(116 days)
No
The device description and performance studies focus on mechanical components and structural integrity, with no mention of AI/ML or related concepts like image processing, training/test sets, or performance metrics typically associated with AI/ML algorithms.
Yes
The device is intended to provide immobilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion for a variety of acute and chronic instabilities, injuries, and degenerative diseases of the cervical and thoracic spine, which aligns with the definition of a therapeutic device.
No
The device is a surgical implant system designed to provide immobilization and support to the spine, not to identify or diagnose medical conditions.
No
The device description explicitly states that the system consists of physical implants (rods, hooks, screws, connecting components) made from titanium alloy, which are hardware components.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are medical devices used to perform tests on samples taken from the human body (like blood, urine, tissue) to provide information about a person's health.
- Device Description and Intended Use: The CENTINEL SPINE PCT SYSTEM is a system of implants (rods, hooks, screws) intended for surgical implantation to stabilize the spine. It is used in vivo (within the body) as an adjunct to fusion or to restore spinal integrity.
- Lack of Diagnostic Activity: The description does not mention any testing of biological samples or providing diagnostic information based on such tests.
Therefore, the CENTINEL SPINE PCT SYSTEM is a surgical implant device, not an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The CENTINEL SPINE PCT SYSTEM is intended to provide immobilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine from T1-T3: traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous fusions (e.g., pseudarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; and degenerative disease, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability. The CENTINEL SPINE PCT SYSTEM is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
Product codes
NKG, KWP
Device Description
The Centinel Spine PCT System consists of a variety of shapes and sizes of rods, hooks, polyaxial screws, and connecting components (e.g., variable and fixed cross connectors). The hooks and polyaxial screws are intended to be attached to the posterior elements of the cervical and/or upper thoracic spine and serve as bone anchors. The rods are longitudinally secured to the bone anchors with the set screw. The various connecting components serve to both secure the construct and provide additional construct configuration options. All implants are manufactured from titanium alloy, Ti6A14V (ASTM F136 or ISO 5832-3)
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine from T1-T3
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Prescription Use
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Performance Testing: Published literature and performance testing indicates the Centinel Spine PCT System is as mechanically sound as predicate devices. Testing included static compression, static torsion, dynamic compression, and dynamic torsion per a modified version of ASTM F1717. ASTM F1798 testing included axial slip and torsional grip testing. The results demonstrate that the acceptance criteria defined by predicate device performance were met.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
DePuy Synthes Spine Synapse System (K142838), Pioneer Surgical Technology Streamline OCT System (K121725), Blackstone Posterior Cervical System (K030197), Exactech Gibralt Spinal System (K140645, K110197)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 888.3075 Posterior cervical screw system.
(a)
Identification. Posterior cervical screw systems are comprised of multiple, interconnecting components, made from a variety of materials that allow an implant system to be built from the occiput to the upper thoracic spine to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements, as determined by preoperative cross-sectional imaging. Such a spinal assembly consists of a combination of bone anchors via screws (i.e., occipital screws, cervical lateral mass screws, cervical pedicle screws, C2 pars screws, C2 translaminar screws, C2 transarticular screws), longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods, including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors), and closure mechanisms (e.g., set screws, nuts). Posterior cervical screw systems are rigidly fixed devices that do not contain dynamic features, including but not limited to: non-uniform longitudinal elements or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.Posterior cervical screw systems are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in patients as an adjunct to fusion for acute and chronic instabilities of the cervical spine and/or craniocervical junction and/or cervicothoracic junction such as: (1) Traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; (2) deformities; (3) instabilities; (4) failed previous fusions (
e.g., pseudarthrosis); (5) tumors; (6) inflammatory disorders; (7) spinal degeneration, including neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by imaging studies (radiographs, CT, MRI); (8) degeneration of the facets with instability; and (9) reconstruction following decompression to treat radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. These systems are also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for posterior cervical screw systems are:(1) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use.
(2) Nonclinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant.
(3) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments.
(5) Labeling must include the following:
(i) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation;
(ii) Intended use and indications for use including levels of fixation;
(iii) Device specific warnings, precautions, and contraindications that include the following statements:
(A) “Precaution: Preoperative planning prior to implantation of posterior cervical screw systems should include review of cross-sectional imaging studies (
e.g., CT and/or MRI) to evaluate the patient's cervical anatomy including the transverse foramen, neurologic structures, and the course of the vertebral arteries. If any findings would compromise the placement of these screws, other surgical methods should be considered. In addition, use of intraoperative imaging should be considered to guide and/or verify device placement, as necessary.”(B) “Precaution: Use of posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation at the C3 through C6 spinal levels requires careful consideration and planning beyond that required for lateral mass screws placed at these spinal levels, given the proximity of the vertebral arteries and neurologic structures in relation to the cervical pedicles at these levels.”
(iv) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status;
(v) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user, and;
(vi) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol representing the human form, depicted as three stylized profiles facing to the right. The profiles are connected and flow together, creating a sense of unity and collaboration.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
December 1, 2015
Centinel Spine, Incorporated Ms. Jessica Staub Director, Quality and Regulatory 900 Airport Road, Suite 3B West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380
Re: K152211 Trade/Device Name: Centinel Spine PCT System Regulatory Class: Unclassified Product Code: NKG, KWP Dated: October 28, 2015 Received: October 30, 2015
Dear Ms. Staub:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
1
Page 2 - Ms. Jessica Staub
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K152211
Device Name Centinel Spine PCT System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The CENTINEL SPINE PCT SYSTEM is intended to provide immobilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine from T1-T3: traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous fusions (e.g., pseudarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; and degenerative disease, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability. The CENTINEL SPINE PCT SYSTEM is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | |
| ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
4. 510(k) Summary
| Device Trade Name: | Centinel Spine PCT System |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer: | Centinel Spine, Inc. |
| 900 Airport Road, Suite 3B | |
| West Chester, PA 19380 | |
| Contact: | Ms. Jessica Staub |
| Director, Quality and Regulatory | |
| Phone: (484) 887.8803 | |
| Prepared by: | Mr. Justin Eggleton |
| Musculoskeletal Clinical Regulatory Advisers, LLC | |
| 1331 H Street NW, 12th Floor | |
| Washington, DC 20005 | |
| Phone: (202) 552-5800 | |
| jeggleton@mcra.com | |
| Date Prepared: | October 28, 2015 |
| Classifications: | Unclassified (Pre-Amendment Device) |
| Class: | Unclassified |
| Product Codes: | NKG, KWP |
| Primary Predicate: | DePuy Synthes Spine Synapse System (K142838) |
| Additional Predicates: | Pioneer Surgical Technology Streamline OCT System (K121725) |
| Blackstone Posterior Cervical System (K030197) | |
| Exactech Gibralt Spinal System (K140645, K110197) |
Indications For Use:
The CENTINEL SPINE PCT SYSTEM is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine from T1-T3: traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous fusions (e.g., pseudarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; and degenerative disease, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability. The CENTINEL SPINE PCT SYSTEM is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
4
Summary of Technological Characteristics:
The Centinel Spine PCT System consists of a variety of shapes and sizes of rods, hooks, polyaxial screws, and connecting components (e.g., variable and fixed cross connectors). The hooks and polyaxial screws are intended to be attached to the posterior elements of the cervical and/or upper thoracic spine and serve as bone anchors. The rods are longitudinally secured to the bone anchors with the set screw. The various connecting components serve to both secure the construct and provide additional construct configuration options. All implants are manufactured from titanium alloy, Ti6A14V (ASTM F136 or ISO 5832-3)
Predicate Device:
The subject Centinel Spine PCT System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices cited in this 510(k) summary with respect to indications, design, function, and performance.
Substantial Equivalence:
Centinel Spine PCT System and the primary predicate DePuy Synthes Spine Synapse OCT system are similar in indications for use, design, material, function, and performance. Additional comparisons were made to alternate predicate devices with the same indications for use, design, material, function, and performance.
Performance Testing:
Published literature and performance testing indicates the Centinel Spine PCT System is as mechanically sound as predicate devices. Testing included static compression, static torsion, dynamic compression, and dynamic torsion per a modified version of ASTM F1717. ASTM F1798 testing included axial slip and torsional grip testing. The results demonstrate that the acceptance criteria defined by predicate device performance were met.
Conclusion:
The purpose of this 510(k) is to introduce the Centinel Spine PCT System to interstate commerce. The 510(k) demonstrates substantial equivalence to the predicate devices cited in this summary.