(269 days)
When a mechanical alignment approach is utilized, this device is indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to:
- Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis.
- Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle.
- Post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy.
- Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities.
- The salvage of previously failed surgical attempts or for a knee in which satisfactory stability in flexion cannot be obtained at the time of surgery.
When a kinematic alignment approach is utilized, this device is indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to:
- Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis.
- Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle.
- Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities.
The kinematic alignment (KA) surgical technique may only be used with Persona CR femoral components, Persona CR or UC articular surface components, and cemented nonporous Persona tibial components without a stem extension.
Porous coated components may be used cemented or uncemented (biological fixation). All other femoral, tibial baseplate, stem extension, and all-polyethylene (UHMWPE and VEHXPE) patella components are indicated for cemented use only.
The subject Persona Personalized Knee System components are identical to the predicate Persona Personalized Knee System components. Introduction of a kinematic alignment technique for use with the Persona Personalized Knee System CR and UC components does not change the intended use or the fundamental scientific technology of the associated implants.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Zimmer® Persona® Personalized Knee System, focusing on the addition of a kinematic alignment surgical technique. It does not contain information about the acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/medical device. Instead, it details the regulatory process for a knee replacement system.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided document. The document describes a traditional medical device (knee implant) rather than a software-as-a-medical-device (SaMD) or an AI-powered diagnostic device, which typically involves the kind of performance studies and acceptance criteria you've asked about (sensitivity, specificity, AUROC, etc.).
The "Summary of Performance Data" section lists non-clinical tests related to the mechanical performance of the knee system, not diagnostic accuracy or AI model performance.
§ 888.3565 Knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis.
(a)
Identification. A knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device is designed to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement. This identification includes fixed-bearing knee prostheses where the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene tibial bearing is rigidly secured to the metal tibial base plate.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's guidance: “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 888.1 for the availability of this guidance.