(162 days)
- [1] Cleaning of contaminated glass ceramic, zirconia, resin restorations, metal restorations and fiber post after intraoral try-in.
- [2] Cleaning for contaminated prepared tooth (cavity, root canal and tooth abutment), and implant abutment
This subject device is a dental cleaning agent suitable for non-abrasive cleaning of the bonding surfaces of prosthetic restorations after intraoral try-in.
It is also suitable for cleaning a contaminated prepared cavity, root canal, and tooth/ implant abutment. It is used in helping to achieve optimal adhesive results.
The provided text describes the regulatory clearance of a dental cleaning agent, KATANA Cleaner, by the FDA. It includes a 510(k) summary which details the device, its intended use, comparison to predicate and reference devices, and non-clinical performance testing.
Here's the breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them, based on the provided text:
1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
| Evaluation Item | Criteria | Subject Device (KATANA Cleaner) Performance | Predicate device (CONSEPSIS) Performance | Reference device (ZirClean) Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | In-house standard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES |
| Coating property | In-house standard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES |
| Shear bond strength (contaminated by artificial saliva) | ||||
| - Bovine Dentin | In-house standard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | N/A (not tested for ZirClean) |
| - Metal (Titan100) | In-house standard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES |
| - Ceramics (KATANA Zirconia HT) | In-house standard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES |
| pH (before rinse/ after rinse) | In-house Standard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES |
| Water solubility | In-house Standard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES |
| SEM and EDX Surface Comparison | In-house Standard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES |
| Staining Test | (Not explicitly stated, but confirms color) | Colored (Purple) | Colored (Blue) | Colored (Blue) |
Summary of Device Performance against Criteria:
- Appearance and Coating Property: The device met in-house standards, showing no difference from predicate and reference devices.
- Shear Bond Strength: The device demonstrated "good performance as cleaning agent," with shear bond strengths "equal to or greater than those of the predicate device and the reference device" after contamination with artificial saliva. Specifically, for "Just after prepared" and "for 3 weeks at 70 ℃/ 158 °F," the shear bond strength was equal to the "Positive control (Without contamination and applying the subject device)" and higher than the "Negative control (without the subject device)."
- pH (before rinse/after rinse): The pH value of the subject device was within the range of the predicate and reference devices and became neutral after rinsing, similar to the control.
- Water Solubility: The device was easily removed from the substrate, indicating good water solubility.
- SEM and EDX Surface Comparison: The peak area ratio of the subject device was the same as the control, predicate, and reference devices.
- Staining Test: The device was confirmed to be colored (purple), similar to the predicate and reference devices.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated in the provided text for the individual bench tests. The text only mentions "Shear bond strength tests to the adherent surfaces were performed on this device..." and does not give the number of samples per test.
- Data Provenance: The studies were performance bench tests ("Non-Clinical Performance Testing"). There is no mention of country of origin of the data or whether it was retrospective or prospective, as these are in vitro laboratory tests. The submitter, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., is based in Japan.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- This information is not applicable as the evaluation involved non-clinical bench testing (material science / engineering properties) rather than human reader interpretation of medical images or clinical data. "Ground truth" in this context refers to the measured physical and chemical properties, not expert consensus.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- This information is not applicable as the evaluation involved non-clinical bench testing and not human interpretation or adjudication.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- This information is not applicable. This submission is for a dental cleaning agent, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool. Therefore, an MRMC study or evaluation of human reader improvement with AI assistance was not performed.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:
- This information is not applicable. This is a physical dental cleaning agent, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):
- The "ground truth" for the non-clinical performance tests was established through measured physical and chemical properties, comparative analysis against controls (positive and negative), and comparison to predicate and reference devices. This includes:
- Direct measurements of shear bond strength.
- Visual inspection for appearance and coating property.
- pH measurements.
- Observation of water solubility.
- Analytical techniques like Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) for surface comparison.
- Biocompatibility testing according to ISO standards.
8. The sample size for the training set:
- This information is not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not a machine learning model; therefore, there is no "training set."
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- This information is not applicable as there is no training set for this type of device submission.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
October 8, 2019
Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. Yasujiro Ohara Manager, Quality Assurance Department Ote Center Bldg. 7F Chiyoda-ku, 100-0004 JAPAN
Re: K191133
Trade/Device Name: KATANA Cleaner, KATANA Cleaner (Trial) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3260 Regulation Name: Cavity Varnish Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PME, LBH Dated: September 6, 2019 Received: September 12, 2019
Dear Yasujiro Ohara:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Srinivas Nandkumar, Ph.D. Acting Director DHT1B: Division of Dental Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K191133
Device Name: KATANA Cleaner
Indications for Use:
- [1] Cleaning of contaminated glass ceramic, zirconia, resin restorations, metal restorations and fiber post after intraoral try-in.
- [2] Cleaning for contaminated prepared tooth (cavity, root canal and tooth abutment), and implant abutment
Prescription Use _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
1.510(k) owner (submitter)
| 1) Name | Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. |
|---|---|
| 2) Address | 1621 Sakazu, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-0801, Japan |
| 3) Contact person | Yasujiro OharaManagerQuality Assurance DepartmentKnd.Regist@kuraray.com |
| 4) Contact person in US | Manabu SuzukiDirectorDental Material DivisionKURARAY AMERICA, INC.33 Maiden Lane, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10038Tel: (212)-986-2230 (Ext. 115) or (800)-879-1676Fax: (212)-867-3543 |
| 2.Date: | 7th October, 2019 |
| 3.Name of Device |
| 1) Trade / Proprietary name | KATANA Cleaner |
|---|---|
| 2) Classification Name | External Cleaning Solution21 CFR 872.3260PMESubsequent Product Code: LBH(Cavity Varnish) |
- Common Name
Dental Cleaning Agent
{4}------------------------------------------------
| 4. Predicate Device | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1) CONSEPSIS | 510(k) Number:Classification:Product Code:21 CFR:Applicant: | K925375Cavity VarnishLBH872.3260ULTRADENT PRODUCTS, INC. |
| 5.Reference Devices | ||
| 1) Zirclean | 510(k) Number:Classification:Product Code:21 CFR:Applicant: | K163171External Cleaning SolutionPME872.3260Bisco, Inc. |
| 2) CLEARFIL SE BOND | 510(k) Number:Classification:Product Code:21 CFR:Applicant: | K990040Agent, Tooth Bonding, ResinKLE872.3200Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. |
| 3) CLEARFIL TRI-S BOND | 510(k) Number:Classification:Product Code:21 CFR:Applicant: | K042913Agent, Tooth Bonding, ResinKLE872.3200Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. |
| 4) K-ETCHANT Syringe | 510(k) Number:Classification:Product Code:21 CFR:Applicant: | K133078Agent, Tooth Bonding, ResinKLE872.3200Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. |
| 5) CLEARFILSE Protect | 510(k) Number:Classification:Product Code:21 CFR:Applicant: | K033938Agent, Tooth Bonding, ResinKLE872.3200Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. |
6.Device Description
This subject device is a dental cleaning agent suitable for non-abrasive cleaning of the bonding surfaces of prosthetic restorations after intraoral try-in.
It is also suitable for cleaning a contaminated prepared cavity, root canal, and tooth/ implant abutment. It is used in helping to achieve optimal adhesive results.
7.Statement of Indication for Use
The subject device is indicated for the following uses:
- [1] Cleaning of contaminated glass ceramic, zirconia, resin restorations, metal restorations and fiber post after intraoral try-in.
- [2] Cleaning for contaminated prepared tooth (cavity, root canal and tooth abutment), and implant abutment.
{5}------------------------------------------------
8.Substantial Equivalence Discussion
- Indication for Use
Indication for Use of the subject device, the predicate device and the reference device listed on the following table.
| Trade name | Indication for Use | |
|---|---|---|
| Subjectdevice | KATANACleaner | [1] Cleaning of contaminated glass ceramic, zirconia, resin restorations,metal restorations and fiber post after intraoral try-in..[2] Cleaning for contaminated prepared tooth (cavity, root canal and toothabutment), and implant abutment. |
| Predicatedevice | CONSEPSIS(K925375) | Consepsis liquid is used before crown cementation (temporary and/orpermanent) and for restorative preparation of crowns, inlays, andcomposite.Consepsis is a demonstrated, quality wetting agent for bonding, andincreasing bond strength.Consepsis recommended for procedural endodontic disinfection, as a finalendodontic rinse prior to canal obturation and as an antimicrobial prior topulp capping.Consepsis helps prevent the influx of micro-organisms into dentinaltubules.A clinician can reduce potential post-op pulpitis and sensitivity bythoroughly cleaning and disinfecting preparations with Consepsis beforesealing and restoring. |
| Referencedevice | ZirClean(K163171) | This device is an extra oral cleaner of pre-treated ceramic, zirconia andmetal restoration surfaces which have been contaminated during intraoraltry-in. |
| Table: Indication for Use of the subject device, the predicate device and the reference device | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -- | -- | -- | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
The subject device is substantially equivalent to CONSEPSIS (Predicate device) in that it can be used not only extra-orally for prior to cementation but also intra-orally for prior to sealing and restoring.
In terms of being used for dental prostheses, since CONSEPSIS (Predicate device) is used before crown cementation and for restorative preparation of crowns, inlays, and composite, Indication for Use [1] of the subject device is substantially equivalent to CONSEPSIS.
In addition, Indication for Use [1] is substantially equivalent to that of Zirclean due to clean pre-treated ceramic, zirconia and metal restoration surfaces.
In terms of being used for the tooth structure intra-orally, since CONSEPSIS (Predicate device) is used to thoroughly clean and disinfect the preparation prior to sealing and restoring, Indication for Use [2] of the subject device is substantially equivalent to CONSEPSIS.
The subject device is NOT used to disinfect.
Therefore, Indication for Use of the subject device is substantially equivalent to that of the predicate device.
- . Chemical ingredients
The subject device is categorized into the external communicating device (tissue/ bone/ dentin) and limited exposure device (contact to teeth less than 24hours).
All chemical ingredients of the subject device have been proven to be blended with our own reference devices. However, the chemical material percentage of the subject device differs from the reference devices. Thus, we evaluated whether this change result in an adverse biological response.
In addition, the manufacturing process of the subject device is substantially equivalent to those of the
{6}------------------------------------------------
reference devices in point of view of equipment, temperature, pressure and time.
Furthermore, these manufacturing processes do not include sterilization processes.
Regarding the reference devices (In-house device), there have not been any reported problems or recalls according to the post market adverse event reporting requirements in the US.
Since the contact site of the subject device is identical to those of the reference devices (contact to dentin), and the contact duration of the subject device is shorter than those of reference devices, we concluded that the risks by the ingredients of the subject is lower and safer than reference devices.
From the above, it was concluded that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the reference devices.
{7}------------------------------------------------
- . Comparison of Technological Characteristics Comparison of Technological characteristics table is shown below:
Table Comparison of Technological characteristics
| Table Comparison of Technological characteristics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KATANACleanerK191133 | Predicatedevice(CONSEPSIS)(K925375) | Referencedevice(ZirClean)(K163171) | ||
| Active ingredient | MDP *ammonium salt | Chlorohexidine | PotassiumHydroxide | |
| Operating principle for thecleaning ability to thecontaminated adherent | Micelle | Bactericidal | Alkalinecleaning effect | |
| Physical /MechanicalProperties | ||||
| Shear Bond Strength(modifiedISO/TS 11405:2015) | Removessalivacontamination | Removessalivacontamination | Removes salivacontamination | |
| Method ofApplication | Brush | Syringe orDispenser | Syringe tipor brush | |
| Method ofCleaning | Abrasive | Non-abrasive | Non-abrasive | |
| Device Geometry | Liquid | Liquid | Gel | |
| Method of Removal | Water rinsed &air dried | Air dry | Water spray & airdried | |
| Delivery configuration | Bottle | Syringe orDispenser | Syringe orBottle | |
| Removal | Water Soluble | Water Soluble | Water Soluble | |
| Chemical Composition | ||||
| Composition | Waterbased liquid | Waterbased liquid | Water based gel | |
| Viscosity modifier | Polyethyleneglycol | — | Xanthum Gum | |
| pH after rinsing | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
| Water Solubility | Water Soluble | Water Soluble | Water Soluble | |
| Pigmented | Yes-Purple | Yes-Blue | Yes-Blue |
- MDP is abbreviation of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate.
{8}------------------------------------------------
9. Non-Clinical Performance Testing
Shear bond strength tests to the adherent surfaces were performed on this device considering its intended use, in comparison with the predicate devices and the reference device. Since this subject device is a dental cleaning agent. in order to evaluate its performance, the adherents
were contaminated with artificial saliva prior to the shear bond strength test.
| Table Comparison with Predicate device and Reference device | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation Item | Criteria | Subject Device(KATANA Cleaner) | Predicate device(CONSEPSIS) | Referencedevice(ZirClean) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | In-housestandard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | |
| Coating property | In-housestandard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | |
| Shearbond strength(contaminatedby artificialsaliva) | BovineDentin | In-housestandard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | |
| Metal(Titan100) | In-housestandard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | |
| Ceramics(KATANAZirconia HT) | In-housestandard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | |
| pH(before rinse/ after rinse) | In-houseStandard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | ||
| Water solubility | In-houseStandard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | |
| SEM and EDX SurfaceComparison | In-houseStandard | COMPLIES | COMPLIES | COMPLIES |
Regarding "Appearance" and "Coating property", there are no difference among the subject device, the predicate device and the reference device.
Each shear bond strength of the subject device such as "Just after prepared" and "for 3 weeks at 70 ℃/ 158 °F." is equal to "Positive control (Without contamination and applying the subject device)". And shear bond strength of the subject device is higher than that of "Negative control (without the subject device)" where the adherent surface is contaminated by artificial saliva. It indicates that the subject device shows the good performance as cleaning agent. In comparison with the predicate device and reference device, the subject device's results showed equal to or greater than those of the predicate device and the reference device.
Regarding pH, the value of the subject device is located between the values of predicate device and the reference device. So, it is considered that pH of the subject device is substantially equivalent to those of the predicate device and the reference device.
For "Staining Test", we confirmed the subject device was colored, and substantially equivalent to the predicate device and the reference device.
Regarding "Water solubility", the subject device was easily removed from substrate. Also, at "pH (after rinse)", the value of the subject device showed the same value of control which is not apply any devices.
Finally, at "SEM and EDX Surface Comparison", peak area ratio of the subject device is the same as the value of control and the predicate device and reference device.
From the above result, the subject device can be easily rinsed with water.
{9}------------------------------------------------
We evaluated the biocompatibility of the subject device according to "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff" and "ISO 10993-1:2018". As a conclusion of biological evaluation, we have concluded that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the reference devices.
10.Conclusion
The comparison for Indication for Use, chemical ingredients and performance data shows that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device and the reference device.
§ 872.3260 Cavity varnish.
(a)
Identification. Cavity varnish is a device that consists of a compound intended to coat a prepared cavity of a tooth before insertion of restorative materials. The device is intended to prevent penetration of restorative materials, such as amalgam, into the dentinal tissue.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an external cleaning solution, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.