(252 days)
The red light is intended for the treatment of periorbital wrinkles and the blue light is intended for the treatment of the mild to moderate inflammatory acne. The device is indicated for adults only.
The LED THERAPY DEVICE is a facemask-shaped device, which directly applies light onto the face skin surface and makes use of specific light spectral characteristics. The proposed device has total of 150 LEDs and operates in two modes. One mode emits blue light with wavelengths centered at 415nm ±5nm, and the other mode emits red light with wavelengths centered at 630nm ±5nm. The red light is intended for the treatment of wrinkles. The blue light is intended for the treatment of the mild to moderate inflammatory acne. The blue light mode has ten level energy output settings, 5mw/cm2-50mw/cm2. The red light mode has ten level energy output settings, 8mw/cm2-80mw/cm2. The user can change the treatment mode according to their own needs. The LED THERAPY DEVICE is powered via a plug-in power adapter.
The provided document is a 510(k) Summary for an LED Therapy Device. It does not describe an acceptance criteria table with reported device performance in the typical sense of a clinical or performance study for a diagnostic AI device. Instead, it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through technical comparisons and non-clinical testing for safety and usability.
However, I can extract information related to the device's "performance" in the context of its regulatory submission and translate usability study results into a format that approximates acceptance criteria and reported performance metrics.
Here's an attempt to structure the information based on your request, with the understanding that the "device performance" in this context primarily relates to usability and safety, not diagnostic accuracy:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
For this device, "performance" is primarily assessed through usability and safety testing, as no clinical efficacy study was conducted for the 510(k) submission. The acceptance criteria are derived from the usability study's goals.
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Usability: Questionnaire Score | |
| - Overall subject score ≥ 95% in understanding the device. | 100% overall subject score in understanding of the device. |
| - 100% of questions related to Risks, Warnings, Cautions, Precautions, and other important Instruction Manual data correctly answered. | 100% of each question relating to Risks, Warnings, Cautions, Precautions, and other important data from the Instruction Manual, correctly answered. |
| - Participant overall score ≥ 95% based on correct answers to questionnaire. | 100% participant overall score achieved, with 100% of each question correctly answered. |
| Usability: Operation Demonstration | |
| - Participant overall score ≥ 95% in demonstrating correct device operation. | 100% of participants were able to correctly demonstrate: - How to install the device. - Perform the Light Sensitivity Test. - Operate the device. - Clean & disinfect the device. An overall subject score of 100% was achieved. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size for Usability Test Set: 45 end-users.
- 15 participants with mild inflammatory acne.
- 15 participants with moderate inflammatory acne.
- 15 participants with periorbital wrinkles.
- Data Provenance: Prospective study conducted in America (AD Precision Health storefront and office, Carrollton, TX).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts
This information is not provided in the document. The usability study ground truth was based on participants' ability to understand and operate the device correctly, rather than on expert medical assessment of outcomes.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not provided in the document. For the usability study, the "ground truth" (correctness of answers/demonstrations) would likely have been predefined by the study protocol, and scoring conducted against these predefined correct responses/actions. There's no indication of an adjudication panel.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done, If So, What was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs. Without AI Assistance
No. A MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This device is an LED therapy device, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool for human readers. No AI components are mentioned in the submission.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done
N/A. This is an LED therapy device, not an algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the usability study was based on:
- Correct responses to a questionnaire: Assessing user comprehension of instructions, risks, warnings, etc.
- Successful demonstration of predefined operational tasks: Such as installation, light sensitivity test, operation, cleaning, and disinfection.
For the substantial equivalence determination, the ground truth was also established by comparing the device's technical specifications and safety standards compliance to those of legally marketed predicate devices.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
There is no training set in the context of an AI/ML algorithm, as this is a physical LED therapy device. The non-clinical tests (biocompatibility, electrical safety, EMC, photobiological safety) would have been performed on a sample of the manufactured devices, but this is not a "training set" in the AI sense.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
N/A, as there is no training set for an AI/ML algorithm. For the non-clinical tests, the ground truth was established by internationally recognized standards (e.g., ISO, IEC) against which the device's performance was measured.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym with the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a square and the full name written out to the right of the square. The full name of the agency is "U.S. Food & Drug Administration".
Beijing ADSS Development Co., Ltd. % Ray Wang Official Correspondent Beijing Believe-Med Technology Service Co., Ltd. Rm.912, Building #15, XiYueHui, No.5, YiHe North Rd. FangShan District Beijing, 102401 China
Re: K192295
Trade/Device Name: LED Therapy Device Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4810 Regulation Name: Laser Surgical Instrument For Use In General And Plastic Surgery And In Dermatology Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLP, OHS Dated: March 6, 2020 Received: March 9, 2020
Dear Ray Wang:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Colin Kejing Chen Acting Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K192295
Device Name LED Therapy Device
Indications for Use (Describe)
The red light is intended for the treatment of periorbital wrinkles and the blue light is intended for the treatment of the mild to moderate inflammatory acne.
The device is indicated for adults only.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Tab #7 510(k) Summary
This 510(k) Summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of SMDA 1990 and Title 21, CFR Section 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) Number: K192295
-
- Date of Preparation
04/30/2020
- Date of Preparation
-
Sponsor 2.
Beijing ADSS Development Co., Ltd.
1-2, Jinyuan Road 36, Daxing Economic Development Zone, Beijing, 102628, P.R. China Contact Person: Su CuiYing Position: Registration Manager Tel: +86-10-83625120 Fax: +86-10-83625121 Email: 2693743771@qq.com
- Submission Correspondent 3.
Mr. Ray Wang Beijing Believe-Med Technology Service Co., Ltd. Rm.912, Building #15, XiYueHui, No.5, YiHe North Rd., FangShan District, BeiJing, China 102401 Tel: +86-18910677558 Fax: +86-10-56335780 Email: ray.wang@believe-med.com
{4}------------------------------------------------
4. Identification of Proposed Device
Trade Name: LED THERAPY DEVICE Model(s): LED THERAPY DEVICE
Regulatory Information:
Classification Name: Light Based Over-The-Counter Powered Light Based Laser For Acne/Light Based over the Counter Wrinkle Reduction Classification: 2; Product Code: OLP/OHS; Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4810; Review Panel: General & Plastic Surgery;
Intended Use Statement:
The red light is intended for the treatment of periorbital wrinkles and the blue light is intended for the treatment of the mild to moderate inflammatory acne. The device is indicated for adults only.
5. Device Description
The LED THERAPY DEVICE is a facemask-shaped device, which directly applies light onto the face skin surface and makes use of specific light spectral characteristics.
The proposed device has total of 150 LEDs and operates in two modes. One mode emits blue light with wavelengths centered at 415nm ±5nm, and the other mode emits red light with wavelengths centered at 630nm ±5nm.
The red light is intended for the treatment of wrinkles. The blue light is intended for the treatment of the mild to moderate inflammatory acne.
The blue light mode has ten level energy output settings, 5mw/cm2-50mw/cm2. The red light mode has ten level energy output settings, 8mw/cm2-80mw/cm2.
The user can change the treatment mode according to their own needs. The LED THERAPY DEVICE is powered via a plug-in power adapter.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Identification of Predicate Device 6.
Primary Predicate Device #1: 510(k) Number: K162098 Product Name: LED Phototherapy Device Manufacturer: Li-Tek Electronic Technology Corporation
Predicate Device #2: 510(k) Number: K172555 Product Name: Sapphire, Elevare Sapphire Manufacturer: Omm Imports, Inc. d/b/a Zero Gravity
7. Non-Clinical Test Conclusion
Non-clinical tests were conducted to verify that the proposed device met all design specifications. The test results demonstrated that the proposed device conforms to the following standards:
| No. | Standard Title | Year | RecognitionNumber |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | ISO 10993-5, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 5:Tests for In Vitro cytotoxicity | 2009 | 2-245 |
| 02 | ISO 10993-10, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization | 2010 | 2-174 |
| 03 | ANSI AAMI ES60601-1, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1:General requirements for basic safety and essentialperformance | 2005/(R)2012and A1:2012 | 19-4 |
| 04 | IEC 60601-1-2, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2:General requirements for basic safety and essentialperformance - Collateral Standard: Electromagneticdisturbances - Requirements and tests | 2014 | 19-8 |
| 05 | IEC 60601-1-11, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-11:General requirements for basic safety and essentialperformance - Collateral Standard: Requirements for medicalelectrical equipment and medical electrical systems used in thehome healthcare environment | 2015 | 19-14 |
| 06 | IEC 62471, Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems | 2006 | 12-249 |
| 07 | IEC 62366-1 Medical devices - Part 1: Application of usabilityengineering to medical devices | 2015 | 5-114 |
- Usability Study Summary
{6}------------------------------------------------
A Self-Selection, Labeling Comprehension, and Usability Study has been conducted for the LED THERAPY DEVICE.
The study was carried out from 2/17/2020 through 3/1/2020, at the AD Precision Health storefront and office, 2810 E Trinity Mills Rd #130, Carrollton TX 75006, America.
45 end-users enrolled for the study, which included 15 participants with mild inflammatory acne, 15 participants with moderate inflammatory acne, and 15 participants with periorbital wrinkles.
Results of Usability Study Questionnaire
The results from the questionnaire portion indicated an overall subject score of 100% in understanding of our device, with 100% of each question relating to Risks, Warnings, Cautions, Precautions and a variety of other important data from the Instruction Manual, being correctly answered. The results of this cohort found that an overall subject score of 100% was achieved, with 100% of each question correctly answered, thus reaching the goal of the question score ≥95% and the participant overall score ≥95%.
Results of Operation demonstration of the device
The results of this cohort found that 100% of the participants were able to:
-Correctly demonstrate how to install the device, perform the Light Sensitivity Test, operate the device, and clean & disinfect the device.
The results of this cohort found that an overall subject score of 100% was achieved. thus reaching the goal of Target Levels: Participant Overall score ≥95%. Conclusion:
According to the results of study, all participants who represented the intended user population of the LED THERAPY DEVICE, understood how to decide whether or not they should use the device, understood the instruction for use, and could operate the device successfully.
Clinical Test Conclusion 9.
No Clinical Test conducted.
{7}------------------------------------------------
10. Substantially Equivalent (SE) Comparison
| Table 1 General Comparison | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITEM | Proposed Device | Primary Predicate Device #1 | Predicate Device #2 | Remark |
| K162098 | K172555 | |||
| Product Code | OLP, OHS | OLP, OHS | OLP | SAME |
| Regulation No. | 21 CFR 878.4810 | 21 CFR 878.4810 | 21 CFR 878.4810 | SAME |
| Class | Class 2 | Class 2 | Class 2 | SAME |
| Intended Use | The red light is intended forthe treatment of periorbitalwrinkles and the blue light isintended for the treatment ofthe mild to moderateinflammatory acne.The device is indicated foradults only. | The red light is intended forthe treatment of periorbitalwrinkles, and the blue light isintended for the treatment ofthe mild to moderateinflammatory acne. | The SAPPHIRE is an over-the -counter hand held,battery operated, lighttherapy device that useslight emitting diodes(LEDs) that emit a specificwavelength of 415nm(Blue Light) that isintended for use in thetreatment of mild tomoderate inflammatoryacne. | SAME |
| Prescription/OTC | OTC | OTC | OTC | SAME |
Table 1 General Comparison
Table 2 Performance Comparison
| ITEM | Proposed Device | Primary Predicate Device #1K162098 | Predicate Device #2K172555 | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Source | 5.V DC 2.0 APowered by direct plug-inadapter: Input 100-240V AC,50/60 Hz, 0.5A Max., Output5.0V DC 2.0A | 3.7V 1050mAh Li battery | Not Available | DifferenceAnalysisas belowthe table |
| Software/Firmware/Microprocessor Control? | Yes | Yes | Yes | SAME |
| Power(mW/cm²) | Red light: 80±10%Blue light: 50±10% | Red light: 80±10%Blue light: 65±10% | Blue light: 50 | SAME |
| Wavelength | Blue light: 415nm±5nmRed light: 630nm±5nm | Blue light: 415nm±3nmRed light: 630nm±3nm | Blue light: 415nm±5nm | SAME |
| Handheld | Yes | Yes | Yes | SAME |
| TreatmentDuration | 3-5 minutes each time, twicea week | 3 minutes per targetarea; 2 treatments perweek for 6 weeks | 4 minutes per area, twiceper week for 4 weeks(total of 8 treatments) | SAME |
| Main Materials | PC+ABS | ABS plastic | Not Available | DifferenceAnalysis |
{8}------------------------------------------------
| as belowthe table | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| -- | -- | -- | ----------------------- |
| ITEM | Proposed Device | Primary Predicate Device #1 | Predicate Device #2 | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K162098 | K172555 | |||
| Electrical Safety | Comply with IEC 60601-1,IEC 60601-1-11 | Comply with IEC 60601-1 | Comply with IEC 60601-1,IEC 60601-1-11 | SAME |
| PhotobiologicalSafety | Comply with IEC 62471 | Comply with IEC 62471 | Comply with IEC 62471 | SAME |
| EMC | Comply with IEC60601-1-2 | Comply with IEC 60601-1-2 | Comply with IEC60601-1-2 | SAME |
| Biocompatibility | Comply with ISO 10993-1,ISO 10993-5 and ISO10993-10 | Comply with ISO 10993-1,ISO 10993-5 and ISO10993-10 | Comply with ISO 10993-1,ISO 10993-5 and ISO10993-10 | SAME |
| Label andLabeling | Conforms to FDARegulatory Requirements | Conforms to FDA RegulatoryRequirements | Conforms to FDARegulatory Requirements | SAME |
Table 3 Safety Comparison
Difference Analysis:
The subject device has indications for use, level of safety, and performance characteristics, that do not raise new types of questions regarding the safety and efficacy of the subject device.
For differences in the power sources, electrical safety testing according to IEC 60601-1 was conducted, and the test results demonstrated that the power source used in proposed device met the requirements of the standards.
For the device's user-contacting materials, biocompatibility testing according to ISO 10993 standard was conducted. The test results demonstrated that the materials used in proposed device met the requirements of the standard, and did not raise new safety or effectiveness concerns.
11. Substantially Equivalent (SE) Conclusion
Based on the comparison and analysis above, the proposed device is determined to be Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate K162098.
§ 878.4810 Laser surgical instrument for use in general and plastic surgery and in dermatology.
(a)
Identification. (1) A carbon dioxide laser for use in general surgery and in dermatology is a laser device intended to cut, destroy, or remove tissue by light energy emitted by carbon dioxide.(2) An argon laser for use in dermatology is a laser device intended to destroy or coagulate tissue by light energy emitted by argon.
(b)
Classification. (1) Class II.(2) Class I for special laser gas mixtures used as a lasing medium for this class of lasers. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 878.9.