(85 days)
No reference devices were used in this submission.
No
The document describes standard treatment planning software functionalities and dose calculation algorithms (Monte Carlo, pencil beam, Dose Painting) without mentioning AI or ML. The improvements over the predicate device are related to dose computation algorithms, beam modeling, and DICOM interface, not AI/ML capabilities.
No.
This device is a treatment planning system, a software that assists in planning radiation therapy, not a device that directly administers therapy or has a therapeutic effect itself.
No
This device is a treatment planning system for radiation therapy, which focuses on planning and analyzing treatment parameters and dose distributions rather than diagnosing medical conditions.
Yes
The device is explicitly described as a "software system" and a "software program" for treatment planning and analysis. While it interacts with hardware (CT scanners for input, radiation therapy devices for output), the device itself is solely the software component.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is for "treatment planning and analysis of radiation therapy administered with devices suitable for intraoperative radiotherapy." This is a therapeutic application, not a diagnostic one.
- Device Description: The device is described as a "treatment planning system," which is used to plan and analyze radiation therapy treatments. This aligns with a therapeutic purpose.
- Functionality: The core functions involve importing patient images, defining regions of interest, optimizing treatment parameters, computing dose distributions, and exporting plans. These are all steps in the process of delivering radiation therapy, not diagnosing a condition.
- Lack of Diagnostic Claims: There are no mentions of analyzing biological samples, detecting diseases, or providing diagnostic information about a patient's condition.
IVD devices are specifically designed to perform tests on samples taken from the human body (like blood, urine, tissue) to provide information for the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of a disease or condition. Radiance V3 does not perform such tests. It uses imaging data to plan a therapeutic intervention.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
Radiance V3 is a software system intented for treatment planning and analysis of radiation therapy administered with devices suitable for intraoperative radiotherapy.
The treatment plans provide treatment unit set-up parameters and estimates of dose distributions expected during the proposed treatment, and may be used to administer treatments after review and approval by the intended user. The system functionality can be configured based on user needs.
The intended users of Radiance V3 shall be clinically qualified radiation therapy staff trained in using the system.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
MUJ
Device Description
Radiance V3 is a treatment planning system, that is, a software program for planning and analysis of radiation therapy plans. Typically, a treatment plan is created by importing patient images obtained from a CT scanner, defining regions of interest either manually or semi-automatically, deciding on a treatment setup and objectives, optimizing the treatment parameters, comparing alternative plans to find the best compromise, computing the clinical dose distribution, approving the plan and exporting it.
Radiance V3 improvements over Radiance V2 (K133655) are:
- A Hybrid Monte Carlo dose computation algorithm for photons for the INTRABEAM.
- A beam modeling tool which models and verifies the treatment unit model with measurements for the INTRABEAM.
- An improved DICOM interface including PACS query&retrieve functionality. Storage SCP and DICOM.RT Structures and Dose exportation.
The list of compatible IOERT/IORT devices are:
- Intrabeam (a Carl Zeiss product)
- NOVAC7 and NOVAC11 (a SIT product)
- LIAC10 and LIAC12 (a SIT product)
- MOBETRON (an IntraOp Medical product)
- Conventional LINACs with adapted cylindrical IOERT applicators (telescopic or fixed ones).
Radiance V3 has been tested with Elekta/Precise and Varian/21EX LINACs with particular IOERT cylindrical telescopic applicators.
Characteristics of radiance include:
-
- Image manipulation and visualization
-
- IORT applicator simulation
-
- Contouring manual and interpolation tools
-
- Dose calculation algorithms, including:
- a. For Intrabeam, Dose Painting for a fast (a few seconds) interpolation of PDD around the applicator or Hybrid Monte Carlo for a good combination of computation time (a few minutes) and accuracy.
- b. For IOERT, pencil beam for a fast (less than one minute) calculation of the dose or Monte Carlo for a good combination of computation time (between 1-10 minutes in most of the cases) and accuracy.
-
- Reporting.
-
- DICOM & DICOM.RT compatibility
Mentions image processing
Yes
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found.
Input Imaging Modality
Externally acquired patient medical images and user input.
Anatomical Site
Not Found.
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found.
Intended User / Care Setting
Radiance V3 is a software system intended for treatment planning and analysis of radiation therapy administered with devices suitable for intraoperative radiotherapy.
The intended users of Radiance V3 shall be clinically qualified radiation therapy staff trained in using the system.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found.
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Verification tests were written and executed to ensure that the system is working as designed. Over 150 tests were executed, including tests to verify requirements for new product functionality, tests to ensure the risks mitigation functions as intended, and regression tests to ensure continued safety and effectiveness of existing functionality. Radiance V3 passed testing and was deemed safe and effective for its intended use.
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Non Clinical Data: Validation and Verification Testing carried out on the Radiance V3 indicates that it meets its predefined products requirements and requirements from the following product standards:
- IEC 61217 Radiotherapy equipment - Coordinates, movements and scales
- IEC 62083 Medical electrical equipment - Requirements for the safety of radiotherapy treatment planning systems
- IEC 62366 Medical devices - Application of usability engineering to medical devices
Clinical Data: Clinical trials were not performed as part of the development of this product. Clinical testing on patients is not advantageous in demonstrating substantial equivalence or safety and effectiveness of the device since testing can be performed such that no human subjects are exposed to risk. Validation testing involved simulated clinical workflows, and algorithm testing which validated the accuracy of dose calculation functions using a simulated clinical setup. The product was deemed fit for clinical use.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found.
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
No reference devices were used in this submission.
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found.
§ 892.5050 Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system.
(a)
Identification. A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II. When intended for use as a quality control system, the film dosimetry system (film scanning system) included as an accessory to the device described in paragraph (a) of this section, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with two snakes entwined around it, and the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol. The caduceus is depicted in black, and the text is also in black.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
February 16, 2016
GMV Soluciones Globales Internet S.A.U. % Ms. Patsy Trisler Regulatory Consultant Oserve Group US Inc. P.O. Box 940 CHARLESTOWN NH 03603
Re: K153368
Trade/Device Name: Radiance V3 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5050 Regulation Name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MUJ Dated: November 19, 2015 Received: November 23, 2015
Dear Ms. Trisler:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
1
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Michael D'Hara
For
Robert Ochs, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K153368
Device Name Radiance V3
Indications for Use (Describe)
Radiance V3 is a software system intented for treatment planning and analysis of radiation therapy administered with devices suitable for intraoperative radiotherapy.
The treatment plans provide treatment unit set-up parameters and estimates of dose distributions expected during the proposed treatment, and may be used to administer treatments after review and approval by the intended user. The system functionality can be configured based on user needs.
The intended users of Radiance V3 shall be clinically qualified radiation therapy staff trained in using the system.
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
1. SUBMITTER
510(k) Summarv
Submitter Name: | GMV Soluciones Globales Internet S.A.U. | |
---|---|---|
Submitter Address: | Isaac Newton, 11; PTM Tres Cantos | |
Madrid 28760 | ||
Spain | ||
Phone Number: | 011 34 91 807 22 70 | |
Fax Number: | 011 34 91 807 21 99 | |
Contact Person: | Carlos Illana Alejandro | |
Date Prepared: | 30 October 2015 | |
2. DEVICE | ||
Device Trade Name: | Radiance V3 | |
Common Name: | Radiation Treatment Planning Software |
Classification Name, Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system 21 CFR 892.5050 Number & Product Code: MUJ
3. PREDICATE DEVICE
K133655 Predicate Devices: Radiance V2 (cleared 01/31/2015) This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall. No reference devices were used in this submission.
4. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
Radiance V3 is a treatment planning system, that is, a software program for planning and analysis of radiation therapy plans. Typically, a treatment plan is created by importing patient images obtained from a CT scanner, defining regions of interest either manually or semi-automatically, deciding on a treatment setup and objectives, optimizing the treatment parameters, comparing alternative plans to find the best compromise, computing the clinical dose distribution, approving the plan and exporting it.
Radiance V3 improvements over Radiance V2 (K133655) are:
- A Hybrid Monte Carlo dose computation algorithm for photons for the ● INTRABEAM.
- . A beam modeling tool which models and verifies the treatment unit model with measurements for the INTRABEAM.
- . An improved DICOM interface including PACS query&retrieve functionality. Storage SCP and DICOM.RT Structures and Dose exportation.
The list of compatible IOERT/IORT devices are:
- Intrabeam (a Carl Zeiss product) ●
- . NOVAC7 and NOVAC11 (a SIT product)
- . LIAC10 and LIAC12 (a SIT product)
- MOBETRON (an IntraOp Medical product)
- . Conventional LINACs with adapted cylindrical IOERT applicators (telescopic or fixed ones).
Radiance V3 has been tested with Elekta/Precise and Varian/21EX LINACs with particular IOERT cylindrical telescopic applicators.
4
Characteristics of radiance include:
-
- Image manipulation and visualization
-
- IORT applicator simulation
-
- Contouring manual and interpolation tools
-
- Dose calculation algorithms, including:
- a. For Intrabeam, Dose Painting for a fast (a few seconds) interpolation of PDD around the applicator or Hybrid Monte Carlo for a good combination of computation time (a few minutes) and accuracy.
- b. For IOERT, pencil beam for a fast (less than one minute) calculation of the dose or Monte Carlo for a good combination of computation time (between 1-10 minutes in most of the cases) and accuracy.
-
- Reporting.
-
- DICOM & DICOM.RT compatibility
5. INDICATIONS FOR USE
Radiance V3 is a software system intended for treatment planning and analysis of radiation therapy administered with devices suitable for intraoperative radiotherapy.
The treatment plans provide treatment unit set-up parameters and estimates of dose distributions expected during the proposed treatment, and may be used to administer treatments after review and approval by the intended user.
The system functionality can be configured based on user needs.
The intended users of Radiance V3 shall be clinically qualified radiation therapy staff trained in using the system.
6. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH PREDICATE DEVICE
| Summary of
Technological
Characteristics | The technological characteristics are essentially the same as
those of the predicate.
Both devices produce treatment plans with corresponding dose
distributions computed using a three dimensional dosimetry
engine. Both devices have a function of electronic approval of
treatment plans by trained and authorized staff, and export in
DICOM format for commencing treatment or archiving. |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Substantial
Equivalence | From the standpoint of both functionality and workflow the
Radiance V3 device is substantially equivalent to the identified
predicate as follows:
• Within Radiance V3 and its predicate Radiance V2, the user
can adjust parameters to achieve a predicted outcome, rather
than make a decision intra-operatively.
• Radiance V3 and its predicate Radiance V2 are designed to
analyze and plan radiation treatments in three dimensions for
the purpose of treating patients with malignancies. |
5
- Radiance V3 and its predicate Radiance V2 provide treatment plans with estimates of dose distributions expected during the proposed treatment, and may be used to administer treatments after review and approval by qualified medical personnel.
- · Radiance V3 and its predicate Radiance V2 use externally acquired medical images and user input to achieve the result.
The Radiance V3 dose distribution computation algorithms are identical to those implemented in Radiance V2 except for Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for INTRABEAM that has been added. Radiance V2 dose calculation algorithm is what we call 'Dose Painting' which is an interpolation of the PDD around the applicator (assuming isotropy). Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm corrects the dose according to the tissue density which provides a more accurate simulation of the dose received to the tissue. Verification tests were written and executed to ensure that the system is working as designed. Over 150 tests were executed, including tests to verify requirements for new product functionality, tests to ensure the risks mitigation functions as intended, and regression tests to ensure continued safety and effectiveness of existing functionality. Radiance V3 passed testing and was deemed safe and effective for its intended use.
7. PERFORMANCE DATA
| Non Clinical Data | Validation and Verification Testing carried out on the Radiance V3 indicates that it meets its predefined products requirements and requirements from the following product standards:
• IEC 61217 Radiotherapy equipment - Coordinates, movements and scales
• IEC 62083 Medical electrical equipment - Requirements for the safety of radiotherapy treatment planning systems
• IEC 62366 Medical devices - Application of usability engineering to medical devices |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Clinical Data | Clinical trials were not performed as part of the development of this product. Clinical testing on patients is not advantageous in demonstrating substantial equivalence or safety and effectiveness of the device since testing can be performed such that no human subjects are exposed to risk. Validation testing involved simulated clinical workflows, and algorithm testing which validated the accuracy of dose calculation functions using a simulated clinical setup. The product was deemed fit for clinical use. |
6
Item 4b of Table I in the FDA Guidance document entitled, Software Verification "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for and Validation Software Contained in Medical Devices asks, "Does the Software Testing Device control the delivery of potentially harmful enerqy that could result in death or serious injury, such as radiation treatment systems..." Radiance V3 does not directly control the linear accelerator that delivers the radiation. Once completed, plans are reviewed and approved by qualified clinicians and may be subject to quality assurance practices before treatment actually takes place. There is no automatic link between the Radiance V3 software and the linear accelerator. However, should a flaw in the treatment plan escape the notice of the qualified professionals using the Radiance V3 system, serious injury or death could result. Therefore, we believe Radiance V3 to be of major level of concern.
8. CONCLUSION
The information discussed above demonstrates that the Radiance V3 device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
7
Feature | New Device: Radiance V3 | Predicate: Radiance V2 |
---|---|---|
510(k) Number | K153368 | K133655 |
Manufacturer | GMV Soluciones Globales | |
Internet S.A.U. | GMV Soluciones Globales | |
Internet S.A.U. | ||
Classification # | ||
& Product Code | 21 CFR 892.5050 | |
MUJ | 21 CFR 892.5050 | |
MUJ | ||
Indication for | ||
use | Radiance V3 is a software | |
system intended for treatment | ||
planning and analysis of | ||
intraoperative radiation therapy | ||
administered with devices | ||
suitable for intraoperative | ||
radiotherapy. | Radiance V2 is a software | |
system intended for treatment | ||
planning and analysis of | ||
intraoperative radiation therapy | ||
administered with devices | ||
suitable for intraoperative | ||
radiotherapy. | ||
The treatment plans provide | ||
treatment unit set-up parameters | ||
and estimates of dose | ||
distributions expected during the | ||
proposed treatment, and may be | ||
used to administer treatments | ||
after review and approval by the | ||
intended user. | The treatment plans provide | |
treatment unit set-up | ||
parameters and estimates of | ||
dose distributions expected | ||
during the proposed treatment, | ||
and may be used to administer | ||
treatments after review and | ||
approval by the intended user. | ||
The system functionality can be | ||
configured based on user needs. | The system functionality can be | |
configured based on user | ||
needs. | ||
The intended users of Radiance | ||
V3 shall be clinically qualified | ||
radiation therapy staff trained in | ||
using the system. | The intended users of | |
Radiance V2 shall be clinically | ||
qualified radiation therapy staff | ||
trained in using the system. | ||
System Design | Software only | Software only |
Calculation for | ||
electrons | Dose distributions computed | |
using a three dimensional dose | ||
engine. | Dose distributions computed | |
using a three dimensional dose | ||
engine. | ||
Pencil Beam computation and | ||
Monte Carlo Computation for | ||
electrons | Pencil Beam computation and | |
Monte Carlo Computation for | ||
electrons | ||
Calculation for | ||
photons | Dose Painting (Planning | |
calculation interpolation of PDD | ||
measurements) and | ||
Hybrid Monte Carlo computation | Dose Painting (Planning | |
calculation interpolation of PDD | ||
measurements) | ||
Feature | New Device: Radiance V3 | Predicate: Radiance V2 |
Input | Externally acquired patient | |
medical images and user input. | ||
Calibration files and beam | ||
modeling measurements for | ||
INTRABEAM. | Externally acquired patient | |
medical images and user input. | ||
Calibration files for | ||
INTRABEAM. | ||
Output | Treatment plans with | |
corresponding dose distributions | Treatment plans with | |
corresponding dose | ||
distributions | ||
Plan review and | ||
approval | Allows electronic approval of | |
treatment plans by trained and | ||
authorized staff | Allows electronic approval of | |
treatment plans by trained and | ||
authorized staff | ||
Dose calculation | ||
algorithm | ||
confirmation | Algorithms confirmed for a wide | |
variety of field geometries, | ||
treatment units, treatment setups | ||
and patient positions, including | ||
different dose grid resolution | ||
settings. | Algorithms confirmed for a wide | |
variety of field geometries, | ||
treatment units, treatment | ||
setups and patient positions, | ||
including different dose grid | ||
resolution settings. | ||
Beam modeling | ||
tool | Beam modeling of the treatment | |
unit based on relative | ||
measurements and output | ||
factors. | Beam modeling of the | |
treatment unit based on relative | ||
measurements and output | ||
factors. |
Summary of Technical Characteristics and Comparison to Predicate
8