K Number
K152230
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2015-09-03

(27 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
870.1250
Panel
CV
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Ebony® PTA 0.014" RX Peripheral Dilatation Catheter is intended for dilatation of lesions in the iliac, femoral, popliteal, infra popliteal, and renal arteries. This catheter is not intended for use in coronary or neuro-vasculature.

Device Description

The EBONY® PTA 0.014" RX Dilatation Catheter is a standard rapid exchange (RX) PTA catheter with a semi-compliant inflatable balloon and tapered tip on the distal end. Two radiopaque markers facilitate proper balloon positioning across the stenosis, and a hydrophilic coating facilitates advancement of the catheter through the vasculature.

The modified EBONY® PTA 0.014" RX Dilatation Catheter has a new hydrophilic coating, applicable to all lengths to the currently available sizes.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document is a 510(k) Pre-market Notification for a medical device, the Ebony® PTA 0.014" RX Peripheral Dilatation Catheter. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than providing a detailed study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the context of an AI/algorithm-based diagnostic device.

Therefore, many of the requested sections related to AI device evaluation (e.g., sample sizes for test/training sets, expert qualifications, MRMC study, ground truth types) are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this document, as it describes a physical medical device (a catheter) with a changed hydrophilic coating.

However, I can extract information related to the performance data and conclusion of the substantial equivalence review.

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Acceptance Criteria CategoryReported Device Performance / Evaluation
Coating IntegrityBench testing performed. (Specific acceptance criteria not detailed in this summary.)
Particulate EvaluationBench testing performed. (Specific acceptance criteria not detailed in this summary.)
BiocompatibilityBench testing performed. (Specific acceptance criteria not detailed in this summary.)
Intended UseSame as predicate devices (K112513 and K142459). Intended for dilatation of lesions in the iliac, femoral, popliteal, infra popliteal, and renal arteries. Not for use in coronary or neuro-vasculature.
MaterialsSame as predicate devices.
RX DesignSame as predicate devices.
Overall EquivalenceMet all verification/validation acceptance criteria, demonstrating substantial equivalence to the predicate device.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

This document describes bench testing on physical devices. It does not mention "test sets" or "data provenance" in the context of clinical data for an AI device. The tests were performed on the modified Ebony PTA .014" RX Catheter or leveraged from similar catheters. The specific number of catheters tested for each bench test is not provided in this summary.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience)

Not applicable. This is for a physical medical device, not an AI diagnostic device requiring expert interpretation of results for ground truth.

4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

Not applicable. This document refers to engineering and biocompatibility testing where "ground truth" would be established by physical measurements and accepted industry standards, not clinical expert consensus or pathology.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. There is no AI algorithm being described, so no training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable.

§ 870.1250 Percutaneous catheter.

(a)
Identification. A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).