AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

This sunlamp product is intended exclusively for aesthetic tanning of the human skin, for one person at a time, at the age of 18 or above.

Device Description

The primary technical components of sunlamp products are artificial sources of UV radiation as well as a mechanical structure with a defined active surface.

UV lamps emit different UV-A and UV-B proportions of the UV radiation. The UV-A proportion primarily generates a superficial tan, which appears rapidly and is intensive but also fades more rapidly. The UV-B radiation is primarily responsible for more long-term tanning results. Traditional UV light with the addition of (beauty) red light results in a natural looking tan. Optimal tanning results are achieved due to the synergistic combination of light spectra.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for sunlamp products (Ergoline Inspiration 550 Hybrid Technology and Ergoline Planet Fitness 42/4 Hybrid Light Technology). It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than proving that the device meets specific performance criteria through a clinical study or complex AI validation.

Therefore, many of the requested details, such as those related to AI algorithm performance (e.g., sample size for test/training sets, expert ground truth, MRMC study, standalone performance, validation of ground truth), are not present in this document because they are not applicable to the type of device and regulatory submission described.

The "performance testing" mentioned in the document refers to compliance with established electrical, mechanical, and safety standards for sunlamp products, not an AI-driven diagnostic or treatment device.

Here's an analysis based on the available information and an explanation of why other requested information is not present:


Device Description: Sunlamp products (Ergoline Inspiration 550 Hybrid Technology, Ergoline Planet Fitness 42/4 Hybrid Light Technology, and their variants).

Intended Use: Exclusively for aesthetic tanning of human skin, for one person at a time, at the age of 18 or above.

Regulatory Class: Class II

Predicate Device: Ergoline Inspiration 600 Dynamic Performance (K151400)


1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The "acceptance criteria" for this type of device, as demonstrated in a 510(k), are primarily related to meeting established safety and performance standards for sunlamp products and demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device. There aren't "performance metrics" in the typical sense of accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity as one would see for a diagnostic AI.

Acceptance Criteria (as implied by 510(k) process for this device type)Reported Device Performance (from "Summary of performance testing" and comparison table)
Compliance with U.S. Performance Standard 21 CFR 1040.20The proposed devices are in compliance with U.S. performance standard 21CFR 1040.20.
BiocompatibilityTested in accordance with ISO 10993-series. (Implied compliance, details not given)
Electrical and Mechanical SafetyTested in accordance with IEC 60601-1. (Implied compliance, details not given)
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)Tested in accordance with IEC 60601-1-2. (Implied compliance, details not given)
Maintenance of Irradiance Ratio per 1040.20Fulfilled (for both proposed and predicate devices).
Max Exposure Time12 minutes (Identical to predicate).
Identical Intended Use/Indications for Use as PredicateIdentical.
No New Potential Hazards or Safety Risks IntroducedDevice comparison and testing imply no new hazards.
All Special Controls FulfilledAll Special Controls are fulfilled.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

  • Not applicable / Not provided. This document describes a submission for a sunlamp and does not involve AI or a complex test set of patient data. The "testing" refers to lab-based compliance testing of the physical device.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

  • Not applicable / Not provided. No patient data test set or ground truth establishment by experts for performance evaluation (e.g., diagnostic accuracy) is described.

4. Adjudication method for the test set:

  • Not applicable / Not provided. No test set requiring expert adjudication for AI performance.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

  • No. This is a sunlamp product, not an AI-assisted diagnostic device. MRMC studies are not relevant here.

6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

  • Not applicable. This relates to an AI algorithm, which is not part of this device or submission type.

7. The type of ground truth used:

  • Not applicable. No ground truth in the context of diagnostic accuracy is relevant. The "ground truth" for this device would be its adherence to specified physical and electrical parameters and safety standards, as verified through laboratory testing against those standards.

8. The sample size for the training set:

  • Not applicable / Not provided. No AI training set is mentioned as part of this device submission.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

  • Not applicable / Not provided. No AI training set.

Summary of the Study (as described in the document):

The "study" presented in this 510(k) summary is not a clinical study in the traditional sense, nor is it an AI performance validation study. Instead, it is a design verification and validation process to demonstrate that the new sunlamp devices are substantially equivalent to a previously cleared predicate device and that they comply with applicable U.S. and international safety and performance standards.

The core of the "proof" the device meets acceptance criteria lies in:

  • Comparison to Predicate Device: Showing that the proposed devices have identical intended use and similar technological characteristics, with any differences not raising new questions of safety or effectiveness. Key differences (e.g., number of lamps, wattage) are addressed by stating that irradiance characteristics are comparable and safety has been confirmed by corresponding tests.
  • Compliance with Recognized Standards: Stating that the devices have been tested and comply with:
    • U.S. Performance Standard 21 CFR 1040.20 (Sunlamp Products)
    • ISO 10993-series (Biocompatibility)
    • IEC 60601-1 (Electrical and Mechanical Safety)
    • IEC 60601-1-2 (Electromagnetic Compatibility)

The document concludes that the proposed devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate, do not introduce new indications or hazards, and fulfill all Special Controls.

§ 878.4635 Sunlamp products and ultraviolet lamps intended for use in sunlamp products.

(a)
Identification. A sunlamp product is any device designed to incorporate one or more ultraviolet (UV) lamps intended for irradiation of any part of the living human body, by UV radiation with wavelengths in air between 200 and 400 nanometers, to induce skin tanning. This definition includes tanning beds and tanning booths. A UV lamp intended for use in sunlamp products is any lamp that produces UV radiation in the wavelength interval of 200 to 400 nanometers in air.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for sunlamp products and UV lamps intended for use in sunlamp products are:(1) Conduct performance testing that demonstrates the following:
(i) Device meets appropriate output performance specifications such as wavelengths, energy density, and lamp life; and
(ii) Device's safety features, such as timers to limit UV exposure and alarms, function properly.
(2) Demonstrate that device is mechanically safe to prevent user injury.
(3) Demonstrate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.
(4) Demonstrate that device is biocompatible.
(5) Demonstrate that device is electrically safe and electromagnetically compatible in its intended use environment.
(6)
Labeling —(i)Sunlamp products. (A) The warning statement below must appear on all sunlamp products and must be placed in a black box. This statement must be permanently affixed or inscribed on the product when fully assembled for use so as to be legible and readily accessible to view by the person who will be exposed to UV radiation immediately before the use of the product. It shall be of sufficient durability to remain legible throughout the expected lifetime of the product. It shall appear on a part or panel displayed prominently under normal conditions of use so that it is readily accessible to view whether the tanning bed canopy (or tanning booth door) is open or closed when the person who will be exposed approaches the equipment and the text shall be at least 10 millimeters (height). Labeling on the device must include the following statement: Attention: This sunlamp product should not be used on persons under the age of 18 years. (B) Manufacturers shall provide validated instructions on cleaning and disinfection of sunlamp products between uses in the user instructions.
(ii)
Sunlamp products and UV lamps intended for use in sunlamp products. Manufacturers of sunlamp products and UV lamps intended for use in sunlamp products shall provide or cause to be provided in the user instructions, as well as all consumer-directed catalogs, specification sheets, descriptive brochures, and Web pages in which sunlamp products or UV lamps intended for use in sunlamp products are offered for sale, the following contraindication and warning statements:(A) “Contraindication: This product is contraindicated for use on persons under the age of 18 years.”
(B) “Contraindication: This product must not be used if skin lesions or open wounds are present.”
(C) “Warning: This product should not be used on individuals who have had skin cancer or have a family history of skin cancer.”
(D) “Warning: Persons repeatedly exposed to UV radiation should be regularly evaluated for skin cancer.”
(c)
Performance standard. Sunlamp products and UV lamps intended for use in sunlamp products are subject to the electronic product performance standard at § 1040.20 of this chapter.