(160 days)
Yes
The device description explicitly states that the Ahead 300 provides an "algorithmbased structural injury classification of head injured patients using EEG features." While it doesn't use the terms AI or ML directly, the use of an algorithm to classify structural injury based on complex EEG features strongly suggests the application of machine learning or a similar advanced algorithmic approach, especially given the context of improving accuracy over a previous version. The performance study also focuses on metrics like sensitivity, specificity, and NPV, which are common in evaluating the performance of classification algorithms, including those based on ML.
No
The device is indicated for aid in evaluation and diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and does not provide therapy or treatment.
Yes
The device is intended to "aid in the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI)" and provides "Structural Injury Classification" that "likely corresponds to those with no structural brain injury visible on head CT" or "likely corresponds to those with a structural brain injury visible on head CT." This clearly indicates its role in supporting the diagnostic process.
No
The device description explicitly states it is a "portable, non-invasive, non-radiation emitting, point of care device" and mentions utilizing "brain electrical activity utilizing the calculation of standard quantitative EEG (QEEG) parameters from frontal locations on a patient's forehead." This indicates the device includes hardware components for acquiring EEG signals, not just software processing.
Based on the provided information, the Ahead 300 is not an In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) device.
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are devices intended for use in the collection, preparation, and examination of specimens taken from the human body (such as blood, urine, or tissue) to obtain information for diagnostic purposes.
- Ahead 300's Function: The Ahead 300 is a non-invasive device that records and analyzes brain electrical activity (EEG) from the patient's forehead. It does not involve the collection or analysis of specimens taken from the body.
- Intended Use: The intended use describes the device as an adjunct to clinical practice to aid in the evaluation of patients with closed head injuries. While it provides information to support diagnosis, it does so by analyzing electrical signals directly from the body, not from a specimen.
Therefore, the Ahead 300 falls under the category of a medical device that performs analysis in vivo (within the living body), rather than in vitro (in glass or outside the living body).
No
The letter does not explicitly state that the FDA has reviewed and approved or cleared a Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) for this specific device.
Intended Use / Indications for Use
· The Ahead 300 is indicated for use as an adjunct to standard clinical practice to aid in the evaluation of patients who are being considered for a head CT, who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, present with a Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) of 13-15, and are between the ages of 18-85 years. The Ahead 300 should not be used as a substitute for a CT scan.
· The Ahead 300 device is intended to record, measure, and display brain electrical activity utilizing the calculation of standard quantitative EEG (QEEG) parameters from frontal locations on a patient's forehead. The Ahead 300 calculates and displays raw measures for the following standard QEEG measures: Absolute and Relative Power, Asymmetry, Coherence and Fractal Dimension. These raw measures are intended to be used for post hoc analysis of EEG signals for interpretation by a qualified user.
· A negative Ahead 300 Structural Injury Classification using brain electrical activity in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, likely corresponds to those with no structural brain injury visible on head CT.
· A positive Ahead 300 Structural Injury Classification using brain electrical activity in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, likely corresponds to those with a structural brain injury visible on head CT.
· An equivocal Ahead 300 Structural Injury Classification using brain electrical activity in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, may correspond to structural brain injury visible on head CT or may indicate the need for further observation or evaluation.
· The Ahead 300 provides a measure of brain function Index, (BFI)) for the statistical evaluation of the human electroencephalogram(EEG).
· The Ahead 300 also provides clinicians with quantitative measures of cognitive performance to aid in the assessment of an individual's level of cognitive function. These measures do not interact with any other device measures, and are stand alone.
· The Ahead 300 also stores and displays electronic versions of standardized clinical assessment tools that should be used in accordance with the assessment tools' general instructions. These tools do not interact with any other device measures, and are stand alone.
Product codes
PIW, PKQ, OLU
Device Description
The Ahead 300 is a portable, non-invasive, non-radiation emitting, point of care device intended to provide results and measures to support clinical assessments and aid in the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI).
The Ahead 300 is a product of the continual technological evolution of the BrainScope Ahead 200 device. The device platform is essentially identical, and the core capability of the Ahead 300 remains the same as the Ahead 200. Both devices provide an algorithm-based structural injury classification of head injured patients using EEG features. The Ahead 300's accuracy is improved over the Ahead 200. The Ahead 300 also incorporates functions performed by additional legally marketed predicate devices, including an overall assessment of functional brain injury utilizing EEG, and two well-accepted cognitive performance tests.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Forehead
Indicated Patient Age Range
18-85 years
Intended User / Care Setting
Clinicians, medical professionals and practitioners. Point of care.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
The target population of the B-AHEAD III validation trial was aligned with that of the B-AHEAD II validation trial for the predicate device Ahead 200, and consisted of 720 adults; 60.7% males, mean age of 43.12 years, mean GCS of 14.97 and an average time since injury of 13.9 hours.
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Clinical Performance Data:
The target population of the B-AHEAD III validation trial was aligned with that of the B-AHEAD II validation trial for the predicate device Ahead 200, and consisted of 720 adults; 60.7% males, mean age of 43.12 years, mean GCS of 14.97 and an average time since injury of 13.9 hours.
The co-primary endpoints, as defined by sensitivity and specificity of the study device classification distinguishing CT+ from CT-, successfully exceeded the performance goals, and demonstrated significantly improved performance over Ahead 200. A high negative predictive value (NPV), and repeatability and reproducibility of the device result were also successfully demonstrated.
The secondary endpoints reflect the evolution of the Ahead system, providing additional quantitative information about brain function using the EEG Brain Function Index which scales with severity of functional impairment, and reducing the risk of false negatives through the addition of the Equivocal Zone for classification of structural TBI. The Ahead 300 validation trial achieved secondary endpoints related to these two functionalities.
The Ahead 300 clinical validation trial successfully achieved its target performance, and demonstrating enhanced performance compared to the Ahead 200.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV).
Predicate Device(s)
BrainScope Ahead 200 (K143643), ANAM Test System: Military Battery (K150154), Neurometric Analysis System (K974748)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 882.1450 Brain injury adjunctive interpretive electroencephalograph assessment aid.
(a)
Identification. A brain injury adjunctive interpretive electroencephalograph assessment aid is a prescription device that uses a patient's electroencephalograph (EEG) to provide an interpretation of the structural condition of the patient's brain in the setting of trauma. A brain injury adjunctive interpretive EEG assessment aid is for use as an adjunct to standard clinical practice only as an assessment aid for a medical condition for which there exists other valid methods of diagnosis.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The technical parameters of the device, hardware and software, must be fully characterized and include the following information:
(i) Hardware specifications must be provided. Appropriate verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(ii) Software, including any proprietary algorithm(s) used by the device to arrive at its interpretation of the patient's condition, must be described in detail in the software requirements specification (SRS) and software design specification (SDS). Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(2) The device parts that contact the patient must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(3) The device must be designed and tested for electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), thermal, and mechanical safety.
(4) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate the accuracy, precision-repeatability and reproducibility, of determining the EEG-based interpretation, including any specified equivocal zones (cutoffs).
(5) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate the ability of the device to function as an assessment aid for the medical condition for which the device is indicated. Performance measures must demonstrate device performance characteristics per the intended use in the intended use environment. Performance measurements must include sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with respect to the study prevalence per the device intended use.
(6) The device design must include safeguards to ensure appropriate clinical interpretation of the device output (
e.g., use in appropriate patient population, or for appropriate clinical decision).(7) The labeling and training information must include:
(i) A warning that the device is not to be used as a stand-alone diagnostic.
(ii) A detailed summary of the clinical performance testing, including any adverse events and complications.
(iii) The intended use population and the intended use environment.
(iv) Any instructions technicians should convey to patients regarding the collection of EEG data.
(v) Information allowing clinicians to gauge clinical risk associated with integrating the EEG interpretive assessment aid into their diagnostic pathway.
(vi) Information allowing clinicians to understand how to integrate the device output into their diagnostic pathway when the device is unable to provide a classification or final result.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo is a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, with flowing lines beneath them.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
September 22, 2016
Brainscope Company Inc Michael Singer, PhD CEO 4350 East West Highway Suite 1050 Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Re: K161068
Trade/Device Name: Ahead 300 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1450 Regulation Name: Brain Injury Adjunctive Interpretive Electroencephalograph Assessment Aid Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PIW, PKQ, OLU Dated: August 24, 2016 Received: August 24, 2016
Dear Dr. Singer:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply
1
with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Michael J. Hoffmann -A
Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS for Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K161068
Device Name Ahead® 300
Indications for Use (Describe)
· The Ahead 300 is indicated for use as an adjunct to standard clinical practice to aid in the evaluation of patients who are being considered for a head CT, who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, present with a Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) of 13-15, and are between the ages of 18-85 years. The Ahead 300 should not be used as a substitute for a CT scan.
· The Ahead 300 device is intended to record, measure, and display brain electrical activity utilizing the calculation of standard quantitative EEG (QEEG) parameters from frontal locations on a patient's forehead. The Ahead 300 calculates and displays raw measures for the following standard QEEG measures: Absolute and Relative Power, Asymmetry, Coherence and Fractal Dimension. These raw measures are intended to be used for post hoc analysis of EEG signals for interpretation by a qualified user.
· A negative Ahead 300 Structural Injury Classification using brain electrical activity in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, likely corresponds to those with no structural brain injury visible on head CT.
· A positive Ahead 300 Structural Injury Classification using brain electrical activity in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, likely corresponds to those with a structural brain injury visible on head CT.
· An equivocal Ahead 300 Structural Injury Classification using brain electrical activity in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, may correspond to structural brain injury visible on head CT or may indicate the need for further observation or evaluation.
· The Ahead 300 provides a measure of brain function Index, (BFI)) for the statistical evaluation of the human electroencephalogram(EEG).
· The Ahead 300 also provides clinicians with quantitative measures of cognitive performance to aid in the assessment of an individual's level of cognitive function. These measures do not interact with any other device measures, and are stand alone.
· The Ahead 300 also stores and displays electronic versions of standardized clinical assessment tools that should be used in accordance with the assessment tools' general instructions. These tools do not interact with any other device measures, and are stand alone.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image is a logo for BrainScope. The logo is in blue and features the word "BrainScope" in a bold, sans-serif font. The "C" in "Scope" is stylized with a waveform graphic. There are two horizontal lines underneath the word "BrainScope", and a registered trademark symbol is in the upper right corner of the logo.
4350 East-West Highway.Suite 1050.Bethesda.Maryland.20814
510(k) SUMMARY1
| Submitter: | BrainScope® Company, Inc.
4350 East West Highway Suite #1050
Bethesda, MD 20814
Phone: (240) 752-7680
Fax: (240) 752-7679
www.brainscope.com |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact: | Michael E. Singer, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
BrainScope Company, Inc.
Phone: (240) 752-7677
Fax: (240) 752-7679
Email: michael.singer@brainscope.com |
| Date Prepared: | September 20, 2016 |
| Device Proprietary Name: | Ahead® 300 |
| Device Common Name: | Brain Injury Adjunctive Interpretive
Electroencephalograph Assessment Aid |
| Device Classification Name: | Brain Injury Adjunctive Interpretive
Electroencephalograph Assessment Aid |
| Classification Regulation: | 21 CFR § 882.1450 |
| Panel: | Neurology |
| Product Codes: | PIW, PKQ, OLU |
| Predicate Devices: | BrainScope Ahead 200 (K143643)
ANAM Test System: Military Battery (K150154)
Neurometric Analysis System (K974748) |
1 Prepared in accordance with 21 CFR § 807.87(h) and 21 CFR § 807.92(c).
4
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for BrainScope. The logo is in blue and features the word "BrainScope" in a stylized font. The "W" in scope is replaced with a brainwave symbol. There is a horizontal line above the word "BrainScope" and a registered trademark symbol to the right of the word.
Device Description:
The Ahead 300 is a portable, non-invasive, non-radiation emitting, point of care device intended to provide results and measures to support clinical assessments and aid in the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI).
The Ahead 300 is a product of the continual technological evolution of the BrainScope Ahead 200 device. The device platform is essentially identical, and the core capability of the Ahead 300 remains the same as the Ahead 200. Both devices provide an algorithmbased structural injury classification of head injured patients using EEG features. The Ahead 300's accuracy is improved over the Ahead 200. The Ahead 300 also incorporates functions performed by additional legally marketed predicate devices, including an overall assessment of functional brain injury utilizing EEG, and two wellaccepted cognitive performance tests.
Indications for Use:2
The Ahead 300's Indications for Use reflect the improved performance of the Ahead 300 as compared to the primary predicate, the Ahead 200. The Indications for Use also provide additional information to medical professionals and practitioners upon which they can make more informed decisions about the clinical diagnosis of patients that have sustained a closed head injury, by incorporating relevant portions of the Indications for Use associated with each leqally marketed secondary predicate, thereby improving the overall benefit/risk ratio compared to the predicate devices. As such, the Ahead 300 and the predicate devices are not identical, but the combined set of Indications for Use support the Intended Use of the Ahead 300. The Ahead 300's Indications for Use are as follows:
- The Ahead 300 is indicated for use as an adjunct to standard clinical practice to ● aid in the evaluation of patients who are being considered for a head CT, who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, present with a Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) of 13-15, and are between the ages of 18-85 years. The Ahead 300 should not be used as a substitute for a CT scan.
- The Ahead 300 device is intended to record, measure, analyze, and display brain o electrical activity utilizing the calculation of standard quantitative EEG (QEEG) parameters from frontal locations on a patient's forehead. The Ahead 300 calculates and displays raw measures for the following standard QEEG measures: Absolute and Relative Power, Asymmetry, Coherence and Fractal Dimension. These raw measures are intended to be used for post hoc analysis of EEG signals for interpretation by a qualified user.
2 The Ahead 300 is a combination device encompassing indications for use for 3 predicates devices. The Indications for Use statement for the Ahead 300 is a composite of the indications associated with the predicates. The differences do not alter the intended use of the device nor do they affectiveness of the device relative to the predicates. The subject and predicate devices have the same overall intended use.
5
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for BrainScope. The logo is in blue and features the word "BrainScope" in a stylized font. There are two horizontal lines above and below the word. The letter "O" in "Scope" is replaced with a brainwave graphic.
- A negative Ahead 300 Structural Injury Classification using brain electrical activity in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, likely corresponds to those with no structural brain injury visible on head CT.
- A positive Ahead 300 Structural Injury Classification using brain electrical activity ● in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, likely corresponds to those with a structural brain injury visible on head CT.
- . An equivocal Ahead 300 Structural Injury Classification using brain electrical activity in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 72 hours, may correspond to structural brain injury visible on head CT or may indicate the need for further observation or evaluation.
- The Ahead 300 provides a measure of brain function (EEG Brain Function Index. . (BFI)) for the statistical evaluation of the human electroencephalogram (EEG).
- o The Ahead 300 also provides clinicians with quantitative measures of cognitive performance to aid in the assessment of an individual's level of cognitive function. These measures do not interact with any other device measures, and are stand alone.
- The Ahead 300 also stores and displays electronic versions of standardized ● clinical assessment tools that should be used in accordance with the assessment tools' general instructions. These tools do not interact with any other device measures, and are stand alone.
6
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for BrainScope. The logo is in blue and features the word "BRAINSCOPE" in a bold, sans-serif font. There are two horizontal lines above and below the word. The "W" in the middle of the word is replaced by a brainwave symbol.
Table 1: Indications for Use Comparison to Predicate devices | |
---|---|
| Proposed Device:
Ahead 300 | Primary
Predicate:
Ahead 200 | Secondary
Predicate:
ANAM Test
System -
Military Battery | Secondary
Predicate:
Neurometric
Analysis System | Comments |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| The Ahead 300 is
indicated for use as
an adjunct to
standard clinical
practice to aid in
the evaluation of
patients who are
being considered
for a head CT,
sustained a closed
head injury within
72 hours, present
with a Glasgow
Coma Scale score
(GCS) of 13-15,
and are between
the ages of 18-85
years. The Ahead
300 should not be
used as a
substitute for a CT
scan. | The Ahead 200,
consisting of two
models, i.e., the
Ahead M-200
and the Ahead
CV-200, is
indicated for use
as an adjunct to
standard clinical
practice to aid in
the evaluation of
patients who are
being considered
for a head CT,
but should not be
used as a
substitute for a
CT scan. This
device is to be
used for this
purpose in
patients who
sustained a
closed head
injury within 24
hours, clinically
present as a mild
traumatic brain
injury with a
Glasgow Coma
Scale score
(GCS) of 13-15,
and are between
the ages of 18-
80 years. | N/A | N/A | Equivalent to primary
predicate, with
modifications
reflecting the Ahead
300 clinical trial
results, including:
· an expanded injury
time window (72
hours versus 24
hours for the Ahead
200),
· an expanded patient
age range (18-85
years versus 18-80
years for the Ahead
200). |
| The Ahead 300
device is intended
to record, measure,
analyze, and
display brain
electrical activity
utilizing the
calculation of
standard
quantitative EEG | The Ahead 200
device is
intended to
record, measure,
analyze, and
display brain
electrical activity
utilizing the
calculation of
standard | N/A | N/A | Same as primary
predicate. |
| Proposed Device:
Ahead 300 | Primary
Predicate:
Ahead 200 | Secondary
Predicate:
ANAM Test
System –
Military Battery | Secondary
Predicate:
Neurometric
Analysis System | Comments |
| (QEEG)
parameters from
frontal locations on
a patient's
forehead. The
Ahead 300
calculates and
displays raw
measures for the
following standard
QEEG measures:
Absolute and
Relative Power,
Asymmetry,
Coherence and
Fractal Dimension.
These raw
measures are
intended to be
used for post hoc
analysis of EEG
signals for
interpretation by a
qualified user. | quantitative EEG
(QEEG)
parameters from
frontal locations
on a patient's
forehead. The
Ahead 200
calculates and
displays raw
measures for the
following
standard QEEG
measures:
Absolute and
Relative Power,
Asymmetry,
Coherence and
Fractal
Dimension.
These raw
measures are
intended to be
used for post hoc
analysis of EEG
signals for
interpretation by
a qualified user. | N/A | N/A | |
| A negative Ahead
300 Structural
Injury Classification
using brain
electrical activity in
patients who
sustained a closed
head injury within
72 hours, likely
corresponds to
those with no
structural brain
injury visible on
head CT. | A negative
BrainScope
Classification
may correspond
to brain electrical
activity
consistent with
no structural
brain injury
visible on head
CT in patients
presenting as a
mild traumatic
brain injury. | N/A | N/A | Equivalent to primary
predicate, with
proposed changes in
the Ahead 300
language reflecting
the significantly
improved accuracy
demonstrated by the
Ahead 300 trial
results. |
| A positive Ahead
300 Structural
Injury Classification
using brain | A positive
BrainScope
Classification
corresponds to | N/A | N/A | Equivalent to primary
predicate, with
proposed changes in
the Ahead 300 |
| Proposed Device:
Ahead 300 | Primary
Predicate:
Ahead 200 | Secondary
Predicate:
ANAM Test
System –
Military Battery | Secondary
Predicate:
Neurometric
Analysis System | Comments |
| electrical activity in
patients who
sustained a closed
head injury within
72 hours, likely
corresponds to
those with a
structural brain
injury visible on
head CT. | brain electrical
activity that may
be present in
both patients
with or without a
structural brain
injury visible on
head CT. A
positive
BrainScope
Classification
does not
establish the
presence of a
structural brain
injury visible on
head CT. | | | language reflecting
the improved
accuracy
demonstrated by the
Ahead 300.
In addition, the
statement regarding
false positives in the
IFU of the predicate
is now expanded and
moved to the Safety
Summary section of
the User Manual. |
| An equivocal
Ahead 300
Structural Injury
Classification using
brain electrical
activity in patients
who sustained a
closed head injury
within 72 hours,
may correspond to
structural brain
injury visible on
head CT or may
indicate the need
for further
observation or
evaluation. | N/A | N/A | N/A | The Ahead 200 has
no equivocal zone.
This zone has been
added to provide
additional clinical
information to the
clinician for use in the
diagnostic process,
providing information
about patients who
are close to the
binary threshold for
classification. |
| The Ahead 300
provides a
measure of brain
function (EEG
Brain Function
Index, (BFI)) for the
statistical
evaluation of the
human
electroencephalogram (EEG). | N/A | N/A | The Neurometric
Analysis system
is to be used by
qualified medical
professionals for
the post-hoc
statistical
evaluation of the
human
electroencephalogram (EEG). | The Ahead 300 and
NAS both use
multivariate
composite features
as a measure of
abnormality of overall
brain function relative
to age expected
normal values, and
the functionality is
consistent with the
intended use of |
| Proposed Device:
Ahead 300 | Primary
Predicate:
Ahead 200 | Secondary
Predicate:
ANAM Test
System -
Military Battery | Secondary
Predicate:
Neurometric
Analysis System | Comments |
| | | | | analyzing a patient's
electroencephalograp
h (EEG) to provide
an interpretation of
the patient's
neuropsychiatric
condition, as well as
to record, measure,
and display brain
electrical activity.
Removal of "post-
hoc" analysis reflects
the advances in
technology allowing
for real-time analysis
on the device, but
does not change
functionality. |
| The Ahead 300
also provides
clinicians with
quantitative
measures of
cognitive
performance to aid
in the assessment
of an individual's
level of cognitive
functioning. These
measures do not
interact with any
other device
measures, and are
stand alone. | N/A | The ANAM
Test System:
Military
Battery
provides
clinicians with
objective
measurement
s of cognitive
performance
in military
populations
ages 18 to 65
years, to aid
in the
assessment
of an
individual's
level of
cognitive
functioning.
The ANAM
Test System
should only
be used as an
adjunctive
tool for | N/A | Equivalent to
secondary predicate. |
| Proposed Device:
Ahead 300 | Primary
Predicate:
Ahead 200 | Secondary
Predicate:
ANAM Test
System –
Military Battery | Secondary
Predicate:
Neurometric
Analysis System | Comments |
| | | evaluating
cognitive
function. | | |
| The Ahead 300
also stores and
displays electronic
versions of
standardized
clinical assessment
tools that should be
used in accordance
with the
assessment tools'
general
instructions. These
tools do not interact
with any other
device measures,
and are stand
alone. | The Ahead M-
200 model
additionally
stores and
displays an
electronic
version of the
Military Acute
Concussion
Evaluation
(MACE)
cognitive
assessment and
user-entered
responses to the
MACE questions.
There is no
interaction
between EEG-
related
functionality,
including
analyzing and
displaying brain
electrical activity,
and the function
of storing and
displaying MACE
information. | N/A | N/A | Equivalent to primary
predicate. IFU
language is
generalized to reflect
the fact that the
Ahead 300 stores
and displays multiple
assessment tools as
part of its library
function. Users will
know the full
capability of the
Ahead 300 from the
User Manual. |
| Topic / Area | Proposed Device:
Ahead 300 | Primary
Predicate:
Ahead 200 | Secondary
Predicate:
ANAM Test System:
Military Battery | Secondary
Predicate:
Neurometric
Analysis
System |
| Platform | Trimble T41 mobile
device, Android OS | Trimble T41 mobile
device, Android OS | PC: Dell Latitude
E6440 Laptop
Computer, two button
USB connected
mouse, and Windows
7 Operating System | Stand-alone
post hoc
analysis
software that
may be run on
IBM-compatible
computer
systems. |
| Processed
EEG
Bandwidth | 1kHz sampled data
with DC to 300Hz
bandwidth and
100Hz sampled
data with 0.67Hz to
43Hz bandwidth | 1kHz sampled data
with DC to 300Hz
bandwidth and
100Hz sampled
data with 0.3Hz to
43Hz bandwidth | N/A | N/A |
| Common
Mode
Rejection
Ratio (CMRR) |