K Number
K161212
Date Cleared
2016-09-30

(155 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
N/A
Panel
SU
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Atteris Antimicrobial Barrier Film Dressing is intended for application to minor wounds and damaged skin as a liquid, film forming barrier, which creates a waterproof, film dressing, protecting the wound or damaged skin.

Device Description

Atteris™ Antimicrobial Barrier Film Dressing is a polymeric solution which forms a uniform film when applied to minor wounds and damaged skin. The product is dispersed in a unique non-cytotoxic, non-stinging solution via a standard 28 mL pump spray bottle. The product is biocompatible, non-stinging, fast drying, and has low friction. Antimicrobial Barrier Film Dressing protects minor wounds and damaged skin by providing a secure, breathable, waterproof barrier to external contaminates. The film dressing is colorless, transparent, and possesses good oxygen and moisture vapor permeability. The antimicrobial PHMB at a concentration of 0.001% w/w is added to the product as a preservative to inhibit the growth of microorganisms within the product.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the "Atteris Antimicrobial Barrier Film Dressing" and focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than presenting a study to prove a device meets specific acceptance criteria in the context of AI/machine learning performance.

Therefore, most of the requested information regarding AI/ML study design (sample size for test/training sets, data provenance, expert ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance) is not applicable to this document.

However, I can extract the acceptance criteria and reported device performance from the provided "Performance Testing" section.

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
Preservative Effectiveness (USP 51)Broad spectrum activity demonstrated against 5 organisms (Gram positive, Gram negative, and fungal types). Total kill was achieved for 24 hours at >6 log of each organism: P. aeruginosa, E. coli, C. albicans, S. aureus, A. brasiliensis. Performance was sustained initially and at several points during aging. This indicates the product is preserved using PHMB.
Biocompatibility (ISO 10993 parts 1, 5, 10)The device is non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, and non-irritating. This was demonstrated through cytotoxicity, sensitization, and irritation studies.
Shelf Life StabilityReal-time aging studies indicate the product is expected to be stable and effective for a shelf life of 6 months.

Answers to other questions based on the provided document:

  1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective): Not applicable. The document describes in-vitro lab testing, not a clinical study with a "test set" of patients/data.
  2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable.
  3. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.
  4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.
  5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.
  6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): The "ground truth" or reference standards for the performance tests were established using recognized international standards and methods, specifically:
    • USP 51 for antimicrobial effectiveness.
    • ISO 10993 parts 1, 5, and 10 for biocompatibility.
  7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.
  8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

In summary, this document is a regulatory submission for a medical device (a film dressing) and its performance is evaluated through standard laboratory and biocompatibility testing, not through AI/ML performance studies.

N/A