K Number
K150108
Date Cleared
2015-04-22

(92 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
870.3300
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Reverse Medical Micro Vascular Plug (MVP-7, MVP-9) System is intended for use to obstruct or reduce the rate of blood flow in the peripheral vasculature.

Device Description

Reverse Medical® MVP® Micro Vascular Plug System consists of a micro vascular occlusion plug that is attached to a composite delivery wire and is intended to be delivered to the treatment site through a catheter. The MVP occlusion plug is a selfexpandable, ovoid-shaped frame made from nitinol and incorporates a PTFE cover over the proximal portion of the ovoid. The plug device is secured at both ends with platinum marker bands. The proximal marker band is attached to a delivery wire that is used to push the plug device through a commercially available catheter to the intended treatment site. After satisfactory deployment of the plug device at the treatment site, the implant is detached from the delivery wire by rotating the wire counter clockwise.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Reverse Medical Micro Vascular Plug (MVP-7 & MVP-9) and outlines the basis for determining substantial equivalence to predicate devices. However, it does not contain a detailed study with acceptance criteria and reported device performance in the format requested.

The document primarily focuses on demonstrating that the modified MVP-7 and MVP-9 devices are substantially equivalent to their predicate devices (MVP-3Q, MVP-5Q, MVP-3, and MVP-5) based on their intended use, design, materials, principle of operation, and overall technological characteristics.

Instead of a specific clinical study with detailed acceptance criteria and performance metrics, it lists a series of non-clinical performance tests conducted to verify the design changes. These tests primarily address the physical and mechanical aspects of the device and its compatibility with delivery systems.

Here's an attempt to structure the information based on the request, acknowledging the limitations of the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not explicitly state acceptance criteria in a quantitative, measurable format with corresponding "reported device performance" values for clinical outcomes. The performance tests listed are primarily non-clinical assessments.

Acceptance Criteria (Implied from tests)Reported Device Performance (Summary from text)
Dimensional AccuracyAll units met all inspection criteria
Visual InspectionAll units met all inspection criteria
Catheter CompatibilityDemonstrated within "Simulated Use Vascular Model"
    Flexibility within catheterTested and met criteria (implies satisfactory performance)
    Delivery wire kinking assessmentTested and met criteria (implies satisfactory performance)
    Multiple deployments and withdrawals through catheterTested and met criteria (implies satisfactory performance)
    Force required to deploy and retract device within catheterTested and met criteria (implies satisfactory performance)
Detachment EvaluationsTested and met criteria (implies satisfactory performance)
    Number of turns required to detach implantTested and met criteria (implies satisfactory performance)
    Torque strength of detachment junctionTested and met criteria (implies satisfactory performance)
Galvanic CorrosionTested per ASTM G71 (implies satisfactory performance)
MRI CompatibilityTested per ASTM F-2503 (implies satisfactory performance)

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

The document does not specify human clinical "test set" sample sizes, as the performance tests described are non-clinical tests performed on "units that were sterilized and met all inspection criteria." Data provenance is from in-house non-clinical testing by Reverse Medical Corporation.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

Not applicable. The tests described are engineering/material performance tests, not clinical evaluations requiring expert interpretation of ground truth in the context of diagnostic or interventional efficacy.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

Not applicable for non-clinical engineering tests.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This is not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interventional device, but a physical vascular embolization device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This is not an algorithm, but a physical medical device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For the non-clinical tests, the "ground truth" is defined by the specifications and standards of the tests themselves (e.g., dimensional requirements, force measurements, compliance with ASTM standards for corrosion and MRI compatibility).

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This is not a machine learning or AI device that requires a training set. The "units" for testing refer to manufactured devices.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. There is no training set for this device.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of a human figure, represented by three overlapping profiles, with the head tilted upwards.

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

April 22, 2015

Reverse Medical Corporation Ms. Laura Heaton Associate Director of Regulatory Affairs 13700 Alton Parkway, Suite 167 Irvine, CA 92618

Re: K150108

Trade/Device Name: Reverse Medical Micro Vascular Plug (MVP-7 & MVP-9) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.3300 Regulation Name: Vascular Embolization Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KRD Dated: March 20, 2015 Received: March 23, 2015

Dear Laura Heaton:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set

{1}------------------------------------------------

forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely yours,

Kenneth J. Cavanaugh -S

for Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K150108

Device Name

Reverse Medical Micro Vascular Plug (MVP-7, MVP-9)

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Reverse Medical Micro Vascular Plug (MVP-7, MVP-9) System is intended for use to obstruct or reduce the rate of blood flow in the peripheral vasculature.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) Registration Use (Part 21 CFR 201.2 Subject to Review) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 201.2 Subject to Review)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

Date Prepared January 15, 2015

Sponsor Reverse Medical Corporation

Address and The registration number of the manufacturer and sterilization sites for both vascular Registration # embolization devices are as follows:

ManufacturerSterilization Site
Reverse Medical Corporation13700 Alton Parkway, Suite 167Irvine, CA 92618Parter Medical17115 Kingsview AvenueCarson, CA 90746
FDA Registration #:3007170829FDA Registration #:2024311

Contact Person Laura Heaton, Associate Director of Regulatory Affairs E-mail: Laura.Heaton@covidien.com

Device Name The device trade names and common/classification names are:

Device Trade NameCommon/Classification Name
Reverse Medical Micro Vascular PlugVascular Embolization Device

Device Class Vascular embolization devices have been classified as Class II, KRD under 21 CFR §870.3300. The Class III Summary and Certification requirement as described in 21 CFR §807.87(j) and §807.94 do not apply to this device and submission. No performance standards have been established under Section 514 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for vascular embolization devices.

Predicate The predicate device is the Reverse Medical Micro Vascular Plug (MVP-3Q and Device MVP-5Q), K141313, concurrence date June 18, 2014. The predicate device is also Micro Vascular Plug (MVP-3) K123803 concurrence date July 2, 2013 and also (MVP-5) Information K133282 concurrence date Nov. 27, 2013.

Purpose The purpose of this special 510(k) submission is to obtain market clearance for two (2) of Submission modifications of the MVP System. The first is to change the outer diameter and the length of the implant. The second is to the outer diameter of the delivery wire. These changes allow for the obstruction of larger blood vessels in the peripheral vasculature.

The Reverse Medical Corporation MVP Micro Vascular Plug System is indicated to Indications for Use and obstruct or reduce the rate of blood flow in the peripheral vasculature. Intended Use

Device Reverse Medical® MVP® Micro Vascular Plug System consists of a micro vascular Description occlusion plug that is attached to a composite delivery wire and is intended to be delivered to the treatment site through a catheter. The MVP occlusion plug is a selfexpandable, ovoid-shaped frame made from nitinol and incorporates a PTFE cover over the proximal portion of the ovoid. The plug device is secured at both ends with

{4}------------------------------------------------

platinum marker bands. The proximal marker band is attached to a delivery wire that is used to push the plug device through a commercially available catheter to the intended treatment site. After satisfactory deployment of the plug device at the treatment site, the implant is detached from the delivery wire by rotating the wire counter clockwise.

Technical The modified devices have the same technological characteristics as the predicate Characteristics devices.

K123803/K133282Submission Subject
FeatureMVP-3Q/MVP-5QPredicateMVP-3/MVP-5PredicateMVP-7DeviceMVP-9DeviceComparison ofDevice to RMPredicate
Indications forUseTo obstruct or reducethe rate of bloodflow in the peripheralvasculatureTo obstruct or reducethe rate of blood flowin the peripheralvasculatureTo obstructor reduce therate of bloodflow in theperipheralvasculatureTo obstruct orreduce the rateof blood flow inthe peripheralvasculatureldenticalIndications forUse
ManufacturerReverse Medical(RM) Corp.Reverse Medical (RM)Corp.ReverseMedical (RM)Corp.ReverseMedical (RM)Corp.Identicalmanufacturer
Materials ofConstructionNitinol, PTFE,Platinum, Solder,Polypropylenesheath, Urethane,CyanoacrylateNitinol, PTFE,Platinum, stainlesssteel, Solder,Polypropylene sheath,Urethane,CyanoacrylateNitinol, PTFE,Platinum,stainlesssteel, Solder,Polypropylene sheath,Urethane,CyanoacrylateNitinol, PTFE,Platinum,stainless steel,Solder,Polypropylenesheath,Urethane,CyanoacrylateIdenticalMaterials
Plug (Implant)descriptionSelf-expandable,ovoid shaped framewith a PTFE coverover the proximalportionSelf-expandable, ovoidshaped frame with aPTFE cover over theproximal portionSelf-expandable,ovoid shapedframe with aPTFE coverover theproximalportionSelf-expandable,ovoid shapedframe with aPTFE cover overthe proximalportionldenticalImplantmaterialconfiguration
PlugDiameter,UnconstrainedMVP-3Q: 5.3 mmMVP-5Q: 6.5 mmMVP-3: 5.3 mmMVP-5: 6.5 mm9.2 mm13.0 mmLarger implantOD
Plug Length,Unconstrained12 mm12 mm16 mm18 mmLongerimplant

{5}------------------------------------------------

Reverse Medical Corporation Special 510(k): Device Modification MVP-7 and MVP-9

Length
Target VesselDiameterMVP-3Q:1.5-3.0 mmMVP-5Q:3.0-5.0mmMVP-3:1.5-3.0 mmMVP-5:3.0-5.0mm5.0-7.0 mm7.0-9.0 mmLarger targetvesseldiameter
Method ofPlacementDelivery wire througha microcatheterMVP-3Q:0.021"-0.027" IDMVP-5Q: 0.027" IDDelivery wire througha microcatheterMVP-3:0.021"-0.027" IDMVP-5: 0.027" IDDelivery wirethrough a0.041" IDcatheterDelivery wirethrough a0.043" IDcatheterIdenticalDeliverythrough alarger catheter
RadiopaqueMarkersPlatinum markerbands at each end ofthe plugPlatinum markerbands at each end ofthe plugPlatinummarker bandsat each endof the plugPlatinummarker bandsat each end ofthe plugIdenticalmarker bands
Proximal Endof PlugConfigurationProximal markerband attached todelivery wireProximal marker bandattached to deliverywireProximalmarker bandattached todelivery wireProximalmarker bandattached todelivery wireIdenticalproximal endplugconfiguration
Delivery WireLength160-180 cm160-180 cm160-180 cm160-180 cmIdenticalDelivery WireLength Range
DetachmentSystemMechanicalElectrolyticMechanicalMechanicalIdentical
SterilizationProcessEOEOEOEOIdentical
AccessoriesTorquerDetachment Box andCable SetTorquerTorquerIdentical

Due to the changes in the dimensional characteristics the following design verification Performance tests were conducted in accordance with Reverse Medical Design Control procedures. Tests-Non-Clinical All testing was performed on units that were sterilized and met all inspection criteria. Tests on the Reverse Medical MVP System included:

  • Dimensional Inspection
  • . Visual Inspection
  • Catheter compatibility within "Simulated Use Vascular Model" .
    • O Flexibility within catheter
    • 0 Delivery wire kinking assessment

Reverse Medical Corporation

{6}------------------------------------------------

  • Multiple deployments and withdrawals through catheter 0
  • Force required to deploy and retract device within catheter o
  • Detachment Evaluations o
    • Number of turns required to detach implant o
    • o Torque strength of detachment junction
  • Galvanic Corrosion per ASTM G71 .
  • MRI Compatibility per ASTM F-2503

Basis for Determination of Substantial Equivalence

Upon reviewing the performance data and comparing intended use, design, materials, principle of operation and overall technological characteristics, the modified Reverse Medical MVP System is determined to be substantially equivalent to the currently marketed Reverse Medical MVP System. Differences do not raise any issues of safety or effectiveness.

§ 870.3300 Vascular embolization device.

(a)
Identification. A vascular embolization device is an intravascular implant intended to control hemorrhaging due to aneurysms, certain types of tumors (e.g., nephroma, hepatoma, uterine fibroids), and arteriovenous malformations. This does not include cyanoacrylates and other embolic agents, which act by polymerization or precipitation. Embolization devices used in neurovascular applications are also not included in this classification, see § 882.5950 of this chapter.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls.) The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Vascular and Neurovascular Embolization Devices.” For availability of this guidance document, see § 870.1(e).