket Notification [510(k)] Summary OUR UNITED CORPORATION TaiChiA Medical Linear Accelerator
The following information is provided following the format of 21 CFR 807.92. I.GENERAL INFORMATION
| Date Prepared: | July 5th 2020 |
|---|---|
| Submitter's Name: | OUR UNITED CORPORATION3rd Floor, Unit 1, Block 28, ShouChuang International BusinessCenter, No.66, Fengcheng 12 Road, Weiyang District, Xi'anCity, Shaanxi Province, China. |
| Contact Person: | Qi LiuPhone: +86 15389012257Email: qi.liu@ourunited.com |
| II.DEVICEINFORMATION | |
| Proprietary Name: | TaiChiA |
| Classification Name: | Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system |
| Device Regulation: | 21 CFR 892.5050 |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | IYE |
| Common/Usual Name: | Medical Linear Accelerator |
| III.PREDICATEDEVICE | Varian Medical Systems Halcyon (K181032) |
| Reference Device | TrueBeam, TrueBeam STx, and Edge Radiotherapy DeliverySystem (K171733) |
| IV. Device Description: | TaiChiA Medical Linear Accelerator, has been designed todeliver radiation treatment in accordance with a prescribed plan.This system utilizes kV image guidance technology (IGRT) todeliver photon based radiation therapy treatments, using anintegrated rotating linear accelerator system. |
| TaiChiA is a single energy medical linear accelerator designed todeliver Image Guided Radiation Therapy and Radiosurgery,using 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT techniques. It consists of theaccelerator and patient support within a radiation shieldedtreatment room and a control console in the control room. | |
| V. Intended Use: | TaiChiA, is a Medical Linear Accelerator intended to providestereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions,tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiationtreatment is indicated. |
| VI. Indications for Use: | TaiChiA, is a Medical Linear Accelerator intended to providestereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions.tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation |
{4}------------------------------------------------
VII. COMPARISION WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
treatment is indicated.
The Halcyon system (K181032) from Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (Palo Alto, CA) is selected as the primary predicate device of the TaiChiA system from OUR United Corporation (Xi'an, China) because of their similarities. Both devices have the same general intended use and indications for use, i.e., provide stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation treatment is indicated. The two systems have similar major components and comparable specifications that include beam energy, Dmax, depth dose at 10cm, symmetry, off axis intensity, dose output and constancy, collimator rotation, target to gantry axis distance, bore diameter, radiation isocenter size, maximum leaf over travel, leaf interdigitating, leaf end position accuracy, low MLC leakage, shift positioning accuracy and degrees of freedom.
The two systems have few different specifications on beam collimation, maximum dose rate, imaging system, gantry rotation and couch. Regarding beam collimation, TaiChiA is equipped with a single layer MLC with a maximum leaf speed of 2.5cm/s and maximum field size of 40cm, while Halcyon has a double layer MLC with maximum leaf speed of 5.0cm/s and maximum field size of 28cm x 28cm. Halcyon supports a faster MLC leaf speed but has a smaller treatment field size. Compared to Halcyon, TaiChiA has a higher maximum dose rate (1400cGy/min vs. 800cGy/min) which can improve treatment efficiency. Regarding gantry rotations, based on slip-ring technology, TaiChiA can rotate the gantry continuously, while Halcyon is limited to +/- 185 degrees from the nominal angle with a state of zero degree, but has a faster maximum rotation speed. While both systems have a treatment couch weight specification which supports 95% of the patient population, Halcyon has a higher supported maximum weight limit. Due to the differences of isocenter height and gantry structure, TaiChiA has different couch travel range than Halcyon, but both systems meet the clinical coverage requirements of all standard treatment types.
As TaiChiA has some appreciable differences with Halcyon regarding the maximum dose rate, the beam collimation system, and the imaging system, the Varian TrueBeam system (K171733) is selected as the reference device for comparisons with TaiChiA. The TrueBeam system just like TaiChiA has an identical intended use, a 6MV FFF beam with maximum dose rate of 1400cGy/min, and is equipped with a single layer MLC system with 2.5cm/s maximum leaf speed and a maximum field size of 40cm x 40cm, and kV imaging capabilities.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The above-mentioned differences between TaiChiA and Halcyon have been verified and validated. It is demonstrated that these differences do not affect the TaiChiA's safety and effectiveness for patient treatment. The TaiChiA system is as safe and effective as the predicate device.
Detailed comparisons of TaiChiA with Halcyon (the predicate device) and TrueBeam (the reference device) are provided in the following tables, respectively.
| NO. | Attribute/Feature | Predicate DeviceVarian Halcyon (K181032) | Proposed DeviceTaiChiA Medical LinearAccelerator |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Information | |||
| 1 | Intended Use | The Halcyon radiotherapy delivery system is intended to provide stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation treatment is indicated. | TaiChiA, is a Medical Linear Accelerator, intended to provide stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation treatment is indicated. |
| 2 | Indications for Use | Halcyon is indicated for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation is indicated for adults and pediatric patients. | TaiChiA, is a Medical Linear Accelerator, intended to provide stereotactic radiosurgery and precision radiotherapy for lesions, tumors, and conditions anywhere in the body where radiation treatment is indicated. |
| Beam Specification | |||
| 3 | Beam energy (MV) | 6MV, FFF | 6MV, FFF |
| 4 | Maximum dose rate (cGy/min) | Up to 800 | Up to 1400 |
| 5 | Maximum treatment field (cm) | 28×28 | 40×40 |
| 6 | Dmax (cm) | $1.3\pm0.2$ | $1.5\pm0.2$ |
| 7 | Percentage dose at 10 cm depth (%) | $63.0\pm1.0$ | $65.0 \pm 2.0$ |
| 8 | Off axis intensity (%) | $79.0\pm2.0$ | $76.0 \pm 2.0$ |
| 9 | Symmetry (%) | $\le2.0$ | $\le3.0$ |
| Dosimetry Specifications | |||
| 10 | Dose output vs. Total MU requested | 1.0% or 1.0 MU whichever is greater | 2% |
| 11 | Dose output constancy vs gantry angle (%) | $\pm 1.0$ | $\pm 1.0$ |
| Geometric Specifications | |||
| 12 | Gantry rotation range (degrees) | $\pm 185$ | No limit (continuous rotation) |
| 13 | Collimator rotationrange (degrees) | $\pm$ 90 | $\pm$ 90 |
| 14 | Source to axisdistance (cm) | 100 | 100 |
| 15 | Isocenter heightrelative to the floor(cm) | 110 | 95 |
| 16 | Bore Diameter (cm) | 100 | 95 |
| 17 | Radiation isocentersize (mm) | $\le$ 0.90 | $\le$ 1.0 |
| 18 | Gantry maximumrotational speed(RPM) | Up to 4.0 | Up to 1.0 |
| 19 | Collimatormaximum rotationspeed (RPM) | Up to 2.5 | Up to 1.0 |
| Beam Shaping Specifications | |||
| 20 | Multi-LeafCollimator (MLC) | Two layers opposed leaf banks | Single layer opposed leaf banks |
| 21 | Maximum leafspeed (cm/sec) | Up to 5.0 | Up to 2.5 |
| 22 | Number of MLCleaves | 114 (in two layers) | 120 |
| 23 | Leaf resolution atisoplane (cm) | 1.0 | 0.5 and 1.0 |
| 24 | Maximum leaf overtravel (cm) | 14.0 | 16.0 |
| 25 | Leaf interdigitating | Yes | Yes |
| 26 | Leaf end positionaccuracy (cm) | $\pm$ 0.1 | $\pm$ 0.1 |
| 27 | Average leaftransmission (%) | $\le$ 0.01 | $\le$ 1.0 |
| Couch Specifications | |||
| 28 | Weight limit withIGRT couch top(kg) | 228 | 135 |
| 29 | Shift positioningaccuracy (cm) | $\le$ 0.05 | $\le$ 0.05 |
| 30 | Degrees of freedom | 3 | 3 |
| 31 | Lateral travel range(cm) | $\pm$ 20.8 | $\pm$ 15.0 |
| 32 | Vertical travelrange (cm) | -47.5 to 0.0 | -28.0 to 10.0 |
| 33 | Longitudinal travelrange (cm) | 165.5 | 180.0 |
| Imaging Specifications | |||
| 34 | Imaging beam | MV | kV |
| 35 | Imaging field of | $28.0 \times 28.0$ | $\phi$ 25.0 for head scan |
| view (cm) | $\phi$ 44.5 for body scan | ||
| 36 | Imageand | $\leq$ 0.1 | $\leq$ 0.1 |
| treatment | |||
| coincidence (cm) | |||
| 37 | CBCT acquisition | 256 x 256 reconstruction matrix / | 512 $\times$ 512 reconstruction matrix/ |
| mode | 200 | 200 (head) or 360 (body) | |
| (pixels/degrees) | |||
| 38 | Dose per | 2 or 4MU (cGy) | <0.1cGy |
| orthogonality | MV-MV | kV-kV | |
| imaging acquisition | |||
| 39 | Dose per CBCT | 5 or 10 (cGy) | <1.0cGy |
| acquisition | |||
| Treatment Delivery and Imaging Acquisition Specifications | |||
| 40 | Imaging techniques | MV CBCT (3D) or MV/MV (2D) | kV CBCT (3D) or kV/kV (2D) |
| 41 | Treatment delivery | 3D, 3DCRT Field in Field, | 3DCRT, IMRT, VMAT |
| techniques | IMRT/IMRS, RapidArc and | ||
| VMAT |
Comparisons of TaiChiA with Halcyon (Predicate Device)
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
Comparisons of TaiChiA with TrueBeam (Reference device)
| NO. | Attribute/Feature | Reference DeviceTrueBeam (K171733) | Proposed DeviceTaiChiA Medical Linear Accelerator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Rate, Field size, MLC and Gantry, Collimator rotation speed | |||
| 1 | Beam energy(MV) | 6/8/10/15/18/20MV with FF6/10MV with FFF6MV with FFF is one ofTrueBeam's beam energy | 6MV with FFF |
| 2 | Maximum doserate (cGy/min) | Up to 1400with FFF at 6MV beam | Up to 1400with FFF at 6MV beam |
| 3 | Dose MonitoringSystemProportionality | $\pm$ 1% | 2% |
| 4 | Maximumtreatment field(cm) | 40×40 | 40×40 |
| 5 | Multi-LeafCollimator (MLC) | Single layer opposed leaf banks | Single layer opposed leaf banks |
| 6 | Maximum leafspeed (cm/sec) | Up to 2.5 | Up to 2.5 |
| 7 | Leaf resolution atisoplane (cm) | 0.5 and 1.0 | 0.5 and 1.0 |
| 8 | Number of MLCleaves | 120 | 120 |
| 9 | Average leaftransmission (%) | $\leq$ 2.0 | $\leq$ 1.0 |
| 10 | Gantry maximum | Up to 1.0 | Up to 1.0 |
{8}------------------------------------------------
| rotational speed(RPM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Collimatormaximum rotationspeed (RPM) | Up to 1.0 | Up to 1.0 |
| Imaging Specifications | |||
| 12 | Imagingtechniques | kV CBCT or kV/kV | kV CBCT or kV/kV |
| 13 | Imaging beam | kV | kV |
| 14 | Imaging field ofview (cm) | $\phi$ 25.0 for head scan$\phi$ 46.0 for body scan | $\phi$ 25.0 for head scan$\phi$ 44.5 for body scan |
| 15 | Imaginglength(cm) | 17.0 for head scan15.5 for body scan | 17.0 for head scan19.0 for body scan |
| 16 | CBCT acquisitionmode(pixels/degrees) | 512×512 reconstruction matrix/200 (head) or 360 (body) | 512×512 reconstruction matrix/200 (head) or 360 (body) |
| 17 | Dose perorthogonalityimagingacquisition | <0.1cGykV-kV | <0.1cGykV-kV |
| 18 | Dose per CBCTacquisition | <1.4cGy | <1.0cGy |
VIII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence:
Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)
Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing were conducted on this medical device. The system complies with the IEC 60601-1Medical Electrical Equipment - Part I General requirements for basic safety and essential performance for the safety and the IEC 60601-1-2 Medical electrical equipment Part 1-2 General requirements for basic safety and essential performance -Collateral standard Electromagnetic compatibility-Requirements and tests for EMC.
Bench Test
Successful testings were performed in accordance with following standards:
IEC60601-2-1:2005, Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-1: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of electron accelerators in the range 1 MeV to 50 MeV
IEC60601-1-3:2013, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-3: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray equipment
{9}------------------------------------------------
IEC60601-2-68:2014. Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-68: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray-based image-guided radiotherapy equipment for use with electron accelerators, light ion beam therapy equipment and radionuclide beam therapy equipment
IEC61217:2011, Radiotherapy equipment - Coordinates, movements and scales
IEC62274 :2005. Medical electrical equipment - Safety of radiotherapy record and verify systems
IEC62366-1:2015, Medical devices - Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices
IEC60601-1-6:2013, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-6: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: Usability
IEC60976:2007, Medical electrical equipment Medical electron accelators - Functional performance characteristics
RT2:2017 Radiation therapy readiness check
ISO 15223-1: 2016, Medical devices - Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labelling, and information to be supplied - Part 1: General requirements
ISO10993-1:2009. Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
Hardware and Software Verification and Validation Testing
Hardware and software verification and validation process were conducted according to the FDA Quality System Regulation (21 CFR §820), ISO 13485 Quality Management System standard, ISO 14971 Risk Management Standard and the other FDA recognized consensus standards.
Test results showed conformance to applicable requirements specifications and assured hazard safeguards functioned properly. Software verification testing were conducted, and documentation was provided as recommended by FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices." The software for this device was considered as a "major" level of concern.
Animal or clinical test
Not applicable for TaiChiA
Summarv
The verification and validation testing demonstrated that TaiChiA has met its specifications, demonstrated substantially equivalent performance to the predicate device and met its intended use.
IX. CONCLUSIONS
The TaiChiA has the same intended use, fundamental scientific technology and principles of operation as the predicate device.
{10}------------------------------------------------
The differences between TaiChiA and predicate device do not raise any new safety or effectiveness issues. The differences are substantial equivalent to the reference device.
The Verification and Validation demonstrate that the device is as safe and effective as the predicate. OUR therefore believes that TaiChiA is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
§ 892.5050 Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system.
(a)
Identification. A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II. When intended for use as a quality control system, the film dosimetry system (film scanning system) included as an accessory to the device described in paragraph (a) of this section, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.