K Number
K192074
Device Name
Signature ONE System
Date Cleared
2019-08-30

(28 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
888.3660
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP Authorized
Intended Use
The Signature™ ONE System is indicated, based on patient-specific radiological images with identifiable placement anatomical landmarks, to assist in pre-operative planning and/or intra-overative guiding of surgical instruments for shoulder replacement surgical procedures on patients not precluded from being radiologically scanned. The Signature™ ONE System is to be used with the glenoid components of the following shoulder implant systems in accordance with their indications: Zimmer® Trabecular Metal™ Reverse Plus Shoulder, Comprehensive® Total Shoulder System, Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder System and Comprehensive® Reverse Augmented Baseplates. The Signature™ ONE Guides and bone models are intended for single use only.
Device Description
The Signature™ ONE System is developed to assist in pre-operative planning of the glenoid component for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (using the Signature™ ONE Planner) and to accurately transfer a pre-operative plan to orthopedic surgical procedures (using the Signature™ ONE Guides) if desired. Both anatomic and reverse (TSA and RSA respectively) approaches are supported. The Signature ONE Guides and Bone Model are designed and manufactured of polyamide (nylon) using additive manufacturing (selective laser sintering), based on the approved/finalized pre-surgical plan and shipped prior to surgery. The guides and bone models are provide nonsterile and sterilized at the hospital. They are used intraoperatively to assist the surgeon in reproducing the plan. The Signature ONE System surgical technique remains close to the conventional shoulder arthroplasty to allow converting to standard surgical technique at any time if needed during the operation. The Signature™ ONE System uses the Zimmer Biomet Drive Portal for the interaction with external users (i.e. imaging technician and the surgeon). The internal users (i.e. the Zimmer Biomet operators) use manufacturing software applications to prepare the patient cases for the surgeon. Modifications have been made to some of the applications to improve the overall workflow: however, the patient specific guides and bone models remain unchanged from the predicate. In addition, modifications have been made to the user interface of the planning application.
More Information

Not Found

No
The summary describes a system for pre-operative planning and intra-operative guiding based on radiological images and additive manufacturing. It mentions modifications to workflow and user interface but does not mention AI, ML, or related terms, nor does it describe any training or test sets typically associated with AI/ML development. The performance studies focus on added features for landmark display and measurement, not on AI/ML performance metrics.

No.
The device assists in pre-operative planning and intra-operative guiding of surgical instruments; it does not directly treat or diagnose a disease or condition.

No

Explanation: The device is described as assisting in pre-operative planning and/or intra-operative guiding of surgical instruments, based on patient-specific radiological images. It does not state that it provides a diagnosis or detects a disease/condition. Its purpose is to facilitate a surgical procedure, not to identify a medical condition.

No

The device description explicitly states that the system includes "Signature ONE Guides and Bone Model" which are physical components manufactured using additive manufacturing and used intraoperatively. This indicates the system is not solely software.

Based on the provided information, the Signature™ ONE System is not an In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) device.

Here's why:

  • IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are devices intended for use in the collection, preparation, and examination of specimens taken from the human body (such as blood, urine, or tissue) to provide information for the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of disease.
  • Signature™ ONE System's Function: The Signature™ ONE System is designed to assist in pre-operative planning and intra-operative guiding of surgical instruments for shoulder replacement surgery. It uses patient-specific radiological images to create guides and models that help the surgeon during the procedure.
  • Lack of Specimen Analysis: The system does not involve the collection, preparation, or analysis of any biological specimens from the patient. Its function is based on interpreting and utilizing imaging data to facilitate a surgical procedure.

Therefore, the Signature™ ONE System falls under the category of a surgical planning and guidance system, not an In Vitro Diagnostic device.

N/A

Intended Use / Indications for Use

The Signature™ ONE System is indicated, based on patient-specific radiological images with identifiable placement anatomical landmarks, to assist in pre-operative planning and/or intra-overative guiding of surgical instruments for shoulder replacement surgical procedures on patients not precluded from being radiologically scanned.

The Signature™ ONE System is to be used with the glenoid components of the following shoulder implant systems in accordance with their indications: Zimmer® Trabecular Metal™ Reverse Plus Shoulder, Comprehensive® Total Shoulder System, Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder System and Comprehensive® Reverse Augmented Baseplates.

The Signature™ ONE Guides and bone models are intended for single use only.

Product codes

QHE, KWT, PHX, KWS, MBF

Device Description

The Signature™ ONE System is developed to assist in pre-operative planning of the glenoid component for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (using the Signature™ ONE Planner) and to accurately transfer a pre-operative plan to orthopedic surgical procedures (using the Signature™ ONE Guides) if desired. Both anatomic and reverse (TSA and RSA respectively) approaches are supported.

The Signature ONE Guides and Bone Model are designed and manufactured of polyamide (nylon) using additive manufacturing (selective laser sintering), based on the approved/finalized pre-surgical plan and shipped prior to surgery. The guides and bone models are provide nonsterile and sterilized at the hospital. They are used intraoperatively to assist the surgeon in reproducing the plan. The Signature ONE System surgical technique remains close to the conventional shoulder arthroplasty to allow converting to standard surgical technique at any time if needed during the operation.

The Signature™ ONE System uses the Zimmer Biomet Drive Portal for the interaction with external users (i.e. imaging technician and the surgeon). The internal users (i.e. the Zimmer Biomet operators) use manufacturing software applications to prepare the patient cases for the surgeon.

Modifications have been made to some of the applications to improve the overall workflow: however, the patient specific guides and bone models remain unchanged from the predicate. In addition, modifications have been made to the user interface of the planning application.

Mentions image processing

Not Found

Mentions AI, DNN, or ML

Not Found

Input Imaging Modality

patient-specific radiological images

Anatomical Site

Shoulder

Indicated Patient Age Range

Not Found

Intended User / Care Setting

Surgeon / Hospital

Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

Not Found

Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

Not Found

Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)

The following performance data was provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:

-Addition of a landmark to the Signature ONE Planner to display the location of the deepest glenoid point

  • A feature is added to the Signature ONE Planner to display the medial/lateral translation between the backside on the implant and a reference landmark located on the most lateral point of the glenoid

  • A feature is added to the Signature ONE Planner to display the percentage of contact between the selected implant and the glenoid surface

All of the test steps passed successfully.

Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)

Not Found

Predicate Device(s)

K190595

Reference Device(s)

Not Found

Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information

Not Found

§ 888.3660 Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.

(a)
Identification. A shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).(b)
Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-aluminum 4-vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(v) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal,”
(vii) F 1378-97 “Standard Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”

0

August 30, 2019

Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is a seal with an abstract design. To the right of the seal, there is the FDA logo in blue, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in a larger font and "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font. The logo is simple and professional, and it is easily recognizable.

Orthosoft, Inc. (d/b/a Zimmer CAS) Paul Hardy Regulatory Affairs Senior Specialist 75 Queen St Suite 3300 Montreal, CA H3C 2N6

Re: K192074

Trade/Device Name: Signature™ ONE System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3660 Regulation Name: Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QHE, KWT, PHX, KWS, MBF Dated: August 1, 2019 Received: August 2, 2019

Dear Paul Hardy:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part

1

801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

For CAPT Raquel Peat. PhD. MPH. USPHS Director OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

2

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known)

Device Name SignatureTM ONE system

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Signature™ ONE System is indicated, based on patient-specific radiological images with identifiable placement anatomical landmarks, to assist in pre-operative planning and/or intra-overative guiding of surgical instruments for shoulder replacement surgical procedures on patients not precluded from being radiologically scanned.

The Signature™ ONE System is to be used with the glenoid components of the following shoulder implant systems in accordance with their indications: Zimmer® Trabecular Metal™ Reverse Plus Shoulder, Comprehensive® Total Shoulder System, Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder System and Comprehensive® Reverse Augmented Baseplates.

The Signature™ ONE Guides and bone models are intended for single use only.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
-------------------------------------------------

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

3

510(k) Summary

In accordance with 21 CFR §807.92 and the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following information is provided for the Signature™ ONE System 510(k) premarket notification. The submission was prepared in accordance with the FDA guidance document, 'Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s', issued on August 12, 2005.

| Sponsor: | Orthosoft, Inc (d/b/a. Zimmer CAS)
75 Queen St., Suite 3300
Montreal, QC, CANADA H3C 2N6
Establishment Registration Number: 9617840 |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Paul Hardy
Regulatory Affairs Sr. Specialist
Telephone: 574-372-6799 |
| Date: | August 28, 2019 |
| Subject Device: | Trade Name: Signature™ ONE System
Common Name: Shoulder Arthroplasty implantation
system |
| | Classification Name:
• QHE- Shoulder Arthroplasty implantation system (21 CFR 888.3660) |
| | Additional Product Codes:
• KWT- Shoulder joint metal/polymer non-constrained cemented prosthesis
• KWS- Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis
• PHX- Shoulder joint metal/polymer non-constrained cemented prosthesis
• MBF- Shoulder joint metal/polymer/metal non-constrained or semi-constrained porous coated uncemented prosthesis |

4

Predicate Device(s):

K190595

Signature™ ONE Zimmer CAS System

Purpose and Device Description:

The Signature™ ONE System is developed to assist in pre-operative planning of the glenoid component for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (using the Signature™ ONE Planner) and to accurately transfer a pre-operative plan to orthopedic surgical procedures (using the Signature™ ONE Guides) if desired. Both anatomic and reverse (TSA and RSA respectively) approaches are supported.

The Signature ONE Guides and Bone Model are designed and manufactured of polyamide (nylon) using additive manufacturing (selective laser sintering), based on the approved/finalized pre-surgical plan and shipped prior to surgery. The guides and bone models are provide nonsterile and sterilized at the hospital. They are used intraoperatively to assist the surgeon in reproducing the plan. The Signature ONE System surgical technique remains close to the conventional shoulder arthroplasty to allow converting to standard surgical technique at any time if needed during the operation.

The Signature™ ONE System uses the Zimmer Biomet Drive Portal for the interaction with external users (i.e. imaging technician and the surgeon). The internal users (i.e. the Zimmer Biomet operators) use manufacturing software applications to prepare the patient cases for the surgeon.

Modifications have been made to some of the applications to improve the overall workflow: however, the patient specific guides and bone models remain unchanged from the predicate. In addition, modifications have been made to the user interface of the planning application.

The Signature™ ONE System is indicated, based on Indications for Use: patient-specific radiological images with identifiable placement anatomical landmarks, to assist in pre-operative planning and/or intra-operative guiding of surgical

5

instruments for shoulder replacement surgical procedures on patients not precluded from being radiologically scanned.

The Signature™ ONE System is to be used with the glenoid components of the following shoulder implant systems in accordance with their indications and contraindications: Zimmer® Trabecular Metal™ Reverse Plus Shoulder, Comprehensive® Total Shoulder System, Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder System and Comprehensive® Reverse Augmented Baseplates.

The Signature™ ONE Guides and Bone Models are intended for single use only.

Summary of Technological Characteristics:

The rationale for substantial equivalence is based on consideration of the following characteristics:

  • Intended Use: Same as predicate device
  • Indications for Use: Same as predicate device
  • Materials: Same as predicate device ●
  • Design Features: Modifications have been made to ● some of the planning applications, but the patient specific guides and bone models remain unchanged.

Summary of Performance Data (Nonclinical and/or Clinical)

The following performance data was provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:

-Addition of a landmark to the Signature ONE Planner to display the location of the deepest glenoid point

  • A feature is added to the Signature ONE Planner to display the medial/lateral translation between the backside on the implant and a reference landmark located on the most lateral point of the glenoid

  • A feature is added to the Signature ONE Planner to display the percentage of contact between the selected implant and the glenoid surface

All of the test steps passed successfully.

6

Substantial Equivalence Conclusion

The proposed and predicate device have the same intended use and the same principles of operation. The modifications to the proposed device do not alter the Indications for Use or the fundamental technology of the predicate device, or introduce any new technology. In sum, any differences between the devices do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness and the proposed device is at least as safe and effective as the legally marketed predicate device.