K Number
K190026
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2019-08-21

(226 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
868.5150
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Arrow Epidural Needles are intended to inject local anesthetic into a patient to provide regional anesthesia or to facilitate the placement of an epidural catheter.

Device Description

The Arrow Epidural Needles are sterile, single use, disposable devices. They are used for the injection of anesthetic agents into a patient for regional anesthesia administration or to facilitate the placement of an epidural catheter for continuous infusion of local anesthetics.

The Arrow Epidural Needles consist of a plastic cannula hub with integrated wings that come with either Luer Connector and NRFit Connector, stainless steel cannula, and plastic stylet. The purpose of the stylet is to prevent tissue coring during needle insertion. The needle assembly is protected with a guard to prevent damage to the needle.

AI/ML Overview

This document is an FDA 510(k) summary for the Arrow Epidural Needles. It does not present a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in the way typically seen for AI/ML medical devices where performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or AUC are evaluated on a test set against a ground truth.

Instead, this document describes a traditional medical device submission where "acceptance criteria" are related to engineering performance standards, material characteristics, and biological safety, rather than diagnostic accuracy or clinical effectiveness in a comparative human-AI study.

Therefore, many of the requested fields are not applicable to the content provided. Here's a breakdown based on the provided document:


Device: Arrow Epidural Needles
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: BSP (Anesthesia Conduction Needle)
K190026


1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The "Performance Data" section in the document outlines the tests performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device. These are engineering and biocompatibility tests, not clinical performance metrics for diagnostic accuracy.

TestStandard (if applicable)Principle of Test
Joint Between the Needle Hub and Needle Cannula Joint Between the Stylet Hub and Stylet CannulaBS 6196A tensile force is applied for a specified time to the union being tested, and the union observed to determine if it parts. (Performance results are not explicitly numerical values but are implied to have met the standard, as the device was cleared for substantial equivalence)
StiffnessISO 9626A specified force is applied to the centre of the specified length of tubing, which is supported at both ends, and the amount of deflection measured. (Implied to have met the standard)
Resistance to breakageISO 9626One end of the tubing is firmly fixed, and a force applied to the tubing at a specified distance from the point of fixation, so as to bend the tubing through a specified angle, first in one direction and then in the opposite direction, for a specified number of cycles. (Implied to have met the standard)
Resistance to corrosionISO 9626The tubing is partially immersed in sodium chloride solution for a specified time and afterwards the immersed portion compared visually with the un immersed portion for signs of corrosion. (Implied to have met the standard)
Luer ConnectorISO 594-1, ISO 594-2To test unscrewing gauging, liquid leakage, air leakage, separation force. (Implied to have met the standard)
NRFit ConnectorISO 80369-6To test unscrewing gauging, liquid leakage, air leakage, separation force. (Implied to have met the standard)
BiocompatibilityISO 10993Testing included Cytotoxicity, Sensitization, Irritation, Acute Systemic Toxicity and Material Mediated Pyrogenicity. (Implied to have met the standard)
LAL Bacterial EndotoxinAAMI ST72LAL Bacterial Endotoxin testing of medical devices that have contact with CSF. (Implied to have met the standard)
PackagingISO 11607-1, ASTM D4169Stability and Distribution simulation testing. (Implied to have met the standard)

Note: For traditional medical devices like this, the "acceptance criteria" are the successful completion of these standard tests, demonstrating that the device performs as intended and is safe and effective when compared to a legally marketed predicate device. The "reported device performance" is the successful completion of these tests, leading to the substantial equivalence determination. Specific numerical results are not typically summarized in the 510(k) summary unless critical for comparison.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and the Data Provenance

  • Sample Size: Not specified in the 510(k) summary. These tests are typically conducted on a sample number of manufactured devices according to the respective standards and internal quality control procedures.
  • Data Provenance: Not applicable in the context of clinical data for AI/ML. The tests are laboratory-based engineering and biological evaluations of the physical device. The testing was conducted by or for Teleflex Medical.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts

  • Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device requiring clinical ground truth establishment by medical experts for diagnostic accuracy. The "ground truth" for these tests is defined by the passing criteria of the international and industry standards (e.g., ISO, BS, ASTM, AAMI).

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

  • Not applicable. There is no "adjudication" in the sense of resolving discrepancies between human readers or an algorithm. The tests are objective measurements against defined standards.

5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done

  • No. This is not an AI/ML device that assists human readers.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

  • Not applicable. This device is a physical epidural needle, not an algorithm.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

  • Not applicable in the AI/ML sense. The "ground truth" for the performance tests described are the established specifications and pass/fail criteria defined by the relevant international and industry standards (e.g., tensile strength, resistance to breakage, corrosion resistance, Luer/NRFit connector integrity, biocompatibility, sterility) these devices are required to meet.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

  • Not applicable. This is a hardware medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

  • Not applicable. There is no training set for this type of device.

In conclusion, this FDA 510(k) summary is for a traditional medical device (an epidural needle) and demonstrates substantial equivalence based on engineering performance, material characteristics, and biocompatibility testing against international and industry standards, not on clinical performance or diagnostic accuracy evaluated with a clinical test set and human readers as would be typical for an AI/ML medical device.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters 'FDA' in a blue square, followed by the words 'U.S. FOOD & DRUG' and 'ADMINISTRATION' in blue text.

August 21, 2019

Teleflex Medical Lakshmi Kanuri Regulatory Affairs Specialist 3015 Carrington Mill Blvd Morrisville, North Carolina 27560

Re: K190026

Trade/Device Name: Arrow Epidural Needle Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5150 Regulation Name: Anesthesia Conduction Needle Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: BSP Dated: July 19, 2019 Received: July 22, 2019

Dear Lakshmi Kanuri:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's

{1}------------------------------------------------

requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Todd Courtney Assistant Director DHT1C: Division of ENT, Sleep Disordered Breathing, Respiratory and Anesthesia Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K190026

Device Name Arrow Epidural Needles

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Arrow Epidural Needles are intended to inject local anesthetic into a patient to provide regional anesthesia or to facilitate the placement of an epidural catheter.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

510(k) SUMMARY

K190026

1. Name, Address, Phone and Fax Number of Applicant

Teleflex Medical, Incorporated 3015 Carrington Mill Blvd Morrisville, NC 27560 USA Phone: 919-361-4087 Fax: 919-433-4996

2. Contact Person

Lakshmi Kanuri Regulatory Affairs Specialist

3. Date Prepared

August 21, 2019

4. Device Name

Trade Name:Arrow Epidural Needles
Classification Name:Anesthesia conduction needle (w/wo introducer)
FDA Product Code:BSP
CFR Number:868.5150
Regulatory Class:II

5. Predicate Device

K131006 - AN-E Epidural Needle

6. Device Description

The Arrow Epidural Needles are sterile, single use, disposable devices. They are used for the injection of anesthetic agents into a patient for regional anesthesia administration or to facilitate the placement of an epidural catheter for continuous infusion of local anesthetics.

The Arrow Epidural Needles consist of a plastic cannula hub with integrated wings that come with either Luer Connector and NRFit Connector, stainless steel cannula, and plastic stylet. The purpose of the stylet is to prevent tissue coring during needle insertion. The needle assembly is protected with a guard to prevent damage to the needle.

7. Indications for Use

The Arrow Epidural Needles are intended to inject local anesthetic into a patient to provide regional anesthesia or to facilitate the placement of an epidural catheter.

{4}------------------------------------------------

CHARACTERISTICPREDICATE DEVICEK131006SUBJECT DEVICE
Applicant NameLCCS PRODUCTSLIMITEDARROW INTERNATIONALINC.
Device Classification NameAnesthesia conductionneedle(w/wo introducer)Anesthesia conduction needle(w/wo introducer)
FDA Product CodeBSPBSP
CFR Number868.5150868.5150
Regulatory ClassIIII
Trade NameAN-E Epidural NeedleArrow Epidural Needle
Intended Use/Indications forUseIntended for the transientdelivery of anesthetics toprovide neuraxialanesthetics or to facilitateplacement of an epiduralcatheter.The Arrow Epidural Needlesare intended to inject localanesthetic into a patient toprovide regional anesthesia orto facilitate the placement of anepidural catheter.
Needle Guage Size15 GA - 20 GA17 GA
Needle Length50 mm - 150 mm88.9mm (8.89 cm) (3-1/2")
Tip DesignTuohy, Quincke, PencilPointTuohy
Needle Cannula Material304 Stainless Steel304 Stainless Steel
Needle Hub MaterialK-Resin KR03Clear Acrylic
Stylet Cannula Material304 STAINLESS STEELClear Polypropylene
Stylet Hub MaterialHDPEGray Polypropylene
Connector TypeISO 594 LuerISO 594 LuerISO 80369-6 NRFit
Final Needle AssemblyProtectionNot statedGuard
CHARACTERISTICPREDICATE DEVICE K131006SUBJECT DEVICE
MarkingsNot stated1 cm (10 mm)
PerformanceISO 7864 Hub to Needle Bond StrengthISO 9626 StiffnessISO 9626 Resistance to breakageISO 594-1 and ISO 594-2 Luer ConnectorBS 6196 Joint Between the Needle Hub and Needle Cannula and Joint Between the Stylet Hub and Stylet CannulaISO 9626 StiffnessISO 9626 Resistance to breakageISO 9626 Resistance to corrosionISO 594-1 and ISO 594-2 Luer ConnectorISO 80369-6 NRFit Connector
Method of SterilizationNot statedEthylene Oxide
Shelf LifeNot statedOne year
PackagingNot statedTyvek Pouch

8. Technological Characteristics Comparison to the predicate

{5}------------------------------------------------

{6}------------------------------------------------

9. Performance Data

A summary of tests relied upon to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate can be found in the Table below

TestStandard (if applicable)Principle of Test
Joint Between the Needle Hub and Needle CannulaJoint Between the Stylet Hub and Stylet CannulaBS 6196A tensile force is applied for a specified time to the union being tested, and the union observed to determine if it parts.
StiffnessISO 9626A specified force is applied to the centre of the specified length of tubing, which is supported at both ends, and the amount of deflection measured.
Resistance to breakageISO 9626One end of the tubing is firmly fixed, and a force applied to the tubing at a specified distance from the point of fixation, so as to bend the tubing through a specified angle, first in one direction and then in the opposite direction, for a specified number of cycles.
Resistance to corrosionISO 9626The tubing is partially immersed in sodium chloride solution for a specified time and afterwards the immersed portion compared visually with the un immersed portion for signs of corrosion.
Luer ConnectorISO 594-1ISO 594-2To test unscrewing gauging, liquid leakage, air leakage, separation force.
NRFit ConnectorISO 80369-6To test unscrewing gauging, liquid leakage, air leakage, separation force.
BiocompatibilityISO 10993Testing included Cytotoxicity, Sensitization, Irritation, Acute Systemic Toxicity and Material Mediated Pyrogenicity
LAL Bacterial EndotoxinAAMI ST72LAL Bacterial Endotoxin testing of medical devices that have contact with CSF
PackagingISO 11607-1ASTM D4169Stability and Distribution simulation testing

10. Conclusion

The Arrow Epidural Needle has similar indications for use and technology of construction as the predicate device. Performance test results demonstrate that the proposed device meets its intended use. It is for these reasons that the proposed device is substantially equivalent to the proposed predicate device and does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.

§ 868.5150 Anesthesia conduction needle.

(a)
Identification. An anesthesia conduction needle is a device used to inject local anesthetics into a patient to provide regional anesthesia.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).