(331 days)
Z5-BL implants are designed for surgical implantation into the upper and lower jaw for the attachment of prosthodontic appliances to replace missing teeth. Z5-BL implants are suitable for patients with metal allergies and the chronic diseases resulting from them. Z5-BL implants are intended for delayed loading.
Z5-BL is a dental implant system that includes root-form, endosseous threaded dental implants indicated for bone level placement. The dental implants are provided in body diameters of 4 mm and 5 mm, and each diameter is provided in 8, 10, and 12 mm lengths. The dental implants are manufactured from Y - TZP zirconia conforming to ISO 13356. The system also includes a healing cap, gingiva formers, and a temporary abutment manufactured from polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Zircoma abutments for single-unit and multi-unit cemented restorations are provided in straight and 15° angled designs. For retention of overdentures, Zirconia Locator-type abutments are provided in straight and 15° angled designs. Occlusal (abutment) screws are provided in Ti-6Al-4V alloy conforming to ASTM F136 and in zirconia.
The subject device implants and Healing Cap are provided sterilized by plasma gas. All other components are to be sterilized by the end-user by moist heat (steam).
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Z5-BL dental implant. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance data. However, it does not contain information about acceptance criteria and studies proving the device meets those criteria in the context of AI/ML performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, or MRMC studies).
The document explicitly states: "No clinical data were included in this submission." This means there is no performance data related to human-in-the-loop studies, standalone AI performance, or any studies that would involve establishing ground truth from expert consensus or pathology for evaluating AI model performance.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information for acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria from the provided text, as it describes a traditional medical device submission for dental implants, not an AI/ML-driven device.
To answer your specific questions in the context of an AI/ML device, I would need a different type of document that describes performance data related to an AI/ML algorithm.
§ 872.3640 Endosseous dental implant.
(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.