(48 days)
The XRpad2 3025 HWC-M, when used with a radiographic imaging system, is indicated for use in generating radiographic images of human anatomy for diagnostic X-ray procedures, wherever conventional screen-film (SF), digital radiography (DR), or computed radiography (CR) systems may be used. It is not intended for mammonfions .
standard X-ray cassette Bucky
- topad IPU-2 (Interface and Power Un
- KRpad LPT2 Detector Cable
- XRpad Protective Insert 307
- OV Cable IEC 60320 C13
- ........ Cable IEC 60320 CLS
- frigger Cable 5 m/16.5
- ger Cable 20 m/65
- GigE Interface Cable 15.25 m/ Interface Cable 7.6 m/2
- E Interface Cable 30.5 m/100
The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification for the PerkinElmer XRpad2 3025 HWC-M Flat Panel Detector. It seeks to prove substantial equivalence to a predicate device (PerkinElmer XRpad 4336 MED, K140551) rather than demonstrating that the device meets specific acceptance criteria through a clinical study with a test set of human images.
Therefore, many of the requested elements regarding acceptance criteria, study design, and ground truth establishment for a clinical performance study on human images are not explicitly present or applicable in this document because the submission focuses on non-clinical performance and technical equivalence for an X-ray detector, not an AI/CADe device that interprets images. This document describes the device itself and its technical performance, not its diagnostic accuracy in a clinical setting with human readers.
However, I can extract information related to the technical performance of the device, which serves as the "acceptance criteria" and "proof" in the context of this 510(k) submission.
Summary of Device Acceptance Criteria and Performance (Based on Technical Equivalence):
This submission is a 510(k) for an X-ray flat panel detector, not an AI or CADe device. The "acceptance criteria" here are based on demonstrating that the new device's technical specifications and performance are substantially equivalent to a previously cleared predicate device, ensuring it performs as intended for generating radiographic images.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
| Characteristic (Acceptance Criteria - implicitly comparable to predicate) | Predicate Device (XRpad 4336 MED, K140551) | Proposed Device (XRpad2 3025 HWC-M) | Fulfilled? (Based on "Same" or acceptable differences) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intended Use / Indications for Use | Generating radiographic images of human anatomy for diagnostic X-ray procedures. Not for mammographic use. | Same | Yes |
| Scintillator | Direct deposition CsI:Tl | Same | Yes |
| Pixel pitch | 100 µm | Same | Yes |
| Limiting resolution | 5 lp/mm | Same | Yes |
| Binning capable | 2x2 binning for 200 µm | Same | Yes |
| Communication interface | Gb Ethernet or 802.11n WiFi | Same | Yes |
| WiFi band | 5.1-5.3 GHz | 5.1-5.9 GHz | Yes (Wider band acceptable) |
| X-ray synchronization interface | Dedicated trigger in/out signal lines or Automatic Exposure Detection | Same | Yes |
| Power | External power supply or battery | Same | Yes |
| Software library | Windows OS | Windows and Linux OS | Yes (Expanded OS support acceptable) |
| Key Physical Differences (Not direct "acceptance criteria" but noted) | |||
| Pixel matrix | 3556 x 4320 pixels | 2508 x 3004 pixels | Different (Smaller size, noted as "decrease in dimensions") |
| Data transmit area | 355 mm x 432 mm | 250 mm x 300 mm | Different (Smaller size, noted as "decrease in dimensions") |
| External dimensions (w x l x h) | 384 mm x 460 mm x 15 mm | 282 mm x 332 mm x 15.5 mm | Different (Smaller size) |
| Weight | 3.8 kg | 1.8 kg | Different (Lighter) |
| Housing material | Aluminum with carbon-fiber | Same | Yes |
| Finish | Matte carbon-fiber front with white silk-screen active area markers | Same | Yes |
Note: The document states "The modifications are related to the decrease in dimensions and does not impact image quality." This implies that while the dimensions are different, the critical image quality parameters, which are the 'acceptance criteria' for this type of device, are maintained.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- This is a non-clinical performance study. The "test set" consists of the device itself undergoing various physical and electrical performance tests.
- The document explicitly states: "PerkinElmer has performed internal non-clinical testing to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the XRpad2 3025 HWC-M Flat Panel Detector."
- There is no mention of a sample size of human images or data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) because this submission is about the technical performance of the X-ray detector hardware, not its diagnostic performance on patient images assessed by humans or AI.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):
- Not applicable. This submission relies on engineering and physics measurements to establish the performance of the X-ray detector, not diagnostic interpretations by medical experts. The ground truth for this device's performance would be derived from quantitative measurements like DQE, MTF, resolution, etc., performed in a lab setting.
- The document mentions "BE and MTF are comparable to the predicate device. The non-clinics [sic] findings show that the detector complies with standards and regulations." This refers to objective physical measurements.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not applicable. There is no human image interpretation in this submission, so no adjudication of expert opinions is required.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not applicable. This is an X-ray detector, not an AI or CADe device. No MRMC study was performed or is relevant for this type of 510(k) submission.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable. This is an X-ray detector, not an algorithm, so "standalone performance" in the context of AI is not relevant. Its "standalone performance" is its technical image acquisition capabilities.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- The ground truth for this device's "performance" is based on quantitative physical measurements (e.g., Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) to assess spatial resolution, Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE) to assess dose efficiency, electrical and mechanical tests) according to recognized industry standards (e.g., IEC standards, as implied by "complies with standards and regulations").
- The document specifically mentions "BE and MTF are comparable to the predicate device." BE likely refers to "Beam Energy" or some other physical characteristic.
8. The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable. This is a hardware device. It does not use a "training set" in the machine learning sense. Its design and validation are based on engineering principles and physical testing.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable. As above, no training set for machine learning is involved.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features the department's name in a circular arrangement around the perimeter. In the center is a stylized graphic of what appears to be a human figure.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
September 1, 2016
PerkinElmer, Inc. % Ms. Dawn M. Spooner Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs 940 Winter Street WALTHAM MA 02451
Re: K161942
Trade/Device Name: XRpad2 3025 HWC-M Flat Panel Detector Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1680 Regulation Name: Stationary x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MQB Dated: July 14, 2016 Received: July 15, 2016
Dear Ms. Spooner:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Michael D'Hara
For
Robert Ochs, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K161942
Device Name
XRpad2 3025 HWC-M Flat Panel Detector
Indications for Use (Describe)
The XRpad2 3025 HWC-M, when used with a radiographic imaging system, is indicated for use in generating radiographic images of human anatomy for diagnostic X-ray procedures, wherever conventional screen-film (SF), digital radiography (DR), or computed radiography (CR) systems may be used. It is not intended for mammonfions .
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
olsand
əsinə aid bərində aid bir və qarşına qalındığı var. Azərbaycan filmlərinin siyahıya əlin qırmızı viri
The assigned 510(k) number is: X161942
910Z 'SI Isnany
| Submitted By: | PerkinElmer Medical Imaging2175 Mission College Blvd.Santa Clara, CA 95054U.S.A. |
|---|---|
| Contact Person: | Dawn SpoonerAssociate Director, Regulatory AffairsTel. 781-663-6071Fax. 781-663-5969 |
| Device Name: | PerkinElmer XRpad2 3025 HWC-M Flat Panel Detector |
| Classification: | Product Code: MQBClassification Name: Stationary X-ray SystemClassification Regulation: 21 CFR 892.1680 |
| Predicate Device: | PerkinElmer XRpad 4336 MED Flat Panel Detector510(k) Clearance: K140551; August 1, 2014Product Code: MQBClassification Name: Stationary X-ray SystemClassification Regulation: 21 CFR 892.1680 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
evice Description
standard X-ray cassette Bucky ﻳﻮﻧﻴﻮ ﻟﻮﻃﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ in sug doily .unu c.cl x mm 0.282 × um 0.282 × um 0.282 × mm winioni
- Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- topad IPU-2 (Interface and Power Un
- KRpad LPT2 Detector Cable
- XRpad Protective Insert 307
- OV Cable IEC 60320 C13
- ........ Cable IEC 60320 CLS
- frigger Cable 5 m/16.5
- ger Cable 20 m/65
- GigE Interface Cable 15.25 m/ Interface Cable 7.6 m/2
- E Interface Cable 30.5 m/100
Indications For Use
əsn ondare o (ЯП) үүдбэлэгийн төрий (ЧЗ) шүү-пээлэг төлөлтөлтөг тэлэгээгүй хэлийн хэлийн хэлийн хэлийн and and
{5}------------------------------------------------
Comparison Chart
| Characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use /Indications forUse | The XRpad 4336 MED when usedwith a radiographic imaging system, isindicated for use in generatingradiographic images of humananatomy for diagnostic X-rayprocedures, wherever conventionalscreen-film (SF), digital radiography(DR), or computed radiography (CR)systems may be used. It is not intendedfor mammographic use. | Same |
| Model | PerkinElmerXRpad 4336 MED(K140551) | Proposed ModelPerkinElmerXRpad2 3025 HWC-M |
| Panel | ||
| Scintillator | Direct deposition CsI:Tl | Same |
| Pixel pitch | $100 \mu m$ | Same |
| Pixel matrix | 3556 × 4320 pixels | 2508 × 3004 |
| Limitingresolution | 5 lp/mm | Same |
| Binningcapable | 2 x 2 binning for 200 $\mu m$ | Same |
| Data transmitarea | 355 mm x 432 mm | 250 mm x 300 mm |
| Externaldimensions(w x l x h) | 384 mm x 460 mm × 15 mm | 282 mm x 332 mm × 15.5 mm |
| Weight | 3.8 kg | 1.8 kg |
| Housingmaterial | Aluminum with carbon-fiber | Same |
| Finish | Matte carbon-fiber front with whitesilk-screen active area markers | Same |
| Communicationinterface | Gb Ethernet or 802.11n WiFi | Same |
| WiFi band | 5.1-5.3 GHz | 5.1-5.9 GHz |
| X-raysynchronizationinterface | Dedicated trigger in/out signal lines orAutomatic Exposure Detection | Same |
| Power | External power supply or battery | Same |
| Softwarelibrary | Windows OS | Windows and Linux OS |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Summary of Studies
compared the producite Personal internet Association are similar. unsterials, are similar in design and construction, and have the same intended uss Contraction and physics of the PerkinElment Kepth 2015 320 F pus yaoloudsat ultimiz sziliyu soivel sissipsing brokes sinning similaring suit lates to the decrease in dimensions and does not impact image quality
vs w . ອີກາ່າວະ 1821 ເມກາວເປັນ ລາວ. internal no-climical testing, complies with standards and regulations such as U duros Allufessans san rollosted to MCC MH OMH ST0C Thed Ax and Huiyan and A x (CEM ESA SSAI CAX) add this the states and leasters now a osh are and and and and of aldesting the (CEM ESA CC91 CAX) SCAZZTX Trodums As a 6 MED device.
many of Design Control and Risk Managemen
not impact image quality MED (X 140551). The modifications are related to the decrease in dimensions and sque 2025 HWC-M flat panel X-ray detector is modification of the Reppe
A min and and and a more a fit de descreative de server many and be by Free cessfully mitigated and accepted is modification were reviewed and implemented as part of product desi suditiones suobrezed bue system befinant in tall boblyono tusursesss The specific risk control supprective measures to mitigate th
Summary of Non-Clinical Data
ət qarının ədən və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və və v U se your suoiitelus ar pue spreparis parders partis souring un onels vince lettings on attensured and status submittee and with the the sentively of the entineling of the Park in the Promise of the Promotion consisted for sonly be ine min physis in the super of the RPports of Sevice, PerkinElmer has performed internal non-clinical testing an BE and MTF are comparable to the predicate device. The non-clinics
{7}------------------------------------------------
Substantist Equiivalency
ən səsinə qalınmış var. məlimis ərə salarının bir yazırlığında olunur. Bu mənis məsl od de detected and and the read on the segent only of the seguires in asn tot bepared signing software of the X-ray uniti
Conclusion.
its intended use. supeps si bur single sousides sus states the sprepatis and is and is a a pure
in fəsiləsindən filmlərinə aid olunan filmlərinin filmlərində vasitəsinə aid (123041) CIN əsinə aid bir və bulunun məqli (xi)01 ç sidir ui bərldqus qortanından ən bir mənələrini əsasən
§ 892.1680 Stationary x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. A stationary x-ray system is a permanently installed diagnostic system intended to generate and control x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). A radiographic contrast tray or radiology diagnostic kit intended for use with a stationary x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.