(543 days)
The Livia is designed for symptomatic relief and management of chronic pain, and for temporary relief of pain associated with sore and aching muscles in the shoulder, waist, back, upper extremities (arm) and lower (extremities) leg due to strain from exercise or normal household work activities. The Livia is also indicated for temporary relief of pain associated with dysmenorrhea (menstrual cramps) when used with over-the-counter pain medication.
The LIVIA is a TENS device. TENS is an acronym for Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator, and it works as a pain treatment system through electrotherapy. The unit sends light electrical pulses into the body through the skin by the use of electrodes, which are placed over peripheral nerves. The TENS unit works by sending high frequency electrical signals that are both continuous and mild to block out those pain signals that are being delivered to the brain. The Livia device was designed with specific pulse frequency and pulse length that are suitable for its intended use. When these pain signals are halted, pain isn't felt by the reactive area and the patient get relief. Low frequency bursts of mild electrotherapy also help the natural pain control response to activate, and these beta endorphins ease the pain that are being felt by the patient.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria (Implicit for this type of device) | Reported Device Performance from Clinical Study (for dysmenorrhea) |
|---|---|
| Safe for its intended use | No technical problems detected; Usability received good scores. (Implied safety from lack of adverse events reported in summary) |
| Effective for symptomatic relief and management of chronic pain (general) | The study specifically focused on dysmenorrhea. Performance for general chronic pain is not detailed in this summary for the "new" indication. |
| Effective for temporary relief of pain associated with sore and aching muscles (e.g., shoulder, waist, back, etc.) | The study specifically focused on dysmenorrhea. Performance for muscular pain is not detailed in this summary for the "new" indication. |
| Effective for temporary relief of pain associated with dysmenorrhea (menstrual cramps) when used with OTC pain medication | Reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score: - Livia: Average 28.1 points reduction - Sham: Average 17.6 points reduction - Statistically significant difference (P<0.0001) between Livia and Sham. - Improvement in Quality of Life (QoL) score. |
Note: The acceptance criteria for the "new" indication (dysmenorrhea) are derived from the fact that a clinical trial was specifically conducted to demonstrate effectiveness and safety for this indication. For the other indications (general chronic pain, muscle pain), the device is considered substantially equivalent to the predicate, implying they meet the general TENS efficacy and safety criteria.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size for Test Set: 65 participants
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but the submitter (LifeCare Ltd.) is based in Tiberias, Israel. The clinical study was a "multi-center" study conducted at "four study sites." This suggests the data could be from Israel or other international locations where these study sites were located. The study design was prospective (a "randomized, controlled, multi-center, crossover, prospective, double-blind clinical study").
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This type of device (TENS for pain relief) relies on patient-reported outcomes (e.g., pain scales, quality of life surveys) rather than expert interpretation of medical images or pathology. Therefore, there were no experts used to establish a ground truth in the typical sense of diagnostic accuracy studies. The "ground truth" for pain relief was the subjective experience reported by the participants themselves, measured using standardized scales like VAS.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable in the traditional sense. The primary outcome measure (VAS score for pain) is a direct patient report. There's no mention of an external adjudication panel for the primary endpoint. The study design was double-blind, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers administering the device knew whether it was the active Livia device or the sham device.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not conducted. MRMC studies are typically used for diagnostic devices where multiple readers interpret clinical cases. This study was a clinical trial evaluating pain relief, which uses patient-reported outcomes.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done
Isolated standalone performance of a software algorithm was not performed as this device is a hardware TENS unit. The clinical trial directly evaluated the device's efficacy when used by humans.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth for the effectiveness of pain relief was patient-reported outcomes, specifically:
- Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain intensity.
- Quality of Life (QoL) scores.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not mention a "training set" in the context of an algorithm or AI development. This study is an effectiveness trial for a physical medical device. The closest concept related to establishing the device's parameters would be the R&D and engineering phases that determined the specific pulse frequency and length, but this information is not detailed here and wouldn't be referred to as a "training set" in this context.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As there's no mention of a "training set" for an algorithm, this question is not applicable based on the provided text. The device's design (e.g., specific pulse frequency and length) was likely established through engineering design, pre-clinical testing, and potentially prior clinical experience with similar TENS devices, rather than an algorithmic training process.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
May 4, 2020
LifeCare Ltd. % Irving Wiesen Official Correspondent Cohen, Tauber, Spievack & Wagner 420 Lexington Avenue - Suite 2400 New York, New York 10170
Re: K183110
Trade/Device Name: Livia Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5890 Regulation Name: Transcutaneous electrical stimulator for pain relief Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NUH Dated: June 11, 2019 Received: March 3, 2020
Dear Irving Wiesen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Vivek J. Pinto -S
Vivek Pinto, PhD Director DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Physical Medicine Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K183110
Device Name Livia
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Livia is designed for symptomatic relief and management of chronic pain, and for temporary relief of pain associated with sore and aching muscles in the shoulder, waist, back, upper extremities (arm) and lower (extremities) leg due to strain from exercise or normal household work activities. The Livia is also indicated for temporary relief of pain associated with dysmenorrhea (menstrual cramps) when used with over-the-counter pain medication.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Registration Use (Part 1 CFR 221 Subpart B) | |
|---|---|
| Service-Type Contracting (Part 1 CFR 221 Subpart C) |
__ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
|X | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Section 5: 510(K) SUMMARY
The assigned 510(K) Number: K183110
1. Submitter's Identification:
LifeCare Ltd.
Zipori St.2 1424602, Tiberias, Israel
Date Summary Prepared: May 1, 2020
Contact Person: Irving L. Wiesen, Esq. Law Offices of Irving L. Wiesen P.C. 420 Lexington Avenue - Suite 2400 New York, New York 10170 Tel 212-381-8774 Fax 646-536-3185 Email: iwiesen@wiesenlaw.com
2. Name of the Device:
Livia
3. Common Name and Classification:
Stimulator, Nerve, Transcutaneous, Over-The-Counter 21 CFR Part 882.5890 Requlation: Product Code: NUH
4. Predicate Device Information:
LIVIA K163153
5. Device Description:
The LIVIA is a TENS device. TENS is an acronym for Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator, and it works as a pain treatment system through electrotherapy. The unit sends light electrical pulses into the body through the skin by the use of electrodes, which are placed over peripheral nerves. The TENS unit works by sending high frequency electrical signals that are both continuous and mild to block out those pain signals that are being delivered to the brain. The Livia device was designed with specific pulse frequency and pulse length that are suitable for its intended use. When these pain signals are halted, pain isn't felt by the reactive area and the patient get relief. Low frequency bursts
{4}------------------------------------------------
of mild electrotherapy also help the natural pain control response to activate, and these beta endorphins ease the pain that are being felt by the patient.
6. Indication For Use:
The Livia is designed for symptomatic relief and management of chronic pain. and for temporary relief of pain associated with sore and aching muscles in the shoulder, waist, back, neck, upper extremities (arm) and lower (extremities) leg due to strain from exercise or normal household work activities. The Livia is also indicated for temporary relief of pain associated with dysmenorrhea (menstrual cramps) when used with over-the-counter pain medications.
7. Comparison to Predicate Devices:
The Livia proposed device technological characteristics are identical to Livia K163153. The indications for use are the same except that the Indications for Use of the proposed device includes dysmenorrhea (menstrual cramps) as a kind of pain which may be treated by the device. In the User Manual of the predicate device, menstrual cramps are included as an appropriate use of the device, along with illustrations of electrode placement for such use. The purpose of the instant 510K is to include menstrual pain in the types of pain included in the Indications for Use, for the education of the consumer who may be searching for a product which is appropriate for that use, before or at the point of sale. While the predicate device already contains menstrual pain as a use of the device, LifeCare has conducted a clinical trial designed to show efficacy and safety in that indication. The report of this trial is included in this application. 020_Performance Testing-Clinical.
TABLE 1: Indication For Use Comparison Table
| Parameter | Proposed Device | Predicate Device |
|---|---|---|
| LIVIA | ||
| IndicationFor Use | The Livia is designed forsymptomatic relief andmanagement of chronic pain,and for temporary relief ofpain associated with sore and | The Livia is designed forsymptomatic relief andmanagement of chronic pain,and for temporary relief of painassociated with sore and aching |
Comparison Tables - Technological Characteristics
{5}------------------------------------------------
| aching muscles in theshoulder, waist, back, neck,upper extremities (arm) andlower (extremities) leg due tostrain from exercise or normalhousehold work activities andfor temporary relief of painassociated withdysmenorrhea (menstrualcramps).It should be applied to normal,healthy, dry and clean skin ofadult patients, and is to beused for stimulate healthymuscles in order to improveand facilitate muscleperformance. | muscles in the shoulder, waist,back, neck, upper extremities(arm) and lower (extremities)leg due to strain from exerciseor normal household workIt should be applied to normal,healthy, dry and clean skin ofadult patients, and is to be usedfor stimulate healthy muscles inorder to improve and facilitatemuscle performance. | |
|---|---|---|
| Class | II | II |
| ProductCode | NUH | NUH |
| RegulationNumber | 21 CFR 882.5890 | 21 CFR 882.5890 |
Table 2: Basic Unit Characteristics Comparison Table
| Parameter | Proposed | Predicate - | Significant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device | Livia | Differences | |
| 510(k) Number | K163153 | N/A | |
| Device Name and Model Number | LIVIA | LIVIA | N/A |
| Manufacturer | Life Care Ltd | Life Care Ltd | N/A |
| Power Source(s) | 3.7V Lithium- | 3.7V Lithium- | ldentical |
| ion battery | ion battery | ||
| (rechargeable) | (rechargeable) | ||
| Method of Line Current Isolation | Output is | Output is | ldentical |
| electrically | electrically | ||
| disabled when | disabled when | ||
| connect to | connect to | ||
| charger, by | charger, by |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| means ofmicroprocessorcharging circuit | means ofmicroprocessorcharging circuit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Leakage Current- Normal Condition (μΑ) | Batterypowered(< 10μA) | Batterypowered(< 10μA) | Identical | ||
| Patient Leakage Current- Single Fault Condition (μΑ) | Batterypowered(< 50μA) | Batterypowered(< 50μA) | Identical | ||
| Average DC current throughElectrodes when device is on butno pulsesare being applied (µA) | 0 μΑ | 0 µA | Identical | ||
| Number of Output Modes | 1 | 1 | Identical | ||
| Number ofOutputChannels: | Synchronous orAlternatingMethod of ChannelIsolation | 1 | 1 | Identical | |
| N/A | N/A | Identical | |||
| Regulated Current or RegulatedVoltage | Current | Current | Identical | ||
| Software/Firmware/MicroprocessorControl? | Yes | Yes | Identical | ||
| Automatic Overload Trip | Yes | Yes | Identical | ||
| Automatic No-Load Trip | Yes | Yes | Identical | ||
| Automatic Shut Off | Yes | No | |||
| User Override Control | Yes | Yes | Identical | ||
| IndicatorDisplay: | On/Off StatusLow BatteryVoltage/CurrentLevel | Yes | Yes | Identical | |
| Yes | Yes | Identical | |||
| Timer Range (minutes) | The Livia hasno internaltimer, a minordifference, asthere is notreatment timelimitation forusing theLivia—seeInstructions forUse. | The Livia hasno internaltimer, a minordifference, asthere is notreatment timelimitation forusing theLivia—seeInstructions forUse. | Identical | ||
| Compliance with VoluntaryStandards? | IEC 60601-1,IEC60601-1-2, IEC60601-2-10,ISO | IEC 60601-1,IEC 60601-1-2IEC 60601-1-11IEC 60601-2- | Identical |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| 10993-5 and -10 | 10,ISO 10993-5and -10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance with 21 CFR 898? | Yes | Yes | Identical |
| Weight (g) | 36g | 36 g | Identical |
| Dimensions (mm) (W x H x D) | 55 x 55 x 18 | 55 x 55 x 18 | Identical |
| Housing Materials andConstruction | PC/ABS plastic | PC/ABS plastic | Identical |
Table 3: Output Specification for TENS Mode Comparison Table
| Parameter | Proposed Device | Predicate - Livia | Significant Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waveform (e.g., pulsed monophasic, biphasic) | Biphasic, Symmetrical | Biphasic, Symmetrical | Identical | |
| Shape (e.g., rectangular, spike) | Rectangular | Rectangular | Identical | |
| Maximum Output Voltage (volts) (+/-10%) | 50V @ 500Ω64V @ 2kΩ64V @ 2kΩ | 50V @ 500Ω64V @ 2kΩ64V @ 2kΩ | Identical | |
| Maximum Output Current (mA) (+/-10%) | 50 mA @ 500Ω31mA @ 2kΩ6.4mA @ 10kΩ | 50 mA @ 500Ω31mA @ 2kΩ6.4mA @ 10kΩ | Identical | |
| Duration of primary (depolarizing) phase (usec) | 100 µs | 100 µs | Identical | |
| Pulse Duration (both phases) (usec) | 100 µs | 100 µs | Identical | |
| Frequency (Hz) | 100 Hz | 100 Hz | Identical | |
| For multiphasic waveforms only: | Symmetrical phasesYesPhase Duration (include units), (state range, if applicable), (both phases, if asymmetrical)100µs | Symmetrical phasesYesPhase Duration (include units), (state range, if applicable), (both phases, if asymmetrical)100µs | Identical | |
| Net Charge (microcoulombs (µC) per pulse) (If zero, state how this was achieved) | 0uC @ 500Ω | 0uC @ 500Ω | Identical | |
| Maximum Phase Charge, (µC) | 6.4 µC @ 500Ω | 6.4 µC @ 500Ω | Identical | |
| Maximum Current Density, (mA/cm2, r.m.s.) | 0.38 mA/cm2 @500Ω | 0.38 mA/cm2 @500Ω | Identical | |
| Maximum Average Current (average absolute value), mA | 1.19 mW/cm2 @500Ω | 1.19 mW/cm2 @500Ω | Identical | |
| Maximum Average Power Density, (W/cm2), (using smallest conductive | 2.05 mW/cm2 @500Ω | 2.05 mW/cm2 @500Ω | Identical | |
| surface area) | ||||
| NBurst Mode;(i.e., pulsetrains) | (a) Pulses perN/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| (b) Bursts persecond | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| (c) Burstduration(seconds) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| (d) Duty Cycle:Line (b) x Line(c) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
{8}------------------------------------------------
The only difference between the candidate and predicate devices is the addition of dysmenorrhea to the list of the examples of pain relieved and managed by the device. Otherwise, the candidate device is the same as the predicate devices in its major claims. The differences between predicate and candidate device do not affect the safety and effectiveness.
8. Discussion of Non-Clinical Tests Performed for Determination of Substantial Equivalence are as follows:
Not Applicable.
The proposed device is the same as the predicate device. Accordingly, no additional Non-Clinical tests are needed for the proposed device.
9. Discussion of Clinical Tests Performed:
A clinical study was performed to assess the efficacy of the Livia device in treating dysmenorrhea. The study, entitled "A Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Crossover, Prospective, Double-blind Clinical Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Livia® Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Women Suffering from Primary Dysmenorrhea," was a randomized, controlled, multi-center, crossover, doubleblind clinical study assessing the Livia® device in women suffering from primary dysmenorrhea. The study, conducted at four study sites, compared results from the Livia to a sham device. The trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of Livia vs. Sham using 65 Participants at 4 different sites.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Subjects in the study experienced a decline in pain as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The use of Livia succeeded in reducing the VAS score by an average of 28.1 points. The use of the Sham device reduced the VAS score by 17.6 points.
A statistically significant difference between Livia and the Sham device was observed (P<0.0001).
Most subjects used pain relief pills in all treatment sequences. The QoL score was higher in both sequence treatment groups compared to Baseline. The improvement in QoL was higher in sequence A (first Livia, then sham) compared to sequence B (first sham, then Livia).
Usability of the device received good scores by users and no technical problems were detected.
10. Conclusions:
LifeCare considers Livia to be equivalent to the predicate devices listed above. This conclusion is based upon the devices' similarities in principles of operation, technology, materials and indications for use.
§ 882.5890 Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief.
(a)
Identification. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief is a device used to apply an electrical current to electrodes on a patient's skin to treat pain.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).