(227 days)
Hologic Prodesse ProFlu+, Roche cobas Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas Liat System
No
The device description mentions a "real time curve recognition algorithm" for interpreting results, which is a standard signal processing technique and does not indicate the use of AI or ML. There are no mentions of AI, ML, or related terms like neural networks or deep learning.
No
This device is an in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection and differentiation of influenza A, influenza B, and RSV RNA, which aids in diagnosis rather than providing therapy.
Yes
The text explicitly states: "The test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis and differentiation of influenza B, and RSV in humans." and "The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas Liat System ("cobas" Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay") is a rapid, automated in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of influenza A, influenza B, and RSV RNA..."
No
The device description clearly states it is an automated in vitro diagnostic test that utilizes a single-use disposable tube containing reagents and is used with the cobas Liat System, which is a hardware system that automates sample purification, amplification, and detection. This involves significant hardware components and processes beyond just software.
Based on the provided text, this device is an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use/Indications for Use: The first sentence explicitly states it is an "automated multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for the rapid in vitro qualitative detection and discrimination of influenza A virus, influenza B virus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) RNA in nasopharyngeal swab specimens...". The phrase "in vitro" is a key indicator of an IVD. It also states the test is intended for use "as an aid in the diagnosis and differentiation of influenza B, and RSV in humans".
- Device Description: The description reiterates that it is a "rapid, automated in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of influenza A, influenza B, and RSV RNA in nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens".
- Function: The device performs sample purification, nucleic acid amplification, and detection of target sequences in biological samples (nasopharyngeal swabs). These are all typical functions of an IVD used for diagnostic purposes.
- Output: The system outputs interpreted results (e.g., "Influenza A Detected"). These results are used to aid in diagnosis.
Therefore, the cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System clearly fits the definition of an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
-
- The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System (cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV) is an automated multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for the rapid in vitro qualitative detection and discrimination of influenza A virus, influenza B virus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) RNA in nasopharyngeal swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological risk factors. The test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis and differentiation of influenza A, influenza B, and RSV in humans and is not intended to detect influenza C.
Negative results do not preclude influenza virus or RSV infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. Conversely, positive results do not rule-out bacterial infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.
- The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System (cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV) is an automated multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for the rapid in vitro qualitative detection and discrimination of influenza A virus, influenza B virus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) RNA in nasopharyngeal swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological risk factors. The test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis and differentiation of influenza A, influenza B, and RSV in humans and is not intended to detect influenza C.
Performance characteristics for influenza A were established during the 2013-2014 and the 2014-2015 influenza seasons when influenza A/H3 and A/H1N1 pandemic were the predominant influenza A viruses in circulation. When other influenza A viruses are emerging, performance characteristics may vary.
If infection with a novel influenza A virus is suspected based on current clinical and epidemiological screening criteria recommended by public health authorities, specimens should be collected with appropriate infection control precautions for novel virulent influenza viruses and sent to state or local health department for testing. Viral culture should not be attempted in these cases unless a BSL3+ facility is available to receive and culture specimens.
-
- The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Quality Control Kit contains External Controls for use with the cobas ° Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay. External Controls are run during the Add cobas "Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Tube Lot procedure. Additional External Controls should be tested in accordance with local, state, federal and/or accrediting organization requirements as applicable.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
OCC, OZE, OOI, JJX
Device Description
The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas Liat System ("cobas" Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay") is a rapid, automated in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of influenza A, influenza B, and RSV RNA in nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens eluted in viral transport media.
The assay targets a well-conserved region of the matrix gene of influenza A (Inf A target), the non-structural protein gene of influenza B (Inf B target), and the matrix gene of RSV (RSV target). An Internal Process Control (IPC) is also included. The IPC is present to control for adequate processing of the target viruses and to monitor the presence of inhibitors in the sample preparation and RT-PCR.
The assay utilizes a single-use disposable cobas® Liat Tube that holds the sample purification and PCR reagents, and hosts the sample preparation and PCR processes. The cobas Liat Tube uses a flexible tube as a sample vessel. It contains all required unit dose reagents pre-packed in tube segments, separated by peelable seals, in the order of reagent use.
The cobas "Liat System automates and integrates sample purification, nucleic acid amplification, and detection of the target sequence in biological samples. The cobas Liat System performs all assay steps from clinical sample and reports assay result automatically. During the testing process. multiple sample processing actuators of the cobas " Liat System compress the cobas" Liat Tube to selectively release reagents from tube segments, move the sample from one segment to another, and control reaction volume, temperature, and time to conduct sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, target enrichment, inhibitor removal, nucleic acid elution and real-time PCR. An embedded microprocessor controls and coordinates the actions of these sample processors to perform all required assay processes within the closed cobas Liat Tube.
Positive and negative controls are provided in the cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Quality Control Kit. The positive control comprises inactivated Influenza B and RSV virus in a dried format. The negative control comprises Universal Transport Media (UTM).
To perform the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay, an operator first collects a nasopharyngeal swab and places the swab into UTM. The operator transfers the sample into cobas " Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay tube using a transfer pipette, and scans the tube barcode to identify the test and the sample barcode to code the sample ID with the assay run on the cobas® Liat System. The cobas® Liat Tube is then inserted into the cobas® Liat System. The system performs all the test steps and outputs interpreted results (e.g. Influenza A Detected, Influenza B Not Detected, RSV Not Detected) in ~20 minutes. A report of the interpreted results can be viewed on the cobas " Liat System's LCD screen, and printed directly through a USB or network connected printer. No reagent preparation or additional steps are required other than adding the sample to the cobas Liat Tube. Because all the reagents are contained within the cobas Liat Tube and no sample or reagent needs to be removed from the tube, cross-contamination between samples is minimized.
The results are interpreted by the cobas Liat System software from measured fluorescent signals and real time curve recognition algorithm.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
nasopharyngeal swab specimens
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Hospital nurse and CLIA moderate complexity laboratory technologist. Nurses and medical assistants at emergency rooms, urgent care clinics, and outpatient clinics, including physician's offices.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
For prospective specimens, a total of 1.421 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of these, 41 specimens did not meet eligibility criteria. Additionally, 17 and 13 specimens were excluded due to invalid results from the cobas Liat and the comparator tests, respectively. As such, a total of 1,350 prospective NPS specimens were included in the performance analysis. Compared to the comparator test, the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay demonstrated positive agreement of 98.3%, 95.2% and 97.0% for Inf A, Inf B and RSV, respectively; and negative agreement of 96.0%, 99.4% and 98.7% for Inf A, Inf B, and RSV, respectively.
For retrospective specimens, a total of 300 specimens were tested at clinical sites. Of these, 5 and 3 specimens were excluded due to invalid results from the cobas "Liat and the comparator tests, respectively. As such, a total of 292 retrospective NPS specimens were included in the performance analysis. Compared to the comparator test, the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay demonstrated positive agreement of 98.7%, 99.0% and 98.8% for Inf A. Inf B and RSV, respectively; and negative agreement of 99.1%, 99.5% and 96.6% for Inf A, Inf B, and RSV, respectively.
Annotation Protocol:
The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay results were compared against that from the comparator test (FDA-cleared laboratory-based multiplexed real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) test).
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Study Type: Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity
Sample Size:
- Prospective NPS specimens: 1,350
- Retrospective NPS specimens: 292
Standalone Performance: Not explicitly stated as "standalone performance", but the reproducibility study results provide an indication of the assay's consistency.
- Influenza A Reproducibility:
- Negative: 91/91 (100.0%)
- Flu A High Negative (C5): 88/90 (97.8%)
- Flu A Low Positive (C95): 90/90 (100.0%)
- Flu A Moderate Positive (C100): 90/90 (100.0%)
- Total Agreement for Influenza A samples: 900/902 (99.8%)
- Influenza B Reproducibility:
- Negative: 91/91 (100.0%)
- Flu B High Negative (C5): 90/91 (98.9%)
- Flu B Low Positive (C95): 89/89 (100.0%)
- Flu B Moderate Positive (C100): 90/90 (100.0%)
- Total Agreement for Influenza B samples: 901/902 (99.9%)
- RSV Reproducibility:
- Negative: 91/91 (100.0%)
- RSV High Negative (C5): 90/90 (100.0%)
- RSV Low Positive (C95): 90/91 (98.9%)
- RSV Moderate Positive (C100): 90/90 (100.0%)
- Total Agreement for RSV samples: 901/902 (99.9%)
Key Results:
- Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity (Prospective NPS Specimens):
- Influenza A: Positive Agreement 98.3% (95% CI: 95.1% - 99.4%), Negative Agreement 96.0% (95% CI: 94.7% - 97.0%)
- Influenza B: Positive Agreement 95.2% (95% CI: 84.2% - 98.7%), Negative Agreement 99.4% (95% CI: 98.8% - 99.7%)
- RSV: Positive Agreement 97.0% (95% CI: 91.5% - 99.0%), Negative Agreement 98.7% (95% CI: 97.9% - 99.2%)
- Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity (Retrospective NPS Specimens):
- Influenza A: Positive Agreement 98.7% (95% CI: 93.0% - 99.8%), Negative Agreement 99.1% (95% CI: 96.7% - 99.7%)
- Influenza B: Positive Agreement 99.0% (95% CI: 94.4% - 99.8%), Negative Agreement 99.5% (95% CI: 97.1% - 99.9%)
- RSV: Positive Agreement 98.8% (95% CI: 93.6% - 99.8%), Negative Agreement 96.6% (95% CI: 93.2% - 98.4%)
- Analytical Performance (LOD):
- Influenza A strains: 2x10^-3 - 2x10^-2 TCID50/mL
- Influenza B strains: 2x10^-3 - 4x10^-3 TCID50/mL
- RSV strains: 4x10^-1 TCID50/mL
- Analytical Specificity (Reactivity): Detected all 28 Influenza A, 15 Influenza B, and 7 RSV strains at the concentrations tested.
- Analytical Specificity (Cross-reactivity): No cross-reactivity observed with human genomic DNA or 35 microorganisms tested.
- Interfering Microorganisms: No interference with detection of Influenza A, Influenza B, or RSV by human genomic DNA or 35 microorganisms tested.
- Interfering Substances: No interference from medically and/or physiologically relevant concentrations of 9 potential interferents.
- Carry-over/Cross-contamination: No carry-over or cross-contamination observed.
- Fresh vs. Frozen Samples: 100% agreement with expected results for both fresh and frozen samples, demonstrating equivalent performance.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Prospective NPS Specimens:
- Influenza A:
- Positive Agreement: 98.3% (95% CI: 95.1% - 99.4%)
- Negative Agreement: 96.0% (95% CI: 94.7% - 97.0%)
- Influenza B:
- Positive Agreement: 95.2% (95% CI: 84.2% - 98.7%)
- Negative Agreement: 99.4% (95% CI: 98.8% - 99.7%)
- RSV:
- Positive Agreement: 97.0% (95% CI: 91.5% - 99.0%)
- Negative Agreement: 98.7% (95% CI: 97.9% - 99.2%)
Retrospective NPS Specimens:
- Influenza A:
- Positive Agreement: 98.7% (95% CI: 93.0% - 99.8%)
- Negative Agreement: 99.1% (95% CI: 96.7% - 99.7%)
- Influenza B:
- Positive Agreement: 99.0% (95% CI: 94.4% - 99.8%)
- Negative Agreement: 99.5% (95% CI: 97.1% - 99.9%)
- RSV:
- Positive Agreement: 98.8% (95% CI: 93.6% - 99.8%)
- Negative Agreement: 96.6% (95% CI: 93.2% - 98.4%)
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Hologic Prodesse ProFlu+, Roche cobas Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas Liat System
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
K073029, K081030, K092500, K110968, K132129, K11387
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 866.3980 Respiratory viral panel multiplex nucleic acid assay.
(a)
Identification. A respiratory viral panel multiplex nucleic acid assay is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic device intended to simultaneously detect and identify multiple viral nucleic acids extracted from human respiratory specimens or viral culture. The detection and identification of a specific viral nucleic acid from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of respiratory infection aids in the diagnosis of respiratory viral infection when used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. The device is intended for detection and identification of a combination of the following viruses:(1) Influenza A and Influenza B;
(2) Influenza A subtype H1 and Influenza A subtype H3;
(3) Respiratory Syncytial Virus subtype A and Respiratory Syncytial Virus subtype B;
(4) Parainfluenza 1, Parainfluenza 2, and Parainfluenza 3 virus;
(5) Human Metapneumovirus;
(6) Rhinovirus; and
(7) Adenovirus.
(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls are:(1) FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Respiratory Viral Panel Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay;”
(2) For a device that detects and identifies Human Metapneumovirus, FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Testing for Human Metapneumovirus (hMPV) Using Nucleic Acid Assays;” and
(3) For a device that detects and differentiates Influenza A subtype H1 and subtype H3, FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Testing for Detection and Differentiation of Influenza A Virus Subtypes Using Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assays.” See § 866.1(e) for the availability of these guidance documents.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized graphic of three human profiles facing to the right, with flowing lines beneath them.
July 25, 2016
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
IQuum, Inc. David W. Gates, Ph.D. Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs 4300 Hacienda Drive Pleasanton, CA 94588
Re: K153544
Trade/Device Name: cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System (cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV); cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Quality Control Kit Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3980 Regulation Name: Respiratory Viral Panel Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay Regulatory Class: II Product Code: OCC, OZE, OOI, JJX Dated: May 31, 2016 Received: June 1, 2016
Dear Dr. Gates:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the
1
electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulations (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Steven R. Gitterman -S
for Uwe Scherf, M.Sc., Ph.D. Director Division of Microbiology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K153544
Device Name
- cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System (cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV); 2) cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Quality Control Kit
Indications for Use (Describe)
-
- The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System (cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV) is an automated multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for the rapid in vitro qualitative detection and discrimination of influenza A virus, influenza B virus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) RNA in nasopharyngeal swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological risk factors. The test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis and differentiation of influenza B, and RSV in humans and is not intended to detect influenza C.
Negative results do not preclude influenza virus or RSV infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. Conversely, positive results do not ruleout bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.
- The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System (cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV) is an automated multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for the rapid in vitro qualitative detection and discrimination of influenza A virus, influenza B virus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) RNA in nasopharyngeal swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological risk factors. The test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis and differentiation of influenza B, and RSV in humans and is not intended to detect influenza C.
Performance characteristics for influenza A were established during the 2013-2014 and the 2014-2015 influenza seasons when influenza A/H3 and A/H1N1 pandemic were the predominant influenza A viruses in circulation. When other influenza A viruses are emerging, performance characteristics may vary.
If infection with a novel influenza A virus is suspected based on current clinical and epidemiological screening criteria recommended by public health authorities, specimens should be collected with appropriate infection control precautions for novel virulent Influenza viruses and sent to state or local health department for testing. Viral culture should not be attempted in these cases unless a BSL 3+ facility is available to receive and culture specimens.
-
- The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Quality Control Kit contains External Controls for use with the cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay. External Controls are run during the Add cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Tube Lot procedure. Additional External Controls should be tested in accordance with local, state, federal and/or accrediting organization requirements as applicable.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
---|---|
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
3
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
4
510(K) SUMMARY
Summary Date: June 16, 2016
A. 510(k) Number: K153544
B. Purpose for Submission:
The purpose of this submission is to request 510k clearance of the cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System (cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV) and the cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Quality Control Kit.
C. Measurand:
The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System is a rapid, automated in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of Influenza B and RSV RNA from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection.
D. Type of Test:
Multiplex nucleic acid assay for the qualitative detection of Influenza A, Influenza B and RSV RNA from NPS specimens, including nucleic acid isolation and multiplex real-time RT-PCR amplification using the cobas® Liat System.
E. Applicant:
IQuum, Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Roche Molecular Systems Inc.) 700 Nickerson Road Marlborough, MA 01752 Tel: 508-229-3200 Fax: 508-970-0119
Contact name: Lingjun Chen Title: Vice President, Point-of-care Operational Development Tel: 508-229-3203 Email: lingjun.chen@roche.com
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
-
- cobas Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas Liat System (cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV)
-
- cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Quality Control Kit
5
G. Regulatory Information:
-
- Regulation section:
- 21 CFR 866.3980. Respiratory Viral Panel Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay
- Classification:
Class II
- Product code:
OCC, OZE, OOI, JJX
- Panel:
Microbiology (83)
H. Intended Use:
-
- Intended use(s):
-
- The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat System (cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV) is an automated multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for the rapid in vitro qualitative detection and discrimination of influenza A virus, influenza B virus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) RNA in nasopharyngeal swab specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological risk factors. The test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis and differentiation of influenza A, influenza B, and RSV in humans and is not intended to detect influenza C.
Negative results do not preclude influenza virus or RSV infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. Conversely, positive results do not rule-out bacterial infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.
Performance characteristics for influenza A were established during the 2013-2014 and the 2014-2015 influenza seasons when influenza A/H3 and A/H1N1 pandemic were the predominant influenza A viruses in circulation. When other influenza A viruses are emerging, performance characteristics may vary.
If infection with a novel influenza A virus is suspected based on current clinical and epidemiological screening criteria recommended by public health authorities, specimens should be collected with appropriate infection control precautions for novel virulent influenza viruses and sent to state or local health department for testing. Viral culture should not be attempted in these cases unless a BSL3+ facility is available to receive and culture specimens.
-
- The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Quality Control Kit contains External Controls for use with the cobas ° Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay. External Controls are run during the
6
Add cobas "Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Tube Lot procedure. Additional External Controls should be tested in accordance with local, state, federal and/or accrediting organization requirements as applicable.
-
- Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use
- Indication(s) for use:
-
- Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
- Special conditions for use statement(s):
-
- Special instrument requirements:
Requires the cobas® Liat System
- Special instrument requirements:
I. Device Description:
The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas Liat System ("cobas" Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay") is a rapid, automated in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of influenza A, influenza B, and RSV RNA in nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens eluted in viral transport media.
The assay targets a well-conserved region of the matrix gene of influenza A (Inf A target), the non-structural protein gene of influenza B (Inf B target), and the matrix gene of RSV (RSV target). An Internal Process Control (IPC) is also included. The IPC is present to control for adequate processing of the target viruses and to monitor the presence of inhibitors in the sample preparation and RT-PCR.
The assay utilizes a single-use disposable cobas® Liat Tube that holds the sample purification and PCR reagents, and hosts the sample preparation and PCR processes. The cobas Liat Tube uses a flexible tube as a sample vessel. It contains all required unit dose reagents pre-packed in tube segments, separated by peelable seals, in the order of reagent use.
The cobas "Liat System automates and integrates sample purification, nucleic acid amplification, and detection of the target sequence in biological samples. The cobas Liat System performs all assay steps from clinical sample and reports assay result automatically. During the testing process. multiple sample processing actuators of the cobas " Liat System compress the cobas" Liat Tube to selectively release reagents from tube segments, move the sample from one segment to another, and control reaction volume, temperature, and time to conduct sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, target enrichment, inhibitor removal, nucleic acid elution and real-time PCR. An embedded microprocessor controls and coordinates the actions of these sample processors to perform all required assay processes within the closed cobas Liat Tube.
Positive and negative controls are provided in the cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Quality Control Kit. The positive control comprises inactivated Influenza B and RSV virus in a dried format. The negative control comprises Universal Transport Media (UTM).
To perform the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay, an operator first collects a nasopharyngeal swab and places the swab into UTM. The operator transfers the sample into cobas " Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay tube using a transfer pipette, and scans the tube barcode to identify the test and the sample barcode to code the sample ID with the assay run on the
7
cobas® Liat System. The cobas® Liat Tube is then inserted into the cobas® Liat System. The system performs all the test steps and outputs interpreted results (e.g. Influenza A Detected, Influenza B Not Detected, RSV Not Detected) in ~20 minutes. A report of the interpreted results can be viewed on the cobas " Liat System's LCD screen, and printed directly through a USB or network connected printer. No reagent preparation or additional steps are required other than adding the sample to the cobas Liat Tube. Because all the reagents are contained within the cobas Liat Tube and no sample or reagent needs to be removed from the tube, crosscontamination between samples is minimized.
The results are interpreted by the cobas Liat System software from measured fluorescent signals and real time curve recognition algorithm. All possible final test results are described below.
Result Report | Interpretation | |
---|---|---|
Influenza | ||
A | Influenza A Not | |
Detected | Negative test for Influenza A | |
(no Influenza A RNA detected) | ||
Influenza A Detected | Positive test for Influenza A | |
(Influenza A RNA present) | ||
Influenza A | ||
Indeterminate. | ||
Repeat Assay. | Presence or absence of Influenza A cannot be | |
determined. Repeat assay with same sample or, if | ||
possible, new sample. | ||
Influenza B | Influenza B Not | |
Detected | ||
Influenza B Detected | Positive test for Influenza B | |
(Influenza B RNA present) | ||
Influenza B | ||
Indeterminate. | ||
Repeat Assay. | Presence or absence of Influenza B cannot be | |
determined. Repeat assay with same sample or, if | ||
possible, new sample. | ||
RSV | RSV Not Detected | |
RSV Detected | Positive test for RSV | |
(RSV RNA present) | ||
RSV Indeterminate. | ||
Repeat Assay. | Presence or absence of RSV cannot be determined. | |
Repeat assay with same sample or, if possible, new | ||
sample. | ||
Assay Invalid. Repeat Assay | ||
[Error]. Assay Aborted |
Interpretation of Results
If the test result is "Indeterminate" or "Invalid", the assay should be repeated with the same patient specimen, or if possible, with a newly collected specimens that have repeat "Indeterminate" or "Invalid" results should be sent to a laboratory for confirmatory testing.
8
If an assay is aborted due to run error, or if an assay is aborted by user, the test should be repeated with the same sample or, if possible, a new sample. Roche Service Representative should be contacted if repeat "Errors" are reported.
Dual infections of Influenza A and Influenza B are rare. If the test result is "Influenza A Detected" and "Influenza B Detected", the assay should be repeated with the same patient specimen, or if possible, with a newly collected specimens that have repeat "Influenza A Detected" and "Influenza B Detected" results should be sent to a laboratory for confirmatory testing.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
-
- Predicate device name(s):
Hologic Prodesse ProFlu+™
- Predicate device name(s):
Roche cobas Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the cobas Liat System
- Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K073029, K081030, K092500, K110968, K132129
K11387
9
3. Comparison with predicate:
Device: | Predicate: | Predicate: | |
---|---|---|---|
Item Name | cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV | cobas® Liat Influenza A/B | ProFlu+ |
Intended Use | The cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV | ||
Nucleic Acid Test for Use on the | |||
cobas® Liat System is an automated | |||
multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay | |||
for the rapid in vitro qualitative | |||
detection and discrimination of | |||
influenza A virus, influenza B virus, | |||
and respiratory syncytial virus | |||
(RSV) RNA in nasopharyngeal swab | |||
specimens from patients with signs | |||
and symptoms of respiratory | |||
infection in conjunction with clinical | |||
and epidemiological risk factors. | |||
The test is intended for use as an aid | |||
in the diagnosis and differentiation | |||
of influenza A, influenza B, and | |||
RSV in humans and is not intended | |||
to detect influenza C. | |||
Negative results do not preclude | |||
influenza virus or RSV infection and | |||
should not be used as the sole basis | |||
for treatment or other patient | |||
management decisions. Conversely, | |||
positive results do not rule-out | |||
bacterial infection or co-infection | |||
with other viruses. The agent | |||
detected may not be the definite | |||
cause of disease. | |||
Performance characteristics for | The cobas® Influenza A/B Nucleic | ||
Acid Test for Use on the cobas® Liat | |||
System is an automated multiplex | |||
real-time RT-PCR assay for the | |||
rapid in vitro qualitative detection | |||
and discrimination of influenza A | |||
virus and influenza B virus RNA in | |||
nasopharyngeal swab specimens | |||
from patients with signs and | |||
symptoms of respiratory infection in | |||
conjunction with clinical and | |||
epidemiological risk factors. The | |||
test is intended for use as an aid in | |||
the differential diagnosis of | |||
influenza A and influenza B in | |||
humans and is not intended to detect | |||
influenza C. | |||
Negative results do not preclude | |||
influenza virus infection and should | |||
not be used as the sole basis for | |||
treatment or other patient | |||
management decisions. Conversely, | |||
positive results do not rule-out | |||
bacterial infection or co-infection | |||
with other viruses. The agent | |||
detected may not be the definite | |||
cause of disease. | |||
Performance characteristics for | |||
influenza A were established when | The ProFlu+ Assay is a multiplex | ||
Real Time RT-PCR in vitro | |||
diagnostic test for the rapid and | |||
qualitative detection and | |||
discrimination of Influenza A Virus, | |||
Influenza B Virus, and Respiratory | |||
Syncytial Virus (RSV) nucleic acids | |||
isolated and purified from | |||
nasopharyngeal (NP) swab | |||
specimens obtained from | |||
symptomatic patients. This test is | |||
intended for use to aid in the | |||
differential diagnosis of Influenza A | |||
Influenza B and RSV viral infections | |||
in humans and is not intended to | |||
detect Influenza C. | |||
Negative results do not preclude | |||
Influenza or RSV virus infection and | |||
should not be used as the sole basis | |||
for treatment or other management | |||
decisions. Conversely, positive | |||
results do not rule-out bacterial | |||
infection or co-infection with other | |||
viruses. The agent detected may not | |||
be the definite cause of disease. The | |||
use of additional laboratory testing | |||
and clinical presentation must be | |||
considered in order to obtain the | |||
final diagnosis of respiratory viral | |||
Device: | Predicate: | Predicate: | |
Item Name | cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV | cobas® Liat Influenza A/B | ProFlu+ |
influenza A were established during | |||
the 2013-2014 and the 2014-2015 | |||
influenza seasons when influenza | |||
A/H3 and A/H1N1 pandemic were | |||
the predominant influenza A viruses | |||
in circulation. When other influenza | |||
A viruses are emerging, performance | |||
characteristics may vary. | |||
If infection with a novel influenza A | |||
virus is suspected based on current | |||
clinical and epidemiological | |||
screening criteria recommended by | |||
public health authorities, specimens | |||
should be collected with appropriate | |||
infection control precautions for | |||
novel virulent influenza viruses and | |||
sent to state or local health | |||
department for testing. Viral culture | |||
should not be attempted in these | |||
cases unless a BSL3+ facility is | |||
available to receive and culture | |||
specimens. | influenza A/H1 and A/H3 were the | ||
predominant influenza A viruses in | |||
circulation. When other influenza A | |||
viruses are emerging, performance | |||
characteristics may vary. | |||
If infection with a novel influenza A | |||
virus is suspected based on current | |||
clinical and epidemiological | |||
screening criteria recommended by | |||
public health authorities, specimens | |||
should be collected with appropriate | |||
infection control precautions for | |||
novel virulent influenza viruses and | |||
sent to state or local health | |||
department for testing. Viral culture | |||
should not be attempted in these | |||
cases unless a BSL3+ facility is | |||
available to receive and culture | |||
specimens. | infection. | ||
Performance characteristics for | |||
Influenza A Virus were established | |||
when Influenza A/H3 and A/H1 | |||
were the predominant Influenza A | |||
viruses in circulation (2006-2007 | |||
respiratory season). Performance | |||
characteristics for Influenza A were | |||
confirmed when Influenza A/H1, | |||
Influenza A/H3, and Influenza | |||
A/2009 H1N1 were the predominant | |||
Influenza A viruses in circulation | |||
(2008 and 2009). When other | |||
Influenza A viruses are emerging, | |||
performance characteristics may | |||
vary. | |||
If infections with a novel Influenza | |||
A virus is suspected based on current | |||
clinical and epidemiological | |||
screening criteria recommended by | |||
public health authorities, specimens | |||
should be collected with appropriate | |||
infection control precautions for | |||
novel virulent Influenza viruses and | |||
sent to state or local health | |||
department for testing. Viral culture | |||
should not be attempted in these | |||
cases unless a BSL3+ facility is | |||
available to receive and culture | |||
specimens. | |||
Item Name | Device: | ||
cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV | Predicate: | ||
cobas® Liat Influenza A/B | Predicate: | ||
ProFlu+ | |||
Regulation | 21 CFR 866.3980 | (same) | (same) |
Product Code | OCC | (same) | (same) |
Assay Target | Influenza A | ||
Influenza B | |||
RSV | Influenza A | ||
Influenza B | Influenza A | ||
Influenza B | |||
RSV | |||
Sample Type | Nasopharyngeal Swab | (same) | (same) |
Internal Control | Yes for sample preparation and RT- | ||
PCR performance using | |||
encapsulated RNA | (same) | Yes for RT-PCR performance only | |
using in vitro transcribed RNA. | |||
Extraction control is recommended | |||
but not provided. | |||
Influenza A Viral Target | Well conserved region of the matrix | ||
gene | (same) | (same) | |
Influenza B Viral Target | Well conserved region of the non- | ||
structural protein (NSP) gene | (same) | (same) | |
RSV Viral Target | Well conserved region of the matrix | ||
(M) gene | N/A | Polymerase gene | |
Extraction Method | Integrated silica-magnetic bead- | ||
based nucleic acid extraction | (same) | Silica-magnetic bead-based nucleic | |
acid extraction using Roche MagNA | |||
Pure LC System, or bioMérieux | |||
NucliSENS easyMag | |||
Assay Method | RT-PCR for detecting the presence / | ||
absence of viral RNA in clinical | |||
specimens | (same) | (same) | |
Detection Technique | Multiplex assay using different | ||
reporter dyes for each target | (same) | (same) | |
Device: | Predicate: | Predicate: | |
Item Name | cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV | cobas® Liat Influenza A/B | ProFlu+ |
Assay Result | Qualitative | (same) | (same) |
Assay | |||
Instrument | cobas® Liat System | (same) | Roche MagNA Pure LC System, or |
bioMérieux NucliSENS easyMag | |||
Cepheid SmartCycler II Real Time | |||
Instrument | |||
Laboratory equipment, e.g. pipettors, | |||
centrifuge, vortex, cold block, | |||
biosafety cabinet | |||
Self Contained | |||
System Assay | Yes, integrated PC, software, and | ||
touch-screen display | (same) | No, different instruments, and | |
external PC computers required | |||
All Assay | |||
Reagents | |||
Contained in | |||
Disposable | Yes, no manual reagent addition | ||
required | (same) | No, multiple manual reagent | |
handling and preparation steps | |||
required | |||
Sample Volume | |||
Detection | Yes, automatically checks that input | ||
sample volume exceeds lower limit | (same) | No | |
Automated | |||
Assay | Yes, sample preparation, | ||
amplification, detection, and result | |||
interpretation | (same) | No, multiple manual steps required | |
Error | |||
Diagnostic | |||
System | Yes, monitors and records system | ||
parameters for error recovery or | |||
assay abort if unrecoverable | (same) | No | |
PCR Curve | |||
Pattern | |||
Recognition | Yes, ensures abnormal PCR curves | ||
are called "Invalid" or | |||
"Indeterminate" | (same) | No | |
Item Name | Device: | ||
cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV | Predicate: | ||
cobas® Liat Influenza A/B | Predicate: | ||
ProFlu+ | |||
Automated | |||
Result | |||
Interpretation | Yes, results reported as "Detected" | ||
or "Not Detected" for each virus | (same) | No, manual result interpretation | |
User | Hospital nurse and CLIA moderate | ||
complexity laboratory technologist. | |||
Nurses and medical assistants at | |||
emergency rooms, urgent care | |||
clinics, and outpatient clinics, | |||
including physician's offices. | (same) | High complexity laboratory | |
technologist | |||
Test | |||
Availability | Random access, on-demand test | (same) | Batch processing |
Time-to-result | ~20 minutes | (same) | ≥4 hours |
10
11
12
13
14
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff – Establishing the Performance Characteristics of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices for the Detection or Detection and Differentiation of Influenza Viruses. Document issued on July 15, 2011. Docket number FDA-2008-D-0095.
L. Test Principle:
The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay uses established nucleic acid test chemistry and assay protocol for viral RNA detection. The sample preparation methodology is based on chaotropic agent-based lysis and magnetic particle based nucleic acid purification. First, the NPS sample is diluted and mixed with an internal process control (IPC) comprising an encapsulated RNA. Chaotropic and proteolytic reagent then disrupts the three dimensional structure in macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids in the sample, and denatures them. Second, nucleic acids are isolated from lysates through binding to the surface of silica magnetic beads in the presence of a chaotropic salt, which removes water from hydrated molecules in solution. Third, the beads are separated from the lysates using a magnetic field, and the lysate removed. Fourth, the beads with captured nucleic acids are washed to remove possible inhibitors in the sample. Finally, the captured nucleic acids are eluted under low-salt conditions into a small volume of elution buffer.
Target amplification and detection uses TaqMan-probe based real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The Inf A primer and probe set is designed to specifically detect the matrix RNA from Influenza A virus. The Inf B primer and probe set is designed to specifically detect the non-structural protein (NSP) RNA from Influenza B viruses. The RSV primer and probe set is designed to specifically detect the matrix RNA from RSV. An IPC primer and probe set is also included to amplify the target region of the encapsulated RNA internal control.
Eluted viral RNA is first transcribed into cDNA using reverse transcriptase. This cDNA then undergoes a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) where the reaction mixture is repeatedly heated to denature the nucleic acid, and cooled to allow annealing of primers and extension of annealed primers by DNA polymerase to logarithmically amplify the specific region of the cDNA. Duallabeled fluorogenic hydrolysis (TaqMan) probes anneal to the specific target sequences located between the binding regions of forward and reverse primers. During the extension phase of the PCR cycle, the 5' nuclease activity of the polymerase degrades the probes, causing the reporter dyes to separate from the quenchers, thus generating fluorescent signals. Fluorescence intensities are monitored at each PCR cycle. When the fluorescence intensities exceed pre-determined thresholds, cycle threshold (Ct) values are returned for the specific analyte corresponding to the fluorescence channel.
All these sample preparation and real-time PCR amplification processes are conducted in a closed cobas® Liat Tube in ~20 minutes.
15
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Reproducibility study assesses the total variability of the cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay across operators, study sites, testing days, cobas Liat Analyzers, and cobas "Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay Tube lots. The cobas " Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay was evaluated at 3 sites. Two (2) operators at each of the 3 sites tested a 10 member reproducibility panel in triplicate on 5 different days, for a total of ~900 runs (10 panel members × 3 replicates × 2 operators × 5 days × 3 sites). Nine (9) cobas Liat Analyzer and 3 cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay Tube lots were used. The reproducibility panel comprises a high negative (C;), a low positive (C15), and a medium positive (C100) for each of Influenza B and RSV, in addition to a negative sample. For a given virus, the expected result for the true negative and the high negative panel member is "Not Detected", while the expected result for the low positive and moderate positive panel member is "Detected". Percent agreement with expected result, mean Ct, and Ct %CV for each site are shown in the tables below.
16
Influenza A Reproducibility
Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | Agreement | ||||||||||
w/ expected | |||||||||||
result | Ct Avg | Ct %CV | Agreement | ||||||||
w/ expected | |||||||||||
result | Ct Avg | Ct %CV | Agreement | ||||||||
w/ expected | |||||||||||
result | Ct Avg | Ct %CV | Agreement w/ | ||||||||
expected result | 95% CI | ||||||||||
Negative | 30 / 30 | - | - | 31 / 31 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 91 / 91 (100.0%) | 96.0% - 100.0% |
Flu A High | |||||||||||
Negative (C5) | 29 / 30 | 37.0 | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 29 / 30 | 35.7 | - | 88 / 90 (97.8%) | 92.3% - 99.4% |
Flu A Low | |||||||||||
Positive (C95) | 30 / 30 | 32.7 | 2.9% | 30 / 30 | 32.1 | 1.6% | 30 / 30 | 32.3 | 1.6% | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
Flu A Moderate | |||||||||||
Positive (C100) | 30 / 30 | 30.4 | 1.0% | 30 / 30 | 30.0 | 1.2% | 30 / 30 | 30.1 | 0.9% | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
Flu B High | |||||||||||
Negative (C5) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 31 / 31 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 91 / 91 (100.0%) | 96.0% - 100.0% |
Flu B Low | |||||||||||
Positive (C95) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 29 / 29 | - | - | 89 / 89 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
Flu B Moderate | |||||||||||
Positive (C100) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
RSV High | |||||||||||
Negative (C5) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
RSV Low | |||||||||||
Positive (C95) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 31 / 31 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 91 / 91 (100.0%) | 96.0% - 100.0% |
RSV Moderate | |||||||||||
Positive (C100) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
Total Agreement | 299 / 300 (99.7%) | - | 303 / 303 (100.0%) | 298 / 299 (99.7%) | 900 / 902 (99.8%) | 99.2% - 99.9% |
- 1 of 30 Flu B Low Positive (C95) replicates yielded an "Assay Invalid. Repeat Assay." result, and was not repeated.
17
Influenza B Reproducibility
Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | Agreement | |||||||||||
w/ expected | ||||||||||||
result | Ct Avg | Ct %CV | Agreement | |||||||||
w/ expected | ||||||||||||
result | Ct Avg | Ct %CV | Agreement | |||||||||
w/ expected | ||||||||||||
result | Ct Avg | Ct %CV | Agreement w/ | |||||||||
expected result | 95% CI | |||||||||||
Negative | 30 / 30 | - | - | 31 / 31 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 91 / 91 (100.0%) | 96.0% - 100.0% | |
Flu A High | ||||||||||||
Negative (C5) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% | |
Flu A Low | ||||||||||||
Positive (C95) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% | |
Flu A Moderate | ||||||||||||
Positive (C100) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% | |
Flu B High | ||||||||||||
Negative (C5) | 29 / 30 | 35.1 | - | 31 / 31 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 91 (98.9%) | 94.0% - 99.8% | |
Flu B Low | ||||||||||||
Positive (C95) | 30 / 30 | 31.9 | 1.8% | 30 / 30 | 31.6 | 1.4% | 29 / 29† | 31.6 | 1.5% | 89 / 89 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% | |
Flu B Moderate | ||||||||||||
Positive (C100) | 30 / 30 | 30.8 | 1.3% | 30 / 30 | 30.4 | 1.4% | 30 / 30 | 30.5 | 1.3% | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% | |
RSV High | ||||||||||||
Negative (C5) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% | |
RSV Low | ||||||||||||
Positive (C95) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 31 / 31 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 91 / 91 (100.0%) | 96.0% - 100.0% | |
RSV Moderate | ||||||||||||
Positive (C100) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% | |
Total Agreement | 299 / 300 (99.7%) | 303 / 303 (100.0%) | 299 / 299 (100.0%) | 901 / 902 (99.9%) | 99.4% - 100.0% |
- 1 of 30 Flu B Low Positive (C95) replicates yielded an "Assay Invalid. Repeat Assay." result, and was not repeated.
18
RSV Reproducibility
Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | Agreement | ||||||||||
w/ expected | |||||||||||
result | Ct Avg | Ct %CV | Agreement | ||||||||
w/ expected | |||||||||||
result | Ct Avg | Ct %CV | Agreement | ||||||||
w/ expected | |||||||||||
result | Ct Avg | Ct %CV | Agreement w/ | ||||||||
expected result | 95% CI | ||||||||||
Negative | 30 / 30 | - | - | 31 / 31 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 91 / 91 (100.0%) | 96.0% - 100.0% |
Flu A High | |||||||||||
Negative (C5) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
Flu A Low | |||||||||||
Positive (C95) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
Flu A Moderate | |||||||||||
Positive (C100) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
Flu B High | |||||||||||
Negative (C5) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 31 / 31 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 91 / 91 (100.0%) | 96.0% - 100.0% |
Flu B Low | |||||||||||
Positive (C95) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 29 / 29† | - | - | 89 / 89 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
Flu B Moderate | |||||||||||
Positive (C100) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
RSV High | |||||||||||
Negative (C5) | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 30 / 30 | - | - | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
RSV Low | |||||||||||
Positive (C95) | 29 / 30 | 33.0 | 3.7% | 31 / 31 | 32.8 | 3.4% | 30 / 30 | 32.8 | 2.7% | 90 / 91 (98.9%) | 94.0% - 99.8% |
RSV Moderate | |||||||||||
Positive (C100) | 30 / 30 | 30.6 | 2.9% | 30 / 30 | 30.9 | 1.6% | 30 / 30 | 30.5 | 2.5% | 90 / 90 (100.0%) | 95.9% - 100.0% |
Total Agreement | 299 / 300 (99.7%) | 303 / 303 (100.0%) | 299 / 299 (100.0%) | 901 / 902 (99.9%) | 99.4% - 100.0% |
- 1 of 30 Flu B Low Positive (C95) replicates yielded an "Assay Invalid. Repeat Assay." result, and was not repeated.
19
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not Applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay has 3 controls: (1) internal process control, (2) positive control and (3) negative control.
Internal Process Control
The internal process control (IPC) comprises an encapsulated RNA that is pre-packed in each cobas " Liat Tube. When conducting an assay, it is first mixed with sample and then goes through all the test processes to monitor both the sample preparation and RT-PCR performance. The IPC RNA is detected in a separate channel by IPC specific primers and probe. If IPC Ct does not meet the acceptance criteria and Inf A, Inf B, and RSV are not detected, the assay run is called "Invalid" to avoid false negative results due to excessive sample inhibition or system operation outside the normal range.
Positive Control
Positive control is provided in the cobas® Influenza A/B & RSV Assay Quality Control Kit. The positive control comprises a pooled sample of inactivated Influenza A, Influenza B and RSV in a dried format. The positive control is designed to be detected at near LOD Ct using the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay.
To use the positive control, an operator transfers a unit dose of UTM from the Dilution UTM tube into the Positive Control tube using an included transfer pipette to dissolve and mix the dried positive control. The entire mixture is then transfer into the cobas Ciat Tube, and the cobas Liat Tube is run on a cobas Liat System according to the Instructions for Use.
The positive control is required to be run during the "Add Liat Tube Lot" process, in which the cobas Liat tube lot and end user site procedures are checked at the end user site. Additional positive control runs may be performed by the end-user to confirm the performance of a cobas Liat System and a cobas Liat Tube lot through detection of Influenza A, Influenza B and RSV targets, or as required by the end user's quality control standards.
Negative Control
Negative control is provided in the cobas Influenza A/B & RSV Assay Quality Control Kit. The negative control comprises UTM. The solution is provided in unit dose quantity and labeled as Dilution UTM.
To use the negative control, an operator transfers the entire contents of the Dilution UTM tube into the cobas Liat Tube using a transfer pipette and runs the assay following the Instructions for Use.
The negative control is required to be run during the "Add Liat Tube Lot" process, in which potential contamination and end user site procedures are checked at the end user site. Additional negative control runs may be performed by the end-user to check if there is contamination resulting in a false positive result, or as required by the end user's quality control standards.
20
d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Detection (LOD) of the cobas ) Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay was evaluated using 3 strains of Influenza A, 2 strains of Influenza B, and 2 strains of RSV. The LOD was determined by limiting dilution studies using these titered viruses were spiked into negative nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) in UTM sample matrix, and then tested using the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay. The LOD was determined as the lowest virus concentration that was detected ≥95% of the time (i.e. concentration at which at least 19 out of 20 replicates tested positive). The LOD was 2×103 - 2×102 TCID50/mL for Influenza A strains, 2×103 - 4×103 TCID50/mL for Influenza B strains, and 4×10 + TCID50/mL for RSV strains.
Virus Strain | LOD (TCID50/mL) |
---|---|
A/Brisbane/10/07 | 2.0 × 10-2 |
A/Brisbane/59/07 | 2.0 × 10-3 |
A/NY/01/2009 | 2.0 × 10-2 |
B/Florida/04/06 | 2.0 × 10-3 |
B/Malaysia/2506/04 | 4.0 × 10-3 |
RSV A | 4.0 × 10-1 |
RSV B | 4.0 × 10-1 |
21
e. Analytical specificity (reactivity):
The reactivity study evaluates the ability to detect Influenza and RSV strains representing temporal and geographical diversity. The cobas Ciat Influenza A/B & RSV assay was evaluated with 28 Influenza A, 15 Influenza B, and 7 RSV strains. Influenza A strains included 14 Influenza A/H1 strains (including 3 H1N1 pdm09 strains), 12 Influenza A/H3 strains (including 1 H3N2v strain), 1 Influenza A/H7N9 strains, and 1 Influenza A/H5N1 reassortant strain. Influenza B strains included that from both the Victoria lineage and Yamagata lineage. RSV strains included both RSV Type A and Type B strains. The cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay detected all strains at the concentrations tested.
| Virus Strain | Type / Subtype | Test Concentration | Inf A
Result | Inf B
Result | RSV
Result |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|---------------|
| A/Aichi/2/68 | Influenza A/H3N2 | $1.0×10^2$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Alice | Influenza A/H3N2 | $5.0×10^1$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Anhui/1/2013 | Influenza A/H7N9 (Eurasian
lineage) | $1.0×10^3$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Brisbane/10/07 | Influenza A/H3N2 | $2.0×10^{-2}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Brisbane/59/07 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $2.0×10^{-3}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Cambodia/X0810301/2013(
H5N1)-PR8-IDCDC-RG34B | Influenza A/H5N1 reassortant | $2.5×10^1$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Denver/1/57 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $1.0×10^2$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/FM/1/47 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $1.0×10^2$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/H3/Perth/16/09 | Influenza A/H3N2 | $2.5×10^{-1}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Hong Kong/8/68 | Influenza A/H3N2 | $1.0×10^2$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Indiana/8/2011 | Influenza A/H3N2v | $5.0×10^1$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Mal/302/54 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $4.0×10^2$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/MRC2 | Influenza A/H3 | $1.0×10^2$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/New Caledonia/20/99 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $1.0×10^2$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/New Jersey/8/76 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $1.0×10^1$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/NY/01/2009 | Influenza A/H1N1 pdm09 | $2.0×10^{-2}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/NY/02/2009 | Influenza A/H1N1 pdm09 | $2.5×10^{-2}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/NY/03/2009 | Influenza A/H1N1 pdm09 | $2.0×10^1$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Port Chalmers/1/73 | Influenza A/H3N2 | $1.0×10^2$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/PR/8/34 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $5.0×10^0$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Solomon Island/3/2006 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $5.0×10^{-2}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Swine/1976/31 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $1.0×10^1$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| Virus Strain | Type / Subtype | Test Concentration | Inf A
Result | Inf B
Result | RSV
Result |
| A/Swine/Iowa/15/30 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $1.0\times10^{2}$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Texas/50/2012 | Influenza A/H3N2 | $1.0\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Victoria/3/75 | Influenza A/H3N2 | $1.0\times10^{2}$ CEID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Victoria/361/2011 | Influenza A/H3N2 | $2.0\times10^{-2}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Weiss/43 | Influenza A/H1N1 | $1.0\times10^{3}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| A/Wisconsin/67/05 | Influenza A/H3N2 | $5.0\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | + | - | - |
| B/Allen/45 | Influenza B | $5.0\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Brisbane/60/2008 | Influenza B (Victoria lineage) | $1.0\times10^{-2}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Florida/04/06 | Influenza B (Yamagata
lineage) | $2.0\times10^{-3}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Florida/07/04 | Influenza B (Yamagata
lineage) | $5.0\times10^{-2}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/GL/1739/54 | Influenza B | $2.0\times10^{0}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/HongKong/5/72 | Influenza B | $2.5\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Lee/40 | Influenza B | $2.5\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Malaysia/2506/04 | Influenza B (Victoria lineage) | $4.0\times10^{-3}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Maryland/1/59 | Influenza B | $5.0\times10^{-2}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Mass/3/66 | Influenza B | $1.0\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Massachusetts/2/2012 | Influenza B (Yamagata
lineage) | $5.0\times10^{-3}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Nevada/03/2011 | Influenza B (Victoria lineage) | $2.5\times10^{-1}$ CEID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Taiwan/2/62 | Influenza B | $1.0\times10^{0}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Texas/6/2011 | Influenza B (Yamagata
lineage) | $1.0\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| B/Wisconsin/1/2010 | Influenza B (Yamagata
lineage) | $5.0\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | - | + | - |
| RSV A 2006 isolate | RSV A | $4.0\times10^{-1}$ TCID50/mL | - | - | + |
| RSV A Long | RSV A | $1.0\times10^{2}$ TCID50/mL | - | - | + |
| RSV A2 | RSV A | $1.0\times10^{0}$ TCID50/mL | - | - | + |
| RSV B 9320 | RSV B | $1.0\times10^{0}$ TCID50/mL | - | - | + |
| RSV B Ch93(18)-18 | RSV B | $4.0\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | - | - | + |
| RSV B Wash/18537 | RSV B | $1.0\times10^{0}$ TCID50/mL | - | - | + |
| RSV B WV/14617/85 | RSV B | $1.0\times10^{1}$ TCID50/mL | - | - | + |
22
23
f. Analytical specificity (Cross-reactivity):
Cross reactivity study evaluates potential cross-reactivity with non-influenza and non-RSV microorganisms that may be present in nasopharyngeal swab samples. The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay was evaluated against a panel comprising human genomic DNA and 35 microorganisms. Bacteria and Candida albicans were tested at ≥10° CFU/mL. Viruses were tested at ≥10 TCID50/mL, or the highest available concentration. The cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay showed no cross reactivity for the human genomic DNA or the microorganisms at the concentrations tested.
Microorganism | Test Concentration | Inf A Result | Inf B Result | RSV Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adenovirus Type 1 | $9.0\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Adenovirus Type 7 | $1.4\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Cytomegalovirus | $4.5\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Epstein Barr Virus | $2.5\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Herpes Simplex Virus | $1.4\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Human Coronavirus 229E | $8.0\times10^3$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Human Coronavirus OC43 | $8.0\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Human Enterovirus 68 | $1.0\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Human Metapneumovirus | $7.0\times10^3$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Human Parainfluenza Type 1 | $3.7\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Human Parainfluenza Type 2 | $7.5\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Human Parainfluenza Type 3 | $4.5\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Human Rhinovirus Type 1A | $8.0\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Measles | $8.0\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Mumps Virus | $8.0\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Varicella-Zoster Virus | $4.4\times10^3$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Bordetella pertussis | $2.2\times10^6$ CFU/mL | - | - | - |
Candida albicans | $4.2\times10^6$ CFU/mL | - | - | - |
Chlamydia pneumoniae | $8.0\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | - | - | - |
Corynebacterium sp | $3.6\times10^6$ CFU/mL | - | - | - |
Escherichia coli | $1.9\times10^6$ CFU/mL | - | - | - |
Haemophilus influenzae | $2.3\times10^6$ CFU/mL | - | - | - |
Lactobacillus sp | $1.9\times10^6$ CFU/mL | - | - | - |
Legionella pneumophila | $6.7\times10^6$ CFU/mL | - | - | - |
Moraxella catarrhalis | $2.5\times10^6$ CFU/mL | - | - | - |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | $2.8\times10^6$ copies/mL† | - | - | - |
Microorganism | Test Concentration | Inf A Result | Inf B Result | RSV Result |
Mycoplasma pneumoniae | $2.9\times10^6$ copies/mL† | – | – | – |
Neisseria elongate | $2.0\times10^6$ CFU/mL | – | – | – |
Neisseria meningitidis | $2.2\times10^6$ CFU/mL | – | – | – |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | $2.3\times10^6$ CFU/mL | – | – | – |
Staphylococcus aureus | $2.4\times10^6$ CFU/mL | – | – | – |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | $1.9\times10^6$ CFU/mL | – | – | – |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | $1.8\times10^6$ CFU/mL | – | – | – |
Streptococcus pyogenes | $2.5\times10^6$ CFU/mL | – | – | – |
Streptococcus salivarius | $4.3\times10^6$ CFU/mL | – | – | – |
Human genomic DNA | $1.0\times10^4$ copies/mL | – | – | – |
24
† Testing was performed with genomic DNA due to difficulties in propagation of these bacteria.
25
g. Interfering Microorganisms:
Interfering microorganism study evaluates whether non-influenza and non-RSV microorganisms that may be present in nasopharyngeal swab samples can interfere in the detection of Influenza A, Influenza B or RSV by the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay. The panel comprising human genomic DNA and 35 microorganisms tested in the cross-reactivity study was tested for potential interference. Bacteria and Candida albicans were tested at ≥10° CFU/mL, and viruses were tested at ≥10 TCIDsp/mL or the highest available concentration, in the presence of 1 Influenza A strain, 1 Influenza B strain and 1 RSV strain at 3x LOD concentration in negative NPS in UTM matrix. Results show that the presence of human genomic DNA or the microorganisms at the concentrations tested did not interfere with the detection of Influenza A, Influenza B. or RSV.
Microorganism | Test Concentration | 1 Flu A, 1 Flu B &1 RSV strain at 3x LOD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Inf A Result | Inf B Result | RSV Result | ||
Adenovirus Type 1 | $9.0\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Adenovirus Type 7 | $1.4\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Cytomegalovirus | $4.5\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Epstein Barr Virus | $2.5\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Herpes Simplex Virus | $1.4\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Human Coronavirus 229E | $8.0\times10^3$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Human Coronavirus OC43 | $8.0\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Human Enterovirus 68 | $1.0\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Human Metapneumovirus | $7.0\times10^3$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Human Parainfluenza Type 1 | $3.7\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Human Parainfluenza Type 2 | $7.5\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Human Parainfluenza Type 3 | $4.5\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Human Rhinovirus Type 1A | $8.0\times10^5$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Measles | $8.0\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Mumps Virus | $8.0\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Varicella-Zoster Virus | $4.4\times10^3$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Bordetella pertussis | $2.2\times10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Candida albicans | $4.2\times10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Chlamydia pneumoniae | $8.0\times10^4$ TCID50/mL | + | + | + |
Corynebacterium sp | $3.6\times10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Escherichia coli | $1.9\times10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Haemophilus influenzae | $2.3\times10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Lactobacillus sp | $1.9\times10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Legionella pneumophila | $6.7\times10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Moraxella catarrhalis | $2.5\times10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | $2.8\times10^6$ copies/mL | + | + | + |
26
Microorganism | Test Concentration | 1 Flu A, 1 Flu B &1 RSV strain at 3x LOD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Inf A Result | Inf B Result | RSV Result | ||
Mycoplasma pneumoniae | $2.9 \times 10^6$ copies/mL† | + | + | + |
Neisseria elongata | $2.0 \times 10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Neisseria meningitidis | $2.2 \times 10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | $2.3 \times 10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Staphylococcus aureus | $2.4 \times 10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | $1.9 \times 10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | $1.8 \times 10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Streptococcus pyogenes | $2.5 \times 10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Streptococcus salivarius | $4.3 \times 10^6$ CFU/mL | + | + | + |
Human Genomic DNA | $1.0 \times 10^4$ copies/mL | + | + | + |
† Testing was performed with genomic DNA due to difficulties in propagation of these bacteria.
27
h. Interfering substances
The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay was evaluated with potentially interfering substances that may be encountered in respiratory specimens. Medically and/or physiologically relevant concentrations of potential interferents were tested with 2 Influenza A strains, 2 Influenza B strains, and 2 RSV strains at 3x LOD. Results showed that substances at the concentrations tested did not interfere in the detection of Influenza A, Influenza B, and RSV.
Potential Interferent | Active Ingredient | Concentration |
---|---|---|
Mucin: bovine submaxillary gland, | ||
type I-S | Purified mucin protein | 5 mg/ml |
Blood | 5% (v/v) | |
Nasal spray - Afrin | Oxymetazoline | 5% (v/v) |
Nasal corticosteroids - Veramyst | Fluticasone | 5% (v/v) |
Nasal gel - Zicam | Galphimia glauca, Histaminum | |
hydrochloricum, Luffa operculata, Sulphur | 5% (v/v) | |
Throat lozenges, oral anesthetic and | ||
analgesic - Cepacol | Benzocaine, Menthol | 5 mg/ml |
Antibiotic, nasal ointment – Bactroban | Mupirocin | 5 mg/ml |
Antiviral drug – Relenza | Zanamivir | 5 mg/ml |
Antiviral drug – Tamiflu | Oseltamivir | 7.5 mg/ml |
Antimicrobial, systemic | Tobramycin | 4 µg/ml |
i. Carry-over/Cross-contamination:
A study was conducted to demonstrate that the single-use, self-contained cobas® Liat assay tube is not susceptible to carry-over contamination when alternating high positive and negative samples are tested. High positive samples comprised an influenza A virus spiked into negative nasopharyngeal swab in UTM matrix at a concentration greater than that expected in 95% or more of specimens of diseased patients in the intended use population. Negative samples comprised negative nasopharyngeal swab matrix. Twenty (20) high positive and 20 negative samples were tested on each of 2 cobas " Liat Systems (i.e. 40 high positive and 40 negative samples in total). High positive and negative samples were run alternating analyzer-to-analyzer and run-to-run. All 40 high positive samples tested were correctly reported as "Influenza A Detected". All 40 negative samples tested were correctly reported as "Influenza A Not Detected". There was no carry-over or cross contamination observed during this study.
28
Performance using Fresh vs. Frozen Samples: i.
The cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay was tested by comparing its performance using fresh and frozen specimens. One (1) influenza A, 1 influenza B, and 1 RSV strain was individually spiked into nasopharyngeal swab in UTM matrix at different viral loads, including levels near the LOD and levels reflecting the clinical range. For each strain, at least 60 samples were tested immediately while at least another 60 samples were frozen at -80°C for 7 days, thawed and then tested. Ten (10) negative samples were also tested fresh and after being frozen at -80°C for 7 days. Fresh and frozen samples demonstrated 100% agreement with the expected result, demonstrating that the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay had equivalent performance for fresh and frozen samples.
2. Comparison studies:
-
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not applicable -
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity:
The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay was evaluated at 12 CLIA waived healthcare facilities. A total of 38 untrained operators representative of intended use operators at CLIA waived sites participated in the study. Prospective nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens were collected from patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection in the US during the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 flu seasons, and were tested prospectively at the study sites. Retrospective NPS specimens were obtained from two reference laboratories and were distributed to and tested at 3 of the 12 CLIA waived intended use sites. The retrospective specimens were worked into the daily workload of those sites for testing
Each patient's specimen was tested by the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV and an FDAcleared laboratory-based multiplexed real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) test (comparator test). The cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay results were compared against that from the comparator test. A total of 1.350 prospective NPS specimens and 292 retrospective NPS specimens were included in the performance analysis.
29
For prospective specimens, a total of 1.421 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of these, 41 specimens did not meet eligibility criteria. Additionally, 17 and 13 specimens were excluded due to invalid results from the cobas Liat and the comparator tests, respectively. As such, a total of 1,350 prospective NPS specimens were included in the performance analysis. Compared to the comparator test, the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay demonstrated positive agreement of 98.3%, 95.2% and 97.0% for Inf A, Inf B and RSV, respectively; and negative agreement of 96.0%, 99.4% and 98.7% for Inf A, Inf B, and RSV, respectively.
Prospective NPS Specimens
Inf A | Comparator Test | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | Total | ||
Liat | Positive | 172 | 47a | 219 |
Negative | 3 | 1128 | 1131 | |
Total | 175 | 1175 | 1350 |
% | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|
Positive | ||
Agreement | 98.3% | (95.1% - 99.4%) |
Negative | ||
Agreement | 96.0% | (94.7% - 97.0%) |
a 41 Liat positive, comparator negative specimens were tested by PCR/sequencing. Of these, 18 were positive and 23 were negative by PCR/sequencing.
Inf B | Comparator Test | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | Total | ||
Liat | Positive | 40 | 8a | 48 |
Negative | 2 | 1300 | 1302 | |
Total | 42 | 1308 | 1350 |
% | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|
Positive | ||
Agreement | 95.2% | (84.2% - 98.7%) |
Negative | ||
Agreement | 99.4% | (98.8% - 99.7%) |
4 6 Liat positive, comparator negative specimens were tested by PCR/sequencing. Of these, 5 were positive and 1 was negative by PCR/sequencing.
RSV | Comparator Test | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | Total | ||
Liat | Positive | 96 | 16a | 112 |
Negative | 3 | 1235 | 1238 | |
Total | 99 | 1251 | 1350 |
% | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|
Positive | ||
Agreement | 97.0% | (91.5% - 99.0%) |
Negative | ||
Agreement | 98.7% | (97.9% - 99.2%) |
4 15 Liat positive, comparator negative specimens were tested by PCR/sequencing. Of these, 3 were positive and 12 were negative by PCR/sequencing.
30
For retrospective specimens, a total of 300 specimens were tested at clinical sites. Of these, 5 and 3 specimens were excluded due to invalid results from the cobas "Liat and the comparator tests, respectively. As such, a total of 292 retrospective NPS specimens were included in the performance analysis. Compared to the comparator test, the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay demonstrated positive agreement of 98.7%, 99.0% and 98.8% for Inf A. Inf B and RSV, respectively; and negative agreement of 99.1%, 99.5% and 96.6% for Inf A, Inf B, and RSV, respectively.
Retrospective NPS Specimens
Inf A | Comparator Test | % | 95% CI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | Total | Positive | ||||
Agreement | 98.7% | (93.0% - 99.8%) | |||||
Liat | Positive | 76 | 2a | 78 | Negative | ||
Agreement | 99.1% | (96.7% - 99.7%) | |||||
Negative | 1 | 213 | 214 | ||||
Total | 77 | 215 | 292 |
a 1 Liat positive, comparator negative specimen was tested by PCR/sequencing. This sample was negative by PCR/sequencing.
Inf B | Comparator Test | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | Total | ||
Liat | Positive | 97 | 1 | 98 |
Liat | Negative | 1 | 193 | 194 |
Total | 98 | 194 | 292 |
% | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|
Positive | ||
Agreement | 99.0% | (94.4% - 99.8%) |
Negative | ||
Agreement | 99.5% | (97.1% - 99.9%) |
RSV | Comparator Test | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | Total | |||
Liat | Positive | 83 | 7a | 90 | |
Negative | 1 | 201 | 202 | ||
Total | 84 | 208 | 292 |
% | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|
Positive | ||
Agreement | 98.8% | (93.6% - 99.8%) |
Negative | ||
Agreement | 96.6% | (93.2% - 98.4%) |
4 6 Liat positive, comparator negative specimens were tested by PCR/sequencing. Of these, all 6 were positive by PCR/sequencing.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
31
5. Expected values/Reference range:
In the cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay prospective clinical study, a total of 313 specimens were determined to be evaluable during the 2013-2014 influenza season from January 2014 to May 2014. The number and percentage of influenza B and RSV positive cases per specified age group, as determined by the cobas "Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay, are presented in the tables below:
Influenza A Positives by the cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay per Patient Age Group | |
---|---|
- 2013 to 2014 Influenza Season |
| Age Group | Number of
Nasopharyngeal
Swab Specimens | Number of Influenza A
Positives | Influenza A Positivity Rate |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| ≤ 5 years | 135 | 5 | 3.7% |
| 6 to 21 years | 124 | 10 | 8.1% |
| 22 to 59 years | 45 | 3 | 6.7% |
| ≥ 60 years | 9 | 1 | 11.1% |
| Total | 313 | 19 | 6.1% |
Influenza B Positives by cobas Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay per Patient Age Group -2013 to 2014 Influenza Season
| Age Group | Number of
Nasopharyngeal
Swab Specimens | Number of Influenza B
Positives | Influenza B Positivity Rate |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| ≤ 5 years | 135 | 4 | 3.0% |
| 6 to 21 years | 124 | 11 | 8.9% |
| 22 to 59 years | 45 | 5 | 11.1% |
| ≥ 60 years | 9 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 313 | 20 | 6.4% |
Table 24: RSV Positives by cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay per Patient Age Group | ||
---|---|---|
- 2013 to 2014 Influenza Season |
| Age Group | Number of
Nasopharyngeal
Swab Specimens | Number of Influenza B
Positives | Influenza B Positivity Rate |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| ≤ 5 years | 135 | 8 | 5.9% |
| 6 to 21 years | 124 | 2 | 1.6% |
| 22 to 59 years | 45 | 3 | 6.7% |
| ≥ 60 years | 9 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 313 | 13 | 4.2% |
32
A total of 1048 specimens were determined to be evaluable during the 2014-2015 influenza season from October 2014 to April 2015. The number and percentage of influenza A, influenza B and RSV positive cases per specified age group, as determined by the cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay, are presented in the tables below:
Influenza A Positives by the cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay per Patient Age Group - 2014 to 2015 Influenza Season
| Age Group | Number of
Nasopharyngeal
Swab Specimens | Number of Influenza A
Positives | Influenza A Positivity Rate |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| ≤ 5 years | 185 | 21 | 11.4% |
| 6 to 21 years | 284 | 78 | 27.5% |
| 22 to 59 years | 460 | 76 | 16.5% |
| ≥ 60 years | 119 | 29 | 24.4% |
| Total | 1048 | 204 | 19.5% |
Influenza B Positives by cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay per Patient Age Group -2014 to 2015 Influenza Season
| Age Group | Number of
Nasopharyngeal
Swab Specimens | Number of Influenza B
Positives | Influenza B Positivity Rate |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| ≤ 5 years | 185 | 1 | 0.5% |
| 6 to 21 years | 284 | 7 | 2.5% |
| 22 to 59 years | 460 | 18 | 3.9% |
| ≥ 60 years | 119 | 3 | 2.5% |
| Total | 1048 | 29 | 2.8% |
RSV Positives by cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay per Patient Age Group - 2014 to 2015 Influenza Season
| Age Group | Number of
Nasopharyngeal
Swab Specimens | Number of Influenza B
Positives | Influenza B Positivity Rate |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| ≤ 5 years | 185 | 54 | 29.2% |
| 6 to 21 years | 284 | 17 | 6.0% |
| 22 to 59 years | 460 | 23 | 5.0% |
| ≥ 60 years | 119 | 6 | 5.0% |
| Total | 1048 | 100 | 9.5% |
N. Instrument Name:
cobas® Liat System
33
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
The cobas® Liat System functions as a point-of-care platform with sample-to-answer capabilities in which all sample processing steps as well as detection are carried out using a single-use, disposable cobas® Liat Tube.
2. Software:
Applicant's Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types has been provided:
Yes_X__or No ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Specimen Identification:
A sample barcode is scanned or a sample ID entered into the cobas Liat System during the assay run process. After scanning the sample barcode, the corresponding sample is loaded directly into a cobas® Liat Tube using a transfer pipette. After the tube is capped, the tube barcodes is scanned by the cobas Liat System and the tube is inserted into the system to start the test.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Specimen sampling and handling during the assay is controlled automatically using multiple sample processing modules contained within the cobas Liat System. The sample processing modules are composed of two assemblies, a moving side assembly comprised of multiple sample processing plungers and clamps and a fixed side assembly. When performing an assay, a cobas Liat Tube is inserted into the tube slot of a cobas Liat System. The plungers and clamps selectively compress the cobas® Liat Tube segments against the fixed side assembly to release reagents from the segments, move the sample from one segment to another, and control reaction conditions.
5. Calibration:
Not required. The cobas " Liat Tube is single use and part of a closed system.
6. Quality Control:
An internal process control used in conjunction with procedural checks monitors instrument functionality, performance, fluidics, and result determination based on a pre-defined decision algorithm.
P. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and demonstrates that the cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.