(87 days)
Not Found
No
The description focuses on automated biochemical and growth detection methods, with no mention of AI or ML algorithms for interpretation or analysis.
No.
This device is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) system used to identify microorganisms and perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing. It provides information to aid healthcare professionals in diagnosing and treating infections, but it does not directly treat or prevent disease in a patient, which is the definition of a therapeutic device.
Yes
The device is intended for "in vitro quantitative determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)" and for "rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of clinically relevant bacterial isolates." These functions provide information used in the diagnosis and treatment of infections, specifically by determining which antimicrobial agents are effective against specific bacterial isolates.
No
The device description clearly lists hardware components (instrument, panels, broths, indicator solution) in addition to software. It is an automated system that utilizes physical reagents and an instrument for incubation and reading.
Yes, this device is an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states that the system is intended for "in vitro quantitative determination of antimicrobial susceptibility... of most Gram-negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria isolates from pure culture" and "most Gram-positive bacteria isolates from pure culture". The term "in vitro" is a key indicator of an IVD.
- Device Description: The description details a system that analyzes biological samples (bacterial isolates from pure culture) outside of the body to provide diagnostic information (antimicrobial susceptibility).
- Components: The components listed (panels with dried reagents, broths, indicator solution) are typical of IVD test kits and systems used for laboratory analysis.
- Method: The description of the Phoenix AST method as a "broth based microdilution test" and the use of a "redox indicator for the detection of organism growth" are standard techniques used in in vitro diagnostic microbiology.
- Output: The system provides "identification of the isolate, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and category interpretations (susceptible, intermediate, resistant or not susceptible)", which are diagnostic results used to guide patient treatment.
- Performance Studies: The performance studies described compare the device's results to a "CLSI reference broth microdilution method," which is a standard reference method for in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
All of these points align with the definition of an In Vitro Diagnostic device, which is a medical device intended for use in vitro for the examination of specimens derived from the human body solely or principally for the purpose of providing information concerning a physiological or pathological state, or inborn abnormality, or to monitor therapeutic measures. In this case, the device is examining bacterial isolates (derived from the human body) to provide information about their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents, which is crucial for guiding treatment of infections.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System is intended for in vitro quantitative determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of most Gram-negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria isolates from pure culture for Enterobacteriaceae and Non-Enteriaceae and most Gram-positive bacteria isolates from pure culture belonging to the genera Staphylococcus, Enterococcus and Streptococcus.
Ceftolozane/tazobactam has been shown to be active in vitro against most strains of microorganisms listed below, as described in the FDA-approved package insert for this antimicrobial agent.
Active In Vitro and in Clinical Infections Against: Gram-negative bacteria Enterobacter cloacae Escherichia coli Klebsiella oxytoca Klebsiella pneumoniae Proteus mirabilis Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Active In Vitro but clinical significance is unknown: Gram-negative bacteria Citrobacter koseri Morganella morganii Proteus vulgaris Providencia stuartii Serratia liquefaciens Serratia marcescens
Product codes
LON
Device Description
The BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System (Phoenix System) is an automated system for the rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of clinically relevant bacterial isolates. The system includes the following components:
- . BD Phoenix instrument and software.
- . BD Phoenix panels containing biochemicals for organism ID testing and antimicrobial agents for AST determinations.
- . BD Phoenix ID Broth used for performing ID tests and preparing AST Broth inoculum.
- . BD Phoenix AST Broth used for performing AST tests only.
- . BD Phoenix AST Indicator solution added to the AST Broth to aid in bacterial growth determination.
The Phoenix panel is a sealed and self-inoculating molded polystyrene tray with 136 micro-wells containing dried reagents. Organisms for susceptibility testing must be a pure culture and preliminarily identified as a Gram-negative or Gram-positive isolate. Phoenix panels are inoculated with a specified organism density and placed into the instrument. Inoculum for use with the Phoenix system may be prepared either manually or may be automated using the BD PhoenixTM AP System.
The Phoenix AST method is a broth based microdilution test. The Phoenix System utilizes a redox indicator for the detection of organism growth in the presence of an antimicrobial agent. Measurements of changes to the indicator as well as bacterial turbidity are used in the determination of bacterial growth. Each AST panel configuration contains several antimicrobial agents with a wide range of two-fold doubling dilution concentrations.
The instrument houses the panels where they are continuously incubated at a nominal temperature of 35 ℃ ± 1 °C. The instrument takes readings of the panels every 20 minutes. The readings are interpreted to give an identification of the isolate, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and category interpretations, S, I, R or N (susceptible, intermediate, resistant or not susceptible).
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Analytical Performance: Reproducibility
Intra- and inter-site reproducibility of this antimicrobial agent in the BD Phoenix System was evaluated at three sites using a panel of Gram-negative isolates. Each site tested the isolates in triplicate on three different days using one lot of Gram Negative Phoenix panels containing this antimicrobial agent and associated reagents.
The results of the study demonstrate that for this antimicrobial agent and the Gram-negative organisms tested there was an overall reproducibility across test sites of greater than 95% (± 1 dilution) agreement when compared to the test mode.
Clinical Performance Studies
Clinical, stock and challenge isolates were tested across multiple geographically diverse sites across the United States to demonstrate the performance of the Phoenix antimicrobial susceptibility test with a Gram Negative Phoenix Panel containing this antimicrobial agent. Phoenix System results for Challenge set isolates were compared to the expected results. Phoenix System results for clinical isolates were compared to the results obtained from the CLSI reference broth microdilution method.
The performance of the Phoenix System was assessed by calculating Essential Agreement (EA) and Category Agreement (CA) to expected/reference results for all isolates tested. Essential Agreement (EA) occurs when the BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System agrees exactly or within ± one two-fold dilution to the reference result. Category Agreement (CA) occurs when the BD PhoenixTM Automated Microbiology System agrees with the reference method with respect to the FDA categorical interpretive criteria (susceptible, intermediate, resistant or not susceptible).
The following table summarizes the performance for Clinical and Challenge isolates tested in this study:
Antimicrobial: Ceftolozane/tazobactam#, **
Concentration: 0.25/4-32/4 μg/mL
EA (n):
Enterobacteriaceae: 1034 (EA %: 96.5)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa: 145 (EA %: 96.6)
All Organisms: 1179 (EA %: 96.5)
CA (n):
Enterobacteriaceae: 1034 (CA %: 96.8*)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa: 145 (CA %: 98.6)
All Organisms: 1179 (CA %: 97.0*)
Results:
*A very major (vmj) error rate of 18.2% (2/11) was observed with E. coli. EA and CA for E. coli were > 98.5%. Reference method testing performed in replicates on the two vmj error E. coli isolates showed no vmj errors. An additional comparative study that included 66 resistant E. coli isolates also showed no vmj errors.
BD Phoenix Ceftolozane/Tazobactam MIC values tended to be in exact agreement or at least one doubling dilution higher when testing Enterobacteriaceae or P. aeruginosa compared to the reference broth micro-dilution. ** Enzyme group characterization was not available at the time of comparative testing, and therefore the performance of the BD Phoenix Ceftolozane/Tazobactam is unknown for the following: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (chromosomal AmpC, loss of OprD, and up-regulation MexXY, MexAB); Enterobacteriaceae (metallo-beta-lactamases).
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Essential Agreement (EA), Category Agreement (CA), very major (vmj) error rate.
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 866.1645 Fully automated short-term incubation cycle antimicrobial susceptibility system.
(a)
Identification. A fully automated short-term incubation cycle antimicrobial susceptibility system is a device that incorporates concentrations of antimicrobial agents into a system for the purpose of determining in vitro susceptibility of bacterial pathogens isolated from clinical specimens. Test results obtained from short-term (less than 16 hours) incubation are used to determine the antimicrobial agent of choice to treat bacterial diseases.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems; Guidance for Industry and FDA.”
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the text "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
January 5, 2018
Becton, Dickinson, and Company Laura Stewart Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7 Loveton Circle Mc 694 Sparks, Maryland 21152
Re: K173252
Trade/Device Name: BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System - GN Ceftolozane/tazobactam (0.25/4-32/4 µg/mL) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.1645 Regulation Name: Fully automated short-term incubation cycle antimicrobial susceptibility system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LON Dated: October 6, 2017 Received: October 10, 2017
Dear Laura Stewart:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR
1
Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Ribhi Shawar -S For
Uwe Scherf, M.Sc., Ph.D. Director Division of Microbiology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2020 See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known) K173252
Device Name
BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System - GN Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (0.25/4-32/4ug/mL)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System is intended for in vitro quantitative determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of most Gram-negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria isolates from pure culture for Enterobacteriaceae and Non-Enteriaceae and most Gram-positive bacteria isolates from pure culture belonging to the genera Staphylococcus, Enterococcus and Streptococcus.
Ceftolozane/tazobactam has been shown to be active in vitro against most strains of microorganisms listed below, as described in the FDA-approved package insert for this antimicrobial agent.
Active In Vitro and in Clinical Infections Against: Gram-negative bacteria Enterobacter cloacae Escherichia coli Klebsiella oxytoca Klebsiella pneumoniae Proteus mirabilis Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Active In Vitro but clinical significance is unknown: Gram-negative bacteria Citrobacter koseri Morganella morganii Proteus vulgaris Providencia stuartii Serratia liquefaciens Serratia marcescens
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) 区Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
□Over-The Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
3
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov " An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (7/17)
4
510(k) Summary:
BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System - GN Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (0.25/4-32/4 μg/mL)
Summary Preparation Date:
10/6/2017
Submitted by:
BD Diagnostic Systems Becton, Dickinson and Company 7 Loveton Circle Sparks, Maryland 21152
Contact:
Laura Stewart Regulatory Affairs Specialist Tel: 410-316-4435 Fax: 410-316-4188 Email: laura.stewart@bd.com
Proprietary Names:
BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System – GN Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (0.25/4-32/4 μg/mL)
Common Names: Antimicrobial susceptibility test system-short incubation
Regulatory Information
Regulation section: 21 CFR 866.1645 Fully automated short-term incubation cycle antimicrobial susceptibility system.
Classification: Class II
Review Panel: Microbiology
Product Code: LON
Predicate Device
BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System - GN Tigecycline (0.25-16 µg/mL) [510(k) K132909]
5
Device Establishment
Becton, Dickinson and Company 7 Loveton Circle Sparks. Marvland 21152 Registration Number: 1119779
Performance Standards
Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems. August 28. 2009.
CLSI M100 27th Edition, Performance Standards For Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, (InVitro Diagnostics). Recognition Number 7-271.
CLSI M07-A10, Methods For Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests For Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard - Tenth Edition. (InVitro Diagnostics). Recognition Number 7-254.
Intended Use
The BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System is intended for the in virro rapid identification (ID) and quantitative determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of most Gram negative aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae and non-Enterobacteriaceae.
Special Conditions for Use Statement: For prescription use.
Special Instrument Requirements: BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System
Device Description
The BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System (Phoenix System) is an automated system for the rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of clinically relevant bacterial isolates. The system includes the following components:
- . BD Phoenix instrument and software.
- . BD Phoenix panels containing biochemicals for organism ID testing and antimicrobial agents for AST determinations.
- . BD Phoenix ID Broth used for performing ID tests and preparing AST Broth inoculum.
- . BD Phoenix AST Broth used for performing AST tests only.
- . BD Phoenix AST Indicator solution added to the AST Broth to aid in bacterial growth determination.
The Phoenix panel is a sealed and self-inoculating molded polystyrene tray with 136 micro-wells containing dried reagents. Organisms for susceptibility testing must be a pure culture and preliminarily identified as a Gram-negative or Gram-positive isolate. Phoenix panels are inoculated with a specified organism density and placed into the instrument. Inoculum for use with the Phoenix system may be prepared either manually or may be automated using the BD PhoenixTM AP System.
The Phoenix AST method is a broth based microdilution test. The Phoenix System utilizes a redox indicator for the detection of organism growth in the presence of an antimicrobial agent. Measurements of changes to
6
the indicator as well as bacterial turbidity are used in the determination of bacterial growth. Each AST panel configuration contains several antimicrobial agents with a wide range of two-fold doubling dilution concentrations.
The instrument houses the panels where they are continuously incubated at a nominal temperature of 35 ℃ ± 1 °C. The instrument takes readings of the panels every 20 minutes. The readings are interpreted to give an identification of the isolate, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and category interpretations, S, I, R or N (susceptible, intermediate, resistant or not susceptible).
Device Comparison
The BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System demonstrated substantially equivalent performance for inoculum prepared manually and inoculum prepared with the BD Phoenix™ AP instrument when compared with the CLSI reference broth microdilution method. This premarket notification provides data supporting the use of the BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System Gram negative ID/AST or AST only Phoenix panels with this antimicrobial agent.
Summary of Substantial Equivalence= Testing
The BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System has demonstrated substantially equivalent performance when compared to the CLSI reference broth microdilution method (AST panels prepared according to CLSI M07). The system has been evaluated as defined in the FDA guidance document, "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems; Guidance for Industry and FDA", August 28, 2009. Shelf life (stability data) for the drug is being collected and will be maintained on file at BD as indicated in the guidance document.
Analytical Performance
Reproducibility
Intra- and inter-site reproducibility of this antimicrobial agent in the BD Phoenix System was evaluated at three sites using a panel of Gram-negative isolates. Each site tested the isolates in triplicate on three different days using one lot of Gram Negative Phoenix panels containing this antimicrobial agent and associated reagents.
The results of the study demonstrate that for this antimicrobial agent and the Gram-negative organisms tested there was an overall reproducibility across test sites of greater than 95% (± 1 dilution) agreement when compared to the test mode.
Clinical Performance Studies
Clinical, stock and challenge isolates were tested across multiple geographically diverse sites across the United States to demonstrate the performance of the Phoenix antimicrobial susceptibility test with a Gram
The term "substantial equivalence" as used in this 510(k) notification is limited to the definition of substantial equivalence as found in the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended and as applied under 21 CFR 807, Subpart E under which a device can be marketed without pre-market approval or reclassification of substantial equivalency under this notification is not intended to have any bearing whatsoever on the resolution of patent infringement suits or any other patent matters. No statements related to, or in support of substantial equivalence herein shall be construed as an admission against interest under the US Patent Laws or their application by the courts.
7
Negative Phoenix Panel containing this antimicrobial agent. Phoenix System results for Challenge set isolates were compared to the expected results. Phoenix System results for clinical isolates were compared to the results obtained from the CLSI reference broth microdilution method.
The performance of the Phoenix System was assessed by calculating Essential Agreement (EA) and Category Agreement (CA) to expected/reference results for all isolates tested. Essential Agreement (EA) occurs when the BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System agrees exactly or within ± one two-fold dilution to the reference result. Category Agreement (CA) occurs when the BD PhoenixTM Automated Microbiology System agrees with the reference method with respect to the FDA categorical interpretive criteria (susceptible, intermediate, resistant or not susceptible).
The following table summarizes the performance for Clinical and Challenge isolates tested in this study.
Antimicrobial | Concentration | EA (n) | EA (%) | CA (n) | CA (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ceftolozane/tazobactam#, ** | 0.25/4-32/4 μg/mL | Enterobacteriaceae | |||
1034 | 96.5 | 1034 | 96.8* | ||
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | |||||
145 | 96.6 | 145 | 98.6 | ||
All Organisms | |||||
1179 | 96.5 | 1179 | 97.0* |
Performance of BD Phoenix System for Ceftolozane/tazobactam with GN Organisms
*A very major (vmj) error rate of 18.2% (2/11) was observed with E. coli. EA and CA for E. coli were > 98.5%. Reference method testing performed in replicates on the two vmj error E. coli isolates showed no vmj errors. An additional comparative study that included 66 resistant E. coli isolates also showed no vmj errors.
BD Phoenix Ceftolozane/Tazobactam MIC values tended to be in exact agreement or at least one doubling dilution higher when testing Enterobacteriaceae or P. aeruginosa compared to the reference broth micro-dilution. ** Enzyme group characterization was not available at the time of comparative testing, and therefore the performance of the BD Phoenix Ceftolozane/Tazobactam is unknown for the following: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (chromosomal AmpC, loss of OprD, and up-regulation MexXY, MexAB); Enterobacteriaceae (metallo-beta-lactamases).
Conclusions Drawn from Substantial Equivalence Studies
The data collected from the substantial equivalence studies demonstrate that testing on the BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System with this antimicrobial agent is substantially equivalent as outlined in the FDA draft guidance document, "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems; Guidance for Industry and FDA", August 28, 2009. Technological characteristics of this system are substantially equivalent to those used in the BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System - GN Tigecycline (0.25-16 ug/mL), which received approval by the FDA under 510(k) number K132909, February 14, 2014.