Not Found
No
The summary does not mention AI or ML, and the device description and performance studies focus on standard bone densitometry techniques and comparisons to predicate devices.
No
The device is used for diagnostic purposes (estimating bone mineral density, assessing fracture risk) and does not directly provide therapy or treatment.
Yes
Explanation: The device is described as an "X-ray Bone Densitometer designed to estimate the bone mineral density of patients" and provides "an assessment of relative risk" and "10-year fracture risk," all of which are diagnostic functions. It also generates reports to "assist the physician in communicating scan results."
No
The device description explicitly states that the Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer is composed of a scanner and a computer that runs the software. The scanner includes hardware components like the x-ray source, detector, patient scan table, and mechanical drive system. Therefore, it is not a software-only device.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In vitro diagnostics are tests performed on samples taken from the human body, such as blood, urine, or tissue, to detect diseases, conditions, or infections. They are used to examine specimens outside of the body.
- Device Function: The Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer uses X-rays to estimate bone mineral density within the patient's body. It is a medical imaging device that performs a diagnostic procedure directly on the patient.
- Intended Use: The intended use describes estimating bone mineral density of patients when medically indicated by their physicians. This is a diagnostic assessment performed on the living patient.
- Device Description: The description details a scanner with an x-ray source and detector, a patient scan table, and a computer for data acquisition and analysis. This is consistent with an in-vivo imaging system, not an in-vitro testing device.
Therefore, the Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer is a medical device used for in-vivo diagnostic imaging, not an in-vitro diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
X-ray Bone Densitometer designed to estimate the bone mineral density of patients when medically indicated by their physicians.
- Provides an estimate of bone mineral density at various anatomical sites (Spine, Femur, Forearm). These values can then be compared to an adult reference population at the sole discretion of the physician.
- Provides an assessment of relative risk based on the patient's T-score value using the categories of fracture risk defined by the World Health Organization (WHO).
- Provides an assessment of 10-year fracture risk using WHO FRAX model.
- Provides a standardized bone density report using data from the densitometer and physician-generated assessments based on the patient's demographics, which can assist the physician in communicating scan results to the patient and the patient's referring physician.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
KGI
Device Description
The Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer is designed to be a value product version of the predicate device, the Prodigy (K982267 and K161682). Like its predicate Prodigy device, the proposed Aria device is composed of a scanner and a computer that runs the software. The scanner comprises the x-ray source and detector, the patient scan table, the mechanical drive system, and the lowest level portions of the control system. The scanner is in communication with the computer, which is a standard PC. The computer runs the enCORE software, and thus controls the scanner, acquires scan data from the scanner, stores and analyzes the data, and interacts with the human operator.
Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer functions with the same software as the one that is FDA cleared under GE Lunar DXA Bone Densitometers with enCORE version 17 (K161682).
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
X-ray
Anatomical Site
Spine, Femur, Forearm
Indicated Patient Age Range
adult reference population
Intended User / Care Setting
physicians
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Bench Testing: Precision and Accuracy
During product development, precision and accuracy tests are performed over a wide range of phantoms to cover the variation in human subjects. Repeat measurements on a phantom are performed to verify precision using standard statistical analysis of the data. Similarly, a set of phantoms with different BMD and tissue composition properties is measured to verify accuracy by showing an excellent correlation to previously released Prodigy product. The method used consist of verifying BMD precision and accuracy for various scan sites by measuring phantom set and calculate mean, standard deviation, %CV, and correlation to expected values to ensure clinical performance requirements are met. The acceptance criteria used are as follows for all sites (AP Spine BMD, Femur BMD and Forearm BMD): Precision 0.95. The results of the bench testing provided in the submission demonstrate that Aria can accurately and precisely estimate bone density.
Design verification and validation testing was performed to confirm that the safety and effectiveness of the device has not been affected. The test plans and results have been executed with acceptable results.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Precision 0.95
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 892.1170 Bone densitometer.
(a)
Identification. A bone densitometer is a device intended for medical purposes to measure bone density and mineral content by x-ray or gamma ray transmission measurements through the bone and adjacent tissues. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
GE Medical Systems Ultrasound & Primary Care Diagnostics, LLC % Nicole Landreville, Eng, RAC, FRAPS Regulatory Affairs Manager 3030 Ohmeda Drive MADISON WI 53718
Re: K180782
Trade/Device Name: Aria Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1170 Regulation Name: Bone Densitometer Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KGI Dated: March 21, 2018 Received: March 26, 2018
Dear Ms. Landreville:
We have reviewed vour Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
April 20, 2018
1
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone
(1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Michael D. O'Hara For
Robert Ochs. Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K180782
Device Name Aria
Indications for Use (Describe)
X-ray Bone Densitometer designed to estimate the bone mineral density of patients when medically indicated by their physicians.
- · Provides an estimate of bone mineral density at various anatomical sites (Spine, Femur, Forearm). These values can then be compared to an adult reference population at the sole discretion of the physician.
- Provides an assessment of relative risk based on the patient's T-score value using the categories of fracture risk defined by the World Health Organization (WHO).
- · Provides an assessment of 10-year fracture risk using WHO FRAX model.
- Provides a standardized bone density report using data from the densitometer and physician-generated assessments
based on the patient's demographics, which can assist the physician in communicating scan results to the patient and the patient's referring physician.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- |
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for General Electric (GE). The logo is a blue circle with the letters "GE" in a stylized font in the center. The circle is surrounded by a decorative border of swirling lines. The logo is simple and recognizable, and it is often used to represent the company's brand.
Section 5: 510(k) Summary
Aria
4
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'g' and 'e' intertwined in a stylized script, enclosed within a circular frame. The color of the logo is a light blue.
510(k) Summary
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92 the following summary of information is provided:
| Date Submitted: | 21-Mar-2018 |
|---|---|
| Submitter: | GE Healthcare |
| GE Medical Systems Ultrasound & Primary Care Diagnostics, LLC. | |
| 3030 Ohmeda Drive | |
| Madison, WI, USA 53707 | |
| Primary Contact | |
| Person: | Nicole Landreville, Eng, RAC, FRAPS |
| Regulatory Affairs Manager | |
| GE Healthcare | |
| GE Medical Systems Ultrasound & Primary Care Diagnostics, LLC. | |
| Telephone: (289) 208-2365 | |
| Email: Nicole.landreville@ge.com | |
| Secondary Contact | |
| Person: | Diane Uriell |
| Regulatory Affairs Director | |
| GE Healthcare | |
| Telephone: (262) 290-8212 | |
| Email: Diane.Uriell@ge.com | |
| Device Trade Name: | Aria |
| Common/Usual | |
| Name: | X-Ray Bone Densitometer |
| Classification Names: | |
| Product Code: | Regulation Name: Bone Densitometer |
| Regulation: 21 CFR 892.1170 | |
| Classification: Class II | |
| Product Codes: KGI | |
| Predicate Device: | Prodigy (K982267 and K161682) |
| Regulation Name: | Bone Densitometer |
| Regulation: | 21 CFR 892.1170 |
| Classification: | Class II |
| Product Codes: | KGI |
| Device Description: | The Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer is designed to be a value product version of the predicate device, the Prodigy (K982267 and K161682). Like its predicate Prodigy device, the proposed Aria device is composed of a scanner and a computer that runs the software. The scanner comprises the x-ray source and detector, the patient scan table, the mechanical drive system, and the lowest level portions of the control system. The scanner is in communication with the computer, which is a standard PC. The computer runs the enCORE software, and thus controls the scanner, acquires scan data from the scanner, stores and analyzes the data, and interacts with the human operator. |
Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer functions with the same software as the one that is FDA cleared under GE Lunar DXA Bone Densitometers with enCORE version 17 (K161682). |
| Intended Use: | The bone densitometer is designed to estimate the bone mineral density of patients when medically indicated by their physicians. |
| Indications for Use: | X-ray Bone Densitometer designed to estimate the bone mineral density of patients when medically indicated by their physicians.
Provides an estimate of bone mineral density at various anatomical sites (Spine, Femur, Forearm). These values can then be compared to an adult reference population at the sole discretion of the physician. Provides an assessment of relative fracture risk based on the patient's T-score value using the categories of fracture risk defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Provides an assessment of 10-year fracture risk using WHO FRAX model. Provides a standardized bone density report using data from the densitometer and physician-generated assessments based on the patient's demographics, which can assist the physician in communicating scan results to the patient and the patient's referring physician. |
| Technology: | Aria employs the same fundamental scientific technology, the
same mechanism of action and working principle as the predicate
device Prodigy (K982267). |
| | The proposed device and the predicate device have the same
structural composition with minor differences. They are both
composed of 3 main components:
- Scanner:
a. Scanner Table: The proposed device and the
predicate device share a similar design
architecture and similar manufacturing processes.
The scanners differ slightly in physical sizes (when
comparing the Prodigy compact with Aria
scanner). Both support the same maximum patient
weight.
b. Detector: Identical sensor type with different
number of elements.
c. X-Ray generator: Identical tube voltage and K-
edge filter with different max current output. - Computer: The same computer model is used for Aria and
its predicate device. - Software : The proposed device and the predicate device
are controlled by the same enCORE software (K161682).
Some high-end features are not activated when installed
on an Aria system (ex.: features related with body
composition and metabolic health).
Aria's intended use is a sub-set of Prodigy's intended use in that it
provides an estimate of the bone mineral density. |
| | Aria's indications for use are a sub-set of the predicate Prodigy
device indications for use. |
| | The additional IFUs on Prodigy relate with metabolic health and
advanced BMD features do not apply to the proposed device. |
| | These differences do not significantly affect safety and/or
effectiveness. |
| Determination of
Substantial
Equivalence: | Summary of Non-Clinical Tests: |
| | The Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer and its applications comply with
voluntary standards. |
| | • ES60601-1 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General
requirements for basic safety and essential performance;
• IEC 60601-1-2 Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-2: General
Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance –
Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility -
Requirements and Tests. |
5
GE Healthcare
510(k) Premarket Notification Submission Aria
Image /page/5/Picture/2 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' in a stylized, cursive font, enclosed within a circular border. The color of the logo is blue, and the background is white.
6
Image /page/6/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for General Electric (GE). The logo is a blue circle with the letters "GE" in a stylized font in the center. There are decorative swirls around the letters and the edge of the circle. The logo is simple and recognizable.
7
510(k) Premarket Notification Submission Aria
Image /page/7/Picture/2 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' intertwined in a stylized script, enclosed within a circular frame. The color of the logo is blue, and the background is white.
IEC 60601-2-28 Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 2-28: ● Determination of Particular Requirements For The Basic Safety And Essential Substantial Performance Of X-Ray Tube Assemblies For Medical Diagnosis; Equivalence: (Cont.) IEC 60601-1-3 Medical Elec. Equipment – Part 1-3: General . Requirements for Safety. Collateral Standard: General Requirements for Radiation Protection in Diagnostic X-Ray Equipment: IEC 60601-1-8 Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-8: General . Requirements For Basic Safety And Essential Performance -Collateral Standard: General Requirements. Tests And Guidance For Alarm Systems In Medical Electrical Equipment And Medical Electrical Systems; IEC 60601-1-6 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-6: General ● requirements for safety - Collateral Standard: Usability; IEC 62366 Medical devices - Application of usability . engineering to medical Devices; AAMI / ANSI / ISO 10993-1 Biological Evaluation Of Medical . Devices - Part 1: Evaluation And Testing Within A Risk Management Process; AAMI / ANSI / ISO 10993-5 Biological Evaluation Of Medical ● Devices - Part 5: Tests For In Vitro Cytotoxicity: AAMI / ANSI / IEC 62304 Medical Device Software - Software ● Life Cvcle Processes: ISO 14971 - Medical Devices - Application Of Risk Management ● To Medical Devices; ISO 15223-1 Medical Devices - Symbols To Be Used With ● Medical Device Labels, Labelling, And Information To Be Supplied - Part 1: General Requirements; ● PS 3.1 - 3.20 Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) set. (Radiology); The following quality assurance measures were applied to the development of the system: ■ Risk Analysis ■ Requirements Reviews I Design Reviews ■ Testing on unit level (Module verification) ■ Integration testing . Performance testing (Verification) ■ Safety testing (Verification) 트 Simulated use testing (Validation)
8
510(k) Premarket Notification Submission Aria
Image /page/8/Picture/2 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' intertwined in a stylized script, enclosed within a circular frame. The logo is colored in a bright blue hue, set against a white background.
| Determination of
Substantial
Equivalence: (Cont.) | Risks were reviewed and mitigated with design controls and
labeling. The mitigations were verified and validated as a part of
the design verification and validation testing that has been
executed with acceptable results.
The testing/documentation we provided for Aria were completed
according to the following FDA guidance documents:
Usability: Applying Human Factors And Usability Engineering
To Medical Devices - Guidance For Industry And Food And Drug
Administration Staff. Document Issued On: February 3, 2016. Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for
Software Contained in Medical Devices, issued May 11, 2005. Guidance for Off-the-Shelf Software Use in Medical Devices,
September 1999. General Principles of Software Validation; Final Guidance for
Industry and FDA Staff, January 2002. Guidance for Industry - Cybersecurity for Networked Medical
Devices Containing Off-the Shelf (OTS) Software, January 2005. Guidance for Content of Premarket Submissions for
Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices, issued on
October 2, 2014. FDA Guidance on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) of
Electrically-Powered Medical Devices issued on July 11, 2016. |
|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | In addition, Aria X-Ray bone densitometer was designed to meet
the applicable federal performance standards listed within 21 CFR
Subchapter J as follows:
21 CFR 1010 - Performance Standards for Electronic Products:
General 21 CFR 1020.30 – Diagnostic X-Ray Systems and Their Major
Components 21 CFR 1040.10 - Laser Products |
| | Summary of Clinical Tests:
The proposed Aria device intended use / indications for use are a
subset of the predicate Prodigy device intended use / indications
for use.
The subject of this premarket submission, Aria, did not require
clinical studies to support substantial equivalence. |
| Determination of
Substantial
Equivalence: (Cont.) | Bench Testing: Precision and Accuracy
During product development, precision and accuracy tests are
performed over a wide range of phantoms to cover the variation in
human subjects. Repeat measurements on a phantom are
performed to verify precision using standard statistical analysis of
the data. Similarly, a set of phantoms with different BMD and
tissue composition properties is measured to verify accuracy by
showing an excellent correlation to previously released Prodigy
product. The method used consist of verifying BMD precision and
accuracy for various scan sites by measuring phantom set and
calculate mean, standard deviation, %CV, and correlation to
expected values to ensure clinical performance requirements are
met. The acceptance criteria used are as follows for all sites (AP
Spine BMD, Femur BMD and Forearm BMD):
Precision 0.95 The results of the bench testing provided in the submission
demonstrate that Aria can accurately and precisely estimate bone
density.
Design verification and validation testing was performed to
confirm that the safety and effectiveness of the device has not
been affected. The test plans and results have been executed with
acceptable results. |
| Conclusion: | The proposed Aria device intended use / indications for use are a
subset of the predicate Prodigy device intended use / indications
for use.
The differences in the hardware do not result in any new potential
safety risks.
Aria has the same technological characteristics, and performs as
well as the predicate Prodigy device currently legally marketed on
the US market.
After analyzing design verification and validation testing it is the
conclusion of GE Healthcare that Aria is as safe, as effective, and
its performance is substantially equivalent to the predicate Prodigy
device. |
9
Image /page/9/Picture/1 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' in a stylized, cursive font, enclosed within a circular shape. The circle is surrounded by a series of wave-like or swirling lines, giving the logo a dynamic and recognizable appearance. The color of the logo is a light blue.