(28 days)
The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 is indicated for use in generating radiographic images of human anatomy. It is intended to replace radiographic film/screen system in general-purpse diagnostic procedures.
The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 is not in mammography. fluoroscopy, tomography and angiography applications.
The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 including AeroDR P-51 and AeroDR P-52 is intended for use in generating radiographic images of human anatomy. It is intended to replace radiographic film/screen systems in general-purpose diagnostic procedures. The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 is not indicated for use in mammography, fluoroscopy, tomography and angiography applications.
The AeroDR P-51 and AeroDR P-52 (hereinafter AeroDR detector) are lightweight, mobile FPD those are that is compatible with the size of ISO standard.
The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 performs X-ray imaging of the human body using an X-ray planar detector (FPD) that outputs a digital signal, which is then input into an image processing device, and the acquired image is then transmitted to a filing system, printer, and image display device as diagnostic image data. The image processing device displays the image on the screen after applying image processing to the raw data of image provided by FPD. The AeroDR detector can communicate with the image processing device through the wired Ethernet and/or the Wireless LAN (IEEE802.11a/n and FCC compliant). The WPA2-PSK (AES) encryption is adopted for a security of wireless connection.
The operator console software, Console CS-7, is a software program for installation on a PC. It performs image processing of X-ray images received from an AeroDR FPDs. The modified post processing function named 'Intelligent Grid' (IG Processing) is introduced as a part of the Image post processing function of console CS-7 software. The IG processing are fundamentally the same as those functions of other post processing of the Image Processing module of Console CS-7. The IG Processing is NOT a function for substitution of Grid's effects. It's a post processing of image adjustment to reduce the effects of scatter radiation. The user can adjusts to improve contrast by reducing effects of scatter radiation, and then the user MUST confirm the effects of the processing prior to determining the final images as well.
The provided text does not contain detailed information regarding the acceptance criteria of device performance and the study that proves the device meets those criteria for the AeroDR System 2.
The document is a 510(k) premarket notification, which primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than a comprehensive performance study with specific acceptance criteria.
Here's what can be extracted based on the request and the provided text:
- No detailed acceptance criteria or reported device performance for specific metrics are provided. The document states that the image performance specification of the proposed device (AeroDR P-52) is the same as the AeroDR P-12 (a component of the predicate AeroDR SYSTEM 2, K141271, and originally cleared as K102349).
- Non-clinical tests were conducted where "qualified persons have affirmed and have concluded that both nonclinical images of proposed AeroDR P-52 and predicate AeroDR P-12 are equivalent and have sufficient capabilities for the intended purpose of the device." However, no specific metrics or quantitative acceptance criteria for image quality are given.
- Risk analysis was performed for the modifications (addition of AeroDR P-52 and modification of 'Intelligent Grid' function), and the conclusion was that these changes "don't pose any significant risk to device safety or effectiveness." It also states that "All of the verification activities, as required by the risk analysis, for the modification to AeroDR SYSTEM 2 were performed and the results demonstrated that the predetermined acceptance criteria were met." However, these acceptance criteria are not detailed in the document.
Therefore, most of the specific information requested cannot be provided from this document.
Missing Information:
- A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance.
- Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and qualifications.
- Adjudication method for the test set.
- If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and its effect size.
- If a standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done.
- The type of ground truth used.
- The sample size for the training set.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established.
The document explicitly states: "The clinical studies as a performance testing are not required to support substantial equivalence for the proposed device." This further indicates that a comprehensive, independent study with detailed acceptance criteria and performance metrics (as typically looked for in an AI/ML context for diagnostic accuracy) was not conducted or reported in this 510(k) summary. The demonstration was largely based on the equivalence of technological characteristics and non-clinical image evaluations.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
June 29, 2015
Konica Minolta, Inc. % Mr. Russell D. Munves U.S. Agent Storch Amini & Munves, PC 140 East 45th Street, 25th Floor NEW YORK NY 10017
Re: K151465 Trade/Device Name: AeroDR System 2 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1680 Regulation Name: Stationary x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MQB, LLZ Dated: May 28, 2015 Received: June 1, 2015
Dear Mr. Munves:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Robert A Ochs
Robert Ochs. Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K151465
Device Name AeroDR System 2
Indications for Use (Describe)
The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 is indicated for use in generating radiographic images of human anatomy. It is intended to replace radiographic film/screen system in general-purpse diagnostic procedures.
The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 is not in mammography. fluoroscopy, tomography and angiography applications.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| ☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
| Submitter's Name: | KONICA MINOLTA, INC. |
|---|---|
| Address: | 1 Sakura-machi,Hino-shi, 191-8511 Japan |
| Contact: | Shigeyuki Kojima |
| Telephone: | +81 42 589 8429 |
| Date: | May 28, 2015 |
| Trade Name: | AeroDR System 2 |
| Model No: | AeroDR P-51, AeroDR P-52 |
| Common Name: | Digital Radiography |
| Regulation Name / Number: | Stationary x-ray system / 21 CFR 892.1680 |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Product Code(s): | 90-MQB, 90-LLZ |
| Predicate Device(s): | K141271 - AeroDR SYSTEM 2 (KONICA MINOLTA, INC.)Regulation Name: Stationary x-ray system (21CFR 892.1680),Product Codes: 90-MQB, 90-LLZ |
| Device Description: | The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 including AeroDR P-51 and AeroDR P-52 isintended for use in generating radiographic images of human anatomy.It is intended to replace radiographic film/screen systems in general-purpose diagnostic procedures. The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 is not indicated foruse in mammography, fluoroscopy, tomography and angiographyapplications.The AeroDR P-51 and AeroDR P-52 (hereinafter AeroDR detector) arelightweight, mobile FPD those are that is compatible with the size of ISOstandard.The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 performs X-ray imaging of the human body usingan X-ray planar detector (FPD) that outputs a digital signal, which is then |
{4}------------------------------------------------
input into an image processing device, and the acquired image is then transmitted to a filing system, printer, and image display device as diagnostic image data. The image processing device displays the image on the screen after applying image processing to the raw data of image provided by FPD. The AeroDR detector can communicate with the image processing device through the wired Ethernet and/or the Wireless LAN (IEEE802.11a/n and FCC compliant). The WPA2-PSK (AES) encryption is adopted for a security of wireless connection.
The operator console software, Console CS-7, is a software program for installation on a PC. It performs image processing of X-ray images received from an AeroDR FPDs. The modified post processing function named 'Intelligent Grid' (IG Processing) is introduced as a part of the Image post processing function of console CS-7 software. The IG processing are fundamentally the same as those functions of other post processing of the Image Processing module of Console CS-7. The IG Processing is NOT a function for substitution of Grid's effects. It's a post processing of image adjustment to reduce the effects of scatter radiation. The user can adjusts to improve contrast by reducing effects of scatter radiation, and then the user MUST confirm the effects of the processing prior to determining the final images as well.
The AeroDR System 2 is designed to comply with the following standards: AAMI/ANSI ES 60601-1 (Ed.3), IEC 60601-1-2, and ISO 10993-1.
Indications for Use:
The AeroDR SYSTEM2 is indicated for use in generating radiographic images of human anatomy. It is intended to replace radiographic film/screen systems in general-purpose diagnostic procedures. The AeroDR SYSTEM 2 is not indicated for use in mammography, fluoroscopy, tomography and angiography applications.
Summary of Technological Characteristics Compared to Predicate Device:
The modified AeroDR SYSTEM 2 employs the same fundamental scientific technologies as the predicate device (K141271). The indications for use are identical to the predicate device, and the operating principles are not changed from K141271.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The summary of comparisons of technological characteristics for both systems is provided as follows;
Operational principles and designing:
Nothing to be changed from the operational principles of the predicate device. The changes in operation and weight by means of different size of battery are NOT essential for the intended use of this device. The specification for the image performance of proposed device is same as AeroDR P-12, which is a component of AeroDR SYSTEM 2(K141271) and originally cleared as K102349.
Non-clinical test:
The qualified persons have affirmed and have concluded that both nonclinical images of proposed AeroDR P-52 and predicate AeroDR P-12 are equivalent and have sufficient capabilities for the intended purpose of the device. Besides, the results of risk management, the proposed modification does NOT require clinical evaluation to demonstrate the substantial equivalency of the modified device.
Safety:
The system is in conformance with the standards described above, which are same standards to those of predicate device.
Biocompatibility:
The patient contact materials of human body surface are evaluated under ISO 10993 and determined as acceptable for these usages. The both systems achieve same acceptance level for biocompatibility.
Modification under the Design Control as per 21CFR 820.30:
The risk analysis was performed on the proposed device including two major differences from the predicate device, that differences are the addition of AeroDR P-52 and the modification of the post processing function named 'Intelligent Grid' of console CS-7 software, and the conclusion of risk analysis is that two above-mentioned changes don't pose any significant risk to device safety or effectiveness. The modified device has been verified and validated according to the same procedure as the predicate device. All of the verification activities, as required by the risk analysis, for the modification to AeroDR SYSTEM 2 were performed and the results demonstrated that the predetermined acceptance criteria were met.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Conclusion:
The clinical studies as a performance testing are not required to support substantial equivalence for the proposed device. In addition to that, as discussed in the above technological comparison, the technological characteristics of the modified AeroDR SYSTEM 2 are deemed to be substantially equivalent to the predicate device that have already been cleared for USA distribution with 510(k) premarket notification number K141271.
§ 892.1680 Stationary x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. A stationary x-ray system is a permanently installed diagnostic system intended to generate and control x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). A radiographic contrast tray or radiology diagnostic kit intended for use with a stationary x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.