(289 days)
Not Found
No
The summary describes a mechanical motor system for bone cutting and drilling. There is no mention of AI, ML, image processing, or any data-driven decision-making components. The performance studies are based on bench testing of mechanical function and safety.
No.
The device is used for cutting, sawing, and drilling bone during surgical procedures, which are considered operative functions, not therapeutic.
No
The device is described as an "Electro Motor System" intended for "high speed cutting, sawing, and drilling of bone." This indicates it is a surgical tool used for mechanical action, not for diagnosing conditions or diseases.
No
The device description explicitly states it is an "electrical motor system consisting of a control unit with different sizes and types of handpieces, each containing its own integrated motor, and attachments such as burrs, saw blades, drills, etc." This clearly indicates the presence of significant hardware components beyond just software.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states the device is for "high speed cutting, sawing, and drilling of bone" during surgical procedures. This is a direct surgical intervention on the patient's body.
- Device Description: The description details a motor system with handpieces and attachments for physical manipulation of bone. This aligns with surgical tools, not diagnostic tests performed on samples outside the body.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: There is no mention of analyzing biological samples (blood, tissue, urine, etc.), detecting analytes, or providing diagnostic information based on in vitro testing.
IVD devices are designed to examine specimens derived from the human body to provide information for diagnostic, monitoring, or compatibility purposes. This device is a surgical tool used directly on the patient during a procedure.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The ELAN 4 Electro Motor System is intended for high speed cutting, sawing, and drilling of bone in the fields of Spine, ENT, Neuro, and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
HBE
Device Description
The ELAN 4 Electro motor system is an electrical motor system consisting of a control unit with different sizes and types of handpieces, each containing its own integrated motor, and attachments such as burrs, saw blades, drills, etc. The system allows for high-speed dissection at up to 80,000 RPM while also allowing low speed cutting between 1,000 and 20,000 RPM. System settings are controlled with the touch screen panel of the control unit, while all functions of the handpieces can be controlled from the sterile field by the foot control.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
bone in the fields of Spine, ENT, Neuro, and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Bench testing was performed with each handpiece to demonstrate equivalent or improved performance in comparison to the predicate device. Bench testing summaries are below. Each handpiece demonstrated equivalent or improved performance compared to the acceptance criteria.
Bench Testing of ELAN 4 Attachments (Elan 4 Bench Testing Handpieces Summary Table)
- Study Type: Bench Testing
- Sample Size: 120 cycles
- Key Results:
- Contour milling could be performed without affecting the test pattern itself: Pass
- Tool is manually decoupled (with actuator): Pass (120 times "OK", ie at 120 cycles of use, the tool was automatically coupled and uncoupled manually. There were no problems with tool coupling.)
- Determining the weight before the RDG / after the RDG / after the oiling / after the Sterilization has shown that the weight remained constant before and just after the entire processing cycle: Pass
- No impairment of function and safety during and after at least 100 applications and processing cycles: Pass
- Labels are still readable after min.100 application and processing cycles: Pass
- Motor cable can be coupled and uncoupled: Pass (After 120 cycles the motor cables could be easily coupled/uncoupled.)
- No interruption of operation by releasing the cable: Pass
- No interruption of operation due to failure of electrical components: Pass
- No interruption of operation due to failure of mechanical components: Pass
- Tool is securely locked during the function test and the use: Pass
Elan 4 Bench Testing Craniotome Handpiece Summary Table
- Study Type: Bench Testing
- Sample Size: 123 cycles
- Key Results:
- Tools can be attached automatically and released manually: Pass
- Reprocessing procedure does not cause any functional or safety impairments: Pass
- All other testing requirements must be passed: Pass
- Labels and other identifying information remains readable after set amount of reprocessing cycles: Pass
- Motor cable consistently couples and uncouples: Pass
- No safety or function impairments due to cable release: Pass
- No safety or function impairments due to failure of electrical components: Pass
- No safety or function impairments due to failure of mechanical components: Pass
- No safety or function impairments due to failure or tool lock mechanism: Pass
- Temperature remains in acceptable range throughout testing: Pass
Elan 4 Bench Testing Perforator Summary Table
- Study Type: Bench Testing
- Sample Size: 100 cycles
- Key Results:
- Sterilization Test: PASS
- Bracket System Test: PASS
- Function Test: PASS
- Plug Testing: PASS
- Lubrication Testing: PASS
- Perforation Test: PASS
- Weight and Temperature Test: PASS
Elan 4 Bench Testing Reciprocating Saw Handpiece Summary Table
- Study Type: Bench Testing
- Sample Size: 100 cycles
- Key Results:
- Cleaning and Disinfection Test: PASS
- Sterilization Test: PASS
- Bracket Test: PASS
- Lubrication Test: PASS
- Function Test: PASS
- Motor Cable Test: PASS
- Performance Test: PASS
- Temperature Measurement Test: PASS
Elan 4 Bench Testing Sagittal Saw Handpiece Summary Table
- Study Type: Bench Testing
- Sample Size: 100 cycles
- Key Results:
- Cleaning Test: PASS
- Sterilization Test: PASS
- Bracket Test: PASS
- Lubrication Test: PASS
- Motor Cable Test: PASS
- Performance Test: PASS
- Temperature Test: PASS
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 882.4360 Electric cranial drill motor.
(a)
Identification. An electric cranial drill motor is an electrically operated power source used with removable rotating surgical cutting tools or drill bits on a patient's skull.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular border with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" written around it. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, with flowing lines extending from the profiles.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
July 22, 2016
Aesculap, Inc. Mr. Peter Stoll Regulatory Affairs Specialist 3773 Corporate Parkway Center Valley, PA 18034
Re: K152960
Trade/Device Name: ELAN 4 Electro Motor System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4310 Regulation Name: Powered Simple Cranial Drills, Burrs, Trephines, and Their Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HBE Dated: June 3, 2016 Received: June 23, 2016
Dear Mr. Stoll:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices. good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
1
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Carlos L. Pena -S
Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K152960
Device Name ELAN 4 Electro Motor System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The ELAN 4 Electro Motor System is intended for high speed cutting, sawing, and drilling of bone in the fields of Spine, ENT, Neuro, and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
---|
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
Over The Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
510(k) SUMMARY (as required by 21 CFR 807.92) ELAN 4 Greet q'Motor System
July 21, 2016
| COMPANY: | Aesculap®, Inc.
3773 Corporate Parkway Center Valley,
PA 18034
Establishment Registration Number: 2916714 |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CONTACT: | Peter Stoll
610-984-9076 (phone)
610-791-6882 (fax) |
| TRADENAME: | ELAN 4 Electro Motor System |
| COMMON NAME: | Drills, Burrs, Trephines & Accessories (Simple, Powered) |
| CLASSIFICATION NAME: | Powered simple cranial drills, burrs, trephines and their accessories |
| CLASSIFICATION PANEL: | Neurology |
| REGULATION NUMBER: | 21 CFR 882.4310 |
PRODUCT CODE: HBE
SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
The ELAN 4 Electro Motor System is substantially equivalent to Aesculap's Microspeed Uni Motor System cleared via K053526.
DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The ELAN 4 Electro motor system is an electrical motor system consisting of a control unit with different sizes and types of handpieces, each containing its own integrated motor, and attachments such as burrs, saw blades, drills, etc. The system allows for high-speed dissection at up to 80,000 RPM while also allowing low speed cutting between 1,000 and 20,000 RPM. System settings are controlled with the touch screen panel of the control unit, while all functions of the handpieces can be controlled from the sterile field by the foot control.
INDICATIONS FOR USE
The ELAN 4 Electro motor system is intended for high speed cutting, sawing, and drilling of bone in the fields of Spine, ENT, Neuro, and Maxillofacial Surgery.
TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS (compared to predicates)
The modifications made to the ELAN 4 Electro motor system do not affect the fundamental scientific technology. The design, materials, and principal of operation have not changed for these devices. The ELAN 4 Electro Motor System offers similar operating speeds, power sources, and attachments as the predicate device. A table of the modifications between the predicate and the ELAN 4 Electro is below. The performance of the device was determined to be equivalent or improved for the device, in comparison to the predicate, due to each of the changes. Material changes such as changing to stainless steel or another type of PEEK were evaluated and determined to
4
present no new risk to patients. Additionally, new features such as the distal tool adaptation and burr release mechanism were determined to present no new risk to patient and improved the performance of the device by reducing temperature and ensuring burrs do not release during use. This comparison supports the claim of substantial equivalence to the predicate device for the proposed intended use.
| Device Modification | Risk | Verification
Activity | Acceptance
Criteria | Results of
Verification |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| handpieces (GA) | | | | |
| material change from
titinium alloy to stainless
steel | No new risk to
patient. | Verification
testing and
biocompatibility
testing per ISO
10993-1 | Engineering
specification | Pass. Does not
raise new
questions of
safety and
effectiveness. |
| material change from
PEEK (blue) to PEEK
(black) | No new risk to
patient. | Verification
testing (also see
Appendix A
below) | Engineering
specification | Pass. Does not
raise new
questions of
safety and
effectiveness. |
| motor and handpiece has
no coupling (one piece) | no new risk to
patient | Verification
testing (also see
Appendix A
below) | Engineering
specification | Pass. Does not
raise new
questions of
safety and
effectiveness. |
| tool adaption at distal end
of handpiece | no new risk to
patient | Verification
testing (also see
Appendix A
below) | Engineering
specification | Pass. Does not
raise new
questions of
safety and
effectiveness. |
| burr release only in off
position mechanism | no new risk to
patient | Verification
testing (also see
Appendix A
below) | Engineering
specification | Pass. Does not
raise new
questions of
safety and
effectiveness. |
Comparison To Predicate
System | Elan 4 Electro (subject of this submission) | Microspeed Uni |
---|---|---|
K# | K152960 | K053526 |
Indications for Use | The Elan 4 Electro motor system is intended for high speed cutting, sawing, and drilling of bone in the fields of Spine, ENT, Neuro, and Maxillofacial Surgery. | Aesculap's Microspeed Uni is intended for high speed cutting, sawing, drilling and manipulation of soft tissue and bone in the fields of Spine, ENT, Neuro, and Maxillofacial Surgery. |
Control Unit | 2 of 11 | |
Maximum | 80,000 rpm | 80,000 rpm |
5
speed | ||
---|---|---|
Voltage | 100-240 V | 100 - 240V |
Frequency | 50-60Hz | 50 - 60Hz |
Irrigation | ||
Pump | Yes | Yes |
Motor | ||
High speed | ||
motor | ||
Min/Max | 10,000/ 80,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm / 80,000 rpm |
Low speed | ||
motor | ||
Min/Max | 1,000/ 20,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm / 40,000 rpm |
Motor | ||
rotation | ||
High speed | Left and right hand rotation | Left and right hand rotation |
Low speed | Left and right hand rotation | Left and right hand rotation |
Materials | Stainless Steel | Titanium Alloy |
Features | ||
Control | ||
mechanism | Foot | Hand and foot |
Ability to | ||
connect | ||
various | ||
Handpieces | Yes | Yes |
Motor | ||
connections | 2 | 2 |
Footswitch | ||
connections | 1 | 1 |
Control Unit | Touch screen | Touch screen |
Applied | ||
standards | UL2601-1 | |
IEC60601-1 | ||
IEC60601-1-2 | ||
IEC62304 | UL2601-1 | |
IEC60601-1 | ||
IEC60601-1-2 |
PERFORMANCE DATA
ELAN 4 Electro Motor System has been tested in accordance with FDA recognized standards IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 62304, and UL 2601-1. Bench testing was performed with each handpiece to demonstrate equivalent or improved performance in comparison to the predicate device. Bench testing summaries are below. Each handpiece demonstrated equivalent or improved performance compared to the acceptance criteria.
Bench Testing of ELAN 4 Attachments
Elan 4 Bench Testing Handpieces Summary Table
Requirement | Acceptance | Sample | Results |
---|---|---|---|
contour milling could | |||
be performed without | |||
affecting the test | |||
pattern itself. | as representative of the | ||
standard tool portfolio "XS" | |||
is per application and | |||
processing cycle with the | |||
test pattern to be milled | |||
{Drill hand pieces GA861 | |||
and GA864} in bone | |||
replacement material {ash | |||
hardwood}. Definition of | |||
the tools used, | 120 cycles | The 120 application | |
cycles, i.e. "a" | |||
contour milling | |||
could be performed | |||
without affecting by | |||
the test pattern itself | |||
Pass | |||
Coupling | |||
Toolfunctions | Tool is | ||
manually | |||
decouple | |||
d {with | |||
actuator) | 120 times | 120 times "OK", ie | |
at 120 cycles of use, | |||
the tool was | |||
automatically | |||
coupled and | |||
uncoupled | |||
manually. There | |||
were no problems | |||
with tool coupling. | |||
PASS | |||
Determining the | |||
weight before the | |||
RDG / after the | |||
RDG / after the | |||
oiling / after the | |||
Sterilization has | |||
shown that the | |||
weight remained | |||
constant before and | |||
just after the entire | |||
processing cycle. | No impairment of function and | ||
safety by cleaning, | |||
Disinfection and steam | |||
sterilization | 120 cycles | During the preparation | |
and application of 120 | |||
cycles, there were no | |||
function and safety | |||
impairments caused by | |||
cleaning, disinfection | |||
and steam sterilization. | |||
PASS | |||
To evaluate the | |||
acceptance criteria, all | |||
analysis of all of the | |||
other 20 acceptance | |||
criteria can be used. | |||
Since all other 20 | |||
acceptance criteria | |||
were "satisfied" rated, | |||
this also applies to | |||
requirement (5). After | |||
and during 120 | |||
application and | |||
processing cycles, | |||
there was no | |||
functional and safety | |||
impairments. | No impairment of | ||
function and safety | |||
during and after at least | |||
100 applications and | |||
processing cycles | 120 cycles | Since all other | |
acceptance criteria | |||
were satisfied this | |||
requirement can be | |||
determined to have | |||
met acceptance | |||
criteria. PASS | |||
After 120th | |||
processing and | |||
application cycles all | |||
relevant information | |||
(manufacturer, part | |||
number, serial | |||
number) the labels | |||
are still identifiable / | |||
readable. | Labels are still readable | ||
after min.100 application | |||
and processing cycles | 120 cycles | After 120 cycles all | |
relevant information | |||
are still | |||
identifiable/readable. | |||
PASS | |||
120 times "OK", at | |||
120 cycles of use, | |||
the motor cables | |||
could be easily | |||
coupled and | |||
uncoupled. | Motor cable can be | ||
coupled and uncoupled | 120 cycles | After 120 cycles the | |
motor cables could be | |||
easily | |||
coupled/uncoupled. | |||
PASS | |||
120 times "no", ie at | |||
120 cycles of use, | |||
there was no | |||
interruption of | |||
operation through | |||
the cable | No interruption of | ||
operation by releasing | |||
the cable | 120 cycles | After 120 cycles there | |
was no interruption of | |||
operation through the | |||
cable. PASS | |||
120 times "no", at | |||
120 cycles of use, | |||
there was no | |||
operation | |||
interruption due to | |||
failure of electrical | |||
components | interruption of operation | ||
due to failure of | |||
electrical components | 120 cycles | After 120 cycles no | |
operation interruption | |||
due to failure of | |||
electrical | |||
components. PASS | |||
120 times "no", ie at | |||
120 cycles of use, | |||
there was no | |||
interruption due to | |||
failure of mechanical | |||
components. | No interruption of | ||
operation due to failure | |||
of mechanical | |||
components | 120 cycles | After 120 cycles no | |
operation interruption | |||
due to failure of | |||
mechanical | |||
components. PASS | |||
120 times "no", at | |||
120 cycles of use the | |||
tool during | |||
application was | |||
securely locked and | |||
there was thus no | |||
interruption | Tool is securely locked | ||
during the function test | |||
and the use | 120 cycles | After 120 cycles the | |
tool was securely | |||
locked and there was | |||
no interruption. PASS |
6
7
8
Elan 4 Bench Testing Craniotome Handpiece Summary Table
Requirement | Acceptance Criteria | Sample Size | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Tools can be | |||
attached | |||
automatically | |||
and released | |||
manually | Tool can be | ||
consistently coupled | |||
and uncoupled | 123 cycles | After 123 cycles the tool | |
was automatically | |||
coupled and manually | |||
decoupled with no | |||
problems. PASS | |||
No performance or | |||
safety impairments | |||
were caused by | |||
cleaning, | |||
disinfecting or steam | |||
sterilization | Reprocessing procedure | ||
does not cause any | |||
functional or safety | |||
impairments | 123 cycles | No performance or | |
safety impairments | |||
caused by cleaning, | |||
disinfecting or | |||
sterilization. Weight | |||
remained constant | |||
To evaluate the | |||
acceptance criteria, | |||
all analysis of all of | |||
the other acceptance | |||
criteria can be used. | |||
Since all other | |||
acceptance criteria | |||
were "satisfied" | |||
rated, this also | |||
applies to | |||
requirement (5). | |||
After and during 123 | |||
application and | |||
processing cycles, | |||
there was no | |||
functional and safety | |||
impairments. | All other testing | ||
requirements must be | |||
passed | 123 cycles | Since all other | |
acceptance criteria were | |||
satisfied this | |||
requirement can be | |||
determined to have met | |||
acceptance criteria. | |||
PASS | |||
After 123rd | |||
processing and | |||
application cycles all | |||
relevant information | |||
(manufacturer, part | |||
number, serial | |||
number) the labels | |||
are still identifiable / | |||
readable. | Labels and other | ||
identifying | |||
information remains | |||
readable after set | |||
amount of | |||
reprocessing cycles | 123 cycles | After 123 cycles all | |
relevant information are | |||
still | |||
identifiable/readable. | |||
PASS | |||
123 times | |||
'OK' motor | |||
cable could | |||
be easily | |||
coupled and | |||
uncoupled | Motor cable | ||
consistently couples | |||
and uncouples | 123 cycles | After 123 cycles motor | |
cables are easily | |||
coupled/uncoupled. | |||
PASS | |||
123 times | |||
'no' at 123 cycles there | |||
was no | |||
interruption | |||
of operation | |||
due to release | |||
of cable | No safety or function | ||
impairments due to | |||
cable release | 123 cycles | After 123 cycles there | |
was no interruption of | |||
operation due to cable | |||
release. PASS | |||
123 times | |||
'no' at 123 cycles there | |||
was no | |||
interruption | |||
of operation | |||
due to failure | |||
of electrical | |||
components | No safety or function | ||
impairments due to | |||
failure of electrical | |||
components | 123 cycles | After 123 cycles there | |
was no interruption of | |||
operation due to failure | |||
of electrical | |||
components. PASS | |||
123 times | |||
'no' at 123 cycles there | |||
was no | |||
interruption | |||
of operation | |||
due to failure | |||
of | |||
mechanical | |||
components | No safety or function | ||
impairments due to | |||
failure of mechanical | |||
components | 123 cycles | After 123 cycles there | |
was no interruption of | |||
operation due to failure | |||
of mechanical | |||
components. PASS | |||
123 times | |||
'no' at 123 cycles the | |||
tool was | |||
securely | |||
locked and | |||
there was | |||
thus no | |||
interruption | No safety or function | ||
impairments due to | |||
failure or tool lock | |||
mechanism | 123 cycles | After 123 cycles the tool | |
was securely locked and | |||
there was no | |||
interruption. PASS | |||
Temperature | |||
measurement: | |||
Check | |||
temperature | |||
of hand-piece | |||
at 3 defined | |||
times during | |||
the course of | |||
the 123 cycle | |||
test | Temperature remains | ||
in acceptable range | |||
throughout testing | 123 cycles | 10th, 51st, and 101st | |
cycle are all PASS |
9
10
11
Elan 4 Bench Testing Perforator Summary Table
Requirement | Acceptance Criteria | Sample Size | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Processing test (See below | |||
for sub-tests) | |||
Sterilization Test | |||
(Processing sub-test 1) | Reprocessing does not | ||
result in any functional or | |||
safety issues | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Bracket System Test | |||
(Processing sub-test 2) | Motors held securely | ||
during processing | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Function Test (Processing sub- | |||
test 3) | Tool securely locked | ||
and could be safely | |||
removed | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Plug Testing | |||
(Processing sub-test 4) | Motor cable was safe, | ||
easy and error-free | |||
coupling and | |||
uncoupling | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Lubrication Testing | |||
(Processing sub-test 5) | Lack of lubrication did | ||
not cause impairment | |||
of function or safety | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Perforation Test | Perforator broke through | ||
material and turned off | |||
automatically after | |||
breaking through | 100 cycles | PASS |
12
| Weight and
Temperature Test | Perforator hand piece
maintained a consistent
weight and temperature
range throughout testing | 100 cycles | PASS |
-------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------ |
---|
Elan 4 Bench Testing Reciprocating Saw Handpiece Summary Table
Requirement | Acceptance Criteria | Sample Size | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Cleaning and | |||
Disinfection Test | No functional or safety issues | ||
caused by cleaning and | |||
disinfection procedures | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Sterilization | |||
Test | No functional or safety issues | ||
caused by sterilization | |||
procedure. | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Bracket Test | Saw held securely during | ||
reprocessing, transport and | |||
storage | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Lubrication Test | No impairment of safety or | ||
function due to lack of | |||
lubrication | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Function Test | Tool is static and locked | ||
securely. Tool can be safely | |||
removed. Oscillation of tool | |||
functions. No functional or | |||
safety issues as a result of | |||
material changes | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Motor Cable | |||
Test | Motor cable can be coupled | ||
and uncoupled safely, easily, | |||
and without error. | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Performance | |||
Test | Sawing motion (oscillation) | ||
is consistent and cut is at | |||
least 6cm. | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Temperature | |||
Measurement | |||
Test | Temperature remains in | ||
acceptable range throughout | |||
testing | 100 cycles | ||
(temperature | |||
measured every 20 | |||
cycles) | PASS |
13
Requirement | Acceptance Criteria | Sample Size | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Cleaning Test | No function or safety issues as | ||
a result of the cleaning and | |||
disinfection procedure | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Sterilization Test | No function or safety issues as a | ||
result of the sterilization | |||
procedure | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Bracket Test | Saw remained secure during | ||
reprocessing, transport and | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Lubrication Test | No safety or function issues | ||
due to lack of lubrication | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Motor Cable Test | No impairment of the | ||
connection and disconnection | |||
process | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Performance Test | Sawing motion and cut is | ||
constant and consistent | 100 cycles | PASS | |
Temperature Test | Temperature remains in | ||
acceptable range throughout | |||
testing | 100 cycles | PASS |
Elan 4 Bench Testing Sagittal Saw Handpiece Summary Table
SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE CONCLUSION
Bench testing results along with a comparison between the technology and materials used in the ELAN 4 Electro Motor System and the predicate device, demonstrates that the ELAN 4 Electro Motor System meets or exceeds the performance of the predicate device. Bench testing for each handpiece was conducted with pass/fail criteria that would demonstrate equivalent or improved performance in comparison to the predicate as intended in the specified use conditions. The bench testing results and technological comparison demonstrate that the ELAN 4 Electro Motor System performs comparably to the predicate device currently marketed.