(218 days)
Not Found
No
The document describes a physical implant device and does not mention any software, algorithms, or AI/ML capabilities.
Yes
The device is indicated for use in treating degenerative disc disease and facilitating intervertebral body fusion, which are therapeutic interventions.
No
Explanation: The Amendia Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices are implants used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion. They are used for treatment and provide structural stability, not for diagnosing a condition. The diagnostic aspect is related to confirming degenerative disc disease (DDD) using patient history and radiographic studies, which are external to the device's function.
No
The device description explicitly states it consists of multiple components fabricated from Titanium alloy or PEEK with tantalum x-ray markers, which are physical materials, not software.
Based on the provided text, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In vitro diagnostics are tests performed on samples taken from the human body, such as blood, urine, or tissue, to detect diseases, conditions, or infections.
- Device Description: The Amendia Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices are described as implants made of titanium or PEEK, designed to be surgically inserted into the spine to facilitate fusion.
- Intended Use: The intended use is to provide structural stability and maintain disc space distraction in skeletally mature adults requiring intervertebral body fusion. This is a surgical intervention, not a diagnostic test performed on a sample.
- Lack of Diagnostic Activity: The text does not mention any analysis of biological samples or diagnostic testing. The device's function is mechanical support and facilitating bone fusion.
Therefore, the Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices are medical devices used for surgical treatment, not in vitro diagnostics.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Amendia Cervical Interbody Fusion Devices are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one level or two contiguous levels. DDD is defines as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The Amendia Cervical Interbody Fusion Devices are used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the C3 to C7 disc levels using autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment with an intervertebral cage.
The Amendia Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices are indicated for intervertebral body spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radios. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level. Amendia Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices are to be used with autograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
MAX, ODP
Device Description
The Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices consist of multiple components comprised of sterile and/or non-sterile, single-use implants fabricated from Titanium alloy (Ti6AI4V ELI, ASTM F136) or Invibio PEEK-Optima® LT1 or Solvay Advanced Polymers Zeniva™ ZA-500 PEEK (ASTM F2026) with tantalum (ASTM F560) x-ray markers. The Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices are used to provide structural stability and maintain disc space distraction in skeletally mature adults requiring intervertebral body fusion. They are designed to be used in conjunction with supplemental spinal fixation instrumentation.
The Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices are comprised of implants designed to treat the cervical and lumbar spine. The implants are available in a range of sizes and shapes to accommodate variations in surqical approach and patient anatomy. Each cage has a hollow center to allow placement of autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. Ridges on the superior and inferior surfaces of the device help to grip the endplates and prevent expulsion. The surface of the ridges on the titanium implants are roughened.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
cervical spine, C3 to C7 disc levels, Lumbar, L2-S1
Indicated Patient Age Range
skeletally mature patients, skeletally mature adults
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
The substantial equivalence of the Amendia Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices to the predicate is shown by similarity in intended use, indications for use, materials, performance and fundamental scientific technology.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.
(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other, creating a sense of depth and unity.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
November 8, 2016
Amendia, Inc. Chelsea Proffitt Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1755 West Oak Parkway Marietta, Georgia 30062
Re: K160924
Trade/Device Name: Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX, ODP Dated: October 12, 2016 Received: October 13, 2016
Dear Chelsea Proffitt:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices. good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
1
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known)
K160924
Device Name Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Amendia Cervical Interbody Fusion Devices are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one level or two contiguous levels. DDD is defines as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The Amendia Cervical Interbody Fusion Devices are used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the C3 to C7 disc levels using autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment with an intervertebral cage.
The Amendia Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices are indicated for intervertebral body spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radios. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level. Amendia Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices are to be used with autograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|---|---|
| ---------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
510(k) Summary
Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices
| Submitter: | Amendia, Inc.
1755 W. Oak Parkway
Marietta, GA 30062 |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Chelsea Proffitt
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
770-575-5181 (W), 877-420-1213 (F)
cproffitt@amendia.com (e-mail) |
| Date Prepared: | November 4, 2016 |
| Trade Name: | Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices |
| Common Name: | Intervertebral body fusion device |
| Device Product Code
and Classification: | MAX, 888.3080, Class II, Intervertebral Fusion
Device with Bone Graft, Lumbar |
| | ODP, 888.3080, Class II, Intervertebral Fusion
Device with Bone Graft, Cervical |
| Predicate Device: | Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices (K151322) |
| Additional Predicate Devices: | Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices (K151310)
Talos Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices, Talos-C
Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion Device, Talos-C
(HA) Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices
(K150788) |
Device Description:
The Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices consist of multiple components comprised of sterile and/or non-sterile, single-use implants fabricated from Titanium alloy (Ti6AI4V ELI, ASTM F136) or Invibio PEEK-Optima® LT1 or Solvay Advanced Polymers Zeniva™ ZA-500 PEEK (ASTM F2026) with tantalum (ASTM F560) x-ray markers. The Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices are used to provide structural stability and maintain disc space distraction in skeletally mature adults requiring intervertebral body fusion. They are designed to be used in conjunction with supplemental spinal fixation instrumentation.
The Amendia Interbody Fusion Devices are comprised of implants designed to treat the cervical and lumbar spine. The implants are available in a range of sizes and shapes to accommodate variations in surqical approach and patient anatomy. Each cage has a hollow center to allow placement of autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. Ridges on the superior and inferior surfaces of the device help to grip the endplates and prevent expulsion. The surface of the ridges on the titanium implants are roughened.
4
Indications and Intended use:
The Amendia Cervical Interbody Fusion Devices are indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one level or two contiquous levels. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The Amendia Cervical Interbody Fusion Devices are used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the cervical spine at the C3 to C7 disc levels using autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment with an intervertebral cage.
The Amendia Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices are indicated for intervertebral body spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level. Amendia Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices are to be used with autograft and/or allograft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft and supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment with an intervertebral cage.
Summary of Technological Characteristics:
The subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices as well as other similar devices cleared by FDA for commercial distribution in the United States. The Subject Device is equivalent to the predicates in regards to technological characteristics including design, intended use, material composition, and function.
Summary of Performance Testing:
The substantial equivalence of the Amendia Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices to the predicate is shown by similarity in intended use, indications for use, materials, performance and fundamental scientific technology.
Conclusion:
Based on the comparison to predicate devices, the Subject Device has been shown to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.