(174 days)
Unknown
No
The description focuses on the hardware components and the physical process of delivering RF energy and cooling, with no mention of AI or ML for analysis, decision-making, or control.
Yes.
The device is intended for the creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue, which is a therapeutic intervention aimed at treating medical conditions.
No
The device's intended use is for the creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue, which is a therapeutic intervention, not a diagnostic one.
No
The device description explicitly lists multiple hardware components including a generator, pump, probes, cannula, and footswitch. While software is mentioned in the performance studies, the device is clearly a system with significant hardware components.
Based on the provided information, the Polaris RF Ablation System is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic) device.
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is "for the creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue." This describes a therapeutic procedure performed directly on a patient's body, not a test performed on a sample taken from the body.
- Device Description: The components listed are all designed for delivering energy and managing the procedure within the body (generator, probes, pump, etc.). There are no components mentioned for analyzing biological samples.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: The description does not mention any analysis of biological samples (blood, urine, tissue, etc.) or the use of reagents, which are hallmarks of IVD devices.
- Anatomical Site: The target is "Nervous tissue," indicating a direct interaction with the patient's anatomy.
IVD devices are used to examine specimens derived from the human body to provide information for diagnostic, monitoring, or compatibility purposes. The Polaris RF Ablation System is a therapeutic device used to treat conditions by creating lesions in nervous tissue.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Polaris RF Ablation System is intended for the creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue.
Product codes
GXD, GXI
Device Description
The Polaris RF Ablation System includes the following components:
- Polaris Radiofrequency Generator and Desk Stand
- Polaris Pump, Pump Cable and Desk Stand
- Polaris Standard Connector Hub / Polaris Cooled Connector Hub
- Polaris Footswitch
- Polaris Cooled RF Probe Kit:
i. Polaris Cooled RF Ablation Probe
ii. Polaris Tube Kit
iii. Polaris Introducer - Polaris Single-Use RF Probe
- Polaris Reusable RF Probe
- Polaris RF Cannula
The Polaris RF Ablation System is intended for the creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue. The system is designed to deliver controlled RF energy from the Polaris RF Generator to target tissues via the Polaris RF Probes for standard RF procedures or Polaris Cooled RF Probes for cooled RF procedures. RF energy is applied based on the configured RF generator settings to create the desired lesions in the target tissue. The generator also delivers low frequency stimulation pulses during procedures.
During standard RF procedures, the Polaris RF Probe is used with a compatible Polaris RF Cannula to enable RF energy delivery via the active electrode to the target tissues. During cooled RF procedures with Polaris Cooled RF Probes, the system integrates a cooling mechanism by internally circulating water through the probes using the Polaris Pump Unit. This cooling results in minimal charring of the surrounding tissue and also prevents tissue from adhering to the electrodes. This allows for larger and more consistent ablation volumes to be achieved.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Nervous tissue
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Physicians familiar with RF lesion techniques
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Performance testing was completed to demonstrate substantial equivalence of the Polaris RF Ablation System and relevant system components to the identified predicate devices in Table 7.1. The system components were subjected to the verification and validation testing listed in Table 7.4.
Polaris Re-Usable RF Probe
- Mechanical Testing:
- Test Method Summary: Performed Temperature Test, Pull Test, Cleaning and Sterilization Reuse Test, Mechanical Reuse Test, Mechanical Test (Flexion), Continuity Test, Functional Test.
- Results: All samples passed acceptance criteria, confirming compliance with IEC 60601-2-2:2009 and supporting substantial equivalence.
- Electrical Testing:
- Test Method Summary: Electrical verification by comparison with Polaris Standard Single-Use Probe to assess electrical stress resistance.
- Results: Verified to meet requirements of IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012 and IEC 60601-2-2:2009, supporting substantial equivalence.
Biocompatibility
- Test Method Summary: Demonstrated through comparisons to similar legally marketed devices per ISO 10993-1 and FDA guidance.
- Results: Confirmed compliance with ISO 10993-1 requirements and supported substantial equivalence.
Packaging
- Test Method Summary: Ship testing performed to ensure integrity through shipping and handling.
- Results: All packaging met relevant requirements, supporting substantial equivalence.
Cleaning and Sterilization
- Test Method Summary: Validated recommended reprocessing methods in Instructions for Use to achieve a Sterility Assurance Level of 10-6.
- Results: Verified to meet AAMI TIR12, AAMI TIR30, ANSI/AAMI ST81 requirements and FDA guidance, supporting substantial equivalence.
Polaris Single-Use RF Probe
- Mechanical Testing:
- Test Method Summary: Performed Temperature Test, Pull Test, Durability Test, Mechanical Test (Flexion), Continuity Test, Functional Test.
- Results: All samples passed acceptance criteria, confirming compliance with IEC 60601-2-2:2009 and supporting substantial equivalence.
- Electrical Testing:
- Test Method Summary: Performed High Frequency Leakage Current Test - Cable, High Frequency Dielectric Strength Test – Cable, High Frequency Dielectric Strength Test - Handle, Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test - Cable, Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test - Handle, Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test – Connector.
- Results: All samples passed acceptance criteria, confirming compliance with IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012 and IEC 60601-2-2:2009, supporting substantial equivalence.
Biocompatibility
- Test Method Summary: Demonstrated through comparisons to similar legally marketed devices per ISO 10993-1 and FDA guidance.
- Results: Confirmed compliance with ISO 10993-1 requirements and supported substantial equivalence.
Packaging
- Test Method Summary: Ship testing performed to ensure integrity through shipping and handling. Seal strength and sterile barrier integrity validated per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 and 11607-2 over shelf life.
- Results: Met relevant requirements, confirming compliance with ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 and 11607-2, supporting substantial equivalence.
Polaris RF Cannula
- Mechanical Testing:
- Test Method Summary: Performed Positive Pressure Liquid Leakage Test, Sub-atmospheric Pressure Air Leakage Test, Resistance to Separation Test, Stress Cracking Test, Hub Strength Test.
- Results: All samples passed acceptance criteria, confirming compliance with ISO 80369-7:2016, ISO 594-1:1986, and ISO 7864:2016, supporting substantial equivalence.
- Electrical Testing:
- Test Method Summary: Performed High Frequency Leakage Current Test, High Frequency Dielectric Strength Test, Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test.
- Results: All samples passed acceptance criteria, confirming compliance with IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012 and IEC 60601-2-2:2009, supporting substantial equivalence.
Biocompatibility
- Test Method Summary: Demonstrated through biological testing per ISO 10993-1 and FDA guidance.
- Results: Confirmed compliance with ISO 10993-1 requirements and supported substantial equivalence.
Packaging
- Test Method Summary: Ship testing performed to ensure integrity through shipping and handling. Seal strength and sterile barrier integrity validated per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 and 11607-2 over shelf life.
- Results: Met relevant requirements, confirming compliance with ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 and 11607-2, supporting substantial equivalence.
Polaris Cooled RF Probe Kit
- Mechanical Testing (Polaris Cooled RF Probe):
- Test Method Summary: Performed Leak/Pressure Test, Pull Test, Temperature Test, Tip Compression Test, Mechanical Test (Flexion), Continuity Test, Functional Test.
- Results: All samples passed acceptance criteria, confirming compliance with IEC 60601-2-2:2009 and supporting substantial equivalence.
- Mechanical Testing (Polaris Introducer):
- Test Method Summary: Performed Resistance to Separation from Unscrewing Test, Resistance to Separation Test.
- Results: All samples passed acceptance criteria, supporting substantial equivalence.
- Electrical Testing (Polaris Cooled RF Probe):
- Test Method Summary: Performed High Frequency Leakage Current Test - Cable, High Frequency Leakage Current Test - Shaft, High Frequency Dielectric Strength Test – Cable, High Frequency Dielectric Strength Test - Handle/Shaft, Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test – Cable, Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test - Handle/Shaft, Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test Connector.
- Results: All samples passed acceptance criteria, confirming compliance with IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012 and IEC 60601-2-2:2009, supporting substantial equivalence.
Biocompatibility
- Test Method Summary: Demonstrated through biological testing and comparisons to similar legally marketed devices per ISO 10993-1 and FDA guidance.
- Results: Confirmed compliance with ISO 10993-1 requirements and supported substantial equivalence.
Packaging
- Test Method Summary: Ship testing performed to ensure integrity through shipping and handling. Seal strength and sterile barrier integrity validated per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 and 11607-2 over shelf life.
- Results: Met relevant requirements, confirming compliance with ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 and 11607-2, supporting substantial equivalence.
Polaris Radiofrequency Generator
- Verification:
- Test Method Summary: Tested function, including electrical testing of RF board, User Interface Board, and Multiplexer board.
- Results: Met all relevant requirements, supporting substantial equivalence.
Packaging
- Test Method Summary: Ship testing performed to ensure integrity through shipping and handling.
- Results: All packaging met relevant requirements, supporting substantial equivalence.
Polaris Pump Unit
- Verification:
- Test Method Summary: Tested specified design requirements, including hardware. Performance assessed for inspection, configuration and Installation, operation, environment, and service life.
- Results: Met all relevant requirements, supporting substantial equivalence.
Packaging
- Test Method Summary: Ship testing performed to ensure integrity through shipping and handling.
- Results: All packaging met relevant requirements, supporting substantial equivalence.
Polaris Connector Hub
- Verification:
- Test Method Summary: Tested specified design requirements, including hardware. Performance assessed through Cable Pull Test, Cable Impulse Test, Device Identification.
- Results: Met all relevant requirements, confirmed compliance with Baylis self-enforced requirements and supported substantial equivalence.
Packaging
- Test Method Summary: Ship testing performed to ensure integrity through shipping and handling.
- Results: All packaging met relevant requirements, confirmed compliance of device packaging with Baylis self-enforced requirements and supported substantial equivalence.
Polaris Footswitch
- Packaging:
- Test Method Summary: Ship testing performed to ensure integrity through shipping and handling.
- Results: All packaging met relevant requirements, supporting substantial equivalence.
Polaris RF Ablation System
- Electrical Product Safety:
- Test Method Summary: Tested Polaris RF Generator with accessories and detachable parts for compliance with IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012 (including ANSI AAMI ES 60601-1:2005(R) 2012 + A1:2012) and IEC 60601-2-2:2009.
- Results: Met all relevant requirements, confirming compliance and supporting substantial equivalence.
- Electromagnetic Compatibility:
- Test Method Summary: Tested Polaris RF Generator with system components for compliance with IEC 60601-1-2:2014.
- Results: Met all relevant requirements, confirming compliance and supporting substantial equivalence.
- Benchtop Lesion Validation:
- Test Method Summary: Comparative lesion validation testing in a soft tissue model to demonstrate ablation performance. Performed for single and multi-probe scenarios.
- Results: Met all relevant requirements, supporting substantial equivalence.
- Usability:
- Test Method Summary: Verified and validated usability requirements. Included normal use cases, foreseeable worst-case use scenario, and testable requirements for primary operating functions.
- Results: Met all relevant requirements, supporting substantial equivalence.
- Software:
- Test Method Summary: Software verification and validation completed. FDA's guidance for software in medical devices used to determine Level of Concern.
- Results: Met all relevant requirements, supporting substantial equivalence.
All test requirements were met as specified by applicable standards and the test protocols. Results demonstrate that the Polaris RF Ablation System functions as intended and is as safe and effective as the predicate device.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
K072478, K062937, K053082, K002389, K972846
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 882.4400 Radiofrequency lesion generator.
(a)
Identification. A radiofrequency lesion generator is a device used to produce lesions in the nervous system or other tissue by the direct application of radiofrequency currents to selected sites.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Baylis Medical Company Inc. May Tsai Team Leader, Regulatory Affairs 2775 Matheson Blvd. East Mississauga, L4W 4P7 Canada
January 2, 2019
Re: K181864
Trade/Device Name: Polaris RF Ablation System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4400 Regulation Name: Radiofrequency Lesion Generator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GXD, GXI Dated: November 30, 2018 Received: December 3, 2018
Dear May Tsai:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
1
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice
(https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
$$\textbf{John Marker-S}_{\textbf{Date:2019.01.02}\textbf{16:14:56}}^{\textbf{Digitalby signed by John}}$$
For Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181864
Device Name Polaris RF Ablation System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Polaris RF Ablation System is intended for the creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
7. 510(k) Summary
7.1 Submitter Information
- A. Company Name: Baylis Medical Company Inc.
- B. Company Address: 2775 Matheson Blvd. East Mississauga, Ontario L4W 4P7 Canada
- C. Company Phone: (905) 602-4875
- D. Company Facsimile: (905) 602-5671
- E. Contact Person: May Tsai, Requlatory & Scientific Affairs Team Leader
- F. Summary Prepared on: 11-Jul-2018
7.2 Device Identification
- A. Device Trade Name:
- . Polaris RF Ablation System
- B. Device Common Name:
- Radiofrequency lesion generator ●
- . Radiofrequency lesion probe
- C. Classification Name:
- CFR 882.4400 Radiofrequency lesion generator ●
- CFR 882.4725 Radiofrequency lesion probe .
- D. Product Code:
- . GXD, GXI
- E. Device Class: Class II
4
7.3 Identification of Predicate Device
Table 7.1: Predicate Devices
Predicate Device | Manufacturer | 510(k) |
---|---|---|
Baylis Pain Management Generator-TD | K072478 | |
Baylis TransDiscal System | K062937 | |
Baylis Pain Management Cooled Probe | Halyard Health* | K053082 |
Baylis Pain Management Probe and | ||
Connector Cable | K002389 | |
BMC RF Cannula | K972846 |
*Note: Originally submitted by Baylis Medical Company Inc. as the manufacturer, but product line has since been acquired by Halyard Health.
7.4 Indications for Use
The Polaris RF Ablation System is intended for the creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue.
7.5 Device Description
The Polaris RF Ablation System includes the following components:
-
- Polaris Radiofrequency Generator and Desk Stand
-
- Polaris Pump, Pump Cable and Desk Stand
-
- Polaris Standard Connector Hub / Polaris Cooled Connector Hub
-
- Polaris Footswitch
-
- Polaris Cooled RF Probe Kit:
- i. Polaris Cooled RF Ablation Probe
- ii. Polaris Tube Kit
- iii. Polaris Introducer
-
- Polaris Single-Use RF Probe
-
- Polaris Reusable RF Probe
-
- Polaris RF Cannula
The Polaris RF Ablation System is intended for the creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue. The system is designed to deliver controlled RF energy from the Polaris RF Generator to target tissues via the Polaris RF Probes for standard RF procedures or Polaris Cooled RF Probes for cooled RF
5
procedures. RF energy is applied based on the configured RF generator settings to create the desired lesions in the target tissue. The generator also delivers low frequency stimulation pulses during procedures.
During standard RF procedures, the Polaris RF Probe is used with a compatible Polaris RF Cannula to enable RF energy delivery via the active electrode to the target tissues. During cooled RF procedures with Polaris Cooled RF Probes, the system integrates a cooling mechanism by internally circulating water through the probes using the Polaris Pump Unit. This cooling results in minimal charring of the surrounding tissue and also prevents tissue from adhering to the electrodes. This allows for larger and more consistent ablation volumes to be achieved.
7.6 Comparison to Predicate Device
The intended use of the subject Polaris RF Ablation System is the same as the predicate devices. The indication for use of the Polaris RF Ablation System is the same, or a subset of, the indications for use of the predicate devices. The subject and predicate devices share the same fundamental scientific technology, including principles of operation and mechanism of action (Tables 7.2 and 7.3). Differences in design and technological characteristics between the proposed and predicate devices do not raise any new types of safety and effectiveness questions. Verification and validation test results provide reasonable assurance of the substantial equivalence of the Polaris RF Ablation System compared to the predicate system.
6
Table 7.2: Comparison of Subject and Predicate Devices – Overall System
| | PREDICATE DEVICES | | | | | SUBJECT
DEVICE | Identical /
Substantially
Equivalent
(SE) |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| Device Name | Baylis Pain
Management
Generator-TD | TransDiscal (TD)
System | BMC RF
Cannula | BMC PM Probe
and Connector
Cable | Baylis PM
Cooled Probe | Polaris RF
Ablation System | N/A |
| 510(k) # | K072478 | K062937 | K972846 | K002389 | K053082 | K181864 | N/A |
| Manufacturer | Halyard Health* | | | | | Baylis Medical
Company Inc. | N/A |
| Class | II | II | II | II | II | II | YES/YES |
| Product Code,
Regulation | GEI, 882.4400
GXD, 882.4400 | GXI, 882.4725 | GXI, 882.4725 | GXI, 882.4725 | GXI, 882.4725 | GXD, 882.4400
GXI, 882.4725 | YES/YES |
| Indications for
Use | Baylis Pain
Management
Generator - TD;
Model PMG-115-
TD (For
Domestic Use)
and Model PMG-
230-TD (For
International
Use) is indicated
for use to create
lesions during
neurological
lesion
procedures, and
for the
coagulation and
decompression
of disc material
to treat
symptomatic
patients with | The Baylis TD
system, used in
combination with
the Baylis PM
Generator, is
indicated for the
creation of RF
heat lesions in
nervous tissue
including that
which is situated
in the
intervertebral
disc material. | The BMC RF
Cannula is
intended for
use in RF heat
lesion
procedures for
relief of pain | To create RF
lesions in
nervous tissue. | The Baylis PM
Cooled Probe
will be used in
conjunction
with a RF
Generator to
create RF
lesions in
nervous tissue. | The Polaris RF
Ablation System
is intended for
the creation of
RF lesions in
nervous tissue. | NO/YES |
| | PREDICATE DEVICES | | | | SUBJECT
DEVICE | Identical /
Substantially
Equivalent
(SE) | |
| | contained
herniated discs.
The Baylis PMG-
TD is to be used
with separately
approved probes
such as Baylis
TransDiscal
Probe, Oratec
Spinecath and
Baylis Pain
Management
Probes. | | | | | | |
| Relevant
System
Components | RF Generator | Peristaltic Pump,
Connector Cable
Tube Kit
Introducer
Y-Connecting
Cable | RF Cannula | Standard RF
Probes (non-
cooled) | Cooled RF
Probe | RF Generator
and Desk Stand
Peristaltic Pump
and Desk Stand,
Pump Connector
Cable
Connector Hub
RF Cannula
Standard RF
Probes (non-
cooled)
Cooled RF Probe
kit (Cooled RF
Probe, Tube Kit,
Introducer) | NO/YES |
Traditional 510(k)
7
8
| | PREDICATE DEVICES | SUBJECT
DEVICE | Identical /
Substantially
Equivalent
(SE) |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| User | Physicians familiar with RF lesion techniques | Physicians
familiar with RF
lesion
techniques | YES/YES |
| Anatomical
Site of Use | Nervous tissue | Nervous tissue | YES/YES |
| Access Method | Percutaneous | Percutaneous | YES/YES |
| Energy
Type | Radiofrequency | Radiofrequency | YES/YES |
| Principle of
Operation | Operator controlled; RF delivered from RF generator to compatible RF probes | Operator
controlled; RF
delivered from
RF generator to
compatible RF
probes | YES/YES |
| Mechanism of
Action | Cellular necrosis through thermal coagulation | Cellular necrosis
through thermal
coagulation | YES/YES |
| System
Feedback
Mechanism | Temperature controlled | Temperature
controlled | YES/YES |
| Ability to Make
Multiple
Lesions | Yes | Yes | YES/YES |
| | PREDICATE DEVICE | SUBJECT DEVICE | Identical/
SE |
| | RF GENERATOR | | |
| Device Name | Baylis Pain Management
Generator-TD | Polaris Radiofrequency
Generator | N/A |
| 510(k) # | K072478 | K181864 | N/A |
| Available Generator Modes | Standard RF Mode
• Stimulation
(Sensory/Motor)
• Pulsed RF (Single
RF, Multi-RF,
Bipolar RF)
• RF lesion (Single
RF, Multi-RF,
Bipolar RF) | Standard RF Mode
• Stimulation
(Sensory/Motor)
• Pulsed RF (Single
RF, Multi-RF,
Bipolar RF)
• RF lesion (Single
RF, Multi-RF,
Bipolar RF) | YES/YES |
| | Cooled RF Mode
• Stimulation
(Sensory/Motor)
• RF lesion (Single
RF, Multi-RF,
Bipolar RF) | Cooled RF Mode
• Stimulation
(Sensory/Motor)
• RF lesion (Single
RF, Multi-RF,
Bipolar RF) | |
| Maximum Power Output | 50 Watts | 50 Watts | YES/YES |
| Operating Frequency
Waveform | 461 kHz Sinusoidal | 465 kHz Sinusoidal | NO/YES |
| Temperature Monitoring
Thermocouple (RF modes) | Yes | Yes | YES/YES |
| Display Parameters | Real time temperature,
impedance, power and
voltage (pulsed RF
mode) | Real time temperature,
impedance, power and
voltage (pulsed RF
mode) | YES/YES |
| Safety Features | • Automatic shut-off for:
o Out-of-range
impedance and
temperature
o Over power,
voltage, current | • Automatic shut-off for:
o Out-of-range
impedance and
temperature
o Over power,
voltage, current | YES/YES |
| | • Output of errors,
including:
o Fault indicator,
fault code display
and description
o Audible alarm | • Output of errors,
including :
o Alert icon, fault
code display and
description
o Audible alarm | |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes | NO/YES |
| Used with Desk Stand | No | Yes | NO/YES |
| Used with Optional
Footswitch | Yes | Yes | YES/YES |
| Environment | Supplied non-sterile;
Non-sterilisable | Supplied non-sterile;
Non-sterilisable | YES/YES |
9
Table 7.3: Comparison of Subject and Predicate Devices – Relevant Components
10
PREDICATE DEVICE | SUBJECT DEVICE | Identical/SE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COOLED RF PROBE | ||||
Device Name | PM Cooled Probe | Polaris Cooled RF | ||
Ablation Probe | N/A | |||
510(k) # | K053082 | K181864 | N/A | |
Probe Configuration | Monopolar | Monopolar | YES/YES | |
Tissue Temperature | ||||
Measurement | Includes Thermocouple for | Yes | Yes | YES/YES |
Location of Thermocouple | Exposed at probe distal | |||
tip | Embedded within probe | |||
distal tip | NO/YES | |||
Patient- | ||||
Contact | Shaft, | |||
Thermocouple | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | YES/YES | |
Materials | Insulation | Polyimide | Polyimide | |
Key Non- | Handle | Acetal | ABS | NO/YES |
patient | Cable | Silicone | Silicone | |
Contact | ||||
Materials | Tubing | Polyvinyl chloride | Polyvinyl chloride | |
Luer lock | Polycarbonate | Polycarbonate | ||
Key | ||||
Dimensions | Shaft | |||
Diameter | 18 Gauge | 18 Gauge | NO/YES | |
Active Tip | ||||
Lengths | 2, 4, 5.5, 6 mm | 4, 5.5 mm | ||
Compatible | ||||
Introducer | ||||
Lengths | 50, 75, 100, 150 mm | 50, 100, 150 mm | ||
Cable | 48" (length); | |||
3.80 mm (OD) | 48" (length); | |||
3.80 mm (OD) | ||||
Tubing | 48" (length); | |||
3.18 mm (OD) | 48" (length); | |||
3.18 mm (OD) | ||||
Environment | Provided sterile; | |||
Single use | Provided sterile; | |||
Single use | YES/YES | |||
Sterilization Method: | ||||
Sterility Assurance Level | ||||
(SAL) | Ethylene oxide; | |||
10-6 | Ethylene oxide; | |||
10-6 | YES/YES | |||
TUBE KIT | ||||
Device Name | TransDiscal Tube Kit | Polaris Tube Kit | N/A | |
510(k) # | K062937 | K181864 | N/A | |
Key non- | ||||
patient | ||||
Contact | ||||
Materials | Tubing | |||
Burette, | ||||
Female Luer | ||||
Cap, Luer | ||||
Locks | Tygon | |||
Polycarbonate | Tygon | |||
Polycarbonate | NO/YES | |||
Crimp | N/A | Stainless steel | ||
Key | Tubing Length | 140" | 140" | YES/YES |
Dimensions | Burette | |||
Capacity | 70 mL | 70 mL | ||
Environment | Provided sterile; | |||
Single use | Provided sterile; | |||
Single use | YES/YES | |||
Sterilization Method; | ||||
(SAL) | Sterility Assurance Level | Ethylene oxide; | ||
10-6 | Ethylene oxide; | |||
10-6 | YES/YES | |||
PREDICATE DEVICE | SUBJECT DEVICE | Identical/ | ||
SE | ||||
INTRODUCER | ||||
Device Name | TransDiscal Introducer | Polaris Introducer | N/A | |
510(k) # | K062937 | K181864 | N/A | |
Comprises Cannula and Stylet | Yes | Yes | YES/YES | |
Depth Markers | Yes | Yes | YES/YES | |
Patient- | ||||
contact | ||||
Materials | Shaft | |||
Introducer, Stylet | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | NO/YES | |
Insulation | Polyimide | Polyimide | ||
Hub | Unknown | Copolyester | ||
Key | ||||
Dimensions | Shaft Outer | |||
Diameter | 17 Gauge | 17 Gauge | NO/YES | |
Usable | ||||
Length(s) | 50, 75, 100, 150 mm | 50, 100, 150mm | ||
Environment | Provided sterile; | |||
Single use | Provided sterile; | |||
Single use | YES/YES | |||
Sterilization Method; | ||||
Sterility Assurance Level | ||||
(SAL) | Ethylene oxide; | |||
10-6 | Ethylene oxide; | |||
10-6 | YES/YES | |||
SINGLE-USE RF PROBE | ||||
Device Name | Pain Management Probe | Polaris Single-Use RF | ||
Probe | N/A | |||
510(k) # | K002389 | K181864 | N/A | |
Configuration | Monopolar | Monopolar | YES/YES | |
Used with Compatible | ||||
Cannula | Yes | Yes | YES/YES | |
Thermocouple for Tissue | ||||
Temperature Measurement | Yes | Yes | YES/YES | |
Patient- | ||||
contact | ||||
Materials | Shaft, Stylet | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | YES/YES |
Key | ||||
Dimensions | Shaft | |||
Diameter | 24, 28, 31 Ga | 28 Ga | NO/YES | |
Compatible | ||||
Cannula | ||||
Length(s) | 50, 54, 60, 100, 145, | |||
200 mm | 50, 100, and 150 mm | |||
Environment | Provided non-sterile; | |||
Re-sterilisable (steam) | Provided sterile; | |||
Single use | NO/YES | |||
Sterilization Method; | ||||
Sterility Assurance Level | ||||
(SAL) | N/A | Ethylene oxide; | ||
10-6 | NO/YES | |||
REUSABLE RF PROBE | ||||
Device Name | Pain Management Probe | Polaris Reusable RF | ||
Probe | N/A | |||
510(k) # | K002389 | K181864 | N/A | |
Configuration | Monopolar | Monopolar | YES/YES | |
Used with Cannula | Yes | Yes | YES/YES | |
Thermocouple for Tissue | ||||
Temperature Measurement | Yes | Yes | YES/YES | |
PREDICATE DEVICE | SUBJECT DEVICE | Identical/ | ||
SE | ||||
Patient- | ||||
contact | ||||
Materials | Shaft, Stylet | Stainless steel or nitinol | Stainless steel or nitinol | YES/YES |
Key | ||||
Dimensions | Shaft | |||
Diameter | 24, 28, 31 Ga | 28 Ga | NO/YES | |
Compatible | ||||
Cannula | ||||
Length(s) | 50, 54, 60, 100, 145, | |||
200 mm | 50, 100, and 150 mm | NO/YES | ||
Environment | Provided non-sterile; | |||
Re-sterilisable (steam) | Provided non-sterile; | |||
Re-sterilisable (steam) | YES/YES | |||
RF CANNULA | ||||
Device Name | BMC RF Cannula | Polaris RF Cannula | N/A | |
510(k) # | K972846 | K181864 | N/A | |
Patient- | ||||
contact | ||||
Materials | Shaft, Stylet | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | YES/YES |
Shaft | ||||
Insulation | Polyethylene | |||
terephthalate | Polyethylene | |||
terephthalate | YES/YES | |||
Hub | Copolyester | Copolyester | YES/YES | |
Key | ||||
Dimensions | Shaft | |||
Diameter | 16, 18, 20, 21, 22 Ga | 16, 18, 20, 22 Ga | NO/YES | |
Usable | ||||
Length | 50, 54, 60, 100, 145, | |||
200 mm | 50, 100, 150 mm | NO/YES | ||
Bare Active | ||||
Tip | 2, 4, 5, 10, 15 mm | 5, 10 mm | NO/YES | |
Tip Configurations | Straight sharp | |||
Straight blunt | ||||
Curved sharp | ||||
Curved blunt | Straight sharp | |||
Curved sharp | ||||
Curved blunt | NO/YES | |||
Environment | Provided sterile; | |||
Single use | Provided sterile; | |||
Single use | YES/YES | |||
Sterilization Method; | ||||
Sterility Assurance Level | ||||
(SAL) | Ethylene oxide; | |||
10-6 | Ethylene oxide; | |||
10-6 | YES/YES | |||
PUMP UNIT | ||||
Device Name | TransDiscal Pump Unit | Polaris Pump Unit | N/A | |
510(k) # | K062937 | K181864 | N/A | |
Number of Pump Heads | Two | Two | YES/YES | |
Pump Controlled by | ||||
Generator | Yes | Yes | YES/YES | |
Used with Tube Kit(s) | Yes | Yes | YES/YES | |
Safety Switch | Yes | Yes | YES/YES | |
Used with Desk Stand | No | Yes | NO/YES | |
Environment | Supplied non-sterile; | |||
Non-sterilisable | Supplied non-sterile; | |||
Non-sterilisable | YES/YES | |||
CONNECTOR HUB | ||||
Device Name | TransDiscal Y- | |||
Connecting Cable | Polaris Connector Hub | N/A | ||
510(k) # | K062937 | K181864 | N/A | |
Number of Probe | ||||
Connections Possible | Two | Four | NO/YES | |
PREDICATE DEVICE | SUBJECT DEVICE | Identical/ | ||
SE | ||||
Connector | Probe | 5-pin female | 7-pin female | NO/YES |
Generator | 19-pin male | 33-pin HG4 male | NO/YES | |
Key Cable Materials | Silicone, Thermoplastic elastomer | Thermoplastic elastomer, injection molded plastic | NO/YES | |
Cable Length | 9 feet | 8 feet | NO/YES | |
Environment | Supplied non-sterile; Non-sterilisable | Supplied non-sterile; Non-sterilisable | YES/YES |
11
12
13
7.7 Performance Testing
Performance testing was completed to demonstrate substantial equivalence of the Polaris RF Ablation System and relevant system components to the identified predicate devices in Table 7.1. The system components were subjected to the verification and validation testing listed in Table 7.4.
Table 7.4: Performance Testing of Subject Device
Tests | Test Method Summary | Results | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mechanical | Polaris Re-Usable RF Probe | |||
Mechanical | The following tests were conducted | |||
to verify whether the subject device | ||||
was capable of withstanding the | ||||
relevant mechanical stresses without | ||||
failure: | ||||
• Temperature Test | ||||
• Pull Test | ||||
• Cleaning and Sterilization | ||||
Reuse Test | ||||
• Mechanical Reuse Test | ||||
• Mechanical Test (Flexion) | ||||
• Continuity Test | ||||
• Functional Test | All samples passed the | |||
acceptance criteria. Results | ||||
confirmed compliance of the | ||||
device with IEC 60601-2- | ||||
2:2009 and support | ||||
substantial equivalence with | ||||
the predicate device. | ||||
Electrical | Electrical verification was conducted | |||
through comparison with the Polaris | ||||
Standard Single-Use Probe to verify | ||||
whether the device was capable of | ||||
withstanding the relevant electrical | ||||
stresses without failure. | The device was verified to | |||
meet the requirements of IEC | ||||
60601-1:2005+A1:2012 and | ||||
IEC 60601-2-2:2009. Results | ||||
support substantial | ||||
equivalence with the predicate | ||||
device. |
14
Tests | Test Method Summary | Results |
---|---|---|
Biocompatibility | Biocompatibility of the subject device | |
was demonstrated through | ||
comparisons to similar legally | ||
marketed devices as per current ISO | ||
10993-1 requirements and the FDA | ||
guidance, "Use of International | ||
Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological | ||
evaluation of medical devices - Part | ||
1: Evaluation and testing within a | ||
risk management process". | Results confirmed compliance | |
of the device with the current | ||
ISO 10993-1 requirements | ||
and support substantial | ||
equivalence with the predicate | ||
device. | ||
Packaging | Ship testing was performed to ensure | |
the integrity of the subject device | ||
packaging through the rigors of | ||
shipping and handling. | All packaging met relevant | |
requirements. Results support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Cleaning and Sterilization | The recommended reprocessing | |
methods provided in the Instructions | ||
for use were validated to ensure the | ||
recommended parameters and | ||
method could achieve a Sterility | ||
Assurance Level of 10-6. | The device was verified to | |
meet the requirements of | ||
AAMI TIR12, AAMI TIR30 and | ||
ANSI/AAMI ST81 | ||
requirements and the FDA | ||
guidance, "Reprocessing | ||
Medical Devices in Health Care | ||
Settings: Validation Methods | ||
and Labeling". Results support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Mechanical | Polaris Single-Use RF Probe | |
The following tests were conducted | ||
to verify whether the subject device | ||
was capable of withstanding the | ||
relevant mechanical stresses without | ||
failure: | ||
● Temperature Test | ||
● Pull Test | ||
● Durability Test | ||
● Mechanical Test (Flexion) | ||
● Continuity Test | ||
● Functional Test | All samples passed the | |
acceptance criteria. Results | ||
confirmed compliance of the | ||
device with IEC 60601-2- | ||
2:2009 and support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Tests | Test Method Summary | Results |
Electrical | The following tests were conducted | |
to verify whether the subject device | ||
was capable of withstanding the | ||
relevant electrical stresses without | ||
failure: | ||
High Frequency Leakage | ||
Current Test - Cable High Frequency Dielectric | ||
Strength Test – Cable High Frequency Dielectric | ||
Strength Test - Handle Mains Frequency Dielectric | ||
Strength Test - Cable Mains Frequency Dielectric | ||
Strength Test - Handle Mains Frequency Dielectric | ||
Strength Test – Connector | All samples passed the | |
acceptance criteria. Results | ||
confirmed compliance of the | ||
device with IEC 60601- | ||
1:2005+A1:2012 and IEC | ||
60601-2-2:2009 and support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Biocompatibility | Biocompatibility of the subject device | |
was demonstrated through | ||
comparisons to similar legally | ||
marketed devices as per current ISO | ||
10993-1 requirements and the FDA | ||
guidance, "Use of International | ||
Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological | ||
evaluation of medical devices - Part | ||
1: Evaluation and testing within a | ||
risk management process". | Results confirmed compliance | |
of the device with the current | ||
ISO 10993-1 requirements | ||
and support substantial | ||
equivalence with the predicate | ||
device. | ||
Packaging | Ship testing was performed to ensure | |
the integrity of the subject device | ||
packaging through the rigors of | ||
shipping and handling. The seal | ||
strength and sterile barrier integrity | ||
was validated per ANSI/AAMI/ISO | ||
11607-1 and 11607-2 over the shelf | ||
life of the device. | The device packaging met | |
relevant requirements. Results | ||
confirmed compliance of | ||
device packaging with | ||
ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 and | ||
11607-2 and support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Tests | Test Method Summary | Results |
Polaris RF Cannula | ||
Mechanical | The following tests were conducted | |
to verify whether the subject device | ||
was capable of withstanding the | ||
relevant mechanical stresses without | ||
failure: | ||
Positive Pressure Liquid | ||
Leakage Test Sub-atmospheric Pressure Air | ||
Leakage Test Resistance to Separation Test Stress Cracking Test Hub Strength Test | All samples passed the | |
acceptance criteria. Results | ||
confirmed the device met with | ||
the mechanical requirements | ||
of ISO 80369-7:2016, ISO | ||
594-1:1986 and ISO | ||
7864:2016 and support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Electrical | The following tests were conducted | |
to verify whether the subject device | ||
was capable of withstanding the | ||
relevant electrical stresses without | ||
failure: | ||
High Frequency Leakage | ||
Current Test High Frequency Dielectric | ||
Strength Test Mains Frequency Dielectric | ||
Strength Test | All samples passed the | |
acceptance criteria. Results | ||
confirmed compliance of the | ||
device with IEC 60601- | ||
1:2005+A1:2012 and IEC | ||
60601-2-2:2009 and support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Biocompatibility | Biocompatibility of the subject device | |
was demonstrated through biological | ||
testing as per current ISO 10993-1 | ||
requirements and the FDA guidance, | ||
"Use of International Standard ISO | ||
10993-1, "Biological evaluation of | ||
medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation | ||
and testing within a risk | ||
management process". | Results confirmed compliance | |
of the device with the current | ||
ISO 10993-1 requirements | ||
and support substantial | ||
equivalence with the predicate | ||
device. | ||
Packaging | Ship testing was performed to ensure | |
the integrity of the subject device | ||
packaging through the rigors of | ||
shipping and handling. The seal | ||
strength and sterile barrier integrity | ||
was validated per ANSI/AAMI/ISO | ||
11607-1 and 11607-2 over the shelf | ||
life of the device. | The device packaging met | |
relevant requirements. Results | ||
confirmed compliance of | ||
device packaging with | ||
ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 and | ||
11607-2 and support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Tests | Test Method Summary | Results |
Polaris Cooled RF Probe Kit | ||
Mechanical | The following tests were conducted to verify whether the Polaris Cooled RF Probe was capable of withstanding the relevant mechanical stresses without failure: | |
Leak/Pressure Test Pull Test Temperature Test Tip Compression Test Mechanical Test (Flexion) Continuity Test Functional Test | All samples passed the acceptance criteria. Results confirmed compliance of the device with IEC 60601-2-2:2009 and support substantial equivalence with the predicate device. | |
The following tests were conducted to verify whether the Polaris Introducer was capable of withstanding the relevant mechanical stresses without failure: | ||
Resistance to Separation from Unscrewing Test Resistance to Separation Test | All samples passed the acceptance criteria. Results support substantial equivalence with the predicate device. | |
Electrical | The following tests were conducted to verify whether the Polaris Cooled RF Probe was capable of withstanding the relevant electrical stresses without failure: | |
High Frequency Leakage Current Test - Cable High Frequency Leakage Current Test - Shaft High Frequency Dielectric Strength Test – Cable High Frequency Dielectric Strength Test - Handle/Shaft Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test – Cable Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test - Handle/Shaft Mains Frequency Dielectric Strength Test Connector | All samples passed the acceptance criteria. Results confirmed compliance of the device with IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012 and IEC 60601-2-2:2009 and support substantial equivalence with the predicate device. | |
Tests | Test Method Summary | Results |
Biocompatibility | Biocompatibility of the Polaris Cooled | |
RF Probe and Polaris Introducer was | ||
demonstrated through biological | ||
testing and comparisons to similar | ||
legally marketed devices as per | ||
current ISO 10993-1 requirements | ||
and the FDA guidance, "Use of | ||
International Standard ISO 10993-1, | ||
"Biological evaluation of medical | ||
devices - Part 1: Evaluation and | ||
testing within a risk management | ||
process". | Results confirmed compliance | |
of the devices with the current | ||
ISO 10993-1 requirements | ||
and support substantial | ||
equivalence with the predicate | ||
devices. | ||
Packaging | Ship testing was performed to ensure | |
the integrity of the subject device | ||
packaging through the rigors of | ||
shipping and handling. The seal | ||
strength and sterile barrier integrity | ||
was validated per ANSI/AAMI/ISO | ||
11607-1 and 11607-2 over the shelf | ||
life of the device. | The subject device packaging | |
met relevant requirements. | ||
Results confirmed compliance | ||
of device packaging with | ||
ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 and | ||
11607-2 and support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Verification | Polaris Radiofrequency Generator | |
Testing was conducted to verify the | ||
function of the subject device, | ||
including electrical testing of the | ||
following hardware components: | ||
• RF board | ||
• User Interface Board | ||
• Multiplexer board | The subject device met all | |
relevant requirements. Results | ||
support substantial | ||
equivalence with the predicate | ||
device. | ||
Packaging | Ship testing was performed to ensure | |
the integrity of the subject device | ||
packaging through the rigors of | ||
shipping and handling. | All packaging met relevant | |
requirements. Results support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Tests | Test Method Summary | Results |
Polaris Pump Unit | ||
Verification | Testing was conducted to verify specified design requirements of the subject device, including hardware. Performance was assessed in test cases covering the following aspects: | |
● Inspection | ||
● Configuration and Installation | ||
● Operation | ||
● Environment and Service Life | The subject device met all relevant requirements. Results support substantial equivalence with the predicate device. | |
Packaging | Ship testing was performed to ensure the integrity of the subject device packaging through the rigors of shipping and handling. | All packaging met relevant requirements. Results support substantial equivalence with the predicate device. |
Polaris Connector Hub | ||
Verification | Testing was conducted to verify specified design requirements of the subject device, including hardware. Performance was assessed through various test cases, including: | |
● Cable Pull Test | ||
● Cable Impulse Test | ||
● Device Identification | The subject device met all relevant requirements. Results confirmed compliance of the device with Baylis self-enforced requirements and support substantial equivalence with the predicate device. | |
Packaging | Ship testing was performed to ensure the integrity of the device packaging through the rigors of shipping and handling. | All packaging met relevant requirements. Results confirmed compliance of device packaging with Baylis self-enforced requirements and support substantial equivalence with the predicate device. |
Polaris Footswitch | ||
Packaging | Ship testing was performed to ensure the integrity of the subject device packaging through the rigors of shipping and handling. | All packaging met relevant requirements. Results support substantial equivalence with the predicate device. |
Tests | Test Method Summary | Results |
Polaris RF Ablation System | ||
Electrical Product | ||
Safety | The Polaris RF Generator, together | |
with relevant accessories and | ||
detachable parts, was tested to | ||
demonstrate compliance with the | ||
applicable requirements of IEC | ||
60601-1:2005+A1:2012 (including | ||
national deviations as per ANSI AAMI | ||
ES 60601-1:2005(R) 2012 + | ||
A1:2012) and IEC 60601-2-2: 2009. | The subject device met all | |
relevant requirements. Results | ||
confirmed compliance of the | ||
device with | ||
IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012 | ||
and IEC 60601-2-2:2009 and | ||
support substantial | ||
equivalence with the predicate | ||
device. | ||
Electromagnetic | ||
Compatibility | The Polaris RF Generator, together | |
with applicable system components, | ||
was tested to demonstrate | ||
compliance with the applicable | ||
requirements of IEC 60601-1- | ||
2:2014. | The subject device met all | |
relevant requirements. Results | ||
confirmed compliance of the | ||
device with | ||
IEC 60601-1-2:2014 and | ||
support substantial | ||
equivalence with the predicate | ||
device. | ||
Benchtop Lesion | ||
Validation | Comparative lesion validation testing | |
was performed using a soft tissue | ||
model to demonstrate the | ||
substantially equivalent ablation | ||
performance of the subject and | ||
predicate systems. Testing was | ||
performed for both single and multi- | ||
probe scenarios. | The subject device met all | |
relevant requirements. Results | ||
support substantial | ||
equivalence with the predicate | ||
device. | ||
Usability | Testing was performed to verify and | |
validate the usability requirements of | ||
the subject Polaris RF Ablation | ||
System. Elements captured included | ||
normal use cases, a foreseeable | ||
worst-case use scenario, and | ||
testable requirements for primary | ||
operating functions. | The device met all relevant | |
requirements. Results support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. | ||
Tests | Test Method Summary | Results |
Software | Software verification and validation | |
was completed for the subject | ||
device. FDA's current "Guidance for | ||
the Content of Premarket | ||
Submissions for Software Contained | ||
in Medical Devices" was used to | ||
determine the Level of Concern for | ||
the software in the subject Polaris RF | ||
Ablation System. | The device met all relevant | |
requirements. Results support | ||
substantial equivalence with | ||
the predicate device. |
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
All test requirements were met as specified by applicable standards and the test protocols. Results demonstrate that the Polaris RF Ablation System functions as intended and is as safe and effective as the predicate device.
7.8 Conclusions
The intended use of the subject Polaris RF Ablation System is the same as the predicate devices. The indications for use of the Polaris RF Ablation System is the same, or a subset of, the indications for use of the predicate devices. The fundamental scientific technology of the Polaris RF Ablation System, including principles of operation and mechanism of action, is the same as the predicate devices. Differences in design and technological characteristics between the subject and predicate devices do not raise any new types of questions of safety and effectiveness. Verification and validation test results support the substantial equivalence of the Polaris RF Ablation System to the predicate system.