(52 days)
No
The description focuses on established navigation and control technologies based on spatial boundaries and proximity, with no mention of AI or ML algorithms for learning or decision-making.
No
The device is a surgical navigation and burring system that assists the surgeon during orthopedic procedures by providing guidance and controlled cutting, rather than directly treating a disease or condition itself.
No
The device is a surgical navigation and execution system, not a device for diagnosing medical conditions. It assists surgeons during orthopedic procedures.
No
The device description explicitly states that the NAVIO system is a "computer-assisted orthopedic surgical navigation and surgical burring system" and describes hardware components like a "passive infrared tracking camera," a "standard off-the-shelf surgical drill motor and bur," and a "handpiece." It also details how the software controls the cutting engagement of the surgical bur, indicating a direct interaction with hardware.
Based on the provided information, the NAVIO system is not an In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) device.
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states that the system is "intended to assist the surgeon in providing software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to anatomical structures during orthopedic procedures." It is used during surgery to guide the surgeon's actions on the patient's anatomy.
- Device Description: The description details a computer-assisted surgical navigation and burring system that interacts directly with the patient's bone during the procedure. It controls a surgical bur for cutting and shaping bone.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: IVD devices are used to examine specimens (like blood, tissue, or urine) outside of the body to provide information about a patient's health status, diagnose conditions, or monitor treatment. The NAVIO system does not perform any such analysis of specimens.
The NAVIO system is a surgical navigation and execution system used in vivo (within the living body) to assist the surgeon during orthopedic procedures.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The NAVIO system is intended to assist the surgeon in providing software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to anatomical structures during orthopedic procedures.
The NAVIO system is indicated for use in surgical knee procedures, in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to rigid anatomical bony structures can be determined. These procedures include unicondylar knee replacement (UKR), patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
The NAVIO system is indicated for use with cemented implants only.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
OLO
Device Description
The NAVIO system is a computer-assisted orthopedic surgical navigation and surgical burring system. The system uses established technologies of navigation, via a passive infrared tracking camera, to aid the surgeon in establishing a bone surface model for the target surgery and in planning the surgical implant location, based on intraoperatively-defined bone landmarks and known geometry of the surgical implant. The NAVIO system then aids the surgeon in executing the surgical plan by using a standard off-the-shelf surgical drill motor and bur (Anspach eMax2 Plus System, cleared via K080802), which has been adapted using a tracking system.
The surgical bur is inserted into a handpiece, which allows the bur to move within the handpiece. The NAVIO system software controls the cutting engagement of the surgical bur based on its proximity to the planned target surface. The cutting control is achieved in two ways:
- . Exposure control adjusts the bur's exposure with respect to a guard. If the surgeon encroaches on a portion of bone that is not to be cut, the NAVIO system retracts the bur inside the guard, disabling cutting.
- . Speed control regulates the signal going to the drill motor controller itself and will limit the speed of the drill if the target surface is approached. This mode of operation is useful in shaping surfaces of the condyle as well as placing post holes and fixation features for femoral and tibial cut guides.
Additionally, the surgeon can disable both controls and operate the NAVIO system handpiece as a standard navigated surgical drill. The surgeon must press on a footpedal to activate the surgical bur and enable cutting in all modes.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Knee, rigid anatomical bony structures
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Surgeon, orthopedic procedures
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Non-Clinical Testing (Bench): Design verification and validation tests were performed on the NAVIO surgical system to support the changes presented in this submission. Testing included software code reviews, bench testing, summative usability testing, and labeling verification and validation testing.
Trained technical support personnel performed verification testing to ensure that the changes made to the NAVIO system, including the updates to the NAVIO TKA instrument kit, addition of distal femur punches, updated labeling, qualification of a new implant database, and software modifications, performed as intended and that the subject device is as safe and effective as the predicate device.
The verification testing performed demonstrates that the updated NAVIO system meets the same accuracy specifications required for the predicate device.
Clinical Testing: No human clinical testing was conducted to determine safety and effectiveness of the NAVIO system.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
NAVIO Surgical System (K180271)
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 882.4560 Stereotaxic instrument.
(a)
Identification. A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: a symbol on the left and the FDA name on the right. The symbol is a stylized representation of a human figure, while the FDA name is written in blue and includes the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration".
June 28, 2019
Blue Belt Technologies, Inc. Amy Winegarden Regulatory Affairs Specialist II 2905 Northwest Blvd., Ste. 40 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
Re: K191223
Trade/Device Name: Navio Surgical System (NAVIO system) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLO Dated: May 23, 2019 Received: May 28, 2019
Dear Amy Winegarden:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
1
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
For- Shumaya Ali, MPH Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Stereotaxic, Trauma and Restorative Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K191223
Device Name NAVIO™ Surgical System (NAVIO system)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The NAVIO system is intended to assist the surgeon in providing software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to anatomical structures during orthopedic procedures.
The NAVIO system is indicated for use in surgical knee procedures, in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to rigid anatomical bony structures can be determined. These procedures include unicondylar knee replacement (UKR), patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
The NAVIO system is indicated for use with cemented implants only.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | ||
---|---|---|
☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ||
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
K191223
510(K) SUMMARY
| Submitted by: | Blue Belt Technologies, Inc.
2905 Northwest Blvd Ste. 40
Plymouth, MN 55441 USA
Tel: (763) 452-4950
Fax: (763) 452-4675 |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date of Submission: | June 27, 2019 |
| Contact Person: | Amy Winegarden
Regulatory Affairs Specialist II
T (412) 683-3844 x4135
Email: Amy.Winegarden@smith-nephew.com |
| Name of Device: | NAVIO ° Surgical System (NAVIO system) |
| Common Name: | Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument |
| Device Classification Name and
Reference: | 21 CFR 882.4560 |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | OLO |
| Supported Codes: | HSX, HRY, KRR, NPJ, JWH |
| Predicate Device: | NAVIO™ Surgical System (K180271) |
4
Intended Use
The NAVIO system is intended to assist the surgeon in providing software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to anatomical structures during orthopedic procedures.
Indications for Use
The NAVIO system is indicated for use in surgical knee procedures, in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to rigid anatomical bony structures can be determined. These procedures include unicondylar knee replacement (UKR), patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
The NAVIO system is indicated for use with cemented implants only.
The Intended Use and Indications for Use statements are the predicate device.
Device Description:
The NAVIO system is a computer-assisted orthopedic surgical navigation and surgical burring system. The system uses established technologies of navigation, via a passive infrared tracking camera, to aid the surgeon in establishing a bone surface model for the target surgery and in planning the surgical implant location, based on intraoperatively-defined bone landmarks and known geometry of the surgical implant. The NAVIO system then aids the surgeon in executing the surgical plan by using a standard offthe-shelf surgical drill motor and bur (Anspach eMax2 Plus System, cleared via K080802), which has been adapted using a tracking system.
The surgical bur is inserted into a handpiece, which allows the bur to move within the handpiece. The NAVIO system software controls the cutting engagement of the surgical bur based on its proximity to the planned target surface. The cutting control is achieved in two ways:
- . Exposure control adjusts the bur's exposure with respect to a guard. If the surgeon encroaches on a portion of bone that is not to be cut, the NAVIO system retracts the bur inside the guard, disabling cutting.
- . Speed control regulates the signal going to the drill motor controller itself and will limit the speed of the drill if the target surface is approached. This mode of operation is useful in shaping surfaces of the condyle as well as placing post holes and fixation features for femoral and tibial cut guides.
Additionally, the surgeon can disable both controls and operate the NAVIO system handpiece as a standard navigated surgical drill. The surgeon must press on a footpedal to activate the surgical bur and enable cutting in all modes.
5
Currently Supported Total Knee Implants
The following total knee implants are supported on the Navio system:
Implant Model Name | Manufacturer | 510(k) Number |
---|---|---|
JOURNEY II CR | Smith and Nephew | K121443 |
JOURNEY II BCS | Smith and Nephew | K111711 |
JOURNEY II XR | Smith and Nephew | K141471, K152726 |
GENESIS II CR/PS | Smith and Nephew | K951987, K962557 |
LEGION CR/PS | Smith and Nephew | K951987, K962557, K093746 |
NEO Total Knee System | New Era Orthopedics | K142388 |
Discussion of Similarities and Differences
The NAVIO system presented in this 510(k) submission is substantially equivalent to the predicate NAVIO, K180271. The intended use, indications for use, and the general functionality of the NAVIO system are unchanged from the previously submitted device.
This submission supports the following modifications to the NAVIO system:
-
- Updates to the NAVIO TKA instrument kit, including the addition of NAVIO system distal femur punches.
-
- Updates to the NAVIO system labeling.
- Qualification of a new implant database for the Smith & Nephew ANTHEM Total Knee 3. System (K142807).
-
- Workflow, user interface, and infrastructure updates to the NAVIO system Total Knee Application (TKA) software.
The implant product codes supported by the subject device are consistent with the predicate device. The established technologies that are used by the NAVIO system to prepare bone for attachment of implant components or for the attachment of the TKA femur and tibia cutting guides are unchanged. The UKR and PFA workflows have not changed from the predicate device, cleared via K180271.
| Table: Predicate Devices
Manufacturer | Description | Submission
Number | Clearance Date |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|----------------|
| Blue Belt Technologies, Inc. | NAVIO Surgical System | K180271 | 2/12/2018 |
6
Non-Clinical Testing (Bench)
Design verification and validation tests were performed on the NAVIO surgical system to support the changes presented in this submission. Testing included software code reviews, bench testing, summative usability testing, and labeling verification and validation testing.
Trained technical support personnel performed verification testing to ensure that the changes made to the NAVIO system, including the updates to the NAVIO TKA instrument kit, addition of distal femur punches, updated labeling, qualification of a new implant database, and software modifications, performed as intended and that the subject device is as safe and effective as the predicate device.
Clinical Testing
No human clinical testing was conducted to determine safety and effectiveness of the NAVIO system.
Conclusions
The NAVIO system described in this submission has the same intended use and the same technological characteristics as the NAVIO system, most recently cleared per K180271. The updates to the instrument kit, addition of distal femur punches, updated labeling, qualification of a new implant database, and software modifications do not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness.
The key determining factor is whether NAVIO control can be applied accurately to accomplish the desired cutting in accordance with the plan. The verification testing performed demonstrates that the updated NAVIO system meets the same accuracy specifications required for the predicate device.
The NAVIO system presented in this 510(k) premarket notification demonstrates that the updated NAVIO system continues to be as safe and effective as the predicate NAVIO system (K180271).