(54 days)
No
The document explicitly states "Mentions AI, DNN, or ML: Not Found" and the description focuses on standard X-ray imaging and image processing without mentioning AI/ML capabilities.
No
The device is used for radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures, not for direct therapy.
Yes
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section states that the device is used for "radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures." Additionally, the "Device Description" explicitly refers to the Zenition 50 as a "mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system."
No
The device description explicitly states that the system comprises two main hardware components: the C-arm stand and a Mobile View Station (MVS). While it mentions migrating image processing to software, the overall device is a hardware system with integrated software.
Based on the provided information, the Zenition 50 device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic) device.
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states the device is for "radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures." This involves imaging the inside of the body using X-rays, which is an in vivo (within the living body) process, not in vitro (outside the living body, typically involving samples like blood or tissue).
- Device Description: The description confirms it's a "mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system." X-ray imaging is a form of medical imaging, not an IVD process.
- Input Imaging Modality: The input modality is X-ray, which is used for imaging the body directly.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples, reagents, or any of the typical components or processes associated with in vitro diagnostics.
Therefore, the Zenition 50 is a medical imaging device, specifically a mobile C-arm X-ray system, and does not fall under the definition of an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Zenition 50 device is intended to be used and operated by: adequately trained, qualified and authorized health care professionals who have full understanding of the safety information and emergency procedures as well as the capabilities and functions of the device. The device is used for radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures on all patients, except neonates (birth to one month), within the limits of the device. The device is to be used in health care facilities both inside and outside the operating room, sterile as well as non-sterile environment in a variety of procedures. Applications: Orthopedic Neuro Abdominal Vascular Thoracic Cardiac
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
OWB, JAA, OXO
Device Description
The proposed Zenition 50 is a mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system. It is designed for medical use in healthcare facilities where X-ray imaging is needed. The system comprises of two main components: the C-arm stand and a Mobile View Station(MVS)
Mentions image processing
Yes
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
X-ray
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
all patients, except neonates (birth to one month)
Intended User / Care Setting
adequately trained, qualified and authorized health care professionals who have full understanding of the safety information and emergency procedures as well as the capabilities and functions of the device. The device is to be used in health care facilities both inside and outside the operating room, sterile as well as non-sterile environment in a variety of procedures.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
The Zenition 50 did not require clinical study since substantial equivalence to the primary currently marketed and predicate device BV Pulsera was demonstrated with the following attributes: Indication for use; Technological characteristics; Non-clinical performance testing; and Safety and effectiveness.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 892.1650 Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. An image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system is a device intended to visualize anatomical structures by converting a pattern of x-radiation into a visible image through electronic amplification. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). An anthrogram tray or radiology dental tray intended for use with an image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9. In addition, when intended as an accessory to the device described in paragraph (a) of this section, the fluoroscopic compression device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
December 31, 2018
Philips Medical Systems Nederland BV Sumit Kumar Regulatory Approbation Officer Veenpluis 4-6 BEST, NL 5684PC
Re: K183101
Trade/Device Name: Zenition 50 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1650 Regulation Name: Image-Intensified Fluoroscopic X-Ray System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OWB, JAA, OXO Dated: November 1, 2018 Received: November 7, 2018
Dear Sumit Kumar:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
1
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Hole 2. Nils
for Robert A. Ochs, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 |
---|---|
Food and Drug Administration | Expiration Date: 06/30/2020 |
See PRA Statement below. | |
510(k) Number (if known) | K183101 |
Device Name | Zenition 50 |
Indications for Use (Describe) | The Zenition 50 device is intended to be used and operated by: adequately trained, qualified and authorized health care professionals who have full understanding of the safety information and emergency procedures as well as the capabilities and functions of the device. The device is used for radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures on all patients, except neonates (birth to one month), within the limits of the device. The device is to be used in health care facilities both inside and outside the operating room, sterile as well as non-sterile environment in a variety of procedures. |
Applications: | OrthopedicNeuroAbdominalVascularThoracicCardiac |
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. |
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
PSC
3
510(k) Summary
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is prepared in accordance with 21 CFR §807.92.
Date Prepared: November 1, 2018
| Manufacturer: | Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V.
Veenpluis 4-6
5684 PC Best
The Netherlands
Establishment Registration Number: 3003768277 | |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Primary
Contact
Person: | Sumit Kumar
Regulatory Approbation Officer
Phone: +91 7028039288
E-mail: sumit.kumar_3@philips.com | |
| Secondary
Contact
Person: | Sonavane, Neena Sandeep
Regulatory Affairs Manager
Phone: +91 8446020023
E-mail: neena.sonavane@philips.com | |
| Device: | Trade Name: | Zenition 50 |
| | Classification Name: | Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system |
| | Classification Regulation: | 21CFR §892.1650 |
| | Classification Panel: | 90-Radiology |
| | Device Class: | Class II |
| | Primary Product Code: | OWB |
| | Secondary Product Code: | JAA, OXO |
| Primary
Predicate
Device: | Trade Name: | BV Pulsera |
| | Manufacturer: | Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. |
| | 510(k) Clearance: | K010435 |
| | Classification Name: | Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system |
| | Classification Regulation: | 21CFR §892.1650 |
| | Classification Panel: | 90-Radiology |
| | Device Class: | Class II |
| | Product Code: | OWB; JAA; OXO |
| Reference
device: | Trade Name: | Veradius Unity |
| | Manufacturer | Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V |
| | 510(k) Clearance: | K142708 |
| | Classification Name: | Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system |
| | Classification Regulation: | 21CFR §892.1650 |
| | Classification Panel: | 90-Radiology |
| | Device Class: | Class II |
| | Product Code: | OWB; JAA; OXO |
| Device description: | The proposed Zenition 50 is a mobile, diagnostic X-ray imaging and viewing system. It is designed for medical use in healthcare facilities where X-ray imaging is needed. The system comprises of two main components: the C-arm stand and a Mobile View Station(MVS) | |
| Indications for Use: | The proposed Zenition 50 is intended to be used and operated by: adequately trained, qualified and authorized health care professionals who have full understanding of the safety information and emergency procedures as well as the capabilities and functions of the device.
The device is used for radiological guidance and visualization during diagnostic, interventional and surgical procedures on all patients, except neonates (birth to one month), within the limits of the device.
The device is to be used in health care facilities both inside and outside the operating room, sterile as well as non-sterile environment in a variety of procedures.
Applications:
Orthopedic Neuro Abdominal Vascular Thoracic Cardiac | |
| Fundamental Scientific Technology: | The proposed Zenition 50 employs the same basic construction and fundamental scientific technology as the currently marketed and predicate BV Pulsera. The technology used in the development of the major components of the proposed Zenition 50, which includes X-ray generator, X-ray tube housing assembly, and Image detection system is identical to the currently marketed and predicate BV Pulsera. See the below table for the comparison of the major components of the proposed Zenition 50 and the currently marketed and predicate BV Pulsera. | |
| | The outcome of this comparison demonstrates that the minor differences in the technological | |
4
characteristics do not affect the safety or effectiveness of the Zenition 50 when compared to the currently marketed and predicate BV Pulsera.
| Technological characteristics comparison of the currently marketed predicate device, BV
Pulsera versus the proposed Zenition 50 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Component | |||
/feature | Currently | ||
market BV | |||
Pulsera | Proposed Zenition 50 | Conclusion | |
X-ray | |||
Generator | iXion HF | ||
Generator | |||
Model: 10359400 | iXion HF Generator | ||
Model: 10359400 | Identical. | ||
X-ray tube | Model: RTM 780 | ||
H (Type RO-0306) | Model : RTM 780 H | ||
(Type RO-0306) | Identical. | ||
X-ray housing assembly | iXion Monoblock IV with X-ray tube RO-0306 | iXion Monoblock V with X-ray tube RO-0306 | |
Similar with minor change in | |||
monoblock design for providing | |||
more clearance to the floor. | |||
The monoblock design has been | |||
updated to reduce the height with | |||
3.5cm, and thus improves clearance | |||
between the tank and the floor which | |||
resulting in more space to move. In | |||
addition, the filtration has been | |||
reduced to lower the amount of | |||
power necessary for the same dose. | |||
The updated monoblock is evaluated | |||
in risk management. The change | |||
does not introduce new risks. This | |||
change was shown to be compliant | |||
with the international and FDA | |||
recognized standards IEC60601-1, | |||
IEC60601-2-43 and IEC60601-2-54 | |||
for basic safety and essential | |||
performance. Hence, this change | |||
does not impact the safety and | |||
effectiveness of the Device. Thus, | |||
demonstrating substantial | |||
equivalence. | |||
Image Intensifier 9" | 23HRC | 23HRC | Identical. |
Image Intensifier 12" | 31GG | 31GG | Identical |
II Laser alignment tool | Z-LAD 9 Inch | ||
Z-LAD 12 Inch | Z-LAD 9 Inch | ||
Z-LAD 12 Inch | Identical | ||
Beam Limiting Device | CoRa | ||
9890 010 23201 | Collimator IITV | ||
459801200241 | A new collimator has been designed | ||
such that it reuses the design of | |||
existing reference device Veradius | |||
Unity (K142708) FD15 (PX2630Sv) | |||
collimator with the only exception | |||
the square fixed diaphragm is | |||
removed to match the format for | |||
IITV9" and IITV12". There is no | |||
change in the functional | |||
specification compared to predicate | |||
device. All other parts of the | |||
collimator are identical. | |||
This change was shown to be | |||
compliant with the international and | |||
FDA recognized | |||
Laser | |||
Alignment | |||
tool | Tube Laser | ||
Aiming Device | Tube Laser Aiming | ||
Device | essential performance. Hence, this | ||
does not impact safety or | |||
effectiveness of the device Thus, | |||
demonstrating substantially | |||
equivalent. | |||
Changed to fit in new collimator. | |||
Functional specification are similar | |||
compared to predicate device. This | |||
tube laser unit is reused from the | |||
reference device Veradius Unity | |||
(K142708). | |||
Hence, this change do not impact | |||
the safety or effectiveness of the | |||
Device. Thus, demonstrating | |||
substantial equivalence | |||
Mobile C-arm | |||
Stand | BV Pulsera Stand | Pulsera R3.1 Stand | The mechanical interfaces have |
been updated for the updated | |||
monoblock and the stand | |||
touchscreen. These changes are | |||
assessed in risk management, and | |||
they did not introduce new risks. | |||
The changes was also shown to be | |||
compliant with the FDA recognized | |||
standard IEC60601-1 for basic | |||
safety and essential performance. | |||
Therefore, the change does not | |||
impact safety and effectiveness. | |||
Thus, demonstrating substantial | |||
equivalence. | |||
Mobile | |||
Viewing | |||
Station | MVS BV Family | ||
R2 | MVS BV Family R3 | The MVS has been changed to | |
match the updated interfaces from | |||
the System architecture and room | |||
interface changes. These changes | |||
are assessed in risk management, | |||
and they did not introduce new risks. | |||
The changes was also shown to be | |||
compliant with the FDA recognized | |||
standard IEC60601-1 for basic | |||
safety and essential performance. | |||
Therefore, the change does not | |||
impact safety and effectiveness. | |||
Thus, demonstrating substantial | |||
equivalence | |||
System | |||
architecture | Current System | ||
architecture | Improved system | ||
architecture with PC | |||
platform | |||
• Solved obsolescence | These changes were assessed in risk | ||
management, and they did not | |||
introduce new risks. This change | |||
was shown to be compliant with the | |||
international and FDA recognized | |||
hardware and software by moving to state of the art computing hardware and corresponding interconnects. Migrated system software to the new computing hardware Migrated image processing from hardware to software implementation Integrated internal distributed components related to power functions into the mains control unit to simplify the design Integrated wireless network connection design to simplify configuration and setting to work by service engineers | standards IEC60601-1, IEC60601-2-43 and IEC60601-2-54 for basic safety and essential performance, IEC60601-1-2 for Electromagnetic compatibility, IEC62366 for application of usability engineering and the FDA Performance Standard for Diagnostic X-Ray Systems and Their Major Components (21 CFR 1020.30 / 1020.32). Image processing performance is compared by means of an image quality performance comparison with the predicate device and found equal or improved, see Appendix A38 . | ||
This change does not affect safety or effectiveness of the device. Thus, demonstrating substantial equivalence. | |||
ClearGuide and color coding | Not Present | Introduction of ClearGuide and color coding | These visual aids are ease-of-use improvements and improve communication in the OR between surgeon and operator. These features are reused from the reference device Veradius Unity (K142708). |
The changes do not introduce new risks or change any of the existing risks compared to the predicate device. | |||
This change does not affect safety or effectiveness of the device. Thus, demonstrating substantial equivalence. | |||
C-arm Stand user interface | C-arm Stand user interface based on hard keys and a small monochrome display | C-arm Stand touch screen user interface | The hard-key based interface on the predicate device has been replaced with a touch-screen based stand user interface This feature is reused from the reference device Veradius Unity (K142708). This change was shown to be compliant with the international and FDA recognized standards IEC60601-1, IEC60601- |
2-43 and IEC60601-2-54 for basic | |||
safety and essential performance, | |||
IEC60601-1-2 for Electromagnetic | |||
compatibility, | |||
IEC62366 | |||
for | |||
application of usability engineering. | |||
This change does not affect safety or | |||
effectiveness of the device. Thus, | |||
demonstrating | |||
substantial | |||
Manual | |||
Outline | Not Present | Manual outlining | equivalence |
With this so-called Manual Outline | |||
function, it is possible to draw lines | |||
and dots on an overlay of the clinical | |||
image with help of the finger, stylus | |||
pen or mouse. It is not related to | |||
diagnostics. This feature is reused | |||
from the reference device Veradius | |||
Unity (K142708). | |||
The changes do not introduce new | |||
risks or change any of the existing | |||
risks compared to the predicate | |||
device. | |||
This change does not affect safety or | |||
effectiveness of the device. Thus, | |||
substantial | |||
demonstrating | |||
equivalence. | |||
Wireless | |||
footswitch | Not Present | Wireless footswitch | Next to the wired footswitch and |
optional wireless footswitch can be | |||
used with the system. This wireless | |||
footswitch is reused from reference | |||
device Veradius Unity (K142708). | |||
The change does not introduce new | |||
risks, but only minor update to | |||
existing risks compared to the | |||
predicate device. | |||
This change does not affect safety or | |||
effectiveness of the device. Thus, | |||
demonstrating | |||
substantial | |||
equivalence. | |||
DICOM | |||
connectivity | Current DICOM | ||
connectivity | Improved DICOM | ||
connectivity workflow | |||
· Easier selection of | |||
patient data for | |||
export | |||
• Introduced | |||
unattended network | |||
transfer of export | |||
jobs | |||
• Integrated workflow | |||
for export to local | The improvements are ease-of-use | ||
improvements, fully compliant with | |||
the DICOM standard and do not | |||
impact clinical functionality. The | |||
changes are shown to be compliant | |||
with the international and FDA | |||
recognized standard IEC62366 for | |||
application of usability engineering. | |||
Therefore, this change does not | |||
impact safety or effectiveness of the | |||
media (USB and | |||
DICOM DVD) | |||
• Improved workflow | |||
for multimodality | |||
viewer functionality | |||
• Improved DICOM | |||
transfer speed | demonstrating | ||
device. | |||
Thus, | |||
substantially equivalent | |||
X-ray tube | |||
heat | |||
management | Current X-ray | ||
tube heat | |||
management | • Improved | ||
presentation to the | |||
user of tube and oil | |||
heating information | |||
· Reduced · · | |||
energy | |||
waste in non-x-ray | |||
(pump, stator) | These | ||
improvements | |||
allow | |||
minimizing | |||
wasted | |||
energy by updating the control | |||
functions for the oil pump and stator | |||
control and improve feedback to the | |||
user on tube and oil heat status. The | |||
changes have been evaluated in risk | |||
management, and they do not lead to | |||
new risks. The changes are shown to | |||
be compliant with the international | |||
and FDA recognized standard | |||
IEC62366 for application of | |||
usability engineering. This change | |||
impact | |||
clinical | |||
does | |||
not | |||
functionality. | |||
Therefore, this change does not | |||
impact safety or effectiveness of the | |||
device. | |||
Thus, demonstrating | |||
substantial equivalence. | |||
User Interface | |||
Mobile | |||
viewing | |||
station | Current User | ||
Interface Mobile | |||
viewing station | New identity look for | ||
MVS-UI. The | |||
Graphical User | |||
Interface look and feel | |||
of the mobile viewing | |||
station is changed to | |||
the Philips New | |||
Experience Identity | |||
look and feel. | These features are to improve the | ||
look and feel of the device and does | |||
not impact clinical functionality. | |||
The changes have been evaluated in | |||
risk management, and they do not | |||
lead to new risks. The changes are | |||
shown to be compliant with the | |||
international and FDA recognized | |||
standard IEC62366 for application | |||
of usability engineering. | |||
Therefore, this change does not | |||
impact safety or effectiveness of the | |||
Thus. demonstrating | |||
device. | |||
substantially equivalent. | |||
Wired | |||
Footswitch | |||
and remote | |||
control unit | Current Wired | ||
Footswitch and | |||
remote control | |||
unit | The current wired | ||
remote | |||
footswitch, footswitch, | |||
unit | |||
control | |||
are | |||
replaced with a new | |||
wired footswitch and | |||
remote control | |||
new | The current wired footswitch and | ||
remote control unit are replaced | |||
with a new wired footswitch and | |||
new remote control with identical | |||
functionality. This change does not | |||
impact clinical functionality. These | |||
features are to improve the look and | |||
with identical | |||
functionality | feel of the device and does not | ||
impact clinical functionality. The | |||
changes have been evaluated in risk | |||
management, and they do not lead to | |||
new risks. The changes are shown to | |||
be compliant with the international | |||
and FDA recognized standard IEC | |||
62366 for application of usability | |||
engineering. Therefore, this change | |||
does not impact safety or | |||
effectiveness of the device. Thus, | |||
demonstrating | |||
substantial | |||
equivalence. | |||
RAD | |||
(radiography) | RAD support | ||
(Optional) | RAD not supported | The removal of RAD (radiography) | |
is evaluated in risk management The | |||
change does not introduce new risks | |||
Therefore; this change does not | |||
impact safety or effectiveness of the | |||
device. Thus, demonstrating | |||
substantial equivalence. | |||
Live DVD | |||
Recording | Live DVD | ||
recording support | |||
(Optional) | Live DVD recording | ||
option not supported | The removal of Live DVD recording | ||
is evaluated in risk management The | |||
change does not introduce new risks | |||
Therefore; this change does not | |||
impact safety or effectiveness of the | |||
device. Thus, demonstrating | |||
substantial equivalence. | |||
Security | |||
features | Current Security | ||
features | Introduction of the | ||
security features | |||
• Local user account | |||
management | |||
o Function improved | |||
to enable a | |||
username/passwor | |||
d combination. | |||
• Network time | |||
synchronization | |||
o Different | |||
implementation only | |||
• Audit trail | |||
• White listing | |||
• DIACAP hardening | |||
• Disk encryption | |||
• FIPS 140-2 | These features are to improve | ||
security of the device and do not | |||
impact clinical functionality. | |||
Therefore, this change does not | |||
impact safety or effectiveness of the | |||
device. | |||
Thus, demonstrating substantial | |||
equivalence. | |||
Introduction of | |||
metal | |||
exclusion | Not present | Metal exclusion added | The feature is to minimize the |
impact of added metal in the X-ray | |||
image by excluding metal (black | |||
exclusion) from the automatic | |||
exposure control. It has the same | |||
design as the currently available | |||
BodySmart (white exclusion) | |||
function of the predicate device. | |||
This change was shown to be | |||
compliant with the international and | |||
FDA recognized standards | |||
IEC60601-2-43 and IEC60601-2-54 | |||
for basic safety and essential | |||
performance. Thus, demonstrating | |||
substantial equivalence | |||
System service | |||
functions | Current System | ||
service functions | • BV-scope field | ||
service infrastructure | |||
is replaced by Philips | |||
Support Connect field | |||
service infrastructure. | |||
• Introduction of PSC | |||
implies also that the | |||
Service UI is located | |||
on the target machine | |||
itself, and thus | |||
enabling access to | |||
field service | |||
functionality via the | |||
MVS-UI. | |||
• Using CAT tool to | |||
view logging. | |||
• All field service | |||
procedures are | |||
migrated to the PSC | |||
based field service | |||
infrastructure | The change is only impacting the | ||
service interface and has no clinical | |||
impact. Therefore this change does | |||
not impact safety or effectiveness of | |||
the device | |||
Thus, demonstrating substantial | |||
equivalence | |||
Room | |||
Interface | Not Present | External x-ray and | |
power indication | |||
interface | This feature is to optionally allow | ||
connecting an external x-ray and | |||
power lamp to the system and does | |||
not impact clinical functionality. | |||
Therefore, this change does not | |||
impact safety or effectiveness of the | |||
device. | |||
Thus, demonstrating | |||
substantial | |||
equivalence. | |||
Audible | |||
signals | Audible signals | ||
with fixed volume | Speaker with volume | ||
control added in the | |||
Stand | This feature is to allow control of the | ||
volume produced by the system for | |||
audible signals. This change does | |||
not impact clinical functionality. | |||
Therefore, this change does not | |||
Analogue video out | original | Analogue video out no longer supported | The analog video-out was used to connect external monitors. This is an outdated video interface and has been removed. This change does not impact clinical functionality. Therefore, this change does not impact safety or effectiveness of the device. Thus, demonstrating substantial equivalence. |
impact safety or effectiveness of the device. | |||
Thus, demonstrating substantial equivalence. |
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Non-clinical performance testing has been performed on the proposed Zenition 50 and demonstrates Summary of Non-Clinical compliance with the following International and FDA-recognized consensus standards and FDA Performance guidance documents. Data:
- IEC 62304 Medical device software Software life cycle processes (Edition 1.1, 2015). FDA/CDRH ● recognition number 13-79.
- ISO 14971 Medical devices Application of risk management to medical devices (Edition 2.0, . corrected version, 2007). FDA/CDRH recognition number 5-40.
- IEC 60601-2-43 Particular requirements for the safety of X-Ray equipment for interventional . procedures (Edition 2.1, 2017). FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-308.
- IEC 60601-2-54, Medical Electrical Equipment- Part 2-54: Particular Requirements for the Basic . Safety and Essential Performance of X-Ray Equipment for Radiography and Radioscopy (Edition 1.1 2015). FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-296.
- IEC 60601-2-28-Medical electrical equipment Part 2-28: Particular requirements for the basic ● safety and essential performance of X-ray tube assemblies for medical diagnosis (Edition 2.0 2010) FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-204.
- IEC 60601-1, Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance (Edition 3.1). FDA/CDRH recognition number 19-4.
- IEC 60601-1-2, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and tests (Edition 4.0 2014). FDA/CDRH recognition number 19-8.
- IEC 60601-1-3, Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-3: General Requirements for Basic Safety and ● Essential Performance .- Collateral Standard: Radiation Protection in Diagnostic X-Ray Equipment. (Edition 2.1 2013). FDA/CDRH recognition number 12-269.
- IEC 60601-1-6, Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-6: General Requirements for Basic Safety and ● Essential Performance- Collateral Standard: Usability (Edition 3.1 2013). FDA/CDRH recognition number 5-89.
- IEC 62366 IEC Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices (Edition 1.0 2015). FDA/CDRH recognition number 5-114
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff -Pediatric information for x-ray imaging device premarket notifications (document number 1771)
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for . Software Contained in Medical Devices, May 11, 2005 (document number 337).
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices(document number (1757)
- . Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices - Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff (document number 1825).
- Radio frequency wireless technology in medical devices- Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (document number 1618).
Non-clinical validation testing has been performed to cover the intended use, commercial claims, service, user needs, effectiveness of safety measures, instructions for use, and usability testing with representative intended users
Non-clinical verification and validation test results demonstrate that the Zenition 50 :
- Complies with the aforementioned international and FDA recognized consensus standards and FDA guidance documents.
- Meets the acceptance criteria and is adequate for its intended use.
14
| Summary of
Clinical
Performance
Data: | The Zenition 50 did not require clinical study since substantial equivalence to the primary currently
marketed and predicate device BV Pulsera was demonstrated with the following attributes: |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Indication for use; Technological characteristics; Non-clinical performance testing; and Safety and effectiveness. |
| Substantial
Equivalence
Conclusion: | The Zenition 50 is substantial equivalent to the currently marketed predicate device BV Pulsera K010435 in terms of indications for use, fundamental scientific technology and safety and effectiveness.
Additionally, substantial equivalence was demonstrated by non-clinical performance tests provided in this 510(k) premarket notification. These tests demonstrate that Zenition 50 complies with the requirements specified in the international and FDA-recognized consensus standards and guidance, and is as safe and effective as its predicate device without raising any new safety and/or effectiveness concerns. |