(86 days)
The OrthoGold 100 is intended for the activation of connective tissue.
The OrthoGold 100™ is a pulsed acoustic wave device. It includes an electrically powered generator to generate transient compressed air that rapidly expands to create the acoustic waves, which in turn are propagated through a water-filled coupling membrane attached to the hand-held applicator. The hand-held applicator reflects the acoustic waves towards the treatment area through a silicone membrane and ultrasound transmission gel.
This document is a 510(k) summary for the OrthoGold 100™ therapeutic massager. It does not provide information specific to an AI/ML device, therefore, many of the typical acceptance criteria and study details for such devices are not applicable.
Here's the breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not specify quantitative acceptance criteria in the typical sense of a human-in-the-loop or standalone AI performance study (e.g., specific sensitivity, specificity, or AUC thresholds). Instead, the acceptance is based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through various performance tests.
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Device meets design specifications. | Verification and validation testing was performed and demonstrated that the OrthoGold 100™ meets the design specifications. |
| Device is safe and effective for its intended use. | All tests required by the verification and validation plan were completed and passed. |
| Software is validated to an appropriate level of concern. | The OrthoGold 100™ software was validated and demonstrated to be of a Moderate level of concern. |
| Risks are mitigated to an acceptable level. | Hazard analysis / risk management was performed and demonstrated that all risks are mitigated to an acceptable level. |
| Conformance to general safety requirements. | The OrthoGold 100 was tested and demonstrated to conform to the general safety requirements of IEC 60601-1:2005. |
| Conformance to electromagnetic compatibility requirements. | The OrthoGold 100 was tested and demonstrated to conform to the electromagnetic compatibility requirements of IEC 60601-1-2:2014 (4th Ed.) and 60601-2-36. |
| Applicator displacement, force, and penetration depth are equivalent to predicate device. | In-vitro testing was performed to determine applicator displacement, force and penetration depth and was demonstrated to be equivalent to the AW module of the Dermablate predicate device. Maximum penetration depth of 25.4 mm at energy level 16 (predicate: 30mm). Energy flow density PIIT [mJ/mm2] 0.00017 - 0.04403 at energy level 1 - 16 (predicate: 0.018-0.25). Peak compressional acoustic pressure pc [MPa] 9.27 at energy level 16 (predicate: 13.4). Other parameters shown to be "Similar" or "Equivalent" to predicate. |
| Probe cover and transport verification/validation performed. | Probe cover testing and transport verification and validation was also conducted. |
| Overall substantial equivalence to predicate device. | The performance testing demonstrated that the OrthoGold 100 is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
Not applicable. This device is a therapeutic massager, not an AI/ML diagnostic tool that would typically use a "test set" of patient data for performance evaluation. The testing involved in-vitro performance measurements, electrical safety, and electromagnetic compatibility.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. As this is not an AI/ML diagnostic device, there was no need for experts to establish ground truth on a test set of medical images or patient data.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
Not applicable. No test set requiring adjudication of ground truth was used.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML assisted device for human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is a physical medical device (therapeutic massager), not a standalone algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used
For the in-vitro performance testing, the "ground truth" was established by objective measurements against known physical standards and comparison data from the predicate device. For example, measurements of applicator displacement, force, and penetration depth would have physical accuracy.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This product is a physical device, not an AI/ML model that requires a training set. The "training" for such a device would refer to its engineering, design, and manufacturing processes.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. As above, this is not an AI/ML device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health and Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters 'FDA' in a blue square, followed by the words 'U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION' in blue text.
December 21, 2018
Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC % Jennifer Daudelin, MSJ Regulatory Consultant III M Squared Associates, Inc. 575 Eighth Avenue, Suite 1212 New York, New York 10018
Re: K182682
Trade/Device Name: OrthoGold 100TM Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.5660 Regulation Name: Therapeutic Massager Regulatory Class: Class I Product Code: ISA Dated: September 26, 2018 Received: September 26, 2018
Dear Jennifer Daudelin:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Vivek J. Pinto -S
for Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K182682
Device Name OrthoGold 100
Indications for Use (Describe) The OrthoGold 100 is intended for the activation of connective tissue.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- | -- |
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC
OrthoGold 100™
The following information is provided as required by 21 CFR § 807.87 for the Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC 510(k) premarket notification. In response to the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following is a summary of the safety and effectiveness information upon which the substantial equivalence determination is based.
| Sponsor: | Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC251 Heritage WalkWoodstock, GA 30188 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact: | Jennifer A. Daudelin, M.S.J.M Squared Associates, Inc.575 Eighth Avenue, Suite 1212New York, NY 10018Ph: 703-562-9800 x251Fax: 703-562-9797Email: jdaudelin@msquaredassociates.com | |||
| Date Prepared: | September 24, 2018 | |||
| Proposed Class: | I | |||
| Proprietary Name: | OrthoGold 100TM | |||
| Common Name: | Therapeutic Massager | |||
| Classification Name: | Massager, Therapeutic, Electric | |||
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 890.5660 | |||
| Product Codes: | ISA | |||
| Predicate Device(s): | ||||
| Manufacturer | Device Name | 510(k) Number | Procode | Class |
| Asclepion LaserTechnologies GmbH | Dermablate Effect | K081541 | ISA | I |
Indications for Use
The OrthoGold 100™ is intended for the activation of connective tissue.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Device Description
The OrthoGold 100™ is a pulsed acoustic wave device. It includes an electrically powered generator to generate transient compressed air that rapidly expands to create the acoustic waves, which in turn are propagated through a water-filled coupling membrane attached to the hand-held applicator. The hand-held applicator reflects the acoustic waves towards the treatment area through a silicone membrane and ultrasound transmission gel.
Performance Data
Verification and validation testing was performed and demonstrated that the OrthoGold 100™ meets the design specifications and is safe and effective for its intended use. All tests required by the verification and validation plan were completed and passed. The OrthoGold 100™ software was validated and demonstrated to be of a Moderate level of concern; while hazard analysis / risk management was performed and demonstrated that all risks are mitigated to an acceptable level. The OrthoGold 100 was tested and demonstrated to conform to the general safety requirements of IEC 60601-1:2005; as well as the electromagnetic compatibility requirements of IEC 60601-1-2:2014 (4th Ed.) and 60601-2-36. In-vitro testing was performed to determine applicator displacement, force and penetration depth and was demonstrated to be equivalent to the AW module of the Dermablate predicate device. In addition, probe cover testing and transport verification and validation was also conducted. The performance testing demonstrated that the OrthoGold 100 is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
| Product Characteristic | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| OrthoGold 100TM | Dermablate Effect | ||
| 510(k) Number | To be assigned | K081541 | NA |
| Indications for Use | Activation of connective tissue | Activation of connective tissue | Identical |
| Modes of Action | Unfocused pressure pulses | Radial (unfocused) pressurewaves, or extracorporeal pulseactivation respectively | Similar |
| Mechanisms of Action | Extracorporeally inducedunfocused pressure pulses | Pneumatically generatedvibrations + unfocused pressurepulses | Equivalent |
| Maximum and Minimumintensity settings | 1 to 16 | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Subject Device | Predicate Device | Comparison | |
| Product Characteristic | OrthoGold 100™ | Dermablate Effect | |
| Number and size oftreatment applicator heads | OP155Size: 230 x ø 70 mm | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Maximum and minimumdisplacements ofapplicator heads | Not Applicable | Specific Value Not Available | NA |
| Type of application (e.g.,continuous vibration at afixed frequency); | Continuous at various frequencies | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Maximum and minimumvibration frequency | Frequency of 1 - 8 Hz in steps of0.5 Hz | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Driving Power | High voltage 2 - 7 kVCapacitor: 0,2 uF | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Power Supply | 115 VAC | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Maximum applicatorforce | Not Applicable | Specific Value Not Available | NA |
| Maximum applicatordisplacement | Not Applicable | Specific Value Not Available | NA |
| Maximum penetrationdepth | 25.4 mm at energy level 16 | 30mm (3cm) | Similar |
| Energy flow densityPIIT [mJ/mm2] | 0.00017 - 0.04403at energy level 1 - 16 | 0.018-0.25 | Similar |
| Operating mode | Continuous | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Projectile mass (g) | Not Applicable | Specific Value Not Available | NA |
| Pulse repeat rate (1/s) | 1 - 8 Hz | 1-11 Hz | Similar |
| Number of pulses (minand max) | 500 - 2000 | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Maximum operatingtemperature | Room temperature | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Type of acoustic wavegeneration | Electro hydraulic, spark gapunder water caused by dischargeof high voltage condensers | Ballistic technology, pressurizedair pulses accelerate a projectilewithin a guiding tube | Similar |
| Peak compressionalacoustic pressurepc [MPa] | 9.27at energy level 16 | 13.4 | Similar |
| Peak rarefactionalacoustic pressurepcr[MPa] | -1.52at energy level 16 | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Description of the spatialdistribution of theacoustic pressure andintensity | Unfocused acoustic pressure field,see pressure measurements | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Positive peak pressureamplitude (MPa)pc [MPa] | 0.43 - 9.27at energy level 1 - 16 | 13.4 | Similar |
| Subject Device | Predicate Device | Comparison | |
| Product Characteristic | OrthoGold 100™ | Dermablate Effect | |
| Negative peak pressureamplitude (MPa)$pcr[MPa]$ | -0.17 to -1.52at energy level 1 - 16 | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Derived focal acousticpulse energy (mJ)$EbT [mJ]$ | 0.022 - 2.278at energy level 1 - 16 | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Derived pulse intensityintegral, integrated overtotal temporal integrationlimits$PIIT [mJ/mm2]$ | 0.00017 - 0.04403at energy level 1 - 16 | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Rise time (ns)(10% - 90%) tr [us] | 1.89 - 0.28at energy level 1 - 16 | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Compressional pulseduration (us)$tFWHMpc [uS]$ | 1.23 - 0.77at energy level 1 - 16 | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
The table below compares the OrthoGold 100 characteristics to the predicate device.
Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC OrthoGold100TM
510(k) Summary Page 2 of 4
{5}------------------------------------------------
Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC OrthoGold100TM
{6}------------------------------------------------
Technological Characteristics and Substantial Equivalence
The OrthoGold 100™ has the same indications for use and similar design features as compared with the predicate system. The bench testing demonstrates that the performance characteristics of the OrthoGold 100™ are equivalent to those of other legally marketed therapeutic massagers, and therefore supports a determination of Substantial Equivalence for the proposed indications for use. Any differences between the subject and predicate device would not render the device NSE, affect the safety or effectiveness, or raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.
§ 890.5660 Therapeutic massager.
(a)
Identification. A therapeutic massager is an electrically powered device intended for medical purposes, such as to relieve minor muscle aches and pains.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 890.9.