(267 days)
The hip prosthesis M-Vizion is designed for cementless use in total or partial hip arthroplasty in primary or revision surgery.
Hip Replacement is indicated in the following cases:
- Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid polyarthritis, or congenital hip dysplasia.
- Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
- Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck.
- Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement.
The M-Vizion Femoral Revision System is a modular cementless stem intended to be used for hip arthroplasty in primary or revision surgery. The system is composed of the proximal body, the distal stem, and the locking screw. The proximal body and the distal stem are intended to be assembled together on a conical coupling and tightened by the locking screw.
The proximal body is made of titanium alloy and coated with a titanium coating, TiGrowth -C (Medacta commercial name: Mectagrip). The distal stem is a straight stem made of titanium alloy and the principal feature consists of shard fins that potentially increase the rotation stability. The locking screw is made of titanium alloy and coated with TiNbN.
The provided text describes the M-Vizion Femoral Revision System, a medical device, and its demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate devices. However, it does not include specific acceptance criteria with numerical values for performance, nor does it detail a standalone study that directly proves the device meets such criteria in a comparative effectiveness manner with effect sizes or human reader performance.
The document primarily focuses on non-clinical performance tests performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence, rather than establishing acceptance criteria or reporting performance against them in a table format.
Therefore, much of the requested information cannot be extracted directly from the provided text. Below, I will present the information that can be inferred or directly stated, and clearly indicate what is not available.
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document lists performance tests conducted but does not specify the numerical acceptance criteria for these tests or provide specific reported numerical performance values. It only states that the tests "met the acceptance criteria that were based on standards."
| Test Parameter | Acceptance Criteria (from Standards) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Range of Motion (ROM) | Based on EN ISO 21535:2009 | Met acceptance criteria |
| Shaft Fatigue Testing | Based on ISO 7206-4 Third Edition 2010-06-15 | Met acceptance criteria |
| Modular Conical Connection Fatigue Test | Based on ISO 7206-4 Third Edition 2010-06-15 | Met acceptance criteria |
| Post Fatigue Fretting Corrosion Analysis | Based on ISO 7206-4 Third Edition 2010-06-15 | Met acceptance criteria |
| Neck Fatigue Testing | Based on ISO 7206-6 Second edition 2013-11-15 | Met acceptance criteria |
| Pull-off Force Testing | Based on ASTM F2009-00 (Reapproved 2011) | Met acceptance criteria |
| Coating Characterization Tests | Based on characterization reports | Met acceptance criteria |
| Bacterial Endotoxin Test (LAL test) | Endotoxin limit of <20 EU/device | Met the endotoxin limit of <20 EU/device |
2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance
The document does not specify the sample sizes (e.g., number of devices tested) for the non-clinical performance tests. All testing appears to be non-clinical (laboratory-based) with no human data involved, so provenance like "country of origin of data" or "retrospective/prospective" is not applicable in the human data sense.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. The tests are non-clinical, mechanical, and material characteristic tests against established international standards. There is no "ground truth" in the sense of expert medical diagnosis or interpretation.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
Not applicable. There is no human adjudication for non-clinical performance tests against standards. Compliance is typically determined by test engineers and quality control personnel.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is a hip implant, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool. No MRMC study was conducted.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This device is a hip implant. The "standalone" performance refers to the device's mechanical and material properties as tested against industry standards.
7. The type of ground truth used
The "ground truth" for the non-clinical performance tests were the specifications and requirements defined in the referenced international standards (e.g., EN ISO 21535:2009, ISO 7206-4, ISO 7206-6, ASTM F2009-00). For the Bacterial Endotoxin Test, the ground truth was the specified endotoxin limit of <20 EU/device.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. There is no mention of a "training set" as this is not an AI/ML-based device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of medical device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
November 29, 2017
Medacta International SA % Ms. Elizabeth Rose Manager, Regulatory Affairs Mapi USA, Inc. 2343 Alexandria Drive, Suite 100 Lexington, Kentucky 40504
Re: K170690
Trade/Device Name: M-Vizion Femoral Revision System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3353 Regulation Name: Hip Joint Metal/Ceramic/Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented or Nonporous Uncemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LZO, KWY Dated: October 30, 2017 Received: October 31, 2017
Dear Ms. Rose:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820);
{1}------------------------------------------------
and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K170690
Device Name
M-Vizion Femoral Revision System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The hip prosthesis M-Vizion is designed for cementless use in total or partial hip arthroplasty in primary or revision surgery.
Hip Replacement is indicated in the following cases:
- · Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatoid polyarthritis, or congenital hip dysplasia.
- · Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
- · Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck.
- · Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- |
| ☒ Presentation Use (Part 21 CFR 301 Subject to Reporting) |
|---|
| ☐ Own-Firm Use (Part 21 CFR 301 Subject to Reporting) |
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
3.0 510(k) Summary
I. Submitter
Medacta International SA Strada Regina 6874 Castel San Pietro (CH) Switzerland Phone (+41) 91 696 60 60 Fax (+41) 91 696 60 66
Contact Person: Stefano Baj, Regulatory Affairs Manager Date Prepared: March 6, 2017 Date Revised: November 21, 2017
II. Device
| Device Proprietary Name: | M-Vizion Femoral Revision System |
|---|---|
| Common or Usual Name: | Total Hip Prosthesis |
| Classification Name: | Hip joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented ornonporous uncemented prosthesis |
| Primary Product Code: | LZO |
| Secondary Product Code: | KWY |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 888.3353, 21 CFR 888.3390 |
| Device Classification | 2 |
III. Predicate Device
Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following devices: Primary Predicate:
- . Revision Femoral Stem, K151739, Limacorporate S.p.A.
- Wagner SL Revision Stem Lateral, Wagner Cone Prosthesis® System, K161192, Zimmer o GmbH
Reference Devices
- MasterLoc Stem, K151531, Medacta International SA
- MasterLoc Stem, K160289, Medacta International SA ●
{4}------------------------------------------------
IV. Device Description
The purpose of this submission is to gain clearance for the M-Vizion Femoral Revision System. The M-Vizion Femoral Revision System is a modular cementless stem intended to be used for hip arthroplasty in primary or revision surgery. The system is composed of the proximal body, the distal stem, and the locking screw. The proximal body and the distal stem are intended to be assembled together on a conical coupling and tightened by the locking screw.
The proximal body is made of titanium alloy and coated with a titanium coating, TiGrowth -C (Medacta commercial name: Mectagrip). The distal stem is a straight stem made of titanium alloy and the principal feature consists of shard fins that potentially increase the rotation stability. The locking screw is made of titanium alloy and coated with TiNbN.
The M-Vizion Femoral Revision System is similar to competitor predicate devices Limacorporate S.p.A.'s Revision Femoral Stem (K151739), Zimmer GmbH's Wagner SL Revision Stem Lateral, Wagner Cone Prosthesis® System (K161192) and reference device Medacta's MasterLoc Stem (K151531 and K160289).
V. Indications for Use
The hip prosthesis M-Vizion is designed for cementless use in total or partial hip arthroplasty in primary or revision surgery.
Hip Replacement is indicated in the following cases:
- Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, ● rheumatoid polyarthritis, or congenital hip dysplasia.
- Avascular necrosis of the femoral head. ●
- Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck.
- Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement.
VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The M-Vizion Femoral Revision System and the predicate devices share the following characteristics:
- indications for use:
- materials: ●
- design;
- sterile: ●
- coating: and ●
- device usage.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The M-Vizion Femoral Revision System is technologically different from the predicate devices as follows:
- . sizes:
- lengths: and
- diameters.
VII. Performance Data
The following performance tests are being provided in support of a substantial equivalence determination. Testing was conducted to written protocols with acceptance criteria that were based on standards.
Non-Clinical Studies
- 0 Performance Tests
- range of motion (ROM): EN ISO 21535:2009 Non-Active Surgical Implants o Joint Replacement Implants - Specific Requirements For Hip-Joint Replacement Implants;
- shaft fatigue testing: ISO 7206-4 Third Edition 2010-06-15 Implants for surgery o Partial and total hip joint prostheses - Part 4: Determination of endurance properties and performance of stemmed femoral components [Including AMENDMENT 1 (2016)];
- modular conical connection fatigue test, and
- post fatigue fretting corrosion analysis.
- neck fatigue testing: ISO 7206-6 Second edition 2013-11-15 Implants For Surgery o - Partial And Total Hip Joint Prostheses - Part 6: Determination Of Endurance Properties Of Head And Neck Region Of Stemmed Femoral Components;
- pull off force testing: ASTM F2009-00 (Reapproved 2011) Standard Test Method o for Determining the Axial Disassembly Force of Taper Connections of Modular Prostheses; and
- coating characterization tests: o
- characterization report of titanium coating on Ti6A17Nb substrates for ■ orthopedic; and
- characterization report of TiNbN coating on cobalt chrome, titanium alloy, and stainless steel substrates for orthopedic.
- Pyrogenicity ●
- о Bacterial Endotoxin Test (LAL test) was conducted and met the endotoxin limit of <20 EU/device; and
- Medacta has no intentions of labeling the subject devices as non-pyrogenic or o pyrogen free.
Clinical Studies
- No clinical studies were conducted. 0
{6}------------------------------------------------
VIII. Conclusion
The information provided above supports that the M-Vizion Femoral Revision System is as safe and effective as the predicate devices. Therefore, it is concluded that the M-Vizion Femoral Revision System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
-----------------------------------This space intentionally left blank--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 888.3353 Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis.
(a)
Identification. A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.(b)
Classification. Class II.