(152 days)
No
The summary describes a fluid waste management and smoke evacuation system with standard mechanical and electrical components. There is no mention of AI, ML, image processing, or data analysis that would suggest the use of such technologies. The performance studies focus on safety, EMC, and mechanical function.
No.
The device is intended to collect and dispose of surgical fluid waste and collect smoke generated from electrocautery or laser devices, which are waste management functions rather than direct therapeutic treatments.
No
The device is described as a "Waste Management System" used to collect and dispose of surgical fluid waste and evacuate smoke during surgical procedures. Its functions are related to waste collection and disposal, not to diagnosing medical conditions.
No
The device description explicitly mentions hardware components such as a mobile device (Stryker Neptune 3 Rover), a docking station (Stryker Neptune 2 Docking Station), and a motorized IV pole. The performance studies also include electrical safety, EMC, and mechanical testing, which are relevant to hardware components.
Based on the provided information, the Neptune 3 Waste Management System is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic) device.
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states that the device is for collecting and disposing of surgical fluid waste and collecting smoke generated during surgical procedures. This is a function performed during a medical procedure on a patient, not on a sample taken from a patient for diagnostic purposes.
- Device Description: The description reinforces its role in managing waste fluids and smoke during surgery.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples, detecting specific analytes, or providing diagnostic information based on in vitro testing.
IVD devices are specifically designed to perform tests on samples (like blood, urine, tissue) taken from the human body to provide information for the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of diseases or conditions. The Neptune 3's function is entirely focused on managing waste generated during a procedure, not on analyzing samples for diagnostic purposes.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Neptune 3 Waste Management System is intended to be used in the operating room, pathology, surgical centers and doctor's offices to collect and dispose of surgical fluid waste as well as collect smoke generated from electrocautery or laser devices.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
JCX, FYD
Device Description
The Neptune 3 Waste Management System provides fluid waste management, fluid volume measurement and surgical smoke evacuation capabilities and is also equipped with a motorized IV pole. The Stryker Neptune 3 Rover (Model Number 0703-001-000) is a mobile device used to suction and collect waste fluids and evacuate smoke during surgical procedures. The Stryker Neptune 3 Rover collects surgical waste fluid within a closed suction system and is paired with a compatible Stryker Neptune 2 Docking Station (0702-014-000) to facilitate disposal. The Stryker Neptune 3 Rover functions together with existing Neptune 2 components as follows:
Stryker Neptune 2 Manifolds: Component providing an interface between the Rover and suction tubing along with backflow prevention. May also incorporate specimen collection capability (model dependent).
Fluid Suction High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) Filter: Component providing filtration of air drawn out of the fluid collection canister.
Smoke Evacuation Ultra Low Penetration Air (ULPA) Filter: Component providing filtration of evacuated smoke and air as it passes through the Rover. The filter also provides an interface to connect smoke evacuation accessories (1/4 inch, 3/8 inch, or 7/8 inch).
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
operating room, pathology, surgical centers and doctor's offices
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing were conducted on the Stryker Neptune 3 Rover. Testing included assessment of RF wireless performance. The device complies with the IEC 60601-1 standard for safety and the IEC 60601-1-2 standard for EMC.
Software verification and validation testing was conducted and documentation was provided as recommended by FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices." The software for this device was considered as a "major" level of concern.
Mechanical Testing:
Suction Performance: Rover fluid suction flow rate was evaluated simulating an emergent situation when clinicians might need to quickly aspirate fluids to provide surgical site visibility as well as worst case simulated use. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
ISO 10079-1 Electrically-powered suction safety: The Rover was evaluated against the minimum safety and performance requirements for medical and surgical suction equipment as defined in this international standard. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
Smoke Blower Performance: Smoke evacuation minimum and maximum flow rates were evaluated against predetermined acceptance criteria. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
IV Pole Performance: IV pole extension and retraction times were evaluated against predetermined acceptance criteria. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
Docking Performance: Evaluation of the Neptune 3 Rover compatibility with the Neptune 2 Docking Station included demonstration of waste off-load after worst-case clinical use conditions. The Neptune 3 Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
ULPA Filtration: Evaluation of the Neptune 3 Rover compatibility with the Neptune 2 ULPA filter included evaluation of UPLA rating in accordance with IEST-RP-CC007 under worst case flow and vacuum conditions. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
Human Factors Evaluation: Human factors analysis and usability testing was performed in support of the Substantial Equivalence determination and in accordance with FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Optimize Medical Device Design" and IEC 62366-1 "Medical Devices - Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices."
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 878.4780 Powered suction pump.
(a)
Identification. A powered suction pump is a portable, AC-powered or compressed air-powered device intended to be used to remove infectious materials from wounds or fluids from a patient's airway or respiratory support system. The device may be used during surgery in the operating room or at the patient's bedside. The device may include a microbial filter.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 25, 2016
Stryker Corporation Division: Stryker Instruments Kim Wiersema Staff Regulatory Affairs Specialist 4100 E. Milham Ave Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001
Re: K153407
Trade/Device Name: Neptune 3 Waste Management System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4780 Regulation Name: Powered Suction Pump Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JCX, FYD Dated: March 23, 2016 Received: March 24, 2016
Dear Kim Wiersema:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
1
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Tejashri Purohit-Sheth, M.D.
Teiashri Purohit-Sheth, M.D. Clinical Deputy Director DAGRID/ODE/CDRH FOR
Erin I. Keith, M.S. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital. Respiratory. Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K153407
Device Name
Neptune 3 Waste Management System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Neptune 3 Waste Management System is intended to be used in the operating room, pathology, surgical centers and doctor's offices to collect and dispose of surgical fluid waste as well as collect smoke generated from electrocautery or laser devices.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- | -- |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
Prepared: 22 April 2016
I. SUBMITTER
Stryker Instruments 4100 E. Milham Avenue Kalamazoo, MI 49001 Phone: 269-323-7700
Contact: Kim Wiersema
II. DEVICE
| Name of Device: | Neptune 3 Waste Management System |
|---|---|
| Common/Usual Name: | Portable suction and smoke evacuation device |
| Regulation Numbers: | 21 CFR 878.4780 and 21 CFR 878.5070 |
| Regulation Name: | Powered Suction Pump |
| Apparatus, exhaust, surgical | |
| Regulatory Class: | II |
| Product Codes: | JCX and FYD |
| III. PREDICATE DEVICE | |
| Predicate Device | Stryker Neptune 2 Rover, K132671 |
| Reference Devices | Dornoch Ultra Suction System, K133786 |
| Buffalo Filter Porta Plumesafe, K924732 | |
| Valleylab OptiMumm Smoke Evacuator System, K980915 |
IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Neptune 3 Waste Management System provides fluid waste management, fluid volume measurement and surgical smoke evacuation capabilities and is also equipped with a motorized IV pole. The Stryker Neptune 3 Rover (Model Number 0703-001-000) is a mobile device used to suction and collect waste fluids and evacuate smoke during surgical procedures. The Stryker Neptune 3 Rover collects surgical waste fluid within a closed suction system and is paired with a compatible Stryker Neptune 2 Docking Station (0702-014-000) to facilitate disposal. The Stryker Neptune 3 Rover functions together with existing Neptune 2 components as follows:
| Stryker Neptune 2 Manifolds:
Product Code: JCX
510k: K132671 | Component providing an interface between the Rover and
suction tubing along with backflow prevention. May also
incorporate specimen collection capability (model
dependent). |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Fluid Suction High Efficiency
Particulate Air (HEPA) Filter:
Product Code: JCX
510k: K132671 | Component providing filtration of air drawn out of the fluid
collection canister. |
4
| Smoke Evacuation Ultra Low
Penetration Air (ULPA) Filter:
Product Code: FYD
510k: K132671 | Component providing filtration of evacuated smoke and air as
it passes through the Rover. The filter also provides an
interface to connect smoke evacuation accessories (1/4 inch,
3/8 inch, or 7/8 inch). |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|---|
V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Neptune 3 Waste Management System is intended to be used in the operating room, pathology, surgical centers and doctor's offices to collect and dispose of surgical fluid waste as well as collect smoke generated from electrocautery or laser devices.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
The Neptune 3 Waste Management System is contraindicated against:
- Connection directly to chest tubes.
- . Connection to closed wound drainage systems.
The Indications for Use are identical to the predicate device.
VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The following table identifies technological characteristics shared between the Predicate and Subject device:
| Predicate Device | Subject Device | |
|---|---|---|
| Indications for Use | Intended to be used in the operating | |
| room, pathology, surgical centers, and | ||
| doctor's offices to collect and dispose of | ||
| surgical fluid waste, as well as, collect | ||
| smoke generated from electrocautery or | ||
| laser devices. | Same | |
| Contraindications | Contraindicated against | |
| • Connection directly to chest tubes. | ||
| • Connection to closed wound drainage | ||
| systems. | Same | |
| For use with | • Neptune 2 Docking Station | |
| • Neptune 2 Manifolds | ||
| • Stryker HEPA & ULPA Filters | ||
| • Compatible Smoke Evacuation | ||
| accessories | ||
| • Compatible suction tubing and | ||
| accessories | Same | |
| Patient Contact | No direct or indirect patient contact | Same |
5
| Predicate Device | Subject Device | |
|---|---|---|
| Materials of Construction | Steel, aluminum, glass, insulation, TPE, thermoplastics, printed circuit board assemblies and electronic/wiring components | |
| HEPA, ULPA and carbon filter media | Same | |
| Energy Used | 120VAC, 60Hz, 12 A | Same |
| Electrical Isolation Type | Class I, Type CF Applied Part | Same |
| Electrical Safety & EMC | Tested and compliant with IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2 | Same |
| Design Features | Suction Characteristics Continuous suction Two independently operated suction levels Electronic regulator Electric pump HEPA filtration (exhaust) Low, Medium, High Vacuum Range Indicators Fluid Collection 24L collection capacity 2 canisters: 1 @ 20L, 1 @ 4L Fluid volume measurement Smoke Evacuation ULPA filtration Voltage-controlled motor Adjustable in 10% increments Manual and Automatic Modes 80 hour filter life IV Pole 4 hooks, powered actuation | Same |
The following differences between the subject and predicate device were considered in relation to the substantial equivalence determination:
- Disposables management the Neptune 3 Rover incorporates RFID technology to ● authenticate and track manifold use.
- The Neptune 3 Rover incorporates a touchscreen display
- . The Neptune 3 Rover has a higher maximum suction setting
- The Neptune 3 Rover incorporates a 4L canister illumination feature ●
- . The available smoke evacuation power range of the Neptune 3 Rover is expanded and provides a wider range of smoke evacuation flow rates
6
VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
Electrical safety and EMC testing were conducted on the Stryker Neptune 3 Rover. Testing included assessment of RF wireless performance. The device complies with the IEC 60601-1 standard for safety and the IEC 60601-1-2 standard for EMC.
Software Verification and Validation Testing
Software verification and validation testing was conducted and documentation was provided as recommended by FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices." The software for this device was considered as a "major" level of concern.
Mechanical Testing
Suction Performance
Rover fluid suction flow rate was evaluated simulating an emergent situation when clinicians might need to quickly aspirate fluids to provide surgical site visibility as well as worst case simulated use. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
ISO 10079-1 Electrically-powered suction safety
The Rover was evaluated against the minimum safety and performance requirements for medical and surgical suction equipment as defined in this international standard. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
Smoke Blower Performance
Smoke evacuation minimum and maximum flow rates were evaluated against predetermined acceptance criteria. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
IV Pole Performance
IV pole extension and retraction times were evaluated against predetermined acceptance criteria. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
Docking Performance
Evaluation of the Neptune 3 Rover compatibility with the Neptune 2 Docking Station included demonstration of waste off-load after worst-case clinical use conditions. The Neptune 3
7
Waste Management System met all identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
ULPA Filtration
Evaluation of the Neptune 3 Rover compatibility with the Neptune 2 ULPA filter included evaluation of UPLA rating in accordance with IEST-RP-CC007 under worst case flow and vacuum conditions. Neptune 3 Waste Management System met identified acceptance criteria, demonstrating passing results.
Human Factors Evaluation
Human factors analysis and usability testing was performed in support of the Substantial Equivalence determination and in accordance with FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Optimize Medical Device Design" and IEC 62366-1 "Medical Devices - Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices."
Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility data is not required to support a Substantial Equivalence determination as the Neptune 3 Rover is identical to the predicate device in that there are no components with direct or indirect patient contact.
Animal Study
Not Applicable - data from animal studies was not provided to support the Substantial Equivalence determination. Animal studies are not required to demonstrate safety or feasibility of the Neptune 3 Rover.
Clinical Studies
Not Applicable - data from clinical studies was not provided to support the Substantial Equivalence determination. Clinical studies are not required to demonstrate safety or feasibility of the Neptune 3 Rover.
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
The differences that exist between the Neptune 3 Rover and its predicate do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness. The results of non-clinical performance testing demonstrate that the Neptune 3 Rover will perform as intended and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.