(84 days)
Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank are indicated for the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, or for jacket crowns, facings, and veneers.
Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank are available in discs shape, and in various specifications, which are combinations of height (1025mm), color model (0M1/A1A4/B1B4/C1C4/D2~D4) and transparency model (T41/T45/T49/TR).
This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for a dental material, not a medical device involving AI or software. Therefore, the requested information about acceptance criteria, study details, and AI-specific metrics (like human reader improvement with AI assistance) is not applicable to this submission.
Here's a breakdown of why many of your questions cannot be answered from the provided text:
- No AI or Software: The device, "Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank," is a material for dental restorations. It does not involve any artificial intelligence, machine learning, or software components that would have performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or AUC, or require a ground truth established by experts.
- No Diagnostic or Interpretive Task: This device is a component used in manufacturing, not a diagnostic tool that interprets data or images.
- No Clinical Study for Performance Evaluation: The document explicitly states: "No clinical study is included in this submission." This means there is no human-in-the-loop performance evaluation or comparison against human experts.
However, I can extract information related to the performance testing that was conducted for this material:
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The "acceptance criteria" here refer to the performance standards and biocompatibility tests for the material itself, not diagnostic accuracy. The reported device performance indicates conformance to these standards.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Test/Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate) | Reported Device Performance (Subject Device) |
|---|---|---|
| Material Properties | ||
| Type and Class per | Type II Class 5 | Type II Class 5 |
| ISO 6872:2015 | ||
| Chemical Composition | ZrO2 ≥ 99.0%, Inorganic Pigment (Fe2O3, Er2O3) ≤ 1% | ZrO2 > 99.0%, Inorganic Pigment (Al2O3, SiO2, Fe2O3, Er2O3) < 1% |
| Crystal Morphology | Tetragonal | Tetragonal |
| Density | 6.00 g/cm³ | 6.00 g/cm³ |
| Sintering temperature | 1500 ± 50°C | 1500 ± 50°C |
| Performance | Comply with ISO 6872 | Comply with ISO 6872 |
| Biocompatibility | ||
| Cytotoxicity | No adverse reaction identified (Tested) | No adverse react identified (Tested per ISO 10993-5:2009) |
| Intracutaneous Reactivity | No adverse reaction identified (Tested) | No adverse react identified (Tested per ISO 10993-10:2010) |
| Sensitization | No adverse reaction identified (Tested) | No adverse react identified (Tested per ISO 10993-10:2010) |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity | No adverse reaction identified (Tested) | No adverse react identified (Tested per ISO 10993-11:2006) |
| Genotoxicity | No adverse reaction identified (Tested) | No adverse react identified (Tested per ISO 10993-3:2014) |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- This information is not provided in a way that relates to "test sets" for diagnostic performance. For the material properties and biocompatibility tests, the sample sizes and specific types of samples (e.g., number of discs tested for density) are not detailed in this summary. The data provenance is internal testing conducted by the manufacturer to demonstrate compliance with international standards.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- Not applicable. There is no "ground truth" to be established by experts in the context of diagnostic accuracy for this material. The tests are chemical, physical, and biological assessments of the material itself.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not applicable. No diagnostic adjudication method is relevant to material property and biocompatibility testing.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not applicable. This is not an AI device, and no MRMC study was performed.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable. This is not an algorithm or AI device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- Not applicable in the diagnostic sense. For material properties, the "ground truth" is established by verifiable scientific measurement against established international standards (e.g., ISO 6872 for ceramic materials, ISO 10993 for biocompatibility).
8. The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable.
In summary, the provided document is a 510(k) summary for a dental material, not an AI or software-based medical device. Therefore, most of the questions relating to AI performance metrics, expert adjudication, and ground truth establishment for diagnostic purposes are irrelevant to this specific submission. The "acceptance criteria" and "performance" discussed are related to the material's physical, chemical, and biological properties.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, featuring a stylized human figure. To the right of it is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in a larger, bolder font, and "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font below.
Crown Porcelain Dental Technology Co., Ltd. % Diana Hong General Manager Mid-Link Consulting Co.,Ltd. P.O. Box 120-119 Shanghai, 200120 Cn
April 24, 2018
Re: K180252
Trade/Device Name: Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6660 Regulation Name: Porcelain Powder For Clinical Use Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: EIH Dated: February 27, 2018 Received: March 7, 2018
Dear Diana Hong:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820);
{1}------------------------------------------------
and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Mary S. Runner -S
for Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K180252
Device Name
Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank
Indications for Use (Describe)
Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank are indicated for the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, or for jacket crowns, facings, and veneers.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Tab #7 510(k) Summary
This 510(k) Summary is being submitted in accordance with requirements of SMDA 1990 and Title 21, CFR Section 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) Number: ____
-
- Date of Preparation: 02/24/2018
-
- Sponsor Identification
Crown Porcelain Dental Technology Co., Ltd. 5F.-1, No.189, Sec.2, Keelung Rd., Xinyi Dist.,
Taipei City 110, Taiwan
Establishment Registration Number: Not yet registered for the Number
Contact Person: Chu Lien Fan Position: General Manager Tel: +886-2-2732-4911 ext.11 Fax: +886-2-2732-9209 Email: tpe0709@gmail.com
3. Designated Submission Correspondent
Ms. Diana Hong (Primary Contact Person) Ms. Betty Xiao (Alternative Contact Person)
Mid-Link Consulting Co., Ltd
P.O. Box 120-119, Shanghai, 200120, China
Tel: +86-21-22815850, Fax: 360-925-3199 Email: info@mid-link.net
{4}------------------------------------------------
4. Identification of Proposed Device
Trade Name: Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank Common Name: Zirconia Blocks
Regulatory Information
Classification Name: Powder, Porcelain Classification: 2 Product Code: EIH Regulation Number: 872.6660 Review Panel: Dental
Intended Use Statement:
Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank are indicated for the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, or for jacket crowns, facings, and veneers.
Device Description
Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank are available in discs shape, and in various specifications, which are combinations of height (1025mm), color model (0M1/A1A4/B1B4/C1C4/D2~D4) and transparency model (T41/T45/T49/TR).
-
ર. Identification of Predicate Device(s)
510(k) Number: K160367 Product Name: Nissin Dental Zirconia Blank & Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank Manufacturer: Nissin-Metec China Co., Ltd. -
Non-Clinical Test Conclusion 6.
Non clinical tests were conducted to verify that the proposed device met all design specifications as was Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate device, including -
Performance Test per ISO 6872 Fourth Edition 2015-06-01, Dentistry - Ceramic Materials.
-
Density Test
-
Cytotoxicity per ISO 10993-5:2009;
-
Intracutaneous Reactivity Test per ISO 10993-10:2010;
-
A Sensitization Test per ISO 10993-10:2010
{5}------------------------------------------------
-
Acute Systematic Toxicity per ISO 10993-11:2006;
-
Genotoxicity Tests per ISO 10993-3:2014.
-
- Clinical Test Conclusion
No clinical study is included in this submission.
- Substantially Equivalent (SE) Comparison 8.
| ITEM | Subject Device | Predicate Device |
|---|---|---|
| Crown Dental Zirconia Blank &Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-ShadedBlank | K160367 | |
| Product Code | EIH | EIH |
| RegulationNumber | 872.6660 | 872.6660 |
| Intended Use | Crown Dental Zirconia Blank &Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-ShadedBlank are indicated for the productionof artificial teeth in fixed orremovable dentures, or for jacketcrowns, facings, and veneers. | Nissin Dental Zirconia Blank &Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blankare indicated for the production ofartificial teeth in fixed or removabledentures, or for jacket crowns,facings, and veneers |
| Feature | Colored | Uncolored and Colored |
| Shape | Discs | Semic, Rods, Blocks and Discs |
| Type and Classper ISO 6872:2015 | Type II Class 5 | Type II Class 5 |
| Sterility | Non-sterile | Non-Sterile |
| Chemical | ZrO2>99.0% | ZrO2≥99.0% |
| Composition(Weight %) | Inorganic Pigment(Al2O3, SiO2, Fe2O3, Er2O3) < 1% | Inorganic Pigment(Fe2O3, Er2O3) ≤ 1% |
| CrystalMorphology | Tetragonal | Tetragonal |
| Density | 6.00g/cm³ | 6.00g/cm³ |
| Sinteringtemperature | 1500±50°C | 1500±50°C |
| Performance | Comply with ISO 6872 | Comply with ISO 6872 |
| Contact Level | surface device with permanent contact(>30 days) | surface device with permanentcontact (>30 days) |
| Biocompatibility | ||
| Tested for Cytotoxicity, irritation, sensitization, accurate systematic toxicity, genotoxicity, no adverse react identified. | Tested for Cytotoxicity, irritation, sensitization, accurate systematic toxicity, genotoxicity, no adverse react identified. |
Table 1 Comparison of Technology Characteristics
{6}------------------------------------------------
Subject device, Crown Dental Zirconia Blank & Crown Dental Zirconia Pre-Shaded Blank, is very similar to the predicate device, except for an additional Inorganic Pigment, the difference will not result in any new safety and effectiveness issue.
Substantially Equivalent (SE) Conclusion
Based on the comparison and analysis above, the proposed devices are determined to be Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate devices.
§ 872.6660 Porcelain powder for clinical use.
(a)
Identification. Porcelain powder for clinical use is a device consisting of a mixture of kaolin, felspar, quartz, or other substances intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, of jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The device is used in prosthetic dentistry by heating the powder mixture to a high temperature in an oven to produce a hard prosthesis with a glass-like finish.(b)
Classification. Class II.