(187 days)
Hospira Extension sets are indicated for the delivery of fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system.
The Hospira Extension Sets are intended for use as gravity sets. Hospira Extension sets are comprised of various components including the following: male luer adapter with cap, tubing, female luer adapter, flow control device, in-line adapter, injection site assembly, and Dial-A-Flo. Extension sets are configured to ensure the intended use of the device is met. Hospira Extension sets are intended for the delivery of fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system. The sets are disposable devices for single patient use.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for Hospira Extension Sets, which are intravascular administration sets. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, primarily due to changes in tubing material and a needleless valve component.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are primarily derived from international standards for medical devices, specifically those relating to biocompatibility and mechanical/functional performance of IV administration sets. The reported device performance indicates that the new Hospira Extension Sets meet these standards.
| Acceptance Criteria (Standard & Section) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Biocompatibility: | |
| ISO 10993-4 Hemocompatibility | Acceptable |
| ISO 10993-5 Cytotoxicity | Acceptable |
| ISO 10993-10 Sensitization | Acceptable |
| ISO 10993-11 Intracutaneous Reactivity | Acceptable |
| Systemic Toxicity | Acceptable |
| Acute Toxicity | Acceptable |
| Subchronic Toxicity | Acceptable |
| Pyrogenicity | Acceptable |
| Mechanical/Functional Performance: | |
| ISO 594-1 (Conical fittings with a 6% (Luer) taper for syringes, needles, and certain other medical equipment): | |
| 4.1 Gauging | Acceptable |
| 4.2 Liquid Leakage | Acceptable |
| 4.3 Air Leakage | Acceptable |
| 4.4 Separation Force | Acceptable |
| 4.5 Stress Cracking | Acceptable |
| ISO 594-2 (Conical fittings with a 6% (Luer) taper - Part 2: Lock fittings): | |
| 4.1 Gauging | Acceptable |
| 4.2 Liquid Leakage | Acceptable |
| 4.3 Separation Force | Acceptable |
| 4.4 Unscrewing Torque | Acceptable |
| 4.5 Ease of Assembly | Acceptable |
| 4.6 Resistance to Overriding | Acceptable |
| 4.7 Stress Cracking | Acceptable |
| ISO 8536-4 (Infusion equipment for medical use - Part 4: Infusion sets for single use, gravity feed): | |
| 6.1 Particulate Contamination | Acceptable |
| 6.2 Leakage | Acceptable |
| 6.3 Tensile Strength | Acceptable |
| 6.6 Tubing | Acceptable |
| 6.7 Fluid Filter | Acceptable |
| 6.9 Flow Regulator | Acceptable |
| 6.10 Flow Rate | Acceptable |
| 6.11 Injection Site | Acceptable |
| 6.12 Male Conical Fitting | Acceptable |
| 6.13 Protective Caps | Acceptable |
| Sterilization: | |
| Sterility Assurance Level (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1 and 11737-1) | 10^-6 |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and the Data Provenance
The document does not explicitly state the sample sizes used for each specific test mentioned (e.g., number of devices tested for liquid leakage, number of samples for cytotoxicity). It broadly states that "new data has been generated" and "all testing is acceptable."
The data provenance is not specified in terms of country of origin. The studies are non-clinical (laboratory testing) rather than studies on human subjects, so the retrospective or prospective nature isn't directly applicable in the same way it would be for clinical trials. The focus is on demonstrating compliance with recognized international standards for device performance and safety.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not applicable and not provided in the document. The "ground truth" for non-clinical performance and biocompatibility testing is established by the specified standards (ISO 10993, ISO 594-1, ISO 594-2, ISO 8536-4), rather than expert consensus on interpretive data. The tests themselves are objective measurements against defined parameters.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used in studies involving subjective assessment (e.g., image interpretation by multiple readers). For objective bench testing against defined standards, the outcome is determined by whether the device's performance falls within the specified acceptance limits for each test.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve With AI vs Without AI Assistance
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. This type of study is not relevant for the evaluation of an invasive medical device like an extension set, which does not involve human interpretation of diagnostic data or AI assistance in a clinical workflow.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
No standalone algorithm performance study was done. This device is not an AI/ML-based diagnostic or therapeutic algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used (Expert Consensus, Pathology, Outcomes Data, etc.)
The "ground truth" for the device's performance is defined by adherence to objective, quantitative and qualitative criteria set forth in recognized international standards (ISO 10993, ISO 594-1, ISO 594-2, ISO 8536-4, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11737-1). For example, for "liquid leakage," the ground truth is whether the device leaks or not under specified test conditions, as defined by the ISO standard. For "cytotoxicity," it's whether the materials cause a cytotoxic reaction above a defined threshold.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable. The development of this medical device (Hospira Extension Sets) does not involve a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI. The design and validation are based on engineering principles, materials science, and compliance with established performance standards.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
This information is not applicable for the same reason as point 8.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
January 19, 2016
Hospira, Inc. Mr. Charles Neitzel Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 375 Field Drive Lake Forest, Illinois 60045
Re: K151969
Trade/Device Name: Hospira Extension Sets Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5440 Regulation Name: Intravascular Administration Sets Regulatory Class: II Product Code: FPA Dated: December 15, 2015 Received: December 17, 2015
Dear Mr. Charles Neitzel:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
Tina Kiang
-s
for Erin I. Keith, M.S. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K151969
Device Name Hospira Extension Sets
Indications for Use (Describe)
Hospira Extension sets are indicated for the delivery of fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Hospira. The logo consists of the word "Hospira" in a gray, sans-serif font, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic is composed of three curved lines that converge at the top, resembling a stylized leaf or abstract shape. The overall design is simple and modern.
510(k) Summary Section 5
A summary of 510(k) substantial equivalence information in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92 for Hospira Extension Sets.
| Submitter Information | |
|---|---|
| Name | Hospira, Incorporated |
| Address | D-393, Bldg. H3375 North Field DriveLake Forest, IL. 60046 |
| Phone number | (224) 212-6087 |
| Fax number | (224) 212-5401 |
| Establishment RegistrationNumber | 3005579246 (Owner/Operator #9063339) |
| Name of contact person | Charles Neitzel, Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Date prepared | January 13, 2016 |
| Name of device | |
| Trade or proprietary name | Hospira Extension Sets |
| Common or usual name | I.V Administration Sets |
| Classification name | Intravascular Administration Set, 21 CFR 880.5440, Class II |
| Product Code(s) | FPA |
| Legally marketed device(s) towhich equivalence is claimed | Extension Sets - K142974Hospira Extension Sets – K142433 |
| Reason for 510(k) submission | The changes addressed in this submission include:1. Hospira is changing the tubing material formulation currently used in HospiraExtension Sets.2. Hospira is replacing the needleless valve Clave™ component on certain IVadministration Hospira Extension Sets with the MicroClave™ component. |
| Device description | The Hospira Extension Sets are intended for use as gravity sets. Hospira Extensionsets are comprised of various components including the following: male luer adapterwith cap, tubing, female luer adapter, flow control device, in-line adapter, injectionsite assembly, and Dial-A-Flo. Extension sets are configured to ensure the intendeduse of the device is met. Hospira Extension sets are intended for the delivery of fluidsfrom a container to a patient's vascular system. The sets are disposable devices forsingle patient use. |
| Intended Use of Device | Hospira Extension set is intended for the delivery of fluids from a container to apatient's vascular system. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the Hospira logo. The logo features the company name "Hospira" in a simple, sans-serif font. Above the name is an abstract graphic consisting of three curved lines that converge at a point, resembling stylized leaves or a modern arch. The logo is presented in grayscale.
| Summary of the technological characteristics of the device compared to the predicate device | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Predicate | Proposed Device | ||||||||||||||
| Indications for Use | Hospira Extension Sets are indicated for the delivery of fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system. | Hospira Extension Sets are indicated for the delivery of fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system. | ||||||||||||||
| Design and Materials of Construction | The design and materials of construction are as cleared under the predicate 510(k) | The design and materials of construction remain the same as the predicate product with the following exceptions:1. Hospira is changing the tubing material formulation currently used in Extension Sets.2. Hospira is replacing the ClaveTM component on certain IV administration Extension Sets with the MicroClaveTM component.The MicroClave performs functionally the same as the Clave, for the same intended use, and is comprised of similar materials. The Microclave is a cleared component under ICU Medical 510(k) K970855 establishing substantial equivalence. | ||||||||||||||
| Summary of non-clinical tests for determination of substantial equivalence | All materials of construction for Hospira Extension Sets meet the applicable material test requirements for ISO 10993 | New data has been generated demonstrating that all materials of construction for Hospira Extension Sets meet the applicable material test requirements for ISO 10993.ISO Standard Biological Effect Tested ISO 10993-4 Hemocompatibility ISO 10993-5 Cytotoxicity ISO 10993-10 Sensitization ISO 10993-11 Intracutaneous Reactivity Systemic Toxicity Suacute Toxicity Subchronic Toxicity Pyrogenicity |
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the Hospira logo. The logo features the company name "Hospira" in a simple, sans-serif font, with the letters in a light gray color. Above the name is an abstract graphic consisting of three curved lines that converge at a point, creating a sense of movement or flow. The lines are in varying shades of gray, with the central line being the darkest.
| Summary of Performance Testing | Performance testing was conducted to ensure the device performs as intended in accordance with applicable standards. All testing is acceptable.The product Sterility Assurance Level is 10-6. | New performance data has been generated to ensure the device performs as intended in accordance with ISO 594-1, ISO 594-2, and ISO 8536-4. All testing is acceptable. | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO Standard Section Tested ISO 594-1 4.1 Gauging4.2 Liquid Leakage4.3 Air Leakage4.4 Separation Force4.5 Stress Cracking ISO 594-2 4.1 Gauging4.2 Liquid Leakage4.3 Separation Force4.4 Unscrewing Torque4.5 Ease of Assembly4.6 Resistance to Overriding4.7 Stress Cracking ISO 8536-4 6.1 Particulate Contamination6.2 Leakage6.3 Tensile Strength6.6 Tubing6.7 Fluid Filter6.9 Flow Regulator6.10 Flow Rate6.11 Injection Site6.12 Male Conical Fitting6.13 Protective Caps Sterilization validation has been conducted based on the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1 and ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11737-1 international standards for sterilization of medical devices. All testing is acceptable. The product Sterility Assurance Level is 10-6. |
Conclusion
Hospira Extension Sets meet the functional claims and intended use as described in the product labeling. Hospira Extension Sets are substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
§ 880.5440 Intravascular administration set.
(a)
Identification. An intravascular administration set is a device used to administer fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system through a needle or catheter inserted into a vein. The device may include the needle or catheter, tubing, a flow regulator, a drip chamber, an infusion line filter, an I.V. set stopcock, fluid delivery tubing, connectors between parts of the set, a side tube with a cap to serve as an injection site, and a hollow spike to penetrate and connect the tubing to an I.V. bag or other infusion fluid container.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special control for pharmacy compounding systems within this classification is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Pharmacy Compounding Systems; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers.” Pharmacy compounding systems classified within the intravascular administration set are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of this part and subject to the limitations in § 880.9.